The real issue here is Maurice and some memebers of the crew appreciate Fabi /Hikaru or someone else way too much and give Magnus less credit than he deserves . Maurice when Hikaru/Fabi wins a lost position says they are the tricky they are monsters they know how to swindle and come on top .When Magnus wins a lost position he got lucky or his opponent got nervous there. That is what annoys him the most.
Maurice started the interview by saying something along the lines of "Magnus is the king of the blitz tournament today, not that that means anything." Because they were playing a different portion of the tournament now. But you could see Magnus's eye twitch, because it sounded a bit like Maurice was saying Magnus's win or blitz ability had no meaning in general. So the second questionable comment by Maurice set him off, and is probably why Magnus admonished him for "belittling the whole thing."
Why people are saying that Magnus is disrespectful? It's not like he did strike back with a personal attack, he just said that the impression he got from the question was belittling
It is literally called for. It’s his job. He gets paid to make entertainment over-the-top hyperbole comments like those. You clearly don’t know what “berating” means. It’s definitely not this, chief. It happens all the time in all sports. Watch Stephen A Smith.
@@consistentinconsistency3867 Stephen A Smith is a disgrace to sports entertainment, and it makes sense that people from other countries/sports will not want to have similar characters in the sports they like.
@@bobobububu Sports personalities like Stephen A. exist in ALL countries and all sports. Do your research. I'm sure you haven't heard of Gary Neville. Exaggeration has always been a part of sports analysis/entertainment.
What people dont realize is this is just one of several interviews with Maurice and he has always tried to sensationalize the game. Also he himself isnt on par with any of the people he interviews
@@spatrk6634 yes it is, he's saying that since Maurice is not at the same level magnus is at, he can not comment on the smoothness or lack thereof of Magnus's games
He's funny, charismatic, articulate, and doesn't mince his words. His commentary and interviewing are much better, imo, than the bland, boring, sycophantic style that a good many of the commenters here seem to prefer.
maurice is just so envious of these better than him players.. He goes how can nepo make a bad move in a championship match something he has never had even the slightest glimpse of.. Maurice is rated at 2440 so nepo is above 300 elo points and an amazing player in the top 5 constantly while maurice isnt in the top 1000 .. i cant watch this bull this hymn of mediocrity.. He belittles a man so much more worthy
You sound like a bitter fool. His job is a chess commentator at the moment. He has to ask these questions and begin a discourse surrounding the match and the players you idiot. He likely didn't even write the questions. And you sit here and say he's jealous! Ahahah you sound like the one who is jealous! Writing a TH-cam comment he will never see, he doesn't know you exist and he never will. He is far superior to you in terms of intellect and life prospects. Just shut up you are embarrassing yourself 😂😂
@Ian Novak what you are saying is pure nonsense .. Maurice would be laughable .. and if that was nepos bad game imagine maurices bad game.. one game means nothing .. let nepo and maurice have 10 games in a row.. the score would be 9-1
@@GIBTBCreations political.correctness and intellectual inadequacy are more than suspect in your comment.. my comment is directed to maurice s actions and words ..i dont know the man i dont have an opinion or objection other than what i saw in the videos which shows clearly a man with various complexes .. as i am afraid are you .. As for an aristotelian understanding of a logical proceedure well..you dont understand even the concept.. Racial? You mean i dont like he is black?? You derived that how exactly..you are certainly an idiot plain and simple..
Imagine getting trolled by Magnus. I mean Maurice is way better chess player than Magnus so of course he has the right to say the game wasn't so smooth. It's no big deal to be honest.
All their attitudes are a little on the too proud side. But that’s probably a common trait among top level chess players. And I am here for it. All the GOATS of chess were petty at times except Anand and I think that comes with being a super genius.
@@JJWAD Ramirez can be a pedo and S/A perpetrator AND be good at commentary. The two aren't linked. So this person's comment doesn't need to be edited...grow up.
