Hidden Realities: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos, Dr. Brian Greene, Columbia
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2018
- 'Physicists are now in the worst possible position imaginable as regards the prediction of the actual universe from the possible universes at the beginning, at the Big Bang.'
In recent years, a growing body of work based on a broad spectrum of ideas from quantum mechanics, cosmology, and string theory has been steadily converging around a proposal that our universe is actually only one of many universes. In fact, research supports a number of different models of parallel universes in which our world appears: for instance, as one of many ‘bubbles’ in a rapidly growing bath of universes, or as one of numerous cosmic slabs separated from one another through additional spatial dimensions. In this presentation, Greene, with his trademark impartiality, crystal-clear prose, and inspired use of analogy, opens up the strange worlds of the "multiverse," taking us on a journey grounded firmly in science, and limited only by our imagination. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
my left ear must be in another dimension
I stg thought my left headphone is done
so annoying
The volume is not very high. Can not hear him very well.
Same here 🤪🤣
Lmao
This is one of the most well done lectures for a general audience I've seen in a long time. The audience in Portland seems uncommonly up on their physics.
But not much up to thinking.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
Dr Greene loves what he does so much. One can't help to feel the excitement. He is such a great teacher. If I had teacher(s) like him? I may have. ??????? I can certainly appreciate Professor Greene today. TY Dr Greene.
He is a joy to listen to
@@bicstic8 👍 He really makes his lesson(s) enjoyable to listen to.
The man is amazing no notes everything is extemporaneous
Because he likes to make things up as he goes along and then people are wowed by this simpleton.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
My right ear loved this
@@Itsanameforachannel he said dose
One dose for each, though now my left one was left as underdosed
i thought my headphones were fucked
@@Itsanameforachannel that's our robot ear.
@@elessarstrider5210 more of a prime directive that doesn't discriminate on the consciousness level of the individual.Agreed that this is dangerous for children and impaired and should have a mute button.
Now my right ear knows much much more about universe than my left one
Pratik Raut doesnt matter on a iPhone
Omg I was listening to this in my car and I’m pretty naked, I kept trying to pop my ears lol
Well, in a parallel universe your left ear knows much more about that universe... Some day Apple will hire some quantum physicists to entangle AirPods across universes and achieve multiversal stereo sound
I meant baked. Not naked. I wasn’t naked in my car lol
@@samanthamorgan8117 LoL I was thinking about it. Why did you use Naked word something like that 😂
Brian Greene is one of the best public speakers i have seen. He's so enthusiastic about his subject, he never stumbles with his words and he's very engaging.
And because he is so great he also didn't teach you one real thing about physics. That would have taken a more precise, more pedantic, less personable teacher and it would have required that you actually care to lean something rather than just being entertained. :-)
@@lepidoptera9337 Fair point ,but, some people (like me) are started off by Brian's engaging personality and , then realise/focus on, how interesting the subject matter is.
@@kenadams5504 Which has brought you to the physics library where you have systematically read theory books on classical mechanics, electromagnetism, special relativity, general relativity, quantum mechanics and quantum field theory and in parallel phenomenology books on atomic and molecular physics, nuclear physics, solid state physics, magnetism, optics, astronomy, cosmology and high energy physics. Sure kid. Have a cookie. ;-)
@@lepidoptera9337 if you don't like Brian .....why did you click on his video ?
@@kenadams5504 Because a lot of intellectually lazy kids are here who need to be dressed down a bit. ;-)
I loved the interaction with the kid towards the end :)
"Have you ever used a video camera?" "No." "Great. You're hired."
Right! 😂
Excellent, excellent, excellent. A most enjoyable talk.
It feels like my ear is perforated listening to this video because the audio is only in one channel. Thanks anyway.
What a great story teller. He could be an award winning science fiction writer along with Michio Kaku.
Being slow in the brain must suck, be well
These kids are amazing! Their understanding, courage to ask questions to such a great man of science. Defenitely great future for US!
He's NO great man of science since he ignores what it points to.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
What makes a " man " great?
