Genetic History of Europe
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 เม.ย. 2014
- Read this before posting comment....
The presented stated is based on mainstream theories, no conspiracy or alternative theories.
However I needed to decide on some controvercies:
- First of all I apologize Western and Southern Europe nations - I treated it very general, I specialize mostly in Germanic, Slavic, Nordic and Balts
- It is finally undecided if in Scandinavia R1B or R1A appeared first, but it doesn't matter: Germanic and Nordic nations contain the mix of I1/R1B/R1A, Nordic nations in proportion: 40/40/20. Germans have more R1B because they absorbed more Celtic tribes
- Blond hair and blue eyes of Nordic people should be propably associated with I1 genes not Indoeuropean genes; Slavic nations have up to 70% Indoeuropean (R1A) genes and in historical sources they are described as brown or red haired
- For Slavs I have chosen allochtonic theory - that they were born from remains of Indoeuropeans in Ukraine; autochtonic theory says they were born on territory of Poland but from genetic point of view it does not matter
- I assumed that Venedi people group were neither Germanic neither Slavic - they were separate branch of Indoeuropean people later absorbed by both groups
- The story ends in 1500 BC: later on complex Germanic, Celtic migrations start and it is very complex do show them on such general map
- Process how Indoeuropean language spreaded is controversial - it is unknow how Romans became Indoeuropean speakers
- Finnic language appeared circa 1500BC however it seems that population was there earlier
Music: ( I needed to remove Wardruna and replace with legal soundtrack, sorry)
![[ไฮไลต์] ฟุตบอลชาย อุซเบกิสถาน vs สเปน รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2ps5WKV1Mq0/mqdefault.jpg)
But i thought that some African scientist invented us in a lab
Ye me to
This is just a white lie don’t believe anything you see here we were crafted in a lab in the capital of Kenya 500 years ago
Dey wuz engeeenirz and sheete.
Well, technically speaking, ALL hominids originated in East Africa sooo.... we were kinda created in a lab by a scientist, if the lab being Africa, and the scientist being nature.
YAKUB
Actually R1b and R1a are both indoeuropeans, they're just two different kinds of the same root
no r1b is anatolian and both related from persia and central asia but not the same population.
R1b is northeast Asian while Ria is Scyth-Aryan stemming from Andronovo culture
Bullshit.
Crap.
Not true.
Your information is really interesting, but what are your sources?
Incorrect on so many levels. R1b were indoeuropeans, you forgot the early neolithic farmers, etc etc do more research before spreading misinformation
Thank you.. how misleading is this, suggesting, people of today in wales Scotland and Ireland are descendants of Anatolian farmers.. the very people our ancestors appear to have genetically replaced on the British isles
@@speke3055 We Europeans, are all descendants of the Neanderthals. Just because Western Europe started farming doesn't mean that they were invaded by Anatolians, what could have happened is that some Europeans learned from the Anatolians how to farm and then taught their brothers and sisters/relatives and neighbours how to farm in the rest of Europe.
@@nubeirothropic not quite what happened
@@speke3055 Not quite. The majority of Scotts actually did come from Greece/Anatolia, only it was mainly during two separate occasions. Modern day Scottish/Irish DNA consists of about 30% Early Farmer DNA from the south, 25% Hunter Gather DNA from the south (also came through Anatolia), and 45% Yamnaya from the East. So they’re basically 55% ancient European and 45% ancient Eurasian
@@nubeirothropic Not really. Neanderthals only make up about 1% of our DNA. The other 99% came from the human species Homo heidelbergensis
150.000 visits, thank you! :) The film is already little bit outdated, especially I1 and I2 division became obsolete.
Can u post a new updated version?
Thank you for basing this on actual history! Can you make another one like this, but more accurately? Also some parts were confusing between migration, mutation or starting farming etc...
Love the music and singing! Magical!
I like your surname, I like your video and I really enjoyed the music you chose. So 3 out of 3 from me, my good sir!
Nice music
Why are most Europeans just so damn beautiful? Why? I ask you, why?
We have the best genetics.
gtg gtg We have probably the best mix. High IQ, tall bodies. Lot of Variation in look(blond,red,dark,Brown hair) and blue eyes.
Yeah, every other race just has their own single skin tone, black hair and brown eyes.
i vivos isn't supposed to be the Mediterranean diet the healthiest?
