Pretty sure we saw the defendant in another car case. Edit: Yes, it's a case from two weeks ago called "Unloading a lemon". He said the same thing about being a nice guy and the judge didn't like it, but he won.
Finally a plaintiff that got 2 warranties so when one didn’t cover the issue with his used car the other did. And he came to court with all his evidence and a witness that he could easily call that could talk to the judge and confirm what was written in the evidence.
Wouldnt trust any of the defendants car lots at this point. If he's been on peoples court twice, imagine how many times he's been in regular court! He buys lemons and barely fixes them.
she was wrong , she ordered the defendant to pay for a brand new motor with no miles on it when the plaintiff originally bought a vehicle with a motor that had 96 k miles on it . the warranty only covers repair costs to an old motor , which would be alot less than the cost of a brand new motor .
I would just like to point out the "Lemon Law" that so often gets quoted by people that buy a junk used car. The lemon law only applies to new cars. You might say why does a NEW car need a lemon law, there should be nothing wrong with it because it is new. This is the point... occasionally you may get a brand-new car that just was not manufactured correctly, and it has persistent ongoing issues. Meaning it was a lemon right from the factory. The lemon law states something to the effect that if a new car needs to have the SAME issue repaired by the dealer within a certain time frame this might indicate that it was not manufactured correctly, and it will continue to be a problem. The law allows you to return the new vehicle for full refund. Lemon Law does not apply to used cars.
That dealer, though. "I gave him a warranty out of the goodness of my heart." No, he gave him a 30 day warranty because it is STATE LAW. I'm also a little concerned that the dealer said the own company "does not exist", when the plaintiff has paperwork with the name of the company all over it......
The warranty company is well within their rights to exclude damage from over heating. A smart person stops driving the car when it gets hot. People, like this guy, keep driving it and damage the engine then get somebody else to pay for it.
Finally a person that was sold a lemon car by a scammer wins! I feel soo bad when ppl get played out of their money and can’t get their money back. Good thing he got a warranty! 🙏🏼
I'm a mechanic. A cylinder head will often crack due to overheating, a head gasket will fail very often due to overheating but I have never seen a cylinder wall crack due to overheating. They usually crack when there isn't enough antifreeze in the system to keep it from freezing. The outside temperature drops down too far causing the coolant to freeze and the wall cracks OR a defect during manufacture that produced a weak spot in the cylinder wall that took some time to show up. The defendant just seems really shady to me. While it would suck as a car dealer to have to warrant the engine it is your responsibility so just do it and don't be an ass,
@@mexicanspec Tough one. Maybe he just hadn't lost enough coolant to notice the issue yet or possibly the cylinder wall was just reaching the point of failure when the man bought the car and it didn't actually crack all the way through until a couple of weeks after he took possession? That 30 day warranty doesn't just cover pre-existing problems though. If the bearings were extremely worn for example but didn't have an actual issue at the time of sale but 3 weeks later one of them failed it should be covered under the warranty. Since the first shop couldn't duplicate the overheating issue but the second shop just a few days later could I suspect that the problem was getting worse very quickly so it might have been fine the day it left the dealer but failed soon after.
A cracked cylinder wall is not something that happens over time. it is an even that causes it, so what was that event and when did it happen?@@1967davethewave
@@mexicanspec A cylinder wall with a defect in the casting can take many miles to show up. As I stated earlier the most common way is a crack due to freezing but when the compression and power events happen in a cylinder it distorts just like a balloon only in extremely small amounts measured in tens of thousands of an inch. A normal cylinder wall will never fail but one with a defect might. The heat in a cylinder is concentrated in the head and the cylinder wall stays 50-70% cooler. So if the engine is hot enough to cause a cylinder to crack then the cylinder head would absolutely melt down at the same time, especially with an aluminum head. They never mentioned which engine was in the car. I would assume the 2.7 since they are the most problematic of the engines available in a 2006 Charger but any engine with a defect can fail early compared with the averages. Maybe you have a different opinion but outside of a freeze issue and a casting defect the only other ways I've ever seen cylinder crack is too much boost, a broken piston where the rod slaps around and cracks the cylinder or excessive detonation caused by a variety of reasons but that usually causes a piston failure first. None of these seem to be the case in this case.
