That theory would not be out of line, and it's very possible the Dursley's normal antagonistic attitude toward anything magical would have been enhanced by Harry being a horcrux. All the other theories mentioned here are simply ridiculous at best.
Of course, every piece of evidence connecting Miss Poppins to Hogwarts could be explained by Mary Travers having written these thingsfifty years before J K Rowling started...
@@marshallpeters7174But while at school (or on the hunt, as the case may be), Ron and Hermione didn't act the same way all the time like that, although he was a horcrux- and what's interesting is that Voldemort never knew Harry was!
Muggles (non magical humans) hated the magic humans, as the force senstive individuals were by the non force users, and mutants/inhumans marvel universe are hated by normal people.
A phoenix as a horcrux would be an especially bad idea given that the animal is completely consumed by its own fire every so often. The new bird that rises from the ashes is for all practical reasoning no longer the same bird. The horcrux isn't going to transfer to the egg that gets laid anymore than Harry's scar would come off with new layers of skin growth. My thoughts as to why Fawkes saved Harry is because Fawkes had bonded with Harry. It had nothing to do with loyalty to Dumbledore.
Well, Dumbledore did tell Harry he must have shown extreme loyalty to call Fawkes to him. Aside from that, though, creating a horcrux requires a deliberate act of murder, which Dumbledore would never have done. Ariana's death was an accident.
When Fawkes bursts into flames and is reborn in the ashes it doesn't lay an egg. Also, it's most certainly the same bird. Ya know Fawkes blocks for Dumbledore and tanked a killing curse during the ministry duel between Dumbledore and Voldemort. Just immediately becomes a chick once more.
@@nhansen197 When Harry Potter first encountered Fawles, it was just ahead of its burning. So, Harry was the last/first human it saw before/after its burning. With that, Fawkes “imprinted” with the image/neural connection of Harry from its first by sight/breath/thought. Harry had a feather of Fawkes in his wand. When Riddle picked up Harry’s wand, Fawkes could feel the change in magical intention. Enough for Fawkes to know that Harry was in trouble. When Harry expressed his loyalty to Dumbledore, Fawkes had all “he” needed to respond. And I am certain that Dumbledore gave Fawkes the hat for Harry, knowing the legends about Godric Gryffindore.
Hermione takes notes in the book in the books a scene never shown in movies but Ron gives reference clue of it in the book she would copy something necessary if she found it important to know not rip a page out of a book. The page in the movie has no sign of having a ripped edge.
The love potion theory for Ginny is extremely easy to debunk. Among many, many counterarguments, I'll mention just one: potion-induced love doesn't last, the target has to be fed new doses of the potion all the time (as proven by Tom Riddle Sr. rejecting Merope once her potion wore off). But Harry's affection for Ginny survives a whole year in which they were barely in touch, and when she certainly couldn't feed him new doses of the potion. So even if Ginny gave him a couple of doses, causing his initial attraction (and there are problem with that theory too), it only explains the initial infatuation; it doesn't come close to explaining how that turned into a love strong enough to get them married with kids
Plus, Harry didn't act like someone on a love potion, we see this when Ron eats the chocolate laced with the Love Potion meant for Harry, someone on Love Potion acts more obsessed with the person who gives it to them than in love with them, and Harry didn't act that way with Ginny. He didn't act obsessed.
@@saphiramystique2086 Indeed. All of Harry's soul-searching -- his inner dialogues when he tried to stop himself from approaching Ginny because she's Ron's sister -- wouldn't have happened if he'd been under the influence of a love potion
Harry and Cho dated during order of the phoenix, and their relationship didn’t work out. Harry didn’t forget her, he merely realized she wasn’t right for him. Ginny was a better match because she could understand what he had gone through with Voldemort in a way that Cho could not. Plus he’d known Ginny longer and they were already friends.
@@malloryjones5393 um ginny was still barely able to talk to harry till around the time of dumbledore's army training in book 5. Cho and harry already broke up by that point. Also the only things ginny has going for her is she is good at quidditch she has a similar experience with tom, and have a connection with Ron (arguably Harry's best friend). There are signs of both Hermione and harry being potioned by ginny and ron in book 6 as well. There are a few types of love potions in hp universe. Amortencia is stated to be the strongest one though. Then there are a few other emotion/behavioral based potions as well. So despite the fact it's never explicitly stated within the books or movies there is a high probability of loyalty potions jealousy potions and a few other types that could explain some of the events in book 6 between the four. Namely Hermione and Harry suddenly becoming jealous of Ron and Ginny. Then Hermione's behavior toward the book about the half blood Prince. The majority of these behavioral potions show up in book 3 and 6 loyalty potion for Hermione toward Dumbledore explains her devotion to him despite the fact she realizes by this point he's very fallible. These are situations that can be explained by potions like these.
@TraciPeteyforlife I disagree both Ginny and Harry have suffered being possessed by Tom Riddle Luna never did so it would be impossible for her to comprehend Harry's experience like Ginny would and Ginny has proven herself very capable of easily calming Harry at times when He's on edge. They are able to connect on a far more personal level and that is hinted toward on screen. The same thing goes for Cho which is actually her last name Chang is her first never experienced being possessed by Tom Riddle either.
Harry as a horcrux effects the Dursley's behavior: Possible. But why then is it only them? How is it that Harry gets along so well with Prof. Mcgonagall, or Prof. Flitwick? How is it that he develops many friends in his class, and indeed becomes quidditch captain in his sixth year, or becomes such an effective student teacher and leader of Dumbledore's Army?
This theory is easily debunked by reading the first chapter of Philosopher/Sorcerer’s which shows that the Dureleys didn't change any after Harry came to live with them, it's not just what McGonagall said, that chapter actually shows things from the Dursley’s POV, in the beginning, and there is a scene with Vernon yelling at his employees at work for no reason, the same way he treats Harry later on, there's also Marge Dursely in POA, she was hardly around Harry, and treated him the same if not worse than Vernon, which also shows, that the Horcrux had nothing to do with it, the Dursleys were just awful people.
I would've thought that the most mentally susceptible to a Horcrux would be Sirius when Harry and he first meet and he doesn't seem to be affected at all.
About Nagini... We know that Nagini is a venomous snake...see when Arthur was taken to Mungo's after the snake attack at the ministry. A pytkon does not have poison...it strangles it prey.
Problem with the horcrux-affected-Dursleys theory: Once Harry started attending Hogwarts, several people at Hogwarts -- especially Ron Weasley -- spent more time with him than the Dursleys. Harry never returned to them during the mid-year breaks, and several of his summer breaks, while starting at Privet Drive, ended at the Burrow (or, in one case, Diagon Alley). So the Dursleys' exposure to the Harry-Hocrcux decreased, whereas Ron's (and others') increased. Yet the horcrux didn't affect them: we *know* what Ron's behaviour under such influence was like, and it only happened when he was exposed to the locket in Book 7
‘When Voldemort made Harry into a Horcrux in Godric's Hollow, he didn’t perform any rituals either’ - how do you know? He did plan to murder two current and one future rival according to the prophecy. It’s absolutely plausible he came prepared. What is not plausible that every death by magic creates a Horcrux. That would be quite a mess.