#it'scomplicated - WE ARE VERY DIVERSE .... I’M AN ALBANIAN AND MY PATERNAL GRAND-PA HAD BLUE EYES , MY MATERNAL GRAND-PA HAD GREENISH EYES AND I HAVE VERY DARK EYES .... MY BROTHER , ME AND MY SISTER WERE BLOND DURING CHILDHOOD AND I HAVE COUSINS WITH BLUE, GREEN AND DARK EYES .... WE ARE DIVERSE
This is the best fiddle music ever. I love it! Ragnar!
Guys that video is old and the sources are very old, Let's just appreciate the effort put into it and the revolution it caused
This was very Northern European focused
jjgreek1 that's true, sorry for that
Lukasz Macedonians were Hellenes not a seperate national group. Macedonian were a branch of Doric (actually, in truth quite the opposite since dorians descended from today's western Macedonia).
dorians were scythian invaders to balkan. macedonians were fierce enemies of them. pure european blood!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok man so then all Hellenes are scythians, you have a lot of fantasy.
wuahahahahahahah, not all. but you greeks came much later, no whatsoever conection to hellenic heritage. just like your brothers shiptars to illyrian. same story. false history wasn't written for you but against us, europeans. but you are too brainwashed or stupid to understand this. blood doesn't lie, like books do. go spread your bullshit to americans not to me, I know everything about you.
1:53 R1b is acually Indo-European as well. The Indo-Europeans screwed all of Western Europe. Only in the Balkans, Parts of Scandinavia and southern Italy/Sardinia male Neolithic genes prevail over the Indo-European ones. While Basques kept their Neolithic language, there male genes are Indo-European.
Very good! I like it simplified. Helps sort it!
Hey, I like it! Very concise summary.
Lukasz I have little correction to time around 20 000 BC. People were not hiding somewhere between today Spain and France. Here in Slovakia we quite commonly find stone and bone tools belonging to gravettian culture (oldest ones are from around 21 000 BC). Especially in central Slovakia mountains which probably wasnt fully covered by glaciers and these people lived here on their hunting trips.
people WERE hiding in southern France and northern Spain,that's for Western Europe; who knows for East Europe.
Basques!
+er lo What do you mean by that? You mean the Gorals?
The oldest art representation in the world (consequently the first manifiest of complex abstract thought) is in Cueva del Castillo in northern Spain dated 40.800 years ago, the second one in Sulawesi Indonesia, 40.000 years ago
You know that in europa there was some other cultures before the indo-european
In fact, you had metalurgy, farming and other advanced technologies, 7500 BC in lepenski vir.
Ragnar Lodbrok music! Love that fiddle, simply awesome!
And what s the name of the New & Beautiful soundtrack?
gobekli tepe tells us farming existed at least 12,000 years ago.
+GIANTSECRETS Yeah you are right
+GIANTSECRETS It may be equally if not more likely that Gobekli Tepe predates farming, and that the establishment of a cultural (religious, social, economic, you name it) center for nomadic hunter gatherers may have been the goad that initiated the agricultural revolution. There is no contemporaneous evidence of farming in the region, and the structures there led to the development of farming as over time there grew up a "staff" of priests, protectors, crafters, and, sure, maintenance crew,who stayed on after the in-gathering of the tribes. Not being able to hunt and gather, farming provided a means of supporting a sedentary population. The first steps in farming would be difficult to detect archaeologically as it was likely simply an intensification and further development of methods already in use. It took several thousand years for the practice and technology of farming to evolve, and is not as thoroughly understood and documented as we might like. There weren't that many people around back then, their physical artifacts were few and perishable, and much has undoubtedly been lost with decay, erosion, burial, drowning with post-glacial sea-level rise, and later development (e.g. urbanization, et cet.). But on the whole you are right, something supremely important was percolating in human culture earlier than we previously suspected, and there's a lot more to find out.
How that connects with population shifts after the ice age I couldn't begin to say. I don't know if your monicker means that you believe in a population of giants in prehistory, and I mean no disrespect, but I don't think giants or elves or gods or aliens or anything other than plain old ordinary humans like you and me brought about civilization. There's no "secret history" of mankind, there's just us. Good on ya!
in fact CATALHOYUK was homeland of proto Indo-European people
My name represents the idea of secrets being giant such as the display image I am using. The image is a giant secret. The image is the color image that was given to the US president of the day for use on the one dollar note. Like the Giza pyramids represent the Sun, Jupiter and Saturn. This next part has nothing to do with my name but the animals were all larger pre 9483 bc when the Earth had a giant catastrophe. This when see stop seeing the mega fauna in our history. All animals were big including humans. Gigantopithecus was a giant ape and this shows animals just like us were also giant. There are videos on youtube showing multiple evidences of giant humans. Giant highly polished coffins were found in Egypt and the giants that were originally buried in them were probably the pyramid builders. The catastrophe of 9483 bc changed the earth so all animals are now smaller. Just recently we have seen lots of flooding worldwide, this water runs to the sea and we know sea level rises. The Earth is a constantly changing environment and humans along with other animals are a product of our environment. The environment today doesn't normally allow for people 12 ft tall. There are many places around the world where advanced ancient human civilizations have gone under water.
