วีดีโอ

For dental professionals

Things are going to get better soon :)

Helios 500 is similar to AS 100 which used to be sold as the Helios 600. Both are decent enough scanners. Helios 100 is the most economical option on the market. AS 260 is slightly different in terms of its proposition and has more developed software etc. Currently reviewing the Helios 500 and will release full review soon

Both are good frankly. Shining has argubably better software apps but alliedstar is catching up. Try both and see what you like more.

Different beasts. AS 100 is not really pushed as much anymore and you would want to go for the AS 260 at least. Both scan well frankly. Shining has more developed software but Alliedstar is being improved very quickly. Try both, see what you like more. Both are great.

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry thanks , but in there is difference between allied star a260 and shining 3d price as allied is more expensive and as100 is almost as same as shining price .. So you advice me to buy shining ??

Helios 600 is an alliedstar rebrand. Helios 500 is the companies own intraoral scanner. Helios 600 (AS 100) is now owned by straumann and will slowly stop being made I think for Helios as the company pushes the AS brand. Otherwise, both seem capable of a low-cost scanner.

Totally different. Check out our reviews for details instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/category/intraoral-scanner-reviews/

There is always some deviation when you do what is essentially free-hand but with navigation. I think this is better than most can do completely free hand :)

We have been using it pretty heavily in our clinic and lab, and what I will say is that Ultra is not a super fast printer like what Sprintray and the new Formlabs are pushing. Models etc take 1.5-2x longer than some of those printers. Nor is it the easiest to use, like Formlabs. But it has unmatched print quality. This is why labs love it. You see this when printing dies and how they fit in the model, all on x restorations without distortion of holes, etc. Even models, you often can't see any printing lines, etc. Also, the Ultra has a huge build platform, so you get around the speed a little bit by being able to print many models at once. I think it is hard to beat Asiga for print quality and results. I believe each one of those printers is strong in this current market, and each has its place. Sprintray does extremely well in chairside thanks to its overall workflow, wash and cure (nanocure is epic). Formlabs is also coming back with the 4B which is much, much faster than previous SLA. Hope that helps :)

32gb

Both are decent low-cost intraoral scanners from China. I would say Runyes currently has the better software overall. Whereas Panda Smart has the size advantage.

Best way to decide what would be best for you is try both and make an informed decision :)

Thanks for your kind reply .. But I am confused .. I will try them . But there is another scanner called ( QSCAN 7000 xpect vision) .. Do you know about it ?? Another question, is Medit i600 over all these scanners ??

@@DrKerolusmagid medit is by far the most developed in terms of software and overall workflows. If you just want a scanner for basic indications they will literally all work (single crown etc). QSCAN 7000 is a white labeled Runyes scanner. What you buy depends on how much you want to spend, what you want from scanner software and if you want to do more complicated scans like edentulous, all on x etc. Check out all our reviews here for more info: instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/category/intraoral-scanner-reviews/

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry QSCAN 7000 really is Rebranding for Runyes ?? There is difference in price here in egypt .. so what Runyes will do QSCAN will do ?? My work is crowns & bridges , simple implant not complicated , scanning cases not complicated ..

Check our reviews! We have covered these scanners already: instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/helios-600-intraoral-scanner-review/ instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/cad-cam/aoralscan-3-scanner-review-the-latest-ios-by-shining-3d/ Note - the Helios 600 was a rebadged Alliedstar scanner. The company no longer works with Helios to make these, and Helios now makes the Helios 500.

Yes, we have been using it quite heavily for the past 3 months or so. I have to say I really like this printer, and my lab team does too. It's fast, prints nicely, and is quite easy to use. The build quality is solid and impressive for its relatively low cost. Quality is high, but I think the top price still goes to Asiga Ultra at the moment. In saying that this is once again very good for the price tag. The only downside I see at the moment is limited resins, but the company says they are addressing this soon.

Both are good in their own right. Different software advantages. Medit i600 is a great low-cost option, and so is Aoralscan 3. I would suggest try both and see what you prefer.

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry Many tanks sir I'm great full 😌 About medit 600 no HD mode and no oral health report but a solid software

@@HakimHakim-ek2yn I dont use HD mode :)

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry Tank u very much Dr

We will show it in our full review of the scanner coming soon

We have been involved in the feedback process to the company of P3 and generally I would recommend Panda Smart over P3 for sure.

Not this one but the updated one goes straight to PC

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry Yup, and no need for the dongle as well. Its been a nice investment so far.

@@KukieMann nice!

Check this - www.straumann.com/content/dam/media-center/digital/en/documents/brochure/product-information/490.710-en_low.pdf I would just get their new scanner instead of Vivo to be frank.

