idk if its me but this game fr gives me motion sickness or sum, its either the lag or input delay they purposly put, i can only play this for about 30 mins to an hour before my stomach starts hurting
They just slapped a bunch of Quixel assets together, turned on nanite on the meshes, bought some multiplayer FPS controller off the UE marketplace, added insane lerping to the camera and some lens effects and called it a day.
I literally recreated the game environment in 1 day, they didn't even stress about making their own environment, it's an asset from the UE marketplace, and I also found the controller for 10 dollars on a site
While I do agree with the general thesis, let's be real for a moment. The 1650 is an awful card and was horrible even back when it was first released. I feel deeply sorry for all people who are still stuck with this joke of a GPU.
Dude, this game is nothing more than a tech demo pushed into "eArLy aCcEsS". Optimization usually comes at the end of the game development cycle, these guys haven't even started to develop the game... Bro needs to learn how game development works, before bro is making great claims on the internet about it.
@@mitsuhh It should be obvious that this was sarcasm. As it stands the "game" is nothing more than a tech demo, read steam reviews, there's tons of users complaining about the game being just a skeleton of a game, full of bugs and glitches and little content. In other words: The game development hasn't progressed much at all. The first WOW effect wears off rather quickly and then you see the "game" for what it is, nothing more than a tech demo. Hence it's rather comical if people whine about bad optimization.
If you're here to buy this game let me save you 30$. First of all I'm so tired of this industry releasing a bare bone demo and calling it "early access" to give an excuse. Second of all the game is a barebone and it's really poorly optimized and last thing the anti cheats sucks in this game. If you don't believe me then time will tell when you and your whole team getting aimbotted with just one shot.
but one thing, this game is developed by a small indie studio, and I can understand the outrage with the price yeah, but you must take into consideration a fact that this game is made by few people! It is impressive what a very small team of people can do. Still doesn't justify the price, tho
2 "kids" Im 50 so anyone under 35 is a "kid" to me.....but 2 young men under the age of 21 developed this game. These 2 are going places in life and it seems alot of people are jealous. Jealous they have become millionaires overnight.
Yeah, :( i don't get it , is making game that only playlable on NASA pc profitable ? , i mean most played games on steam is easy to run on any gpu except 💩 tier or outdated gpu like all of the nvidia gt series aside gt 1030 ddr5
My 1050ti can still run Cyberpunk surprisingly well at mostly high settings but I gotta use FSR 2.0 and the Frame Gen mod with the resolution on 720. Game plays at 40 to 70 FPS at all times never dropping past that minimum. This game would probably make my GPU explode though lol.
@@averagechadlegionary5824 at that point why would you even use "mostly high" settings, wont it look better if you just play on low 1080p with no fsr 2.0?
@@Ciffer-1998 It looks worse on low with 1080 BC the lighting and textures look like dogshit on the lowest settings. With low 1080, the clearer resolution makes all the lower graphical settings super noticeable. I CAN play on 1080 without it lagging constantly but my game doesn’t stay consistently within the 40 to 60 range and dips substantially which sucks BC consistent minor frame dips are vastly more noticeable in Cyberpunk than in other games where I experience similar dips to FPS.
@@Ciffer-1998 Also some of the mods I use require the textures to remain on high to function properly but I will say that it looks better in 1080 with all the settings on high or high to medium and a few lows like crowd density. My FSR also doesn’t pixelate very often unlike in this video.
I think developers should look at the list of most popular GPUs on Steam and see what's the most popular and develop the game around that. That way most people will be able to get a good experience.
This game looks like something from 2000's on low settings and yet even powerful GPUs struggle to run it on lowest settings... That's what inexistence of optimization does
This is an early access game developed by 2 French brothers one who is 17 years old and the other is 20. The game is supposed to push the boundaries of photo realism. Obviously it won’t be optimized for over decade old cards.
@@zWORMzGaming The majority of gtx 1650 are from the budget laptops and prebuilts I think.. also at some places it was offered as the cheapest nvidia gpu (ofc most places say that nvidia is better than amd) so most non tech savvy people just went with it.
