It is very important to distinguish between expansion for the purpose of construction and spreading a true human culture and expansion based on a culture of harmful parasites! The culture of harmful parasites has been widespread for thousands of years, but it has become more severe and dangerous to humanity.
A brief and useful statement might be better: the cultural and civilizational gap that resulted from the destruction of Rome without the transfer of knowledge still continues to this moment. This does not mean that the Romans were civilized in the true sense, but they had something of value, and this is very clear through the arts of Roman architecture. Also, the dominance of religion due to the lack of mature thought continues to this moment, but the situation has become worse with the emergence of an extremist religious group at the top of the pyramid of power to fill the cultural and civilizational gap.
It is clear that the artifacts found in Africa belong to the local population, because of the type of architecture and the fact that they had made progress, and there is a resemblance to the most ancient Pharaonic artifacts, but that does not necessarily mean that they themselves were behind the Pharaonic architecture. The mentality in that region at that time was more civilized in terms of race and skin color (current racial discrimination). The pharaohs were ruled by kings and families from the regions surrounding Egypt at that time, such as Libya and Sudan. The current prevailing backward mentality did not exist in ancient times, and even the Romans were more civilized than current humans, regardless of the ideas resulting from the lack of accumulation of sufficient scientific knowledge.
The goal is constructive criticism, not destructive criticism with the aim of mocking or belittling others, as that is absolutely incorrect. For example, Arabs have been criticized more harshly. The goal in the end is to build a true human civilization, regardless of who builds it, as in the end they are all human beings, and the goal is to serve humanity and its progress, and it has nothing to do with morbid claims of superiority. Accepting criticism for the purpose of development is the only way, instead of entering into a spiral of new sick illusions.
It is very difficult for the physical structure of humans to change even if they were separated tens of thousands of years ago on planet earth, because it is the most suitable structure for beings with a high level of consciousness type one , and even if a genetic mutation occurred in one of the human groups and their appearance changed, that would not change anything because their essence is a human essence (humans did not agree and coexist out of nothing , but because their essence is one and the same, which are human characteristics “Humanity“).
The idea of racial superiority has prevailed over thousands of years, especially in the last five centuries, and the mentality of the ruling class influences scientific research, for example, exploration missions supervised by the dominant countries and the entourage of the ruling class in those countries, and naturally this mentality influences the funding processes and thus who conducts that research. Even during wars, for example, the destruction and looting of antiquities in Iraq was done systematically for religious reasons related to who leads the red bull.
It is difficult to know the origin of humans currently. Humans will need sufficient scientific accumulation and advanced technology to know how humans originated, and it is not the primitive method currently followed. The current method for knowing the origin and emergence of humans will remain mere guesses at most.
Until now, there is nothing certain about the origin of humans and their spread across the continents. They are just guesses. The most logical thing is that the five continents were connected or closer. It is certain that the origin of humans is one, but no one can confirm the place and time of the appearance of the first humans (humans origin).
There is a real problem that has not been noticed yet, although it has been mentioned previously: the idea of cultural superiority through Western colonialism, especially in Asia, Africa, Australia and America, is absolutely incorrect. It is basically a culture of harmful parasites and the idea of intellectual and cultural superiority does not exist at al till this moment (no real civilisation)l. This is due to several reasons that were mentioned previously when talking about the tribes that destroyed Rome and the lack of transfer of knowledge from the Roman civilization and then the Dark Ages and then the Renaissance through rediscovery. The details can be easily observed through the architectural development in Europe and its true source (it is necessary to study Roman, Greek, Pharaonic architecture, etc.) to understand how architecture appeared in Europe, as most of it is just an imitation of ancient architecture.
12:20 Very superficial and biased talk! First of all, most of the people of North Africa are not Arabs in the current concept, but rather they are indigenous people, and what is currently appearing is due to the spread of the Arabic language through the spread of the Islamic religion (the concept of nationalism linked to language and religion, not race), meaning that the origins of most of the people of North Africa are not the Arabian Peninsula, just like what happened in New Zealand, Australia and South Africa, where the English language spread due to British colonialism, with differences such as the dominance of religion in the case of North Africa.
