What's next for the European Green Deal? | Counting the Cost

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @TAL142
    @TAL142 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    This green deal was supposed to make money off developing countries especially against China. In other words, you pay for your industrialization to make products to sell to US/Europe. And then US/Europe will charge you green taxes or have to buy their green technology. But when Europe is less green than China. Most of the profit would have gone to China instead.

    • @lluow
      @lluow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They’ve always wanted China to shoulder the most of burden. They don’t want to lower their living standards and their politicians can’t order their citizens to save the planet so they rely on “authoritarian” China to do the “dirty work” for them. And then they will turn around accusing China of being undemocratic and violating human rights. How ironic.

    • @aaabbb-py5xd
      @aaabbb-py5xd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah the "free world" and its "leadership", not to mention their fake "woke" movement, designed to recruit minorities to serve interests foreign to themselves.

  • @christinebell37
    @christinebell37 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Boot out the likes of UVL

  • @angeladipace1035
    @angeladipace1035 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This green deal is a sham and a shame. Von der layen to be absolutely changed. I hope the protest with tractors goes on for days

  • @ruthcollins2841
    @ruthcollins2841 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Zero on all green ideologies! Postpone for 100 years until technology is properly in place. 👎😡😠

  • @rosanaramirez4615
    @rosanaramirez4615 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People will always pay for government spending. It doesn’t matter how you want to present it, or hide it.

  • @daniellee8720
    @daniellee8720 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Von Der Leyen, its in tatters!!! 😂😂

    • @christinebell37
      @christinebell37 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      About time! May she get booted out

  • @rosanaramirez4615
    @rosanaramirez4615 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People will always pay for government spending. It doesn’t matter how you want to present it, or hide it. The “State” stimulating…that’s with taxpayer money. It is insulting how this lady at the beginning things people can’t think.

  • @Avatar_2025
    @Avatar_2025 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is not a green deal until we start relooking into Stan Meyers' car that ran on water or Bruce DePalma's generator, or Searl's effect Generator.

    • @nomadiclapse
      @nomadiclapse 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fresh water is a precious resource... you might want to think a little deeper mr. free energy. Stan's VW didn't run on saltwater

    • @dr-rexmangrca113
      @dr-rexmangrca113 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nomadiclapsethere more fresh drinking water than you think.. The elelistes4 and zionizts are pushing agendas.. For control... Like the killer covrid19... Which have been here for very like long time... Of bird flu in ccp China last 22 year.. Only killing 50 humans

  • @oceanwave4502
    @oceanwave4502 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The Green deal, in my opinion, leads to large scaled deindustrialization, the collapse of algriculture industry. Without jobs, without food, say good luck to prosperity in the long term future.

    • @ssuwandi3240
      @ssuwandi3240 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Foods redistribution for sure

    • @unreliablenarrator6649
      @unreliablenarrator6649 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China has proven this wrong. In fact, it is so successful at implementing clean energy and new energy vehicles of every type, the US and EU are resorting to trade barriers too lock then out of markets while the continue to talk about leadership while doing nothing, Let's face it, the US & EU failed to execute until it was too late to compete on a level playing field. The cut their own legs off with bureaucracy.

  • @rosanaramirez4615
    @rosanaramirez4615 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    State support=people’s money

  • @tornado-s-2012
    @tornado-s-2012 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1945: E. Fermi, “The country which first develops a breeder reactor will have a great competitive advantage in atomic energy.” - Russian Rosatom did it this year. EU - Cope harder and collect woods.

    • @nomadiclapse
      @nomadiclapse 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Breeder reactors are used to create depleted uranium munitions and toxic waste.... the thorium cycle has been proven since the mid 1950's but isn't used for that very reason.

  • @jakel8627
    @jakel8627 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Planets screwed LMAO. Let's go Rio de Janeiro 🇧🇷

    • @BobQuigley
      @BobQuigley 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ,maybe check if there's room for you?? Unprecedented climate catastrophes have done $billions in damages to Brazil just a week or two ago. Hundreds of thousands of citizens are on the move due to the flooding.

    • @saldussapnai3464
      @saldussapnai3464 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Brazil cude take care of amazone way more❤

    • @Christambassadors-2023
      @Christambassadors-2023 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😅❤

    • @kongwee1978
      @kongwee1978 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China is selling affordable solar, wind to 88% non western world.

  • @maftab3818
    @maftab3818 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    China Russia is good ❤❤❤

    • @tornado-s-2012
      @tornado-s-2012 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      спасибо, друг