5:07 WRONG! Overheating means that gases are EXPANDING. That means that the combustion chamber is being expanded on beyond its normal shape... that's what cracks the metal. It has NOTHING to do with 'overwork'.
WHEN I HEARD THE OPENING ARGUMENTS I'M LIKE HERE WE GO AGAIN UNTIL I HEARD THE TIMING & MILEAGE OF THE VEHICLE. THE DEFENDANT IS A SCAMMER & LOOOOOSER HOW DARE HE LIE& TRIED TO GET OUT OF PAYING FOR THE ENGINE. HAPPY THAT THE PLAINTIFF WON. HE HAD THE MAJORITY OF ALL HIS EVIDENCE
If the car had a cracked block upon purchase, and was overheating because of it, it would have been caught during the test drive/pre-purchase inspection. In this case, it is more likely that the crack was a RESULT of engine overheating, not a cause of it. If the fault were there from the beginning, the plaintiff would not have driven the car for THREE WEEKS.
For the record I'm a mechanic. I do believe that was the real mechanic on the phone, but he lied to do his customer a favor and also probably knows if the guy wins the money is gonna go to his shop to replace the engine. A cracked cylinder doesn't cause overheating. Overheating absolutely causes cracked cylinders. Guy probably had an intermittent fault like an electric cooling fan that sometimes wouldn't come on when it was supposed to. But when he brought it in to get checked out it functioned properly. When he got it back it started acting up again but he kept driving it. Then the cylinder cracked and he knew it was much worse and took it to his guy. He exacerbated the damage.
The defendants customers are all coming out the wood works on him 😏 but this one I think Judge got it wrong. Driving a car while running hot is what caused that head to crack. He said himself he kept adding water to drive it. He was at fault. The plaintiff just tryna say whatever to get that money back. Of course the shop gonna go along they want to get paid. That was a set up that phone call.
The warranty must state whether certain conduct will void the warranty. For example, selling or transferring the product may void the warranty. Having an unauthorized dealer try to repair the product may void the warranty. Using the product in the wrong way may also void the warranty.
The plaintiff, Mr. Saparino proved himself to be no Sap. The defendant tried a lot of fancy maneuvering/dancing in an attempt to throw the judge off but unfortunately for him, this judge is not easily fooled or scammed. I will say that I definitely thought that the plaintiff was going to lose his case simply because a "used car" is basically sold under an "As Is" rule. Wow.
I feel like they defendant was in cahoots with the Garage that car was towed to and they cooked up a deal where the garage would miraculously find nothing wrong with the car. That way the plaintiff would be driving it around longer and they could blame him for the engine. I am so glad that the judge saw through his lies and his scheme
I’m sure everyone knows this but the way an engine works is by pushing the pistons down making the crank turn. This is done by mini explosions when the air and fuel mix with a spark. So the engine will get hot the coolant travels through the engine and removes some of that heat keeping the engine at a stable operating temperature. If the engine block got cracked coolant can leak out and oil causing the engine to overheat very quickly. There’s no way that guy would be able to drive 5 miles his car would be toast with no coolant.
That is a stretch. If the cylinder is cracked it is cracked. It is more likely the engine was in fine condition until the plaintiff over heated it for what ever reason.@@ryans413
The judge normally does an excellent job with the cases that come before her, but I have seen her do a terrible job with vehicle repair cases. The car could have been overheating because of a bad thermostat, a hole in one of the radiator hoses, a bad relay for the fan, a hole in the radiator, or a bad water pump. When the plaintiff continued driving the car when he knew it was overheating, he could have made the problem much worse which could have caused the crack in the cylinder wall. He said he used it for a couple of days and it started overheating again. She should have checked to see how many miles he put on the car after he bought it. This quite possibly was a bad verdict.