Thanks for this wonderful presentation.... It's always great to listen Dr . Brian Greene... Thanks once again for bringing in public...
u a scientist????
Extraordinary.. thank you doctor
Oh man, this is insanely trippy when stoned
Ofc very deep all the time :D
I have seen a lot of his lectures through the years but....this may be the best.
In the end, when he fields what seem like nonsensical questions with such vigor...just perfect.
He anticipates the questions because they are trying to understand what he is putting forth in traditional intuitive mechanics.
There is little intuitive about going past the dimensions we observe.
He's not trying to understand, he's putting on a show that suckers buy into, is all.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
This man is such a great educator he explains such complex ideas so well.....one of the greats...thank you for posting this.
@@BradWatsonMiami Oh boy....there are places you can go for help....it's called school...
@@vMaxHeadroom: I attended 7 colleges (4 locally) and taught at an 8th. How about you? Help me with 'The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory'. What did I get wrong?
See GOD=7_4 Theory at GOD704.fandom.com . Atheists hate that - they never imagined that someone could come up with a very simple scientific, mathematical, historic, linguistic, comparative religion, musicial...proof of GOD & God-incarnate.
The QA was super interesting around 1:17:00 - 1:23:00
What a remarkable young man. He brings great joy to my life.
Man I sure hope that my parallel self in another universe didn’t marry my first wife!
Woah just sad
every possible situation exists............but while conscious in another self someday in another universe (maybe after we die in this life) you will be unaware of any of this existence and what happened here...................(unless someday we can entangle information beyond an existing universe to carry previous universe history into the next but that is nothing but mind blowing speculation at this point).............so just hope you if you become conscious in the next universe its one where you never even meet her..........LOL
I woke up this morning with the "quantum jitters" but a shot of Jack Daniels soon put me right.
Thank you so much, Mr. Greene
B Green is really a national treasure. I love how he allows the rest of us to partake in his joy. Thank you.
I thank GOD for allowing us to undrstand such concepts. Thanking a " scientist" is nice but really somewhat odd in my humble view.
@@leo-unddieAnderenwhat god tho?
Ironically I was listening to this with only my right ear bud cuz I was working and then put the left one in and thought my earbuds were broken 😂
He believes in fairy tales!
some day some where.. some one will get the damn audio rite on these things.... WOW... i dont understand how they dont get it...
It seems like the more important the topic you want to hear, from the person you want to hear from, the more the clipped the audio becomes. I brought this up once before, and only one other guy got it. I can't take that! I shut it right off. DeGrasse Tyson is one whose audio is always clipped. Maybe they take him more seriously?
Dont worry... They got it right in another universe 😆
@@rocky7895 lol
I see Dr. Brian Greene, I click. Simple as that
Sounds like a full-time job
You might need to get that looked at.... 😳
For a moment I was set back that my phone malfunctioned as my earphones were new and I thought I would had to get a new phone😂😂😂
Excellent. Only wish had a better sound quality 😊😊
Here's a very strange notion. Is there a useful experiment that would need the cooperation of someone in another universe also doing a similar experiment? If so, could we proceed with that experiment and assume our counterparts in that universe have already thought the same thing, thereby eventually proving each other exist?
interesting.
Can't even imagine the intelligence gap between myself and these couple kids that questioned , when on my age, growing with a model of the world so much wider and so different than I did 40 years ago.
Awesome lecture
As usual amazing talk from Dr Greene. As awesome as the theory of inflationary cosmology is, many prominent physicist does not agree with that theory including one of the greatest mind of the 20th century and 2020 Physics Nobel Laureate Sir Roger Penrose. He famously said when he first saw the proposal, he felt ill. LOL
If particals do replicate eventually in space then it should also on earth right
Could this explain the look a likes?
Of so many people that have been found?
If so could this consequently help the argument it beeing treu in total?
Muchas gracias por tan lindo contenido.
Brian Green is fantastic thankyou for this .
