I just got the Maverick XLT hybrid....love it! Just enough a truck to get done what the average person needs, with high mileage, and easy to customize! 😊
I was lucky and found a Maverick tremor lariat for less than MSRP… basically another customer ordered it and it didn’t come on soon enough for them. Needless to say I got a great deal…. It says 24 highway… I’m averaging 28-29 on the highway… great vehicle!
I just got a 2024 Maverick Lariat hybrid and loving it. Traded in my 2014 Chevy Silverado 1500, and I do not miss the size. Also, the gas mileage on my hybrid is amazing. I got 507 miles on the first tank of gas, 13-gallon tank. That is a hug savings versus my Silverado that was averaging 15 to 16 mpg and had a 23 gallon tank.
I think most people need to be realistic with what their intended use will be. I've been stuck in that mindset with previous purchases where I needed the top of the line 4x4 model with the FX4 package etc and I never once took it off road. Ended up being a mall crawler.
It was tough for me to decide. Ive been debating between the two, and I eventually decided to custom order a Maverick(XLT FX4). Mainly I wanted it to fit in my garage, and the ranger is too big for mine. Tough choice since i'm seeing rangers now 3k off MSRP at the dealer.
You can get a Maverick XL for a lot less money than these two trucks. Not everyone needs a Lariat with all that extra equipment. My Maverick XL has the Ecoboost engine and averages between 28 and 29 miles per gallon.
Of course. If you are ok with a bare bones work truck trim. Most people at my dealership are buying the XL Maverick. Personally, I would go with the XLT all Day.
@@calebniederhofer6529 The XLT is a nice truck. I just don't think it's worth $2,500 more than the XL. It's a matter of personal preference and how much you want to spend.
@@calebniederhofer6529 The XLT is a good truck. I just don't think it's worth $2,500 dollars more than the XL. The nicer interior is the only thing I would like. Other than that the XL has cruise and the options I want.
The 2.3 has port and direct injection, the 2.0 only has direct injection. That will help prevent carbon issues in the 2.3. Obviously, people should ignore service recommendations and change the oil daily in all direct engine vehicles.
There is 5mpg hwy mpg difference between the Maverick. That's a lot if your driving hwy please don't compare stock ranger vs a lifted Maverick with larger tires when comparing fuel economy. The Maverick has comparable front seat leg and head room but the Maverick has more rear leg room in the ecoboost. What you gain in the Ranger is a little shoulder and hip room. Majority of the time if a daily driver it's one person. I would think having a better ride, handling better and better fuel economy without sacrificing significant interior room the Maverick is a better truck. That is if the carrying capacity and towing capacity is within the buyers parameters. Just for the record the Maverick bed is 33.6 the Ranger 45.3 cubic ft so that also maybe a determining factor. Just curious the video said it was 11000 difference but the Ranger didn't have the similar slide lok system in the bed and did the 11000 include the additional 500 for the bed line? Keep in mind I may be a little biased. A few months ago I bought a Ford Maverick FX4, 4K tow, P235 AT tires. Luckily I have been getting high mpg than what it is projected, I'm not complaining. I can understand why you liked or preferred the Maverick, it's a very nice truck. Thanks for the video
@@PerformanceOnWheels Even stock your driving may be different than someone else. That's why I posted the difference that Ford has on the window sticker. I didn't post what I have gotten if I did it would have been a lot higher. Hwy mpg posted is Ranger 24 with a 4x4 and Maverick AWD 29 is where I got the difference of 5 mpg hwy. Then again it's a lot lower if city or mixed. Fortunately or unfortunately depending how you look at, majority of my driving is 2 lane hwy. Yeah the mileage your getting sucks. Kind of defeats the purpose of getting the Maverick. Also the Maverick without the lift and tires is a whole lot easier to get in or out of the cab. Also the lower bed height makes it easier to load or get things in and out of the bed. Even the standard Maverick AWD has 8.6 inches of ground clearance. If you get the optional P235 it increases it .255 so a ground clearance of 8.855 not much difference from the Ranger's 9.3. Unless you need more than the 9.3. The Maverick is very capable with all the benefits I mentioned. I'm surprised you didn't touch on how much easier ingres, egress and loading on the Mav? For the short time I've owned and used it, I'm thoroughly impressed with it's pros. I to think not only the small infortainment screen but synch 3 vs synch 4 which I believe the Ranger has. Hopefully that and the rear seat gets a split bench seat in the 2025 Maverick. I think the big news if they offer the hybrid in AWD for 2025 on the Maverick.