I agree. The plaintiff did drive the car way too much when it was overheating.... a sure way to crack the block/cylinder. The judge came out of left field with this one. But I do see commenters mentioning this defendant has been a defendant at least 3 times on People's Court. Maybe this time the judge got a sniff of something she didn't like. I still say there was no conclusive evidence that the defendant sold the car with the crack already in it. Zero
Great Ruling!! Seems to me the dealer knew something was wrong with that car, as to the reason he paid for the towing and everything else. And yes a cracked head will cause your car to overheat, and most likely a cracked head comes from driving with an overheated engine.
FYI, you can drive a car with a cracked head. I had a 1987 Sentra (that you didn’t even need a key to start lol) that had a cracked head. I’d have to put water in it when it would overheat in a drive thru but we drove it for awhile Edit: I would like to clarify that just because you can doesn’t mean you SHOULD. It was dumb on my part but I was a broke 17 yr old idiot
You can drive a car with a cracked head... I mean, it's not going to run great, and eventually it will cause more and more damage and will stop running at some point. But the statement "you wouldn't drive 20 or 30 miles" is 100% false.
If the Defendant was not a mechanic, then how or why would he be able to know what to do with the car?" The Defendant was responsible for the warranty because it was under 30 days.
The first mechanic prob did see a small crack or the start of one and they hoped it would crutch thru till after the 30 days so they then wouldn’t have to cover it
He talks like this is a game show. "You won on the people court." Disrespects what the judge does. Interviewer is always an asshole to people, and never to ones that need it.
Defendent and his crooked goonies probably knew there was an issue with the engine but ignored it because that's what used car salesman do....They're scammers.
As we all knw we have seen the defendant multiple times, with that being said I thought judges couldn't take a case knowing any of the parties again due to knwing past history with them
You have to take into account that anytime you decide to purchase used products there is a risk. Any vehicle with 96 thousand miles in discussion in this is a waste of time. The plaintiff was lucky to get his money back. Had he been black there's noway he's awarded that money.
If race has nothing to do with a case on The People's Court, you can be sure that Adrian will add a "Had they been Black..." comment and make it about it!
This plaintiff bought a dealership used car 30 day $1.500 dollar rip, off warranty is superseded by the banks warranty .Whaaattt! Bank warranty. None. Totally !Fraudulent defendants dealership run around $1.500 dollar 30 day useless so called warranty. Period
The defendant is a REAL SCAMMER!!! This is the 5th time I've seen him being sued.
But why he came every time he could say no !
What kind of scammer came on tv 5 time 😂😂😂😂😂
@@Jsarmy87124 he gets it paid for by the show. Never has to learn by paying himself. Has dreadful reviews, scammed many people.
@sarahrean7174 bc the show pays he doesn't have to come out of pocket
he's in 1 called Unloading a Lemon th-cam.com/video/7PmPqNIBzJI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HV0xkTf71nwcCh9l
@@spacepanda9037the show doesn’t pay the full judgement, they pay a portion and call it an appearance fund. Still better than nothing
How many times is this defendant going to get sued lol this is his third time in the show
I thought he looked familiar lol
I thought I recognized him!!!!!!
yes i just saw him in another case too 😂
I've seen him a few times myself :p Does anyone remember if he won or lost those prior cases ??
Someone link the other cases please 😂
Fair Ruling. Also loved the fact that he had all the right documents to help his case.
The man cracks his engine and doesn't have to pay for it himself. Not fair at all.
Pretty sure we saw the defendant in another car case.
Edit: Yes, it's a case from two weeks ago called "Unloading a lemon". He said the same thing about being a nice guy and the judge didn't like it, but he won.
Wouldn't be surprised lol
th-cam.com/video/7PmPqNIBzJI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FcHRc-nR4AnIvLNA
I thought he looked familiar. But, I am not good at facial recognition.
I just came here to say that😂
I think so too. When I started watching this episode I thought I was watching one that I had already seen before because of defendant.
