The contractor clearly knows what he's talking about and doing, but his quality of work, based on the photos isn't all that great. But, I'm sure the plaintiff got what he paid for.
The contractor left a concave in the roof and explained it by saying that roofs don't necessarily have to be flat. And you all think that this equates to knowledge? I'm sure you don't understand what the word flat actually means....
I believe he did a subpar job, but yeah, the plaintiff didn't do everything correctly for his proof. He should have paid at least 2 companies to actually come over to give a real estimate. Many roofers will give free estimates, but if he had to pay, just add those fees to the suit.
So the issue is that a home inspector will find things wrong in order to get the seller to bring the price down. I’ve seen a video of a insurance inspector telling roofers they are doing the job wrong and they kept asking him how am I supposed to do it then and his reply every time is I don’t know I’m not a roofer…. Lol he was just looking to deny the insurance claim.
this is why i never became a licensed contractor . its better to be hired by a homeowner to do work as a non licensed person hired to do a specific job for the homeowner . this way your work is not warrantied automatically by law just because u are licensed .
For a person who is as seasoned as the plaintiff is, taking the word of a contractor is childish! I have all my dealings with contractors in writing and I don't pay the full amount for all the work that is completed.
While this is true, it doesn’t absolve the defendant of having done a shoddy job. But yes, just because someone is a good friend/neighbor doesn’t make them a good business person, so the familiarity shouldn’t come into play when doing business.
@@NubianP6 but the defendant did not do a shoddy job . the inspector did not know what he was talking about because he is not a roofing contractor and for all we know the inspector may have simply disliked the plaintiff and wanted to make his life harder .
and he probably knew this because he himself was also a general contractor , so i think he was just trying to get a pay day and all he got was 500 and even that was not deserved .
the plaintiff's answer to doug's question says it all , his answer was that he was gonna leave the roof as is with no further repairs . that means he is admitting the work was done well enough to not need any further repairs . he should have never got that 500 .
@EmoNinjaKat89 Yes and no, there are things that are just aesthetic vs things that are a legit safety/insurance issue. My sister bought a house and had to battle with the insurance company to get it insured over a type of roof shingle. Since it was a family sale she got a good price on the house, otherwise if it was sold to a private buyer they would ask for all the shingles to be replaced since they were not up to insurable standard despite being physically sound.
I watch it for the PEOPLE, not the "judge". The "judge" is not the only person on this show. Why does anyone have to like Milian to watch? That makes zero sense.
HOPEFULLY. The contractor himself stated that there's nothing wrong "YET." As a contractor that seems quite certain that something will leak eventually, why not just take care of it now? If he waits and the leak(s) causes more damage not only to the outside but also the interior of the home, it's certainly going to end up costing him more than if he had just corrected the faulty workmanship now. Also, if the planttiff is trying to sell the property and can't because the roof doesn't pass inspection, then there is obviously something wrong with it. The planttiff should make sure that the 10 year warranty is transferable to the new owners and have it in writing. A new roof is a huge selling point, especially if it's done properly and comes with a warranty. The seller needs to be certain to leave the original receipt with the warranty details either in the house or bring it to the closing so that the new owner has proof of warranty. The seller also needs to keep a copy of the contract for his records. I had a pitched, large duplex roof and a flat hot tar roof replaced on my home in Wisconsin during a terrible winter storm and extremely cold weather. They removed 2 layers of asphalt shingles, a layer cedar shakes, and nearly every piece of plywood sheeting, drip edge, and trim. Removed all the garage trim, drip edge, loose rubber, and a few pieces of plywood sheeting on the garage. I worried about whether the rubber would adhere and if the shingles would ashere to each other properly, and it turns out that everything not only adhered properly, but it also looked beautiful. I sold the home 6 months later, and when the purchaser had their inspection done, I was there, and the inspector asked me when I had the roof done, and by whom. He told the buyers that he had never seen such a quality roof job in his 26 years of doing inspections. I had rain gutters done the week after the roof, and he said the same thing about them. It's been 17 years since I had the work done, and it still looks just as beautiful, and the garage roof doesn't have one leak in it. The property is for sale again so I was able to see the home again and talk to the owners. Personally I thought the guys were crazy to be on my ice, and snow covered roof in January when I came home and seen them, but hey it's Wisconsin, we keep working through it all, lol. I left all the warranty paperwork on the kitchen counter for numerous items, and the buyers were very thankful. Just an FYI, if anyone is considering selling their home, it helps the value more than you might think.
