Can a depth of 22mm detect the peri-apical pathologies like a cyst ,granuloma or a tumour in a face scanner in it's trough? To what extent does it's resolution suffice?
Similar. You pay more for the RayFace but it has one click operation - this is probably the biggest advantage. Otherwise Metismile is a great option too for a lower price point if you don’t mind the manual operation
@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry one click operation is great. Do you think that a patient can maintain face smile for more than 1-2 seconds without moving any muscle ? Impossibile.....rayface cost much more but its quality and speed worth it every dollar-euro, especially if you use face scan to work and not to make show
@@marcoval71 Agreed. We love one click operation. It also comes at a cost. Have you used the Shining product however? The software does an excellent job overlaying the different images and giving a single smile at end.
I've tried almost all the face scanner on the market included iPhone-iPad app.....considering,quality,operator time,learning curve and IOS superimposing protocol without any doubt rayface 200 is my choice. I am a trios user and IOS user since 2014, I definitely work with digital dentistry, and time is very important.....
@@marcoval71 We like the RayFace too :) These two face scanners are our favorite. You should check out our rayface review instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/facial-scanner/rayface-review-the-best-facial-scanner-for-dentists/
Can a depth of 22mm detect the peri-apical pathologies like a cyst ,granuloma or a tumour in a face scanner in it's trough? To what extent does it's resolution suffice?
No. It just takes facial scans.
Can a Meti-smile oro-facial scanner replace a tomogram?
No, there are no penetrating waves. Its a camera.
Great! Review! How is the MetiSmile scanner compared to the RayFace? Both on the same level?
Similar. You pay more for the RayFace but it has one click operation - this is probably the biggest advantage.
Otherwise Metismile is a great option too for a lower price point if you don’t mind the manual operation
@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry one click operation is great. Do you think that a patient can maintain face smile for more than 1-2 seconds without moving any muscle ? Impossibile.....rayface cost much more but its quality and speed worth it every dollar-euro, especially if you use face scan to work and not to make show
@@marcoval71 Agreed. We love one click operation. It also comes at a cost.
Have you used the Shining product however? The software does an excellent job overlaying the different images and giving a single smile at end.
I've tried almost all the face scanner on the market included iPhone-iPad app.....considering,quality,operator time,learning curve and IOS superimposing protocol without any doubt rayface 200 is my choice. I am a trios user and IOS user since 2014, I definitely work with digital dentistry, and time is very important.....
@@marcoval71 We like the RayFace too :) These two face scanners are our favorite.
You should check out our rayface review instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/facial-scanner/rayface-review-the-best-facial-scanner-for-dentists/
Exciting times ahead for digital workflows in cosmetic dentistry!
Totally agree! These are exciting times for the entire industry, to be fair!
Are you really sure this is a geometrical correct merging of IOS, CBCT and RS ? Correct xyz data?
It works when we align it to the IOS and CBCT.
@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry Sure - got it - but is it geometrically correct? You did not answer my question...? Thanks for clarification
@@ROSEMA-jo8eo yes it is. I will post a deeper dive review comparing a few different face scanners on instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/blog soon