This defendant has been sued on this show so many times now 🤣🤣
The defendant clearly don’t care about nothing I swear I’ve seen him on several other episodes before they need to shut his shop down.
Finally a plaintiff that got 2 warranties so when one didn’t cover the issue with his used car the other did. And he came to court with all his evidence and a witness that he could easily call that could talk to the judge and confirm what was written in the evidence.
Wouldnt trust any of the defendants car lots at this point. If he's been on peoples court twice, imagine how many times he's been in regular court! He buys lemons and barely fixes them.
I pray he’s been closed down by now.
The defendant is a sleazy guy in business!!!!!
This is why I like her she makes people stand up and take responsibility even when they’re trying to worm themselves out of it
she was wrong , she ordered the defendant to pay for a brand new motor with no miles on it when the plaintiff originally bought a vehicle with a motor that had 96 k miles on it . the warranty only covers repair costs to an old motor , which would be alot less than the cost of a brand new motor .
I would just like to point out the "Lemon Law" that so often gets quoted by people that buy a junk used car. The lemon law only applies to new cars. You might say why does a NEW car need a lemon law, there should be nothing wrong with it because it is new. This is the point... occasionally you may get a brand-new car that just was not manufactured correctly, and it has persistent ongoing issues. Meaning it was a lemon right from the factory. The lemon law states something to the effect that if a new car needs to have the SAME issue repaired by the dealer within a certain time frame this might indicate that it was not manufactured correctly, and it will continue to be a problem. The law allows you to return the new vehicle for full refund. Lemon Law does not apply to used cars.
That dealer, though.
"I gave him a warranty out of the goodness of my heart."
No, he gave him a 30 day warranty because it is STATE LAW.
I'm also a little concerned that the dealer said the own company "does not exist", when the plaintiff has paperwork with the name of the company all over it......
$ 1500.00 dollars for a warranty that isn't worth the paper it's printed on ,,,
"He got a warranty from someone else, therefore I do not have to honor my warranty."
The warranty company is well within their rights to exclude damage from over heating. A smart person stops driving the car when it gets hot. People, like this guy, keep driving it and damage the engine then get somebody else to pay for it.
'Prestige Motors doesn't exist.' ....oooh boy.
'The motors are working.'
How many does this car have?
Lol this case is bananas already. 🍌🍌🍌
"Ignore the paperwork he has from Prestige Motors"!!!!!
Finally a person that was sold a lemon car by a scammer wins! I feel soo bad when ppl get played out of their money and can’t get their money back. Good thing he got a warranty! 🙏🏼
Wasn't a lemon. Lemon is on NEW CARS. This was just a dumpy car that went bad within the first 30 days and the seller was a bum.
*-The defendant gave me major shifty sneaky vibes. I could tell he was not an honest guy. So glad the plaintiff won*
Lol cant win em all he said how many times u got sued bud 😂
Well, he's been on people's court a couple times ..So I wouldn't be surprised if there are other cases.
Please explain how he drove the car for 3 weeks without it over heating if it had the crack in the engine when he bought it.
Aint he tired of getting sued?
This defendant was in court before
“It’s the case of another case of buyers remorse”🙄🙄🙄
Even worse. The plaintiff kept driving the car even though it was overheating, caused engine failure, and made someone else pay for it.
I'm a mechanic. A cylinder head will often crack due to overheating, a head gasket will fail very often due to overheating but I have never seen a cylinder wall crack due to overheating. They usually crack when there isn't enough antifreeze in the system to keep it from freezing. The outside temperature drops down too far causing the coolant to freeze and the wall cracks OR a defect during manufacture that produced a weak spot in the cylinder wall that took some time to show up. The defendant just seems really shady to me. While it would suck as a car dealer to have to warrant the engine it is your responsibility so just do it and don't be an ass,
mechanic as well . Very well put
Please explain, in your professional opinion, how he drove it for 3 weeks with no problem if the engine was damaged when he bought it.
