Solid take :) HOWEVER!....😂 Id change: AP snub for the pisses exp, starter Titan. starter+ Nomad Cargo snub, 135. Starter 315p Combat snub, Fury Thanks for sharing your views, have a great day🍻
@@Teejay82_ almost put the furry up there, but it’s larger size makes those wings a bit easier to pop off. 315’s really solid and I’m glad it’s finally shining now - it was my second upgrade in the game
@@DawnstealerGaming Nice! My 1st package was the titan stalker back in 2017. went from there to a Cutlass black. Cutlass black is peak. im never melting or ccuing it. D4L❤🔥
I dont think I would take the Corsair over the Taurus for a solo or 1 player. Corsair isnt horrible but the Taurus I think edges it out and its 50 cheaper.
When I had a Taurus, I flew it every day. When I had a corsair, I flew it three times. The elevator is better and that is it. Especially after the nerf, I would not ever go back to a Corsair.
Im hoping the misfortune that gets hinted at fills that medium + size salvage or a bigger single player miner. I’d also say the C1 should be in that chart somewhere but no major disagreements.
@ right, and I say this a lot, but what the BMM really needs is a couple smaller Banu ships that do a similar thing so CIG can get a handle on the style guide and mechanics
Large McBighuge Wrong. The defining characteristic of a "snub" in SC is that it does not and cannot have a quantum or jump drive, not where you can spawn them, many small ships can spawn at "vehicle" pads. The only actual "snubs" are the MPUV's and the Krugers, the 135c is not a snub, it's a cargo starter. the Pisces/all variants are specifically also NOT snubs (actually specified during concept as a "full ship" ie would have QD/JD), so the only snub you got right is the P-72.
@@stargeezer8427 85x is a snub and has a quantum drive, and as I explained in the vid, I was including ships that could be spawned at mining stations, which both the Pisces and 135 can
Sorry if that came out harsh, but that word has caused way too many issues and arguments over the years, they really should stop using it (or post their supposed explanation somewhere obvious and easy to find). The 85x is not a snub, as you said it has a QD, but (I think) it may yet eventually wind up jump capable.... It came at a time (and there have been many such "times") when they weren't sure what/how they were doing things, but "ships" were specified as vessels that could have a QD and/or a JD while a "snub" had neither. When pressed this has been CIG's consistant "official" definition, although many backers have mislabelled many small ships and CIG devs themselves have mispoke as well. The Carrack "shuttle" was another LONG drawn out debate among backers, until CIG broke it up with the it's a "full ship" statement. As an aside they have also since explained that a QD and/or JD were not necessarily going to be seperate things/components (although I think it's more likely now that they will be), but possibly even just a "tuned" or "more advanced" version of common/standard hydrogen drives (so they could supposedly add them to more ships?). Anyway the 85x is not just a fossil of sorts, but is currently the only example of a craft with just a QD, and "petitions" and why not posts frequent come up for the Argos to get at least a QD as well (a big why I think CIG may still toss this "snub" silliness entirely, backers REALLY love their Argos). Another common gripe about so-called "snubs" besides being particularly limited (some say gimped/useless) is that CIG has sold these 'not ships' standalone providing yet another 'trap' for new people to fall into. Some of this debate started way back on the original now dead forums, but a lot of this info is still out there, so you obviously don't have to take my word for it. 🍻
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Solid take :) HOWEVER!....😂 Id change:
AP snub for the pisses exp, starter Titan. starter+ Nomad
Cargo snub, 135. Starter 315p
Combat snub, Fury
Thanks for sharing your views, have a great day🍻
@@Teejay82_ almost put the furry up there, but it’s larger size makes those wings a bit easier to pop off. 315’s really solid and I’m glad it’s finally shining now - it was my second upgrade in the game
@@DawnstealerGaming Nice! My 1st package was the titan stalker back in 2017. went from there to a Cutlass black. Cutlass black is peak. im never melting or ccuing it. D4L❤🔥
I dont think I would take the Corsair over the Taurus for a solo or 1 player.
Corsair isnt horrible but the Taurus I think edges it out and its 50 cheaper.
When I had a Taurus, I flew it every day. When I had a corsair, I flew it three times. The elevator is better and that is it. Especially after the nerf, I would not ever go back to a Corsair.
@@CraigPaschang I can see why people wouldn't like 1 ship or another. The backdoor on the Corsair was convenient though lol
1.27"....but you're not bitter"😅
@@andrewcoulthard-clark certainly NOT
Im hoping the misfortune that gets hinted at fills that medium + size salvage or a bigger single player miner. I’d also say the C1 should be in that chart somewhere but no major disagreements.
C1 and Zeus are both really solid, yeah
sure its been 10 years since I threw down for the BMM but its multiplied in value and size XD
@@GeneralDodanna yeah, I mean originally it was supposed to be a hair larger than the Connie
@DawnstealerGaming then the modeling of thousands of cu, the bazaar, and the fighter bay
@ right, and I say this a lot, but what the BMM really needs is a couple smaller Banu ships that do a similar thing so CIG can get a handle on the style guide and mechanics
@DawnstealerGaming yeah especially since the defender is kind of a mid to heavy interceptor type fighter
Herald is uglier than the Intrepid
@@TomHuitema-dp1zb they’re both beautiful…on the inside
It may be, but being drake is entirely expected, thus why loved more than the plasticy intrepid
Large McBighuge Wrong. The defining characteristic of a "snub" in SC is that it does not and cannot have a quantum or jump drive, not where you can spawn them, many small ships can spawn at "vehicle" pads. The only actual "snubs" are the MPUV's and the Krugers, the 135c is not a snub, it's a cargo starter. the Pisces/all variants are specifically also NOT snubs (actually specified during concept as a "full ship" ie would have QD/JD), so the only snub you got right is the P-72.
@@stargeezer8427 85x is a snub and has a quantum drive, and as I explained in the vid, I was including ships that could be spawned at mining stations, which both the Pisces and 135 can
Sorry if that came out harsh, but that word has caused way too many issues and arguments over the years, they really should stop using it (or post their supposed explanation somewhere obvious and easy to find). The 85x is not a snub, as you said it has a QD, but (I think) it may yet eventually wind up jump capable.... It came at a time (and there have been many such "times") when they weren't sure what/how they were doing things, but "ships" were specified as vessels that could have a QD and/or a JD while a "snub" had neither. When pressed this has been CIG's consistant "official" definition, although many backers have mislabelled many small ships and CIG devs themselves have mispoke as well. The Carrack "shuttle" was another LONG drawn out debate among backers, until CIG broke it up with the it's a "full ship" statement. As an aside they have also since explained that a QD and/or JD were not necessarily going to be seperate things/components (although I think it's more likely now that they will be), but possibly even just a "tuned" or "more advanced" version of common/standard hydrogen drives (so they could supposedly add them to more ships?). Anyway the 85x is not just a fossil of sorts, but is currently the only example of a craft with just a QD, and "petitions" and why not posts frequent come up for the Argos to get at least a QD as well (a big why I think CIG may still toss this "snub" silliness entirely, backers REALLY love their Argos). Another common gripe about so-called "snubs" besides being particularly limited (some say gimped/useless) is that CIG has sold these 'not ships' standalone providing yet another 'trap' for new people to fall into. Some of this debate started way back on the original now dead forums, but a lot of this info is still out there, so you obviously don't have to take my word for it. 🍻
@ I was pretty active on those old forums, yeah