Yep. I've been using RipJaws RAM for at least 10 years. I have never had a problem with RipJaws and I've installed it in all my machines and in the machines of several builds I did for family, friends, and customers.
it dosent really matter what brand you use today because 95% off all RAM Chips are one of the 4 big player Micron, Samsing and Hynix. Also the memory training algorithms of you memory controller are way better as it was at DDR2 and DDR3 as it was introduced the first time. But as long your Manufacturer of that Stick doesn't screwed up with the PCB and their Configuration controller aka SPD = Serial Presence Detect, this tells your System everything that is needed to work properly and based on this information RAM testing and training works its magic and may or may not improve things. i have never tested if this does something but is annoying anyway waiting 10min for 64gb ram and i personally run RAM on JEDAC settings because of stability under constant High bandwidth. I do work with my PC for the most time, and sometimes it runs a singular workload at 90% CPU and constantly accessing 20gb to 58gb RAM. XMP sucks if you do that type of workload, even your program could run faster but utilizing 30 threads at one with a 4 times overprovisioning, because disk IO times therefore reducing CPU idle time, this means i run about 120 threads at once. Sometimes over Days. but back to the RAM it self. Cheaper brands using the same chips so the quality on RAM is the same, But temperature managing or signal integrity can be a problem on them especial on those RGB junk. In fact RGB slows your system down, for 2 reasons. 1. CPU usage, you have to actively write to a certain memory address on the RAM. 2. Rank blocking, you can only read or write to the ram if your rank you try to access is available and only one task per cycle has access. Rank interliving is the reason why 4 sticks are slower as 2 stick on a dual channel system, also the bandwidth stays the same. But this isn't fully true, it depends on if you use Single Rank or Dual Rank RAM. Your Memory controller can access 1/2/4 ranks per channel. The reason is address bus bit size. Usually DDR4 is 65bit wide bus, but some Single ranks use a 128bit wide address bus those are double-sided, there are perfect for big files. In this case, only 1 task can access the RAM per channel. if you have a Single Sided RAM this doesn't change even with a second stick, the reason is both using the same data lines. Dual rank RAM is the most common type and uses both sides of a Channel, therefore your memory controller can access both Ranks at the same time. If your Memory controler supports this you could use 4 Rank modules, but this cuts your data lines in half. the Benefits of this is you can have 4 tasks access the RAM at the same time bit the data chunks are half in size as well. This is perfect for databases who handle small 1kb or less files. Your memory controller has a limitation of how many ranks are addressable in one channel, but this doesn't change the bandwidth, only the potential Capacity and the performance depending on your workload. The numbers of Channels on the other hand increases the bandwidth and how many tasks can access at the same time, but more channels means more space is needed for your RAM controller on your CPU and this doesn't scale well, that is why consumer PC have only 2 Channels and 4 Ranks per Channel (2 slots per Channel). but you can access only one slot per channel, therefore your system constantly switching between slots, the faster you update your pretty RGB, the less possibility has your program to access your RAM and your CPU decides holding your thread in one core for processing and fewer cores are now available for your program as well. In the end, the slower your whole system is, the more impact on performance it has.
It’s what I got and I don’t feel like it’s enough with 3070 8Gb when I have tabs open like TH-cam videos on my other monitor my game I’m playing stutters so bad
Pretty insane that we need 32 GB now just to have discord and a game running. And it's for sure 32 GB minimum because modern games will just get more demanding from here.
that's not true at all, I'm still running an absolute potato with ddr3 8gb on windows10. and I can easily run discord, 3 or more chrome tabs and pretty much any game you would want to run. and my PC still runs as normal
@@julienmarschall7518 okay, well that's really weird. because I've quite literally had AAA games open in the background and several chrome tabs open plus discord. and my PC runs absolutely fine. but with that being said, actually trying to run those AAA games in question at ultra settings would probably result in an explosion. but having them open in the background like the OP mentioned, my PC could handle without any problems
you did this test wrong fo a couple of reason. 1. different gpus with different amounts of vram. A video card with 8gb will offload more to the system ram than a 12gb card will. Shouldve used the exact same card in the systems 1a. You used different brands of gpu. Nvidia and AMD cards work completely differently to each other in regards to how their specific type of ram works while using dlss or the amd equivelant. 2. you didnt mention if you used dlss/ray tracing or not. 3. what speed was the ddr4 and ddr5? top speed ddr4 will outform low speed ddr5. 6. What timings and frequencies where was the ram running at?
They made it clear they weren’t comparing the DDR4 to the DDR5. So all DDR4 comparisons were on the same rig as each other and all DDR5 comparisons were on the same rig as each other. What’s the issue?
@@jeffleecust Basic scientific method rules. You don't want more than one variable that would affect the testing of your theory/question. Especially with PCs you'd want the highest GPU possible to prevent any limitations. Honestly Im surprised @cameronliddell9533 didnt mention not using Intel Cpus due to their ability to use both DDR4 & 5 for the same reasons prior.
you probably should've used the same gpu on each system so that there isn't any confusion for the ppl who don't necessarily understand what to look for, and at the same time you'd be showing the benefit of going with a newer platform.
@@buildyourcomputer For sure, and also one GPU has 8GB Vram while the other has 12GB, which can heavily influence 1%, .1% lows from what ive seen, often more than the amount of system Ram
I agree with this, its not really a fair comparison when most everything is completely different. Or at least use an RX7600 since its most comparable to the 4060.
Just took my gaming PC from 32 to 64GB. Because I wanted to. Have yet to find a single use for the extra memory, other than just being cool to have more RAM than I've ever had before.
@@Sweetguy1821 filling all the slots can slow down your memory. It's best to use the two slots listed in the manual. They even sell dummy sticks you can use to fill the slots for aesthetics.
I just built a PC with 64gb of RAM and with all of the games I've tested the PC is only using about 20% of that at peak usage. The GPU is getting a lot more utilization.
Depends heavily on games you play, me personally I am playing a old MMO where multiboxing is allowed and run the game with several instances (daily 6 at once and a couple of times a week with 30+ clients) using up around 70% of my RAM usage along with my 5950X almost maxed out.