The big majority of the entry level laptops until the recent times were sold with the 1650. I bought mine in 2021, when the only available thing was an overpriced 1650 laptop that was still cheaper than building a 1650 desktop
It was developed specifically to be a gimmick game. I don't think this is meant to be a proper long-term supported game, it's more of a glorified tech demo
@@unearthlynarratives_ idk according to the video I just watched with it worse case is like 40fps on it. 1080p ultra or with FSR like 60ish even more with frame gen but yeah the game isn't really well optimized and depends too much on upscaling and FG.
No. You'll get about 20 to 30 fps. Don't dare comparing Rockstar's RAGE Engine with Unreal Engine 5. ( if we exclude the finals, that's greatly optimized. )
I have a GTX 1660 Ti and I can run the game at epic settings with quality fsr and fg at 30 and even 60 fps at times. Didn't think the GTX 1650 would perform THIS BAD
you make me want tp benchmark this on my gtz 1660 super to see if its any better? i might do it on my channel because i heard it the 1660 can handle this game.
But just to "save" the 1650, its (as i know) the most intense map. (ik the torture, i also had a 1650, but with gddr6 ram, now i have a 1080ti, worth every frickin' penny)
Now try it with Lossless Scaling. I can almost guarantee it will work if you use 2x scaling. It would be rendering the game at 540p, which is gonna push a quarter of the pixels. Then, through the miracle of AI, it will output at 1080p. I've been using it to play Forza Horizon 4 at 1440p60 on a GTX 670, lol. I won't claim it is perfect but I was just as competitive in online racing if I had been running at a native 1440p with 120fps on my main PC. I'm also using 2x frame generation and the latency penalty with LS frame gen is lower than FSR or DLSS, particularly in performance mode. These results say far more about the game than it does the 1650. If the tech demo is this bad, you can expect the final product to be a stinky turd. What's up with all the pixelation? Looks like you're playing Police Quest: Open Season from 1993.
You owe us a pair of new eyes
idk if its me but this game fr gives me motion sickness or sum, its either the lag or input delay they purposly put, i can only play this for about 30 mins to an hour before my stomach starts hurting
and a sanity check with our local pshyciatrist
Lmao
OH boy, you haven't seen MY Computer..
Pro tip if you look at the ground 24/7 it should be playable at 720p on a 1650.
Golden eye 007 speedrunning all over again
One of my friend used to this and used to tell me that he likes when fps are high. He only used to look up when it is needed to shoot.😂
Its dead this gpu
They just slapped a bunch of Quixel assets together, turned on nanite on the meshes, bought some multiplayer FPS controller off the UE marketplace, added insane lerping to the camera and some lens effects and called it a day.
Yeah and people still somehow think that this game is impressive🤦
@@anonymous16472show me a fps that looks better
Ikr, this game is overhyped af
It basically just trash 💀
I literally recreated the game environment in 1 day, they didn't even stress about making their own environment, it's an asset from the UE marketplace, and I also found the controller for 10 dollars on a site
Bro, 14 FPS at 720p low WITH UPSCALING 😅
Developers have stopped caring about optimization.
While I do agree with the general thesis, let's be real for a moment. The 1650 is an awful card and was horrible even back when it was first released. I feel deeply sorry for all people who are still stuck with this joke of a GPU.
Dude, this game is nothing more than a tech demo pushed into "eArLy aCcEsS". Optimization usually comes at the end of the game development cycle, these guys haven't even started to develop the game...
Bro needs to learn how game development works, before bro is making great claims on the internet about it.
@@subfreakuent what do you mean "these guys haven't even started to develop the game"?
@@mitsuhh It should be obvious that this was sarcasm. As it stands the "game" is nothing more than a tech demo, read steam reviews, there's tons of users complaining about the game being just a skeleton of a game, full of bugs and glitches and little content.
In other words: The game development hasn't progressed much at all. The first WOW effect wears off rather quickly and then you see the "game" for what it is, nothing more than a tech demo.
Hence it's rather comical if people whine about bad optimization.
bro, it's a 1650
If you're here to buy this game let me save you 30$. First of all I'm so tired of this industry releasing a bare bone demo and calling it "early access" to give an excuse. Second of all the game is a barebone and it's really poorly optimized and last thing the anti cheats sucks in this game. If you don't believe me then time will tell when you and your whole team getting aimbotted with just one shot.
but one thing, this game is developed by a small indie studio, and I can understand the outrage with the price yeah, but you must take into consideration a fact that this game is made by few people! It is impressive what a very small team of people can do. Still doesn't justify the price, tho
The industry at question = 2 college guys
2 "kids"
Im 50 so anyone under 35 is a "kid" to me.....but 2 young men under the age of 21 developed this game.
