The Marshall DSL 40 VS The Fender Hot Rod Deluxe
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ส.ค. 2024
- Here are some other products from a dealer I trust and buy from online
imp.i114863.ne...
Fender Hot Rod Deluxe
imp.i114863.ne...
Marshall DSL40 Combo
imp.i114863.ne...
Become a Patreon and support more videos like this
www.patreon.co...
Send photos of you in your shirt here
askknowyourgear@gmail.com
Facebook
/ knowyourgear
Instagram
/ phillip_mcknight
Know Your Gear T shirts
teespring.com/...
Two years ago this video helped me choose - I went for the Marshall, no regrets at all.
Two years later there is no gig anywhere on the planet though.
@@noelzhu1986 I've gigged it one time, a year and a half ago 😭
@@noelzhu1986 not true. Only stopped gigging for 8 weeks in here, and that was march last year.
Been gigging the whole time..
Living and loving New Zealand. :)
@@buddyray69 good for you! god bless.
@@var_guitar how much did you pay for the amp when you got it?
I'm a drummer and am not biased, to my ears the Marshall destroyed the Fender...
Apples & Oranges. Completely different kinds of amps. And this guy never showed off the amp to its potential. You aren't going to play Ratt on a Hotrod Deluxe. It's more of a blues/60's/70's rock amp.
thats why you are a drummer, stick to drumming
Wow I guess someone made you the authority on sound lol...I forget more than you know son....
...I'm a Fender guy and _I_ think the Marshall destroyed the Fender. The high gain on the Fender just sounded congested and clanky. I was very surprised. I suspect that the Fender might sound as good or better using various pedals instead of relying on the gain channel...
@@santafemikez9694 ...or rock'n'roll...
I have owned the Marshall DSL 40C for 4 years now. So far great amp. I love how versatile it is from a volume standpoint. I mean, I can play with decent quality at my bedroom without worrying about hearing loss.
After spending years in the 90's gigging with a JCM800 and a 4x12 I can say that now having a DSL40 for practice is amazing. The DSL40 is a really versatile little (or not so little) amp.
Fender clean, Marshall dirty...
bird718 I actually perfer the distortion so far on my Fender Hot Rod Deluxe which was my first amp & got in 2006. Just picked up the Marshall DSL40C and really like the clean on it, still working on getting the distortion I want on it, but I adore both amps. Was very happy with the Fender as my first amp. Can't wait to tear into the Marshall more
This was to be expected ,however the Marshall clean is still pretty good while the Fender dirty was worthless, making imho the Marshall more versatile.
As always. BUT, with pedals the Fender is my choice clean and dirty. The Marshall is made in Vietnam? Resale value? I can't believe he even said that.
Same
I own both and for me it’s Marshall for both, I’m actually going to sell the hot rod, the volume knob is a joke, one or off, at least I didn’t get one where the circuit board fries
I was surprised how much I liked the clean sound of the Marshall. I expected the Fender to blow it away in that category. I also wonder how the comparison would have been with a Strat or Tele.
Marshall kicked fenders ass here.
I liked the sound of it to.This might seem nitpicky but it wasn't a total comparison.Look close and you will see on the Marshall hes playing with the pickup selector on the neck position but on the Fender he's playing with both pickups on.
i saw the marshall on the bridge pickup for the distortoin and on the neck for clean...same as on the fender
Yep, I did exactly the same!
I’ve had both, the marshalls clean was complete garbage on a tele, fender takes this one on cleans.
I have an older Marshall DSL 40 watt. I like the clean channel set to breaking up slightly with pedals. Sounds so good.
The Gospel of Mark Agree. I don’t have a lot of use for the hi gain channel. I would like to see both channels identical to the first. I would set both on Crunch and one with less gain than the other
Thanks for not saying out loud which was which beforehand. I looked away to do a blind test to see if I could tell which was which. Being a DSL40C owner, I'm very happy to say I was correct, and preferred the sound of the Marshall.
