To be fair to Andy, the question was, "How do you eat your strawberries?" NOT "What do you eat WITH your strawberries?" I think the answer to the second question would have been just as fun. 😊
I always wonder that with so many other players with even more Grand Slam victories and better game quality than Murray, are never considered as belonging the top group, and Murray is. Murray is too tall, heavy built (he is literally disassembling himself just to keep it going with his kind of "mountaineer" physic), not even that particularly "brilliant" or "exceptional" player, 2 or 3 Grand Slam titles, ridiculous when compared to Federer (20 Grand slam titles), Djokovic (21 Grand slam titles) or Nadal (22 Grand slam titles)... And the english media pump Murray up all the time, like... Murray "belongs" up there with them... when in reality when we take a closer look at Murray's titles, ok he's a reasonable high quality player... but with 3 grand slam titles... he never was even close to be part of the top 3 quality 🤔 It also comes to my mind that Andy it's Scottish and not English. And the English media are fast at converting any high, medium or low successful Irish or Scottish in a Englishman and a Sir... 🤣 Murray it's being (and always has been) literally carried around by the english press, main reason being no english players at the top of the ATP circuit for a long time, and when they get there, it's for a very brief time, and they always kind-of look like they belong more to the 5 o'clock Tea Party at Wimbledon than at the top of the Tennis competition (Tim Henman was a good example of it, and compared to Tim, even a "mountaineer" like Murray looks far better... but still...). Murray's participation in the Laver Cup was a good example of someone that doesn't belong there even less now.
46 titles + 3 grand slams + 2 olympic gold medals + 11 finals + Years end no. 1 in 2016 + One atp world tour finals win + 14 masters titles. Hes only like this because of the countless injury hes had throughout his 2016-2017 career and even now he is still winning a bit. So, yes he is not at his prime and never will be but he does have every right to be considered the “big 4” he has accomplished many things that many of the other big three weren’t able to, and yes, maybe he isn’t as skilled as federer or as fast as nadal or just as good as novak but he has other things that make up for that. You saying that english media carried him to be a better player then he actually is, is just plain bullshit. TBH you’re the type of person to say that alcaraz is the goat because you made this one dumbass statement
@@dabru6864 No Tonto. But I'm the kind of person to compare Murray's career (overboosted in England, despite the fact that he's actually Scottish... right?) on any standards good but of medium quality success when compared to 91 ATP singles titles, including 21 Grand Slam singles titles (compare Andy's "fantastic" "3" grand slam titles...), six ATP Finals titles, and a record 38 ATP Masters titles... (I don't need to name the player I'm talking about) So... Andy is not at all thaaat OMG great (as I said, maybe in England he gets to be a OMG, where you have so many tennis players but definitely not much "real" game beyond the snob club approach...) But really, Andy Murray is top.... but a pretty regular average top... How about make of Stan Wawrinka a "Sir" too? he has a identical career as Andy. Maybe Wawrinka was just born in the wrong country. Would he be born in England and with a more "british" name and Stan Wawrinka would be the local cult too and a "Sir".🤣 Satisfied?
@@paulobastos1774 okay i can see what you are getting at. The fact that he is slightly overrated. However, At the time of 2012-2016 he was around the same level. So its only now that he is overrated. Also im pretty sure he is overboosted by the news because he is scottish, but doesnt he represent that country?? And i think right now h isnt considered big 4. Also wawrinka had net achieved much compared to murray. He only won around 10-20 titles which was only half of murray’s 46. Sure, he is overrated but that doesn’t make him not to be considered part of the big 4
Yeah cos you aren’t a great player if you win 3 grand slams are world number 1 during an era with 3 of the greatest ever. That’s why he gets respect now bore off clown.
@@davidlockhart7346 ahahahah Yeah... Aham... Lockart baby, I think most of us know how Murray by accident ended up as number 1 just for a few months... and we all also why he was gone after those few months, to never come back again as number 1 (and "if" such a "great" player, Murray would be able to do it a few times, right?... Wrong :)) If not for the local Brit press in constant deluded "hurrahs"... Murray would be as anonymous as so many other that managed to be number 1... just for a few months in their whole careers... and even win 2 or 3 Grand Slam titles.🤣
Nah him and kyrigos on the rollercoaster is iconic 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Genuinely gutted he only managed 23 seconds hula hooping. What a fucking boy!! 🤣
This should have been 60+ mins longer!
This very British sense of humor 👌 Dry and effortless. Love it 🙌
The 'with my fingers' might be the funniest response in human history
Omg he is so adorable! I'm in love 🤣🤣
I'm glad someone made this because I think this guy's hilarious :D
He’s hilarious and not boring in any fashion.
3:56 savage medvedev 💀
He's kinda funny without being funny 😂
20+ grand slam champion, had there not been the three other guys.