These 2 are going places in life and it seems alot of people are jealous.
Jealous they have become millionaires overnight.
@@MIKEx2112bro get off the internet 💀
@MIKEx2112 Jealous? This is just a criticism and not Jealousy. It's just a feedback from the players so the developers can take into consideration.
Now a days 4070 is required for 1080p gaming lol.
as a 4070 user i can confirm that
me when i think the latest unoptimized ue5 title is a good representation of an average games performance🤡
that is fucking hilarious, wasting 500$ or much more in a GPU, for the LUCKY 60 fps medium, what a great time
@@BastianXify depends on game, cyberpunk on Max with RT easy 60-100fps
@@BastianXify me when i think the latest unoptimized ue5 title is a good representation of an average games performance🤡
when interpreting the patterns of the frame time graph is more fun than playing the game...
Ty for going through this nightmare for us
Haven't watched the video yet but I can imagine it's not going to run very good😅
"not running very good" is very optimistic 🤣
@@zWORMzGaming Single digits for the win!
@@zWORMzGamingtry bodycam on steam deck 😂
That beginning of the 1080p test almost gave me motion sickness
"just stop being motion sensitive"
Awesome optimization, deserves applause
I didn't expect another UE5 game to be optimized worse than Ark survival ascended. I guess there is always something worse.
Devs making todays games don't optimise them at all, just require you to have a $1000 gpu to play them.
Yeah, :( i don't get it , is making game that only playlable on NASA pc profitable ? , i mean most played games on steam is easy to run on any gpu except 💩 tier or outdated gpu like all of the nvidia gt series aside gt 1030 ddr5
Can't wait to see 1050 ti shit itself while playing it
My 1050ti can still run Cyberpunk surprisingly well at mostly high settings but I gotta use FSR 2.0 and the Frame Gen mod with the resolution on 720. Game plays at 40 to 70 FPS at all times never dropping past that minimum. This game would probably make my GPU explode though lol.
@@averagechadlegionary5824 at that point why would you even use "mostly high" settings, wont it look better if you just play on low 1080p with no fsr 2.0?
This game is trash just another unreal engine 5 trashy optimized tech demo
@@Ciffer-1998 It looks worse on low with 1080 BC the lighting and textures look like dogshit on the lowest settings. With low 1080, the clearer resolution makes all the lower graphical settings super noticeable. I CAN play on 1080 without it lagging constantly but my game doesn’t stay consistently within the 40 to 60 range and dips substantially which sucks BC consistent minor frame dips are vastly more noticeable in Cyberpunk than in other games where I experience similar dips to FPS.
@@Ciffer-1998 Also some of the mods I use require the textures to remain on high to function properly but I will say that it looks better in 1080 with all the settings on high or high to medium and a few lows like crowd density. My FSR also doesn’t pixelate very often unlike in this video.
insane to me that this gpu is so popular and games like this dont even attempt to work on them
1650 was a joke when it came out and its obvious that ue5 is not gonna work on these cards
@@DaysDH lol doesnt matter, people bought them
@@Silver_Wolf-141Which budget card is worth buying, like rtx 3060 or 4060?
4060 obviously
Thank you for testing this out, i have a gtx 1650, upgrading to rx 8000 or rtx 50 series when it comes out
Same
Gonna do the same if i have money😂
That wall of frame is as thick as the wall of attack on titan
The last test, those graphics look lowkey amazing..
So photorealistic graphic will be with next update right ?
I'm genuinely impressed that it took that long for it to crash.
Instead of frames per second, we should start counting seconds per frame
This card costs around R$850 which is US$ 158,07 in Brazil brand new... Now you imagine the most recent cards...
This game at this settings is like full motion videos from the 90's, it would be impressive back then and no man.
You give me some good advice and a very good benchmark testing TH-camr to see what GPU is the right for me thank you.
I think developers should look at the list of most popular GPUs on Steam and see what's the most popular and develop the game around that. That way most people will be able to get a good experience.
YOO 31TH... I tried to download that game on r7 240 💀💀
Oh god 🤣🤣🤣
Now it's time to see how RX580 goes
you know its bad when the frame time graph is playing terraria may god have mercy on the gt 710
I bought this little “monster” recently - exclusively for old games 😁
nice ppt presentation.