Kanıt? Ne kadar aptalca bir söz söylediğinin farkında mısın ?
How can the music be "in Old Norse" if there aren't any lyrics?
What is the background music's name?
What about j2 and G haplogroup from the caucuses? There was migration from there to europe and this j2 haplogroup with Greco-Anatolian origin is found through out europe, although its mostly common in the caucus,balkans, and southern europe. I believed that R1a and R1b dominated j2 and G haplogroup when they mixed during PIE migration and therefore some if it was washed out. Although both are still decently present amongst Europeans
Great video but I suggest making another one based on more recent studies.
This is nice, but you forgot one thing: Back in the Ice Age, because all the water was frozen, sea levels were a lot lower than they are now and as the ice started to melt, sea levels gradually rose to present levels. You should've included this change of shoreline in your map, since without it, it's kind of hard to understand how people could have gotten to Scandinavia and the British Isles, if you assume there was no sufficiently advanced boat technology. But I know such maps, especially usable ones, are very hard to find, and otherwise you did a good job :)
Where's Doggerland for example?:)
vormaw
Yes, exactly. If they had done a Google image search for a map of Doggerland they could've probably found a more useful map.
a continent later an island now obviously submerged between England and Scandinavia.
I think he said simplified version.
Wait so how did they go to Britian if there was no boat 😟
so now how do you explain that I have an 0 negative mutant blood type and I drain watch batteries and interfere with electric devices!?
The beginning sounds good!
Yamnaya samples were exclusively R1b not R1a.
How did corded ware related Yamnaya culture became mostly R1a if their ancestors were R1b y-dna carriers?
This is an old video. More recent genetic evidence based on ancient DNA shows Europeans are a mix of indigenous Western Hunter Gatherers, Eastern Hunter Gatherers, Neolithic Levantines, and Neolithic Iranians.
The Famous Nord West Block were Veneds, they got to the Low Countries. Their language was eerily like Italic.
Does anyone know what this song is called? I love it.
You have a mistake. R1B likely expanded across the Northern European plain (not through Anatolia after the LGM) before the last glacial maximum. R1B was then likely trapped in Iberia, with the I lineages being trapped in the Balkans and R1a being trapped near the Caucasus when the glaciers expanded.
Yes exacly but R1a was trapted in region of river Don and Azow Sea between Southern Russia and East Ukraine and R1b was trapt in southern/central and western France and Northern /Central Italy as well as also in northern Caucasus also ...
no haplogroup R1b was came from Anatolian its true
Ali Kilic Then why are it's highest proportions on the western fringe of the Atlantic coast? Both in modern populations and in ancient skeletons?
+Psychocatalyst please you are look Europedia ok
+Psychocatalyst even haplogroup R1a was came from middle asian and siberian
R1 is the Indoeuropean Y-Haplogroup which later split into R1a and R1b. R1a seems to be a marker mostly for Slavs while R1b seems to be mostly for Celts.
Very interesting, thanks for sharing.
Wow! the sound is perfect !
Why do not say nothing about ice age mammoth hunters in Dolni Vestonice in Southen Moravia 30 000 BC? !!!~
They large civilization in South Poland and Balkans?
But it was not a civilisation..
So...first europeans with haplogroup I...were from Spain!!!...incredible.
By the other hand, today, Spain is one of the most homogeneus countries in Europe, from the point of view of their genetic code: R1B. Just look at the statistics. It´s very likely that 2000 years ago spaniards closely resembling the Spanish today.
Arrogant Spaniard. It was Northern Spain, Andorra, and Southern France. This represents the Basque culture.
NOT, BASQUE LENGUAGE WAS EXTERMINATE BY FRENCHS IN 1790 ONE YEAR AFTER OF REVOLUTION AND 80% OF BASQUE ITS FROM IBERIAN AND ANDORRA ITS A LONG WALL BASICALLY
YES I WAS IN SPAIN AND IT IS A COUNTRY VERY HOMOGENIC GENETICALLY, I STUDIED IN NORWAY YOUR CULTURE
Spain is everything but genetically homogenous, this is not true. Spain was occpupied by the muslimics saracens from 711-1492. Many of those saracens where from sub sahara Africa. So Spain is anything but homogenous especially in the south. Many black ancestors and from the arabic tribes in north Africa.
