LOVE, LOVE, LOVE Michael York! We had a lovely encounter in Gelson's supermarket in Los Angeles c. 1980. I'm 72 now and this remains one of the fondest memories of my life. Brilliant! So glad to hear to this lovely voice - just surfing TH-cam at 1:00 AM, trying to find something scientific that's way above the pay grade of my pea brain so I can fall back asleep. Charming! ❤🙏🏻🥰
A nice voice no question and I don't mean this as a criticism, but the accent and tone also make me feel a bit like I'm listening to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
0:14, Introduction. 2:57, Ideas About The Universe. 15:27, The Beginning Of The Universe. 19:59, The Expanding Universe. 29:19, The Friedmann Models. 42:13, The Big Bang. 53:07, Black Holes. 1:27:28, Black Holes Ain’t So Black. 1:53:39, General Relativity And Quantum Mechanics. 1:57:44, The Origin And Fate Of The Universe.
Im not sure if it’s due to Stephen’s impeccable humor, or Douglas Adam’s incredible intellect, but the two are forever becoming singular in my understanding.
Oh, funny, I just posted about this above: do you think it might be that Michael York's reading style is reminiscent of The HItchhiker's Guide's voice in the BBC TV version?
I fell asleep and woke up to this 95% through, I know I didn't pick this video but I hope a bit of that knowledge came through while I was sleeping. I'm still very confused hahahaha
You probably learned it all. I woke up the next day mumbling about black holes and whatnot. People were like , hey man , you learning about physics? And I was like, what?
Ugh, at first I tried listening to "relativity, a general and special theory." By Einstein. Its super simplified, and I'm pretty smart, but I don't think I've ever felt so unable to comprehend something. I slept through most of it. This is simpler in comparison. If you read that one you may find this one easier
Having looked him up......Oh yeah! Michael York! I've enjoyed his acting in many movies! The fun thing about dementia is that you get to enjoy things all over again!
I think, Cabaret and Logan's Run are his biggest roles. Tho he has been around for decades. He had a cameo in something fairly recently, Zoolander maybe.
In our current understanding of the universe, it isn’t expanding into anything. Instead, it’s creating space as it expands. A helpful analogy is the surface of a balloon being inflated. As the balloon grows, the surface stretches and expands, but there’s no edge or external space it’s moving into - the expansion itself generates the space.
In our current understanding of the universe, it isn’t expanding into anything. Instead, it’s creating space as it expands. A helpful analogy is the surface of a balloon being inflated. As the balloon grows, the surface stretches and expands, but there’s no edge or external space it’s moving into - the expansion itself generates the space.
Not just any British accent. Micheal York's voice is so colorful and interesting! I've heard British voices that could put you to sleep in under a minute.
Theory of everything means interconnection of people, things and data while theory of internet of everything is the interconnections of everything on devices frontier, then this devices are used by people at the same time. Interconnectivity of theory of everything with theory of internet of everything. Things look very different yet they are very similar by rule of atoms. All atom obey same rule of thump, yes diverse per diverse number of proton and electron but in the end they spin torus for electron over larger area and proton on compressed area. Internet of things try to interconnect everything into a one framework where we can correlate between to determine the best course of action that doesn't negatively impact other on the network of interconnected. This parameters are vast amount of data that humans can simulate to exert data processing, yes we can process briefly to the nearest 98% co efficient interval give or take. Sequencing of this atoms yield different organs or things, there relation therefore become the key pillar to one combination offer different property hence different functionality. By this different functionality they seem different yet not actually since a symbiosis of function is the elephant on the room. This function substitute another as well as it differ with another only to the one substituted and the other that differ supplement each other in the inverse of what we would have expect, a spin motion of function. Theory of everything therefore attempt to map this for manipulation as it does fit us, FUNCTION SPIN TORUS as well and that's the area of interest for humanity becoming intergalactic civilization will have the power of GOD's.
Stephen never upgraded from one of the standard computer voices. I was a little surprised at first that they didn't use it since I'm sure it's available and it certainly would be authentic enough.
I'm glad they did. I like Stephan for his choice to keep that voice, even though I don't really know the story behind his choice. I can't listen to it for hours on end, whereas Michael York's voice is like a brain massage....I think it suits Stephan quite nicely.
I'm not religious or superstitious, for the most part...but I do like to get rid of that number when I can....whether it has power or (almost certainly) not, it's insinuation in my mind is ugly.
I don't know the truth, but I believe that current theories about the origin, creation, and future of life and the universe are based on completely false assumptions. Khalid Masood
Looks like Steven was wrong as we have still not managed to know if string theory is the ultimate theory and the last century has elapsed and it looks like we won’t probably know now till at least another 30 odd years - so how can we trust what he’s saying about all his other ideas and predictions ? 🤔
They're only theories. Guesses, really. The Hadron Collider has not found anything other than the Higgs field. Now, the space telescopes are providing more questions than answers. The more we know, the more we realise it's a bit more complicated than we thought and possibly completely beyond us.