The Ranger better be a more capable truck with a $8800 base price over the Maverick $23.920 vs $32.720, the Maverick is affordable for seniors on a fixed income, the Ranger is not. That's the deciding factor right there!
I just got the Maverick XLT hybrid....love it! Just enough a truck to get done what the average person needs, with high mileage, and easy to customize! 😊
Same here. Just picked up a XLT hybrid with black appearance package. I absolutely love this small truck.
Can give a few examples of easy to customize?
I was lucky and found a Maverick tremor lariat for less than MSRP… basically another customer ordered it and it didn’t come on soon enough for them. Needless to say I got a great deal…. It says 24 highway… I’m averaging 28-29 on the highway… great vehicle!
I just got a 2024 Maverick Lariat hybrid and loving it. Traded in my 2014 Chevy Silverado 1500, and I do not miss the size. Also, the gas mileage on my hybrid is amazing. I got 507 miles on the first tank of gas, 13-gallon tank. That is a hug savings versus my Silverado that was averaging 15 to 16 mpg and had a 23 gallon tank.
Have a maverick hybrid I do building and remodeling and concrete, and I use this TRUCK more then a full size truck
Maverick hands down.
I think most people need to be realistic with what their intended use will be. I've been stuck in that mindset with previous purchases where I needed the top of the line 4x4 model with the FX4 package etc and I never once took it off road. Ended up being a mall crawler.
I’m sure more people if they were truthful, would admit the same!
I have a Hybrid Maverick Lariat and love it versatility, great gas mileage, and for the most part spacious.
Test drive both the other day, and I preferred the Maverick. Ranger felt like it needed a V6, but the i4 Turbo felt perfect for the smaller Maverick.
It was tough for me to decide. Ive been debating between the two, and I eventually decided to custom order a Maverick(XLT FX4). Mainly I wanted it to fit in my garage, and the ranger is too big for mine. Tough choice since i'm seeing rangers now 3k off MSRP at the dealer.
Absolutely love that Maverick
I just got the Ranger XLT with some nice options and I love it, Ranger for me, it’s in Cactus Gray 2.3 L turbo I’m so pleased with it.
Sounds nice 👍🏻 both are great trucks
Ranger with the 2.7 liter V6 turbo
FX4 Ranger XLT with the V6 that is coming would be my pick.
I want one of these two. I'm thinking Maverick XLT Tremor.
The XL maverick has manual locking tailgate, probably kept the key hole on all trims accordingly
Over 50K for a pickup in crazy.
Ur moms crazy
You can get a Maverick XL for a lot less money than these two trucks. Not everyone needs a Lariat with all that extra equipment. My Maverick XL has the Ecoboost engine and averages between 28 and 29 miles per gallon.
Of course. If you are ok with a bare bones work truck trim. Most people at my dealership are buying the XL Maverick. Personally, I would go with the XLT all Day.
@@calebniederhofer6529 The XLT is a nice truck. I just don't think it's worth $2,500 more than the XL. It's a matter of personal preference and how much you want to spend.
@@calebniederhofer6529 The XLT is a good truck. I just don't think it's worth $2,500 dollars more than the XL. The nicer interior is the only thing I would like. Other than that the XL has cruise and the options I want.
I got mav xl 2024. Love the drive. So much better than aa focus 16
When is the V6 going to be available in the Variat? and EPA?
The V6 is available for order now.
Ranger
one is car with a tiny bed, the other is truck with frame.....
7500 miles lariat tremor 27.6 mpg average 33mpg best seen
Maverick right?
I have the Xlt Fx4 Ford really sucks on their tired choice for the Fx4 same thing with my last one i like the truck but i’m not in love with the truck
What size are the rims and tires on this Maverick?
18s 31.5 inch tires
Ok. Thx. I have a lariat tremor. Does my current lift cover that size tires?
For that size of tire you will need 2 inch lift still
How much did that lift affect your gas?