@@lucas_m1740usually in idle computer uses around 3gb of ram. It only uses 13gb cuz that’s the amount left for it to use :) I had the same thing happen to me until I added another 16gb
16GB minimum, 32GB is nice to have, 64GB or more if you are running NASA models and have a supercomputer. I run 16GB in my HTPC and 32GB in my 2 other machines. Most of the games I play are older anyways, new games kinda universally suck. lol
Didn't watch the video? Typically. 16gb doesn't work well if you have discord open, share ur screen, have more than 1 monitor, have open internet tabs or anything. Just diagnosed a pc with stuttering during tarkov and Microsoft flight sim. The cause. 16gb of ram and discord open while playing. 32gb is minimum for gaming now.
Staying with ddr4 for a few more years :) Because everything I play runs perfectly with ddr4, and it's the same with my 4060 card, it can run everything I play perfectly and at max. I'm also not one of those people who just change because something is better, when what I have now just runs well :) But there are always some crazy people who want the newest and fastest all the time, so they can show a go score to their friends and brag a bit about the fact that they have now wasted a lot of money on something they absolutely DO NOT need
Yup, I love PC gaming as much as the next guy, but I love sticking with my hardware for as long as I can. I’m running in 6gb of vram and it’s still useable in 2024 Also, I never really understood the people who are constantly upgrading to the latest part the second they’re announced
I like my games to run good and also look good so I spend more lol 32gb of fast ddr5 with my rtx4070 super TI is perfect for me 🤷♂️ I gotta have max settings everytime
Agreed.. I will stick with my trusty old i9-9900k and 32Gb DDR4@3200MHz.. Only upgrade I have made for years, is a change from a ROG STRIX 2070 to an ASUS TUF 4060Ti As long as I can play the games I play (Destiny 2, Warframe, Diablo 4, Helldivers 2 and BF2042) at high to ultra settings and still get 60+ fps I am not changing..
I'm honestly really happy with 64GB. It lets me keep my chrome tabs open and play games at the same time. It also lets me run virtual machines while doing other things.
I've got a dual kit of 32 Gb Corsair Vengeance @6000 MHz DDR5 RGB in my main PC, and it's been very solid. I originally only had 16 GB of T-FORCE Vulcan @6000 MHz, but I decided to upgrade just because I had the extra money and I'm glad I did. I have used 16 GB for a past system @2666 Speeds, and it was terrible. so, the jump from 2666 to 6000 MHz dual channel was quite noticeable. like I mean... REALLY noticeable. love this kit of 6000 MHz ram from corsair so much.
For fortnite specifically you can enable replays that capture the game and avoid run to run variance by benchmarking the replay, if you go to career and then replays you can just play the same game over and over.
For gaming 32 GB is a Great start - for astro photography - 132 to 256 or 512 GB is fairly common. Your hobbies determine your needs - and if your gear has his much capability - you can do a lot more than simply play games. Modern GPUs with their abundance of CUDA cores can really streamline tasks that take a while. Sharpening a 73MB image of a nebula takes 16 minutes on my 36 core dual Xeon workstation - but when I used GPU rather than CPU based CUDA this task on my RTX 4070 shrinks to a minute!
As long as your total system usage is less than your total ram capacity, there is zero benefit to having more ram. The thing that really matters is Frequency and timings.
Each to their own but when 16 gig was the standard I started buying 32 gigs. When I noticed that some games with a few things running in the background started taking 22-25 gigs I moved to 64 gigs and have been there since the 9900k lol
I'm using 64GB ClL28 5600 (32X2) on a 7800X3d . I use 24GB for the Primocache game drive, and the rest available for the system/games. Primocache is being used to accelerate access times/load times for maximum performance, 5600 Cl28 is basically = to 6000 CL30 (10ms) latency for both.
In reality, unless you're doing content creation like 3D rendering (DAZ Studio) image editing, (Adobe Photoshop) video editing, (DivVinci Resolve), or 3D model creation, (Unreal Engine) you only need 16GB of RAM. It's always wise to check the RECOMMENDED specs of your games and not the REQUIRED specs of your games. A GOOD graphics card is your greatest ally when it comes to FPS performance, not RAM.
@@brucevandermescht6957 Unless the CPU has the GPU built in, (Intel Inegrated Graphics, for instance) you're absolutely wrong. If your GPU is handling the graphics processing, (that's why it's called a GPU) then that task is left to the GPU, not the CPU.
The amount of ram you NEED varies greatly on what your doing. Starfield for example will run with 16gb but of course runs better with 32gb. The Starfield Creation Kit however REQUIRES 32gb and recommends 48gb or higher. When building a PC or buying a pre made one find out how many slots you have and your maximum potential of your board and CPU. That way You have a future upgrade path that way no matter what you choose.
Is the shop open for the public? Ive been watching the videos for awhile now but just realized that you all are right across the bridge. Keep up the good work and great videos
going to 32 is going to help my GTX card out a lot. going from 140 to 180 may not be a lot for you but for me, someone who is experiencing stuttering it will smooth everything out. I struggle to maintain 75fps cause my lows are looooow. Rams in the mail. next upgrade will be GPU
CPU architecture to CPR architecture uses ram different ram is different. I’m saying remove all the variables. I see it kind of like you’re putting premium into one car and regular unleaded into another of two different sized engines.
The video is not comparing DDR4 vs DDR5, it’s how much you need for each platform independently. We do have plans to make a video discussing if DDR5 is worth it, but honestly all new platforms will have DDR5 only soon so it really isn’t a choice anymore Also with your car analogy , we are not racing those two cars against each other ;)
the goal was show how well it does the more ram you have, not how well it does the timings you want, keep in mind that most people never touch timigs to avoid stability problems, it is wasted time to play with those settings for hours and discover days later the pc is still unstable but you were sure it was
You tell about AM4 for gamming in 2025? Seriously? AM4 was released in 2016, AM5 in 2022. I will of course be playing on my Core 2 Duo in 2025, but there are builds for 2K on ultra settings.
I have 32GB trident g skill z5 neo rgb and my PC is fully optimized by the founder of FPSHub and they told me going to either 4 sticks or even 2 stick of total 64GB would be to much and more then likely slow me down cause I’d never utilize that much ram
Do the amount of dimms matter??? I was thinking of getting the recommended ram for my new AMD Ryzen 9800X3D that is going on my new AsRock X780E motherboard, but unfortunately it only comes in 2 dimms of 16GB for a total of 32GB. I need at least 42GB for Star Citizen for it to play well. So I was thinking of getting two packs, which would be 64GB over 4 dimms of G.skills Royal 6000 28 latency. Should that be okay??? Or should I find a different ram kit that has 2 dimms of 32gb for a total of 64gb???? Thank you for you time and I will like and subscribe
several tests prove that both intel and AMD struggle to handle 4 dimms. When using 4 dimms, usually the frequency of all of them drop to the minimum, so if I were you, I would go with a 2x 32GB to have 64GB total, and still get high frequency. For example, 2x 32GB would run at 5600mhz while 4x 16GB would run at 4800 or lower (even though each dimm individually could go up to 6000 or more). If amount of RAM is more important to you than frequency speed, then go for 4 dimms, but if higher memory frequency matters, then try as much as possible to stay with 2 dimms to make sure you are getting the max frequency possible.