I agree 100%. I would also say that you can't go by the inspector. I had inspector and he didn't catch so much stuff when I got my home it wasn't even funny. After that I have talk to a few inspectors and found a lot don't know what they are doing. It's sad but true. Also I don't care if it's ten dollars but if he don't pay in full don't call and think you will get warranty.
I always get work done by word of mouth from someone I trust. I've had so much horrible service over the years by people that I didn't get a recommendation first.
he claims some of the plywood is rotted but either he just wanted free wood replacement or the plywood may have started rotting AFTER the roofing job was already done .
All of the pictures the plaintiff showed the Judge he said, you see here, and then he says, you can see that better on another picture. Yet, he doesn't show that better picture. So what is the point?
The defendant certainly knew what he was talking about, he came across as very professional, I just hope the workers he contracted to do the job are as professional, or perhaps they cheaped out on certain things, which is possible, they keep the stuff they didn't put up and then use that on another under the table job, without the defendant knowing...
Please bring back the post case examination discussion with JM and her husband John. I meet someone who golfs with John and they spoke so highly about how nice and sweet he was and how JM loves wine 😂 which shows they’re both so genuine and authentic on tv and off ❤
I don't agree with this one! The warranty was for leaks. There is no proof of leaks. Cosmetic issues should have been addressed at the end of the work not a year later. Inspectors normally don't know more than what the book says. Also the $60 may seem small but it's part of the contract. What if the contractor did all but the last one percent of the work. That would be a big deal. Seems like the guy got a $560 discount for annoying everyone.
Plaintiff was ripped off, should have got the $60 he was owed. Can't believe she made him pay $500 when there are no issues. Of course inspectors will find something. That's like taking your car to the dealer and they look over it and say it doesn't need anything. Never going to happen.
I have a similar personality as the defendant. I speak slowly, and use a lot of educated words- but SOMETIMES idk what I’m talking about 😩😩. He did drop the ball and should’ve fixed the errors.
Problem is sometimes with roofs it’s not always going to look pretty other companies will say it’s bad n if u get another company they will do the same I think this roofer knows his stuff
I love all the professionals in the comment section. 80% of these people couldn't change a toilet flapper but yet have sound insight into how the roof "shoulda been". Sounds about right.
I'm sorry but if you don't completely pay someone for their work, yes whatever warranty you were going to get should be voided. You get a warranty with payment in full. If you don't completely pay, you don't get any kind of guarantee for anything.
The plaintiff didn’t pay him the last $60 but talking like he was so honest and upstanding. The defendant should have sued him for the last $60. And then he got greedy and sued for pain and suffering. Wow
Who said JM is racist, dang. The $500 was to make the plaintiff happy, there’s nothing wrong with the roof and the defendant is correct. As a former contractor the defendant is very knowledgeable as far as roofing goes.
I had a home inspector come to my house when I switched home owner's insurance companies. The guy was a joke. He didn't really inspect anything, he just walked around taking pictures (inside & outside). My house is spread out, so I have three A/C units that are up in two separate attics, but the guy didn't want to bother climbing up the ladder to look at them. He just took my word for it that everything was good up there. When I got the report back a few days later, and the only issue they had was (in one of the photos taken at a bad angle) it looked like a branch from an oak tree was extended over the top of my roof, and they wanted me to have it trimmed back. Well, it wasn't. I just climbed up a ladder and took a better picture to clearly show that it wasn't... and they were good with it. The inspector was a moron.
The defendant was spot on did a wonderful job. Where he screwed up is he agreed to still honor the warranty. If some ass clown tries to go Fix something that I did right your warranty does not exist anymore
Look at this. A roofing contractor that stood in court and claimed that a roof should not be flat. And the best part is the suckers in this comment thread the agree with him. That is the answer to the question, how do people make a living doing something that they don't know how to do?
Yeah she got this wrong I’m sorry the contractor was right in everything - and I’ve had inspectors lie on paper just to get us out of the house contract to get deposit back
What about the inspection? That did indicate what was done incorrectly and what was needed to be fixed. He did not pass if the repair says that it’s correct. She would have taken it with a car estimate. It’s not broke or leaking but can’t pass the inspection 🤷🏾♀️. He should have gotten at least $1,000.
