S Tahboub I think his later works are less charming but much more mature and complex in a very good way. In his later years he really defined his own voice solidifying the ‘kapustin style’, rather than just sounding like gershwin on overdrive. Arguably his music became even more unique - it’s really hard to find anything quite like his later works.
Hi, thanks a lot for posting this recording! I'm not sure if you're aware but in the book Conversations with Kapustin the composer says that there is a concerto recording of him on TH-cam that is mislabeled as the Lundstrem Orchestra, while it's supposed to be the Karamyshev Orchestra. I think he's talking about this one :) The Lundstrem Orchestra didn't have any strings to begin with.
Faut absolument que je mette ce concerto à mon répertoire, vraiment excellentissime pianistiquement et orchestralement rien qu a voir la partition tout y est pour se faire grand bien au plus Haut niveau Musical , Étonnant Kapustin 👍🏽
The arrangement of that toccata for 2 pianos is pretty much near impossible for anyone who isn't a concert-level pianist but I want to see someone tackle it
I like your analysis but I think there's hardly any introduction, it's the first subject right away and then 0:19 cadenza, like in Cesar Concerto, for instance. The motif c-b-a-b-a-g is in the development too, and later on too. It's the first subject, imo.
@@vivvpprof Gotcha, so there's really 3 themes in the first subject group then... so I could replace my "intro" tags with FSG T1, and shift the other two FSG themes up a number
Behold, Kapustin - the only composer whose orchestral works incorporate a double bass part that is very often more interesting than the other strings’ parts.
I have linked Kapustin's style to Scriabin and it's clear that Gershwin is as likely another source. Did Kapustin maintain the same style throughout his life? I'm going to find out. Best
The Gershwin influence is very obvious particularly in the first movement. I also detect hints of Villa Lobos but overall it's very much Kapustin's own eclectic style.
i am not using that because of copyright issues regarding kapustin and the publisher of said full score. I have the full score anyways, so thank you =)
Sorry, can you help me to find the Score and the individuals Parts?? I‘m gonna play this concert but we don’t find the Parts to buy Them. I thank you so much if you can help me with lt
early Kapustin's music is so incredibly charming and unique
What about his later work?
S Tahboub I think his later works are less charming but much more mature and complex in a very good way. In his later years he really defined his own voice solidifying the ‘kapustin style’, rather than just sounding like gershwin on overdrive. Arguably his music became even more unique - it’s really hard to find anything quite like his later works.
@@hesangasong if you haven't heard the Kapustin concert rhapsody I really recommend it. Really encapsulates the early kapustin style.
@@hesangasong Agreed. Early Kapustin and Late Kapustin is almost like listening to 2 different composers.
@@SCRIABINISTearly kapustin is my fav by Far
I can't stop vibing to this, it's just so good.
I literally just want to show this to someone and ask "ya like jazz?"
That toccata is genuinely the juiciest and silkiest thing I’ve listened to this week.
This piece puts me in a good mood immediately!
Jazzy, shmaltzy, unabashedly show tuney, but the product of a superior musical mind.
11:10 Smash Bros Character Select theme :D
Hi, thanks a lot for posting this recording! I'm not sure if you're aware but in the book Conversations with Kapustin the composer says that there is a concerto recording of him on TH-cam that is mislabeled as the Lundstrem Orchestra, while it's supposed to be the Karamyshev Orchestra. I think he's talking about this one :) The Lundstrem Orchestra didn't have any strings to begin with.
But the book was written before this one was uploaded
@tarikeld11 You're right, but this doesn't change the fact that the Lundstrem orchestra doesn't have strings.