Science is proof of an omnipotent and sentient power far beyond our comprehension that has been and always will be the architectural mastermind of all existence.
Hawking did not accept scriptural answers. He used man made answers to explain everything. Scripture gives us simple statements and states, “The just will live by faith.” Romans 1:16-17 The gospel is the “good news” that God wants men to pay attention to. The good news…. Jesus was born of a virgin. He lived a sinless life. Died for our sins and rose from the dead after three days in the grave, and ascended into Heaven where He sits at the right hand of the father until He returns as King. We believe it and accept it or we reject it. That determines your eternity and where you will spend it. That is what happened to me and I thank Jesus forever more. The rest of what Hawking says doesn’t matter one bit.
@@algomaone121 When your theory cannot account for 99.99% of the mass of the Universe, your theory is good, just maybe for another theoretical Universe. Is this enough proof for you?
I find it hilarious when hwite people think about the universe in terms of the theories that only came out in the 19th century. As if Einstein and other western intellectuals didn’t derive inspiration from ancient thinkers from the east. If I want to learn credible theory about the universe I’ll learn from the ancient ancestors, thanks. Not some people who present the universe using their own theories as the foundation:
@@nrtstealth9502 What are your thoughts on old and credible encyclopedias describing the Antarctic and the firmament, my point being, why should we believe this bloke?
@@nrtstealth9502 So, why do old encyclopedias refer to a firmament in great detail? I didn't write them. You are just aiming personal attacks without addressing my valid argument?
LOVE, LOVE, LOVE Michael York! We had a lovely encounter in Gelson's supermarket in Los Angeles c. 1980. I'm 72 now and this remains one of the fondest memories of my life. Brilliant! So glad to hear to this lovely voice - just surfing TH-cam at 1:00 AM, trying to find something scientific that's way above the pay grade of my pea brain so I can fall back asleep. Charming! ❤🙏🏻🥰
Michael York. That's right. I just woke up to this playing and recognized that voice from somewhere but couldn't place who. Thanks.
All over my face
A nice voice no question and I don't mean this as a criticism, but the accent and tone also make me feel a bit like I'm listening to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
"Run, Runner!"
0:14, Introduction.
2:57, Ideas About The Universe.
15:27, The Beginning Of The Universe.
19:59, The Expanding Universe.
29:19, The Friedmann Models.
42:13, The Big Bang.
53:07, Black Holes.
1:27:28, Black Holes Ain’t So Black.
1:53:39, General Relativity And Quantum Mechanics.
1:57:44, The Origin And Fate Of The Universe.
🎉 #INDEX☝🏻🍵#HYPE
Should be pinned top Comment!
thanks buddy .You helped me🙃❤
Im not sure if it’s due to Stephen’s impeccable humor, or Douglas Adam’s incredible intellect, but the two are forever becoming singular in my understanding.
Oh, funny, I just posted about this above: do you think it might be that Michael York's reading style is reminiscent of The HItchhiker's Guide's voice in the BBC TV version?
Narrated by Michael York!!!! Awesome!
That Austin powers boss from Austin powers. Awesome
Extremely excellent listening.
Had to listen to it several times. Astounding !!!!!!!
the last bit of the 1st lecture confused me a bit so i relistened a few times but man its such a great audiobook
I fell asleep and woke up to this 95% through, I know I didn't pick this video but I hope a bit of that knowledge came through while I was sleeping. I'm still very confused hahahaha
You probably learned it all. I woke up the next day mumbling about black holes and whatnot. People were like , hey man , you learning about physics? And I was like, what?
It litteraly went into my dream... No joke
Ugh, at first I tried listening to "relativity, a general and special theory." By Einstein. Its super simplified, and I'm pretty smart, but I don't think I've ever felt so unable to comprehend something. I slept through most of it. This is simpler in comparison. If you read that one you may find this one easier
I can relate. I had an excellent science education, but it was circa 1970s. This is WAY over my head. Physics is a whole new science now.
I have forgotten who Michael York is. I'm going to have to look him up. His Narration is Magical! What a delightful voice to lend to Stephan Hawking.
Having looked him up......Oh yeah! Michael York! I've enjoyed his acting in many movies!
The fun thing about dementia is that you get to enjoy things all over again!
I think, Cabaret and Logan's Run are his biggest roles. Tho he has been around for decades. He had a cameo in something fairly recently, Zoolander maybe.
Island of Dr.Moreau with Burt Lancaster.
For a second it sounded like a sandman gives us a lecture - what a Sci Fi flashback. Thanks Mr. York
My crystal has changed color to red...