Both sound great... packed full of sound options, with power and quality to use live... Won't ever understand why amp companies don't build giant handles (m@rshall quad style) in the sides of their combos, and options for wheels on the base... so much awesomeness poured into the tone... so little thought put into how gigging musicians actually lift, set up, and use these live.
I went to a music store looking yesterday looking to buy an amp and actually A/B'd these two amps. The Marshall had more high end gain (better for metal) while theFender had a more bluesy voicing. The Marshall had digital reverb, while the Fender had spring reverb, which clearly sounded better. It was a tough choice and I kept going back and forth between both of them, but eventually I walked out with the Fender. The better sounding reverb did it for me!
I own the DSL 40C Vintage Edition, killer looks and sounds, highly recommend it
I bought my 17 year old son a DSL40C in June (2019) and thought the Celestion seventy/80 was bright. I replaced the speaker with a Celestion G12 cream back 65 and it sounds great. My guitarist in my band has a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe from Corona, Ca and he A-B played these amps and prefers the Marshall. The Marshall rocks with the cream back, worth the money.
I was actually just trying to decide between these two amps, there's no comparisons on TH-cam and barely anything online besides a couple of forums. Thanks for the video.
Thanks for the reviews, I actually combine the Marshall along with the Hot Rod for my sound. The Fender adds the additional bass for more lower end and I split a signal with a DD7 Delay into stereo, Main out feeds a TRIO into the Fender (for drums and bass) .Using a Super CrunchBox for the distortion into the delay spices up each amp. Works well for me.
Great comparison dude. I myself have Marshall DSL40C with creamback speakers on them. it sounds amazing. One of the best amp you can play live and practice at bedroom volumes. Cheers
These DSL Marshalls are a fantastic amp. Professional sound, legendary crunch, easy to set the required tone. I have a 15 watt version which I love, I have a 4 x 12 cab with it, and it sounds bigger and better on its own than with the bigger cab. I had to take the back off the cab to get a similar sound, but bigger. Even then there was very little difference between the single speaker, and the 4 speaker cab. Great video Phil 🙂
Is it just me or does the marshall sound much better?
I have the dsl 40 and love it. I think its versatility is its best attribute. I play classic rock, 90's alternative and punk and metal and it can handle all of those great. The shared eq took a minute to figure out because the clean seemed a lot brighter than the gain channels but you can just roll the volume back a touch and it's perfect. The dual reverb settings is nice but neither reverb is very good. That's the main drawback. The fender has better reverb and slightly better clean but the Marshall is more versatile in my opinion. Love your videos thanks man.
Great video as always! I appreciate this comparison as I own both amps and like you, find each has its strengths and weaknesses. I tend to use the Marshall more because I love that distortion sound but I prefer the Fender for clean tones and reverb. I also find the Fender cuts through better with a larger group. If I wasn't so lazy I'd probably haul both to gigs and aby them depending on the song. Thanks again for all your videos, I really enjoy them.
Robert Wood I have a DSL 40c and really like it, but was just thinking to myself watching this vid that it would be cool to have both as I much preferred the Fender cleans.
I love my DSL40c, I sold a Fender Twin Reissue to buy the Marshall and I've never regretted it!
The twin is a VERY different amp from both of these. To be fair, its not a reasonable comparison.
I have had my DSL 40C for two years now, it gets better everyday. I applaud Marshall for making a real tube amp everyone can afford to buy. My only quibble, they should have left the reverb off, for me it was just to weak. I have a VanAmps Sole-Mate to cover that.This amp sounds great at any volume level and I have traveled from, New York to California without incident. I am very happy with this amp.