If you look in the enceclopedia britannica from around 1900 you will see its written there. Due to political correctness all the correct information vanished in the later editions, step-by-step. spain is genetically very mixed.
wtf are you talking about, spaniards mixing with arabs or jews were extremly rare, in fact spanish blood it's mostly Rb1 brilliantmaps.com/the-genetic-map-of-europe/ you are comparing 800 years of Arab ocupation with thousands of years of Roman, celtic and germanic ocupation.
"Some reason" being fearsome conquest of the entire Europe by R1A
What happened to the Neolithic farmers (J2, G)? They brought agriculture from Middle East and Caucasus through Anatolia and then the Balkans
Nice but you left out J2, and E3, - G, etc. Samis were from north Asia. Agriculture was brought to Europe by ME and Central west Asian farmers.
People are people. I say: if you are flat as a highway in your backhead, you from east. If not, you come from west. And the you look at eyes, cheak, chin, and the last test is how tolerant you are in your nature. But this is rascism!
Long back heads always looked weird to me. Like some kind of alien elongation. How does somebody even sleep like that?
Great job and overview
Much enjoyed!
Not very correct what has been shown here. First Europeans expanded from the Middle East through the Caucasus those were the I and C bearers. They populated the whole continent.
Than came the Neolithic Anatolian farmers (yDNA G2a) some of them mixed in the Balkans with the mesolithic yDNA I people. And expanded on the whole Continent and started to merge with the early Europeans step by step. Than a second farmer group from the Iranian Plateau expanded. They were R1b. They expanded into Caucasus , Central Asia and the Pontic_Caspian Steppes. In those regions they mixed with the indigenous Eastern Hunters and Gatherers and expanded as Indo Europeans on the whole continent.
+dataman121 Yep, I do not see contradiction.
Nah Iranian goes east not west bruh. I'm Iranian.
Iranians is one thing and Iranic people is the other (Scyths and Sarmatians which occupied Ukraine were Iranic). Moreover for example Ossetians have language of Iranic origin
R1B is origins are still inconclusive...
You're statement is not honest...
Some state that R1B is of iberian origins...
The highest frequency of R1B is found there....
And from there it spread it throughout Western Europe...
There i just gave another well accepted theory among many theorists...
Lukasz Rzepinski Iranian is not European tho.
Celts are halfway between Nordics and Mediterraneans, they are Alpines. They originated as a separate people in the Black Forest area around 4000 BC.
You are confusing two theories.
The theory that claims Celts come from the Hallstat Culture in the black forest area only dates back to at most 1200 B.C
The theory that claims the celts date back to almost 4000 B.C is the Atlantic Seabord theory, which claims they were some variant of the Bell Beaker Culture and spread from the Atlantic Western Europe into the east after the ice age.
I personally believe in the latter, there are celtic evidences in Galicia, Brittany, Scotland and Ireland who date much further back than the Hallstat Culture. These regions also share the highest percentages of R1b-L21, which is curious.
@Amanda Fragoso
Honestly claiming that each haplogroup belongs to an ethinicity is absurd. If R1b was celtic, then it would be very contradictory since the people with the highest R1b are the Basques, and they were never Celtic.
Other never celtic countries like Scandinavia, the Caucasus, Iran, Turkmenistam, Eastern Europe, Niger, Camaroon, Chad, Sudan, and Western China also have considerabley higher R1b than a country like Serbia, which did have Celtic presence.
R1b is too wisespread to "belong" to such a restrictive ethnicity.
'Celtic' is not a race, or even a sub-race. It is a cultural term.
@@gladifly
This tbh
Nice presentation and fabolous song. Let me ask you on what sources you base appearance of Slavs at 1700 BC? Traditionally they are distinguished as separate ethnic entity much later - not earlier than 300 CE or even 500 CE.
Juras Visockis circa 1500BCE it is said that BaltoSlavs separated and created protoBalts and protoSlavs; where exactly - it is still disputed; it is according to linguistic research
SkroD82 I propose some science, R1A is Indoeuropean blood of wider group of people (not nations), to analyse typical "blood" of people groups you need to go into specific R1A mutations
Lukasz Rzepinski Balto-Salvic stage is disputed. To me Vyacheslav Ivanov and Vladimir Toporov convergence theory is more likely as attempts to reconstruct Balto-Slavic proto-langue were not successful. All what was achieved was nothing but Proto Indo European which of course show common Indo European roots but close linguistic features being explained by later geographical proximity.
