The actual villain of the movie was a freaking mockery of the suffering Disney put Bobby Driscoll through .They basically killed him and now they laugh at him .
@@anonymouslucario285 at first I'd agree with this but if you look at all the movies they made, all of the characters they own, and Disney decides to specifically pick Peter pan with that specific back story of being washed up....
@@murasakiusagi5124 ... Or maybe because of the whole "never grow up" thing, he makes a good stand in for child actors that grow up bitter from their experience?
Peter Pan being a villain in the movie reminds me when they made Scrappy-Doo the antagonist in the first live-action Scooby-Doo movie. At least with Scrappy-Doo, I could understand the joke behind that since people used to despise that character. Making old, washed-up Peter Pan the villain is such a bizarre choice, and when you take into account the original voice actor’s life story, it’s borderline criminal that they pulled this shit.
@Joshua Munn They could’ve gotten a grown up Caillou to be the main villain, because Charlie Brown’s VA offed himself, that also would have been seen as disrespectful
@@redninja3056 You know if you had said "Well the horrible people that made the decision to kick him out are probably long dead or really old and senile at this point ,so the new ceo didnt know of this incident so that why they let the writers to have older peter pen exist in the movie "that would make sense but instead you decide to say oh its fine to throw him into the dirt and mock him beyond the grave ,you absolute idout
In regards to the "real Muppet being cheaper point": the thing is that in Disney's eyes, it wouldn't be. It's much easier for them to employ dozens of overworked and underpaid, non-unionized 3D animators than to pay a few unionized performers a living wage
Non-unionized you say? You know, in the era of cinema where everything is CG, it would be crazy if there was an animator strike akin to the writers strike from 2008.
@@randocommando7945 Yes. Or at least using less CGI. The CG industry is so bloated, I don't know why anyone wants to be a 3D animator nowadays. They get paid less than the average tradesman lol
I’d doubt that if not for the fact I’ve been on the most depraved part of the internet and have *SEEN* the infestation fetish tag. Maybe they slipped it under the radar by feigning innocence about what could be considered fetish fuel to the executives since they probably don’t know certain types of depravity outside of a certain island.
I’d doubt that if not for the fact I’ve been on the most depraved part of the internet and have *SEEN* the infestation fetish tag. Maybe they slipped it under the radar by feigning innocence about what could be considered fetish fuel to the executives since they probably don’t know certain types of depravity outside of a certain island.
Since the early trailers didn't show Gadget, I just assumed she was gonna be the villain because she was sick of her fandom's creepy obsessions with her.
Or maybe you could go the opposite direction, what if during the movie, Peter kept referring to this boss that he had that demanded Chip ‘N Dale be kidnapped by him, and at the end of the movie that boss is revealed to be Gadget who wanted Chip ‘N Dale kidnapped so they could make more seasons illegally, and she could be adored again, she could even have henchmen who are just a bunch of furries
“Are you though?” Has to be about the most concrete counter claim to their self awareness that gets funnier every time Dumbsville used it. Especially because they’re the ones who put it in the movie to begin with
@@Tediez_the_honored_one the movie shouldve just been about ugly sonic. everything with chip and dale occurs offscreen while ugly sonic goes about his life then randomly shows up to the others at the finale. this genuinely sounds better than the actual movie
In case anyone was confused about the Russian Cult quip: Yes, Gadget has a genuine cult following in Russia. It’s called Rangerphile, and she’s essentially a god. No I am not joking.
I think this is why I like Better Call Saul. It doesn't rely on Breaking Bad cameos to the point where the show is just an ad for BrBa. Hell, some say you can watch Better Call Saul before Breaking Bad and it'd work really well. Edit: Sad how some people are focusing on my last, albeit stupid, point and not the main one.
The only good thing about this movie is honestly how the legal team was able to get so many non-Disney IPs into the movie. Those lawyers need one hell of a vacation.
Everything else is far more forgivable compared to the massive, steaming shit they took on Bobby's legacy. It's all too much to be a coincidence, and unbelievably scummy to play a genuine tragedy for laughs.
Honestly makes me really sad to hear, not that I enjoyed watching the movie in the first place when I was forced to watch it, but hearing this pisses me off way more than any Shitty Cameo/Animation
@@lordfarquaad1319 considering they filmed that garbage-ass Mulan reboot at a concentration camp still in active service in China, it's not hard to put it past them.
I find it incredible that there are people who defend this movie saying things like "I think people doing the film didn't knew about the Peter Pan voice actor." Disney...Disney, anyone in Disney knew about Bobby Driscoll, the child actor their studio exploded for years in multiple movies... The one that had a close relationship with Walt Disney himself, the one they wouldn't accept in the studio specifically after his last role as Peter Pan...and coincidentally Peter Pan's problem is the same as the actor's, they used him and discarded him like garbage for the same thing, they been doing this film since 2014 and no one ever discussed it in the process...poor Disney, they didn't know, it's clearly an accident, of course, the multi-billion dollar studio that owns everything with the ability to hire so many writers, directors, and experts in the animation and film medium in general is the real victim of this controversy. But keep defending a garbage movie in denial because you think you can't get anything better from Disney of all things. And yes, Dale looks like shit.