As an owner of both amps I can say they both serve their purpose. However ended up selling the HRD and keeping the DSL it really is more versatile. I use booth channels on the amp for color I use a velevet fuzz, archer and a vertex boost in the front and a tc flashback in the loop. Quite happy with the tones I get either with a les Paul or my strat. Great vid Phil Love your videos keep rockin 🤘🏼
I have to say I really enjoy your videos. Your guitar teacher approach really helps break down techniques and gear into simple steps to easily understand. Keep up the great work!
Phillip, You always have such informative reviews which, by the way, aren't too long and boring. Your vids really help when trying to sift, pick and choose gear. Thanks for the videos!
Based solely on this demo ( as opposed to name brand loyalty, hype, etc.), I preferred the sound of the Marshall all across the board. But then again, I'm hearing through my smart phone and not in person.
Thanks for sharing, Phill !
Man...I love the Marshall sound
Hey Phillip McKnight... all the knowledge (or more) than Scott Grove without the ego! Love it. Keep up the good work.
I want both. I think both sound great but they each their own strong points. But I also feel that I could play them interchangeably with no issues, or better yet, in stereo.
These 2 amps are what I got and they sound great in stereo. I do not think I would use them for the same sound.
Chad Morral, these are what me and the other guitarist in my band use. They each have their own strong points, but when the band is cranking in a club, the two different sounding amps create a nice Wall of Sound,
I have had my Hot Rod Deluxe v.3 for about 2-1/2 years now, and have loved it. You are right, it takes pedals very well, and consequently, can perform well in most genres. I looked at the Marshall, and though it does the British Marshall thing better than the HRD, that was not what I was after. With the right pedal, maybe I'd eat those words, who knows? It really depends on the tone you're after, but both are great options for the price point.
I've been gigging the marshall for years and can confirm that it handles a very wide variety of gigging and rehearsal situations
I can confirm this for both amps.
Hi Phil. This video has made my mind up! I was trying to decide between a Fender or the Marshall. With my style of music I'm drawn to the Fender but it's 25% more than the Marshall! Your demo has decided me on the Marshall, great cleans but with more versatility having more overdrive/dirty tones! Keep on bringing us great videos!
Great demo as always. The Marshall is more crisp while the Fender is a broader duller tone. that's why it's clean is fat and lush.
The Marshall gain is very good hear, you set it up very nicely.
I've always been an AC30 chap, but I can definitely see me using either of these. They're not perfect, but would certainly be more than adequate for back up equipment.
i love my marshal dsl 40c. i think it has an even better clean sound than the fender. i like the high frequency sparkly vibe.
This video helped me choose between these amps - I went for the Marshall and I'm glad I did. Thanks!
I've had both. I loved both of them. My dsl40 had a v30 in it, my hotrod deluxe has a guitar warehouse retro 30 in it. Both outstanding amps but my hotrod can do anything I want from country to metal.
I got the Fender 40 w HRD,damn that Marshall sounded good.
Dsl40 is hands down one of the best combo amps I have ever heard. I split my signal out of the guitar and run it with a secondary and sometimes 3 amps... Once you go multiamp you never go back LOL.
The DSL 40C really comes into it's own once you swap the stock speaker out. I've found that a Celestion Creamback 65 is a GREAT pairing with this Marshall!
The Marshall’s clean channel seems to have a chime that the fender is missing. The Marshall’s overdrive is definitely the no contest winner over the fender. Not only does the fender not have enough gain for my taste I don’t care for the overall tone. I do agree however that the fender has a much better reverb. Thanks for the video! Keep up the good work. You definitely helped me to decide which amp I’m going to purchase next!
I like both...
Have both
Just had to....
I owned a hot rod deluxe and a friend of mine owned a twin Reverb deluxe. We used to jam together and his amp sounded so much better than mine… So much better that I actually gave the amp away to my son who plays guitar as well. I bought a super champ X2 summer of 2020. I really dig it.I recently just bought the Marshall dsl 40 watt combo.. I run them together at the same time by using in AB switch pedal. I have an amazing display of pedals and I can tell you that I’m in love with both of these amps together. The nice thing is there plenty loud enough to piss the neighbors off but also small enough for bedroom shredding. I like your videos thank you very much
Regardless of where the DSL is built..i.have the 100 HR and the 20 CR.... absolutely love em. So pedal friendly and the raw power of the Marshall. The clean tone is great too!