@ yeah, I did further research and I since I purchased a 9800X3D, Asrock Taichi X870E, I ended up going with the AMD recommended 2 dimm set of G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5 6000 (2x32) for a total of 64gb. The reason I went with 64gb instead of 32gb, is that watching a reviewer I trust showed that for Star Citizen (the game I play the most), you need a minimum of 42gb of ram to get higher stable frame rates. I also play a lot of Helldivers 2, which only needs 32gb, but Star Citizen is my focus. Thank you very much for the information, I really appreciate you taking time out of your day to get back to me.
I'm curious, why did you guys chose not to have the same amount of ram minimum and maximum? With ddr4 you went as low as 16gb and with ddr5 you went as high as 64gb.
Between 16 and 32. The first as a minimum and the second for future proofing. Have 4x8 Gb G-Skill Tridentz 3600 C16 and they're quality. But I don't like that you can't disable RGB forever in BIOS.
The 16Gb sticks being dual module is the difference here meaning those sticks have 8Gb of ram on both sides to make up one 16Gb stick which is always going to run slightly faster than a single module 8Gb stick either way ALWAYS making sure to run them in dual channel mode as well makes a difference.
I initially had 16gig(2x8) then after few months I added two more sticks of the same brand so now it's 32gig (4x8). Pc feels to run much smoother, less hiccups lol and I can remain few apps open while gaming. You can't go wrong with adding more ram to your pc.
Plan on getting a rtx 5090 custom desktop from Origin. Think will go with 64gb or more for future proofing. If do 64gb is best to do 32gb x2 or 16gb x4.?
What about 24gb ddr5? I just bought a new gaming laptop with the rx 7700s and dual channel 16gb ddr5 ram. Im planning on replacing one of the 8gb sticks for a 16gb for a total oh 24gb at 4800mhz. Is it a good idea to go with this config? Also another question. By having different ram sizes would it affect the dual channel functionality or it wouldn't affect it at all?
32gb RAM here. I have a very modest system, but Diablo 4 was consuming outrageous amount of RAM (22GB) RAM is cheap - it's the most logical way to update your system
So is Ram fixing stuttering? i play on a i7 7700k (4,9ghz oc) and a 1080gtx. I tweaked the shit out of my computer and the game. I get +230 fps but got bad stutters to 60 fps randomly. Game is not enjoyable
I upgraded a year ago from 16GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16 to 32GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16. Since I upgraded my cpu 1-2 months ago from ryzen 5 1600 AF to ryzen 5 5500, now I can run quad channel xmp. I have 4 kingston fury beast 8GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16.
Hi so I just upgraded my old shit box I uypower from 8 gb ram to 48gb. Found some good cheap ram on sale ddr4 b360mb. I was wondering actually it’s running at 2133 lowest speeds. How do I get them to run at a higher speed. Is there a way to do this any help is appreciated thanks
What if you get fast 2x16gb pair now for 32gb of ram and if need be get another of the same pair later on, would the cpu have a problem running the same speeds on 4 sticks? Cause ppl say that amd cpu having that issue.
I already have 2x Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 CL32 38 38 96 1.35V AMD EXPO, does it work with intel motherboard MSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI, Socket 1700, ATX, Wi-Fi ? I dont want to overclock anything, just need to know, are they compatible ?
i have 16gb ddr4 in 2 laptops, 32gb ddr4 in a 3rd laptop, 32gb ddr4 in 1 desktop and 64gb ddr5 in the 2nd desktop. only 1 of the 16gb laptops isnt for gaming and is super old but i still use it for watching videos and surfing the web (all its good for anymore). i tend to have 10+ tabs open at all times even while gaming.
The minimum anomaly @ mid sets 32 is due to the allocation refresh time of each strobe. More columns and rows to charge discharge. You should also test 24 and 40 MB to discover parity between odds and include soe stats for budget gaps between standards.
several tests prove that both intel and AMD struggle to handle 4 dimms. When using 4 dimms, usually the frequency of all of them drop to the minimum, so if I were you, I would go with a 2x 48GB to have 96GB total, and still get high frequency. For example, 2x 48GB would run at 6000mhz while 4x 24GB would run at 4800 or lower (even though each dimm individually could go up to 6000 or more). If amount of RAM is more important to you than frequency speed, then go for 4 dimms, but if higher memory frequency matters, then try as much as possible to stay with 2 dimms to make sure you are getting the max frequency possible.
you should have tested different resolutions in order for this video to be accurate. At 1440p 16gb isnt enough in half the games i play, theres always 15.7 gb of the 16gb in use when i play more intense games while in 1080p, 16gb is plenty. Cool video idea, but i feel like its lacking information
Does bro know the games don’t only depend on ram ? Cuz if he had the same build the same CPU’s and gpus and power supply and type shi the fps would be way dif
futureproof, also in case some slot gets damaged this is nothing new, is preferable to use only two sticks of ram in any platform, ddr3, ddr4, only in the times of ddr2 was not problematic, sort of, and in that time dual channel was almost a myth lol
I don't know the difference between 2 x 16GB vs 4 x 8GB on B550, the only way I could get the DDR 3600Mhz Cl 14 stuff was in 8GB sticks made by Muskin Redline, they are paired with a 5700x also.
MY PC BUILT IS: RTX 4070 super 12GB MSI B760 Gaming Plus Motherboard Crucial Pro DDR5 16GB * 2 Crucial P5 plus 2TB Pcle Intel i9 14900K MSI Mag 850 W power supply Cooler Master Master liquid fans - 2 fans for top exhaust be quiet pure wings fan - 1 fan for front intake NZXT H5 Flow cabinet - comes with 1 rear exhaust and 1 front intake fan Dell S2721 DGF Monitor it will cost around 2.2 lakh INR
yall are testing ram but use a 7700xt which is 30+ percent faster than a 4060 which also makes a difference in fps so im not understanding your test results
I bought 2x32 Corsair vengeance...died after 3 months, won't run XMP, won't even run normal. It does 2120 15-15-15. Supposed to be 3200. I hate having to send stuff back.
