I happened to get the MB Quart ones by chance and they're kinda nuts. I mean, at least in comparison with most other speakers I've ever had. - Great range and depth and also smooth. - Just too bad that you need a quite capable amplifier for it at 4 Ohm and apparently over 100 Watts, which tend to be expensive amplifiers that I can't just blow some money on. XD - I've been using an old Denon receiver that can do 6 Ohms, but being one of those integrated AV-receivers, and a '90s one at that, it's of course not the best audio-processing.
its the amp that make the tiny sound, I have the same. No treble extension, no decay. The MB Q speakers would show so much more detail if given proper amp.
I happened to get the MB Quart ones by chance and they're kinda nuts. I mean, at least in comparison with most other speakers I've ever had. - Great range and depth and also smooth. - Just too bad that you need a quite capable amplifier for it at 4 Ohm and apparently over 100 Watts, which tend to be expensive amplifiers that I can't just blow some money on. XD - I've been using an old Denon receiver that can do 6 Ohms, but being one of those integrated AV-receivers, and a '90s one at that, it's of course not the best audio-processing.
MB Quart! Aeromax 2 sounds tiny compared to MB Quart. I have MB Quart QL-802's little brother, MB Quart QL-502s, and QL-602s. Amazing Speakers.
its the amp that make the tiny sound, I have the same. No treble extension, no decay. The MB Q speakers would show so much more detail if given proper amp.
apples to oranges comparison. MB quart sounds better of-course.
of course. Thank for your comment.