Hey Phil I have both amps and in my experience the fender sounds better clean and the Marshall sounds better dirty. The biggest surprise I found was with gain pedals. Everyone talks about the fender being a great pedal platform but as far as gain overdrive pedals I found the Marshall to sound much better. The fender seems to have less frequency response. It almost sounds like AM radio. I may do a video on this.
Great job Phil.
I love my DSL40C. It's even better since I put a Dr. Z Air Brake lite attenuator on it.
Very Cool. I will have to try the Air brake out. Dr. Z makes great stuff
+Phillip McKnight The Air Brake lite is specifically built for combo amps. 👍🏻
Phillip McKnight
Blkjakk Is an attenuator when you can lower the volume on the amp and dont lose your tone
Mo Reina Think of an attenuator as a volume control for the speaker. When you overdrive your tube amp & with the attenuator set to decrease the speaker volume, you get the rich overdriven tube sound (by cranking your gain up along with your volume) but you can play at bedroom levels. The Dr Z. Air Brake lite is designed especially for combo amps. 👍🏻
I have the hot rod and I've always been very impressed with it. It takes pedals really well and is versatile. But after hearing this I gotta say I'm very very interested in the Marshall! Thanks for this vid!
I own both, when I'm gigging with a blues/country band / filling in due to time restraints on my end I use my Hot Rod . When I'm gigging in my personal band / southern rock, ac/dc etc.. I use my Marshall. Theyre both amazing for what genre your into
Would like to see a blues player compare the two amps. As far as rock, the Marshall wins hands down.
Bull for hard rock maybe yes for classic rock fender aaaaalllllllll the way
check "in the blues" for what you asked for.your welcome.
I definately like the Marshall better. More crisp sound to me :)
I'm very glad you tested this, so we don't have to buy them to test :-) i have t drive for two-three hours to the closest shop, and they don't have Marshall as well :-/
I have a 2005 DSL 401 that was made at the Marshall factory, Bletchley England. I also owned a 2006 Hot Rod Deluxe that was later sold. Both amps were upgraded with Celestion Vintage 30 speakers. So my experience is not with the same equipment that was in his demo. Here is my feedback anyway.... The clean channel on the Hot Rod along with the reverb are exceptional. If you want a tube amp platform for your pedalboard, this is THE AMP. I found all other features of the Fender unusable. I didn't care for the drive channel, at all. The effects loop was very noisy, to the point of being unusable. Also a minor annoyance was that 80% of the volume was between 1 and 4 on the volume knob. My personal preference is the drive channel on the Marshall. I love the drive in the 1 to 4 range and he touch sensitivity. The clean channel is not as clean as the Fender but it is usable. As this demo states, these really are two different amps for different purposes. My personal preference was the Marshall and it has been my gigging amp for years. As a shout out to Fender I would like to mention that I would love a blackface Princeton for gigs that require that clean Fender sound. PAs live this amp...
I know they're both great little amps but there's a reason you see more Marshalls all over the back drop of your favorite bands. Also the marshall really shines as you crank it up it gets better and better and has the sweetest sag that just takes you right into all of your favorite groups tones from the past. And if you put a little boost on, your face will melt like hot solder instantly. That is before I attach any pedals to it other than a little drive And you don't even need that. Nice video it really showed the differences. At 1st I thought the reverb was a little weak it kind of is but I think they did that intentionally knowing you were gonna put a bunch of stuff in front of it in the effects loop, it's more of a background reverb than in your face. A Little background when I received my marshall I played it for about a month started checking into different tubes just for fun found out that my pre amp tube was a little microphonic probly from shipping I went to my local small guitar shop mom and pop owned who happens to me a.MesaBoogie dealer and he said if I wanted to and had a couple dollars I should put a full complement of the matched Mesa power and pre amp tubes in, they are supposedly very high quality and very well tested I did that now it not only melts your face instantly it puts a hole right through your chest. I love This amp it does it all. Right Now I am learning a song which I always wanted to play for fun the boys are back in town by Thin Lizzy. The set up to match the song perfectly tone wise is a strat With Seymour Duncan hum buckers and a cord from guitar to amp that's it.