@@The_Shrike actually his comments are very normal and it seems like Magnus and other people are too sensitive and taking them too close to the heart. He’s just a commentator and his job is to make it entertaining
@@consistentinconsistency3867 then he isn’t doing his job properly because after closer examination his comments are way too strong and it’s understandable why people don’t like that
They're giving Maurice a hard time, guess why? Maurice's job is to cover the event, and ask questions. Hang in there Maurice, you'll encounter GMs who aren't bigots and arrogant.
I never knew Levon was so cool
The real issue here is Maurice and some memebers of the crew appreciate Fabi /Hikaru or someone else way too much and give Magnus less credit than he deserves . Maurice when Hikaru/Fabi wins a lost position says they are the tricky they are monsters they know how to swindle and come on top .When Magnus wins a lost position he got lucky or his opponent got nervous there. That is what annoys him the most.
th-cam.com/video/mAC9JY_VjM8/w-d-xo.html incredible sacrifices
That's so BS lmao, magnus is clearly in the wrong here, yall would flame naka if he did the same "i literally don't care" lmao.
@@SavantGardeEX how is magnus in the wrong?
The entire chess 24 crew lick Magnus’s balls for breakfast every morning…..what the f** are you talking about?
Understandable. There are very subtle ways in which one human can verbally annoy another.
Levon really said "git gud, punk"💀💀💀
Magnus got so irritated 😂😂
Maurice started the interview by saying something along the lines of "Magnus is the king of the blitz tournament today, not that that means anything." Because they were playing a different portion of the tournament now. But you could see Magnus's eye twitch, because it sounded a bit like Maurice was saying Magnus's win or blitz ability had no meaning in general. So the second questionable comment by Maurice set him off, and is probably why Magnus admonished him for "belittling the whole thing."
Magnus here with the glasses reminds me of Tom Ripley
maurice tries to sensationalise but to be honest it doesn't look cool ..He deserves it
Why people are saying that Magnus is disrespectful? It's not like he did strike back with a personal attack, he just said that the impression he got from the question was belittling
Who knew chess nerds could be so entertaining lol
that interview after ian blundered was hilarious
that berating on ian is so uncalled for. disgusting.
It is literally called for. It’s his job. He gets paid to make entertainment over-the-top hyperbole comments like those.
You clearly don’t know what “berating” means. It’s definitely not this, chief. It happens all the time in all sports. Watch Stephen A Smith.
@@consistentinconsistency3867 this is the everybody gets a trophy side of TH-cam lol
th-cam.com/video/mAC9JY_VjM8/w-d-xo.html incredible sacrifices
@@consistentinconsistency3867 Stephen A Smith is a disgrace to sports entertainment, and it makes sense that people from other countries/sports will not want to have similar characters in the sports they like.
@@bobobububu Sports personalities like Stephen A. exist in ALL countries and all sports. Do your research. I'm sure you haven't heard of Gary Neville.
Exaggeration has always been a part of sports analysis/entertainment.
Aronian by murder
What?
@@mikaelarutyunov9578 huh?
Levon is hilariuous
What people dont realize is this is just one of several interviews with Maurice and he has always tried to sensationalize the game. Also he himself isnt on par with any of the people he interviews
Let's see this guy play a championship match against magnus and see how many times he blunders. Let's see how "smooth" his games are...
logical fallacy ad hominem
So you can't even say his games weren't smooth? You're not implying that you have to say nothing but good things about him because he's the WC?
@@GIBTBCreations its not ad hominem.
@@spatrk6634 yes it is, he's saying that since Maurice is not at the same level magnus is at, he can not comment on the smoothness or lack thereof of Magnus's games
@@GIBTBCreations that is not ad hominem. That is an insult
He's funny, charismatic, articulate, and doesn't mince his words. His commentary and interviewing are much better, imo, than the bland, boring, sycophantic style that a good many of the commenters here seem to prefer.