Beautiful voice and pronunciation. At last a British English and not the usual american twang
This was great. Thank u for posting
Save me getting to the end please, what's the question to the ultimate answer of life the universe and everything, 42?
If the universe is expanding, what's it expanding into? I'm asking is there space beyond our universe and if so, then how much?
In our current understanding of the universe, it isn’t expanding into anything. Instead, it’s creating space as it expands. A helpful analogy is the surface of a balloon being inflated. As the balloon grows, the surface stretches and expands, but there’s no edge or external space it’s moving into - the expansion itself generates the space.
In our current understanding of the universe, it isn’t expanding into anything. Instead, it’s creating space as it expands. A helpful analogy is the surface of a balloon being inflated. As the balloon grows, the surface stretches and expands, but there’s no edge or external space it’s moving into - the expansion itself generates the space.
Asked and answered. Listen again.
Your upload choices are...eclectic....from new age sludge to hardcore science. I love this one!
Wayne Dyer; "Every Problem has a Spiritual solution". gag me with the excrement of a male cow.
This is a great book to put you to sleep unless, I suppose, you are a physicist. I wish I had the educational foundation to appreciate it.
Thank you for sharing this; I enjoyed it very much!
I like the narrator - British accents make it sound smarter lol
The lead actor in Logan's Run
@@anthonymullen6300 All I could remember is "disturbing dystopian sci fi movie" Thanks for restoring the name to my memory.
Not just any British accent. Micheal York's voice is so colorful and interesting! I've heard British voices that could put you to sleep in under a minute.
Stephen Hawking is British.
@@frederickzorn3542 naw!!! mind blown! lol. (was)
Theory of everything means interconnection of people, things and data while theory of internet of everything is the interconnections of everything on devices frontier, then this devices are used by people at the same time. Interconnectivity of theory of everything with theory of internet of everything. Things look very different yet they are very similar by rule of atoms. All atom obey same rule of thump, yes diverse per diverse number of proton and electron but in the end they spin torus for electron over larger area and proton on compressed area.
Internet of things try to interconnect everything into a one framework where we can correlate between to determine the best course of action that doesn't negatively impact other on the network of interconnected. This parameters are vast amount of data that humans can simulate to exert data processing, yes we can process briefly to the nearest 98% co efficient interval give or take.
Sequencing of this atoms yield different organs or things, there relation therefore become the key pillar to one combination offer different property hence different functionality. By this different functionality they seem different yet not actually since a symbiosis of function is the elephant on the room. This function substitute another as well as it differ with another only to the one substituted and the other that differ supplement each other in the inverse of what we would have expect, a spin motion of function.
Theory of everything therefore attempt to map this for manipulation as it does fit us, FUNCTION SPIN TORUS as well and that's the area of interest for humanity becoming intergalactic civilization will have the power of GOD's.
Thx for sharing
This is gold
Perfect listening during the day at 1.25x speed. Normal speed at night is even better😂
Thank you 💯
He's a runner
I'm up for renewal too.👍
Wasn't that their euphemism for death? Why would you want that?
I love how he made my changes after i wrote to him as a kid; then, never gave me credit.
Michael York! absolute legend! ❤
"But what does it all mean, Basil?"
David Attenborough voice would be the icing
David had the best voice for explanation
Imagine free energy from such a concept like of a black hole, so much mass collapsing on itself creating unlimited energy.. a drive?
Austin, that's my mother!
Dang, I thought this was the scary book guy. That's Stephen King...
Self actualization is a much scarier concept
Hawking was the scary book writer's stage name during his stand-up years.
@@bradleebowers8203😅😅
😂
King is an idiot
Stephen never upgraded from one of the standard computer voices. I was a little surprised at first that they didn't use it since I'm sure it's available and it certainly would be authentic enough.
I'm glad they did. I like Stephan for his choice to keep that voice, even though I don't really know the story behind his choice. I can't listen to it for hours on end, whereas Michael York's voice is like a brain massage....I think it suits Stephan quite nicely.
I was hoping to listen in Hawkings digital voice.
2:53:27
Who else was hoping to hear Stephen Hawking's synthetic speech computer voice to read the entire book?
Go hawking go. I figured I'd leave scientific comment here because I'm number 1.
Peanut butter is not a solid.
Unless you buy the old fashioned kind and let it sit, and then the oils separate, and one has a liquid layer on top of a mostly solid under layer lol
@@eugenebelford4340 nope. Not soild
bookmark: 12:05
Are you trying to show this bookmark to someone?
great audiobook to sleep
I would've totally listened to hawkings robit voice
Tell my mom that I love her.
the wildest comment I've ever read
Are you ok?? :(
Should have been narrated with that electronic speech thing he used. Would have been more authentic that way
Changed the like count to 667
Good man
Booooooo
Aren't you a little devil???
I'm not religious or superstitious, for the most part...but I do like to get rid of that number when I can....whether it has power or (almost certainly) not, it's insinuation in my mind is ugly.
