Murray Walker used to make the races so much for fun and interesting. Besides his knowledge, his comments and reactions were entertaining, and he was good at building up excitement in the race.
Bom dia !!!! Meu DEUS, quanta saudade. Parece que foi ontem...... Época maravilhosa. Muito obrigado pelo vídeo e parabéns pelo canal. Abraço do Brasil.......
3:08 ... 'Martin Brundle...in the Benetton'. I almost expected Murray to say 'Martin Brundle.. is down in the pits with...' force of habit from watching modern F1 😂
@@kevinprior3549- very much so. He proved that he could shine in good equipment, and was always a match for Schumacher on race day (from San Marino onwards). He was however, often a second a lap slower than Schumacher in qualifying - Brundle was never a good qualifier. However, Briatore ditched him in favour of Patrese, as Patrese understood active suspension, and being an Italian helped as well, as it was to a large extent, an Italian team.
Ayrton was actually pretty restrained in this interview, saying what he felt happened but not verbally attacking Schumacher. Seemingly he was less restrained a short time later when he spoke to him!
Senna should have been restrained, he had done exactly the same to Prost in 1989 that Schumacher did to Senna here yet Senna fanboys try to blame Prost for that one.
@@barrierodliffe4155 it was desperate, although that's all he could do to win the title, to be honest. Prost turned in, but he was always going to do so, so I never blamed him either.
@@andetom8980 Less consistent, more tempermental and caused in-team disputes far more than Michael, Ayrton was amazing but less complete, Michael had his downfalls too though
*3 to 7 F1 Championships, I Rest my case. Senna was typical 'Latin Blood,' Tempestuous, Impatient, frenetic at times, and somewhat 'Dangerous' in that he believed in 'The Hand of God' would save him. Watched many of his races in the late 80's & 90's and sorry to say not a fan of his style. Particularly the 1990 Japanese GP where Senna calculated and deliberately took Prost out to secure the Championship that Year. Not the way to Win* en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990_Japanese_Grand_Prix
@@GrrMeister Typical Senna hater to the point of racism. Seven championships notwithstanding, Michael Schumacher pales in comparison to other great champions like Niki Lauda, Jackie Stewart, Emerson Fittipaldi, Alain Prost, and Ayrton Senna!! Dodgy driving, illegal launch control, illegal traction control, and more. Google what Johnny Herbert and Jos Verstappen had to say about being his teammate at Benetton. Read what Senna and others said in 1994 just before tragedy struck in Imola.
@@chrisclermont456 *I am certainly not **_'racist'_** or particularly a fan of Schumacher who happened to be in the best car at the time. But suggest you catch up on some videos featuring Senna to see what I mean.*
Senna is dead on circuit, when it was popular. This particularity make him a legend. But, if it was living today, the world say : a great pilot. Nothing more. Lauda are better. Prost are globaly better. Schumacher was globaly better. Senna was one of the most dangerous racer of all time.
@@barrierodliffe4155 Completely different. I'm not a Senna fanboy. In Suzuka Senna had more than half a car going into the corner and never breaked after the pattern. Here in Magny Cours Schumacher completely misjudged the corner and ran into the middle of Senna's car. In 89, Prost saw Senna and changed abruptely his line to hit Senna. In 92 Senna simply didn't see the Benetton. Prost cheated, exactly like Schumacher did in 94 and 97. Senna was on his normal line. Senna was on fault in Hungary 90' against Nannini (go and see), and did on purpose against Prost in Suzuka 90', but not here.
@@qinq2020 Senna fanboys always say they are not fanboys then go on to prove they are. In 1989 Prost turned for the chicane and Senna was not half way alongside, Senna came from too far back too fast for the corner and never tried to avoid the collision. Prost had to turn or go off the track. Senna tried to overtake Nannini in Hungary and took Nannini out of the race much as he had tried to do to Prost in 1989. Prost never cheated to win anything unlike Senna who did quite a lot.
Barrie Rodliffe Dude, are you pretending you’re blind? Go and watch the replay from the helicopter’s perspective... You can see that Prost turns into the corner much earlier than previous times, just imagine the trajectory from his turning in, he would never make it to the apex of the corner that way.
Senna once deliberately destroyed his McLaren during the final moments of qualifying at the French GP by launching his car through the final 90° turn and crossing the line (which was located only a few metres along the straight) much faster than the speed needed to maintain grip. In fact, if memory serves from watching it live, by the time he slammed into the wall sideways, he was fully out of control and slightly airborne from the kerb contact. It's very surprising that this clip is not displayed or remembered as part of his incredible legacy. That was the Golden Age. Such was the dedication from teams and drivers, that the engine, gearbox, suspension and even the whole car could be sacrificed on a Friday and Saturday for the slightest advantage on a Sunday. They were the intoxicating days of raw competition that delivered true Champions, tested real men, and attracted real fans.
@@misobozic2634 While I agree they both did some things that were not so good and Senna had the most dangerous and deliberate crash ever in F 1 in 1990, I think your comment is a bit harsh.
The Commission Yeah, you're right. In 1988 it was obvious from very early on that a McLaren driver would be World Champion and that most likely the driver with the most wins would take the title which turned out to be the case, with Senna taking the title in Japan with eight wins to Prost's six. Prost made two mistakes in 1988 firstly underestimating Senna and secondly not driving to the rules. As for 1990 what happened at Suzuka was a result of what happened in 1989 and also what had gone on during the race weekend.
Prost won 7 races in 1988 and his only mistake was to perseude McLaren to take Senna instead of Piquet. As for 1990, it had nothing to do with 1989 when Prost won by being 21 points ahead of Senna and in 1990 Senna deliberately took Prost out of the race because he did not think he could beat Prost on the track.
Well, until 1990 the rules were best 11 results out of 16 races. The rules were same for all. The best driver with most wins was supposed to be Champion, not the one in the most reliable car. So Senna was legit Champion 1988, period. 1991 it got changed to 16 results but the winner got 10 instead 9 points. Senna won either way.
i quote Senna here, "In Racing, if you see a gap you take it. If you don't then you are not Racing"... He said this when he hit Prost coming from behind. Only this time, Senna left almost the entire track width for Shumacher to take...
what he actually said was "if u no longer go for a gap that exists then u no longer a racing driver" and he said it at the jackie stewart interview not when u say he did..
@e.mc2 Yes. Prost obviously turned in. Coz it's his corner. Senna just arrowed in into the tiny gap "obviously" with more speed. (Hope you noticed) There was no way he could've made that turn successfully from that place on the track (inside line and close to the Kerbs) and at the speed he came in from behind. He just arrowed in to deny the corner to Prost. That's it. In this case, Senna drove to the corner like there was nobody else on the track with him or behind him. He went wide to the left side of the track before turning right for the corner... Which is a normal racing line when you are not defending anybody. But "obviously" he left enough room on his right for a faster vehicle to overtake him, which Schumacher did. Still Senna took the corner going straight over the kerbs. But with another car at your rightside, that's a wrong line. He should've been sportive by leaving enough gap between himself and the kerb. "Obviously" he would've had a faster exit out of the corner than the car at the inside. If he says he didn't see him coming, then it's not Schumacher fault. If he had seen him coming and still drove that line means it's unsportive.