15.000 is not even Indo-European. You pushing Slavs back to Mesolithic or even further back :D
Juras Visockis i didnt say slavs 15000 years ago i said R1a haplogroup, from which later also slavs evolved..
Some of the Venedi started the Veneto in Italy, and some of them started Vannes in Brittany. And the Swedes are Balto-Vened Germanics.
It is likely that both R1a and R1b were Indo-European. R1b was from the southern steppe and northern Caucuses, while R1a was from the northern forest steppe and Central Asia from the Urals all the way to lake Irktusk, with a minority or R1b among them just as R1b dominant populations in the ponto-caspian steppe had some R1a prior to the Indo-European expansion. Its important to note that in regards to R1b I am talking about M269 specifically.
+Leoghanta Bakker According to modern genetics, the R1b was not part of the Indo European linguist family, but rather part of proto Turks, proto Sumerians.
+VendPrekmurec No. that's absolute nonsense and has nothing at all to do with modern genetics.
+VendPrekmurec No. that's absolute nonsense and has nothing at all to do with modern genetics.
Wild Hunt Trumpeter, well it does. R1b originated in central Asia, before it moved into the west AFTER R1a haplogroup and I haplogroup already existed in western and northern Europe. R1b was pretty much aggressive, it went down into the Middle east (Sumerian; Sumerians carried R1b haplogroup), Egypt and all the way into the central Africa; majority of R1b descendants (men) are blacks there.
The word "Nanny" for example has purest proto Turkish (proto Sumerian) root. It means "protector" in old Sumerian... Ninaveh carries that name too, which means "keeper, protector (a military garrison (city))", Italian Nonna (grand mother), Nonno (grand father) which drives similarity with Turkish word for a grand mother as "büyükanne" or anneanne or simply as "nine". Hungarian (old Hunnic) word for a grand mother is nagymama or older as nagyanya; so the root is ANYA or ANNA or ANA or NANA or NIN... "nurse, keeper, protector" (in the female form)... Or for example the old proto turkish (original R1b carriers & speakers) English word "Pine" (tree)... which is related with Hungarian fenyőfa; the root is FENYA or PEN or PIN. This is not a "IE" word, but rather original proto Turkish, before R1b carriers absorbed IE lingual elements of R1a enslaved wives, and became what they are today... a "Centum" group...
Not correctly.
I want to know more now about the start of the first europeans. Where did the come from. they started in spain?
Middle East near caucasus region in today's armenia georgia and russia
No they came Greece/Anatolia. This video starts well 20,000 years after they came to Europe. I’m not sure if he’s saying there was a lot of them in Spain at one point or if he’s just completely wrong
an udated vid would be great with new findings and understanding of what was presumed before. with new findings our resumptions are better lol.
lol wtf was that BS
Why so many dislikes? I don't get it.
Europe was first populated trough the Balkans not iberian peninsula (Spain). before the ice melts Marmara Sea was a plane then water level rose up and sink it. The great flood in the bible was exactly that event. also the autor is trying to paint like poles aren't slavic.
Have you gues seen this? sciencenordic.com/scandinavians-are-earliest-europeans
Viktor Andersson it means that they are less evolved peripheral version of humanity.
bgcvetan Who? What? Explain?
@ bgcvetan...i like this one better, although i would put the start somewhere in ireland
Thanks, very brief summary.
my uncle is an R-DF101 - what can you say about that ?
Newgrange in Ireland is older than 5000 years, looks like you forgot the Irish Celts.
In France there are Celtic monuments which are almost 10,000 years old ...
@@litogor there’s no point in making things up that’s just straight up wrong
Yes, there certainly is an Indo-Mediterranean section of the European race, WTF!? It's the largest part of the European race, the original part from which the others come. It includes Arabs, many Berbers, many Southern Europeans, IRANIANS and North Indians. They are a huge group of people.
No,
Medditerenean subrace(Slavs, Iberians, Italians, Greeks) are different of Saracen subrace(Semites, Jews, Berbers, Turkish, Iranians) and Indian subrace.
This is great, as simple as it is. Tell me just this, could Veneti be people with Indoeuropean and I2 genes, before most of them mixed with Celts and got Germanic people? In their preserved culture you can see Indoeuropean, but i dubt that they are just that.