@@mexicanspec Tough one. Maybe he just hadn't lost enough coolant to notice the issue yet or possibly the cylinder wall was just reaching the point of failure when the man bought the car and it didn't actually crack all the way through until a couple of weeks after he took possession? That 30 day warranty doesn't just cover pre-existing problems though. If the bearings were extremely worn for example but didn't have an actual issue at the time of sale but 3 weeks later one of them failed it should be covered under the warranty. Since the first shop couldn't duplicate the overheating issue but the second shop just a few days later could I suspect that the problem was getting worse very quickly so it might have been fine the day it left the dealer but failed soon after.
A cracked cylinder wall is not something that happens over time. it is an even that causes it, so what was that event and when did it happen?@@1967davethewave
@@mexicanspec A cylinder wall with a defect in the casting can take many miles to show up. As I stated earlier the most common way is a crack due to freezing but when the compression and power events happen in a cylinder it distorts just like a balloon only in extremely small amounts measured in tens of thousands of an inch. A normal cylinder wall will never fail but one with a defect might. The heat in a cylinder is concentrated in the head and the cylinder wall stays 50-70% cooler. So if the engine is hot enough to cause a cylinder to crack then the cylinder head would absolutely melt down at the same time, especially with an aluminum head. They never mentioned which engine was in the car. I would assume the 2.7 since they are the most problematic of the engines available in a 2006 Charger but any engine with a defect can fail early compared with the averages. Maybe you have a different opinion but outside of a freeze issue and a casting defect the only other ways I've ever seen cylinder crack is too much boost, a broken piston where the rod slaps around and cracks the cylinder or excessive detonation caused by a variety of reasons but that usually causes a piston failure first. None of these seem to be the case in this case.
5:07 WRONG! Overheating means that gases are EXPANDING. That means that the combustion chamber is being expanded on beyond its normal shape... that's what cracks the metal. It has NOTHING to do with 'overwork'.
The defendent is definitely a crook
I hate these independent automotive service warranties, there always seems to be an issue when it comes time for a customer to use it....
Defendant comes through the doors and smiles like he is walking onto a stage as MC of the local talent show.
It’s the case of “Charger? He hardly knew her.” 😂😂
WHEN I HEARD THE OPENING ARGUMENTS I'M LIKE HERE WE GO AGAIN UNTIL I HEARD THE TIMING & MILEAGE OF THE VEHICLE. THE DEFENDANT IS A SCAMMER & LOOOOOSER HOW DARE HE LIE& TRIED TO GET OUT OF PAYING FOR THE ENGINE. HAPPY THAT THE PLAINTIFF WON. HE HAD THE MAJORITY OF ALL HIS EVIDENCE
If the car had a cracked block upon purchase, and was overheating because of it, it would have been caught during the test drive/pre-purchase inspection.
In this case, it is more likely that the crack was a RESULT of engine overheating, not a cause of it. If the fault were there from the beginning, the plaintiff would not have driven the car for THREE WEEKS.
Here we go!
If you go before a judge or in casual conversation in general and say “I’m a nice guy!”…. You are not a nice guy! 😂😂😂😂 what a dummy!
This defendant was in another case as well. I just watched it recently I think it was something to do with selling a car with warranty.
No, lemon does apply to used cars. However, it only applies to cars purchased from a registered car dealer, not from a private sale.
No it does not...
@@taurussho86in my state it applies to both new and used as long as the miles are below 125k at the time of purchase.
Lemon Laws are state laws not federal.
@@sunflowerglo5492 that's really good to have that... What state do you live in?
@@deewah1698 yea I just realized it varies per state
For the record I'm a mechanic. I do believe that was the real mechanic on the phone, but he lied to do his customer a favor and also probably knows if the guy wins the money is gonna go to his shop to replace the engine. A cracked cylinder doesn't cause overheating. Overheating absolutely causes cracked cylinders. Guy probably had an intermittent fault like an electric cooling fan that sometimes wouldn't come on when it was supposed to. But when he brought it in to get checked out it functioned properly. When he got it back it started acting up again but he kept driving it. Then the cylinder cracked and he knew it was much worse and took it to his guy. He exacerbated the damage.