The snake in the terrarium was way too small to be a maladictus. Even as a young adult, Nagini would have been a normal size human, but at that weight would have been a huge snake. Harry’s interaction with the zoo snake only foreshadowed his capacity for parseltongue. Something that would come into play in Harry’s second year.
If Harry and Hermione were siblings Harry could have lived at the Granger home instead of the Dursleys and still been protected by his mother's protection magic. He would have been an entirely different character.
In regards to Marry Poppins being at Hogwarts is a quite convincing theory, I like it. It makes sense. As for Hermione and Harry being siblings, I would so get behind it. But it's so not possible. Hermione is a few months older than Harry so it's just not possible, but their relationship does seem to be that of brother and sister, ge even said so in DEATHKY HALLOWS to Ron when (he ) Ron came back, "I think of her as a sister, and I reckon she sees me the same way." Man, I wish they were siblings.
Regarding Harry and Hermione being siblings, I don't think the birthdays would be a big issue, given that it is only a matter of record and they would already have required someone (probably just Harry's parents and Dumbledore) having to create a fake life for her already. They would almost certainly have to be fraternal twins, in which case it would not make sense to leave them with the same birthday, which would raise everyone's eyebrows. If that theory were to be true, the goal would have had to have been to hide her for safety. It was publically known that the Potters had a child, so there was no point hiding both of them, but if even they were surprised by having twins, it might have made sense to hide one of them with a muggle family. Some minor memory and public records altering would be no trouble, so there would certainly be a name change and a different birthday and maybe even minor physical changes. Maybe they even intended to reclaim her after the war had they survived.
If Hermione and Harry were twins hidden at Birth in separate households she could simply be pretending to have a different birthday as part of the secret
@@StarShadowPrimal I love how you tied up the necessities of this theory. It ties up so well, it could fit. This could further explain why Crookshanks took so quickly to Hermione, he knew she is a Potter, and who was Crookshanks owned by? The Potters. So that now fully is how it ought to be. Thank you.
I think Ginny might have used a magic perfume to get Harry's attention but then had to use her own natural charm afterwards. Harry and Hermione's birthdays are only ten months apart. Irish twins?
Here is my theory: Arthur Weasley is the brother of Endora and Clara, seen in Bewitched. Notice thar Endora has red hair and can appear and disappear by magic. Clara is very good at traveling by fireplace, and often drops down Samantha's fireplace to visit. She also loves mortals and is the only of Samantha's relatives to accept Darrin. Also, bith Endora and Clara admit that they grew up- and when to school- in England, Maurice has a heavy English accent, and wants to see hus grandchildren go to his old schools, which does include Hogwarts- Clara, Endora and Maurice are Hogwarts graduates!
Understand my oddity in this, but I think that the Evans girls’ grandmother may have been sister to Hermione’s great-grandmother. That would have made them cousins. Too close for marriage, but close enough for family. Draco might have heard of the basilisk in old legends, and put old “boogie-man tales” to keep kids in line with the symptoms of petrifaction. He then took down a text that described a basilisk, extracted the article, and left it in a history of Salazar Slytherin, looking for clues about “The Chamber of Secrets”. This would have led her to more information about the basilisk, including its adaptation to size and shape of occupied chambers. This was an attribute noted by Newt Scamander concerning certain magical creatures. Given those clues, she (rightly) concluded that the basilisk was traversing the (sewage) pipes.
@@Leon-w5h That first one would be easier to get behind- we don't know more than 1 generation back on those specific family lines, so who knows? After all, Hermione was going to have a younger sister maybe about Ginny's age (maybe younger) but JK ultimately decided not to have the younger sister in there of course. (I think it was found in her old notes) Maybe this would be a way of compensating, but who knows?
Mary poppins isn’t a witch, she’s a time lord. Her carpet bag is bigger on the inside, she has a sonic umbrella and can talk to animals. She’s a time lord.
I always wondered why they didn't find that paper in hermione's hand right away. When she was petrified. I thought the professors would check to see if their were any clues.
The artwork in this video is so spine chillingly BEAUTIFUL ALL OF IT KUDUS to all the artists Well worth preserving in a book on its own I LOVE THE ARTWORK
Something I’ve noticed that I’ve never heard anyone else address in all these years is an inconsistency that has to do with nearly headless Nick. In book 1 during the welcoming feast Nick says to Harry when he watches Harry cut up his steak, “I haven’t eaten for nearly 400 years.” Notice how Nick say “nearly 40O” and not just 400. Now, fast forward to year and book 2 when Nearly headless Nick invites Harry, Ron, and Hermione to his death day party. Nick says it will be his 500 death day. How in one year did Nick go from nearly 400 years to exactly 500 years? If Nick had said he hadn’t eaten in 400 years instead of saying “nearly 400 years” one could possibly make the argument that ghost “age” ( is that the right word) differently than living beings. This is just a loop hole that I notice when rereading or re-listening to the Harry Potter books and to my knowledge no one talks about it nor do I think J.K Rowling has addressed the question on Potter more. Anyone who sees this and has either noticed this loop hole, or goes back to check on this after reading my comment tell me what you think about this.
Even if dumbldore had a hourcrux, what you’re saying is he is still around and has found a way to survive without killing unicorns. On the the other hand we learned in fantastic beasts that he did have a deep drive for power though it may have been for the right reasons that can open up the opportunity to dive deeper into dark magic
1. Debunked (although it almost makes sense!) Besides, they're almost never in the conversation simultaneously. 2. Reasonable, but unknown as far as I know 3. Heard this one- others have pointed out this is just a "Luke and Leia" situation! But as far as I know, JK *was* planning on having Hermione have a sister who was also magical... until (I think) she realized how much it would slow things down. But why is Hermione wearing Hufflepuff robes at 5:20? 4. Makes sense- debunked, though 5. Heard this one... 6. Interesting! Don't know, though. 7. Never heard this whole theory, but why isn't the same true of Ron and Hermione in the rest of the *entire* series?! 8. Nagini's a human... so I don't think so. It must just foreshadow the Dueling Club scene and his Parseltongue ability.
Theory 7 doesn't hold water, before Harry was dropped at the Dursley's, there was a scene in the book following Vernon, who was already an intolerant boorish lout, it was therefore established behavior.
Marry Poppins' relationship with Hogwarts is just...WTF? Rowling wasn't even alive when Poppins first entered the scene, so how can they even be connected? Video title says 7, while there are 8. Interesting. The 8th topic is very clearly debunked by not only the snake having a male voice actor, but by the fact that the snake itself points Harry's attention to the sign near him stating 'born and raised in captivity.'
I have heard another impossible theory, the Horntail harry faced in the tournament was Norbert, this can instantly be debunked, Norbert was a Norwegian Ridgeback, not a Horntail.