To be fair to Andy, the question was, "How do you eat your strawberries?" NOT "What do you eat WITH your strawberries?" I think the answer to the second question would have been just as fun. 😊
Gael's laugh !!
Wonderful funny guy
Very funny video mate.Keep it up
Monifls got revenge in Indian Wells!
Funny) and very informative))
Excuse me I need a 20 min toilet break. BRB.
I think is so funny ,its just doesnt know about it!
0:10 lol so awkward
So cute🫣
👍
Just Scottish
Ma io lo amo dhsjdjsjwja
Wtf - a nightmare!
Hes from Scotland but doesn't sound Scottish
Posh
I always wonder that with so many other players with even more Grand Slam victories and better game quality than Murray, are never considered as belonging the top group, and Murray is.
Murray is too tall, heavy built (he is literally disassembling himself just to keep it going with his kind of "mountaineer" physic), not even that particularly "brilliant" or "exceptional" player, 2 or 3 Grand Slam titles, ridiculous when compared to Federer (20 Grand slam titles), Djokovic (21 Grand slam titles) or Nadal (22 Grand slam titles)... And the english media pump Murray up all the time, like... Murray "belongs" up there with them... when in reality when we take a closer look at Murray's titles, ok he's a reasonable high quality player... but with 3 grand slam titles... he never was even close to be part of the top 3 quality 🤔
It also comes to my mind that Andy it's Scottish and not English. And the English media are fast at converting any high, medium or low successful Irish or Scottish in a Englishman and a Sir... 🤣
Murray it's being (and always has been) literally carried around by the english press, main reason being no english players at the top of the ATP circuit for a long time, and when they get there, it's for a very brief time, and they always kind-of look like they belong more to the 5 o'clock Tea Party at Wimbledon than at the top of the Tennis competition (Tim Henman was a good example of it, and compared to Tim, even a "mountaineer" like Murray looks far better... but still...).
Murray's participation in the Laver Cup was a good example of someone that doesn't belong there even less now.
46 titles + 3 grand slams + 2 olympic gold medals + 11 finals + Years end no. 1 in 2016 + One atp world tour finals win + 14 masters titles. Hes only like this because of the countless injury hes had throughout his 2016-2017 career and even now he is still winning a bit. So, yes he is not at his prime and never will be but he does have every right to be considered the “big 4” he has accomplished many things that many of the other big three weren’t able to, and yes, maybe he isn’t as skilled as federer or as fast as nadal or just as good as novak but he has other things that make up for that. You saying that english media carried him to be a better player then he actually is, is just plain bullshit.
TBH you’re the type of person to say that alcaraz is the goat because you made this one dumbass statement
@@dabru6864 No Tonto. But I'm the kind of person to compare Murray's career (overboosted in England, despite the fact that he's actually Scottish... right?) on any standards good but of medium quality success when compared to 91 ATP singles titles, including 21 Grand Slam singles titles (compare Andy's "fantastic" "3" grand slam titles...), six ATP Finals titles, and a record 38 ATP Masters titles... (I don't need to name the player I'm talking about)
So... Andy is not at all thaaat OMG great (as I said, maybe in England he gets to be a OMG, where you have so many tennis players but definitely not much "real" game beyond the snob club approach...) But really, Andy Murray is top.... but a pretty regular average top...
How about make of Stan Wawrinka a "Sir" too? he has a identical career as Andy. Maybe Wawrinka was just born in the wrong country. Would he be born in England and with a more "british" name and Stan Wawrinka would be the local cult too and a "Sir".🤣
Satisfied?
@@paulobastos1774 okay i can see what you are getting at. The fact that he is slightly overrated. However, At the time of 2012-2016 he was around the same level. So its only now that he is overrated. Also im pretty sure he is overboosted by the news because he is scottish, but doesnt he represent that country?? And i think right now h isnt considered big 4. Also wawrinka had net achieved much compared to murray. He only won around 10-20 titles which was only half of murray’s 46. Sure, he is overrated but that doesn’t make him not to be considered part of the big 4
Yeah cos you aren’t a great player if you win 3 grand slams are world number 1 during an era with 3 of the greatest ever. That’s why he gets respect now bore off clown.
@@davidlockhart7346 ahahahah Yeah... Aham... Lockart baby, I think most of us know how Murray by accident ended up as number 1 just for a few months... and we all also why he was gone after those few months, to never come back again as number 1 (and "if" such a "great" player, Murray would be able to do it a few times, right?... Wrong :)) If not for the local Brit press in constant deluded "hurrahs"... Murray would be as anonymous as so many other that managed to be number 1... just for a few months in their whole careers... and even win 2 or 3 Grand Slam titles.🤣