100% Agree.
The defendants customers are all coming out the wood works on him 😏 but this one I think Judge got it wrong. Driving a car while running hot is what caused that head to crack. He said himself he kept adding water to drive it. He was at fault. The plaintiff just tryna say whatever to get that money back. Of course the shop gonna go along they want to get paid. That was a set up that phone call.
What a nice guy
The warranty must state whether certain conduct will void the warranty. For example, selling or transferring the product may void the warranty. Having an unauthorized dealer try to repair the product may void the warranty. Using the product in the wrong way may also void the warranty.
This guy screams scammer hahahaha i love it how he tries to hide it
Ayo,what a win 🏆 🙌 👏
😅😅 pretty nice judge
This Bill Christos dude is a SCAMMER! How many times has he been sued?? Put him in jail right away, GEEZ!!!
The defendent is a CLOWN!
I could tell the defendant is crooked as soon as he walked through those doors at the beginning 😂
😁😁 How he gone attempt to quote the law, without actually even knowing the law, (Lemon Law) SMH 💯
Because obviously the government changed the law without letting the people know like always
Let's say the $1500 warranty supercedes your 30 day warranty: it was denied under the $1500 warranty, so it STILL comes back to your 30 day warranty!
The plaintiff, Mr. Saparino proved himself to be no Sap. The defendant tried a lot of fancy maneuvering/dancing in an attempt to throw the judge off but unfortunately for him, this judge is not easily fooled or scammed. I will say that I definitely thought that the plaintiff was going to lose his case simply because a "used car" is basically sold under an "As Is" rule. Wow.
I feel like they defendant was in cahoots with the Garage that car was towed to and they cooked up a deal where the garage would miraculously find nothing wrong with the car. That way the plaintiff would be driving it around longer and they could blame him for the engine. I am so glad that the judge saw through his lies and his scheme
I agree with the result
I’m sure everyone knows this but the way an engine works is by pushing the pistons down making the crank turn. This is done by mini explosions when the air and fuel mix with a spark. So the engine will get hot the coolant travels through the engine and removes some of that heat keeping the engine at a stable operating temperature. If the engine block got cracked coolant can leak out and oil causing the engine to overheat very quickly. There’s no way that guy would be able to drive 5 miles his car would be toast with no coolant.
So explain how he drove it for 3 weeks then.
@@mexicanspec must have not been that bad slow leak or something
That is a stretch. If the cylinder is cracked it is cracked. It is more likely the engine was in fine condition until the plaintiff over heated it for what ever reason.@@ryans413
The judge normally does an excellent job with the cases that come before her, but I have seen her do a terrible job with vehicle repair cases. The car could have been overheating because of a bad thermostat, a hole in one of the radiator hoses, a bad relay for the fan, a hole in the radiator, or a bad water pump. When the plaintiff continued driving the car when he knew it was overheating, he could have made the problem much worse which could have caused the crack in the cylinder wall. He said he used it for a couple of days and it started overheating again. She should have checked to see how many miles he put on the car after he bought it. This quite possibly was a bad verdict.
Disagree, he already took the car in at the shop recommended by the defendant. And was told there was no issue.
I agree. The plaintiff did drive the car way too much when it was overheating.... a sure way to crack the block/cylinder. The judge came out of left field with this one. But I do see commenters mentioning this defendant has been a defendant at least 3 times on People's Court. Maybe this time the judge got a sniff of something she didn't like. I still say there was no conclusive evidence that the defendant sold the car with the crack already in it. Zero
Good ruling
Negligence? Lol 😂
Judge always says “in any event…”
The Defendant is a worm with a mustache.....the warranty that the dealer must give for 30 days is in use before the warranty the customer bought...
Two back to back car purchase cases involving car dealers. This one different from the first one. Bad bad dealer.
You can't add cold fluid to a hot rad.