Faut absolument que je mette ce concerto à mon répertoire, vraiment excellentissime pianistiquement et orchestralement rien qu a voir la partition tout y est pour se faire grand bien au plus Haut niveau Musical , Étonnant Kapustin 👍🏽
RIP Nikolai Kapustin
очень своеобразно,,слушаю с удовольствием,никогда не слышал подобной обработки класики и джаза
0:37 the drums really add some SERIOUS groove
holy moly that third movement is crazy
The arrangement of that toccata for 2 pianos is pretty much near impossible for anyone who isn't a concert-level pianist but I want to see someone tackle it
8:14 부터 8:38 까지 너무 좋다....진짜 이부분 요즘 매일 떠오르고 설레는 느낌
저도 원래 1악장이 최애였는데 요즘 2악장이 최애예요 ,, 왕국에 입성하는 기분이랄까 ㅜㅜㅜ
벅차오르네요ㅜ
13:00~14:03
전 진짜 이부분 너무 좋네요.. 1악장이랑 3악장 이 부분이 이 곡에서 제일 좋은것 같아요..!
th-cam.com/video/-A6J9_J2-vE/w-d-xo.html
이 영상에서 이 부분 들어보면 진짜 너무 좋아요
1st Movement Sonata Form (feel free to correct me):
Exposition
Introduction: 0:00
First subject group, Theme I: 0:20
FSG T2: 0:45
Transition: 1:12
Second subject group, Theme I: 1:28
Codetta: 2:20
Development: 2:34
Recapitulation
Intro reprise: 3:49
FSG T1: 3:53
FSG T2: 4:08
Transition: 4:21
SSG T1: 4:35
Codetta: 4:56
Coda: 5:11 (Joke-y Beethoven Symphony 5 riff: 5:33)
I like your analysis but I think there's hardly any introduction, it's the first subject right away and then 0:19 cadenza, like in Cesar Concerto, for instance.
The motif c-b-a-b-a-g is in the development too, and later on too. It's the first subject, imo.
@@vivvpprof Gotcha, so there's really 3 themes in the first subject group then... so I could replace my "intro" tags with FSG T1, and shift the other two FSG themes up a number
@@BryanSaylor1 Yes :)
Sorry, I meant the Emperor Concerto by Beethoven 😂
2nd movement: Would You Like to Fly to the Moon with Me? Really take me back to 20s nightclub in Berlin!
11:06 the DSCH motif
Behold, Kapustin - the only composer whose orchestral works incorporate a double bass part that is very often more interesting than the other strings’ parts.
11:53
music of animetion
9:05 onwards, the licc (except missing the penultimate note each time)
7:53 why does it sound so familiar? Has it been used anywhere else?
Love this piece, and great to see the score now! Thanks.
1:28 and 4:34
you did it!! thank you so much!!
9:04 the LICK!!!
Strangely enough, piano part is clearly missing all the glissandi, such as at 02:24 (upward) or 05:10 (downward).
2:31 is missing the left hand entirely :0
The whole score is missing the woodwind and brass sections.
musescore gliss notation sucks
Yes!!
Прелесть!!!
I have linked Kapustin's style to Scriabin and it's clear that Gershwin is as likely another source. Did Kapustin maintain the same style throughout his life? I'm going to find out. Best
The Gershwin influence is very obvious particularly in the first movement. I also detect hints of Villa Lobos but overall it's very much Kapustin's own eclectic style.
lebendig
3:16
5:35midsummer night
Not sure if it was mentioned but this is the Karamyshev Orchestra, not the Oleg Lundstrem orchestra
0:19
The strings part starting at 1:56 sound really off and creepy, it sounds like they’re really confused about his strange writing hehe
If 1970s TV variety shows had piano concertos for theme songs . . .
KAP 2
Good score, but it's missing the brass and wind instruments!
I have this score if you want.
i am not using that because of copyright issues regarding kapustin and the publisher of said full score. I have the full score anyways, so thank you =)
Hello! Would you be able to send me the full score?
@@Harry-gc8kb you can find it withiut problzm on the net ... But if you don't find, give me something, so I can send it to you
Sorry, can you help me to find the Score and the individuals Parts?? I‘m gonna play this concert but we don’t find the Parts to buy Them. I thank you so much if you can help me with lt
What is this wack ass score