I couldn't stick behind that 1.That Miley, Granger and Harry are brother's sister.But that would mean that Perry and Mimi's mother and father is also his mother and father.I mean , her father and mother , you get what I mean
Tldr at bottom I have heard the theory that harry wasn't a true horcrux cuz horcrux are said to be inanimate objects. Meaning harry can't be a true horcrux. He is something similar to a Jinchuriki from Naruto though. I say this cuz horcrux have been know to take possession and even influence them yet the soul piece never showed sians of being able to do so. Then fact it is infact a fragment of tom riddle's soul is shown though the link tom uses to influence harry. All this can also support the ron being Dumbledore as well do to his lazy and greedy nature. Aka if ron and Dumbledore are one the same it just adds to the list of shady thing about Dumbledore. There is a long list of shady things about Dumbledore, and the rumor about Molly Weasley potioning Arthur has some evidence as well. Which is another shady thing to the list(her being one dumbledore's most fanatical followers). I can keep going on and on about all the shady things about dumbledore and some of the people closest to him, but i won't. Tldr here: theory that harry is a false horcrux is both plausible, and adds to ron and dumbledore being one in the same. It also adds to theory of Dumbledore being a dark lord hiding in plain site. PS:I personally think dumbledore is either a hidden Dark Lord or a complete moron that is just obscenely misguided (I lean to the former). I also don't believe the ron being Dumbledore. I just thought I'd point out though that the false horcrux theory is factor that adds to it. I also think harry is a false horcrux.
I must have taken 50 something screenshots 😂😂 I was thinking to add visuals to my harry Potter book collection And then mKe my baby brother read I think he will enjoy it more This way
Big fly in the ointment on the Mary Poppins theory is that Harry Potter's world didn't even exist when Mary Poppins came out. Two separate worlds although.
Well said...sometimes there are some good theories but otherwise I just try to enjoy stuff rather to rationalize everything as if it was a massive puzzle to solve.
Sorry but ron is dumbledore makes little sense since we know how dumnbledor grew up, and that he had a brother and a sister. We actually meet the brother and see paintings of the sister, so they are nmot some made up legend to hide who he truly is. We know some things about his childhood even. I can see that making sense when the first few books came out, but not with what we know now. But I really love the marry poppins one
Im wondering if the dursleys are effected by the horocrux. I mean Take Ron, neville, and the other boys in his room. They live also months with Harry in one small room. Seeing how fast Ron got effected during the last book, they also should have shown at least some little signs I think. But honestly still don't really know how human horocruxes work. Im always wondering about how its possible no one got effected by harry even tho they literally sleep less than 2 meters apart from each other for the bigger part of 6 YEARS. At the very least Ron and Neville should be effected because how much he hangs out with them In case of the phoenix, wouldn't the fire destroy the horocrox? I know normal fire doesn't work, but I don't think the fire of a phoenix is normal fire. It seems magical just like the fire in the room of requierments.
The first chapter in the first book debunks the theory that the Durselys were affected by the Horcrux, it shows the Durselys before Harry is left on their doorstep, and they are just as awful as they are when Harry comes to live with them, nothing in their attitude changes.
I had a theory like this once too. It went like this Hermione was born in 1979, just a year before Harry. What if James and lilly decided to send her away to be safe since she was born first they might thought she might've been the child in the prophecy. And Voldemort would've never thought that child in the prophecy would be muggle born. She also seems to empressive with everything for being muggle born
Fan theories are almost always ridiculous, none more so than the ron dumbledore crap. I mean christ talk about building a house out of straw. These people have to much time on their hands
That theory never made sense to me. People who believe that theory forget the fact Molly gave birth to Ron, he didn't just appear at the Burrow one day, and Molly and Arthur not realize they had an extra kid in the house, they didn't have that many kids lol
Hermione tore the book in case she was petrified. She knew she was in danger as a muggle-born and had the page as a backup. And damaging a book isn't too bad when you know reparo
Can someone tell me why Dumbledore has 5 long fingers? Yes we all have 5 fingers on each hand but his is five longer fingers Index maybe another one or it's two middle fingers or two ring fingers or two pinky fingers? If you don't know what I'm talking about look at the timestamp 17:25 and you will see what I'm talking about.
What is this new obsession with labeling Mary Poppins a witch? She is not a witch. Yet everyone calls her one and assumes she is, ignoring the movies and books.
You massively botched that first theroy its not that dumbledore went back and became ron its that ron grew up then went back and became dumbledore, its implying dumbledore is part of a bootstrap paradox
Neither theory makes sense, as both of their families are quite well documented. As to Dumbledore becoming Ron, like this video says; a time-turner doesn't make you younger.
Fans can sometimes simply outwrite the author's. This is one of those occasions of tan's unbelievable minds. That being said, JK's entire story for Snape was on a different level, and no one on earth came all that was coming with that. There's probably 1 million+ "Always." tattoos on the ankles, backs, and wrists of girls (and I hate tattoos) but this is one I have seen a zillion times and not only accepts bit approve. It's one of the greatest examples of loves I have ever seen. Married 16 years to the love of my life, now separated (but not divorced) for 10 months. I find myself thinking of what Snape said over and over in that scene. Sometimes, no matter what, even if she eventually gets with another man and has a family, my heart still says my love is "Always". Untouchable. I can't help it, no matter what. To love someone you have lost and still, eternally love. I understand now, Snape. That takes the strongest man and love I have ever seen. The only thing greater would be the love of the Lord himself. I still dream of her calling me and walking back through the door. She either will in this life or the next. I love you Veronica, my soulmate
All of these theories to me are conspiracy theories, with as little practical connective tissue as conspiracies. I couldn't stop laughing at all of them as I also laugh at conspiracy theories, or theories without any reliable scientific basis such as flat Earthers. I can see no way that these theories would stand up to real scrutiny and that the fans are the only people that hold them. The Mary Poppins (I will include Nanny McPhee in this) really had me rolling, yes I can see how she could have been schooled at Hogwarts but how did she escape without the Ministry getting involved, she would have been jailed in Azkaban for deliberately revealing magic to the muggle world on a repeated basis. Much as I enjoyed this video, as a fan of the series I cannot agree with any of the theories. Of course, that is only my personal opinion.
I love the idea of Harry and Hermione being brother and sister. 😍 And the Mary Poppins theory is simply adorable! 🩷 I also have a theory... Well, it's more of a simple headcanon, but here it goes: Remus Lupin never got intimate with anyone before Tonks, because of his furry little problem... And that was another strong motive for him to reject her and acting so off-charcter when it camed to her. After all, it was a very sensitive matter for him, who was in his mid-30s and had decides long ago that he would never get involved with anyone, because he was too dangerous.
I loved the movies and the books. With each book the style of the writing changed. Which I have my own theory on. I disagree that Draco was trying to help anyone. You’re giving his character too much credit for intelligence which he does not possess. He’s just a bully. The Dursley’s are like typical families today that have to take in a child they don’t want. They make the child’s livfe a living hell and torture them. We read many stories in the news like this. I’ve known a few myself. As far as a horcrux in Harry.. The Dursley’s had an agreement with Dumbledore to take him, hide him. So I’m sure there was a spell that was cast to protect them. I think your artwork with your presentation was amazing. The pictures were absolutely beautiful. Fans need to remember one thing it is just a book or a set of books. Sometimes we become so immersed in something because we find our own life unsatisfactory. Though I do believe that there are some that can do real magic.