PowerPoint*
@@lucasgawor7471 The file extension of a powerpoint file is .ppt...
@@unearthlynarratives_ correct. Your point?
@@lucasgawor7471 my point is you know what he meant, but you seem to be one of those sad kids that goes through every comment to correct someone.
@@unearthlynarratives_ why are you assuming gender?
The reason for the so low fps is basically vram, this dont happen on iGPUs even tho they're slower because they can just allocate more
bro started playing DOOM Oldschool
this doom bodycam mod goes crazy
The Gt 1030 can eat that game for breakfast
I didn't know that you were benchmarking PowerPoint 🤣
atleast you get the real bodycam experience
With an r9 290 you also have 20fps on the bush map, BUT you can play at 45/50fps (medium) on the other maps (no frame generation).
People really do be looking at these graphics and say "Ah yes, the perfect graphics with the perfect gameplay"
keep it up , bc of ur videos i could decide on what components i should get for my pc
because* your*
@@lucasgawor7471 stop being the grammar police.
@@HenrikPflanz-o4d I never even started.
@@HenrikPflanz-o4d I'm not.
@@HenrikPflanz-o4d I never even started.
This game finally tells you that new generation GPU is a must 😂
can we get a test on the 1660 ti? it used to be a beast now im scared to buy the game lol
I'm probably not covering this anymore! But the 1660Ti would be able to get 20-30 fps, which is still not playable so don't buy the game 👍
pro tip: if you're below the minimum requirements for a game, don't buy the game
@@theorphanobliterator well nah derr
ah my old gpu, sucks to see it having a hard time here
The demo , you are right and I laughed , I refunded.
Crazy and interesting video. RIP 1650 GDDR5.
My head is about to blowup omg
Tá doido! Obviamente nao é um jogo pra 1650, pela primeira vez KKKKKKKKKKKKKK não dá pra ver isso não!!
Eae, assistiu o Rock in Rio Lisboa?
I just got rid of my 1650 nitro 5 for a 7800xt with r5 7600! Really happy with it
This game looks like something from 2000's on low settings and yet even powerful GPUs struggle to run it on lowest settings... That's what inexistence of optimization does
Looks like ps1 remastered but forgot to actually remaster it.
This is an early access game developed by 2 French brothers one who is 17 years old and the other is 20. The game is supposed to push the boundaries of photo realism. Obviously it won’t be optimized for over decade old cards.
Test rx 580 too please❤
thats a no sry pal
could you test some more gpus in the last of us part 1? :))
This broke my monitor just letting the video play
Can you please test out rx 580 ?
My head hurts watching this.
can you try the 2060 in the next video?
Please test bodycam on Rx 6600
can you do it again just not on the laggiest map?
Brother can you do a review of the program called LossLess Scaling? Thanks for al of your videos keep it up!
O have no idea why people were buying 1650 not a 1060 which performing better in the same price
Probably because the 1060 can only be bought used
maybe the low power consumption
@@zWORMzGaming The majority of gtx 1650 are from the budget laptops and prebuilts I think.. also at some places it was offered as the cheapest nvidia gpu (ofc most places say that nvidia is better than amd) so most non tech savvy people just went with it.
The big majority of the entry level laptops until the recent times were sold with the 1650. I bought mine in 2021, when the only available thing was an overpriced 1650 laptop that was still cheaper than building a 1650 desktop
One of the few cards that was affordable and abundant during the pandemic! My old laptop had a 1650 and I enjoyed it a lot.
This is so much like the metal gear solid 5 on ps3... Runs like potato but still playable enough
Can you test the games on the GTX TITAN Z graphics card at the present time? I've liked and subscribed to the channel ❤
yeah what do we expect
i think it's crazy how they are making games not that playable for the 2nd most used gpu :c
It was developed specifically to be a gimmick game. I don't think this is meant to be a proper long-term supported game, it's more of a glorified tech demo
@@lathrin but this isn't the only example unfortunately
can you try it on the 1080ti?
Don't expect it to be good any anything lower than a RTX 3060
@@BluD Looking at the performance, I don't think even a 3060 will be good enough lol
@@unearthlynarratives_ you'd definitely need FSR on for it but it'd be somewhat playable at least.