@@Infiniteperception what year are u talkin about with prost? 89 in a maclaren or 90 in a ferrari? Both append at suzuka and when they were both in a maclren in 89 senna HAD TO WIN and also win in adelaide to...so where do u get he only needed 2nd from? Are u talkin 1990? Prost was in a ferrari then and senna openly admits he did it on purpose to avenge 89,when he crashed with prost,re'started,won but was disqualified by balestre,handing the championship to prost...it appears your talkn about 89 to me..your Wrong thou about only needin 2nd..he had to win the last 2 grand prix,s ..in 90 the roles were reversed and they both crashed at the very 1st corner ,senna was also vexed in suzuka 90 as he was on pole but balestre switched the grid standins so pole was on the dirty asphalt side,thats how prost managed to jump into the lead..
@e.mc2 u think or u thought? either way you,re wrong..do u honestly think that somebody only needing 2nd would make an inside maneovre like that? There was 9 laps left and he had to win..after senna.s disqualification nannini was awarded 1st place and prost declared 89 WDC champ.. prost didnt race again in a maclaren and joined ferrari for the 90 season
Ma che, sei scemo? Schumi, come molte altre volte, aveva torto marcio. Ricordati la gara in cui ha provato a buttare fuori Jaques Villeneuve, uscendo lui, il quale ha fatto tutta la gara con la ruota stampata sulla fiancata !!!
Senna's car naturally is 'ultra wide'. But Schumacher certainly had the inside line and if Schumacher was to brake and let Senna through he would have crashed anyways, while if Senna had not turned in deeply, he would have lost the place, yet Lived to fight... According to Senna's own statement.. Schumacher too is only 'going for the gap that exists'
Stupid argument... Senna was in front, his corner! If they were side by side you would be right! "Going for the gap that exists" is Senna talking about the accident in Suzuka in 1990 with Prost which he later admitted to Jackie Stewart that was his fault... You can check that in a Jackie Stewart interview!
@@aerrhh - yeah i sure do know the Incident... And Sir Jackie Stewart 's interview too..I am a hard core Schumacher and Senna Fan, but All i was saying was that, that incident could have been avoided.... As for Senna, it was not just the Japanese Grand Prix, that incident happened, which was why at the first place, Jackie Stewart infact had to ask that infamous question of Senna being involved in more crashes than anybody...
If I knew I would appreciate these sounds back then so much more. These are racing cars, not the silent computer chips they drive around these days /-:
It's funny people blaming Schumacher for this accident, but when Hill tried to cut in and Schumacher did the same turn for that championship race, it was all Schumachers fault.
@@margaridagarida260 , Shumacher era um grande piloto, seria sim um duelo fantástico a pessoa que não reconhecer as quantidades de um Schumacher como piloto não conhece F1
@@edescastro2066 piloto maquete da FIA!; sujo; que dependeu dos outros pra vencer!;barriquelo que sabe!;trapasseiro; mentiroso,teve pilotos melhores antes dele e depois dele também!;NUNCA SERA CONSIDERADO COMO BOM PILOTO!; JAMAIS!;SEMPRE FOI E SEMPRE SERA SENNA,HOJE É SEMPRE!, NAO E RECONHECER QUANTIDADE SE TITULOS; E SIM TALENTO; MUITO TALENTO!!!!!!!!; O MUNDO PERDEU SENNA X PROST!;SENNA X MANSELL; SENNA X ALESI; DENTRE OUTROSMMMM..
@@margaridagarida260 tbem acho o Airton o melhor piloto de todos os tempos, historicamente Airton já havia superado a geração passada ,Prost , Mansell , Alesi , Nelson , Rosberg ,lauda , Shumacher tinha o mesmo DNA de sena a 10 anos atrás... numa época em que a F1 dependia muito mais do talento dos pilotos do que dos carros,o mundo perdeu o encontro de dois gênio do automobilismo com capacidades iguais de disputa.vê o vídeo do melhor adversários que ele mesmo disse na época do kart na Inglaterra,vc vai ver que o temperamento do Sena não era tão romântico como vc diz , Airton devolveu a batida no Prost se lembra! Jogou o carro em cima dele ,sempre exigiu previlegios de primeira piloto ,como todos fazem .mas concordamos numa coisa ,ele era o melhor, tem dias que lembro daqueles dias ,das madrugadas ,da felicidade de comemorar as vitórias , não tem um domingo que não me lembro dele.
@@ricardagottschalk9089, what a deeply unintelligent response. Senna, by percentage, had considerably more unforced errors than Hamilton or Schumacher. If he hadn't, his name might be higher in the record books. Speed is nothing without consistency.
Both braked later than Berger ahead. Michael had already decided to try to overtake, but couldn´t know Senna also would get very close to his teammate ahead. Not sure if the McLarens would had touched half a second later.
Senna for sure knew schumi was there but schumi was so far back that senna probably thought he could just turn in and hoped schumacher would yield. Schumi on the other hand probably thought he could bully senna to yield by making the move anyway. It is pretty similar thing has with brundle and schumacher in brands hatch in f3 race. The overtaking driver hopes to make the pass by forcing the other driver to avoid the accident. Senna and schumacher have been on both sides of this before. Schumi was pretty stupid to assume senna would ever yield. link to brundle/senna: th-cam.com/video/frPPrEz4RYQ/w-d-xo.html
@@erwinlommer197 Sounds very much like Suzuka 1989 when Prost turned in and Senna crashed into him, then it was Senna's fault, this time Schumacher's fault.
I disagree - it’s modern and user-friendly, but it’s not a driver’s circuit. Too few opportunities for overtaking, and although there are some challenging corners (Estoril and the Imola chicane), it didn’t really facilitate close, or high g-force racing.
The same happened in Adelaide, later that year, where Ayrton crashed into race leader Mansell. Of course, it wasn't intentional, every driver can make a mistake. Here, in France, Senna was the victim.
Mansell had nothing to do with it. Senna put him out of the race and the British was angry about that. He was leading, when AS crashed into him. Just like in 1993 at Monza, when Senna did the same to Brundle.
Mansell brake tested Senna in Adelaide 1992. His own countryman Stirling Moss even stated that had he (Mansell) done it to him he would have taken his head off.
Brake tested ? Senna completely ruined Mansell's race, robbing him off a potential victory. No question that Senna was to blame, Nigel was (rightfully) very angry with him. It was Mansell's last race in F1 (before switching to IndyCar), and he wanted to produce something special, crowning his entire F1 career with a win in his last GP. It could be his 10th triumph in one season, what was a record at the time.
