I fully agree, and as a former owner of my beloved '93 SHO (looked exactly like the red one in this video) , the SHO really had no competition.... you had to have driven/owned one to truly understand that. I would buy one in a heart beat if I found one... I sure as shit would not jump to own any of the cars listed as the SHOs "competition". That is all, thanks for reading lol.
LOL @ 4:45. 91Taurus, you reminded me I have a number of Taurus dealer training videos I need to digitize. Just need to figure out the best way to do that. Thanks for posting this!
I will agree that it was rather good at what it did. However, most people today don't know what it is and just see it as an old lady's car. Owning one, I can tell you that there is something about it that makes it so special. You really have to own one and live with it on a day to day basis to understand.
I have both but the Probe tape is something like 45mins long cause it was brand new for 1993. It'd take forever to render that and would use up a ton of my upload allowance for the month
Dude, PLEASE Upload that, or possibly send me a copy if you can. I'm looking to use it to play in my in car entertainment during car shows. I'd LOVE to see that shit and I know the Probe Community would kill for it.
whoohaaXL Alright I'll do it because I'm a car enthusiast first and foremost. But you''ll have to wait a couple weeks till I get some more internets from those bastards I pay every month
I had a 92 Taurus GL 3.0 sedan. Was it a good car? Not by today's standards. Did it need front outer tie rods, lower ball joints, rear strut assemblies? Yep. Was it slow? Yep. But was it easy and comfortable to drive? Yep! Did it give reasonable mileage? Yep. Were the controls simple to operate? Yep. Was the ride nice and was it great for long trips? Yep an yep. I got rid of mine after nearly 200k when the trans finally let go.
I must love this car I have spent way more on the car more than what the market of these cars are worth, mechanically its brand new brakes, clutch, timing belt, most of the sensors, I did the clutch myself and oh man never have I done such a big job had to buy an engine hoist and a slew of other tools needless to say I have VIP at rockauto and Gary from UPS has is married and has two kids 4 and 8 and he loves to go water skiing!!! I do really like the car and its rare to find someone that knows what a 92 SHO is about...... Gary now knows what these cars are........
Lee Reader I've had a 1995 taurus, as well as a 1997,1998,1999, and 2002. Some of the most reliable cars ever made. Just change the fluid/filter and don't beat on it, and them and they'll run forever
@@matt9759 YES! Someone finally gets it. People moan and complain about the Taurus transmissions but do they realize that you can't go past 50,000 miles without changing the fluid/filter on these cars? My aunt's 1992 Mercury Sable LS wagon has over 200,000 miles on it and it still has it's factory transmission with no problems ever.
The Probe was the 1993 Motor Trend Car of the Year. It was introduced in 1989 and was intended to replace the Mustang. There was a massive hue and cry from car enthusiasts, and eventually Ford changed its mind and kept Mustang in production, but still sold the Probe. As fate would have it, Probe was discontinued in 1997.
@@terrance75 also discontinued. But not related in any way. The next generation Probe morphed into the 99 Cougar in an effort to revitalize the Mercury brand. We all know how that went. It would've sold better if it had Ford badging
@1996TaurusMan I can't argue with that. It just seemed odd to me for a V6 to be absent in a car like the Mustang, it kinda seems "all or nothing" if you know what I mean.
And as for it being fast, yes and no. Back then, Yes. It was fast, especially for a family sedan. Nowadays, it really isn't that fast. But it does keep of with the other cars rather well.
Wow, I'm watching this in 2021... This is probably the experience you'd get in 1993 watching vhs tapes about the '64 Ford cars.
4:45 haha the so called theifs reaction to the probes alarm system is just priceless
I fully agree, and as a former owner of my beloved '93 SHO (looked exactly like the red one in this video) , the SHO really had no competition.... you had to have driven/owned one to truly understand that. I would buy one in a heart beat if I found one... I sure as shit would not jump to own any of the cars listed as the SHOs "competition". That is all, thanks for reading lol.
cool rare vintage upload!! Thanks!
LOL @ 4:45. 91Taurus, you reminded me I have a number of Taurus dealer training videos I need to digitize. Just need to figure out the best way to do that. Thanks for posting this!
Nick Myers do you have any Aerostar Promotional Videos
I will agree that it was rather good at what it did. However, most people today don't know what it is and just see it as an old lady's car. Owning one, I can tell you that there is something about it that makes it so special. You really have to own one and live with it on a day to day basis to understand.
Do you have any other ford model line up videos?
This actor did training videos for GM too
Do you have anything on either the Econoline/Club Wagon or F-Series?
Wow on the Taurus, there is no Primus’ Sailing the Seas of Cheese cassette in there.
Do you have the 1993 Probe Training video?
I have both but the Probe tape is something like 45mins long cause it was brand new for 1993. It'd take forever to render that and would use up a ton of my upload allowance for the month
Dude, PLEASE Upload that, or possibly send me a copy if you can. I'm looking to use it to play in my in car entertainment during car shows. I'd LOVE to see that shit and I know the Probe Community would kill for it.
whoohaaXL
Alright I'll do it because I'm a car enthusiast first and foremost. But you''ll have to wait a couple weeks till I get some more internets from those bastards I pay every month
You got it brother, Thanks a million!
whoohaaXL
I used someone else's internet and uploaded the video. Be sure to show the Probe community
Or the Escort 1993 Training?
@Duratec86
I'd be great if you could upload those to youtube. I'd love to see some that I don't have
I had a 92 Taurus GL 3.0 sedan. Was it a good car? Not by today's standards. Did it need front outer tie rods, lower ball joints, rear strut assemblies? Yep. Was it slow? Yep. But was it easy and comfortable to drive? Yep! Did it give reasonable mileage? Yep. Were the controls simple to operate? Yep. Was the ride nice and was it great for long trips? Yep an yep. I got rid of mine after nearly 200k when the trans finally let go.
