Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk | Vin Diesel's Sacrifice | 4K HDR HFR (60FPS) | 5.1 Surround
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ส.ค. 2019
- Click here to watch how we convert to 60fps using AI: • Use AI to make 60fps a... I DO NOT OWN THIS CLIP
All rights owned by Sony Pictures Entertainment
/ sonypictures - บันเทิง
This channel has copyright strike, immediately subscribe backup channel: th-cam.com/channels/c_lxgyKjvxO-lHHa03pUhw.html
Thats sad
Will you Please put more new clips of transformers and fast and furious please?🥺
Those are the cleanest uniforms I've ever seen.
The cleanest resolution I’ve ever seen
@@jamarbrown8924 this looks just as good as the live video from the war,. very realistic
Wardrobe department usually gets this one wrong; brand spanking new and no thought that they need to look worn and dusted up. The best looking uniforms you see is in Generation Kill, where the department was given strict instructions not to wash the uniforms at all, so that the actors wearing them would naturally be dusting up, sweating and wearing them out progressively through the duration of filming.
It’s an Oxy Power bro lol.
When Vin starts talking right to the camera, it feels like a 90’s fmv cd rom game with better video quality.
Yeah they cannot convey any intimacy with hfr lmao
This is Y😧
I wouldn't say this is the best shot movie ever, but it's an amazing case study of how 24fps suspends audience disbelief, hides imperfections, makes special effects look WAY better, and uses our brains to fill in the gaps.
Here at 60fps it fails to be what our minds expect as "a movie" and starts being treated closer to real life, thus any and every flaw stands out.
Exactly. 60fps makes films so damn fake lol
couldn't agree more
Really hope 60fps does not become the standard
🎯 TH-camr GATURKS says: 🤔 I actually love the way it looks guys! I think high fps takes everything to the next level. Next to real life.
@Fabian Mayer Yesssss! Gemini Man was stunning!!!!
This is freaky sharp and clear on my Samsung. Its eerie how crisp this is
Isn't it? HFR reduces motion blur and makes it look even more crisper. By the way, is your smart TV connected to a home theatre? Because I uploaded it with 5.1 audio and I need feedback if viewers are getting surround sound or not. (Yes, this is my channel).
I am watching this on my samsung too and it looks freaky. Seems like watching it in realtiy
Can't believe how much on my s20 ultra
@@ShreyTyagi Watched with a 5.1.2 (Atmos), I just have stereo. Because TH-cam only accept stereo ! Even this kind of "atmos" video of Dolby themself :
th-cam.com/video/91BUM3WhCfo/w-d-xo.html
It's higly ironic...
Samsung s10 , one of the best panels out there
This is what you call a live 4k amazing...
This looks so clean and real that it breaks the immersion, rather than feel that you're there in a battlefield, you feel that you are there on the film set reenacting a battlefield.
fake!!
Speak for yourself. This looks real to me, in 30 fps this just looks blurry and stuttery, making it seem less real to me.
@@ThornskadeIf you dont mind, could you state your age? 18- 18-30 30+ 65+?
@@NicksHeine I agree with Altefier. My age is 40 here. Never liked the motion blur in movies. I also hate overly done depth of field.
@@Sidowse This is exactly what I'm thinking. The bad acting is a lot easier to see at 48+fps as scenes aren't as blurry. I noticed the same while watching clips from Gemini Man.
Liked it? There's a whole playlist of clips from this movie here:
th-cam.com/video/7zCywLzJJs8/w-d-xo.html
Watching at 1440p60 and its Fucking satisfied my eyes..
When I watched this film in cinema at 120fps, that was an experience of a lifetime
How does it feel compared to watching it at 60fps in this video?
Is 120 fps very different from 60 fps?
Is 120 fps very different from 60 fps?
Is 120 fps very different from 60 fps?
Is 120 fps very different from 60 fps?