I believe your extra universe is more likely the regions indicated by your previous string theory discussions of extra dimensions but those small bits of extra dimensions are connected in some way. Also, the idea of length & size is distorted. This would explain quantum entanglement & how light is both a wave & a particle. Trying to explain these things & dark matter require extra-dimensional interaction to be included.
Awesome presentation!
Not at all; Greene is a joke.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
Audio on right channel only. :-(
Good lecture.
So I can stop testing my earbuds and changing settings since you verified no left audio, thank you
its fine to crank the volume all the way to 100....until one of the TH-cam commercial plays in the middle of the video (EAR DRUMS ARE THEN BLOWN!).
I just upgraded to Premium - oh my word, what an incredible pleasure! I leave TH-cam on all night to help sleep. Between the commercials blasting me awake and my previous hopeless WiFi provider, it was a gnashing of teeth affair 😎😎
I can easily believe everything he said has to be true and here's why I believe this has to be COMPLETELY accurate ( even though I cant possibly explain it correctly but FEEL it ) .. i lost my deeply loved dog recently to bone cancer the grief was so painful and deep i would cry myself to sleep until one night I had this incredible dream that was so vivid so realistic and so detailed that I woke up totally confused as to where I was and what had just happened in my DREAM or what felt like MORE and closer to an actual PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE that was with me and me boy Junior who had been with me in this place that I recognized as HOME as the same location I live in but it was TOTALLY DIFFERENT . It was my town just arranged completely different yet I was still home walking my sweet dog just him and I and we walked thru a park we used to go to but it was DIFFERENT and then saw a dog just like him accross the street and he got excited to see this other dog and they ran out to each other and I was terrified they would fight but they didn't because turns out it was one if his 11 littermates, a sister and they immediatly began to rejoice at the REUNION and the other dog my digs sister was with a man who just stood and im not sure but I think I the man was my brother who died and had come to take my dog back with him to this OTHER PLACE WITH THEM and I remember watching my boy leave with the other dog and the man I felt was my brother and I just had to cry with both happiness at the sight of my dog young healthy happy and playing running happy to be with his sister again and as they left with that man who brought the other dog to get my boy and take him back. I cried both with joy and also regret knowing I would NEVER see my dog again until i die and that was months ago when up to that moment i had had many dreams of my dog weird nonsensical broken little dreams that didn't make sense after he died up until I had this one unique EXPERIENCE and since that one I have never had even one tiny shred of a dream about him or my brother not ONE so its for this reason that I cant help but think was much more than a dream because it felt like something else something you just don't understand yet cant deny was way way more and leaves you KNOWING what you cant possibly know unless you experience it that it was so intense so realistic so COMFORTING and so detailed in ways no dream could ever have accomplished i believe 100% that there is a parralel world very much like this one but we can't see until we die when we die our energy does not end it goes somewhere and there must be a dimension another univers one like our universe but different one where we go after we die and call me crazy call it wishful thinking or grieving or delusion I DONT CARE I know that what I experienced in my sleep state HAPPENED ill never forget it that I was able to get a glimpse of another reality and my dog and my brother and all those no longer here will be found there i hope And maybe we will find out how to go there by will and that science is getting closer and closer to understanding the truth about it all including the possibility we may CROSS OVER when we die in this reality only to be able to live in the next one.
So your dreams led you to truth? Not for me, I go by sufficient evidence.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
Need some volume please.
I have no sound , what to do? Help please
"Theories which are difficult to disprove"
Physics SAD state today. PERFECT for the Greenes of "science"
Excellent thanks. Very truth.
If dark energy number is
0.0000.........1385 or0.000000...139 will that kind of universe exist?
If yes then between 138 to 139 infinite number are there
Or the energy can change in plank measure?
Brought to us in glorious low one channel audio! I had to stop watching it, wasn't going to pay that amount attention to what I could barely hear.
Ok bye
why is the string as small as the planck lenght?
At about 8:20 into the lecture, professor Greene says that the light from the distant object would take about 14 billion light years to reach us, as the universe was created about fourteen billion years ago.