Was Mansell rightfully angry with Senna in Canada 1992? because he was and it was totally Mansell's fault. Mansell wanted to strangle Senna at Spa 87 and guess that was Mansell's fault again. Mansell brake tested Senna at the 1992 Australian race and as usual whinged that he was the innocent party again.
lord such I think you will find that Senna and Brundle were contesting the British F3 Championship in 1983 ... so perhaps you mean Monza 1993? As for Senna Schumacher comparisons, I think they both had the widest cars and smallest mirrors in F1 history.
@@bZLxcz Bozo, try learning how to read. I never said the collision in 1992 was Senna's fault. I replied to the comment that today Schumacher would get a 10 place grid penalty for less. I agree since the collision was Schumacher's fault and unlike Senna he admitted it straight away. Again just for you. Senna got away with far worse. I trust you understand.
@@bZLxcz Bozo, you can think what you like and tell as many lies as you like. I hardly look at Senna videos but Senna was in some Prost or Schumacher videos. Take notice of the title of the video. This video is interesting because it shows Schumacher trying to do the same thing Senna did in 1989 when Senna crashed into Prost. I support Senna in this case just as I support Prost in that case, at least I am consistent unlike Senna fanboys.
But you have to give another car enough space if it's on your inside. I mean Schumacher couldn't simply disappear from the position he was in or could he? From what Senna said in the interview in the video it appears to me as he didn't looked in his mirror and he had no idea that Schumacher was so close. Yes Schumacher was probably a bit to late on the bakes but you should also use your mirrors if cars are everywhere around you.
No, Suzuka 1989, when he barged into Prost in the chicane (both were driving fo McLaren at that time), overestimating his abilities and the distance. Then, of course, he did the same in 1990 before the first corner, but at least he didn't accuse Prost.
Are you joking or what? Suzuka 89 is a totally different situation. Senna and Prost were almost side by side when the french intentionally turned earlier for the corner, hitting the brazilian in the chicane and so avoiding that Senna overtakes him and took de lead. In 92 French GP, Schumacher hit Senna's rear tire. He wasn't even close to overtake Senna. In Suzuka 1990, Senna hit Prost clearly on purpous, as a vengeance for being disqualified in Suzuka 89 by Prost's godfather, Mr Jean Marie Balestre, whom put the title on the french's lap by making that dirty decision.
Senna was behind Prost in 1989 when Prost started to turn and senna's front wheel hit the side of Prost's car, Senna was not almost side by side, his front wing was only just in front of Prost's rear wheel when Senna drove into Prost..
@@kallo182 Senna didn't crash out anyone other than Prost in 1990. Schumacher famously turned into Damon Hill, Jacques Villeneuve, and several others in his career.
@@chrisclermont456 94 his car was a tripod and hill impatient.def Not bis fault. watch the replay. 97 was a dumb mistake, should have let villeneuve Go to the gravel. got what he deserved for it though
the thought of little Senna picking a fist fight with the uber fit schumi.... Thank God he went on to win 7 wdcs instead of 7 years for hitting a child
Perci Borges De Almeida Logo mais a frente. Senna chutou ele dá pista. Aí é largada e tal. Mta confusão. Mano a mano. Ele conheceu a famosa porta fechada do Senna hahaha
Anyone else who turns into another car like that is considered a dangerous driver, but since it was Senna... the blame is put on the driver of the car Senna turned into. Young Michael saw the opening; and took it. Senna should have known that turning into a car, while entering a corner under heavy braking, would result in at least one car being taken out of the race.
@@barrierodliffe4155 theres no point lad. The fact of the matter is senns's fans whitwash over all his flaws and try to blame the other drivers for his mistakes. Him just like Schumacher made plenty of mistakes which they are no gods, just two of the best to ever do it. Personally i think the British f1 media are a disgrace and biased against schumi especially brundle who is an idiot
Just listen the engines which F1 cars had back then... I barely heard what Ayrton said in his interview... in my opinion F1 died in 2014, because of changes in regulations, and finally the main change - V6 hybrid era crap. Someone will say that current engines are faster, more effective etc. but for me V12 and V10 were one of the main reasons why I was interested in F1 until 2012....
Senna thought .....I 'm Senna , i can do whatever i want !!!! That was before !!! In racing everybody is equal ! Schumacher had to come and prove that !!! We have had enough of Senna's attitude !!!!
Senna was the man at that time and Schumacher was at fault here. Senna was no angel for sure but what are you talking about saying people had enough of Senna's attitude? Schumacher's attitude was worse, punting Damon Hill off to win a championship, tried to do the same to Villeneuve but thankfully got what he deserved and DNF himself, the fake mistake in Monaco qualy 2006.....the list goes on. Michael was a great driver but one of the dirtiest too.
@@endlessmotion2255you must look at the video with Damon Hill again. Why should he let him pass ??????? He defended his position ? It is what everybody else does ! Damon Hill pushed it !!!! It didnt work out !! And do you know why ? Because Schumo never tryied to win a race in a lap ! He studied his opponent and when he was sure that he can do it without hurting him or the car , he went for it ! Everybody else in racing , untill now , try to win in the first lap !!!! As far as Villeneuve , who is he ??????? A spoiled brat who came in f1 because he didnt know what else to do with his life ! He got what he deserved !!!!
I think you need to go back and watch the video again. Look how sharply and aggressively Michael turns into Damon. It's not the normal racing line he's taking as he's heading to jump right over the curb and cut the corner if Damon isn't there. He knew exactly what he was doing when faced with the prospect of losing the championship in that moment. The same happened again in 1997. It was a trait of Michael's unfortunately, as good of a driver as he was.
its too clear that he squeezed Michael in that corner on purpose, Michael has been on his side way before the corner entry point. you would be blind to see otherwise
Of course those of who know F1's history know that Senna admitted in 1991 that he took Prost out in 1990. As for 1989 that was six of one & half a dozen of the other.
Für mich war das Absicht, genau so hat er schon mal einen BMW abgeschossen.❗👎 😵 🥴 Schumacher war alles aber garantiert kein Sportsmann.❗👎 Den Namen Schummel Schummi hat er sich mehr als verdient.❗🤮
Senna always expected the others to be pussies and back out, as soon as he closes the door... And bullshit he did not see him. 😂 Senna was a great driver, but also a lil princess, when someone except him dared to have will to win a race.
Esto era Schumacher. Ver a tantos considerándolo el mejor y vos sabes, porque lo viste en tiempo real hacer este tipo de cagadas, que era un… voluble. Te perdonamos, Schumi, pero dejaste muchas páginas feas escritas con tinta indeleble.
@@acidocloridrico9168 Maybe you like to lie but you have only ever seen me telling the truth. The Shame is yours for being a liar. In this video I have said Senna was right and Schumacher wrong.
Just like it was Senna's fault in Suzuka 1989 when he wanted to overtake Prost before the chicane, Prost closed the door, Senna barged into him, effectively destroying his race and later was furious that he got disqulified for illegal pushing by stewards.