Vin Diesel, walking into killzones since Saving Private Ryan
Oh shit I literally did not think of that! And I just saw SPR not even a couple months ago. Nice observation.
cause family...
@@user-tb6gi7jt4d The meme is getting out of hand
He be back billy lynn 2 vietnam drift lol
@@user-tb6gi7jt4d he Says that for family lol
This feels less like a movie and more like I'm watching news footage.
Now that what i call HDR!💪
Full-screen 4K HDR 60fps with DTS-HD 5.1 sound! Wow!
How do you obtain 5.1 on youtube ? I have surround, it works perfectly with movies and games, but youtube is always stereo for me.
@@LePoudingue I'll soon make a tutorial about it and let you know.
@@ShreyTyagi Bullshit..
high fps is definitely more real, the problem here is this is a movie, which is fake from the first place. 60 fps shows all the imperfection of it. I would say 60fps should be much better to record real event, documentary or live news reports and games.
I was always curious to see this in its intended format. I wondered how practical effects would look. It looks neat, but it also takes away the cinematic feel. If you filmed this as a one shot sequence with unknown actors it would possibly have a better impact. But that's just my opinion.
60fps turn movies into soap operas and TV/Bluray demos at Best buy
@@lemons2300 The soap opera effect is from simulated high refresh. When the TV tries to guess the frames or inserts a black frame. Out of all the high FPS video I've watched, I feel you get over it looking "weird" after a few minutes. It's just because we're used to 24FPS movies. I saw The Hobbit in 48FPS and it looked amazing.
@@iSupermanCKi I was referring to it looking like a soap opera, not the soap opera effect
@@iSupermanCKi
A friend used to have a TV that defaulted to a higher refresh rate and I definitely never got used to it. It has always and will always look wrong
holy shit! this looked like "real" footage, it looks weird HFR since i am not used to it but i would love to see more content in this speed
الله اكبر
This wasn't the run of the mill HFR. This was double the frame rate of normal HFR. That ended up being why this and "Gemini Man" were such massive failures. Both movies had so much in common: both were directed by Ang Lee, both were presented in a format that only a handful of theatres could actually display correctly, and both had no business being shot in that format because it ended up being too much of a distraction.
That being said, I've no doubt it looked amazing in its native format, but it was the digital equivalent of shooting an entire feature film in 15/70 IMAX - a really bad, really wasteful idea.
Amazing quality.
Oh this is GOLD! 60 FPS is the real deal! it is as if you are really among the soldiers. i don't understand why people complain that their smartphones videos 60 FPS feature?
120 was what I expected tho :/
Still better than nothing
@@joeyakathug5215 , TH-cam has yet to support 120 FPS. The real problem is that people call High Frame rate soap opera
It looks like shit. Yeah the video is high quality and high frame rate, but it looks amateur and cheap and sterile and as a result makes it harder to suspend disbelief. I don’t believe when I watch this style.
@@kpag3030 get with the times gramps
I think it's interesting to see what works and what doesn't. In 60p, gestures and affects have to be much quicker, more instinctual - especially in a situation such as this. Movements must be less restrained and more reckless (which is harder on both stuntmen and actors alike). Vin makes a hero comment before rushing in... that may or may not work, depending on what it is. I think it seems a bit unnatural here, but since he is in cover, it's ok for him to take the time to talk before acting.
The good:
The shooting is fantastic. The explosions are fantastic. The rockets work. The soldiers fighting seem totally absorbed in their task, and I believe it. The fight in the tunnel works really well, up to the point where he dies, when you can tell that it's fake.
The bad:
The two guys who come out of nowhere to snatch Diesel's character, seem unnatural (why didn't anyone spot them? There were dust, but not enough to obscure them... and they never would have attempted something like that, no matter how fanatical they are). When the soldier reaches the wounded vin Diesel... stopping there _in plain view of the enemy_ to have dialogue... that might possibly work(ish) in 24p, but in 60p it sticks out like a sore thumb. The enemy being blown up by the .50 doesn't work at all either (although that particular CGI is probably quite iffy even in 24p).
