As well as the opposite. Either way you’re either going to get a judge who favors the president or will go against him. You won’t ever get a totally neutral judge to rule on a case without some prejudice either for or against. So what’s fair? Maybe two judges one democrat. One Republican.
Judges are all reading the exact same federal laws and are supposed to be non-biased. The fact that judge shopping is a tactic shows how broken are court system has become.
Don't ask dad. Go to mom and tell her dad already said it's OK. They won't figure out what happened to after you're gone. And while you're out doing it, mom and dad are at home fighting with each other "how did you let this happen" fight.
The main problem is people do this(such as AGs) to get the ruling to reach a circuit court and change laws for all states. At least, until the supreme court rules on it.
The Supreme court Shouldn't let the company Purdue PHARMA own by the Sackler family don't get away from breaking the LAWS and make them too pay the victims because they are responsible for the victims who the victims were going to sue before the Sackler family filed Bankruptcy protection when they as Purdue PHARMA broke the LAWS in the UNITED states of America.
So basically they can still judge shop cuz they can still get the judge they want. Now its just about timing for when all other judges are a lil more busy than the judge they want
Don't worry, Fani Willis got this. She is a smart & honest poc just like Letitia James. And like E. Jean Carroll, she watched every episode of Law & Order too so she know a lot about that long wordy law document, you know the thing!
No judge should be allowed to rule on a case in which involves the President that appointed the Judge.
As well as the opposite. Either way you’re either going to get a judge who favors the president or will go against him. You won’t ever get a totally neutral judge to rule on a case without some prejudice either for or against. So what’s fair? Maybe two judges one democrat. One Republican.
isn't it more. likely that a judge appointed by a republican will be bias toward a republican president on trial?
Trump shouldn't be able to go in front of any judge that he appointed.
Absolutely! That would be ridiculous conflict of interest, with the judge owing his job to the defendant
Corporations and republicans will hate this.
And the Right. They do a lot of judge shopping too.
Yes!!!
Republicans are already crying about it.
they should sue to get this ban removed
Trump has learned well from his first lawyer, Roy Cohn, who famously said, "Don't tell me what the law is, tell me who the judge is."
That sounds like an awesome change 👍
Now we need to set judicial guidelines for frivolous motions and appeals by rich people who can run the courts.
GREAT NEWS! It’s about time! This practice has been grossly abused especially in Texas.
Judges are all reading the exact same federal laws and are supposed to be non-biased. The fact that judge shopping is a tactic shows how broken are court system has become.
A little too late we should’ve had this in😢same place a long time ago.😅
Until the courts became so politicized, there was no need for this law.
Sounds like a rich person problem 😢
You need to do a little research on how this practice affects everyone. Is it a rich person problem to lose access to an abortion pill?
Trump is running out of loop holes to slither through.
Excellent news!
Don't ask dad. Go to mom and tell her dad already said it's OK. They won't figure out what happened to after you're gone. And while you're out doing it, mom and dad are at home fighting with each other "how did you let this happen" fight.
We've had this in our country for a long time. They call it forum shopping here.
How was this ever legal....
Why this wasnt already in place is stupid.
The main problem is people do this(such as AGs) to get the ruling to reach a circuit court and change laws for all states. At least, until the supreme court rules on it.
Taking a shot in the dark here, but isn't it at least AS important to prevent stacking the Supreme Court?🙄
The Supreme court Shouldn't let the company Purdue PHARMA own by the Sackler family don't get away from breaking the LAWS and make them too pay the victims because they are responsible for the victims who the victims were going to sue before the Sackler family filed Bankruptcy protection when they as Purdue PHARMA broke the LAWS in the UNITED states of America.
Patent attorneys shop patent examiners. They have ratings on allowance rates for patent examiners
Not only judges shopping, they are buying them as well!
So basically they can still judge shop cuz they can still get the judge they want. Now its just about timing for when all other judges are a lil more busy than the judge they want
Jury shopping?
lol making lawyers cry
Oh yeah, that 'll work on the Orange Shitgibbon 😑👌
it's a club and you aint in it, they got them by the wallets
You're talking about one state, and one judge, Matthew J. Kacsmaryk.
New rules until it involves a Democrat. They're really good at skirting the rules and making up their own as they go along.😂
So the democrats, judge shopping for Trump's cases wasn't correct? We need different judges?
Judge shopping is something lawyers do Judges aren't included in this ruling.
Yeah refile those charges against TRUMP this time with a different judge
Trump shouldn't be able to go in front of any judge that he appointed.
Don't worry, Fani Willis got this. She is a smart & honest poc just like Letitia James. And like E. Jean Carroll, she watched every episode of Law & Order too so she know a lot about that long wordy law document, you know the thing!
And don't forget those classic episodes of Perry Mason and Matlock. Very educational 😆🤣😂
@@HoLeeFoc Don’t know who they are nor do I care
Stinks of BS
So obvious democrat leaning report. That’s what’s wrong with media. Whatever happened to neutral news reporting.