Where do T1a1 come from ?
The Celtiberians in Spain were part Celtic and part Iberian. The Iberians were Middle Eastern people (related to Chechens) who brought agriculture to Spain. They were partly Basque in language and culture through intermarriage. The Tartessians were Celtiberians mixed with Berbers from Morocco.
For fuck sake...
Can someone ban this guy...
You're ignorance is kill me...
Iberians are chechens...
Tartessian are celtiberian...
They were there centuries before the arrival of celt's...
Read a fucking history book for fuck sake...
Let's ban you because you are a Troll that explains nothing. You're the one who sounds Stupid, not me. Go support Franco, greaseball.
54markl
I'm not spanish greaseball
54markl
No let's ban you for trying invent peoples history!!!
Do you really think you know more then historians of these countries?
You are not a historian of that country. I have studied history constantly for 50 years, have you? Tell me why I'm wrong instead of acting like A Troll!
Europeans are descendants of Atlantis.
no
yasss hahaha I wanna know where is Atlantis..!! I read that it was near Southern Spain, near Cadis (a coast city) 💁 i'm Spanish from BCN~
Atlantis are of a Libyan race.
Doggerland
@hunter christensen LoL
This video is pretty cool~ Haha I was shooked seing that in 0:11 The here is where I live (Barcelona) lol haha yasss
Im confused. Where’s Schytian / Sarmatian ? Tocharian ?
How were Britain and Ireland magically changing in sync with modern Europe before people knew how to make boats?
I know you've based this entirely off of male genome, which makes it inaccurate anyway, but Britain and Ireland have distinct male genomes from the rest of Europe, so you haven't even done it right following that method.
After watching the video and reading a lot of these comments I've come to the conclusion that nobody really knows where the hell Europeans came from. How about outer space? ;-)
from all over middle east, africa and asia. all accept I haplogroup.
from where that "I" haplogroup came from? that area was all snow and ice, no food... only if they knew how to make snowball sandwiches and ice bbq i can understand... but again, from where they found wood to make fire and clothes? or if they was not so smart to know for fire and how to make clothing, they maybe didnt need it, also food? like astronots who fly trough van alen belt to the moon they didnt know that radiation exist there so they didnt need protection as today is badly needed for travel to the mars... :)
Zo Mi there's ways to live amongst ice lol
Druže Tito
haplogroup i1 comes from j haplogroup and j haplogroup is middle eastern origin so half of northern Europeans come from middle eastern farmers
I know the official version but it is wrong. actually it's complete bullshit..
Name of the music?
Thanks for this
Hey, good vid besides you're missing a few migrants. Specifically from the haplogroups g, j and e. e has heavy influence in the balkans and southern italy while g, j and possibly an early r1b had influences in the larger i groups. Their spread from the middle east and possibly north africa could be the reason why europe had agriculture prior to the r expansion.
Sean Foley situation there was extremally complex and it is simple clip :)
I2 Y-chromosome marker is actually older than I1 marker. And the home I hapolgroup is the Balkans where it was one of the last Ice Age refuges. After the ice started receding the people from the Balkans (carriers of the I haplogroup) started colonizing Europe and spread from central up to northern Europe (Scandinavia). In fact the people in the Balkans still have the highest percentage of I haplogroup carriers in the world...it is especially present in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzgovina where it reaches extremely high percentages...highest percentage recorded so far among one population is among Croats of Bosnia-Herzegovina (probably also Dalmatia) where it reaches staggering 70-75%.
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Europe_Y-DNA..jpg
I haplogroup is also the only actual European Y-chromosome marker because the mutation developed solely in Europe and was not brought in by migrants and thus is considered the only true European marker.
+Joe Kerr bosnia-herzegovina and albania.
+armando kamberaj Nope. Albania has dominant E haplogroup marker and very low percentages of I haplotype compared to Croatia and/or Bosnia-Herzegovina. The I haplogroup is especially prominent among Croats in Dalmatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina where it reaches over 70%. In Albania the marker is around 25% at maximum.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_I-M170#Distribution
The most dominant marker among Albanians is the E haplogroup where it makes around 30% in Albania, 35% among Macedonian Albanians and it peaks among Kosovo Albanians at 46%.
www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_E1b1b_Y-DNA.shtml
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_E-V68#E-V13
The E haplogroup is actually the youngest haplogroup to come into Europe from Africa.
Joe Kerr what difference does it make what the mutation rate was? I1 was for a long time a very isolated line until about 4500 year ago when it expanded. I1 ultimately derives from I*, the previous one, as does I2.