Considering the year is nearly over and it's a relevant question going forward, I doubt it was a typo. Even if it was, nobody else has their knickers in a twist.
I routinely run 32gb in my desktops, my Z2 G4 will run 128gb, but that's a little much for what I do, I can get 64gb used here in the Philippines for about $85.
I wanna feel safe with 64GB of DDR5 I know its not needed but vrchat does eat up a lot of the ram and I like to have many programs open I do stream on twitch sometimes and would like the extra ram space since I know sometime in the future things will get more demanding.
I have 2x 8gb = 16gb. If i just remove one and add a 16gb for 24gb. Does that makes a difference? Or will it be an issue due to different ram capacity?
@@mzulhilmi4506 you can mix and match, but they Will operate att the slowest speed. It might cause issues so that’s why I always go the safe route and use the same ram sticks
what about MSFS-2024 memory requirement (actual), I'm ignoring what they suggest, I'd rather listen to you. I've got a z690, 12900K CPU & 4090 and have 32GB DDR5 G-Skill Trident Z5 RGB, 6000Mhz RAM (early release, so latency is pretty high, something like 32-32-32-16 (sorry, I know that's not right but it's in the range)) . I don't want to upgrade to 64GB unless it's absolutely necessary. Thank you in advance so so much!!!!!
I've been using a Rog Strix b760i with 1 fucked DIMM slot for almost a year now and have been wondering how much my 16gb would be boosted if the other DIMM slot worked lmao
gskill is top tier
I love g skill
TridentZ >>>
Yep. I've been using RipJaws RAM for at least 10 years. I have never had a problem with RipJaws and I've installed it in all my machines and in the machines of several builds I did for family, friends, and customers.
it dosent really matter what brand you use today because 95% off all RAM Chips are one of the 4 big player Micron, Samsing and Hynix. Also the memory training algorithms of you memory controller are way better as it was at DDR2 and DDR3 as it was introduced the first time. But as long your Manufacturer of that Stick doesn't screwed up with the PCB and their Configuration controller aka SPD = Serial Presence Detect, this tells your System everything that is needed to work properly and based on this information RAM testing and training works its magic and may or may not improve things.
i have never tested if this does something but is annoying anyway waiting 10min for 64gb ram and i personally run RAM on JEDAC settings because of stability under constant High bandwidth. I do work with my PC for the most time, and sometimes it runs a singular workload at 90% CPU and constantly accessing 20gb to 58gb RAM.
XMP sucks if you do that type of workload, even your program could run faster but utilizing 30 threads at one with a 4 times overprovisioning, because disk IO times therefore reducing CPU idle time, this means i run about 120 threads at once. Sometimes over Days.
but back to the RAM it self. Cheaper brands using the same chips so the quality on RAM is the same, But temperature managing or signal integrity can be a problem on them especial on those RGB junk. In fact RGB slows your system down, for 2 reasons. 1. CPU usage, you have to actively write to a certain memory address on the RAM. 2. Rank blocking, you can only read or write to the ram if your rank you try to access is available and only one task per cycle has access. Rank interliving is the reason why 4 sticks are slower as 2 stick on a dual channel system, also the bandwidth stays the same. But this isn't fully true, it depends on if you use Single Rank or Dual Rank RAM. Your Memory controller can access 1/2/4 ranks per channel. The reason is address bus bit size. Usually DDR4 is 65bit wide bus, but some Single ranks use a 128bit wide address bus those are double-sided, there are perfect for big files. In this case, only 1 task can access the RAM per channel. if you have a Single Sided RAM this doesn't change even with a second stick, the reason is both using the same data lines.
Dual rank RAM is the most common type and uses both sides of a Channel, therefore your memory controller can access both Ranks at the same time. If your Memory controler supports this you could use 4 Rank modules, but this cuts your data lines in half. the Benefits of this is you can have 4 tasks access the RAM at the same time bit the data chunks are half in size as well. This is perfect for databases who handle small 1kb or less files.
Your memory controller has a limitation of how many ranks are addressable in one channel, but this doesn't change the bandwidth, only the potential Capacity and the performance depending on your workload. The numbers of Channels on the other hand increases the bandwidth and how many tasks can access at the same time, but more channels means more space is needed for your RAM controller on your CPU and this doesn't scale well, that is why consumer PC have only 2 Channels and 4 Ranks per Channel (2 slots per Channel). but you can access only one slot per channel, therefore your system constantly switching between slots, the faster you update your pretty RGB, the less possibility has your program to access your RAM and your CPU decides holding your thread in one core for processing and fewer cores are now available for your program as well.
In the end, the slower your whole system is, the more impact on performance it has.
i love my gskill 2 Flare X5 DDR5-6000
Minimum 128gb cant even open 500 chrome tabs
I can open 500 edge tabs with 16gb easily
@@Gargentwitchongargee yea edge doesn't load any tabs unless you click on them so it's like having none until you press it
@@Gargentwitchongargeebut its edge tho. Chrome tabs are the real benchmark
Can you even get two 64GB sticks on RAM? 32GB is plenty.
@@BREEZYM6015 yes you can i think so
32 for ddr4 is kinda my recommendation
Yup! That's what I have right now and it's fine.
@@Aggressive_SploogeI have 16gb ddr4 and it’s good
@@Potential2006I mean, for 2006 it's amazing. But there are a couple that break into 32 gb
@@JBrinx18 yh
That's enough for 273 open tabs and running a video export while playing Cyberpunk at 1440p high refresh.
I got 32GB as it was cheap and I don’t want to think about it anymore.
^^^This^^^
32gb of DDR4 is under $50.
32gb of DDR5 is under $90.
I literally just purchased 32 gigs of RAM for my DDR5 right now because of this lol
Same here, got 32gb DDR4 for 60 euro's (3600mhz)
It’s what I got and I don’t feel like it’s enough with 3070 8Gb when I have tabs open like TH-cam videos on my other monitor my game I’m playing stutters so bad
omg I feel this
Pretty insane that we need 32 GB now just to have discord and a game running. And it's for sure 32 GB minimum because modern games will just get more demanding from here.