I have a therory that harry became a horcrux is that Voldemort promised snape to spare Lilly hence him giving her a chance but when she died from his spell it created a horcrux and killed him her sacrifice and love for harry creating a protection for harry
To me, I always thought, hermione granger and harry were meant to be to gether, but I see why it was Ginny instead. However, on a different note; I don't have a problem with the first fan theory.
Seems to many people have got too much time on their hands to waste dreaming up so many BS theories Video proves it (not the narrator) He tell us and we lie on the ground killing ourselves with laughter with the idiocy these people have of the Harry Potter world The Phoenix theory is the only one that “might” hold water The others, total BS
Though I find it interesting about Mary Poppins it has me thinking now since the bus used in Harry Potter movies is also seen in Halloween Town as well as the Grandma's bag also was deep as well. Though there was a certain time of year that she could visit her family in the human world the same bus was used with the same kind of bus stop as in Harry Potter stories. Although Grandma's bag walked would be that she enchanted the bag to follow her I would say she was in Gryffindor but I could be wrong but it does have me thinking of that.
Harry Potter as horcrux is true if you read the books or watch the films but to suggest that this is the reason that the dursley's were abusive too him is wrong and I should know as a person who was abused people who are abusers don't need a reason to abuse someone they do it for the sick gratification it gives them to see another person in pain simply because they enjoy seeing other people in pain making them feel like a waste of space . So stop making excuses for abusers it just enables them to do more harm !
I’ve always felt like Dumbledore had a slight favoring of Severus. But because of Lily he would never be able to be with Severus. So there then emerged an “enmity” that would never truly be understood until the events of The Half Blood Prince. This is when Albus administered his own death via the one he can never tell why.
Ron is not Dumbledore. Dumbledore is Ron. There is a big difference. Ron Weasley was born as Ron Weasley. After Voldemort won the Second Wizarding War and took control over all the Earth, Ron went back in time and aged himself down, then magicked the memories of the Dumbledore family in order to become one. He chose them because they were not a family of note. Then, as a Dumbledore, he was able to guide Harry to victory. That's also why Albus was so talented as a youth - he already had a lifetime of experience.
The first four books of the Harry Potter series were translated into 'American' which meant if you had the American version it said lemon drop. It was so annoying that even as an American, I ended up buying the English versions of the books.
@@missanne2908 I think there were changes in all the books, though I may be mistaken. The first book was certainly the most changed, even the title. I also have the British version of the books.
Interesting theories of intriguing things, the one or half a dozen of the same things could exist in the shadows of Hogwarts Castle, and if this has been mentioned but H features a lot of the books of course Harry and Hemione having a similar name, Harry comes from Harold and Hermione is possible a Norse origin or German origins so this is odd they have H in their names where others in Harry Potter seem to use other letters in the alphabet but it's some hidden meaning in names that usually contain mysteries or family connections and false history. Potter has connections with rivers and clay and names exist because of trade or what people did. So maybe Hermione name has hidden meaning as does Harry's and most of the magical world of JKR. Guess the mystery will never be solved until he returns again the one who can be mentioned you see history can sometimes repeat itself especially while magic exists and something still lingers in Hogwarts that broken wand the power of magic is hard to break, and possibly ghosts still walk?
herere is a teory that makes more sense regarding the Dursleys...they were clearly Narcissists - having lived around Narcissistic people for many years in my youth over those years I learned to recognise the characteristics of Narcissism...food for thought
Hogwash... no way is Harry Hermione's brother that is total nonsense... I also find it extremely harfd to believe that ron weasley & professor Dumbledore are the same person..that in it'self is a total impssibility considering that both Ron & Dumbledore were seen together many times during the frianchise...
Yeah phoenixes might be immortal, but their boddies get destroyed after all as they burn to nothin but ashes. Not sure a potential horcrux could survive this process 🤔..
Honestly I kinda like the theory of Harry and Hermoine being siblings. I could see Lily and James Potter separating the twins to make it harder for Voldemort to find and kill both of them, and turned their daughter over to the Grangers who were old family friends, since Voldemort wouldn't think to look too closely at muggles.
I entirely understand why Rowling is stunned by these theories, though I find the idea that Mary Poppins went to Hogwarts quite charming. 🤣🤣🤣
I like Theory no. 7: V’s soul that was part of Harry influenced the Dursley’s actions to Harry
That theory would not be out of line, and it's very possible the Dursley's normal antagonistic attitude toward anything magical would have been enhanced by Harry being a horcrux. All the other theories mentioned here are simply ridiculous at best.
Of course, every piece of evidence connecting Miss Poppins to Hogwarts could be explained by Mary Travers having written these thingsfifty years before J K Rowling started...
@@marshallpeters7174But while at school (or on the hunt, as the case may be), Ron and Hermione didn't act the same way all the time like that, although he was a horcrux- and what's interesting is that Voldemort never knew Harry was!
I like the idea that wonka went to Hogwarts
This isn't Star Wars. Hermione isn't Harry's sister
My thoughts exactly
It is just a theory
@@krisangelicasoria5243 yeah
haha when I saw the thumbnail text that was the first thing I thought. "Why you trying to starwars this thing up" lol
Muggles (non magical humans) hated the magic humans, as the force senstive individuals were by the non force users, and mutants/inhumans marvel universe are hated by normal people.
A phoenix as a horcrux would be an especially bad idea given that the animal is completely consumed by its own fire every so often. The new bird that rises from the ashes is for all practical reasoning no longer the same bird. The horcrux isn't going to transfer to the egg that gets laid anymore than Harry's scar would come off with new layers of skin growth. My thoughts as to why Fawkes saved Harry is because Fawkes had bonded with Harry. It had nothing to do with loyalty to Dumbledore.
Well, Dumbledore did tell Harry he must have shown extreme loyalty to call Fawkes to him. Aside from that, though, creating a horcrux requires a deliberate act of murder, which Dumbledore would never have done. Ariana's death was an accident.
When Fawkes bursts into flames and is reborn in the ashes it doesn't lay an egg. Also, it's most certainly the same bird. Ya know Fawkes blocks for Dumbledore and tanked a killing curse during the ministry duel between Dumbledore and Voldemort. Just immediately becomes a chick once more.
@@nhansen197 When Harry Potter first encountered Fawles, it was just ahead of its burning. So, Harry was the last/first human it saw before/after its burning. With that, Fawkes “imprinted” with the image/neural connection of Harry from its first by sight/breath/thought. Harry had a feather of Fawkes in his wand. When Riddle picked up Harry’s wand, Fawkes could feel the change in magical intention. Enough for Fawkes to know that Harry was in trouble. When Harry expressed his loyalty to Dumbledore, Fawkes had all “he” needed to respond. And I am certain that Dumbledore gave Fawkes the hat for Harry, knowing the legends about Godric Gryffindore.
These comments pretty much sum up everything I was going to say…
Hermione takes notes in the book in the books a scene never shown in movies but Ron gives reference clue of it in the book she would copy something necessary if she found it important to know not rip a page out of a book. The page in the movie has no sign of having a ripped edge.
