Mod-01 Lec-38 The concept of being-in-itself, being-for-itself and being-for-others

[@ashima6]

I literally can't thank you in words professor........ your explanation ❤

[@franciskm4144]

This category is framed by Hegel. But no one quotes him. Being in itself being for itself and being for other, these three are discussed in Phenomenology of spirit. 🙏 Thanks and best wishes 🎉 Try to read Hegel's original works. You are an excellent teacher. Best wishes 🎉

[@wonderfacts7782]

Thank you professor. You make my day. ☺️

[@thevivisector3983]

Was struggling with these concepts for such a long time👍👍👍
Just started reading Being and Nothingness

[@jjjuilfs9793]

best video on this subject by far

[@germaineeyike6886]

thank you sir, i enjoyed and understood the concepts

[@pateazolut7970]

superb in articulation. thanks alot

[@hinamushtaq5680]

Applausive.. Really helpful and good.

[@lakminikumari46]

thank you sir! Its really helpful to my dissertation.

[@ayinka4040]

damn, fully expected to skip after the first few minutes of watching, but this was actually pretty helpful!!

[@lucasnieva2662]

Yeah because of different ton of skin right?

[@atf5827]

this is great thank you

[@adnanjaffari1860]

Can being itself seprate from being for it self ?

[@paragvade]

Adnan jaffari Not completely. Rigid facts such as our biological parents, places where we were born etc will always remain intact. Hence being in itself will comprise minute but inseparable part of being for itself.

[@adnanjaffari1860]

Parag Vade thnkw

[@tarun19_99]

thank you

[@rsrandhawa786]

thank you sir

[@MrDan3808]

How do I see the complete lectures?

[@akkysexy]

th-cam.com/play/PLzf4HHlsQFwLHtNpVTXwA9pIvgqFmn1h6.html

[@neuronneuron3645]

It's the same as a western course but without a pretentious lecturer. Which makes me wonder, why are western philosophy lecturers so weird?

[@whalercumming9911]

As usual it takes a thick mustache and accent