I still think 60p (or higher) can - provided it's well made - provide an experience beyond what is possible in 24, but I also think its proponents underestimate the challenges that comes with that amount of information. When some things look natural and others clearly don't, you get yanked out of your state of suspended disbelief.
That's a challenge, filmmakers are afraid to take. Doing 60p in a way it looks.
Very good analysis.
I do not understand why framerate changes your perception of what is happening in these scenes. Like, at all.
Did you actually watch this in 30 fps? What makes it so different to you? The only difference I'm seeing is that is smooth and the other is blurrier and stuttery, but it doesn't change the acting to me at all. I legitimately don't understand how you can reach your conclusion.
@@Thornskade Fair enough question. As you are alluding to, the factual information of what takes place is obviously not altered. But: take the scene around 2:36 where the soldier runs up to a wounded friendly in the middle of open ground with a trench right next to them. This is the kind of reaction I am expecting next...
th-cam.com/video/Zx9Amrs5lIg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/WDpOawqg5i4/w-d-xo.html
...but instead, he decides that this is the perfect time and place to sit down and have some dialogue. sigh.
If it didn't already, it probably strikes you too as pretty dumb after I point it out, and would be dumb even in 24 fps. But the issue seems to be that your brain gets conditioned by the smooth pictures and landscapes and explosions and casings flying to think that "yes, there is really a firefight going on there" - in effect, you start to expect perfection. I would call this an action choreography mistake no matter which way you cut it, but judged against the standards of a totally amazing firefight just moments before, it stands out that much more. When the action cannot follow up expectations, your brain stops believing in what's going on. There is clearly no firefight going on around there, in spite of what the movie is insisting.
In addition to reactions needing to be more logical and instinctual; timing must also be tighter. Not just for stunts (which may or may not adversely affect safety), but actors need to hit their mark that much more accurately - not emoting too late (psychopath face), but also not too soon (clearly rehearsed). Their margin for error is that much narrower. The amount of expression needed to convey an emotion changes a bit too. I think method actors will probably have an advantage in hfr, since they tend to rely on their bodies acting once the emotion hits. But make no mistake: it heightens the standard we hold performers to.
The same applies to sets. Hollywood has over the years learned what can be used to fake other materials in set design - but most of them are still of such a type that you could tell it was fake if you saw it in person. It is a necessary evil - both for safety and costs - and it's usually ok in 24fps unless you get very close up shots of that set. Which you won't, because the director planned it out that way (that's why he didn't ask the set people to go get an authentic piece). In 60 or 120 fps, you start noticing. Your brain gets so many angles of the object and with such clarity that it goes "hey, wait a second, that's just painted wood!". The same goes for actor's faces. You can sometimes tell that they are wearing makeup.
So I'm absolutely not in FilmmakerIQ's camp of "24 is _better",_ but I am in the camp of "24 is _easier."_
@@Snagabott _But the issue seems to be that your brain gets conditioned by the smooth pictures and landscapes and explosions and casings flying to think that "yes, there is really a firefight going on there"_
I'm glad I'm not suffering from conditioning, but I am convinced the simple reality is that if you were used to movies looking like this, you wouldn't have come up with this odd explanation. I suspect you have simply seen a movie not look like it's suppposed to so you've been thinking about that, which has taken you out of it. And now you're looking for explanations other than the most obvious one: You're not used to it. You don't think "whoa there's really a fight going on there", you're going "huh, this movie doesn't look like other movies. Now I'm consciously thinking about everything to process the differences. Oh look, this scene is pretty stupid, totally wouldn't have noticed at 24 fps."
