How NASA is using 3D Printing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
  • 3D Printing has proven itself to be an important part of successful space exploration. NASA has also been investing heavily in this technology. This video will explore how NASA is using 3D printing in many areas and how 3D printing will advance space exploration for the future.
    *Chapters*
    00:00 - Intro
    00:28 - Tools & Repair Parts
    01:42 - Rocket Components
    02:57 - Lunar Habitats
    04:11 - Rovers
    04:51 - Other Areas
    05:34 - Outro
    Subscribe for more interesting stories: www.youtube.com/@aprintedworl...
    Check out my social media: linktr.ee/aprintedworld
    #3DPrinting #3DPrintingNews
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @cruucruu5584
    @cruucruu5584 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    replicators are not far behind now. Star trek becoming a reality 😍

    • @aprintedworld
      @aprintedworld  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is honestly the whole reason for this channel. To see the beginnings of replicators.

  • @richardbailey3343
    @richardbailey3343 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now we are getting somewhere 😮😊

  • @robertmines5391
    @robertmines5391 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A nice video.. you certainly seem to be up to speed on things. The new institute on metal 3d printing you mention at the end will be on certification and understanding of laser processing..essential for predicting performance of critical parts.

  • @docmix
    @docmix ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So pleased I stumbled upon your channel. 3D printing is fascinating, seeming to have limitless applications and I thank you for your clear presentation of a compex subject.

  • @marccracchiolo4935
    @marccracchiolo4935 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We’re getting pretty close to a real world replicator. This is great to boldly go 😮

    • @aprintedworld
      @aprintedworld  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Excited to see the progression towards them.

  • @maequackers5397
    @maequackers5397 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really informative!

  • @johnlilley9363
    @johnlilley9363 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems like you would need some sort of liquid binder which wouldn’t be found on mars , calling shenanigans on the mars 3D printing walls for a habitat

    • @Imbatmn57
      @Imbatmn57 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's a website that says mixing titanium and martian soil is used to 3d print, martian soil is made mostly out of sand/iron oxide, and they would be melted together not mixing water.

    • @johnlilley9363
      @johnlilley9363 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Imbatmn57 wouldn’t you need some sort of refining process to get the native soil to a level of consistency?

  • @joegonzalez6241
    @joegonzalez6241 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i still like my 3d printer design for my space ship factory

  • @46chambersoflife
    @46chambersoflife ปีที่แล้ว

    Still waiting for the first 3-D printed human

    • @aprintedworld
      @aprintedworld  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hopefully I’ll be around to cover it here.

  • @FrankensteinDIYkayak
    @FrankensteinDIYkayak ปีที่แล้ว

    has NASA optimized 3D printing to make use of zero gravity to it's advantage to do prints that can't be done on earth? saame goes for vacuum

    • @aprintedworld
      @aprintedworld  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the only test they did was to see if zero gravity would affect 3D printing in space. Which it did not.

  • @46chambersoflife
    @46chambersoflife ปีที่แล้ว

    We will print spaceships grown to our DNA

  • @ZMacZ
    @ZMacZ ปีที่แล้ว

    Ugh, when building on the Moon, critical structures like habitats, CHAP's and generator power should be underground, not on the surface.
    It has no atmosphee and thus any micrometeors will hit the surface when on collision course for the Moon.
    Cheap solar panels that can be recycled on the Moon itself, after being hit by such a microasteroid up
    to the point of breaking, should also be a usable tech and applied for cheap power, which the Moon
    has in abundance, since it's almost never nighttime, and once again has no atmosphere which then
    enhances Lunar power collection.
    Once all the sub-surface is done, then yes, maybe a couple surface domes for recreation.
    This is true for all teh easily recyclables or expendables, but not for key structures.
    In fact sending a tool drone to the Moon, should be the first step and allows for remote operation
    of just about any task, like drilling, solidifying any subsurface structure.
    The Moon is mostly dust, so digging is hard, with all the dust flowing back into the hole.
    This can be overcome by laserhardening of the dust hole as it is being drilled.
    The alternate method would be solidifying blocks of Lunar dust into solid 'bricks'
    in shapes that allow for veritcal downward construction, like O rings or curved bricks.
    A curved downward spiral for Lunar vehicles with solidified floor would also be useful
    and disallow direct airlock impacts with small-medium meteors, increasing safety.
    For any human presence I'd suggest a spin based gravity enhancer.
    Tilted closed platform carrousel/spinwheel. 0.1 G surely isnt enough for long term presence.

    • @aprintedworld
      @aprintedworld  ปีที่แล้ว

      A very impressive detailed argument for subsurface prioritization, i think the testing of surface colonies on mars is to make the idea of colonization sexy so they can spend more government money without blowback.

  • @richardbailey3343
    @richardbailey3343 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now all nasa has to do is create a viable ftl propulsion unit and they are good to go.
    Regards😊

    • @aprintedworld
      @aprintedworld  ปีที่แล้ว

      No need, They’ll just piggy back off Space X. LOL. Thanks

    • @richardbailey3343
      @richardbailey3343 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aprintedworld i had no idea space x has a practical ftl propulsion system.
      Regards

    • @dusanradin5868
      @dusanradin5868 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They could repeat Moon landing in tghe last 60-70 years.What makes you think that dead dinosaur can pull this out? NASA shouls be shut down as a failure as it is.

  • @Thros1
    @Thros1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Meanwhile spending billions on expendable rockets AGAIN...

    • @aprintedworld
      @aprintedworld  ปีที่แล้ว

      Nothings more efficient than government research.