@@joewalsh4713 So, Atheist or Satanist? What's your objection? Real or not, the object of the symbolism is ugly. I like to erase it as well.
Like a comets projected path...😊
Color inversion... Turn setting on...😮👋🏻💯✌🏻😂
IS THAT BASIL FROM AUSTIN POWERS?!?!!! 😍😍😍
53:05 L03 Black Holes
Man I was hoping in Hawkings voice
I fell asleep in seconds!
And yet you had time to comment
@@anthonymullen6300 I know, right!? Seems strange!
You would have snored through the Sermon on the Mount.
@@gordonbartlett1921 😆😅
There is an incredible app... Solar system scope...
№.1000? Do replies account for number of comments?❤🎉😊
I made it go to 819
1:44
42:13
I don't know the truth, but I believe that current theories about the origin, creation, and future of life and the universe are based on completely false assumptions.
Khalid Masood
Thomas Jose Gonzalez Larry Gonzalez Edward
🖤
Like Michael York
Stephen Hawking 😊
Haha.. welcome boss
1:28.
The book is better
40:20
!!!!
They used to think Earth was flat....
99?
And later they believed the physical universe was everything, Too much science and no philosophy.
What else are you imaging there is other than all the universe(s) and all that it/they contain(s)?
who did? the book states in the introduction that aristotle believed it to be round, there isn't much 'they' before that
Twenty-two divide seven.
3.142???repeating
119/7=17. 119/3=39Remainder2.😂😮😅❤
Looks like Steven was wrong as we have still not managed to know if string theory is the ultimate theory and the last century has elapsed and it looks like we won’t probably know now till at least another 30 odd years - so how can we trust what he’s saying about all his other ideas and predictions ? 🤔
They're only theories. Guesses, really.
The Hadron Collider has not found anything other than the Higgs field.
Now, the space telescopes are providing more questions than answers.
The more we know, the more we realise it's a bit more complicated than we thought and possibly completely beyond us.
Martinez Kenneth Robinson Helen Hall Sandra
Britannicas in the 40s refer to the firmament etc. Then it all suddenly disappeared in subsequent versions. So, before offering all this,explain that.
Garcia Nancy Lee Kenneth Davis Jennifer
What about white oles
Mah doink
Could of narrated with a.i and we could of pretended was hawking himself
a bad guesser
Thompson Kenneth Rodriguez Elizabeth Williams Karen
Lo😊. Yea pelleted. D
Why should I believe any of it?
66-
th-cam.com/video/MYjrfNMSO4g/w-d-xo.html
Nice try Diddy
Atheist, here is your bible.
This hiy is wrong about everything. There are better quantum physicists.
Science is proof of an omnipotent and sentient power far beyond our comprehension that has been and always will be the architectural mastermind of all existence.
(10³)⁷.
p
p pp
p
p😊 ok😊
Hawking did not accept scriptural answers. He used man made answers to explain everything. Scripture gives us simple statements and states, “The just will live by faith.” Romans 1:16-17 The gospel is the “good news” that God wants men to pay attention to. The good news…. Jesus was born of a virgin. He lived a sinless life. Died for our sins and rose from the dead after three days in the grave, and ascended into Heaven where He sits at the right hand of the father until He returns as King. We believe it and accept it or we reject it. That determines your eternity and where you will spend it. That is what happened to me and I thank Jesus forever more. The rest of what Hawking says doesn’t matter one bit.
Hawking’s work on TOE was a pathetic waste of time. Stephen needed only speak to my wife, who knows fucking everything.
His science is just as broken as he was.
Prove it scientifically 😂
@@algomaone121 When your theory cannot account for 99.99% of the mass of the Universe, your theory is good, just maybe for another theoretical Universe. Is this enough proof for you?
Where's the funny voice? Disappointed.
How pretentious a book title is this.
I find it hilarious when hwite people think about the universe in terms of the theories that only came out in the 19th century. As if Einstein and other western intellectuals didn’t derive inspiration from ancient thinkers from the east. If I want to learn credible theory about the universe I’ll learn from the ancient ancestors, thanks. Not some people who present the universe using their own theories as the foundation:
Whatever.
those dang white people
The earth is flat, with the firmament above it. Any talk of it being round islaughable.
Your lack of education and common sense is laughable and quite sad
@@nrtstealth9502 😭
@@nrtstealth9502 What are your thoughts on old and credible encyclopedias describing the Antarctic and the firmament, my point being, why should we believe this bloke?
@@nrtstealth9502 So, why do old encyclopedias refer to a firmament in great detail? I didn't write them. You are just aiming personal attacks without addressing my valid argument?
@@nrtstealth9502 Can you answer my question, please?
trash book full of lies.
Martin Edward Jones Anthony Hernandez George