2020 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon & Sahara: off-road (+ POV)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ค. 2020
  • 2020 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon (black) & 2020 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (red) off-roading in Hummer Centrum, Prague
    Engine: 1995 ccm
    Power: 200 kW/272 PS @ 5250 rpm
    Torque: 400 Nm @ 3000 rpm
    Max. speed: 180 kmh (Sahara), 160 kmh (Rubicon)
    0-100 kmh: 7.6 s (Sahara), 8.9 s kmh (Rubicon)
    - auto-mania.cz/srovnali-jsme-j...
    ____________
    Do you like my videos? Support me: www.paypal.me/PavelSrp . Thank you!
    #jeep #jeepwrangler #offroad
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 59

  • @illcodino
    @illcodino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Thanks this video save me a lot of money, Sahara 2.0 works perfect for me

  • @macloveemail
    @macloveemail 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    At 1:12 and 1:20 get to see sway bar difference with the front passenger wheel(s) nice! Love the multiple camera angles and the slalom track!

  • @blackgenesis7472
    @blackgenesis7472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Rubicon trim worth buying only if you are to do hardcore offroading/ major rock climbing - that's where lockers shine.
    Anything lesser - BLD brake locking differential will handle no problem.
    Suspension - Rubicon suspension can be bought $100 used in US. Many go for higher then stock rubi anyway.
    Wheels and tires - majority (including Rubicon owners ) buy more offset /bigher/better. Or people mount large tires on stock wheels.
    Fromt sway bar -can easily.unbolt sway bar links / buy inexpensive sway bar disconnect

  • @4x4adventure_pl
    @4x4adventure_pl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An offroader's dream journey beautifully portrayed in this captivating video.

  • @IskateUphill
    @IskateUphill 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Yep, the first 40 seconds showed me why a Rubicon is the better choice

    • @Beautifulglenda
      @Beautifulglenda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Sahara has stock tires tho. The Rubicon have upgraded tires

  • @user-ys4ky8ey3g
    @user-ys4ky8ey3g 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Такое бездорожье, аж страшно становиться за драйверов.

  • @fadjarroosdianto6079
    @fadjarroosdianto6079 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    First challenge shows what a sway bar use for...

  • @alvarot6058
    @alvarot6058 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video.

  • @DRONESVU
    @DRONESVU 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    those good looking jeep!

  • @user-jt8xw6fd1v
    @user-jt8xw6fd1v 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great comparison!

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you :-)

  • @webersteve1547
    @webersteve1547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Of course the Rubicon is better but the Sahara holds up very well

  • @hadialgareshah9680
    @hadialgareshah9680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you very much for this video. I was looking for a months for something similar to this so I can decide which one of them. Thanks again

  • @herbertmischel3165
    @herbertmischel3165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    After much debating, I ended up buying a Sahara 4xe. I test drove every jeep out there except the 392. Regular, diesel, lifted, stock, 6 speeds, Willys, sports etc. By far - the most fun to drive on the road was the Sahara 4xe. The battery locations in the center kept the ride very smooth on the streets - where I do 90% of my driving. The smaller tires and lower frame had us hitting 0-60 in about 6 seconds and cornering better than a jeep is supposed to- that is a lot of fun.. With the add-ons that I have - matching colored hard tops and fenders, keyless entry, front camera, blind spot detection, cold weather package, towing package and more this is a 56K jeep. The exact addons for the Rubicon bring it to 64K. To rock climb the Rubicon trail you are going to need to lift both cars and add larger tires. The extra 9k wasn't worth it for me at this time. For a lot less than 9K I can purchase front sway bar disconnects, front skid plate and ox lockers. But I probably never will.
    But I could.

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      good choice, i think. :)

  • @point4894
    @point4894 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Супер видео! А на 0:36 у рубикона передний стабилизатор отключен, или это с включенным такая артикуляция уже?

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Sway Bar" was ON, so the front wheel could go this low.

  • @eliasdlga
    @eliasdlga 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Of course the rubicon is the best.. but I would take the sahara for daily driving.

    • @michaelsmith9308
      @michaelsmith9308 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would take the Rubicon and change the tires to the Sahara treads for street driving, easy peasy:)

    • @svaeon
      @svaeon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelsmith9308 Nailed :))

  • @user-jt8xw6fd1v
    @user-jt8xw6fd1v 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This shows how handicapped the regular version is in some offroad scenarios. It will send all power to the wheels that has zero traction when you actually want the exact opposite. This is because it is focused at onroad use and do not have loackable diffs like the Rubicon, which is offroad focused.