It is very important to distinguish between expansion for the purpose of construction and spreading a true human culture and expansion based on a culture of harmful parasites! The culture of harmful parasites has been widespread for thousands of years, but it has become more severe and dangerous to humanity.
A brief and useful statement might be better: the cultural and civilizational gap that resulted from the destruction of Rome without the transfer of knowledge still continues to this moment. This does not mean that the Romans were civilized in the true sense, but they had something of value, and this is very clear through the arts of Roman architecture. Also, the dominance of religion due to the lack of mature thought continues to this moment, but the situation has become worse with the emergence of an extremist religious group at the top of the pyramid of power to fill the cultural and civilizational gap.
It is clear that the artifacts found in Africa belong to the local population, because of the type of architecture and the fact that they had made progress, and there is a resemblance to the most ancient Pharaonic artifacts, but that does not necessarily mean that they themselves were behind the Pharaonic architecture. The mentality in that region at that time was more civilized in terms of race and skin color (current racial discrimination). The pharaohs were ruled by kings and families from the regions surrounding Egypt at that time, such as Libya and Sudan. The current prevailing backward mentality did not exist in ancient times, and even the Romans were more civilized than current humans, regardless of the ideas resulting from the lack of accumulation of sufficient scientific knowledge.
The goal is constructive criticism, not destructive criticism with the aim of mocking or belittling others, as that is absolutely incorrect. For example, Arabs have been criticized more harshly. The goal in the end is to build a true human civilization, regardless of who builds it, as in the end they are all human beings, and the goal is to serve humanity and its progress, and it has nothing to do with morbid claims of superiority. Accepting criticism for the purpose of development is the only way, instead of entering into a spiral of new sick illusions.
It is very difficult for the physical structure of humans to change even if they were separated tens of thousands of years ago on planet earth, because it is the most suitable structure for beings with a high level of consciousness type one , and even if a genetic mutation occurred in one of the human groups and their appearance changed, that would not change anything because their essence is a human essence (humans did not agree and coexist out of nothing , but because their essence is one and the same, which are human characteristics “Humanity“).
The idea of racial superiority has prevailed over thousands of years, especially in the last five centuries, and the mentality of the ruling class influences scientific research, for example, exploration missions supervised by the dominant countries and the entourage of the ruling class in those countries, and naturally this mentality influences the funding processes and thus who conducts that research. Even during wars, for example, the destruction and looting of antiquities in Iraq was done systematically for religious reasons related to who leads the red bull.
It is difficult to know the origin of humans currently. Humans will need sufficient scientific accumulation and advanced technology to know how humans originated, and it is not the primitive method currently followed. The current method for knowing the origin and emergence of humans will remain mere guesses at most.
Until now, there is nothing certain about the origin of humans and their spread across the continents. They are just guesses. The most logical thing is that the five continents were connected or closer. It is certain that the origin of humans is one, but no one can confirm the place and time of the appearance of the first humans (humans origin).
There is a real problem that has not been noticed yet, although it has been mentioned previously: the idea of cultural superiority through Western colonialism, especially in Asia, Africa, Australia and America, is absolutely incorrect. It is basically a culture of harmful parasites and the idea of intellectual and cultural superiority does not exist at al till this moment (no real civilisation)l. This is due to several reasons that were mentioned previously when talking about the tribes that destroyed Rome and the lack of transfer of knowledge from the Roman civilization and then the Dark Ages and then the Renaissance through rediscovery. The details can be easily observed through the architectural development in Europe and its true source (it is necessary to study Roman, Greek, Pharaonic architecture, etc.) to understand how architecture appeared in Europe, as most of it is just an imitation of ancient architecture.
12:20 Very superficial and biased talk! First of all, most of the people of North Africa are not Arabs in the current concept, but rather they are indigenous people, and what is currently appearing is due to the spread of the Arabic language through the spread of the Islamic religion (the concept of nationalism linked to language and religion, not race), meaning that the origins of most of the people of North Africa are not the Arabian Peninsula, just like what happened in New Zealand, Australia and South Africa, where the English language spread due to British colonialism, with differences such as the dominance of religion in the case of North Africa.