Hegel: Being-in-itself, Being-for-itself, Being-in-and-for-itself

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @adambernache3210
    @adambernache3210 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Everything is becoming.

  • @sky.the.infinite
    @sky.the.infinite ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think about these concepts *_sooo_* often.
    Nice to see it in its philosophical context 🤓

  • @Dominis.
    @Dominis. ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is there a book comparing Hegel and Heidegger? Are their concepts similar enough?

    • @AntonioWolfphilosophy
      @AntonioWolfphilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Probably quite a few, but I have never read any. Ask @JohannesNiederhauser

  • @kentheengineer592
    @kentheengineer592 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah i Dont Really See distinguishment

  • @dubbelkastrull
    @dubbelkastrull 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you provide the references for these specific subjects?

    • @AntonioWolfphilosophy
      @AntonioWolfphilosophy  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, I can't because what is presented here is a generalized sense abstracted and analogized from the use of the terms across many texts. The direct technical sense works with what I state, yet it is very difficult for people to grasp them because they are even more abstract than the sense in the Phenomenology, where they are already abstract because Hegel also never spells them out since you are expected to see the sense in the context of use. What I stated is found in no specific text itself.