Ddr6 will come out before we start needing more than 32gb ram
that's not true at all, I'm still running an absolute potato with ddr3 8gb on windows10. and I can easily run discord, 3 or more chrome tabs and pretty much any game you would want to run. and my PC still runs as normal
Jedi Survivor and my Game Launchers eat 20 GBs of RAM i wanna see it on your 8 GB machine😂@@Nitrecz
@@julienmarschall7518 okay, well that's really weird. because I've quite literally had AAA games open in the background and several chrome tabs open plus discord. and my PC runs absolutely fine. but with that being said, actually trying to run those AAA games in question at ultra settings would probably result in an explosion. but having them open in the background like the OP mentioned, my PC could handle without any problems
@@Nitrecz.....fallout 76? Cyberpunk? City skylines 2? Ehh i dont think so
you did this test wrong fo a couple of reason. 1. different gpus with different amounts of vram. A video card with 8gb will offload more to the system ram than a 12gb card will. Shouldve used the exact same card in the systems 1a. You used different brands of gpu. Nvidia and AMD cards work completely differently to each other in regards to how their specific type of ram works while using dlss or the amd equivelant. 2. you didnt mention if you used dlss/ray tracing or not. 3. what speed was the ddr4 and ddr5? top speed ddr4 will outform low speed ddr5. 6. What timings and frequencies where was the ram running at?
They made it clear they weren’t comparing the DDR4 to the DDR5. So all DDR4 comparisons were on the same rig as each other and all DDR5 comparisons were on the same rig as each other. What’s the issue?
@@jeffleecust Basic scientific method rules. You don't want more than one variable that would affect the testing of your theory/question. Especially with PCs you'd want the highest GPU possible to prevent any limitations. Honestly Im surprised @cameronliddell9533 didnt mention not using Intel Cpus due to their ability to use both DDR4 & 5 for the same reasons prior.
Yes, was honestly just disappointed that the card I’m planning on getting, the 4060, wasn’t even tested with ddr5.
@@jeffleecustI know but I was still confused and thought they were so I’m like u get an extra 100 fps I forgot thy said that
Don't get 4060@@Pyro.ae1
you probably should've used the same gpu on each system so that there isn't any confusion for the ppl who don't necessarily understand what to look for, and at the same time you'd be showing the benefit of going with a newer platform.
it would eliminate variables, which is always good.
@@buildyourcomputer For sure, and also one GPU has 8GB Vram while the other has 12GB, which can heavily influence 1%, .1% lows from what ive seen, often more than the amount of system Ram
I agree with this, its not really a fair comparison when most everything is completely different. Or at least use an RX7600 since its most comparable to the 4060.
Yeah the comparison makes absolutely no sense if your aren't using the same hardware.
Thank you for saving my time, I was a minute in when I came across your comment and I’m so glad I did 💀🤝🏻
Props to your sponsor when I was building G skill 0:51 was the best value. And those Trident memory sticks were fast as could be. ❤
Just took my gaming PC from 32 to 64GB. Because I wanted to. Have yet to find a single use for the extra memory, other than just being cool to have more RAM than I've ever had before.
classic example of bigger is not better if you dont know how to use it lmao😂😉
Have fun
I just wanted to fill all 4 ram slots in my new pc since it looks better 😂
@@Sweetguy1821 filling all the slots can slow down your memory. It's best to use the two slots listed in the manual. They even sell dummy sticks you can use to fill the slots for aesthetics.
Try looking into Virtual Machines
Try flight simulator in VR. 32 it nothing
I just built a PC with 64gb of RAM and with all of the games I've tested the PC is only using about 20% of that at peak usage. The GPU is getting a lot more utilization.
This makes 32gb a good option
Depends heavily on games you play, me personally I am playing a old MMO where multiboxing is allowed and run the game with several instances (daily 6 at once and a couple of times a week with 30+ clients) using up around 70% of my RAM usage along with my 5950X almost maxed out.
beamng pretty much eats through my 16gb at the moment. Around ~13ish usage.
@@lucas_m1740usually in idle computer uses around 3gb of ram. It only uses 13gb cuz that’s the amount left for it to use :) I had the same thing happen to me until I added another 16gb
My pc is w10 and running with ~6 gb ram usage during idle. I count steam app open as idle
16GB minimum, 32GB is nice to have, 64GB or more if you are running NASA models and have a supercomputer. I run 16GB in my HTPC and 32GB in my 2 other machines. Most of the games I play are older anyways, new games kinda universally suck. lol
Cyberpunk is the only "new" game I play. I have hopes for Space Marine 2 (can't afford it yet).
Otherwise, Warhammer 2, Rome 2, and the like for me.
@@hawkeye7527 And It's released 4 years ago, BMW is the only decent new games
Didn't watch the video? Typically. 16gb doesn't work well if you have discord open, share ur screen, have more than 1 monitor, have open internet tabs or anything. Just diagnosed a pc with stuttering during tarkov and Microsoft flight sim. The cause. 16gb of ram and discord open while playing. 32gb is minimum for gaming now.
My Warzone running 32g ddr5 6000mhz, 20000mb, 4k OLED 65" 120hz + Windows11 and more.
16 gb rn is not minimum lol
Staying with ddr4 for a few more years :)
Because everything I play runs perfectly with ddr4, and it's the same with my 4060 card, it can run everything I play perfectly and at max.
I'm also not one of those people who just change because something is better, when what I have now just runs well :)
But there are always some crazy people who want the newest and fastest all the time, so they can show a go score to their friends
and brag a bit about the fact that they have now wasted a lot of money on something they absolutely DO NOT need
at least you said everything you play and not 'it runs every game at 4k max settings at 120+ fps'
Yup, I love PC gaming as much as the next guy, but I love sticking with my hardware for as long as I can.
I’m running in 6gb of vram and it’s still useable in 2024
Also, I never really understood the people who are constantly upgrading to the latest part the second they’re announced
I have the same and it does everything I need and more
I like my games to run good and also look good so I spend more lol 32gb of fast ddr5 with my rtx4070 super TI is perfect for me 🤷♂️ I gotta have max settings everytime
Agreed..
I will stick with my trusty old i9-9900k and 32Gb DDR4@3200MHz.. Only upgrade I have made for years, is a change from a ROG STRIX 2070 to an ASUS TUF 4060Ti
As long as I can play the games I play (Destiny 2, Warframe, Diablo 4, Helldivers 2 and BF2042) at high to ultra settings and still get 60+ fps I am not changing..
I'm honestly really happy with 64GB. It lets me keep my chrome tabs open and play games at the same time. It also lets me run virtual machines while doing other things.
Thissss!!!