Ugh, remember when every car came in a wagon version? Now none of them do :(
That was the days before SUVs
Dennis W they had SUVs ever since the 1940's. so that statement is not correct.
I wish they still did. I hate the oversaturation of Crossover SUVs.
i got a 91 mustang LX 5.0 bought it brand new, also a 1992 Taurus SHO 5 speed, for some reason I feel the need for 93 thunderbird super coupe........
Lee Reader
I love the 2nd gen Taurus!
I must love this car I have spent way more on the car more than what the market of these cars are worth, mechanically its brand new brakes, clutch, timing belt, most of the sensors, I did the clutch myself and oh man never have I done such a big job had to buy an engine hoist and a slew of other tools needless to say I have VIP at rockauto and Gary from UPS has is married and has two kids 4 and 8 and he loves to go water skiing!!! I do really like the car and its rare to find someone that knows what a 92 SHO is about...... Gary now knows what these cars are........
Lee Reader
I've had a 1995 taurus, as well as a 1997,1998,1999, and 2002. Some of the most reliable cars ever made. Just change the fluid/filter and don't beat on it, and them and they'll run forever
@@matt9759 YES! Someone finally gets it. People moan and complain about the Taurus transmissions but do they realize that you can't go past 50,000 miles without changing the fluid/filter on these cars? My aunt's 1992 Mercury Sable LS wagon has over 200,000 miles on it and it still has it's factory transmission with no problems ever.
The SHO is a really good car, not because of your opinion, but because of how good it actually is
My Parents had both a '92 Tempo Coupe and '94 Aerostar.
Taurus with smooth shifting transmission?? HA! That's a good one
Yeah it's a good one if you actually bother to change the transmission fluid and filter when you're supposed to.
@ 4:43 the probe is like help me! help me! lol
The Probe was the 1993 Motor Trend Car of the Year. It was introduced in 1989 and was intended to replace the Mustang. There was a massive hue and cry from car enthusiasts, and eventually Ford changed its mind and kept Mustang in production, but still sold the Probe. As fate would have it, Probe was discontinued in 1997.
Ford Probe is now Ford Fusion.
@@terrance75 also discontinued. But not related in any way.
The next generation Probe morphed into the 99 Cougar in an effort to revitalize the Mercury brand. We all know how that went.
It would've sold better if it had Ford badging
You have? That's good, because the SHO was the ULTIMATE performance sedan, and it still is one of the best today
Did it not? The video says it did
I have seen that video. It makes feel all warm and fuzzy on the inside.......lol
@1996TaurusMan I can't argue with that. It just seemed odd to me for a V6 to be absent in a car like the Mustang, it kinda seems "all or nothing" if you know what I mean.
Of course it is a good car, you should see 91Taurus' 1990 Taurus SHO dealer training video
This is the training video for 1992 models, not 1993.
taurusguy95 But it was made a year after the 1992 models went on sale.
Aerostar,Explorer,Bronco?.
This was for passenger cars, they'd have made a separate video for Ford Trucks, vans, etc.
I always liked those Mazda based Escorts
Thanks!
Oh, Ok. are you saying that it actually is very fast?
I guess thats why it says "Presenting Ford Cars in 1993", and they showcase the all new1993 Probe.......because they're really 1992's
That is true
Ooooh Ford, you used to be so much better. What the fuck is an EcoSport? :(
Ford has been shit after the mid and late 2000s.
All these cars were thoroughly competitive, except the damn Tempo. Why didn't they try harder?
The SHO had no real competition......haha
So you can't get a 4 cylinder Taurus, but you CAN get a 4 cylinder Mustang? What??
You could get a 4 cyl Taurus from 86-91.
And as for it being fast, yes and no. Back then, Yes. It was fast, especially for a family sedan. Nowadays, it really isn't that fast. But it does keep of with the other cars rather well.
The probe seats are NAPPY
Tempo Competitors
Chevrolet Cavalier
Chevrolet Corsica
Chevrolet Lumina
Taurus Competitors
Honda Accord
Toyota Camry
Chevrolet Lumina
Dodge Intrepid
Chrysler Concorde
Eagle Vision
The 3.8 was a complete turd,headgasket problems which took the bottom end out of them
Thunderbird Super Coupe Competitors
Acura Legend
Nissan 300ZX
Taurus SHO Competitors
Nissan Maxima
Acura Legend
Chevrolet Lumina Z34
I thought the ford lineup was great...I was stuck with a dodge...
I had forgotten how awful that early 90s Lumina was ... yikes!
Mustang Competitors
Chevrolet Camaro
Pontiac Firebird
Pontiac Trans Am
you could say that.......haha
the probe is UGLY! Loved the first gen
Thunderbird Competitors
Pontiac Grand Prix
Chevrolet Lumina
Crown Victoria Competitors
Chevrolet Caprice
Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight
Buick Park Avenue
Buick Roadmaster
Probe Competitors
Plymouth Laser
Mitsubishi Eclipse
Eagle Talon
Toyota Celica
Nissan 240SX
Saturn SC
Festiva Competitors
Geo Metro
Toyota Tercel
Hyundai Excel
Escort Competitors
Honda Civic
Toyota Corolla
Toyota Tercel
Nissan Sentra
Chevrolet Cavalier
Saturn SC
Saturn SL1
Saturn SL2
I mean technically it did. But honestly it really didn't..........