Only because they didn't maintain them well and didn't get the updated software packages. The Royal New Zealand Air Force and many others run them very well, with excellent servicability and reliability.
No. They retired them because they wanted American. They took advantage of a crash (of human cause) of an Nh90 to criticize it and replace the entire fleet with Black Hawks. In the same way that they canceled the French submarine contract to take American ones. Good doggies. Besides, they didn't even wanted to sell their Nh90 or even give them. No, they destroyed and buried them (they were new)
Hello Airbus, it obviously makes no sense, to ask something, because I read the commentaries here... Maybe you edit another video, handling these prejudices by offering actual facts ? What went better ?
Subs have torpedo tube launched anti air missiles. They hear a helicopter before it can lower its sonar and detect the sub. The helicopter will never know what hit him.
Massive crap, retired after 5 years with nothing but trouble for the Norwegian Navy Coastguard. Will be raplaced by OLD (but still way better) Seahawks! Sayonara Airbus!
Yeah the Australians 🤣 known for their worst maintainace policies for military hardware ☠️, they literally have problems with anything which isn't American @@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617
![[FR] L'Airbus RACER le nouvel Hélicoptère Girodyne d'Airbus. Premier vol d'essai.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NOLrIF7yPz0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[FR] L'Airbus RACER le nouvel Hélicoptère Girodyne d'Airbus. Premier vol d'essai.](/img/tr.png)
Didn't Australia retire all of their NH90s because they were so unreliable?
Norway did that too
And Belgium
Only because they didn't maintain them well and didn't get the updated software packages. The Royal New Zealand Air Force and many others run them very well, with excellent servicability and reliability.
No. They retired them because they wanted American. They took advantage of a crash (of human cause) of an Nh90 to criticize it and replace the entire fleet with Black Hawks. In the same way that they canceled the French submarine contract to take American ones. Good doggies.
Besides, they didn't even wanted to sell their Nh90 or even give them. No, they destroyed and buried them (they were new)
@vavane2247 Then, if they were perfectly fine as you claim, why didn't they sell them instead of destroying them?
For people with no Educational Background:
1.55% of Fatalities over numbers built for NH90
2.85% of Fatalities over numbers built for Black Hawk
People with "No educational background" including youself I guess. How much of both aircraft were built since it's first flight and do your math again
@@Matt0ize Thanks Einstein. Go hiking.
"Aiight, boys. We know where the sub's at. Let's take this 500 pound fish back to base."
So you're saying that the NH-90 is no longer a hangar queen, right?😅
Hello Airbus, it obviously makes no sense, to ask something, because I read the commentaries here... Maybe you edit another video, handling these prejudices by offering actual facts ? What went better ?
Always the best !!!!
가장 가격 경쟁력을 가지는 국가에서 생산하는 시스템을 만드는게 성공의 비결은 아닐지?
분명 스팩은 최고의 중형 헬기
What’s the difference to other nh90
Torpedos are not very useful in forest or désert.
@@raphael7552 the naval versions of the nl
Norway army sent back to airbus this helicopters?
👌
Instructif
$100M weapon system to kill a $1B submarine
Sweden will most likely replace these due to high cost.
Furthermore: Is anything I said untrue?
Compro o projeto e a tecnologia para o governo do Brasil para a helibras
Compro 2.000 unidades para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
Subs have torpedo tube launched anti air missiles. They hear a helicopter before it can lower its sonar and detect the sub. The helicopter will never know what hit him.
Man, I knew they should've asked defense expert ecki74 first, how foolish of them to not consult TH-cam commenters before developing a new aircraft.
It’s an arms race. No need to be cynical. 😘
Ahh yeah a TH-cam commenter knows more then actual experts ☠️
Massive crap, retired after 5 years with nothing but trouble for the Norwegian Navy Coastguard. Will be raplaced by OLD (but still way better) Seahawks! Sayonara Airbus!
Mal gucken ob der genauso zuverlässig ist wie der SeaLion. Nämlich überhaupt nicht
Trying to get more uses out of that embarrassment of an aircraft?
Always, like the osprey
@@Clickworker101 that's not just embarrassing it's dangerous!
Its pretty good aircraft if not one of the best. Expensive so not every poor nation can purchase it. Mine has.
@@PavulonWielki it is that bad even the Australians had to take it out of serivce after just 10 years because it was so bad and unreliable to boot!
Yeah the Australians 🤣 known for their worst maintainace policies for military hardware ☠️, they literally have problems with anything which isn't American @@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617
Mejor el MH-60 R 😂
Flying lemon/Maintenance hog
Retired in some EU countries... many issues... 😂😂😂
Expensive and useless European scrap.Don't fall in this fake video trap. The U.S Blackhawks and seahawks helicopter variants better value for money.