The love potion theory for Ginny is extremely easy to debunk. Among many, many counterarguments, I'll mention just one: potion-induced love doesn't last, the target has to be fed new doses of the potion all the time (as proven by Tom Riddle Sr. rejecting Merope once her potion wore off). But Harry's affection for Ginny survives a whole year in which they were barely in touch, and when she certainly couldn't feed him new doses of the potion. So even if Ginny gave him a couple of doses, causing his initial attraction (and there are problem with that theory too), it only explains the initial infatuation; it doesn't come close to explaining how that turned into a love strong enough to get them married with kids
Plus, Harry didn't act like someone on a love potion, we see this when Ron eats the chocolate laced with the Love Potion meant for Harry, someone on Love Potion acts more obsessed with the person who gives it to them than in love with them, and Harry didn't act that way with Ginny. He didn't act obsessed.
@@saphiramystique2086 Indeed. All of Harry's soul-searching -- his inner dialogues when he tried to stop himself from approaching Ginny because she's Ron's sister -- wouldn't have happened if he'd been under the influence of a love potion
Thanks I never gave him love potion
Harry and Cho dated during order of the phoenix, and their relationship didn’t work out. Harry didn’t forget her, he merely realized she wasn’t right for him. Ginny was a better match because she could understand what he had gone through with Voldemort in a way that Cho could not. Plus he’d known Ginny longer and they were already friends.
@@malloryjones5393 Didn't Cho betray Harry and his friends?
@@malloryjones5393 um ginny was still barely able to talk to harry till around the time of dumbledore's army training in book 5. Cho and harry already broke up by that point. Also the only things ginny has going for her is she is good at quidditch she has a similar experience with tom, and have a connection with Ron (arguably Harry's best friend). There are signs of both Hermione and harry being potioned by ginny and ron in book 6 as well. There are a few types of love potions in hp universe. Amortencia is stated to be the strongest one though. Then there are a few other emotion/behavioral based potions as well. So despite the fact it's never explicitly stated within the books or movies there is a high probability of loyalty potions jealousy potions and a few other types that could explain some of the events in book 6 between the four. Namely Hermione and Harry suddenly becoming jealous of Ron and Ginny. Then Hermione's behavior toward the book about the half blood Prince. The majority of these behavioral potions show up in book 3 and 6 loyalty potion for Hermione toward Dumbledore explains her devotion to him despite the fact she realizes by this point he's very fallible. These are situations that can be explained by potions like these.
@@Foolish188She was under truth serium influence cho didn't do it on purpose
I still think Luna was better for Harry.
@TraciPeteyforlife I disagree both Ginny and Harry have suffered being possessed by Tom Riddle Luna never did so it would be impossible for her to comprehend Harry's experience like Ginny would and Ginny has proven herself very capable of easily calming Harry at times when He's on edge. They are able to connect on a far more personal level and that is hinted toward on screen. The same thing goes for Cho which is actually her last name Chang is her first never experienced being possessed by Tom Riddle either.
In the books, the snake Harry liberated was a Brazilian boa constrictor, not a Burmese python. The snake was changed in the movies to a python.
Harry as a horcrux effects the Dursley's behavior: Possible. But why then is it only them? How is it that Harry gets along so well with Prof. Mcgonagall, or Prof. Flitwick? How is it that he develops many friends in his class, and indeed becomes quidditch captain in his sixth year, or becomes such an effective student teacher and leader of Dumbledore's Army?
They wouldn't be as influenced by magic as the dursleys
The Dursley’s lived with him 24/7 for 11 years and he only saw the kids for 7-8 months and not as close
This theory is easily debunked by reading the first chapter of Philosopher/Sorcerer’s which shows that the Dureleys didn't change any after Harry came to live with them, it's not just what McGonagall said, that chapter actually shows things from the Dursley’s POV, in the beginning, and there is a scene with Vernon yelling at his employees at work for no reason, the same way he treats Harry later on, there's also Marge Dursely in POA, she was hardly around Harry, and treated him the same if not worse than Vernon, which also shows, that the Horcrux had nothing to do with it, the Dursleys were just awful people.
If it is possible it might only enhance negative feelings if they are already present
Which could explain Draco & Snape’s feelings towards him
I would've thought that the most mentally susceptible to a Horcrux would be Sirius when Harry and he first meet and he doesn't seem to be affected at all.
About Nagini...
We know that Nagini is a venomous snake...see when Arthur was taken to Mungo's after the snake attack at the ministry.
A pytkon does not have poison...it strangles it prey.
venomous
@@chew1511 Thanks for correction. English is not my own language.
Nagini is a mixed hybrid
Problem with the horcrux-affected-Dursleys theory: Once Harry started attending Hogwarts, several people at Hogwarts -- especially Ron Weasley -- spent more time with him than the Dursleys. Harry never returned to them during the mid-year breaks, and several of his summer breaks, while starting at Privet Drive, ended at the Burrow (or, in one case, Diagon Alley). So the Dursleys' exposure to the Harry-Hocrcux decreased, whereas Ron's (and others') increased. Yet the horcrux didn't affect them: we *know* what Ron's behaviour under such influence was like, and it only happened when he was exposed to the locket in Book 7
Another problem is that the dursleys didn’t hate just Harry, they were rude to Arthur,lily and James etc . None of them were horcruxes.
I guess the only explanation that would make sense would be if the horcrux feeds on feelings that are already present
‘When Voldemort made Harry into a Horcrux in Godric's Hollow, he didn’t perform any rituals either’ - how do you know? He did plan to murder two current and one future rival according to the prophecy. It’s absolutely plausible he came prepared.
What is not plausible that every death by magic creates a Horcrux. That would be quite a mess.
The snake in the terrarium was way too small to be a maladictus. Even as a young adult, Nagini would have been a normal size human, but at that weight would have been a huge snake. Harry’s interaction with the zoo snake only foreshadowed his capacity for parseltongue. Something that would come into play in Harry’s second year.
If Harry and Hermione were siblings Harry could have lived at the Granger home instead of the Dursleys and still been protected by his mother's protection magic. He would have been an entirely different character.
In regards to Marry Poppins being at Hogwarts is a quite convincing theory, I like it. It makes sense.
As for Hermione and Harry being siblings, I would so get behind it. But it's so not possible. Hermione is a few months older than Harry so it's just not possible, but their relationship does seem to be that of brother and sister, ge even said so in DEATHKY HALLOWS to Ron when (he ) Ron came back, "I think of her as a sister, and I reckon she sees me the same way." Man, I wish they were siblings.
Regarding Harry and Hermione being siblings, I don't think the birthdays would be a big issue, given that it is only a matter of record and they would already have required someone (probably just Harry's parents and Dumbledore) having to create a fake life for her already. They would almost certainly have to be fraternal twins, in which case it would not make sense to leave them with the same birthday, which would raise everyone's eyebrows.
If that theory were to be true, the goal would have had to have been to hide her for safety. It was publically known that the Potters had a child, so there was no point hiding both of them, but if even they were surprised by having twins, it might have made sense to hide one of them with a muggle family. Some minor memory and public records altering would be no trouble, so there would certainly be a name change and a different birthday and maybe even minor physical changes. Maybe they even intended to reclaim her after the war had they survived.