@@BluD Yeah I suppose, doubt it'd be very enjoyable tho lol
@@unearthlynarratives_ idk according to the video I just watched with it worse case is like 40fps on it. 1080p ultra or with FSR like 60ish even more with frame gen but yeah the game isn't really well optimized and depends too much on upscaling and FG.
i have an 1660 and i can run red dead redemption 2 with high settings perfectly 60 fps can i play bodycam with atleast 60 fps ?
60 fpm
No. You'll get about 20 to 30 fps. Don't dare comparing Rockstar's RAGE Engine with Unreal Engine 5. ( if we exclude the finals, that's greatly optimized. )
No , expect cinematic 24 fps with lowest possible settings, unless this game suffer a lot on 4gb gpu maybe
i played it in a gtx 1660 ti at 70 fps on high settings with fg
good stuff 👍👍
I hope the update this version I'll sit on it for a couple weeks and see what happens
call Bodycam for Brokencam or LagCam for now lol
It's BodyScam definitely
Now i know what it would be like to play any decent game 😂
Could you possibly benchmark the ryzen 5 5600 with no dedicated gpu? You can have a nice experience for dirt cheap and not that many people know that.
Could you please make a tutorial for your afterburner layout
GTX 1650 OC + GDDR6 = GTX 970
Didn't find any game i couldn't play with an RX6600 at HD resolution.
Wonder if this will be the case here as well.
I have a GTX 1660 Ti and I can run the game at epic settings with quality fsr and fg at 30 and even 60 fps at times. Didn't think the GTX 1650 would perform THIS BAD
I'd love to see how well the r9 290x fares in this game
Please test it on RTX 3060 12BG VRAM
8:41 ah, kryzzp, that is because he is ALSO playing on a 1650 :D
1:25 imagine the G100 here (if it could even start)
bro even a 1050 ti will literally explode and ur talking about G100 😂😂😂😂
Not even gt 710 will start this game let alone g100
Bro it's like 10 times slower than GT 710 why are you even saying this
@@РамазанАбу-я8п I think it's just funny to imagine how bad a g100 would be these days, how much worse it'd be thant it still was back then
@@lewisbohme7078 G 100 is literally half of a 210 (which is already EXTREMELY bad) so what's your expectations bro 💀
you make me want tp benchmark this on my gtz 1660 super to see if its any better? i might do it on my channel because i heard it the 1660 can handle this game.
Could you test the RTX 4060
Queijo do fogo infernal? Kryzzp was Brazilian all this time? 🇧🇷
been looking for a RX6650XT/ rx 6600XT video everywhere. i cant find any
It's insane that lowering the setting does nothing.
again devs think everyone own a 4090 :)
average realistic game in the 2000's:
That shit looks like golden eye for the Nintendo 64 🤣🤣🤣
Its time to go to bed, GTX1650...
I'm on the 1650 and my game runs perfectly fine
you should test on the 4060
Can you test it with the 1660 I wanna buy the game but idk if my gpu can handle it
But just to "save" the 1650, its (as i know) the most intense map.
(ik the torture, i also had a 1650, but with gddr6 ram, now i have a 1080ti, worth every frickin' penny)
rx6800 will you test?
Now try it with Lossless Scaling. I can almost guarantee it will work if you use 2x scaling. It would be rendering the game at 540p, which is gonna push a quarter of the pixels. Then, through the miracle of AI, it will output at 1080p.
I've been using it to play Forza Horizon 4 at 1440p60 on a GTX 670, lol. I won't claim it is perfect but I was just as competitive in online racing if I had been running at a native 1440p with 120fps on my main PC. I'm also using 2x frame generation and the latency penalty with LS frame gen is lower than FSR or DLSS, particularly in performance mode.
These results say far more about the game than it does the 1650. If the tech demo is this bad, you can expect the final product to be a stinky turd. What's up with all the pixelation? Looks like you're playing Police Quest: Open Season from 1993.
wait, my Arc A750 has no problem. a 3070 struggles?
My gpu is slightly below the minimum requirements and my cpu is slightly above the minimum requirements
What's your gpu
@@ChristianoRonaldo235 RTX 4050 mobile
Would like to see the RX 6400 or RX 6500XT next
what a optimization
how is the 3070 struggling? it gets 60+ fps with high settings
This game would get more sales if it was called BootyCam
time for 1060