Youre confusing the inspection done by the city with the inspection done by the home buyer. There is no "pass" by the home inspector, they just document what they see so the potiental buyer knows everything. The only "pass" comes from the city to ensure that the repairs are up to code, something that the defendant says passed meaning everything is up to code and done properly.
The attitude from both parties here was infuriating. The plaintiff quipped: "can I talk now?". The mansplaining defendant didnt shine either as he was disrepectfully leaning on the judges bench, interrupting and incorrectly finishing the judges' sentences. I immediately tune out ignorant twits that start with: "Now here's the thing...". Interesting case of rough justice here. The paintiff would've prevailed with a receipt and doesn't deserve emotional damages. I bet the defendant is going to regret working on that roof as it looks like a roof with old parts and lots of problems. He'll be back up there doing repairs soon enough I'm sure. Great show today, I love this channel and its participants. Thank you for cutting out the "coming up" section. I hate spoilers. xP
The guy should've came back and checked his work. But the plaintiff lucky he got anything because he didn't have no estimates tor replacing the board and he said he didn't see any leaks so 🤷♀️
I hate how cheap the judge always is! She always gives the least amount possible or tries to over talk people so they can’t finish what they’re saying bc then she might have to give more money! It comes out of her pocket and her shows budget otherwise I guarantee if she wasn’t paying the judgement she would award people a lot more money!
$500 judgment was a Slap in the face! This was a bad ruling in my opinion. The plentiful should have got a bigger portion of his money back. The judge seems like she favored the defendant for whatever reasons 🤔🤔🤔 & she was kinda being rude to the plaintiff! Hated ittt
He didn’t do a tradesman quality job proven by inspection. The plaintiff lost a sale for his property because of it. I would be angry to after paying 6k.
the plaintiff's answer to doug's question says it all , his answer was that he was gonna leave the roof as is with no further repairs . that means he is admitting the work was done well enough to not need any further repairs . he should have never got that 500 .
havent u been reading any of the other comments ? about how inspectors are NOT tradesmen and they dont know what they are talking about most of the time ?
@@marleonetti7 why would I read other comments to determine what to say? I know two building inspectors who are employed by the govt. one in fact was my best man at my wedding many years ago. Every house or building in his city must be passed by him to meet council guidelines. Hes only been a builder all his life and wouldn’t have got the job had he not.
wrong , he was making a point about the plaintiff's character and dishonesty and it was not about the amount . this judge was out of her mind giving that plaintiff any money at all .
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I love the defendant’s voice. He could narrate audiobooks!
Agree
Yes!!!!!!
Esp compared to plaintiffs haha
@@joedavidzuniga1993😊
Yes! I thought the same thing!
Complaining after a year is not too long. You've gone through all seasons within a year. That's a test of the weather and some time.
and no leak , so his work was proven to be good .
For the first time I trust the contractor. The gentlemen seemed so knowledgeable. I trust him.
me too , that plaintiff was just trying to get a huge discount on the work . the judge should not have even given him the 500 .
Same. Plus the plaintiffs own admission there has been no leak issues to date
The contractor clearly knows what he's talking about and doing, but his quality of work, based on the photos isn't all that great. But, I'm sure the plaintiff got what he paid for.
The contractor left a concave in the roof and explained it by saying that roofs don't necessarily have to be flat. And you all think that this equates to knowledge? I'm sure you don't understand what the word flat actually means....
I believe he did a subpar job, but yeah, the plaintiff didn't do everything correctly for his proof. He should have paid at least 2 companies to actually come over to give a real estimate. Many roofers will give free estimates, but if he had to pay, just add those fees to the suit.
This defendant has a great voice. He should get a voice-over agent.
Defendant is a DILF!!! 🔥🔥🔥
I know about roofing, the roofer was correct but unfortunately was in a position where it was difficult for him to prevail.
So the issue is that a home inspector will find things wrong in order to get the seller to bring the price down. I’ve seen a video of a insurance inspector telling roofers they are doing the job wrong and they kept asking him how am I supposed to do it then and his reply every time is I don’t know I’m not a roofer…. Lol he was just looking to deny the insurance claim.