I have 64gb too but I still close everything to play games. I guess im old fashioned 😂
@@Alienvisitor007 😄🤣😂 guess it's time to move to 128gb
@Alienvisitor007 Same here. After years of struggling on a low end stock PC. 😂
I've got a dual kit of 32 Gb Corsair Vengeance @6000 MHz DDR5 RGB in my main PC, and it's been very solid. I originally only had 16 GB of T-FORCE Vulcan @6000 MHz, but I decided to upgrade just because I had the extra money and I'm glad I did. I have used 16 GB for a past system @2666 Speeds, and it was terrible. so, the jump from 2666 to 6000 MHz dual channel was quite noticeable. like I mean... REALLY noticeable. love this kit of 6000 MHz ram from corsair so much.
For fortnite specifically you can enable replays that capture the game and avoid run to run variance by benchmarking the replay, if you go to career and then replays you can just play the same game over and over.
For gaming 32 GB is a Great start - for astro photography - 132 to 256 or 512 GB is fairly common. Your hobbies determine your needs - and if your gear has his much capability - you can do a lot more than simply play games. Modern GPUs with their abundance of CUDA cores can really streamline tasks that take a while. Sharpening a 73MB image of a nebula takes 16 minutes on my 36 core dual Xeon workstation - but when I used GPU rather than CPU based CUDA this task on my RTX 4070 shrinks to a minute!
As long as your total system usage is less than your total ram capacity, there is zero benefit to having more ram. The thing that really matters is Frequency and timings.
True.
This is why scraping your way onto AM5 is a bad idea. You end up with cheap DDR5 that performs worse than some average DDR4.
@@Lurch-Bot Can you elaborate? might help me to decide between 12400f(dead LGA1700) build or 7500f (AM5)
@@yudi8204 AM5 is the only way to go if you want any longevity and an upgrade path.
@@Lurch-Bot unless you get a bundle from microcenter ofc.
Each to their own but when 16 gig was the standard I started buying 32 gigs. When I noticed that some games with a few things running in the background started taking 22-25 gigs I moved to 64 gigs and have been there since the 9900k lol
32 is becoming the normal and I plan on keeping my 4080 laptop for quite a few years, so I went from 16 to 48. Couldn’t quite justify 64
I'm using 64GB ClL28 5600 (32X2) on a 7800X3d . I use 24GB for the Primocache game drive, and the rest available for the system/games. Primocache is being used to accelerate access times/load times for maximum performance, 5600 Cl28 is basically = to 6000 CL30 (10ms) latency for both.
I went from 32 GB to 4 sticks 64 GB purely for looks. It was worth it. Have had no stability issues on a asrock x670e lightning and 7950x
Great video guys as usual great to see this video on a nice slow sunday
In reality, unless you're doing content creation like 3D rendering (DAZ Studio) image editing, (Adobe Photoshop) video editing, (DivVinci Resolve), or 3D model creation, (Unreal Engine) you only need 16GB of RAM. It's always wise to check the RECOMMENDED specs of your games and not the REQUIRED specs of your games. A GOOD graphics card is your greatest ally when it comes to FPS performance, not RAM.
Actually a good CPU is your ally for high FPS, but try again.
@@brucevandermescht6957 Unless the CPU has the GPU built in, (Intel Inegrated Graphics, for instance) you're absolutely wrong. If your GPU is handling the graphics processing, (that's why it's called a GPU) then that task is left to the GPU, not the CPU.
2 x 32 gig corsair vengence 6400mhz Wd blackseriea 4tb 850x hd 4090 I7 13700k runs absolutely mint
Doesnt wallpaper engine turn off once you launch a fullscreen application though? shouldnt effect anything.
The amount of ram you NEED varies greatly on what your doing. Starfield for example will run with 16gb but of course runs better with 32gb. The Starfield Creation Kit however REQUIRES 32gb and recommends 48gb or higher. When building a PC or buying a pre made one find out how many slots you have and your maximum potential of your board and CPU. That way You have a future upgrade path that way no matter what you choose.
Is the shop open for the public? Ive been watching the videos for awhile now but just realized that you all are right across the bridge. Keep up the good work and great videos
Yes! Google PCBros for hours and address
its a shop you visit to buy pcs, in the night is visited by thieves, as reported months before
32gb is the best bet to avoid those really big 0.1% stutters right now, plus a potential 1% lows improvement.
going to 32 is going to help my GTX card out a lot. going from 140 to 180 may not be a lot for you but for me, someone who is experiencing stuttering it will smooth everything out. I struggle to maintain 75fps cause my lows are looooow. Rams in the mail. next upgrade will be GPU
and here i am going in to 2025 with my Ryzen 5 2600 48GB DDR4 with Radeon RX 590 8GB why do i still feel so cool sorry i am OK
Been running 64GB (3600), with 16 core on AM4 since Jan 2020.
I don’t wish to be a downer but shouldn’t you have used a cpu that can use both ddr4 and ddr5?
They’re not comparing the two systems to each other. They’re citing two examples of three different sizes of RAM for each.
Do your own test and post the video.
CPU architecture to CPR architecture uses ram different ram is different. I’m saying remove all the variables.
I see it kind of like you’re putting premium into one car and regular unleaded into another of two different sized engines.
The video is not comparing DDR4 vs DDR5, it’s how much you need for each platform independently.
We do have plans to make a video discussing if DDR5 is worth it, but honestly all new platforms will have DDR5 only soon so it really isn’t a choice anymore
Also with your car analogy , we are not racing those two cars against each other ;)
But they would still need to change motherboards anyway. DDR5 does not fit in DDR4 slots.
I wish you would’ve matched the timings on all your ram kits…
the goal was show how well it does the more ram you have, not how well it does the timings you want, keep in mind that most people never touch timigs to avoid stability problems, it is wasted time to play with those settings for hours and discover days later the pc is still unstable but you were sure it was
You tell about AM4 for gamming in 2025? Seriously? AM4 was released in 2016, AM5 in 2022. I will of course be playing on my Core 2 Duo in 2025, but there are builds for 2K on ultra settings.
Depend on resolution & how heavy the in-game world building.
The bigger the screen, bigger the world, bigger texture = More ram.
Yes!i have ddr5 6000mhz, 4k oled 65" COD Warzone need 17000-20000mb. Plus windows 11 and another programs.
i think you guys should benchmark Tarkov with ram specific benchmarks. that game benefits massively from certain configurations of ram.
