Unfortunately, the only way Boeing see's the 797 make it to market is as a rebranded Comac 919, that is, once Comac buys the controlling interest in Boeing.
Believe it when i see it, can you imagine the delays with Boeing getting a brand new aircraft into the air, would be at least 10 years from now, in the meantime Airbus gaining more market share.
They should probably be more concerned to investigate, reduce and resolve the existing quality problems. However I think it might be too late for Boeing to restore the confidence in their products.
Actually, remember AA’s “more legroom in coach” thing in the 2000’s? It did NOTHING for ticket sales. You’re WRONG. Passenger comfort is NOT something people consider when shopping for airfares. Even with AA having an extra 3” of legroom in coach, people STILL went with the cheapest tickets, not caring that AA was more comfortable.
Boeing miscalculate the market since 1985 when the Airbus A320 introduction. The Airbus A32X have wider seats and aisle. Airbus RULES the narrowbody. The 797 will NOT be a game changer as the A320. Boeing lost when they canceled the 757/767.
They stopped the 797 program as they lost too much time, if they went ahead 5-7 years ago this new airplane would have been old tech akready soon. Now they can wait for the newest developments especially regarding engines. However it woukd have been very smart to launch a 767X as a stop gap. This would have been a comparably simple upgrade. Engines already exist (the GEnx-2b), wingbox+gear supporting the larger engines already exists (767-400) and a modern cockpit and avionics already exist as well on the 767 (tanker). One version sized between the 767-200 and 767-300 and one sized between the 767-300 and 767-400 would have been perfect.
BOEING should better focus on safety standart and remove internal problems first like drug and alcohol problems by some of theyr employees. So why focus on 797 when 787 can do it even better? What about the huge issues with 777XXL?
Some Idiots seating on the BOEING Board, there's a B787- 10, B787 -9, B787 -8, therefore all that needs to accomplish this feat is a BOEING 787 -7 & B787-6 & WALLA
The 797 will rely on the next generation of engines not only to fly but also to increase efficiency. As we know, the latest engines are responsible for most of the efficiency gains. I am sure that whatever Boeing may come up with, Airbus will be in a position to re-engine any member of the 320 series.and apply whatever is needed to the airframe to commpete
Put a dress and high-heels on a 787.... and VOILA! You have a "797". You'll also get a new paint job. Don't ask us for quality, be happy with the new paint job we gave you.
A 797 should not be expected before 2025-2028. Considering that the final model of the 747, the 747-8 did not start deliveries until 2011 and that the 737 MAX 9 deliveries only started in 2018, we may not see a need for a 797 until well after even that date. How will Boeing name their planes after 797?Dec 30, 2023
Boeing "797"... more likely a *red herring* to see how Airbus and previous Boeing buyers react. Probably no more than a concept and some designs & detailed renderings at the moment. Let's see if Boeing can get the 797 off the ground. Pun intended.
Boeing is only 20 years too late on that plane. At this point, Boeing may not have the knowhow to build a new plane. Boeing is nothing but a shadow of the great company it once was.
There is no such plane in the works and Boeing has repeatedly said definitively no new planes before 2035
Click bait is all this is.
I don't think that Airbus has a single reason to be afraid of anything from Boeing.Probably the opposite way.
thanks for sharing your thoughts
Unfortunately, the only way Boeing see's the 797 make it to market is as a rebranded Comac 919, that is, once Comac buys the controlling interest in Boeing.
🥲🥲🥲
Believe it when i see it, can you imagine the delays with Boeing getting a brand new aircraft into the air, would be at least 10 years from now, in the meantime Airbus gaining more market share.
yep thanks for your sharing
They should probably be more concerned to investigate, reduce and resolve the existing quality problems. However I think it might be too late for Boeing to restore the confidence in their products.
797 Game changing??? More like "the only way Boeing survives". Revolutionize passenger comfort??? What BS.
It will never happen. At least not 10 years ahead
Boeing is the 2nd largest weapons manufacturer in the world and 1 of 3 airliner companies in the world. The IS government will not let it fail
@@beesung2052 yep
Actually, remember AA’s “more legroom in coach” thing in the 2000’s? It did NOTHING for ticket sales. You’re WRONG. Passenger comfort is NOT something people consider when shopping for airfares. Even with AA having an extra 3” of legroom in coach, people STILL went with the cheapest tickets, not caring that AA was more comfortable.