_timing must also be tighter. Not just for stunts (which may or may not adversely affect safety), but actors need to hit their mark that much more accurately - not emoting too late (psychopath face), but also not too soon (clearly rehearsed). Their margin for error is that much narrower._
This doesn't logically hold up at all. If an actor emotes/acts too soon in a 24 fps film, this _may_ get delayed by a frame and hit the spot. But if they emote/act just a liiittle too late, their emotion is delayed by an entire frame, so it's way too late, rather than just a bit too late as it were in a higher framerate film. Lower framerates don't give you more leeway for acting at all, and the timing of when each frame is captured is effectively random and imperceivable to both actors and directors so you can't account for it to begin with.
_The amount of expression needed to convey an emotion changes a bit too._
I see no logical reason for this. Can you please elaborate on that claim?
_But make no mistake: it heightens the standard we hold performers to. _
Watching these film clips in both 30 and 60 fps, the performance doesn't look any different to me. I have no idea how you would reach that conclusion, other than what I discussed in the first paragraph.
If the framerate was even lower to the point that you no longer perceive motion but rather a string of attached images, I would agree. This does have the effect that the actor's movements don't have to be very "perfect", so to speak. However, at least for my perception 24 fps and 30 fps is already way past the point of only seeing still images. I see the same acting whether it's 24 fps or 120. I would agree that _fast_ movements get masked with motion blur, however from the research I've done on this subject you can achieve similar motion blur shooting at high framerates.
_The same applies to sets. Hollywood has over the years learned what can be used to fake other materials in set design - but most of them are still of such a type that you could tell it was fake if you saw it in person. It is a necessary evil - both for safety and costs - and it's usually ok in 24fps unless you get very close up shots of that set. Which you won't, because the director planned it out that way (that's why he didn't ask the set people to go get an authentic piece). In 60 or 120 fps, you start noticing. Your brain gets so many angles of the object and with such clarity that it goes "hey, wait a second, that's just painted wood!". The same goes for actor's faces. You can sometimes tell that they are wearing makeup. _
I can mostly agree with this. I do not believe that you get "more angles" of each object. The angles are the same, the difference between one more inserted frame is fairly irrelevant, and you don't just randomly see more details. A still shot of a set looks the exact same in 1 fps or 120 fps. But what you're saying has truth to it due to stuttering during panning shots or when something is moving by the screen, making it hard to focus on and track something which has movement in 24 fps films, and so while panning shots in low framerate films have always given me eye cancer from all the stutter, it does mean I don't really get to focus on the details of whatever it is that's stuttering by. This is where 60 fps or 120 fps movies definitely have to put in some extra work if they're trying to mask imperfections of a set or of special effects.
I absolutely agree of course that shooting in 24 fps is easier. If not for most of the things mentioned here, then there's definitely more work in post-production, especially for special effects. There's also the fact that these films take up more space and the effort only pays off in cinemas and for the Blu-Ray release, as streaming services do not allow for such high fidelity yet to my knowledge. This is more of a catch-22 though; I would overall prefer to watch films in higher framerates.
60 frames looks amazing. The challenge for filmmakers is to make way better VFX when using this frame rate, because anything badly done, will be obvious.
Sitcoms and soap operas were contending with framerates that high 70 years ago. The techniques are there, and well-documented. But nothing is going to make 60 fps look like a movie.
No it doesn't... There is a reason movies play in 24 fps
@@pwowp8848 tradition, that's why. There is not right and wrong, its a matter of taste
@@pikasalsachu thats why still watch movies without colour...right ..cause of tradition...dumbest reply ever
@@pwowp8848 you can say what you want, but you dont have to be a jerk, and if you know something about film history which I studied, it is tradition, you can ask Marty Scorsese, he loves talking about that stuff. Oh and By the way, if this bothers you, get some help
Holy macaroni my phone's hdr went haywire and started flickering like a broken bulb 😂😂
This is so crisp and beautiful on the IPhone 12 Pro Max
Acting just sticks out so much to me in 60FPS.
i mean everyone knows that is acting to 24 fps or 2000 fps
Wow, awesome 60FPS + 4K
2:51 - The Sound 🔥🔥
Finally a movie that doesn’t make the muzzle flare bigger than a nuclear bomb when it comes out of the gun IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DAY.