I have 32GB trident g skill z5 neo rgb and my PC is fully optimized by the founder of FPSHub and they told me going to either 4 sticks or even 2 stick of total 64GB would be to much and more then likely slow me down cause I’d never utilize that much ram
Do the amount of dimms matter??? I was thinking of getting the recommended ram for my new AMD Ryzen 9800X3D that is going on my new AsRock X780E motherboard, but unfortunately it only comes in 2 dimms of 16GB for a total of 32GB. I need at least 42GB for Star Citizen for it to play well. So I was thinking of getting two packs, which would be 64GB over 4 dimms of G.skills Royal 6000 28 latency. Should that be okay??? Or should I find a different ram kit that has 2 dimms of 32gb for a total of 64gb???? Thank you for you time and I will like and subscribe
several tests prove that both intel and AMD struggle to handle 4 dimms. When using 4 dimms, usually the frequency of all of them drop to the minimum, so if I were you, I would go with a 2x 32GB to have 64GB total, and still get high frequency. For example, 2x 32GB would run at 5600mhz while 4x 16GB would run at 4800 or lower (even though each dimm individually could go up to 6000 or more). If amount of RAM is more important to you than frequency speed, then go for 4 dimms, but if higher memory frequency matters, then try as much as possible to stay with 2 dimms to make sure you are getting the max frequency possible.
@ yeah, I did further research and I since I purchased a 9800X3D, Asrock Taichi X870E, I ended up going with the AMD recommended 2 dimm set of G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5 6000 (2x32) for a total of 64gb. The reason I went with 64gb instead of 32gb, is that watching a reviewer I trust showed that for Star Citizen (the game I play the most), you need a minimum of 42gb of ram to get higher stable frame rates. I also play a lot of Helldivers 2, which only needs 32gb, but Star Citizen is my focus. Thank you very much for the information, I really appreciate you taking time out of your day to get back to me.
I can’t play on full details on warzone with 32gb ram it’s us 87% of my ram game turned off straight away
Im using i9 13900k and GeForce 4070ti super by the way
I'm curious, why did you guys chose not to have the same amount of ram minimum and maximum? With ddr4 you went as low as 16gb and with ddr5 you went as high as 64gb.
Between 16 and 32. The first as a minimum and the second for future proofing. Have 4x8 Gb G-Skill Tridentz 3600 C16 and they're quality. But I don't like that you can't disable RGB forever in BIOS.
I'm unable to find 2x32GB of DDR5. Will 2 Kits of 2x16GB DDR5 @ 6000MHz work? Looking at Corsair Dominator Titanium's.
The 16Gb sticks being dual module is the difference here meaning those sticks have 8Gb of ram on both sides to make up one 16Gb stick which is always going to run slightly faster than a single module 8Gb stick either way ALWAYS making sure to run them in dual channel mode as well makes a difference.
I initially had 16gig(2x8) then after few months I added two more sticks of the same brand so now it's 32gig (4x8). Pc feels to run much smoother, less hiccups lol and I can remain few apps open while gaming. You can't go wrong with adding more ram to your pc.
You should dive into the difference in performance between different memory dies! we! love! HYNIX!
Plan on getting a rtx 5090 custom desktop from Origin.
Think will go with 64gb or more for future proofing.
If do 64gb is best to do 32gb x2 or 16gb x4.?
What about 24gb ddr5? I just bought a new gaming laptop with the rx 7700s and dual channel 16gb ddr5 ram. Im planning on replacing one of the 8gb sticks for a 16gb for a total oh 24gb at 4800mhz. Is it a good idea to go with this config? Also another question. By having different ram sizes would it affect the dual channel functionality or it wouldn't affect it at all?
Im building a pc with ryzen7 7800x3d with a 4090 but dont know if 32gb of ram is good or to go with 64gb of ram any recommendations?
32gb RAM here. I have a very modest system, but Diablo 4 was consuming outrageous amount of RAM (22GB) RAM is cheap - it's the most logical way to update your system
I may have missed it but are you using the same cas latency on all the ddr4 16, 32 and 64 and same with the ddr5?
So is Ram fixing stuttering? i play on a i7 7700k (4,9ghz oc) and a 1080gtx. I tweaked the shit out of my computer and the game. I get +230 fps but got bad stutters to 60 fps randomly.
Game is not enjoyable
would 64gb 16x4 6000mhz cl30 with expo enabled work properly? paired with ryzen 7600 and msi b650 tomahawk
question and I don't want to sound dumb but will you get better performance with ray tracing with ddr5 ram
I upgraded a year ago from 16GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16 to 32GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16. Since I upgraded my cpu 1-2 months ago from ryzen 5 1600 AF to ryzen 5 5500, now I can run quad channel xmp. I have 4 kingston fury beast 8GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16.
Dual rank ram isnt quad channel but some say it is.
Hi so I just upgraded my old shit box I uypower from 8 gb ram to 48gb. Found some good cheap ram on sale ddr4 b360mb. I was wondering actually it’s running at 2133 lowest speeds. How do I get them to run at a higher speed. Is there a way to do this any help is appreciated thanks
Question: does DDR-5 work in a AM4 system like B550? Thanks
What if you get fast 2x16gb pair now for 32gb of ram and if need be get another of the same pair later on, would the cpu have a problem running the same speeds on 4 sticks? Cause ppl say that amd cpu having that issue.
Am using 16+8 gb DDR5 ram. What is actual result 24 or 16. Both same speed (4800)
I already have 2x Trident Z5 Neo RGB
DDR5-6000 CL32 38 38 96 1.35V AMD EXPO, does it work with intel motherboard MSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI, Socket 1700, ATX, Wi-Fi ? I dont want to overclock anything, just need to know, are they compatible ?
Is your board DDR5?
That will answer your question.
✌️😎
@@Jeff.78 Thank you for your answer. Yes, it supports DDR5 and sorry if it was a silly question, i have very little knowledge about PC components.
We recommend 32gb ddr4 and ddr5 are perfectly a lot of triple a titles and competitive games without micro shutters.
What CPU cooler is that?
Love my G.skil Trident Z rgb ram. 32gb DDR5 6400mhz kit, ran perfect right out of the box on xmp
None those Corsair shenanigans where they sell you PC4800 to overclock.
was this in dual channel or quad?
I think 7000 series only support Dual or single Channel.
i have 16gb ddr4 in 2 laptops, 32gb ddr4 in a 3rd laptop, 32gb ddr4 in 1 desktop and 64gb ddr5 in the 2nd desktop. only 1 of the 16gb laptops isnt for gaming and is super old but i still use it for watching videos and surfing the web (all its good for anymore). i tend to have 10+ tabs open at all times even while gaming.
