Molecular Orbital (MO) Diagram for O2(-)

[@tigerlilies5164]

That "bye" at the end sent me lol

[@LynnSaab-q1k]

thanks it took me so long to find someone who actually explains it well

[@jazminezabala7941]

When he says "out" I can tell he's canadian, and I love it.

[@donuksmurfette]

@Oakley Christopher stop scamming ppl

[@swayam2702]

Just for anyone wondering about the magnetic nature. It's paramagnetic in nature.

[@LimerentRiposter]

yeah... but how do the 1s orbitals "overlap"? What does it mean? I thought only valence electrons bond and are shared. are the 1s orbitals bonding?
Also, what the heck are antibonding orbitals? All I've figured is that it's a state that electrons get into when they're excited with energy, so how do electrons in the 1s orbitals get into antibonding after the atoms simply bond?
(Yes, I've tried to research it in books, articles and videos, but either it wasn't close to my question or it used some freaky quantum physics equations)

[@krishu_s_]

Dude this is probably the best explanation of this topic on youtube thanks

[@Gautam_jangir]

Thanks a lot dear sir 🎉 you are a great teacher 🙏🏻😊.....

[@innate-videos]

great description thank you

[@SreenathSande-k3i]

Thank you thank you soo much love show with me

[@barakah08]

It would be 8 electrons because it's valence electrons + core electrons right?

[@jamiek8603]

yh, core electrons fill out 1s and then valence fill out 2s and 2p

[@goldenglow05]

thank you so much sir it helped me allot

[@ItsKeshini]

omg thank you so much..i never understood this but now i can say i do..thank you so much again for this amazing explanation.

[@nmst14techtelugu21]

Super explanation...so tricky... thanks a lot

[@empirenow6068]

Oxygen brings 6 valence electrons not 8. It’s not a noble gas.

[@cam_al7418]

I believe they say 8 because he includes the 1s electrons, the valence for Oxygen is 6 but since the MO includes 1s, 2s, and 2p you have to add the 1s electrons to the mix. You are correct though in saying Oxygen has 6 valence electrons, but it does have 8 total electrons

[@kotasatyanandasatyananda9276]

fsyoooo9 college 90feet

[@SelenatorsPalace]

oxygen's total no. Of electrons is 8

[@mehakpreetkaur7902]

Well atomic oxygen (O) has an atomic no. (the total no. of electrons present) = 8 ... Therefore O2 has an atomic no. of 16...Here we don't see the valence electrons we see the atomic no. in order to draw molecular orbital diagram...

[@Daily_day_creative.]

It is correct

[@gjlmotea]

why O2 => 17? 8 + 8 + 1
I don't know why plus 1?

[@Zukinoame]

because the given is O2^-, it has one more electron counted due to the negative charge.

[@gjlmotea]

@@Zukinoame Oh! thnak you!

[@magn8195]

Could you go through heteronuclear diatomics and triatomic MO diagrams?

[@ishchetsia7074]

Good explanation

[@SCBROLY07]

Good work bro !!🔥

[@najim17270]

Then what about the no: of bonds?

[@ko.hectorr]

I don’t get why it’s pi

[@Khushi-q4m6z]

But bond order will be 2 right?

[@Life_with_Isaac]

No. This isn't O2, it is O2-

[@nirojbanik]

Thank you very much

[@moonjinslittleearth7126]

thanks for explain

[@nehamodi5990]

Thankssss😁

[@anadisimone]

thank you!

[@nahomdesta1237]

So wt kinda bond is in between the two oxygen....I mean is it single, double...??!! As I know, we can determine the type of bonds bases on the bond orders but here, the bond order is one and a half and we have no bond as such so can u elaborate on that........
I mean for instance the bond order of an ordinary oxygen molecule is 2 and indeed it has a double bond in between so how can we determine O2- bond

[@chemistNATE]

in THIS case, because it is a diatomic particle, a 1.5 bond order means the particle is not stable and no binding actually takes place.

[@nahomdesta1237]

@@chemistNATE owk thx a lot man, so helpful 👍

[@Gautam_jangir]

Thank you sir 😊​@@chemistNATE

[@Tarangverma-o9k]

It has 10 bonding electron

[@areebashah7006]

super easy ....thanks !!!

[@gajabathiarjuntg8215]

This is wrong because the bond order for o2 is 2

[@Life_with_Isaac]

It's correct. This isn't a diagram for O2, it is a diagram for O2-. Which does indeed have a bond order of 1.5. Don't be so ignorant.

[@sassy_slug]

wrong again gajabathiarjuntg8215 🤦

[@Learningsite123]

Good

[@rodm8113]

Thanks for posting this. My university should hire you to be my chem professor instead

[@coughfee1416]

Thanks : ]

[@tiktoklikeapp]

Nice👌

[@EquipteHarry]

Perez Edward Brown Sharon Rodriguez Mark

[@prashanthns54321]

Great video

[@akashff9169]

So cool

[@anuragroy897]

Ok

[@sadhanakashyap2104]

धन्यवाद।।

[@preeti-ul1wv]

Thanks sir 🇮🇳

[@vamsivemula6184]

Great sir

[@malekamaleka3927]

This is not useful for studying the MOEB Diagram

[@yitong9849]

actually molecule bonds have nothing to do with atomic bonds？

[@amazingvideos4213]

Bond order of oxygen is 2 not 1.5

[@malarkey3980]

It's a negatively charged Oxygen. this video makes sense because the addition of the extra electron would give rise to more instability, making the species more reactive and thus, reducing the bond order in this particular example.

[@PraagySharma]

O2-

[@Life_with_Isaac]

This isn't a diagram for O2, it is a diagram for O2-. Which does indeed have a bond order of 1.5. Don't be so ignorant.

[@ajit5173]

Which country to you belong 😅

[@K.lona4life]

F i

[@joshuapolin9039]

Still confused

[@milarbrook9735]

This is so wrong 😏😏😏😏😏

[@keshavm9]

How ?

[@malekamaleka3927]

This is not useful for studying the MOEB Diagram