Marshall won.
In my studio the vintage Marshall’s get used for cleaner sounds , And rhythm sounds. The vintage
Fenders are usually the go to for solos , because they are saggier and dirtier.
I just bought a hot rod deluxe 3 for my first amp purchase and I think it sounds amazing with my strat and Mexican tele. I'm still a beginner though
Huckleberry Larry My first real amp was the Fender Hot Rod Deluxe which in 2006 and I can honestly tell you that you made a very wise choice. It won't disappoint you and I'm sure it hasn't so far. I recently just purchased the Marshall in this vid & love it just as much. Haven't palyed it enough yet for real feedback, but both are different and incomparable imo. You can compare them, but not in anyway to say which is better. Depends on the sound ypur going for. I like the Marshall clean more, and really love the distortion on my Fender Hot Rod.
I have both...My Marshall has the Creamback speaker upgrade, and the Deluxe has the 12AT7 Mod. I use both using an ABY switch.
Thank you, random guy from seven years ago who just happened to do a video on my hyper specific search!
Good God, the Marshall sounds so much better!
DSL40 with a V30 just awesome..
excellent video, the comparison was great, its not everyday you get to hear these two amps head to head. I was about to pull the trigger on an orange th 30 C but to be honest this marshall dsl 40 has totally impressed me. So the Marshall it is for this guy
I was sold on the Fender Hot Rod already. I loved the tone while running almost any overdrive/distortion pedal through it. The Deluxe is the next amp on my buy list.
Both amps sound great. f I could ony have one, Id probably choose the marshall because it's distortion has more clarity.
I'd love to see a comparison of the same type with the lower wattage amps. Something like the DSL5c vs Bassbreaker 007 combo.
I'll take both and A/B between the 2. Fender for cleans, Marshall for the D. Those JCM's with the independent channel EQ's were great because you could squeeze a much rounder, sweeter sound out of your clean channel without F'ing up your OD channel.
Hey Philip, I really look forward to your reviews. Even if it's not something I'm currently thinking about. You're one of the few TH-cam reviewers I trust to be impartial. I bought a Peavey classic mini head and I think getting a Marshall DSL401 would compliment it brilliantly, A mini stack with my little 1x12 speaker sitting on the Marshall and the Peavey on top. I gig quite a bit, sometimes with an orchestra where keeping volume down is tricky, but other times at regular club levels. Keep up the great work. You're appreciated all the way over here in Edinburgh, Scotland.
I loved the Marshall crunch.
My Fender Deluxe III doesn't sound like that! Maybe I need to crank it to 11.
I am a REAL YT gear info junkie...I think you do a GREAT justice to all of us fellow "GEAR JUNKIES"..Thank you so very much...you have addressed most of my gear questions for future buying...Please keep'em rollin.......8-)
I just did an A - B on these myself today and I think the Marshall was better tone for Rock and the Fender needed a pedal to compete. However the Fender sounded great with the pedal and had its own rock voice. Clean both were fine and many prefer the Fender for that, personally I would say it depends on what kind of tracks your playing with clean because again they had different qualities. I am likely to own both of these.
Marshall DSL 40C sounds much better and will be highly coveted amp in the future.