The lift, not much at all. The wheels and tires, a lot.
@PerformanceOnWheels what size? Get any scraping?
@@PerformanceOnWheels how much did the wheels affect it?
About 10 mpg
@@PerformanceOnWheels oh wow thats kind of alot. trying to perfect the tires and wheels that still look cool but don't affect mpg too much
The 2.3 has port and direct injection, the 2.0 only has direct injection. That will help prevent carbon issues in the 2.3. Obviously, people should ignore service recommendations and change the oil daily in all direct engine vehicles.
You are incorrect. The 2.3 is direct injection. The 2.7 v6 is direct and port injection.
2.3 does not have port and direct, many 2.3s with high mileage have heavy carbon build up the engine has been around awhile
@@CS-zz2bf You're right, I was misinformed, I hope Ford rectifies that soon.
The 2.3 eco-boost in the 2024 Mustang does have direct and port injections. This is a fact
There is 5mpg hwy mpg difference between the Maverick. That's a lot if your driving hwy please don't compare stock ranger vs a lifted Maverick with larger tires when comparing fuel economy. The Maverick has comparable front seat leg and head room but the Maverick has more rear leg room in the ecoboost. What you gain in the Ranger is a little shoulder and hip room. Majority of the time if a daily driver it's one person. I would think having a better ride, handling better and better fuel economy without sacrificing significant interior room the Maverick is a better truck. That is if the carrying capacity and towing capacity is within the buyers parameters. Just for the record the Maverick bed is 33.6 the Ranger 45.3 cubic ft so that also maybe a determining factor. Just curious the video said it was 11000 difference but the Ranger didn't have the similar slide lok system in the bed and did the 11000 include the additional 500 for the bed line?
Keep in mind I may be a little biased. A few months ago I bought a Ford Maverick FX4, 4K tow, P235 AT tires. Luckily I have been getting high mpg than what it is projected, I'm not complaining. I can understand why you liked or preferred the Maverick, it's a very nice truck. Thanks for the video
I did not compare the lifted Maverick. I compared how my Maverick was stock. My lifted Maverick gets 14-16 mpg.. which is absolutely terrible I know
@@PerformanceOnWheels Even stock your driving may be different than someone else. That's why I posted the difference that Ford has on the window sticker. I didn't post what I have gotten if I did it would have been a lot higher. Hwy mpg posted is Ranger 24 with a 4x4 and Maverick AWD 29 is where I got the difference of 5 mpg hwy. Then again it's a lot lower if city or mixed. Fortunately or unfortunately depending how you look at, majority of my driving is 2 lane hwy. Yeah the mileage your getting sucks. Kind of defeats the purpose of getting the Maverick. Also the Maverick without the lift and tires is a whole lot easier to get in or out of the cab. Also the lower bed height makes it easier to load or get things in and out of the bed. Even the standard Maverick AWD has 8.6 inches of ground clearance. If you get the optional P235 it increases it .255 so a ground clearance of 8.855 not much difference from the Ranger's 9.3. Unless you need more than the 9.3. The Maverick is very capable with all the benefits I mentioned. I'm surprised you didn't touch on how much easier ingres, egress and loading on the Mav? For the short time I've owned and used it, I'm thoroughly impressed with it's pros. I to think not only the small infortainment screen but synch 3 vs synch 4 which I believe the Ranger has. Hopefully that and the rear seat gets a split bench seat in the 2025 Maverick. I think the big news if they offer the hybrid in AWD for 2025 on the Maverick.
My Maverick died on me, in rush hour on I-70 in Denver and almost killed me...all 2.0, 22-24s recalled. It's getting traded for a Ranger.
Can you tell me where I can go look up this information that they’ve been recalled?
Recall 24s24. 500k Bronco Sports and Mavericks. They'll die for no reason. I my BCM reprogrammed, and it still died.
Tfl dragged raced all the midsize trucks and the ranger 2.3 beat them all
The maverick is screaming for a manual transmission
💯
So is the ranger
range rover😝
The Ranger better be a more capable truck with a $8800 base price over the Maverick $23.920 vs $32.720, the Maverick is affordable for seniors on a fixed income, the Ranger is not. That's the deciding factor right there!