My question would be should I buy bigger ram starting 2 dim 2 channel or add 2 extra sticks
The minimum anomaly @ mid sets 32 is due to the allocation refresh time of each strobe. More columns and rows to charge discharge. You should also test 24 and 40 MB to discover parity between odds and include soe stats for budget gaps between standards.
99% of everyone who reads this has no idea what you're talking about, myself incuded.
I'm sorry they feel that way.@@Jeff.78
If my pc has 16GB can I get a 32GB kit and use them together?
If you have low vram gpu like rtx 2060 6gb, then 32gb is safe choice (mine dropped vram usage from 5.2 gb to 4.5)
Currently have 32gb 4800mhz on a 13900kf and rtx 4090. Thinking of upgrading to 96gb of 5600mhz. Would I be better off getting that in 4 sticks or 2?
2
several tests prove that both intel and AMD struggle to handle 4 dimms. When using 4 dimms, usually the frequency of all of them drop to the minimum, so if I were you, I would go with a 2x 48GB to have 96GB total, and still get high frequency. For example, 2x 48GB would run at 6000mhz while 4x 24GB would run at 4800 or lower (even though each dimm individually could go up to 6000 or more). If amount of RAM is more important to you than frequency speed, then go for 4 dimms, but if higher memory frequency matters, then try as much as possible to stay with 2 dimms to make sure you are getting the max frequency possible.
The faces Jackson makes when Matt is talking are funny 😂
Seeing the min fps in black myth wukong is the main reason why 48gb is the reccomended ammount of ram in 2025 for me.
What cooler is that big white block
Deepcool assassin 4
Are there differences when you use 2 sticks vs 4 sticks?
yes, the latency increases a bit, is preferable to have ony 2 sticks, less power used also, but is not a big performance loss, like 50% or less
you should have tested different resolutions in order for this video to be accurate. At 1440p 16gb isnt enough in half the games i play, theres always 15.7 gb of the 16gb in use when i play more intense games while in 1080p, 16gb is plenty. Cool video idea, but i feel like its lacking information
Why does the title say 2025
Does bro know the games don’t only depend on ram ? Cuz if he had the same build the same CPU’s and gpus and power supply and type shi the fps would be way dif
In fortnite you can use replay mode to test the frames in the same scenario
Is the RAM important for playing VR?
So is it RAM or REEM?
BO6 has a benchmark tool, I'm surprised they haven't implemented it in Warzone.
I'm still confused why manufacturers put 4 slots on ddr5 since it's not stable with 4 dimms
futureproof, also in case some slot gets damaged
this is nothing new, is preferable to use only two sticks of ram in any platform, ddr3, ddr4, only in the times of ddr2 was not problematic, sort of, and in that time dual channel was almost a myth lol
Îs this with dlss on? Or just normal?
I don't know the difference between 2 x 16GB vs 4 x 8GB on B550, the only way I could get the DDR 3600Mhz Cl 14 stuff was in 8GB sticks made by Muskin Redline, they are paired with a 5700x also.
MY PC BUILT IS:
RTX 4070 super 12GB
MSI B760 Gaming Plus Motherboard
Crucial Pro DDR5 16GB * 2
Crucial P5 plus 2TB Pcle
Intel i9 14900K
MSI Mag 850 W power supply
Cooler Master Master liquid fans - 2 fans for top exhaust
be quiet pure wings fan - 1 fan for front intake
NZXT H5 Flow cabinet - comes with 1 rear exhaust and 1 front intake fan
Dell S2721 DGF Monitor
it will cost around 2.2 lakh INR
yall are testing ram but use a 7700xt which is 30+ percent faster than a 4060 which also makes a difference in fps so im not understanding your test results
I bought 2x32 Corsair vengeance...died after 3 months, won't run XMP, won't even run normal. It does 2120 15-15-15. Supposed to be 3200. I hate having to send stuff back.
Thanks for saving me money! 💰 I had Corsair vengeance in my Amazon cart. Going to go with a different brand.
(2025)
Yeah, I definitely trust a guy who deliberately type a wrong year in his video's title.
Considering the year is nearly over and it's a relevant question going forward, I doubt it was a typo. Even if it was, nobody else has their knickers in a twist.
I routinely run 32gb in my desktops, my Z2 G4 will run 128gb, but that's a little much for what I do, I can get 64gb used here in the Philippines for about $85.
I didn't expect a video drop on Sunday. Well 32 GB's of RAM for DDR4 or DDR5.
I wanna feel safe with 64GB of DDR5 I know its not needed but vrchat does eat up a lot of the ram and I like to have many programs open I do stream on twitch sometimes and would like the extra ram space since I know sometime in the future things will get more demanding.
Nothing wrong with feeling safe
How much MHZ are the Rams ?
I have 2x 8gb = 16gb. If i just remove one and add a 16gb for 24gb. Does that makes a difference? Or will it be an issue due to different ram capacity?
dont do that, only use pairs that you bought together
@FJ1903 noted. Same brand. But can a 24gb ram cause any issue? Or should should we just follow same speed and capacity as well?
@@mzulhilmi4506 you can mix and match, but they Will operate att the slowest speed. It might cause issues so that’s why I always go the safe route and use the same ram sticks
I got currently 32gb 6000mghz ddrr5 CL38. But when I build a new pc with the soon 5090 Im going with 64GB ddr5.
Comparing systems the spec should be as identical as possible, specifically the RTX 4060 against itself in the newer system.
what about MSFS-2024 memory requirement (actual), I'm ignoring what they suggest, I'd rather listen to you. I've got a z690, 12900K CPU & 4090 and have 32GB DDR5 G-Skill Trident Z5 RGB, 6000Mhz RAM (early release, so latency is pretty high, something like 32-32-32-16 (sorry, I know that's not right but it's in the range)) . I don't want to upgrade to 64GB unless it's absolutely necessary. Thank you in advance so so much!!!!!
Isn't the 4060 bottlenecking the system on ddr4? Even if you used the best ram the gpu cant handle it
I'm just playing through Pokémon Crystal again, but that's cool.
Depends… speed, type of RAM, how much RAM, how many sticks you’re using, what games you’re playing, etc…
How much for tetris and drink beer simulator?
@@zetahalo8GB😂
2666mhz?
What's the point of trying to play 300+ fps if your monitor isn't 300hz+
I've been using a Rog Strix b760i with 1 fucked DIMM slot for almost a year now and have been wondering how much my 16gb would be boosted if the other DIMM slot worked lmao