I own a fender style amp but I totally agree, in this vid the cleans were comparable but the distortion had a way better sound on the marshall.
the marshall cleans on this comparison were night and day superior with more sparkle,crystal clean note definition, liveliness and musicality,although this isn't typical as fender usually has the best cleans,definitely not in the hot rod series as i hear
Whenever I hear a Marshall that sounds better than a fender I remember that Marshall copied fender.
trillrif axegrindor My thoughts exactly man. I'm kind of stunned really. I never until now even considered Marshall for a combo amp like this. Or for any other amp. Loads of bands I love use them, don't get me wrong, just, I don't know. Fuck.
I bought the DSL 40 back when I was playing les Paul's all the time. I recently build a strat, and started playing it frequently. So as you can imagine feedback has become an issue. I think if you have single coils, and the fact the the DSL 40 is a high gain amp, it's tolerable but it's not best suited.
Great job making this video, looking forward to seeing more of your future ideas about guitar! Keep making those videos and don't stop.
Just bought a DSL40 today... I have a 2017 GibsonSG Special Limited ED.... such a good combination... highly recommend both!
Another amp to consider if you're interested in these is the Blackstar HT 40. Similar features to the DSL, but different sounds and more versatility. You can get a Fender style clean sound, classic crunch and that Blackstar distortion that many people (including me) really love and some apparently really hate.
blackstar has solid state distortion
blackstar has solid state distortion
Also the north american made Traynor. YCS50 is just unbelievable in head or combo under 900 US. Has both brit and USA modes and a great boost on the gain channel that you really notice on a single coil guitar.
My blackstar has a tube poer and preamp section, not sure what you are talking about. A lot like a marshall in tone, considering its former marshall employees.
The upper model black stars are all tube driven. Their lower end are solid state..
Awesome demo brah !! Plz keep it up !! subbed
I was looking at both of these amps I ended up with a white dsl 40 because I thought it was more versatile on its own and the only peddle I use is a wah and an overdrive and it absolutely kicks ass
I have a DSL40C (Creamback edition) and it's excellent. Big sound and a loud 40 watts. Great cleans and nice edge of breakup sound. Reverb is a little weak. Being more of a blues/classic rock player I do prefer the crunch/green channel over the High gain/red channels so it would be nice if the green clean/crunch channels were footswitchable. Overall it's a super solid amp.
I was lucky enough to be able to purchase a Marshall DSL 40c about a year ago, which was a huge upgrade from a line 6 spider. Its a beautiful amplifier. I found that the marshall is great for any kind of classic marshall tones. Its a lovely warm amp. However i'm having trouble with finding a fat classic blues tone. Any thoughts? Love the videos.
turn the gain down and the mids up,learn to use your guitars controls as well
George benson used the fender amp 4 his jaazz sound/tone and it is a killer amp and sound
I traded in a bunch of used gear to guitar center recently. It came down to the Marshall DSL 40c or a fender blues breaker. I went Marshall and have no regrets. It's a wonderful amp and I'm surprised by its versatility. Not a bad tone to be heard
i have a deluxe 3 and because of how well it handles pedals, it has been able to get me through everything from mellow to fuzzy stuff ...... i like it
Awesome demo man!I'm actually getting this Marshall tomorrow My wife & I tried all night figuring out what song are you playing at 4:46!?!? (I said Rage, she said The Cult)Thanks in advance!!
Fitman Feldman
Definitely Rage. "Sleep Now In The Fire"
a friend of mine plays in a rock band and he uses the fender hot rod deluxe III and loves it, like Phil said that thing takes pedals really well... my friend uses a Les Paul custom, it works great for him. however... I been contemplating a DSL40C for a while now, I think the price is good, the switch at the back to cut it to half power really helps if you wanna practice at home and not have to crank it up to crazy volumes in order to get great tone. I played that marshall countless hours at the local music store. .. I got familiar with the amp ( and the guys from the shop got familiar with me eheh) and I can honestly say it is a great option for anyone who wants a versatile amp, light (sort of) and not that expensive. it has some main sonic elements of the pure marshall tone we all know, but don't expect it to sound like a Bluesbreaker or a JVM ... rock on!