60fps movies are amazing
Definitely
I don't know why every stupid people hates 60fps movies but for me this is a different level.
This!!! Is 4k!! Whoaaa
Goddamn this 4K made this clip look SO REAL. amazing!! 🤩🤩🤩
This is the age when you can see videos of this quality on TH-cam🤩
Holy shit this looks amazing
Quick Guide. How you do not need to fight in a war. This is flock of rams.
The video quality is excellent. My compliments to the author.
This how they should broadcast sporting events
Believe it or not, it was as if I myself were there...😳
Shoot at 120fps -> edit-> export in 48fps it looks 🔥
I feel like watching live news footage not a movie.
Yeah, but live news footage that’s faked. The bad acting is even more evident with this raw unfiltered high frame rate style.
YOU ARE VERY RIGHT ,IT IS LIKE AN ACTION SOAP OPERA
@@kpag3030 Frame rate does not make that stuff more apparent. It has more to do with the lighting and how high def it is.
@@anonymousanonymous5732 No, it's because of the framerate.
I didn't knew that my Poco F1 can play HDR on You tube....Poco rocks !!👌
Toretto turned into a Soldier but he didn't betrayed his family
It looks like call of duty bro in a real life haha
gosh the uniforms so clean
A lot of the actors are stiff, choreography is sloppy, and I think the framerate really reveals unsure actions. Special effects could use some work, too, and maybe a greater use of practical explosions and squibs would work really well at a high framerate. That being said, when Vin was on screen, it seemed completely natural and nothing he did took me out of the experience. I think this is just something directors and actors are going to have to learn to work with.
There will likely need to be an animated movie that comes first and proves what is possible at a high framerate. Until directors and actors overcome that learning curve, the majority of shots are going to look more like a play than a movie.
Thank you for your thoughts, Beta Cuck Alpha. I agree with that analysis.
Came here for Gemini Man announcement using the 60fps encoding on the 4K release. I'm excited to see what it looks like in the former.
2:44 When you run out of VFX budget
Lo probé en unos AirPods Pro y dale que escucho a detalle cada bala JAJAJ increíble
How can I get this movie full
M4 with 4x !
Bro, how do you handle that recoil ?
As Space drives is not a concern, My brain likes it, jejeje the fans of my laptop are working finally now and my brain resting cause is not fullfilling the 24 cinematic xperience 😂
Poor Vin Diesel. He really has no luck when he's a soldier. First in Saving Private Ryan. Now this.
Thats 2 movies lol. Only 2 roles. 🤣🤣
@@KingKsEDC so
even in bloodshot
Don’t forget the pacifier!!
Looks awsome in 4k60fps. Wish all movies be like this.
looks epic
I actually don't mind it. Having gotten more and more into gaming, it's not as jarring as I thought it would be. Feels almost more like a documentary than a film in some parts. I do wonder though if you went with a bolder look in the color grade if that would help make it feel more like a movie. Maybe there is a nice in between you could do. The color was the only thing not working entirely for me.
Cool, man. It is real scene. How did you get that?
I actually dowloaded this and interpolated it to 120fps/hz in my TV, insane
Is there a link to the movie on youtube?
zeen amir this is not a free movie
Where can I find movies like this quality Even a Netflix or STARZPLAY or OSN HBO all of them didn't have this quality where can I found it ???????????
Buy Blu-rays.
Why is people been so hard with this kind of video settings and clarity? I've already watched the ones from gemini man and honestly it looks awesome, I know my reference in mobile is a Xiaomi Mi A1 and a Sharp 4k 60 hz tv but still looks amazing, imagine in a better panel. Would this be a perfect example to tell those detractors of this quality "the future is now old men?" I wouldn't mind watching the whole movie like this, it is like you are live, in there and the details are amazing, water drops, explotions, I mean everything!