Also, they are not the only native European Y-DNA, certain types of C are also European. La Brana man had C and it's still around in trace amounts.
+mish & lakna pasul Ask me if I care. The point is - it's not European and thus the claim how Albanians are supposedly are"Illyrians" is completely debunked by genetics. Not to mention we don't even know who the fck Illyrians were or even in what branch of Indo-European languages it belonged...if it even was a Indo-European language. And furthermore...this Y-marker is virtually non-existent to the north...reaching max 4-5% at best if that.
+Archduke Quite the opposite. Are you an idiot?
What about 5th century AD where Slavic people mix with Germanic on the west and Celtic+Illyrian on the south
1. Due to political reasons terms "armenoids" and "armenian highland" was ignorantly renamed to "anatolian" and "anatolia" which means "east" and as a geographic direction it's ridiculous to define as an apart geographic name.
2. Considering that R1a(slavonic) is a late mutation from R1b whichever language they spoke(indo-european in this case) consequently it must have been inherited from the same source R1b (so called "anatolians").
But despite this two error the material is quite substantial.
The Thracian's have been around for 10,000 years. You screwed up on that one. As a matter of fact they were smelting and making gold artifacts well before Egypt. You also missed the Tocharians that migrated to what is now China/Mongolia. 5000 to 6000 years ago.And the Minoans are a European peoples that had been on Thera and Crete for many thousands of years. I think the reason their was so many people with reddish hair in Greece and surrounding areas, also the Mycenaean people had red and fair hair. Even many of the Greek gods have reddish or fair hair. Herodotus writes that the Thracian's are the most populous of all the peoples. And they had fire red hair and blue eyes. The Tocharian Mummies that are found in the Tarim basin China had basically red hair, though some like Chechen man and his wife had blonde hair. Even the paintings on the silk road, have mostly red hair. The Thracians spread their genes all over the world.
Tocharians were came from Anatolian in fact proto Indo-European people were came from Anatolian because Luwian language same Tocharian language ok
R1B are indoeuropeans too.
Right bro. But he uploaded it wrong.
Part 2, please.
Just warned to correct you, Anatolian farmers were mostly G and J not R1b. Anyways good video.
update: oldest human footprints (some 35000 years old) found in cave in Romania, so nowhere near Western Europe
"and for some reason indo european language spread" gtfo have you ever heard of a horse?
Love the music.
The Vanilli (Lombards) were the Little Vandals, an offshoot. They also came from the Veneds. I am a Lombard.
Did u forget ireland????
They come from the middle east but mixed with anglo saxtons, illyrians, spaniards and somerhing else
I welcome every kind effort for such video but man... Do you really start about the history of Europe and Greece is barely included only through its northern part of Macedonia? Come on :P Where is Crete and the Aegean islands where the Minoan and the Mycenaean, the most advanced civilizations of the ancient times begun? The beginning of the Greek and the whole western civilization as we know it is not even included on the map? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_civilization. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycenaean_Greece
Some white nationalists don't consider Greek or Russians to be "real" Europeans.
That's their mental problem, what you want us to do about it?
Θεοδωρής Τσιαμίτας nothing but you asked why Greece is not included. So I have you a possible reason.
I just made an obvious remark about how inaccurate this video is, in such a fundamental level.
Θεοδωρής Τσιαμίτας - Read the title of the video. It's about Europe, not any specific territory within. How much time can be devoted to each area in a two minute video? No room for egotism.
The oldest wheel was found in Slovenia. It was 5150yeas old.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ljubljana_Marshes_Wheel
Mmm.. I'm pretty sure the first picture of the glacier is that of Perito Moreno in Argentina. Not Europe!
Io nn c ho capito un cazzo
And basque people Who is an genetical exception ?
About Baltic it's not correct. Because Baltic population even today contain the most of WHG genetics. Finougric genetics was later additions.
Music?
Turkey is not Europe!!!!!
Europe is not a continent. It's connected to the Asia
Except the part of Turkey that is in Europe, right!
You could say the same for Asia, right! I guess they had to draw the lines somewhere.
T.O.P white nationalists care. They are very peculiar on who are the real white europeans
T.O.P Turks came at that region after 1400 AC, the regions there were mostly Greek.
Macedonians are not separate people. They are Greeks. Those who call themselves "Macedonias" today are Slavs.
