The Fabric of the Cosmos, Dr. Brian Greene, Columbia University
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2018
- "The realization - there’s more to the universe than we’re directly aware of - helps us appreciate our place in the cosmos."
Space and time form the very fabric of the cosmos. Yet they remain among the most mysterious of concepts. Is space an entity? Why does time have a direction? Could the universe exist without space and time? Can we travel to the past? Greene has set himself a daunting task: to explain non-intuitive, mathematical concepts like String Theory, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and Inflationary Cosmology with analogies drawn from common experience. From Newton’s unchanging realm in which space and time are absolute, to Einstein’s fluid conception of spacetime, to quantum mechanics’ entangled arena where vastly distant objects can instantaneously coordinate their behavior, Greene takes us all, regardless of our scientific backgrounds, on an irresistible and revelatory journey to the new layers of reality that modern physics has discovered lying just beneath the surface of our everyday world.
October 15, 2004 - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![พรากรัก - เต้ย อภิวัฒน์ [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ShT2ltn8GBE/mqdefault.jpg)
Brian Greene always reminds me how much I love (and suffer from the lack of) intelligent people!
starts at 6:45
Thanks man
Nearly 20 years ago and still state of the art
Brian Greene is an excellent story teller.
Wow... what a engaging lecture it is! . Great physicst of the era. DR. BRIAN GREENE ✌✌👍👍
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind". - Albert Einstein
Brian Greene is a clueless atheist and a poor scientist. He ignores a great deal of evidence of GOD and has hit a wall in string theory that only GOD=7_4 can penetrate. See GOD704.fandom.com .
What has Greene discovered? Nothing. His science is lame.
@@BradWatsonMiami ⁰knowledge of field is incomplete without that of its witness , observer or knower in context to both micro and macro , part and whole ,one and . many . According to the Bhagavat Geeta ,true knowledge constitutes the right knowlede of both field (khetra) and ( khetranjna) knower of the field in all levels of existence or reality . Their interactioñ is so meaninggul that evolution of life not only is initiated but also consumated in principle through replication and self realization
Thanks prof Brian Green. The sequential analysis is really commendable
Like establishing right sequence of our double helix chromosom oneday it may explain simply the genesis of our reality
Isn't he a wonderful explainer of it all, big fan of Green!
How does this not even have 100k veiws. Such a great and well layed out presentation
Today , it has 148 ,000 views.
What a beautiful presentation. I admire Prof. Greene. Thank you sir.
The clarity and power of simplification of this man are amazing.
A man whom I could listen for whole life.
Who you may listen to. 🧐
@@levigoldwing1536 p
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind". - Albert Einstein
Brian Greene is a clueless atheist and a poor scientist. He ignores a great deal of evidence of GOD and has hit a wall in string theory that only GOD=7_4 can penetrate. See GOD704.fandom.com .
What has Greene discovered? Nothing. His science is lame.
Agreed
@@degaussingatmosphericcharg575 no that's not true there are many proofs of God, for eg. If gravitational force was just a bit stronger then matter wouldn't had been formed and if a bit weaker matter wouldn't had been formed. If strong nuclear force would've been a bit weaker atomic nuclei would neved had been formed and there are tons of reasons that this beautiful universe is created by someone. Brian Greene is a genius the above man is literally lame, Brian Greene has found mirror symmetry of string theory, and calabi yau maths, and he is also the reason for my motivation in science, but his belief on god is his choice. Even I am a bit skeptic for God and maybe anthropic principle is the reality but maybe God is there, who knows?
quite good lecture
our understanding of universe is based on the physical laws but the quantum particle does not seems to follow them so how the universe can depend on these laws if the basic building blocks does not follow them.
What causes the string to vibrate. And what would happen if it stopped vibrating??
What a great physicist is Sir Brian Greene ..
Quantum Entanglement is so spooky that it surely must be a key to unlocking the next layer of Reality.
This is an example of the kind of unnatural speculation Brian Greene's genius with analogy often engenders in nurses & brick-layers, actresses & bus-drivers. He is perhaps the greatest theoretical intellect of my generation because he switches others ON.
Brian Green is a Saint
Skip to 06:56.
I love watching Brian's hands while he talks! 😂
I play this at night while kids sleep because THEY are the ones who will take it further.
I used to play his Nova documentary The Elegant Universe to my daughter to help her sleep at night. Happy memories. :) It's a little different from what my mom played for me as a child at night...which was someone reading Bible verses lol. :P
I am reading his book, Fabric of cosmos. Difficult for me to understand, but interesting theme. thanks to these videos my understandment has becoming easiest.
Would you recommend it? Never read it!