What the hell does Suzuka 1989 have to do with this accident, it was completely different. In Suzuka 89 Senna was alongside Prost, who turned into him (turned early in fact) to crash them out and win the title. Senna proved it was a perfectly good manoeuvre by doing exactly the same to Nannini later, who didn't want to crash into him. The race was meaningless for Prost, he was after the title. Senna was disqualified by Balestre for cutting the chicane, supposedly gaining an advantage from that. Apparently Balestre wanted Senna to turn the car around, drive in the opposite direction and rejoin.
Darren Walton I know. The cheek of Schumacher to have his car anywhere near Senna when the great man was turning to go round a corner. Senna is a dirty hypocrite.
Senna didn't have to give Schumacher any space because he was in front, Schumacher hit Senna's right rear tyre. Schumacher was starting his 14th F1 race, this accident shows his lack of F1 experience.
I was there. What a disappointment to see Senna being eliminated by a panzer. What will forever separate these two champions : arrogance, lack of humanity, benevolence, the result at all costs on one side. The plume,the class,the poetry of the other.
Blaaaah blaaaah blaaaah. ...to much judgement here.... Only the win counts...no matter how...so do what needs to be done and never feel guilty. ..that is what makes a champion. So normal racing incident here...NO ONE TO BLAME!!!!
@Retro Lover No traction control was ever found...about blistering starts you are talking... th-cam.com/video/BR6SgKEFLOk/w-d-xo.html does this look like blistering start?...as i said...bullshit.
2 legends and icons of F1,good old times...
Murray Walker used to make the races so much for fun and interesting. Besides his knowledge, his comments and reactions were entertaining, and he was good at building up excitement in the race.
*Great Team at the time - Murray & James*
True but you have to admit David croft does a good job of it too
@@gam0t0 he has the worst speaking voice I've ever heard and the dumbest catch phrase. Light's out and away we go hurrrr durrr
And now he's back with James 🙏
I never realized how much I missed some of these backmarker teams and drivers until I watched this video and saw the starting grid
Lets hope we don't need to miss Williams 😢
@@ebob4177 I do miss Williams (in winning form) it's so sad to see what once was a great team struggle to pass a car.
Bom dia !!!!
Meu DEUS, quanta saudade.
Parece que foi ontem......
Época maravilhosa.
Muito obrigado pelo vídeo e parabéns pelo canal.
Abraço do Brasil.......
RIP Ayrton Senna
3:08 ... 'Martin Brundle...in the Benetton'. I almost expected Murray to say 'Martin Brundle.. is down in the pits with...' force of habit from watching modern F1 😂
You re so pretty, hugs from brazil
@@Eversonjks you're a loser
1992 was Brundle's best year I think
@@kevinprior3549- very much so. He proved that he could shine in good equipment, and was always a match for Schumacher on race day (from San Marino onwards). He was however, often a second a lap slower than Schumacher in qualifying - Brundle was never a good qualifier.
However, Briatore ditched him in favour of Patrese, as Patrese understood active suspension, and being an Italian helped as well, as it was to a large extent, an Italian team.
Senna was greatest man in F1. Not just as driver, but overall person
Sure he was except for the cheating, lying and crashing into other drivers.
Ayrton was actually pretty restrained in this interview, saying what he felt happened but not verbally attacking Schumacher. Seemingly he was less restrained a short time later when he spoke to him!
Senna should have been restrained, he had done exactly the same to Prost in 1989 that Schumacher did to Senna here yet Senna fanboys try to blame Prost for that one.
Same sort of thing Senna done in his early days. It happens when you're in your first full season of f1.
@@weallfollowmanutd
Senna was still doing the same in 1989, his 5th season.
@@barrierodliffe4155 it was desperate, although that's all he could do to win the title, to be honest. Prost turned in, but he was always going to do so, so I never blamed him either.
@@weallfollowmanutd
I agree, the strange thing is Senna did not blame Prost but called it a racing incident.
Two legends.
You cannot possibly expect Schumacher to yield to Senna, or vice-versa?
Neither would yield. That's what made them what they are.
Sorry ,but senna is better than schumacher
@@andetom8980 Less consistent, more tempermental and caused in-team disputes far more than Michael, Ayrton was amazing but less complete, Michael had his downfalls too though
@@andetom8980 Schumacher is the best, nr.1
As great as they both were, he did kinda just drive into the back of senna, there wasn't some epic battle for the lead
@martin joseph hopefully one day you get what you deserve
Senna will forever the legend of F1, the best driver ever in F1 history.. RIP legend 😢
*3 to 7 F1 Championships, I Rest my case. Senna was typical 'Latin Blood,' Tempestuous, Impatient, frenetic at times, and somewhat 'Dangerous' in that he believed in 'The Hand of God' would save him. Watched many of his races in the late 80's & 90's and sorry to say not a fan of his style. Particularly the 1990 Japanese GP where Senna calculated and deliberately took Prost out to secure the Championship that Year. Not the way to Win*
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990_Japanese_Grand_Prix
@@GrrMeister Typical Senna hater to the point of racism. Seven championships notwithstanding, Michael Schumacher pales in comparison to other great champions like Niki Lauda, Jackie Stewart, Emerson Fittipaldi, Alain Prost, and Ayrton Senna!! Dodgy driving, illegal launch control, illegal traction control, and more. Google what Johnny Herbert and Jos Verstappen had to say about being his teammate at Benetton. Read what Senna and others said in 1994 just before tragedy struck in Imola.
@@chrisclermont456 *I am certainly not **_'racist'_** or particularly a fan of Schumacher who happened to be in the best car at the time. But suggest you catch up on some videos featuring Senna to see what I mean.*
Senna is dead on circuit, when it was popular. This particularity make him a legend. But, if it was living today, the world say : a great pilot. Nothing more. Lauda are better. Prost are globaly better. Schumacher was globaly better. Senna was one of the most dangerous racer of all time.
Senna had the racing line, Schumi was not close enough and had a lot of track, Schumis fault.
That sounds just like Suzuka 1989 when Senna crashed into Prost who had the racing line.
@@barrierodliffe4155 Senna fanboys have double standards
@@barrierodliffe4155 Completely different. I'm not a Senna fanboy. In Suzuka Senna had more than half a car going into the corner and never breaked after the pattern. Here in Magny Cours Schumacher completely misjudged the corner and ran into the middle of Senna's car. In 89, Prost saw Senna and changed abruptely his line to hit Senna. In 92 Senna simply didn't see the Benetton. Prost cheated, exactly like Schumacher did in 94 and 97. Senna was on his normal line.
Senna was on fault in Hungary 90' against Nannini (go and see), and did on purpose against Prost in Suzuka 90', but not here.