If Hermione and Harry were twins hidden at Birth in separate households she could simply be pretending to have a different birthday as part of the secret
@@StarShadowPrimal I love how you tied up the necessities of this theory. It ties up so well, it could fit. This could further explain why Crookshanks took so quickly to Hermione, he knew she is a Potter, and who was Crookshanks owned by? The Potters. So that now fully is how it ought to be. Thank you.
I think Ginny might have used a magic perfume to get Harry's attention but then had to use her own natural charm afterwards.
Harry and Hermione's birthdays are only ten months apart. Irish twins?
Here is my theory: Arthur Weasley is the brother of Endora and Clara, seen in Bewitched. Notice thar Endora has red hair and can appear and disappear by magic. Clara is very good at traveling by fireplace, and often drops down Samantha's fireplace to visit. She also loves mortals and is the only of Samantha's relatives to accept Darrin. Also, bith Endora and Clara admit that they grew up- and when to school- in England, Maurice has a heavy English accent, and wants to see hus grandchildren go to his old schools, which does include Hogwarts- Clara, Endora and Maurice are Hogwarts graduates!
❤ Love this ❤❤❤❤❤
I think Aunt Clara is Samantha's Great Aunt, not Aunt. Clearly of an older generation.
I think Clara is Maurice’s sister if I remember correctly
There is also the theory the the Dursley's were cruel to ultimately protect him
I think J.K rolling confirmed that one for petunia but nobody else
Understand my oddity in this, but I think that the Evans girls’ grandmother may have been sister to Hermione’s great-grandmother. That would have made them cousins. Too close for marriage, but close enough for family.
Draco might have heard of the basilisk in old legends, and put old “boogie-man tales” to keep kids in line with the symptoms of petrifaction. He then took down a text that described a basilisk, extracted the article, and left it in a history of Salazar Slytherin, looking for clues about “The Chamber of Secrets”. This would have led her to more information about the basilisk, including its adaptation to size and shape of occupied chambers. This was an attribute noted by Newt Scamander concerning certain magical creatures. Given those clues, she (rightly) concluded that the basilisk was traversing the (sewage) pipes.
@@Leon-w5h That first one would be easier to get behind- we don't know more than 1 generation back on those specific family lines, so who knows? After all, Hermione was going to have a younger sister maybe about Ginny's age (maybe younger) but JK ultimately decided not to have the younger sister in there of course. (I think it was found in her old notes) Maybe this would be a way of compensating, but who knows?
My theory:
Harry is a descendent of Godric Gryffindor.
@@Ryan_Dye-r The wizardly population was never very large, just about everyone could be descended from Gryffindor.
Mary poppins isn’t a witch, she’s a time lord. Her carpet bag is bigger on the inside, she has a sonic umbrella and can talk to animals. She’s a time lord.
I always wondered why they didn't find that paper in hermione's hand right away. When she was petrified.
I thought the professors would check to see if their were any clues.
Harry released a Boa constrictor -non poisonous, from zoo, as per the book. Nagini was poisonous.
Poking a hole in theory no.1,Dumbledore and Ron have different last names
The artwork in this video is so spine chillingly BEAUTIFUL
ALL OF IT
KUDUS to all the artists
Well worth preserving in a book on its own
I LOVE THE ARTWORK
Something I’ve noticed that I’ve never heard anyone else address in all these years is an inconsistency that has to do with nearly headless Nick. In book 1 during the welcoming feast Nick says to Harry when he watches Harry cut up his steak, “I haven’t eaten for nearly 400 years.” Notice how Nick say “nearly 40O” and not just 400. Now, fast forward to year and book 2 when Nearly headless Nick invites Harry, Ron, and Hermione to his death day party. Nick says it will be his 500 death day. How in one year did Nick go from nearly 400 years to exactly 500 years? If Nick had said he hadn’t eaten in 400 years instead of saying “nearly 400 years” one could possibly make the argument that ghost “age” ( is that the right word) differently than living beings. This is just a loop hole that I notice when rereading or re-listening to the Harry Potter books and to my knowledge no one talks about it nor do I think J.K Rowling has addressed the question on Potter more. Anyone who sees this and has either noticed this loop hole, or goes back to check on this after reading my comment tell me what you think about this.
At my age, I often get how many years it has been since something personal happened wrong. After a few hundred years Ned could have easily lost track.
@@Foolish188 I’ve never thought of that.👍
I thought it was well known that Mary Poppins was a timelord.
Even if dumbldore had a hourcrux, what you’re saying is he is still around and has found a way to survive without killing unicorns. On the the other hand we learned in fantastic beasts that he did have a deep drive for power though it may have been for the right reasons that can open up the opportunity to dive deeper into dark magic
1. Debunked (although it almost makes sense!) Besides, they're almost never in the conversation simultaneously.
2. Reasonable, but unknown as far as I know
3. Heard this one- others have pointed out this is just a "Luke and Leia" situation! But as far as I know, JK *was* planning on having Hermione have a sister who was also magical... until (I think) she realized how much it would slow things down. But why is Hermione wearing Hufflepuff robes at 5:20?
4. Makes sense- debunked, though
5. Heard this one...
6. Interesting! Don't know, though.
7. Never heard this whole theory, but why isn't the same true of Ron and Hermione in the rest of the *entire* series?!
8. Nagini's a human... so I don't think so. It must just foreshadow the Dueling Club scene and his Parseltongue ability.
Theory 7 doesn't hold water, before Harry was dropped at the Dursley's, there was a scene in the book following Vernon, who was already an intolerant boorish lout, it was therefore established behavior.
Marry Poppins' relationship with Hogwarts is just...WTF? Rowling wasn't even alive when Poppins first entered the scene, so how can they even be connected?
Video title says 7, while there are 8. Interesting. The 8th topic is very clearly debunked by not only the snake having a male voice actor, but by the fact that the snake itself points Harry's attention to the sign near him stating 'born and raised in captivity.'
I have heard another impossible theory, the Horntail harry faced in the tournament was Norbert, this can instantly be debunked, Norbert was a Norwegian Ridgeback, not a Horntail.
I couldn't stick behind that 1.That Miley, Granger and Harry are brother's sister.But that would mean that Perry and Mimi's mother and father is also his mother and father.I mean , her father and mother , you get what I mean
Nagini is female, while the python Harry released had a male voice.
Ron only had sandwiches on the train didn’t offer Harry sweets
In the movie yes but in the books he offered sweets
This comment made me laugh, I just randomly read it before even playing the video xD
@@sharimcfarland2102no Harry offered him sweets
A time turner doesn't deage the user, that's a whole in that theory.