John has a voice for radio!
I have never met a home inspector who knew what they were talking about. Never put your faith in their reports.
this is why i never became a licensed contractor . its better to be hired by a homeowner to do work as a non licensed person hired to do a specific job for the homeowner . this way your work is not warrantied automatically by law just because u are licensed .
Plaintiff lost me at the dog slapping stage.
Seriously! I wonder how he raised his kids
He was speaking figuratively. Get a grip.
For a person who is as seasoned as the plaintiff is, taking the word of a contractor is childish! I have all my dealings with contractors in writing and I don't pay the full amount for all the work that is completed.
Taking his word?? HOW ABOUT THR 5 GRAND PAID HIM YOU IDIOT!!!!! YEAH ID EXPECT NO PROBLEMS
While this is true, it doesn’t absolve the defendant of having done a shoddy job. But yes, just because someone is a good friend/neighbor doesn’t make them a good business person, so the familiarity shouldn’t come into play when doing business.
@@NubianP6 but the defendant did not do a shoddy job . the inspector did not know what he was talking about because he is not a roofing contractor and for all we know the inspector may have simply disliked the plaintiff and wanted to make his life harder .
You stiff the contractors and don’t pay them for the completed work!? That’s terrible! Shame on you
The roof is bowed because the rafters are bowed. You have to tear off all sheating and change rafters. He wasn't ready to pay for all that.
and he probably knew this because he himself was also a general contractor , so i think he was just trying to get a pay day and all he got was 500 and even that was not deserved .
I don’t like how the judge is yelling at that plaintiff like girl
She does this to who she thinks is vulnerable and black.
Defendant has big time John Malkovich vibes
the plaintiff's answer to doug's question says it all , his answer was that he was gonna leave the roof as is with no further repairs . that means he is admitting the work was done well enough to not need any further repairs . he should have never got that 500 .
I could listen to the Defendent all day long.
A Buyers inspector will always find "things wrong" so they can get money off if they guy the house, when theres nothing wrong physically.
@EmoNinjaKat89 Yes and no, there are things that are just aesthetic vs things that are a legit safety/insurance issue. My sister bought a house and had to battle with the insurance company to get it insured over a type of roof shingle. Since it was a family sale she got a good price on the house, otherwise if it was sold to a private buyer they would ask for all the shingles to be replaced since they were not up to insurable standard despite being physically sound.
He should've gotten his money back all of it.💯
Idk why people watch shows just to talk negative about the judge. Go watch something else.
Adrian is famous at this, very racist and thinks everyone else is
He is famous for having 2 account and complaining all the time.
Women everything even under judge mathis he is there crying
I watch it for the PEOPLE, not the "judge". The "judge" is not the only person on this show. Why does anyone have to like Milian to watch? That makes zero sense.
EVERYONE HAS THEIR OWN OPINION JUST LIKE FOLKS SUCH AS YOURSELF COMES OFF AS A ASSSSS KISSER.
some people just love to complain
Defendant knows his work
As a former contractor, the defendant is right and seems very knowledgeable. Hopefully it never leaks.
Contracters is NOT SENT FROM.GOD. many many get PAID N RUN
HOPEFULLY???!!! I'm an Adjuster and HOPEFULLY IS NOT A GOOD WORD!! NEED A WARRANTY!!
Thanks that you're a former contractor if you think the defendant did good work.. 😅
HOPEFULLY. The contractor himself stated that there's nothing wrong "YET." As a contractor that seems quite certain that something will leak eventually, why not just take care of it now? If he waits and the leak(s) causes more damage not only to the outside but also the interior of the home, it's certainly going to end up costing him more than if he had just corrected the faulty workmanship now. Also, if the planttiff is trying to sell the property and can't because the roof doesn't pass inspection, then there is obviously something wrong with it. The planttiff should make sure that the 10 year warranty is transferable to the new owners and have it in writing. A new roof is a huge selling point, especially if it's done properly and comes with a warranty. The seller needs to be certain to leave the original receipt with the warranty details either in the house or bring it to the closing so that the new owner has proof of warranty. The seller also needs to keep a copy of the contract for his records.