@@qinq2020
Senna fanboys always say they are not fanboys then go on to prove they are. In 1989 Prost turned for the chicane and Senna was not half way alongside, Senna came from too far back too fast for the corner and never tried to avoid the collision. Prost had to turn or go off the track.
Senna tried to overtake Nannini in Hungary and took Nannini out of the race much as he had tried to do to Prost in 1989. Prost never cheated to win anything unlike Senna who did quite a lot.
Barrie Rodliffe Dude, are you pretending you’re blind? Go and watch the replay from the helicopter’s perspective... You can see that Prost turns into the corner much earlier than previous times, just imagine the trajectory from his turning in, he would never make it to the apex of the corner that way.
3:14 early efforts for pit lane speed limiter
Ayrton Senna 👍👍👍🇧🇷
Senna once deliberately destroyed his McLaren during the final moments of qualifying at the French GP by launching his car through the final 90° turn and crossing the line (which was located only a few metres along the straight) much faster than the speed needed to maintain grip. In fact, if memory serves from watching it live, by the time he slammed into the wall sideways, he was fully out of control and slightly airborne from the kerb contact.
It's very surprising that this clip is not displayed or remembered as part of his incredible legacy.
That was the Golden Age. Such was the dedication from teams and drivers, that the engine, gearbox, suspension and even the whole car could be sacrificed on a Friday and Saturday for the slightest advantage on a Sunday. They were the intoxicating days of raw competition that delivered true Champions, tested real men, and attracted real fans.
You mean this? th-cam.com/video/HNV9Hzjw4lY/w-d-xo.html
He just nudged the wall. But anyway.
Senna number one
Fucking cheat
a legend and an up and coming legend.. 👍👌👍👌👍👌
two dirtiest f1 driver ever...
@@misobozic2634
While I agree they both did some things that were not so good and Senna had the most dangerous and deliberate crash ever in F 1 in 1990, I think your comment is a bit harsh.
And steering wheels were round. Now pilots get in with their own desktop keyboards lol.
To this day I cannot believe people are saying it’s Schumacher’s fault. Did you not see Ericsson come flying down the inside like a mad man?! 😁
Senna fez isso com vários pilotos!
Ma quando mai? Zitto, scemo!
SENNA G.O.A.T
Senna forever world champion 1988/1990/1991
+Carlos Rubio Senna drove better in both years and 89 for that matter.
Darren Walton 88 Prost outscored Senna, 90 used McLaren as weapon against Ferrari
The Commission Yeah, you're right. In 1988 it was obvious from very early on that a McLaren driver would be World Champion and that most likely the driver with the most wins would take the title which turned out to be the case, with Senna taking the title in Japan with eight wins to Prost's six. Prost made two mistakes in 1988 firstly underestimating Senna and secondly not driving to the rules. As for 1990 what happened at Suzuka was a result of what happened in 1989 and also what had gone on during the race weekend.
Prost won 7 races in 1988 and his only mistake was to perseude McLaren to take Senna instead of Piquet.
As for 1990, it had nothing to do with 1989 when Prost won by being 21 points ahead of Senna and in 1990 Senna deliberately took Prost out of the race because he did not think he could beat Prost on the track.
Well, until 1990 the rules were best 11 results out of 16 races. The rules were same for all. The best driver with most wins was supposed to be Champion, not the one in the most reliable car. So Senna was legit Champion 1988, period.
1991 it got changed to 16 results but the winner got 10 instead 9 points. Senna won either way.
i quote Senna here, "In Racing, if you see a gap you take it. If you don't then you are not Racing"... He said this when he hit Prost coming from behind. Only this time, Senna left almost the entire track width for Shumacher to take...
what he actually said was "if u no longer go for a gap that exists then u no longer a racing driver" and he said it at the jackie stewart interview not when u say he did..
@e.mc2 Yes. Prost obviously turned in. Coz it's his corner. Senna just arrowed in into the tiny gap "obviously" with more speed. (Hope you noticed) There was no way he could've made that turn successfully from that place on the track (inside line and close to the Kerbs) and at the speed he came in from behind. He just arrowed in to deny the corner to Prost. That's it. In this case, Senna drove to the corner like there was nobody else on the track with him or behind him. He went wide to the left side of the track before turning right for the corner... Which is a normal racing line when you are not defending anybody. But "obviously" he left enough room on his right for a faster vehicle to overtake him, which Schumacher did. Still Senna took the corner going straight over the kerbs. But with another car at your rightside, that's a wrong line. He should've been sportive by leaving enough gap between himself and the kerb. "Obviously" he would've had a faster exit out of the corner than the car at the inside. If he says he didn't see him coming, then it's not Schumacher fault. If he had seen him coming and still drove that line means it's unsportive.
@@saintlysinner3922 you are right... He said it. But it applies here to Schumacher.
@@Infiniteperception what year are u talkin about with prost? 89 in a maclaren or 90 in a ferrari? Both append at suzuka and when they were both in a maclren in 89 senna HAD TO WIN and also win in adelaide to...so where do u get he only needed 2nd from? Are u talkin 1990? Prost was in a ferrari then and senna openly admits he did it on purpose to avenge 89,when he crashed with prost,re'started,won but was disqualified by balestre,handing the championship to prost...it appears your talkn about 89 to me..your Wrong thou about only needin 2nd..he had to win the last 2 grand prix,s ..in 90 the roles were reversed and they both crashed at the very 1st corner ,senna was also vexed in suzuka 90 as he was on pole but balestre switched the grid standins so pole was on the dirty asphalt side,thats how prost managed to jump into the lead..
@e.mc2 u think or u thought? either way you,re wrong..do u honestly think that somebody only needing 2nd would make an inside maneovre like that? There was 9 laps left and he had to win..after senna.s disqualification nannini was awarded 1st place and prost declared 89 WDC champ.. prost didnt race again in a maclaren and joined ferrari for the 90 season
Senna: "you came like a torpedo"
Schumacher: "I only have two eyes"
Senna was a great driver, probably the best over any other driver but, this time Schumacher was with the reason.
Ma che, sei scemo? Schumi, come molte altre volte, aveva torto marcio. Ricordati la gara in cui ha provato a buttare fuori Jaques Villeneuve, uscendo lui, il quale ha fatto tutta la gara con la ruota stampata sulla fiancata !!!
Schumacher é o cara mas desleal que já ouve na f1...com toda certeza
Schumacher was going " for a gap which existed " ... don't cry , Ayrton
Senna's car naturally is 'ultra wide'. But Schumacher certainly had the inside line and if Schumacher was to brake and let Senna through he would have crashed anyways, while if Senna had not turned in deeply, he would have lost the place, yet Lived to fight... According to Senna's own statement.. Schumacher too is only 'going for the gap that exists'
Stupid argument... Senna was in front, his corner! If they were side by side you would be right! "Going for the gap that exists" is Senna talking about the accident in Suzuka in 1990 with Prost which he later admitted to Jackie Stewart that was his fault... You can check that in a Jackie Stewart interview!