Doesn't this assume that the objects are receding at the speed of light? Wherefrom do we assume this notion? Must I be missing some vital piece? Please illuminate.
Because light travels at one light year every year. So in the age of the universe, 14 billion years give or take, light that shone from 15 billion lighr years away won't get here for another billion years. Light that started out 14 billion light years away has been traveling for 14 billion years and is now just reaching us.
Why is the video so fuzzy and only one channel of sound.
What if there is something at the end of the universe that is pulling galaxies toward it?
The end is frequency, vibrations in various ways creates frequency, the one thing in common to every universe, dimensions, ever known object. So frequency was the beginning. Everything can be done in frequency.
Camera guy drunk. 🤣
I love this talk but am stuck on the initial premise- that there are a finite number of particles- and thus that predicts that there must be multiverses. How in the world could such a premise be made when we know the one sure thing about our Universe is that it is expanding? This is like saying that we will always replicate ourselves eventually because there are a finite number of people. There are not. Going to keep watching- but this is sort of blowing the rest of the talk for me!
Depends on what you mean by particles? The quantum fields we have observed below 1TeV? Yes, that's a finite number, but they would not be the same in a different universe in these models. The structure of the physical vacuum would be different. The problem with these models is that they are unobservable. I would not pay them too much attention. They are basically just string theory looking for an application.
11:00 just like what The OA says #savetheOA
Well, now, don't you tell me to smile
You stick around I'll make it worth your while
Like numbers beyond what you can dial
Maybe it's because we're so versatile
Can hardly hear it and volume is all the way up. Too bad.
Lol good to know others have the same problem. I thought I was losing my hearing.
Ok on Amazon Kindle HD 10. Check your volume controls
While I think he handled the questions from the kids really well, I think he really gave one question short shrift. If there is an infinite number of universes, and if each of those universes can have different dimensions that give rise to different constants, and if this applies to c or something like it, then there are in fact an infinite number of universes with the potential to 'catch up' to ours, in which case there is also an infinite number of 'detonator' universes, meaning it's a statistical certainty that our universe could have been or would be destroyed or at least give rise to paradoxes like she also mentioned. Since this hasn't happened, there's a flaw in at least one of the premises.
Since Greene is some nitwit that pretends to think, why do people take him seriously as if he really is out searching for answers?
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
huh?
@@leo-unddieAnderen Premise A: Infinite universes exist
Premise B: Our universe exists within this infinite set
Premise C: Universes may have different laws that govern their existence
Premise D: A possible universe would have a law that would allow it to destroy our universe
Conclusion: our universe is destroyed
The conclusion is demonstrably false, so there must be at least one incorrect premise
Inflation theory needs primordial gravity waves, which would be implied by a B-mode polarization of the CMB. I don't know that it's been seen yet.
Another great question from a kid!
Excellent questions from an 8th grader!
I have indeed seen the other dimensions in a very odd way. I had a piece of paper slip into a different dimension and disappear from ours right in front of me, never ever to be seen again, despite my efforts to locate having not believed my own eyes.
Sasha Brown money...
The borrowers!
Sasha Brown u got anymore of whatever the fuck your smoking
Sasha Brown
Elaborate please??
clipping my hair above the sink, later looked for the hair to clean up, there was not one hair- it went into another realm/universe. absolute truth. just like Sasha.
gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable - now we know they are the same. Having law of physics X and everybody believing in X are indistinguishable too
Good thing my right headphone is the one that's still working
Why post videos with defective audio? Surely the original must have been better; in any case, this is ruined by the missing left channel. At very least it could have been mixed down to mono before posting. That would have made it listenable.
There's a universe where this lecture only plays in your left earbud.
Who operating the camera ? His three year old daughter ?
This person is a diceptive he have on daughter ? He now nothing in phisiques nor anything else why he is there speaking ?