Great Ruling!! Seems to me the dealer knew something was wrong with that car, as to the reason he paid for the towing and everything else. And yes a cracked head will cause your car to overheat, and most likely a cracked head comes from driving with an overheated engine.
Except this car didn't have a cracked head?
FYI, you can drive a car with a cracked head. I had a 1987 Sentra (that you didn’t even need a key to start lol) that had a cracked head. I’d have to put water in it when it would overheat in a drive thru but we drove it for awhile Edit: I would like to clarify that just because you can doesn’t mean you SHOULD. It was dumb on my part but I was a broke 17 yr old idiot
You can drive a car with a cracked head... I mean, it's not going to run great, and eventually it will cause more and more damage and will stop running at some point. But the statement "you wouldn't drive 20 or 30 miles" is 100% false.
If the Defendant was not a mechanic, then how or why would he be able to know what to do with the car?" The Defendant was responsible for the warranty because it was under 30 days.
WHY DOES THE DEFENDANT LOOK SO FAMILIAR!!???? Stg I just watched him on another case!😂
He keep coming back 😂😂😂
The first mechanic prob did see a small crack or the start of one and they hoped it would crutch thru till after the 30 days so they then wouldn’t have to cover it
Yay!🎉
Ewww the defend gives such creepy vibes
He talks like this is a game show. "You won on the people court." Disrespects what the judge does. Interviewer is always an asshole to people, and never to ones that need it.
Oh my goodness look at all you master Mechanics crawling out from under your rocks in these comments 😂😂
Omg I thought he looked familiar
People are so ignorant and think they know everything. A lemon is a brand new car NOT A used CAR!!!
You are the ignorant one you kept saying d!mb things.
Or being a borderline racist
$3900 for a new engine???? Seriously????
He got screwed for sure.
You get what you pay for
If it has a crack in the head all thay have to do is get a used head or bring it to a machine shop
Every charger is a lemon lol
Another dishonest auto scammer bites the dust.
You don't slip much past Judge Milian.😉
And he's got a pretty gf. Win win
Hmmm the defendant looks familiar
First problem is buying a Dodge
Here❤❤❤
Defendent and his crooked goonies probably knew there was an issue with the engine but ignored it because that's what used car salesman do....They're scammers.
If there was a problem with the engine, how did the plaintiff drive it for 3 weeks with no problems?
How many times are people gonna lose these types of cases before they realize AS IS means AS IS.
He had a warranty so what are you speaking about. Maybe watch the episode before commenting.
😂 Idiot
He won the case.
DEALER warranty. Defendant lost the case.
The first time I saw judge Millian rule in favor for a used car to plaintiff 🎉. He was under warranty
Seen it a good 6 times when they have a decent warranty they paid for.
Stupid people keep bringing up LEMON LAW. LEMON LAW applies to NEW CARS.
I wanted to see who was clapping for the plaintiff 😂
he is a nice guy....Used car sales......must be a Democrat.
As we all knw we have seen the defendant multiple times, with that being said I thought judges couldn't take a case knowing any of the parties again due to knwing past history with them
kewl audience
lol does that sooound like a mechanic
All car dealership are the same. I hate car dealership and their add on warranties and taxes
You have to take into account that anytime you
decide to purchase used products there is a risk. Any vehicle with 96 thousand miles in discussion in this is a waste of time. The plaintiff was lucky to get his money back. Had he been black there's noway he's awarded that money.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡
Lol you are hilarious. U almost had me fooled til I got to the very last sentence 😂
If race has nothing to do with a case on The People's Court, you can be sure that Adrian will add a "Had they been Black..." comment and make it about it!
You know nothing about cars, do you?
Now you've decided to insert race into a case without a black litigant. Sad little man.
She is so sick of seeing his face in her court room 😂😂😂. Ugh I can’t
This plaintiff bought a dealership used car 30 day $1.500 dollar rip, off warranty is superseded by the banks warranty .Whaaattt! Bank warranty. None. Totally !Fraudulent defendants dealership run around $1.500 dollar 30 day useless so called warranty. Period