I had a pitched, large duplex roof and a flat hot tar roof replaced on my home in Wisconsin during a terrible winter storm and extremely cold weather. They removed 2 layers of asphalt shingles, a layer cedar shakes, and nearly every piece of plywood sheeting, drip edge, and trim. Removed all the garage trim, drip edge, loose rubber, and a few pieces of plywood sheeting on the garage. I worried about whether the rubber would adhere and if the shingles would ashere to each other properly, and it turns out that everything not only adhered properly, but it also looked beautiful. I sold the home 6 months later, and when the purchaser had their inspection done, I was there, and the inspector asked me when I had the roof done, and by whom. He told the buyers that he had never seen such a quality roof job in his 26 years of doing inspections. I had rain gutters done the week after the roof, and he said the same thing about them. It's been 17 years since I had the work done, and it still looks just as beautiful, and the garage roof doesn't have one leak in it. The property is for sale again so I was able to see the home again and talk to the owners.
Personally I thought the guys were crazy to be on my ice, and snow covered roof in January when I came home and seen them, but hey it's Wisconsin, we keep working through it all, lol.
I left all the warranty paperwork on the kitchen counter for numerous items, and the buyers were very thankful. Just an FYI, if anyone is considering selling their home, it helps the value more than you might think.
I agree 100%. I would also say that you can't go by the inspector. I had inspector and he didn't catch so much stuff when I got my home it wasn't even funny. After that I have talk to a few inspectors and found a lot don't know what they are doing. It's sad but true. Also I don't care if it's ten dollars but if he don't pay in full don't call and think you will get warranty.
I think as a judge you inevitably gain knowledge about so many different jobs and areas of life lol just cause of the cases you deal with in your life
You may be the first ever to post an intelligent comment on TH-cam
Her dad was a contractor she knows all about that.
Yes. And in this case she's already a step ahead of the average person because she comes from a family of contractors.
Very surface level knowledge though
@14:50 (Defendant to Plaintiff) THAT is the definitive look of “FAFO” 😂
$500 is ridiculous
Yup. It should have been 0.
@@DonziGT230 It should have been all!
Pain and suffering 😂😂😂
I always get work done by word of mouth from someone I trust.
I've had so much horrible service over the years by people that I didn't get a recommendation first.
Sir you installed that incorrectly just accept it even the patch up was bad smh how can it be sealed?! He don't know what he doing, bad roofer 🙅🏽♀️
The pipes have no left phalanges!!
I would have dropped the gavel on my foot if that defendant walked toward me with those eyes and that voice, lol. 😂
He said don’t shaft me 😂
i love this show!!!
The new show lacks the reality that this show has.
I like the defendant’s explanation of his work
Cancel new is acting sad
I don't like her new show. So different from this one.
Plaintiff is so wrong
That counterflashing should have been folded into a groove on the chimney and then sealed.
he claims some of the plywood is rotted but either he just wanted free wood replacement or the plywood may have started rotting AFTER the roofing job was already done .
Disturbing that the plaintiff said women “won’t give you no respect until you slap em”
6:00 Why did JM say Chim-Ah-Ney? 😳🥴
JM forgot to deduct the $60 that was owed to the roofer
All of the pictures the plaintiff showed the Judge he said, you see here, and then he says, you can see that better on another picture. Yet, he doesn't show that better picture. So what is the point?
To anyone getting their roof done, question everything and have someone else check their work.
Judge milian played in the plaintiff’s face with that $500, even doug said “good for you”.
Come on, Doug is a professional shit stirrer
The defendant certainly knew what he was talking about, he came across as very professional, I just hope the workers he contracted to do the job are as professional, or perhaps they cheaped out on certain things, which is possible, they keep the stuff they didn't put up and then use that on another under the table job, without the defendant knowing...
At 63 I'm still learning the law. Sitting here smoking a blunt 🤫
WOW. I’m glad I’m not you.
that man knows he's not a former contractor. people stop lying
Pain and suffering on a roof contracts case, really??
Please bring back the post case examination discussion with JM and her husband John. I meet someone who golfs with John and they spoke so highly about how nice and sweet he was and how JM loves wine 😂 which shows they’re both so genuine and authentic on tv and off ❤
You know the show is over Right?
I don't agree with this one! The warranty was for leaks. There is no proof of leaks. Cosmetic issues should have been addressed at the end of the work not a year later. Inspectors normally don't know more than what the book says. Also the $60 may seem small but it's part of the contract. What if the contractor did all but the last one percent of the work. That would be a big deal. Seems like the guy got a $560 discount for annoying everyone.