@@aerrhh - yeah i sure do know the Incident... And Sir Jackie Stewart 's interview too..I am a hard core Schumacher and Senna Fan, but All i was saying was that, that incident could have been avoided.... As for Senna, it was not just the Japanese Grand Prix, that incident happened, which was why at the first place, Jackie Stewart infact had to ask that infamous question of Senna being involved in more crashes than anybody...
Adelaide hairpin, Melbourne hairpin, La Source corner, turn 3 hairpin at A-1 ring - sad how the new circuits have no personality!
Magny-Cours never had any personality.
It's just Schumacher being Schumacher. YT, stop suggesting this video to me every day...
McLaren in 92 and 93 was shit, worst than Williams and Benetton but Senna's drive was pure genius.
Simply the best, EVER.
Nope hes not even close to be best a legend Yes but Not best
In 93 it was much better than 92
@@irui3en364 he's more than a Legend.
If I knew I would appreciate these sounds back then so much more. These are racing cars, not the silent computer chips they drive around these days /-:
It's funny people blaming Schumacher for this accident, but when Hill tried to cut in and Schumacher did the same turn for that championship race, it was all Schumachers fault.
1:14 that camera shot is epic
Schumacher did such a big mistake and destroyed Senna's race
Schumacher momments never forgotten with Senna
Schumacher into Senna was like a warning for Hill & Villeneuve & Alonso that were coming up after this.
Schumacher was way too optimistic here, but surely Senna can't just ruthlessly close the door thinking "I'm Senna, so he will yield"...
Escuta o ronco dos motores.... isso era F1
Like senna said: if you dont go for a gap you no longer are racingdriver. And what senna did to prost is much worse than this accident
Actitud antideportiva del alemán.... senna un grande por siempre
❤️❤️Senna.
O mundo do esporte perdeu grandes duelos Sena x Shumacher
Seu nariz!;perdeu foi o Senna!; shumaquer foi tarde!;trapasseiro; arrogante; egoista;falso!
@@margaridagarida260 , Shumacher era um grande piloto, seria sim um duelo fantástico a pessoa que não reconhecer as quantidades de um Schumacher como piloto não conhece F1
@@edescastro2066 piloto maquete da FIA!; sujo; que dependeu dos outros pra vencer!;barriquelo que sabe!;trapasseiro; mentiroso,teve pilotos melhores antes dele e depois dele também!;NUNCA SERA CONSIDERADO COMO BOM PILOTO!; JAMAIS!;SEMPRE FOI E SEMPRE SERA SENNA,HOJE É SEMPRE!, NAO E RECONHECER QUANTIDADE SE TITULOS; E SIM TALENTO; MUITO TALENTO!!!!!!!!; O MUNDO PERDEU SENNA X PROST!;SENNA X MANSELL; SENNA X ALESI; DENTRE OUTROSMMMM..
@@margaridagarida260 tbem acho o Airton o melhor piloto de todos os tempos, historicamente Airton já havia superado a geração passada ,Prost , Mansell , Alesi , Nelson , Rosberg ,lauda , Shumacher tinha o mesmo DNA de sena a 10 anos atrás... numa época em que a F1 dependia muito mais do talento dos pilotos do que dos carros,o mundo perdeu o encontro de dois gênio do automobilismo com capacidades iguais de disputa.vê o vídeo do melhor adversários que ele mesmo disse na época do kart na Inglaterra,vc vai ver que o temperamento do Sena não era tão romântico como vc diz , Airton devolveu a batida no Prost se lembra! Jogou o carro em cima dele ,sempre exigiu previlegios de primeira piloto ,como todos fazem .mas concordamos numa coisa ,ele era o melhor, tem dias que lembro daqueles dias ,das madrugadas ,da felicidade de comemorar as vitórias , não tem um domingo que não me lembro dele.
@@edescastro2066 superou Piquet vc cagou pela boca
It's fun cause at 1:15 they say schumacher is challenging senna, then at 1:22 "it's schumacher and senna!"
Schumacher best ever...goat...
This is simple, Senna always has the line.
LOL. What a farce. Senna couldn't even manage his own line in Brazil in 94.
@@flyingphoenix113 What a stupid Comment🤣🤣🤣
@@ricardagottschalk9089, what a deeply unintelligent response. Senna, by percentage, had considerably more unforced errors than Hamilton or Schumacher. If he hadn't, his name might be higher in the record books. Speed is nothing without consistency.
@@flyingphoenix113 Ya right.
Haters gonna hate.🤣🤣🤣
@@flyingphoenix113 Senna had a mecanic direction problem in 94, he with his McLaren was so better than Williams, that car for him was a shit...
Senna was holding his line like there were no other car beside of him, so i dont think that this was only Schumachers fault...
Most Schumi fault
Both braked later than Berger ahead. Michael had already decided to try to overtake, but couldn´t know Senna also would get very close to his teammate ahead. Not sure if the McLarens would had touched half a second later.
The best two drivers ever. The rest are not even a shadow of them. Two legends impossible to be compared with
Prost better than either.
Ayrton Senna da Silva ó melhor piloto que a F1 já teve é terá !
Senna did, what he always did - leaving absolutely no place for the other driver
Schumacher literally didn't turn the wheel
Senna!!!😍😍😍
It seems like Senna didn’t notice Schumacher coming through on the inside and turned in on him, whether Senna did notice or not is another question...
Senna for sure knew schumi was there but schumi was so far back that senna probably thought he could just turn in and hoped schumacher would yield. Schumi on the other hand probably thought he could bully senna to yield by making the move anyway. It is pretty similar thing has with brundle and schumacher in brands hatch in f3 race. The overtaking driver hopes to make the pass by forcing the other driver to avoid the accident. Senna and schumacher have been on both sides of this before. Schumi was pretty stupid to assume senna would ever yield.
link to brundle/senna: th-cam.com/video/frPPrEz4RYQ/w-d-xo.html
@@erwinlommer197
Sounds very much like Suzuka 1989 when Prost turned in and Senna crashed into him, then it was Senna's fault, this time Schumacher's fault.
Such a cool track. Great corners
I was never a fan of Magny Cours.
I disagree - it’s modern and user-friendly, but it’s not a driver’s circuit. Too few opportunities for overtaking, and although there are some challenging corners (Estoril and the Imola chicane), it didn’t really facilitate close, or high g-force racing.
The same happened in Adelaide, later that year, where Ayrton crashed into race leader Mansell. Of course, it wasn't intentional, every driver can make a mistake. Here, in France, Senna was the victim.
Mansell brake tested Senna in Australia.
Mansell had nothing to do with it. Senna put him out of the race and the British was angry about that. He was leading, when AS crashed into him. Just like in 1993 at Monza, when Senna did the same to Brundle.
Mansell brake tested Senna in Adelaide 1992. His own countryman Stirling Moss even stated that had he (Mansell) done it to him he would have taken his head off.