Greece Propaganda lol
DNA shows Macedonians are directly related to the early Macedonians
@@georgekozaroski327 You are not related to the Macedonians who were/are Greeks. Your Macedonianism was invented by Tito and the Comintern. You've got to face reality, my friend.
@@contemporary1116 We’re taught in the rest of world that the ancient Macedonians were Greek and that only North Macedonia has manipulated their history much like North Korea. This has been proven through DNA tests. I’m an American btw.
Short and sweet! Thank you! Really nice and compact, so I'll probably watch it again a few times!
Some Indo-European speaking populations spread much later than 1700 BCE, actually probably most of central and western European IE speakers.
Italic speakers reached Italy around 1100 BCE, the Celts spread out throughout central and western Europe between 1200 and 600 BCE, and the Germanic speakers were confined to the North Sea and Baltic coasts between 1500 and 500 BCE and started spreading out only between 500 and 100 BCE.
Iranian peoples in eastern Europe were more dominant than Slavs until about 300 CE, until then, Slavs and Balts were contained in small enclaves in and around present-day Belarus.
+Eli Malinsky Oh, and I forgot to note that researchers do not equate genetic distribution with language and culture. These are complete separate understandings of human populations.
In fact, the Indo-European genetic markers have yet to be identified. R1a and R1b have be proven to be much older in their geographic distribution than the expansion of Indo-European speakers across Eurasia.
R1b is not indoeuropean..G2 and G1 also, R2 similar,E1b1b, E1a1a, E1a1b and E1b1a.E2a1,E2a1b,E2b1,E2b2 and J2(a and b in fact F)or K3(T3),K2(T2)and also N1b (N2)and N1c(N3) also not....I1 and I2a2 and I2a1 and I2b where also not until around 1900 - 1850BC when they where mostly indoeuropenaised by speakers with R1a.. only R1a is in fact truly indoeuropean....dispite that like R1b,R2,veriusG,.J2a,J2b,K3.K2(T3.T2)veriusE and N2 and N3 ,R1a came from Eurasia in that fact only I(I1,I2a2,I2a1especialyI2b) is truly from Europe but indoeuropean was from R1a....
Haplogroups P1a and R1b spread from Kurgan culture originated north of the Caucasus.
Only R1a came out only from the Kurgan culture.R1b is strictly western European, and the maximum concentration is in the west of Europe, and the maximum concentration of R1a is in the East of Europe.The Kurgan culture spread only R1a not R1b.
Nope. In fact Yamanaya were all R1b.
LIar.
Macedonian DNA doesn’t exist you mean Greek DNA
you mean Indoeuropean DNA
Song name ?
Awesome! Thank you.
For the very first time a map that says truth. Due to Ice Age all modern Europeans descend from Spain. And every summer Europeans back to the mother land. Hahaha!
And Russia, and Anatolia, and the Caucasus
LOL well that's the bigest BS i have seen lately.
Markus Laslo ?
you're right, the original europeans were blonde haired and blue eyed, not the way the pictures showed them at the start of the video. Mutation happened in humans that had already race mixed
"mutation" is the process that takes place gradually throughout someone's lifetime after race mixing took place. Brown hair is a mutation. Dark blonde hair is a mutation. Red hair is a mutation. Ginger hair is a mutation.
Mutation according to google:
"the *changing* of the structure of a gene, resulting in a *variant*
form that may be transmitted to subsequent generations, caused by the alteration of single base units in DNA, or the deletion, insertion, or
rearrangement of *larger sections of genes* or chromosomes."
"resulting in a variant form" is what happens from race mixing.
More google definiiton:
"a distinct form *resulting from a change* in the structure of a gene."
So basically, if - the original prototype of the white human and the original prototype, of any other type, of human - mix races and have multiple offsprings, the offsprings will *all* look different, and their genes will mutate during their lifetime. their hair may become lighter or darker, their skin may become lighter or darker and i think their eye colour/s as well.
one offspring may look like this s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/74/77/fb/7477fb07f49302a3c0775704ef496358.jpg
one offspring may look like this www.konbini.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/3/files/2015/08/ok-810x492.jpg
and one offspring may even look like this img.usmagazine.com/article-leads-vertical-300/1312909609_liam-hemsworth-402.jpg
Incorrect. Many of the old natives of Europe were dark haired and pale skinned, and that's in Scandinavia.
Final Fantasy 12 music?
You just do not get it. The "Some reason..." in 1:48 was that R1a was here first and it was vast. And one more: they are no Germanic people - they are just mixture of R1a and R1b. I know it is hard for you to superimpose old presumed anthropological maps with the true science of DNA.