  • @TV-it6gs
    @TV-it6gs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:04 ,牌照架,为什么不移到一边?就像发现4

  • @jmarqukismj
    @jmarqukismj 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tires play a big part

  • @quaymcquitter8386
    @quaymcquitter8386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The tires are the only factor in this challenge they both have same engine and power but the Sahara has those daily driver tires on vs the rubicon’s off road tires

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey man, it's not only about tires. There are a lot of more things, that are different.

    • @brutusdior1550
      @brutusdior1550 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Suspension is the biggest difference

    • @blackgenesis7472
      @blackgenesis7472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DrivingCars
      Rubicon only has advantage for slow rock crawling. Mild to medium offloading other trims will do just fine.

  • @cuen_recon6662
    @cuen_recon6662 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why that rubicon has the front fenders like the sport?

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't know. You should ask at Jeep :)

  • @atvman1014
    @atvman1014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like they are both equal

  • @user-ht5eu2gf4g
    @user-ht5eu2gf4g 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I want one of this 😭

  • @cristianfl77
    @cristianfl77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is 2.0 turbo or 2.2 diésel?

  • @karlstolz
    @karlstolz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where ist that place? Is it free for drive? Legal?

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hummer centrum near Prague. It's official off-road area, but you have to pay for your driving.

    • @karlstolz
      @karlstolz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DrivingCars Ok, thank you!

  • @tribaljr
    @tribaljr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did they disconnect sway bar on the Sahara

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, you can't do that in Sahara

    • @blackgenesis7472
      @blackgenesis7472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@DrivingCars
      You can, you just have to unbolt swaybar link. Easy and quick to do it, but not as convenient as electronic.

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blackgenesis7472 Of course you can do that, but not like in the Rubicon. I think the question is if it's as easy as in rubicon. And no, it isn't.

    • @PurelifeSimplelife
      @PurelifeSimplelife 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@blackgenesis7472 no, the question is pretty clear and you answered it wrong.

  • @flybabyw6550
    @flybabyw6550 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like you did not disconnect the sway bar on the Sahara to me. The Sahara has much more articulation than that on the front end. Or, you should have not disconnected the sway bar on the Rubicon. Plus it looks as if you purposely stopped the Sahara right on the edge of the gravel hill just before the gravel hoping it would slip more with the street tires. The Rubicon you did not stop at all but kept original pace. Other than tire difference, good video.

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't operate the sway bar on Sahara, only on the Rubicon.

  • @point4894
    @point4894 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Не нравится главным образом в модели то, что в 5 дверной версии слишком уж длинная база и угол рампы плохой. У нового Бронко оптимальнее сделано, к примеру.
    А 3 дверный слишком непрактично сделан в том плане, что переднее сиденье не складывается спинкой вперед, и назад его не разложить в ровную со сложенным задним сиденьем, как у Джимни, в итоге в машине только сидеть - лежать в нем не получится. Не понимаю, почему так непродумали это.

    • @slava4792
      @slava4792 ปีที่แล้ว

      В чём проблема? Если вы едете в путешествие на несколько тысяч км,то уберите задние сиденья в коротыше совсем и у вас будет прекрасное спальное место и багажное отделение! Длинная база(не такая уж она и длинная) позволяет езду с комфортом,трясёт гораздо меньше,чем в коротыше,да и угол въезда и выезда с рампы хороший,вам же не по говнам ездить!

    • @point4894
      @point4894 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slava4792 а переднее куда?

    • @slava4792
      @slava4792 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@point4894 Оставь на месте!

    • @point4894
      @point4894 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slava4792 по длине места тогда нет

  • @ariaa8692
    @ariaa8692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One is a cat and the other is a dog! 😂

  • @adammuther5179
    @adammuther5179 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'll put my 89 Sahara against that Rubicon any day of the week. And twice on Sunday.

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      congrats! :)

  • @spy9000
    @spy9000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    see.. 7:28 is what i wanna do with my wrangler

    • @DrivingCars
      @DrivingCars  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And why you don't do it? :-)

  • @grooman2045
    @grooman2045 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🥱😴🥱😴🥱😴🥱😴