Proud to be from Oregon!Great talk as always Dr Greene, thank you to all.
amazing lecture
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind". - Albert Einstein
Brian Greene is a clueless atheist and a poor scientist. He ignores a great deal of evidence of GOD and has hit a wall in string theory that only GOD=7_4 can penetrate. See GOD704.fandom.com .
What has Greene discovered? Nothing. His science is lame.
Thanks for a great talk. As to the man questioning the veracity of language in describing modern physics: language is a system. All systems are finite by definition. That means that there will be things outside its 'wheelhouse'. I doubt you could describe your favorite painting well enough for me to picture it in my mind anything like you see it. Oh, I might get a feel for colors, composition, & such, and I might even catch some glimpse of what it means to you. But I'd really have to see it for myself; something you'd almost certainly be quick to tell me. But science communicators - especially those who are actually practicing scientists - have not only words, but pictures, as well as math at their own disposal. Plus the fact that as scientists, they've 'seen it for themselves'. They do their best to share all that with us, but it's not easy! There is some truth in saying that areas of modern science - particularly particle physics and cosmology - have become increasingly abstract, and that makes a science communicator's job all the harder. There's also the jargon barrier. All organized institutions have at least a bit of their own language; terms that only apply to their specialty. Parsec is good example from cosmology. The light year that we're familiar with is not something cosmologists often use among themselves. They use the parsec. They also all use metrics; even here in North America (except when NASA forgets!) So there are plenty of challenges to keep an honest science communicator busy! Thanks again. tavi.
ç ç
i. çü.
i. i. ç.
üç. ü. i. i.
ü ü
i
ç.
ç ü.
ü. ü. i
ç. i.
i.
iü
i. ü. ç. i. ₺.
ç. i
ü. Çü
i
i.
ü. ç i ç. ç
ç. ç. i. ü. ü. ç. ç.
i.
😮.
ş ç ü . ç.
i. ü ç ü ç
,
ü ş
ü
i. i.
i ,
i.
it occurs to me that the vast majority of science lectures deal mostly the with history of the great men, and, sadly to a much lesser extent , the great women who "invented" and toiled in the development of all the great ideas we hear about today, A hundred years from now, what stories will lecturers be telling about this epoch? Who will be the characters alive and working today that will be the protagonists populating the great science stories told to enthralled audiences the world over?
Agreed 👍. They missing a certain key points. And don't give space for women sciencetists to come forth.
Nothing would be said at all🙄
Brian You are genius man !
Is gravitational force actin' upwards 🤔,or both sides??
Stability of balls and the sun. They're not changing directons and movements outside of the pattern but circulating only.what cause they circulation,stability?
The numbers are nothing more than the stimulation running perfectly!
Genius!!
Some Scientists have calculated the tensile strength of a single String in respect to String Theory. If you ask that particular Man who have done these calculations to explain how he Imagines Space, Time and Gravitational Effect, because that's what it's all about, I believe you will get a rather unexpected answer, but probably the most close one to the Reality of the Cosmos.
At 57:00 Brian amplifies the "antnalogy." :)
What would happen to an entangled particle if the particle that it was entangled with went into a black hole?
Negative charge particle is goes into the black hole. And positive will get rid of it by using its energy . In t he form of hawking radiation. And that negative partner is responsible for perishment of black hole. With its negative energy.
Negative partner is goes into the black hole. And positive one is get rid of it in the form of hawking radiation. But negative partner is responsible for perishment of black hole.
Any particular energy, particle or otherwise is stripped of it's information . Regarding quantum entanglement, it is believed through the containment of information that the particle is always present in the black hole including it's entangled particle should it be within the Schwarzchild Radius, or Beyond the Event Horizon. Since no energy is known to escape any black holes in our known universe, it is forever encapsulated within the black hole. Moreover, in theory, entangled particles will release energy in the form of Hawking Radiation. Note that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. This is important because it implies that in some form energy absorbed by a black hole should in theory be released. Quantum Physics is more Grey then Black or White. There is more we don't know in the quantum world then anything else. Essential Particles, Quarks and Neutrinos in theory and in experiments violate the Laws of Physics.
God sake. You're an amazing speaker Brian and dont you look so young. Lol. Father time will catch eventually. You still look good for a 50 odd year old. Cheers for the talk.
That's not Father Time.It's sun exposure.
The last question is the best ahaha :D
I'm skeptical about his scenario in which 2 people have different times on their watches because they have traveled at different rates. Traveling is only done relative to other objects. If someone travels at the speed of light relative to someone else, the person he is traveling at the speed of light relative to is traveling at the speed of light relative to him. Wouldn't their perception of time be identical?
They do have different times. Look up "time dilation"
Also, time is affected by gravity. It's different on earth compared to satellites in space.
Their distance/speed is measured relative to their shared starting point.
