this is an amazing resource. Space faring movies and media should use this musical tones when traveling to these planets. The sounds do invoke the image of the corresponding planets in my mind. Specially Mercury and Jupiter.
With the formula at 2:07 and putting in the mass of the Earth of 5.972x10^24 kg with the radius of aphelion of 152.6x10^9 m and 147.5x10^9 m for perihelion respectively. Neither of both frecuencies give the values at 2:20 or 2:22 Can you bring in some context or maybe calculations for the results given?
Nevermind, I just found what it was, and I got some feedback. 1. The relationship between the variables at 1:30 is incorrect. Because Kepler's third law states that T^2 = k*r^3. So that solving for r^3/T^2 the numerator and denominator on the right hand side are backwards. 2. Also it seems that I didn't quite heard the part where it says SOLAR mass. My main mistake there 😅 it would be nice some notation like M_{sun} or something, but this is just me. 3. However, the notation described at 1:40 IS correct. Still though, depending on the sources used for the mass of the Sun and the distances of the aphelion and perihelion, it has a tiny numerical error. It was almost like if the Sun's mass was equal to 1.9x10^30, when the most astronomically recent value is nearer 1.989x10^30. Still though, amazing video ilustrates everything super well. Very clear!
![How the Bizarre Path of Mars Reshaped Astronomy [Kepler's Laws Part 1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Phscjl0u6TI/mqdefault.jpg)
This is phenomenal, deserves much more views
this is an amazing resource. Space faring movies and media should use this musical tones when traveling to these planets. The sounds do invoke the image of the corresponding planets in my mind. Specially Mercury and Jupiter.
With the formula at 2:07 and putting in the mass of the Earth of 5.972x10^24 kg with the radius of aphelion of 152.6x10^9 m and 147.5x10^9 m for perihelion respectively. Neither of both frecuencies give the values at 2:20 or 2:22
Can you bring in some context or maybe calculations for the results given?
Nevermind, I just found what it was, and I got some feedback.
1. The relationship between the variables at 1:30 is incorrect. Because Kepler's third law states that T^2 = k*r^3. So that solving for r^3/T^2 the numerator and denominator on the right hand side are backwards.
2. Also it seems that I didn't quite heard the part where it says SOLAR mass. My main mistake there 😅 it would be nice some notation like M_{sun} or something, but this is just me.
3. However, the notation described at 1:40 IS correct. Still though, depending on the sources used for the mass of the Sun and the distances of the aphelion and perihelion, it has a tiny numerical error. It was almost like if the Sun's mass was equal to 1.9x10^30, when the most astronomically recent value is nearer 1.989x10^30.
Still though, amazing video ilustrates everything super well. Very clear!
This is beyond excellent. Thank you so very much. 🌹
love it!!
Thank You! Well Done!
great info
How Venus is C#6 and sings in Alto???
Thank's is excelent the explication
🥧 👍🏼