Brake tested ? Senna completely ruined Mansell's race, robbing him off a potential victory. No question that Senna was to blame, Nigel was (rightfully) very angry with him. It was Mansell's last race in F1 (before switching to IndyCar), and he wanted to produce something special, crowning his entire F1 career with a win in his last GP. It could be his 10th triumph in one season, what was a record at the time.
Was Mansell rightfully angry with Senna in Canada 1992? because he was and it was totally Mansell's fault. Mansell wanted to strangle Senna at Spa 87 and guess that was Mansell's fault again. Mansell brake tested Senna at the 1992 Australian race and as usual whinged that he was the innocent party again.
Senna did something similar to Mansell ....Australia 92 , and Brundel , Monza 83
And to Prost in 1989 and 1990.
lord such I think you will find that Senna and Brundle were contesting the British F3 Championship in 1983 ... so perhaps you mean Monza 1993?
As for Senna Schumacher comparisons, I think they both had the widest cars and smallest mirrors in F1 history.
@@stevenwaters7733- he did mean ‘93 when he hit the back of Brundle at the Roggia - he said to Brundle that he’d just missed his braking point.
The last gran era for the real f1 pilots and cars !!!!
Today you would get a 10 place grid penalty for less
Senna got away with far worse.
@@barrierodliffe4155 lol what? So you're saying it's sennas fault? You're delusional
@@bZLxcz
Bozo, try learning how to read.
I never said the collision in 1992 was Senna's fault. I replied to the comment that today Schumacher would get a 10 place grid penalty for less. I agree since the collision was Schumacher's fault and unlike Senna he admitted it straight away. Again just for you. Senna got away with far worse.
I trust you understand.
@@barrierodliffe4155 Im starting to think you are a senna fanboy, because I see you in every video related to senna
@@bZLxcz
Bozo, you can think what you like and tell as many lies as you like. I hardly look at Senna videos but Senna was in some Prost or Schumacher videos.
Take notice of the title of the video.
This video is interesting because it shows Schumacher trying to do the same thing Senna did in 1989 when Senna crashed into Prost. I support Senna in this case just as I support Prost in that case, at least I am consistent unlike Senna fanboys.
To me it looked like Senna's car turned in on Michael.
Martin Senna had to turn to the right to take the corner totally Schumacher's fault.
But you have to give another car enough space if it's on your inside. I mean Schumacher couldn't simply disappear from the position he was in or could he? From what Senna said in the interview in the video it appears to me as he didn't looked in his mirror and he had no idea that Schumacher was so close. Yes Schumacher was probably a bit to late on the bakes but you should also use your mirrors if cars are everywhere around you.
yeah, you are more expererienced than James Hunt
Darren Walton similar to crash Senna Prost 89... Then it was Senna fault due Prost can had right to turn???
No Prost didn't have a right to turn in so early at Suzuka 1989. He wouldn't have made the chicane with the trajectory he had chosen.
Yeah, and when he did the same to Prost in Japan back in 1989, he accused Prost. It was never his fault, but someone elses.
Wojciech Matyszkiewicz I think you mean 1990.
No, Suzuka 1989, when he barged into Prost in the chicane (both were driving fo McLaren at that time), overestimating his abilities and the distance. Then, of course, he did the same in 1990 before the first corner, but at least he didn't accuse Prost.
Are you joking or what? Suzuka 89 is a totally different situation. Senna and Prost were almost side by side when the french intentionally turned earlier for the corner, hitting the brazilian in the chicane and so avoiding that Senna overtakes him and took de lead. In 92 French GP, Schumacher hit Senna's rear tire. He wasn't even close to overtake Senna. In Suzuka 1990, Senna hit Prost clearly on purpous, as a vengeance for being disqualified in Suzuka 89 by Prost's godfather, Mr Jean Marie Balestre, whom put the title on the french's lap by making that dirty decision.
Senna was behind Prost in 1989 when Prost started to turn and senna's front wheel hit the side of Prost's car, Senna was not almost side by side, his front wing was only just in front of Prost's rear wheel when Senna drove into Prost..
It's never Senna's fault. He's a GOD🤣
Senna is the best f1 driver of all times.
He was very lucky that day that his car (Schumacher) was still working otherwise Senna probably would've punched him right in the face right there..
I dont want to mention how much Senna should be ""punched in the Face"" for taking out other Cars in his whole Carrer.
Nah!
@@kallo182 Senna didn't crash out anyone other than Prost in 1990. Schumacher famously turned into Damon Hill, Jacques Villeneuve, and several others in his career.
@@chrisclermont456 94 his car was a tripod and hill impatient.def Not bis fault. watch the replay. 97 was a dumb mistake, should have let villeneuve Go to the gravel. got what he deserved for it though
the thought of little Senna picking a fist fight with the uber fit schumi.... Thank God he went on to win 7 wdcs instead of 7 years for hitting a child
Signature Schumacher move
O Schumacher desde jovem não dava moleza para os concorrentes.
Perci Borges De Almeida Logo mais a frente. Senna chutou ele dá pista. Aí é largada e tal. Mta confusão. Mano a mano. Ele conheceu a famosa porta fechada do Senna hahaha
@@MrTomsimoes tem piloto que entra pra vencer, Senna se deu mau na pista, Schumacher se deu mau esquiando ....
Perci Borges De Almeida Você sabe q carro do Senna quebrou numa solda na barra de direção . Ali até Robinho morria com lança entrando no crânio.
@@MrTomsimoesa causa se torna irrelevante diante do resultado ocorrido.
Perci Borges De Almeida ??
That was a quick trip for the McLaren team then across the English Channel
They really overcomplicated the starting grid animation back then XD
Anyone else who turns into another car like that is considered a dangerous driver, but since it was Senna... the blame is put on the driver of the car Senna turned into.
Young Michael saw the opening; and took it. Senna should have known that turning into a car, while entering a corner under heavy braking, would result in at least one car being taken out of the race.
Ford Escort in 3:14 ?
50/50. Can’t blame one more than other
Where are my mindless Michael Schumi fanboys??? Make yourself known!
Schumacher should’ve yielded as he was not ahead of Senna therefore the racing line was Senna’s.
Just like Suzuka 1989 when Senna should have yielded, Prost was in front.
@@barrierodliffe4155 theres no point lad. The fact of the matter is senns's fans whitwash over all his flaws and try to blame the other drivers for his mistakes. Him just like Schumacher made plenty of mistakes which they are no gods, just two of the best to ever do it. Personally i think the British f1 media are a disgrace and biased against schumi especially brundle who is an idiot
Free throw for harden.
Michael Schumacher - Colin McRae of Formula 1. Although has more titles 😉
Senna turned in to Schumacher!!
Just listen the engines which F1 cars had back then... I barely heard what Ayrton said in his interview... in my opinion F1 died in 2014, because of changes in regulations, and finally the main change - V6 hybrid era crap. Someone will say that current engines are faster, more effective etc. but for me V12 and V10 were one of the main reasons why I was interested in F1 until 2012....