I have played Marshall's for years. Jcm series. But a couple years ago I bought a hotrod deluxe v3. And I love the clean channel. Sounds amazing. I though the distortion was alittle weak but with pedals. It's amazing. I actually sold my marshall and been playing this fender for everything. No regrets love it
I just bought a Marshall dsl 40c
best 40 wat head I've ever heard...clean and dirty....I think it will be a coveted amp in the future regardless of where it was manufactured....it's a Marshall!
i have the marshall and love it myself
I think I'm sold on the Marshall!
Have a Hot Rod Deluxe II. Replaced the speaker with the Eminence Red White and Blues speaker. It smooth out the ice pickiness, while still leaving a nice chime in the highs. It also tightened up the bass, so it's not muddy. I'm very pleased with it.
Wow, I was very surprised at how much better the Marshall sounded. The Fender had a real 'wet blanket' tone.
Hey I,ve just bought a 40watt black star , kinda does both .
you just made me wish i still had my dsl.. damn..
Literally the choice I’m making right now ! You’re THE BEST
Love the Fender clean, love the Marshall distortion, both great amps for different purposes.
Since we're talkin about amps, whats the difference in a closed back vs open back cabinet.
Karl Beerman Closed back = more push, projection and thump/tightness -and- open back is more loose Speaker (no pressure to tighten the speaker) ambient and less harsh and projecting. Many closed back cabs can sound radically different when opened depending upon the situation. Closed back when you want to project sound and open for less direct more all around sound ambient sound.
lots to think about, thanks.
Tighter bass response in a closed back. Very nice.
I own a HRD and never touch the gain channel. I wish it was a one channel amp haha.
Thanks, I think you are right in the ball park in using these two amps in comparison as to best selling in this price range. I believe this Marshall is Marshall's all time best selling amp, Fender's is the Blues Jr..
I just moved to Manhattan NYC from the Midwest where I have an oversized Mesa 412 and big tube heads so I'm trying to figure out what sort of versatile compact gigging amps I can get that will let me play in my apartment bedroom but also with a few guys in a practice space or small club. This review really helped me thanks a lot. And please recommend anything else you think I might ought to look into
I've got the DSL40C, and I LOVE that amp! I think it sounds better than my JVM210. The 40C also has a FANTASTIC effects loop that makes pedals sound fantastic. I thought my DS1 pedal sounded better in front of the amp though, but everything else goes in the loop. My only criticism is that the 40C's reverb is weak. You can solve that with a reverb pedal, but just about every review you'll read says the same thing -- reverb's weak.
Oh yea the reverb might as well not exist in the 40C
Thanks for the demo, much appreciated. I wish we could had also heard them through a Strat though.
Obviously late to the party on this video, but the exact video I needed to see as I’m currently comparing these exact 2 amps as I’m going yo buy one of them. For me, after this video I’m swayed more towards the Marshall. Thanks for all the videos as they are super insightful.
I went for the HRD. I like pedals and it handled them very well. I did NOT like the fact that 1.5 on the volume is too low, yet 2.0 blew everyone's ear drums out. I placed an attenuator in the effects loop and I can now drive the tubes REALLY well yet keep the volume low (no tone suck either). I like that amp WAY more now. Thanks for the review!
For those who don't know, the Marshall clean tone is the same one that people like Jimi Hendrix and John frusciante use. People like SRV and Josh Klinghoffer use fender clean tones
That Marshall sounds nothing like Hendrix used... not even close.
Matt Smith He used a Marshall dude, he just used a strat and obviously didn’t have as much gain on the amp demod here.
SRV used a blackface Fenders for his distortion and a Marshall Club & Country for his clean
Hendrix actually used Fender amps for
recording along with his marshalls. He used Marshalls for for his live rig.