I really appreciate the art and how good the song is made (despite the low quality mastering, although I'm starting to like it for that, not sure if it was intended to sound bad) and pulling off 3 time signatures seamlessly in 1 song and making it work well together is pure talent 👏 👏 👏 and that's not even getting to the sound of the tune.. Great tune!
Quality? You mean the sound quality, if so, I will say talent, or the main musical objective as it pertains to the overall experience of the band/project/album supersedes any kind of audio perfection, or studio "quality". Otherwise, DIY bands that do not even use professional studios just wouldn't count, so that logic is failed. Almost all the bands I listen to value content over studio quality. Anyone can polish a turd (musically), but you can really tell with musicians in the past like Elliott Smith or stuff like that, that all they needed was a microphone, and an acoustic guitar and their voice, and they tended to sound better than full bands inside of expensive studios, so that is my point. Or bands like Fugazi, Wipers, and other DIY type bands that value content over studio quality. Anyway, studio quality is subjective, as I would not want my music to sound overproduced, so it all boils down to perception, preference, and why one plays music in the first place, whether it be for the love and passion of the music, or for maximization of revenue, which ONLY then with maximization of revenue could I understand the need for overly produced music. At that rate though, you can have no ability to sing whatsoever, no ability to play any instruments, and have no ability to write lyrics, yet have a number one "music" hit somehow, so that alone is enough to not give a crap about studio quality. Who is that for anyway, not for the musicians with a vision, a vision that does not involve appealing to and appeasing random strangers that do not share the same vision.
![Nymb - Novembre [EP] (1998) Full](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MjM948HRxu4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Nymb - Novembre [EP] (1998) Full](/img/tr.png)
![Ozean Band - Ozean [1993] Full Album](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P1CHFDCCBEI/mqdefault.jpg)
Im absolutely loving these gems I’m finding, especially when they’re long, straight fire🔥
What a banger
The strongest man……. In the wooorld
Such a good song
I really appreciate the art and how good the song is made (despite the low quality mastering, although I'm starting to like it for that, not sure if it was intended to sound bad) and pulling off 3 time signatures seamlessly in 1 song and making it work well together is pure talent 👏 👏 👏 and that's not even getting to the sound of the tune.. Great tune!
this art is from their 2006 self-titled record, an absolute masterpiece
Found another gem 🔥
this is so good
Who up jiggling that thang
i feel starflyer 59
fire
a mako mim indico esse som
info on this band?
www.discogs.com/artist/71734-Polaris-4
For real, there’s like 2 other bands with the same name lol
@@thetengumusic6731 I replied with the discogs link but youtube blacklisted it I think so look up Polaris (4) on there
Noice
low quality, why is this being boosted?
here's the released version th-cam.com/video/ZUoroosq8wU/w-d-xo.html
Quality? You mean the sound quality, if so, I will say talent, or the main musical objective as it pertains to the overall experience of the band/project/album supersedes any kind of audio perfection, or studio "quality". Otherwise, DIY bands that do not even use professional studios just wouldn't count, so that logic is failed. Almost all the bands I listen to value content over studio quality. Anyone can polish a turd (musically), but you can really tell with musicians in the past like Elliott Smith or stuff like that, that all they needed was a microphone, and an acoustic guitar and their voice, and they tended to sound better than full bands inside of expensive studios, so that is my point. Or bands like Fugazi, Wipers, and other DIY type bands that value content over studio quality. Anyway, studio quality is subjective, as I would not want my music to sound overproduced, so it all boils down to perception, preference, and why one plays music in the first place, whether it be for the love and passion of the music, or for maximization of revenue, which ONLY then with maximization of revenue could I understand the need for overly produced music. At that rate though, you can have no ability to sing whatsoever, no ability to play any instruments, and have no ability to write lyrics, yet have a number one "music" hit somehow, so that alone is enough to not give a crap about studio quality. Who is that for anyway, not for the musicians with a vision, a vision that does not involve appealing to and appeasing random strangers that do not share the same vision.