Why is our girl throwing a third syllable in 'chimney'? 🙃
Any company just like a car company will tell you it is a bad job they want the work.
Didn’t know Triple H was doing roofing
The contractor did a pisspoor job, & didn’t stand on his warranty. I wouldn’t hire him.
This Judge is much more respectful than Judge Judy who is constantly belittling litigants….plus JM is much prettier!
Those other roofers he was going to hire was going to get up there and not do a damn thing and charge him an arm and leg but leave it the same.
The People's Court
Plaintiff was ripped off, should have got the $60 he was owed. Can't believe she made him pay $500 when there are no issues. Of course inspectors will find something. That's like taking your car to the dealer and they look over it and say it doesn't need anything. Never going to happen.
I have a similar personality as the defendant. I speak slowly, and use a lot of educated words- but SOMETIMES idk what I’m talking about 😩😩. He did drop the ball and should’ve fixed the errors.
Problem is sometimes with roofs it’s not always going to look pretty other companies will say it’s bad n if u get another company they will do the same I think this roofer knows his stuff
I love all the professionals in the comment section. 80% of these people couldn't change a toilet flapper but yet have sound insight into how the roof "shoulda been". Sounds about right.
I love how the bailiff stay ready! Anyone getting close to her male or female be intense lol😅
I like the plaintiff
too bad he is a con trying to use the court to get a undeserved pay day .
I gurantee that when these issues come up at the judges home, she is made whole and not half.
At least he knows not to trust this guy again or offer him anymore work.
@14:15The moment the defendant knew he lost the case… J👩🏻⚖️DGE MM: “did the roof leak??”
plaintiff*
You definitely don't own a house if you think a year is too long
I'm sorry but if you don't completely pay someone for their work, yes whatever warranty you were going to get should be voided. You get a warranty with payment in full. If you don't completely pay, you don't get any kind of guarantee for anything.
The plaintiff didn’t pay him the last $60 but talking like he was so honest and upstanding. The defendant should have sued him for the last $60. And then he got greedy and sued for pain and suffering. Wow
$500 for roof repairs wow!!! Lol thats laughable. I understand what she meant far as the future leaks. Lastly, I don't believe JM is racist.
Who said JM is racist, dang. The $500 was to make the plaintiff happy, there’s nothing wrong with the roof and the defendant is correct. As a former contractor the defendant is very knowledgeable as far as roofing goes.
@@Wolfnap313a chronic commenter always makes a post about how she is racist, just read the other comments, you’ll find it.
If they were from Cuba Ohhhhh shes give em $2500
Home Inspectors are cheap and only require a basic certification. Its the buyers home Inspector... they will always find problems.
I had a home inspector come to my house when I switched home owner's insurance companies. The guy was a joke. He didn't really inspect anything, he just walked around taking pictures (inside & outside). My house is spread out, so I have three A/C units that are up in two separate attics, but the guy didn't want to bother climbing up the ladder to look at them. He just took my word for it that everything was good up there. When I got the report back a few days later, and the only issue they had was (in one of the photos taken at a bad angle) it looked like a branch from an oak tree was extended over the top of my roof, and they wanted me to have it trimmed back. Well, it wasn't. I just climbed up a ladder and took a better picture to clearly show that it wasn't... and they were good with it. The inspector was a moron.
Omg abusive much.. you slap her to teach her to respect you just like you would a dog .wtfff😮
Yo JM do you know Pat?😂
Nice to see how quickly the plaintiff jumps to threats.
And pretty sure the plaintiff would get knocked out.
Nah, his family is right there!!!! U know you clear people are pussy
The defendant was spot on did a wonderful job. Where he screwed up is he agreed to still honor the warranty. If some ass clown tries to go
Fix something that I did right your warranty does not exist anymore
Look at this. A roofing contractor that stood in court and claimed that a roof should not be flat. And the best part is the suckers in this comment thread the agree with him. That is the answer to the question, how do people make a living doing something that they don't know how to do?
1:00 everyone lifts their hand at the same time. It's strange
Good catch!
This cat is the last of the Mohicans…. In other words last of the White Skin rooofers!!!