The 2 greatest
A fórmula 1 sem o Senna acabou !
Schumacher lo choca a propósito a Senna .
Senna GOAT
Love that Giorgio Moroder - Ivory Tower song as intro
Sad these two didn't battle for more than they did cos of Senna's death of course
Senna thought .....I 'm Senna , i can do whatever i want !!!! That was before !!! In racing everybody is equal ! Schumacher had to come and prove that !!! We have had enough of Senna's attitude !!!!
Senna was the man at that time and Schumacher was at fault here. Senna was no angel for sure but what are you talking about saying people had enough of Senna's attitude? Schumacher's attitude was worse, punting Damon Hill off to win a championship, tried to do the same to Villeneuve but thankfully got what he deserved and DNF himself, the fake mistake in Monaco qualy 2006.....the list goes on. Michael was a great driver but one of the dirtiest too.
@@endlessmotion2255you must look at the video with Damon Hill again. Why should he let him pass ??????? He defended his position ? It is what everybody else does ! Damon Hill pushed it !!!! It didnt work out !! And do you know why ? Because Schumo never tryied to win a race in a lap ! He studied his opponent and when he was sure that he can do it without hurting him or the car , he went for it ! Everybody else in racing , untill now , try to win in the first lap !!!! As far as Villeneuve , who is he ??????? A spoiled brat who came in f1 because he didnt know what else to do with his life ! He got what he deserved !!!!
I think you need to go back and watch the video again. Look how sharply and aggressively Michael turns into Damon. It's not the normal racing line he's taking as he's heading to jump right over the curb and cut the corner if Damon isn't there. He knew exactly what he was doing when faced with the prospect of losing the championship in that moment. The same happened again in 1997. It was a trait of Michael's unfortunately, as good of a driver as he was.
Who was commentating alongside Murray Walker?
Pretty sure it's James Hunt
Confirmed, the great James Hunt R.I.P.
its too clear that he squeezed Michael in that corner on purpose, Michael has been on his side way before the corner entry point. you would be blind to see otherwise
Quixpeed Afterwards Schumacher said he was at fault.
Too bad Senna didn;t say he was at fault like in 1989 or 1990 when he drove into Prost.
Of course those of who know F1's history know that Senna admitted in 1991 that he took Prost out in 1990. As for 1989 that was six of one & half a dozen of the other.
Unfortunately Senna lied in 1990 and only admitted the truth over a year later.
Senna couldn't tell the truth in 1990 because Balestre would have sanctioned him, he eventually told the truth 364 days later.
Couldn't have Palmer interviewed Senna in a more quieter environment?
Für mich war das Absicht, genau so hat er schon mal einen BMW abgeschossen.❗👎 😵 🥴
Schumacher war alles aber garantiert kein Sportsmann.❗👎
Den Namen Schummel Schummi hat er sich mehr als verdient.❗🤮
Senna always expected the others to be pussies and back out, as soon as he closes the door...
And bullshit he did not see him. 😂
Senna was a great driver, but also a lil princess, when someone except him dared to have will to win a race.
Exactly he used the precense of Ron Denis and Mclaren and Honda to put away the other drivers
@@filipborin555 If anyone can decipher this comment, please get in touch.
Schumacher was the dirtiest driver of all time.
Clearly haven't watched Senna 😂😂
@@patrickbateman529Senna is the best driver who ever set foot in f1, love it or hate it but that's a fact.
Esto era Schumacher. Ver a tantos considerándolo el mejor y vos sabes, porque lo viste en tiempo real hacer este tipo de cagadas, que era un… voluble. Te perdonamos, Schumi, pero dejaste muchas páginas feas escritas con tinta indeleble.
the target was Senna.!
Senna
The two dirtiest drivers in F1 history
dick head xut up.
that race could have been good for Senna it rained
Just like Spain 1991, it rained there too, oops.
Barrie Rodliffe Senna hater spotted. Ive seen you talking shit about him on other comments, shame on you
@@acidocloridrico9168
Maybe you like to lie but you have only ever seen me telling the truth. The Shame is yours for being a liar.
In this video I have said Senna was right and Schumacher wrong.
3:28!!! forever
Senna did nothing wrong 100% Schumacher's fault.
Just like it was Senna's fault in Suzuka 1989 when he wanted to overtake Prost before the chicane, Prost closed the door, Senna barged into him, effectively destroying his race and later was furious that he got disqulified for illegal pushing by stewards.
What the hell does Suzuka 1989 have to do with this accident, it was completely different. In Suzuka 89 Senna was alongside Prost, who turned into him (turned early in fact) to crash them out and win the title. Senna proved it was a perfectly good manoeuvre by doing exactly the same to Nannini later, who didn't want to crash into him. The race was meaningless for Prost, he was after the title. Senna was disqualified by Balestre for cutting the chicane, supposedly gaining an advantage from that. Apparently Balestre wanted Senna to turn the car around, drive in the opposite direction and rejoin.
Senna did not give Schumacher any space so is 50-50, Senna just turned like nobody was there
Darren Walton
I know. The cheek of Schumacher to have his car anywhere near Senna when the great man was turning to go round a corner. Senna is a dirty hypocrite.
Senna didn't have to give Schumacher any space because he was in front, Schumacher hit Senna's right rear tyre. Schumacher was starting his 14th F1 race, this accident shows his lack of F1 experience.
The same situation of the Senna x Prost crash in Japan, 1989!
Se senna nao tivesse morrido esse alemao. Nao ia ganhar esses titulos sujos que ele ganhou.
I was there.
What a disappointment to see Senna being eliminated by a panzer.
What will forever separate these two champions : arrogance, lack of humanity, benevolence, the result at all costs on one side.
The plume,the class,the poetry of the other.
Senna was just as bad, if not worse than Schumacer.
Schumachers fault. The "Schumelschumi"
Neste tipo de desporto ninguém pode acusar ninguém... O senna colocou vários fora de pista intencionalmente.. Então a do mansell foi ridícula
Falta do Schumi
Would’ve been amazing to see these two go at it in the 90’s
Matt JC This is the 90's.
Blaaaah blaaaah blaaaah. ...to much judgement here....
Only the win counts...no matter how...so do what needs to be done and never feel guilty. ..that is what makes a champion. So normal racing incident here...NO ONE TO BLAME!!!!
Senna couldn’t bully Schumacher
Couldn't bully or out-drive him 3 WDC vs 7 WDC baby
Gracie Schumacher
@Jennifer Maple when did that happen?
No he just cheated with an illegal car.
@@urbanrider7981 which was never proved, which means its bullshit
@Retro Lover No traction control was ever found...about blistering starts you are talking... th-cam.com/video/BR6SgKEFLOk/w-d-xo.html
does this look like blistering start?...as i said...bullshit.