@@beesung2052what is IS government ?!?!
Boeing miscalculate the market since 1985 when the Airbus A320 introduction. The Airbus A32X have wider seats and aisle. Airbus RULES the narrowbody.
The 797 will NOT be a game changer as the A320. Boeing lost when they canceled the 757/767.
Is 787 for medium destinations? I thought it was for long distance meals
10 years late...AirBus will rull in the next 20 years 🍻🇵🇹
Less than that I would imagine
someone else said that the 797 will be the final nail in the coffin for boeing and i totally agree
They stopped the 797 program as they lost too much time, if they went ahead 5-7 years ago this new airplane would have been old tech akready soon. Now they can wait for the newest developments especially regarding engines.
However it woukd have been very smart to launch a 767X as a stop gap. This would have been a comparably simple upgrade. Engines already exist (the GEnx-2b), wingbox+gear supporting the larger engines already exists (767-400) and a modern cockpit and avionics already exist as well on the 767 (tanker).
One version sized between the 767-200 and 767-300 and one sized between the 767-300 and 767-400 would have been perfect.
BOEING should better focus on safety standart and remove internal problems first like drug and alcohol problems by some of theyr employees. So why focus on 797 when 787 can do it even better? What about the huge issues with 777XXL?
Just make the 707 again what a plain that was ❤
✈✈✈
Some Idiots seating on the BOEING Board, there's a B787- 10, B787 -9, B787 -8, therefore all that needs to accomplish this feat is a BOEING 787 -7 & B787-6 & WALLA
The 797 will rely on the next generation of engines not only to fly but also to increase efficiency. As we know, the latest engines are responsible for most of the efficiency gains.
I am sure that whatever Boeing may come up with, Airbus will be in a position to re-engine any member of the 320 series.and apply whatever is needed to the airframe to commpete
Not going to happen anytime soon .Boeing doesn't have the money
Let's wait and see what they can do
Yet another fantasy aircraft from Boeing. They will NEVER build this if they can pimp up another museum relic from the past.
Yep, it will be yet another 737, same old front end too!
@@arunphillips6977 nice one .but they don't havevthe money to do it
Put a dress and high-heels on a 787.... and VOILA! You have a "797". You'll also get a new paint job. Don't ask us for quality, be happy with the new paint job we gave you.
Story teller !
thanks for feedback! we'll use real voice soon!
Nope. Too late. The NMA market segment is being taken care of by the A321.
I hope Boeing will get the 797 ready sometime in the 2030s.
thanks for comment, same here but sooner is better
"ready".
click bait. Old news and it was discontinued. Nobody shocked
Yeah, sure
thanks for your comment
It is not gonna happen @@FLIGAVIA
I think Boeing not have money, for a new airplane, it's cost 10 billion and no have.
thanks for your comment
Boeing needs to fire the 2 top layers and hire Burt Rutan, then they have a chance.
And what will Airbus do with the same engine?
A 797 should not be expected before 2025-2028. Considering that the final model of the 747, the 747-8 did not start deliveries until 2011 and that the 737 MAX 9 deliveries only started in 2018, we may not see a need for a 797 until well after even that date. How will Boeing name their planes after 797?Dec 30, 2023
yep thanks for sharing your thoughts
I thought 797 was going to be that truss brace aircraft they were working with NASA to develop.
Cessna 152 with jet's
✈️
✈️
Damn
✈✈✈
Hi, you made a mistake @1:18.
Twice 797-6.
Cheers,
thanks for reminding us
@@FLIGAVIA My pleasure.
Keep up the good work! :)
Boeing "797"... more likely a *red herring* to see how Airbus and previous Boeing buyers react. Probably no more than a concept and some designs & detailed renderings at the moment. Let's see if Boeing can get the 797 off the ground. Pun intended.
No quotes from Boeing made it into your video, so I have blocked your channel.
Click bate… 😂
All speculation.
Sorry, but no. The A350 is the aircraft of the future, not the weeny 787 or it's supposed replacement.
Absolutely
yep, the A350 is also excellent!!!
The A350 is a completely different category.
Another aircraft they are not building and with all the problems there having this will be delayed delayed and delayed with problems
Blatent lies just for views
Whatever.
Blah blah blah blah
Boeing is only 20 years too late on that plane. At this point, Boeing may not have the knowhow to build a new plane. Boeing is nothing but a shadow of the great company it once was.
thanks for sharing