Tldr at bottom
I have heard the theory that harry wasn't a true horcrux cuz horcrux are said to be inanimate objects. Meaning harry can't be a true horcrux. He is something similar to a Jinchuriki from Naruto though. I say this cuz horcrux have been know to take possession and even influence them yet the soul piece never showed sians of being able to do so. Then fact it is infact a fragment of tom riddle's soul is shown though the link tom uses to influence harry. All this can also support the ron being Dumbledore as well do to his lazy and greedy nature. Aka if ron and Dumbledore are one the same it just adds to the list of shady thing about Dumbledore. There is a long list of shady things about Dumbledore, and the rumor about Molly Weasley potioning Arthur has some evidence as well. Which is another shady thing to the list(her being one dumbledore's most fanatical followers). I can keep going on and on about all the shady things about dumbledore and some of the people closest to him, but i won't.
Tldr here: theory that harry is a false horcrux is both plausible, and adds to ron and dumbledore being one in the same. It also adds to theory of Dumbledore being a dark lord hiding in plain site.
PS:I personally think dumbledore is either a hidden Dark Lord or a complete moron that is just obscenely misguided (I lean to the former). I also don't believe the ron being Dumbledore. I just thought I'd point out though that the false horcrux theory is factor that adds to it. I also think harry is a false horcrux.
I must have taken 50 something screenshots 😂😂
I was thinking to add visuals to my harry Potter book collection
And then mKe my baby brother read
I think he will enjoy it more
This way
Big fly in the ointment on the Mary Poppins theory is that Harry Potter's world didn't even exist when Mary Poppins came out. Two separate worlds although.
3rd Theory, AKA the Star Wars theory 😁
People are putting to much thought into this. Why not just enjoy instead of seeing plots and plans everywhere!
Well said...sometimes there are some good theories but otherwise I just try to enjoy stuff rather to rationalize everything as if it was a massive puzzle to solve.
Sorry but ron is dumbledore makes little sense since we know how dumnbledor grew up, and that he had a brother and a sister. We actually meet the brother and see paintings of the sister, so they are nmot some made up legend to hide who he truly is. We know some things about his childhood even. I can see that making sense when the first few books came out, but not with what we know now.
But I really love the marry poppins one
Im wondering if the dursleys are effected by the horocrux. I mean Take Ron, neville, and the other boys in his room. They live also months with Harry in one small room. Seeing how fast Ron got effected during the last book, they also should have shown at least some little signs I think. But honestly still don't really know how human horocruxes work. Im always wondering about how its possible no one got effected by harry even tho they literally sleep less than 2 meters apart from each other for the bigger part of 6 YEARS. At the very least Ron and Neville should be effected because how much he hangs out with them
In case of the phoenix, wouldn't the fire destroy the horocrox? I know normal fire doesn't work, but I don't think the fire of a phoenix is normal fire. It seems magical just like the fire in the room of requierments.
The first chapter in the first book debunks the theory that the Durselys were affected by the Horcrux, it shows the Durselys before Harry is left on their doorstep, and they are just as awful as they are when Harry comes to live with them, nothing in their attitude changes.
What is the sorting hat? Gryffindor's hor crux? We can't see wear he hides his brain.
Spellchecker got me twice in that one. Horcrux and where lol
Hermione is Fox Mulder's sister. A time turner incident regressed her to child hood.
Ron transitioned into scully
the first thing tht came into my mind when i saw the front i was like ''BROTHER WHATTTT''
I had a theory like this once too. It went like this
Hermione was born in 1979, just a year before Harry.
What if James and lilly decided to send her away to be safe since she was born first they might thought she might've been the child in the prophecy. And Voldemort would've never thought that child in the prophecy would be muggle born.
She also seems to empressive with everything for being muggle born
Mary Poppins is so much more obviously a Time Lord!
Think, if she didn't ter the page it was Snape
Fan theories are almost always ridiculous, none more so than the ron dumbledore crap. I mean christ talk about building a house out of straw. These people have to much time on their hands
😂 I agree
that theory is ridiculous
Was thinking the same
That theory never made sense to me. People who believe that theory forget the fact Molly gave birth to Ron, he didn't just appear at the Burrow one day, and Molly and Arthur not realize they had an extra kid in the house, they didn't have that many kids lol
Hermione tore the book in case she was petrified. She knew she was in danger as a muggle-born and had the page as a backup.
And damaging a book isn't too bad when you know reparo
Everyone always tries to come up with these theories to ruin people’s childhood when really they’re just harmless fictional stories🤦🏽♂️🤷🏾♂️.
Marry Poppins was a pure blood she went to durmstrang
Can someone tell me why Dumbledore has 5 long fingers? Yes we all have 5 fingers on each hand but his is five longer fingers
Index maybe another one or it's two middle fingers or two ring fingers or two pinky fingers? If you don't know what I'm talking about look at the timestamp 17:25 and you will see what I'm talking about.
What is this new obsession with labeling Mary Poppins a witch? She is not a witch. Yet everyone calls her one and assumes she is, ignoring the movies and books.
She is not a witch
Who is the artist please?The paintings are stunning!
A granger is a term for a Western U. S. farmer. farmers plant seeds... so do potters.... hmmm
You massively botched that first theroy its not that dumbledore went back and became ron its that ron grew up then went back and became dumbledore, its implying dumbledore is part of a bootstrap paradox
Neither theory makes sense, as both of their families are quite well documented. As to Dumbledore becoming Ron, like this video says; a time-turner doesn't make you younger.
Fans can sometimes simply outwrite the author's. This is one of those occasions of tan's unbelievable minds. That being said, JK's entire story for Snape was on a different level, and no one on earth came all that was coming with that. There's probably 1 million+ "Always." tattoos on the ankles, backs, and wrists of girls (and I hate tattoos) but this is one I have seen a zillion times and not only accepts bit approve. It's one of the greatest examples of loves I have ever seen.
Married 16 years to the love of my life, now separated (but not divorced) for 10 months. I find myself thinking of what Snape said over and over in that scene. Sometimes, no matter what, even if she eventually gets with another man and has a family, my heart still says my love is "Always". Untouchable. I can't help it, no matter what.
To love someone you have lost and still, eternally love. I understand now, Snape. That takes the strongest man and love I have ever seen.
The only thing greater would be the love of the Lord himself. I still dream of her calling me and walking back through the door. She either will in this life or the next. I love you Veronica, my soulmate
All of these theories to me are conspiracy theories, with as little practical connective tissue as conspiracies. I couldn't stop laughing at all of them as I also laugh at conspiracy theories, or theories without any reliable scientific basis such as flat Earthers. I can see no way that these theories would stand up to real scrutiny and that the fans are the only people that hold them. The Mary Poppins (I will include Nanny McPhee in this) really had me rolling, yes I can see how she could have been schooled at Hogwarts but how did she escape without the Ministry getting involved, she would have been jailed in Azkaban for deliberately revealing magic to the muggle world on a repeated basis. Much as I enjoyed this video, as a fan of the series I cannot agree with any of the theories. Of course, that is only my personal opinion.
I love the idea of Harry and Hermione being brother and sister. 😍
And the Mary Poppins theory is simply adorable! 🩷
I also have a theory... Well, it's more of a simple headcanon, but here it goes: Remus Lupin never got intimate with anyone before Tonks, because of his furry little problem... And that was another strong motive for him to reject her and acting so off-charcter when it camed to her. After all, it was a very sensitive matter for him, who was in his mid-30s and had decides long ago that he would never get involved with anyone, because he was too dangerous.