maurice is just so envious of these better than him players.. He goes how can nepo make a bad move in a championship match something he has never had even the slightest glimpse of.. Maurice is rated at 2440 so nepo is above 300 elo points and an amazing player in the top 5 constantly while maurice isnt in the top 1000 .. i cant watch this bull this hymn of mediocrity.. He belittles a man so much more worthy
You sound like a bitter fool. His job is a chess commentator at the moment. He has to ask these questions and begin a discourse surrounding the match and the players you idiot. He likely didn't even write the questions. And you sit here and say he's jealous! Ahahah you sound like the one who is jealous! Writing a TH-cam comment he will never see, he doesn't know you exist and he never will. He is far superior to you in terms of intellect and life prospects. Just shut up you are embarrassing yourself 😂😂
@Ian Novak what you are saying is pure nonsense .. Maurice would be laughable .. and if that was nepos bad game imagine maurices bad game.. one game means nothing .. let nepo and maurice have 10 games in a row.. the score would be 9-1
logical fallacy ad hominem, plus this comment is racially motivated
@@GIBTBCreations political.correctness and intellectual inadequacy are more than suspect in your comment.. my comment is directed to maurice s actions and words ..i dont know the man i dont have an opinion or objection other than what i saw in the videos which shows clearly a man with various complexes .. as i am afraid are you ..
As for an aristotelian understanding of a logical proceedure well..you dont understand even the concept..
Racial? You mean i dont like he is black?? You derived that how exactly..you are certainly an idiot plain and simple..
@@GIBTBCreations Hegel pfp "logical fallacy ad hominem" *Fortnite Dialectics* that is enough youtube comment section for me to handle today
Imagine getting trolled by Magnus. I mean Maurice is way better chess player than Magnus so of course he has the right to say the game wasn't so smooth. It's no big deal to be honest.
I know this is an old comment but and I'm sure you're joking. But that one wasn't it chief
@@solitudehero I think he meant overall career Maurice had played at a higher level before retiring.
Wtf haha you all remembered Magnus was the WC and Maurice didn’t even make to top 10
Magnus needs to learn to play good chess.
th-cam.com/video/mAC9JY_VjM8/w-d-xo.html incredible sacrifices
Hikas "attitude" gives a lot of haters, but magnus attitude is also terrible.
whats bad chess? being world champion?
All their attitudes are a little on the too proud side. But that’s probably a common trait among top level chess players. And I am here for it. All the GOATS of chess were petty at times except Anand and I think that comes with being a super genius.
Maurice is the man, he wasnt being disrespectful. Just straight to the point and tells it like it is. He wasnt being trolled at any point in this.
Levon was definitely trolling lol
Maurice is a garbage commentator
Levon 🤣🤣🤣
Classic Maurice. Biased. Rude. Disrespectful. Shameless.
Maurice Ashley is just rude and not even funny. No comparison to other fantastic commentators like Peter Svidler, Peter Leko or Alejandro Ramirez.
This comment aged well😂
yeah dude you might want to edit this comment....lmao
@@JJWAD Ramirez can be a pedo and S/A perpetrator AND be good at commentary. The two aren't linked. So this person's comment doesn't need to be edited...grow up.
you guys are too sensitive! this is a joke.
Maurice is awesome
VL straight gangsta
If chess fans/players remain this sensitive then the sport won’t grow to its fullest potential.
Magnus acted like a kid here
Great funny guy!
He is so unlikeable
You’re actually absolutely right, I never read between the lines of his comments
@@The_Shrike actually his comments are very normal and it seems like Magnus and other people are too sensitive and taking them too close to the heart. He’s just a commentator and his job is to make it entertaining
@@consistentinconsistency3867 then he isn’t doing his job properly because after closer examination his comments are way too strong and it’s understandable why people don’t like that
@@The_Shrike the opposite is true for me, I feel like his comments and questions are very boring and not very insightful
@@The_Shrike I would like to know how you examine so closely🤣
They're giving Maurice a hard time, guess why? Maurice's job is to cover the event, and ask questions. Hang in there Maurice, you'll encounter GMs who aren't bigots and arrogant.
:)
First
I have long thought Magnus, perhaps the most gifted chess player in history, is an absolute jerk.
Magnus responded appropriately to Maurice's bs