I know, right? Somehow. people hate high FPS movies.
"Too real"
"Its not a movie"
"Too perfect"
"Its like documentary"
"less perfect of 24 FPS would be nice"
I really dont get them. Coz this looks awesome.
24FPS is there because it the minimum FPS human mind start the movements. More than that, they gonna need bigger film roll for the same duration of clips. Making the cost higher.
Maybe people still doesnt get used to it. Maybe they love the fantasy and the "un-realistic" aspect of usual movies. Might be still need time. Maybe film maker need to get several adaption. Maybe this will be the stuff our grand child can accept. They might gonna say something like "Ugh, 24FPS is such a last millenia"
Is there a full movie available with 60 fps instead of clips. Pls reply
Bruh i feel in war with 1080p
Is there a link to the movie on youtube?
That was crazy
Lo estoy viendo en 480p y se ve... uff, preciosoo ya quiero verlo en 4K HDR 60fps, gracias por estos clips y los de Geminis Man
Como se llama esa película
@@lucilamendoza6607 "Iluminados por el fuego"
The watching exlerience on my nokia 3310 is phenomenal
🇲🇦🇲🇦❤️❤️
This movie was filmed in Morocco
The crispness.
Why is this video smoother than my vision😭
How do you get the clip this smooth? I'm watching on my S20+ and would love to watch all movies in
It was shot at a HFR. Only a few films have been shot at frame rates higher than 24fps: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_with_high_frame_rates
Smoothvideo project
Here's another sample 4K 60fps video from same movie:
th-cam.com/video/MfODTUIoTvg/w-d-xo.html
holy shit, my eyes has been blessed. Film industry need to move on to 60fps. 24fps feels so choppy and outdated
Is there a place that I could download this clip? Or could you possibly send it to me? Pls?
use something like youtube downloader.
Salute to all soldiers
Can anyone tell me from which movie this fragment is?😀😀😀
wow it is so real
What movie is this ?
Looks super crisp on my LG CX
Is there whole movie in 60fps?
The military worked for this country so well😢
Where can I buy and watch this movie in 4K 60fps HDR digitally? Don't recommend youtube or google play... I just bought Gemini Man and found out they only support 480p on Desktop PC.
60 fps looks like a home video. 24 looks cinematic
I'm sorry I'm using a translator, but I can't find the name of the movie, it looks very good and I would like to watch it complete, can you please help me
Leader: Cease fire!!!
Soldiers: Shoot more???
🎯 TH-camr GATURKS says: Intense!!!!!!!!😯😯😯😯 High FPS takes it to a whole new level I LOVE IT!!!!!!! I can't even imagine what 120 fps would look like!!!!!!🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
santa madre de la cachetada necesito mas, denme mas
why Netflix doesn't have that screen size, it looks shorter with tow black bands.
I mean it looks even better than real life. New technology has even become better than our own 👀
Can I find a full movie in 4k and 60p quality? Or even the same short duration does not matter, the important is the quality of 4K and 60p ?
Alguém pode me dizer o nome desse filme?
How do people have 4k HD cameras? It makes the scene even better.
i literally have one on my phone
Wish more War films can be made in this way. 60FPS or 120FPS looks dope.
Genial 4k
WOW
The fact that the movie was filmed to 120 fps look more accurate to a game
Wow😳
It looks silky smooth on my iPad Pro with Pro Motion enable.
Too bad my internets trash... starts dropping frames and has to stop to buffer constantly :(
how can i make download of this as 60fps
Anyone knows how to makes movie smooth like this?
¿Nombre de la pelicula?.
Title please...
wow how to do that smooth 60 fps but how to do the converter 60 fps like 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
The cracks on my phone screen makes this way more realistic
is this 4k HDR TV