What are these theories!!😭😭 and everything can’t just be connected with completely different things!!!!
I loved the movies and the books. With each book the style of the writing changed. Which I have my own theory on. I disagree that Draco was trying to help anyone. You’re giving his character too much credit for intelligence which he does not possess. He’s just a bully. The Dursley’s are like typical families today that have to take in a child they don’t want. They make the child’s livfe a living hell and torture them. We read many stories in the news like this. I’ve known a few myself. As far as a horcrux in Harry.. The Dursley’s had an agreement with Dumbledore to take him, hide him. So I’m sure there was a spell that was cast to protect them.
I think your artwork with your presentation was amazing. The pictures were absolutely beautiful.
Fans need to remember one thing it is just a book or a set of books. Sometimes we become so immersed in something because we find our own life unsatisfactory.
Though I do believe that there are some that can do real magic.
I like this theory about Harry and Hermione if it’s true.🧙♀️🛖⚡️🪦🪄🧹
No hermione isn't Harry's sister.
FACTS
Maybe 😎 chill
17:21 Who painted that. 🤨 I don't remember Dumbledore having that feature. 😳😂
He’s niceness
is the snake that he let out
Showing remorse can re-integrate a soul; Dumbledore often shows remorse over the death of his sister.
🤔 Malfoy 👍 All Along! 🪄
Nagini: Nope. The voice of the snake was male in the movie. Nagini in snake form was larger than the snake in the zoo.
I have a therory that harry became a horcrux is that Voldemort promised snape to spare Lilly hence him giving her a chance but when she died from his spell it created a horcrux and killed him her sacrifice and love for harry creating a protection for harry
That is Star Wars trope not Harry Potter
To me, I always thought, hermione granger and harry were meant to be to gether, but I see why it was Ginny instead. However, on a different note; I don't have a problem with the first fan theory.
HER NAME IS PRONOUNCED ROLLING. Not Rowwwwling.
Seems to many people have got too much time on their hands to waste dreaming up so many BS theories
Video proves it (not the narrator)
He tell us and we lie on the ground killing ourselves with laughter with the idiocy these people have of the Harry Potter world
The Phoenix theory is the only one that “might” hold water
The others, total BS
Anyone who has read the Mary Poppins books knows she’s obviously a slytherin. lol.
Though I find it interesting about Mary Poppins it has me thinking now since the bus used in Harry Potter movies is also seen in Halloween Town as well as the Grandma's bag also was deep as well. Though there was a certain time of year that she could visit her family in the human world the same bus was used with the same kind of bus stop as in Harry Potter stories. Although Grandma's bag walked would be that she enchanted the bag to follow her I would say she was in Gryffindor but I could be wrong but it does have me thinking of that.
Harry Potter as horcrux is true if you read the books or watch the films but to suggest that this is the reason that the dursley's were abusive too him is wrong and I should know as a person who was abused people who are abusers don't need a reason to abuse someone they do it for the sick gratification it gives them to see another person in pain simply because they enjoy seeing other people in pain making them feel like a waste of space . So stop making excuses for abusers it just enables them to do more harm !
I’ve always felt like Dumbledore had a slight favoring of Severus. But because of Lily he would never be able to be with Severus. So there then emerged an “enmity” that would never truly be understood until the events of The Half Blood Prince. This is when Albus administered his own death via the one he can never tell why.
Ron is not Dumbledore.
Dumbledore is Ron.
There is a big difference.
Ron Weasley was born as Ron Weasley.
After Voldemort won the Second Wizarding War and took control over all the Earth, Ron went back in time and aged himself down, then magicked the memories of the Dumbledore family in order to become one. He chose them because they were not a family of note.
Then, as a Dumbledore, he was able to guide Harry to victory.
That's also why Albus was so talented as a youth - he already had a lifetime of experience.
To Draco helping Harry along the way makes sense he could’ve sent the house elf dobby
Wow wow wow nooooo you did not just refer to a sherbet lemon as a " lemon drop " .... Tisk tisk tisk
The first four books of the Harry Potter series were translated into 'American' which meant if you had the American version it said lemon drop. It was so annoying that even as an American, I ended up buying the English versions of the books.
@@missanne2908 I think there were changes in all the books, though I may be mistaken. The first book was certainly the most changed, even the title. I also have the British version of the books.
It's kind of sad when people are insistent on a fan theory that even when the author herself debunks it, they cling to their theory.
who agrees that ron is not dumbledore if you agree let me knwo by commenting
I have never been able to read my sisters' minds.
Nagini is the snake he let out
Interesting theories of intriguing things, the one or half a dozen of the same things could exist in the shadows of Hogwarts Castle, and if this has been mentioned but H features a lot of the books of course Harry and Hemione having a similar name, Harry comes from Harold and Hermione is possible a Norse origin or German origins so this is odd they have H in their names where others in Harry Potter seem to use other letters in the alphabet but it's some hidden meaning in names that usually contain mysteries or family connections and false history. Potter has connections with rivers and clay and names exist because of trade or what people did. So maybe Hermione name has hidden meaning as does Harry's and most of the magical world of JKR. Guess the mystery will never be solved until he returns again the one who can be mentioned you see history can sometimes repeat itself especially while magic exists and something still lingers in Hogwarts that broken wand the power of magic is hard to break, and possibly ghosts still walk?
I thought harry was the head master, Hermonie the teacher that turns to a cat. Ron a teacher. Maybe there was one wizard clan before the 4 groups.
My theory- Beatrix potter is related to harry potter
How can Harry and Hermione be siblings they are in the same year! It’s only barely possible!
Twins
@@leonlipschitz3148they aren’t twins lol
Fraternal twins
Hermoine Granger became a witch but muggles can´t use magic so James and Lily Potter could be her biological parents.
Dumbldor died while fawkes was alive
herere is a teory that makes more sense regarding the Dursleys...they were clearly Narcissists - having lived around Narcissistic people for many years in my youth over those years I learned to recognise the characteristics of Narcissism...food for thought
Mary Poppins! went to Hogwarts.
😅 yeah he’s right
Maybe Rowling got these ideas From Mary Poppins.
Dobby could have told Draco
Yes, but if their behavior was the result of the horcrux then all the people around Harry in Hogwarts would have been mean to him too.
Hogwash... no way is Harry Hermione's brother that is total nonsense... I also find it extremely harfd to believe that ron weasley & professor Dumbledore are the same person..that in it'self is a total impssibility considering that both Ron & Dumbledore were seen together many times during the frianchise...
Is Alex jones behind these ? 😂😂😂
Yeah phoenixes might be immortal, but their boddies get destroyed after all as they burn to nothin but ashes.
Not sure a potential horcrux could survive this process 🤔..
Honestly I kinda like the theory of Harry and Hermoine being siblings. I could see Lily and James Potter separating the twins to make it harder for Voldemort to find and kill both of them, and turned their daughter over to the Grangers who were old family friends, since Voldemort wouldn't think to look too closely at muggles.
Too much Star Wars😅
@@hackman669exactly!
They’re not the same age though. Hermione is almost a whole year older.