Sky lights always leak everyone knows that this guy doesn't have a case
Samuel L. Jackson vs. Paul Bunyan
The way JM says chimney 😊 She says chim-in-ney😂. Cute.
Yeah she got this wrong I’m sorry the contractor was right in everything - and I’ve had inspectors lie on paper just to get us out of the house contract to get deposit back
Timberline is a G.A.F brand,15 20 year dura😊
What about the inspection? That did indicate what was done incorrectly and what was needed to be fixed. He did not pass if the repair says that it’s correct. She would have taken it with a car estimate. It’s not broke or leaking but can’t pass the inspection 🤷🏾♀️. He should have gotten at least $1,000.
Youre confusing the inspection done by the city with the inspection done by the home buyer. There is no "pass" by the home inspector, they just document what they see so the potiental buyer knows everything. The only "pass" comes from the city to ensure that the repairs are up to code, something that the defendant says passed meaning everything is up to code and done properly.
Thanks for clarifying!
I agree I felt like she was on the defendants side from the get go
She's preferential
The attitude from both parties here was infuriating. The plaintiff quipped: "can I talk now?". The mansplaining defendant didnt shine either as he was disrepectfully leaning on the judges bench, interrupting and incorrectly finishing the judges' sentences. I immediately tune out ignorant twits that start with: "Now here's the thing...".
Interesting case of rough justice here. The paintiff would've prevailed with a receipt and doesn't deserve emotional damages.
I bet the defendant is going to regret working on that roof as it looks like a roof with old parts and lots of problems. He'll be back up there doing repairs soon enough I'm sure.
Great show today, I love this channel and its participants. Thank you for cutting out the "coming up" section. I hate spoilers. xP
How was he "Mansplaining"?
Are men not allowed to explain anything, anymore?
The guy should've came back and checked his work. But the plaintiff lucky he got anything because he didn't have no estimates tor replacing the board and he said he didn't see any leaks so 🤷♀️
I hate how cheap the judge always is! She always gives the least amount possible or tries to over talk people so they can’t finish what they’re saying bc then she might have to give more money! It comes out of her pocket and her shows budget otherwise I guarantee if she wasn’t paying the judgement she would award people a lot more money!
Judge Mathis is better than this Judge or Judge Judy
$500 judgment was a Slap in the face! This was a bad ruling in my opinion. The plentiful should have got a bigger portion of his money back. The judge seems like she favored the defendant for whatever reasons 🤔🤔🤔 & she was kinda being rude to the plaintiff! Hated ittt
He didn’t do a tradesman quality job proven by inspection. The plaintiff lost a sale for his property because of it. I would be angry to after paying 6k.
the plaintiff's answer to doug's question says it all , his answer was that he was gonna leave the roof as is with no further repairs . that means he is admitting the work was done well enough to not need any further repairs . he should have never got that 500 .
havent u been reading any of the other comments ? about how inspectors are NOT tradesmen and they dont know what they are talking about most of the time ?
@@marleonetti7 why would I read other comments to determine what to say? I know two building inspectors who are employed by the govt. one in fact was my best man at my wedding many years ago. Every house or building in his city must be passed by him to meet council guidelines. Hes only been a builder all his life and wouldn’t have got the job had he not.
Just because he's been roofing since he was 18. Doesn't automatically mean he was doing it right !!
I DONT LIKE HER!!
Nobody does that's why she was canceled
defendant is %100 correct.
The defendant was very knowledgeable and seemed trustworthy.
I dont know about trustworthy, he wouldn't answer his neighbor because of a petty $60. But I do agree that he knows what he's talking about.
😅😅😅
Another plaintiff that lost due to being black. Hate to say it but JM maybe racist.
Dude you said nothing different. Plaintiff is an idiot, and should get no money, the judge is being an idiot imo.
The defendant, the roofer, was a jerk over $60. The final comment from the roofer was beyond ignorant. 🤦🏽♀️
wrong , he was making a point about the plaintiff's character and dishonesty and it was not about the amount . this judge was out of her mind giving that plaintiff any money at all .
Horrible roofing job.. Bootleg roof installed.. shade tree mechanic work and unprofessional
The plaintiff has an answer for everything he did wrong
The defendant. He’s the contractor who did the work.
Defendant is a smooth liar
Sounded like he was mansplaining the work they were doing to the judge.