Can we access some information from other universe
If ans is no then how u sure that it exist
In maths there is infinite number
Is that mean every number have some physical significance hell No
Then how we trust that anything is possible
Tell me one thing professor in ur theory what is impossible other than backward
Time travel
Stringing theory breaks down in my left ear
Could you find the edge of space is like there are thoughts you are not thinking at this moment
Somebody please give Brian the switch for the lights
The kid at the end was great haha around 1:17:00
Might be a future Brian Greene!;-)
Minus 90 straight line.
So, Strings are Planck Length?
well they cant be any bigger, or it would distort spacetime and cause mini black holes.
There was no big bang of creation. The second quantum correction in the Friedmann equation gets rid of the big-bang singularity. In otherwords, what's here has always been here.
Systems need of big bangs, small ones and all diferent sizes to me but only to get energy out of them.
Lyles Fredidog
Everything that “exists” has a beginning of the “existence”.
No one can say *how* this existence started: we are just scratching the surface of our knowledge of the universe.
Much, much more.
⌚ it plus n minus events... let's 👀
The universe is not made out of particle, it is made out of quantised fields. It may be that there are an infinite x infinite ways that these fields can be arranged which then means even if the universe is infinite you never get a the same state repeated. Being quantised is different than being a particle as there is some sense that a state is spatially distributed.
True for a 2D world of graphs. For 3D, it would be infinity x infinity x infinity, aleph 3 infinity.
hi , Dr Green
Greene is such a brilliant speaker that I wish there could be more of persons like him in universities.... Possibly the multiverse picture is right ;)
HTF did the other scientists not see what hubble seen especially Einstein 🤔☘️
When space ends whats on the outside that stop's it? The spark that started the supposed big bang.. needed space to start with... some space for it to bang.. where did that space come from?
the bang created the "space"
There are many possibilities: a previous universe, our Kline bottle universe, another brane split, a null point, accumulated strings, etc. It's an open question.
thanks to sofia
we can created universes , because , we are the universes
Thank you Dr. Green. You have also explained the Bible talking about many houses in heaven.
long 🌙 's applying energy
Reverse engineer what shape would be required to produce the vibration that the sound om makes. And that's the shape of the extra dimension. Your welcome human
Don't TELL THEM??!?!!!
An attempted straight track through the universe, “never turning the steering wheel,” there’s no telling where you’d end up. It’s called gravitational drift: GD.
Maybe you should not call them extra dimensions.they are still 3 spatial coordinates No matter the size or shape
Good for you! Don't let Greene rob your thinking.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
This was the moment Brian realized he forgot he ate 3 dried grams 3 hrs before the show 😆
He’s my hero
great discovery brian....oh ya...that was something you read
You can only see things via light via your eyes. What does it mean to see something? Can you “see” my point?
Seeing evidence is reality. Making things up like Greene does is an absurdity.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
How to measure it, even the math suggests it. It will be a philosophical issue? As far as I know, math has to be supported by observation etc like old science school. So how will et ever be proven
whats up boddy did you like my work?
i never heard of you again man¡ what do you say about my work?
If there is parrelel universe n earth in turn, how am gona be there if my mother didn't choose my father as husband..and also each decision by my ancestors were not the same which leds to me!
Don't believe what this goof says.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
These matters are clearly delineated in the Vedic scriptures, these are not new ideas. In fact they are over 5,000 years old. The Srimad Bhagavatam describes this in detail; the shape, formation, dissolution, the many many other universes.... it's all there, and I am always dumbfounded that these scientists don't at least exolore the fact that this has been explained clearly in ancient times!
Ha ha. I never get tired of that joke
Channel 69 to watch the Big Bang. Makes sense.
The big bang only makes sense to those that don't have much sense.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
It's possible that there`s a much possibilities - astrophysics today.
Greene is a joke but still people take that nitwit seriously.
---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'---
Brian Greene
Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
Shame the sound is coming only out of the right channel. :(
{:-:-:}
This guy isn't dumb. Just a thought
This dud is a diceptive ? That's the write word ... fraud if you like and more other words
You're right he's not dumb. He's a deranged little mongkey. Please delete any of this cosmic contagion from your cortex.