Why are all the best videos on You Tube nearly 20 years old? :(
{:o:O:}
Brian Green what a legend
00:06:53
To bypass the TWO Interminable Introductions of Tedium!
{:o:O:}
😀👍
String Theory? Oh, I know. The Cats Cradle.
Give that last kid a harvard scholarship.
7:00
Therefore as per perturbation theory the universe shouldn't even exist?
For else we wouldn’t be here
Science aways amazed me, religion, on the other hand, drove me depressed and manipulated by narcissists. Science omnia vincit.
enjoyable and interesting but still a theory ?
Can’t we make planets move in rectangular path around sun?
Orbiting planets are comparable to a marble orbiting a bowling ball in the centre of a stretched trampoline .The planets and marble follow the stretched fabric , except the planets are following stretched Spacetime (as opposed to a trampoline).Therefore , the orbits will always be circular , not rectangular.
Dr. Greene can you do something more useful. Perhaps, reading to the elderly but not your books. Something they might enjoy. I kid of course. Big Fan!
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind". - Albert Einstein
Brian Greene is a clueless atheist and a poor scientist. He ignores a great deal of evidence of GOD and has hit a wall in string theory that only GOD=7_4 can penetrate. See GOD704.fandom.com .
What has Greene discovered? Nothing. His science is lame.
:) Good one!! But finally you got the Nobel Prize!
Book promotion ?
Hmm
Poor etiquette by the crowd who left before Q&A.
An excellent lecture but it seems so much like theory piled on theory piled on theory. I have no idea how much weight to give to these ideas
String theory seems to have hit a dead end since this lecture.
*_"theory piled on theory piled on theory."_*
The String Hypothesis is not actually a scientific theory. It cannot be tested, verified or falsified. It's theoretical idea piled on theoretical idea piled on theoretical idea, with a lot of complex mathematics.
{:o:O:}
I read somewhere recently that string theory is falling out of favor. It is no longer as popular as it once was because it has proven nothing. Only brought about a lot of what if's.
Truth is we just don't know what reality is made of. We come up with theory after theory and they try to pass them off as fact.
You’re one of those God type aren’t you
Every science fact we know of now , was at first posthulated as a theory. String theory is possibly correct because there is a lot of mathematics posthulating its credability .
Brian Green's face looks photoshopped into someone's body in the thumbnail
Are you a brother of Rhea chakroborty
@@adityajha9665 Yes. Don't tell anyone.
@@adityajha9665 😂
Lot of turtles there.
Turtles ? They are Happy together, so happy togeeeetheeeerr papa pa paaaa ...
King Nimrod all over again. . . We have had the proverbial "why" for over 4000 years. You really should read a little more. . .
With that said, Merry Chrℹ️stmas & Happy New Year❕
😁
Just because there's commonalities in bone structures among different animals does not mean they evolved from each other or our ancestors of each other. That's completely ridiculous to say that one species is an ancestor of another species.
Source innitiated the universe and all life to coexist in harmony and provide plentifully for everyone.
We come from Source Elohim.
Why bring that shit here?
You are wrong, biological evolution is a fact which has been observed. Educate yourself; look into biology. Elohim is fake.
if we play with nuclear ENERGY,,wouldn't that screw with the fabric of space .. and possibly poke holes in that fabric and tear what we know as our world,,and blow us apart??
What keeps planets moving?Gravity only pulls.
This is explained by Einstein's theory of GR. Gravity does not pull like Newton thought. Rather, the mass of the sun and all objects in space "warps" the space-time "fabric" such that smaller mass objects move around the larger objects. They technically move around the center of mass which is concentrated at the Sun but the sun does kind of wobble due to the other planets' presence. Space pushes mass. Think of it that way instead. So space is pushing on us. That's why we are stuck on Earth's surface. In fact, gravity may not be a force after all. It may be an emergent property of space itself when mass is "warping" it. Also, it may be that gravity is just an illusion. This is a pretty wild speculation but it's a byproduct of black hole physics and what happens to information around the event horizon. If you want more information, look up the holographic principle.
Planets are moving because they are made of stardust that was already moving before they formed the planets themselves. Gravity helped to give them form by accretion. As there was nothing to stop them, they kept moving so far, but not in straight line across the space. The same gravity that gave them shape, keeps the planets moving around the stars. Yes, gravity only pulls, but it doesn't eliminates the initial force given to the planets, otherwise, they all would fall on their own stars of their solar systems. Two forces imbalances each other producing a circular effect.
windbags
Wish he would leave out the politics
I was all in agreement I t you started talking about the Big Bang theory. It amazes me how some people can be so smart but lacks wisdom about Jesus Christ. My prayer is that you would see how God is all in creation and the science. God bless.
made a swallowing mess
He sounds " pissed up" had he had a few drinks??
You fooooool
Definitely inebreated.