Thank you for your kind words! Appreciate it :) My passion is digital dentistry so unfortunately I don't think I will go over curing lights etc any time soon - I am plenty busy with all the new scanners and printers coming out!

Beating in which sense? There is no perfect scanner, it is all about workflow and software and what you want to achieve with it. Primescan is the best for CEREC chairside workflow. This could be interesting when they integrate exocad one day.

yes it can be used for model scanning

What do you mean sorry?

Not the first no. There were others before it, namely the WOW scanner (which seems to be discontinued for now). I don't believe in 'game changers' It is a nice product for iTero, but it is not suddenly going to dethrone the other top scanners that have worked very well for years.

@@metsatsu3017 I believe it uses a form of stereophotogrammetry Not the first scanner, that was the WOW scanner from some time ago. This does seem like pulling it off much better as the wow left a lot to be desired in scan speed etc

I expect big changes since the purchase of Alliedstar

How much it cost

@@ZlDarkHz123 instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/panda-smart-review-the-smallest-and-most-lightweight-intraoral-scanner/ 12800 USD

Thanks!

No the medit i500 does not work with mac

both are good scanners frankly. Medit has more developed software but Shining 3D is catching up. I would suggest try both and see which you like.

Is it a white labeled HELIOS 500 scanner. We haven not yet reviewed it. I have personally used it and its OK for a entry level product

Oh wow. I didn’t even know that. They do look exactly the same and even the software looks the same. Could you tell me how it could be inferior to others because it seems it can do everything without a limitation besides itero being exclusive for invisalign. My main reason for buying a scanner is full arch restoration (10 crown preps on each arch), to take bite registration, and also to do some implant restorations and scan for diagnostic models.

@@JoonKimDMD for scanning alone it is fine. software is nothing like medit, shining etc. its just a low cost scanning tool. I would suggest try before you buy and see if you like it.

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry What software feature can we expect by choosing medit, or shining over S200? If all I want is to scan accurately, fast, and save it as STL, would S200 be as good as the others?

@@JoonKimDMD To do simple tasks like this all work well. Medit software is more polished that is all with more features But Shining has been working hard to catch up.

We have another video on a live patient coming up. This is just the unboxing. Regarding FPS, this was a beta version during testing. So it have improved and been optimized.

Thank you. I only used the original and the 3.0. I think the difference between 2.0 and 3.0 was mainly nomenclature but when in doubt I would always just get the latest one.

Check this instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/aoralscan-3-scanner-review-the-latest-ios-by-shining-3d/#t-1606306693156

Both are good scanners, and it's a close call. I think as an overall product TRIOS Core wins as it has a much more developed software suite, software implant workflows and is better at edentulous scanning (so your all on x cases). In saying that, Aoralscan is also close to 2k cheaper. As always try both at your next conference/expo in your region and that is the best way to pick. See what you like. Hope that helps :)

my pleasure!

It is greatly improved. I think these days it is better to go for Alliedstar which is owned by Straumann now though.

I would highly recommend *against* doing this. Many scammers out there and support is critical with any IOS device. I suggest you contact your local (reputable) distributor or representative for the company and buy from them

The dental clinicians win :)

Thank you Medit.

@@HanaMontana-qk4ok haha no doubt those 2 companies have influenced each other a lot.

Great technique no doubt! Next you should do reviews 🤝

Panda SMART review coming very soon!! Yes the main advantage of i900 is speed and size. It is the most lightweight scanner on the market now. Even less weight than Panda. Also the Medit software is a huge advantage over most scanners.

We have a full breakdown on the TRIOS 3 refresh here th-cam.com/video/2hXSvfoMxj8/w-d-xo.html

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry I know ;-)

@@AlexanderKnobel 🙏🙏

How much is that ?

It is coming! Once we get our hands on it :)

@@mikeizack3070 I believe around 6k USD

@@mikeizack3070 i got it for 400000INR around 4800usd in India with a MSI laptop

In the USA, helio500 is called atomica s200 and I am looking to get this one soon.

Yes no problem. All sent via Medit software or exported and sent manually.

No doubt amazing patient engagement tools in the iTero

The shape of the connector is different apparently, so this is why the cables are not interchangeable.

The i700 wire can be used with i900. But not the otherway around apparently. Will have to try it.

Permanent crown resin strength depends on the resin manufacturer. It ranges from about 80 MPA on the low end (temp crowns) and ~200 MPA on the higher end.

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry obviously i meant sprint resin ceramic crown

@@ValhallaGuild my bad 😅answering this from an airplane between conferences so lost the context... Flexural Strength 136 MPA Shear Bond Strength 34.7 MPA Flexural Modulus 7.6 GPa

😂😅