@@Ihatenamehandles Also from the company who owned it....And to desperately show how "Meta" they can get of themselves. Except Disney does it with...idk ...the subtlety of a kujal on a baby hedgehog.
@@redhood7650 Hey, I'm pretty curious about this whole cult thing; could you please explain it for me? It sounds pretty wild, but I don't want the FBI/MI6 looking at that in my search history...
The fact that Who Framed Roger Rabbit had a lower budget than Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers yet still has better animation is laughable Plus, Chip 'n Dale: Failed Attempt at Metafiction proves that Disney is just as morally bankrupt as they are creatively
@Joshua Munn considering modern Disney and it's hatred of Jessica rabbits two round friends,why do you think they didn't get a sequel? Plus it's a film that doesn't need a sequel Tbh
Disney the conglomerate corp-heads may be creatively (and morally) bankrupt. But at least not the animation departments like WDAS and DTVA. With that said, this movie is indeed a trainwreck.
Films were lower budget back in the 80s. Roger Rabbit was the most expensive movie at the time and would probably be a lot more expensive than Chip N Dale Rescue Rangers if it was made today. Also, Rescue Rangers has a lower budget than most of Disney's theatrical movies made in recent years.
I'll be real with you. Never wanted to do that to Gadget when watching reruns of Chip and Dale while living with my grandma but I will say this: Gadget and Chip were an item in the show so for them to not only disrespect that continuity but also disrespect their own Peter Pan actor in this movie shows how far down the Dark Side Disney has gone
I haven't even watch the show but isn't Zipper is supposed to be more of the pet of the group? Like they've could've chosen anybody, ANYBODY, but they had to go with the pet of the group? 🙄
@@whaleping As one person put it Zipper is more of a 'Pulto' type character rather than a 'Goofy' type character. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong since I myself haven't watch the show.
They should've had the police assistant be the "twist villain". When they're in the garage Chip literally tells her that Rescue Rangers never aired in Albany (the town she's from) to which she replies with something like "oh my grandma recorded them for me and sent them to me" which is so nonsensical that it's embarrassing. She could've even been Fat Cat in disguise due to a mutation from the bootleg machine or something. It just pisses me of that they literally forgot about a plot point they set up.
They didn't forget. They purposely set her up to seem like the twist villain when in reality she never was. They even comment on it and how the police chief can't be the villain because it's too obvious. It's dumb but the assistant not being the twist villian was deliberate.
I'm even more confused as to why couldn't she contact the FBI, over ugly Sonic right when they discovered she wasn't really on the villain side. This character has a lot of holes.
@@mrviking2mcall212 thanks for clearing that up this felt like they were trying to bank on the nostalgia of the characters didn't want to put in the effort.
Yeah! It's why I didn't want to see it in the first place. The decision of both styles side by side is a bad idea! Only pick one or the other, NEVER BOTH! Either do it detective pikachu style, or roger rabbit style, not a mix!
Unlike this movie atleast Henry Stickmin got the references right, not only the jokes are executed well but their relevant to the players' choices. Even some of the reference are aren't familiar or you just don't know in general it's still funny.
Disney was like "remember those cheap spoof movies from the 2000s that did nothing but reference things non-stop? Let's do that but with cartoons!" when making the film.
Honestly the whole peter pan thing is confusing, it just seems like such a weird thing to bring up, specially with disney and how extremely careful they are of doing awful stuff then hiding it really well from the public eye, why would you do really careful manovers to hide your bad deeds from the public eye, just to reveal it for a really ass joke in a nostalgia-bait movie? I honestly wouldn't be suprised if this was just one of the writers being sick of disney's shit (judging by the pretty awful CGI, i wouldn't be suprised), so they just sneakingly flipped disney off by bringing up a horrible thing they've done
That theory doesn't hold up lmao. Pete was a major character in the story to be sunck in like like that by ONE writer. Disney would've caught that if your theory was true. I really do believe that Disney went with it.
@@Player-jh4ko it's just really strange for a company to be so extremely careful of hiding their actions only to ruin it completely just for a bad joke in a pretty boring movie, it's like if you're making an incredible drawing that's taken you months only for you at the end to just destroy it completely for a meme. It just doesn't make any sense with how much they've protected their public image to just make a dark jab at themselves being awful
I reeeeaaally think the whole Peter Pan thing is creepy as hell, there were so many other options they could've chosen that didn't crap on someone's actual pain
They could've had a plot addressing that they're celshaded characters in reality and they could've spent the journey trying to go back to their own 2D dimension, the references and meta stuff wouldve made more sense that way
Gadget banging Zipper was so disgusting, like he was a pet to them, they would feed him and he act like a smart child they would teach.... Even my kid was asking why did the girl mouse marry and get pregnant with the pet fly? At this point I don't know what's worse, Gadget willingly screwing the childlike pet making it seem sorta pedophilic(and no giving zipper a deep voice doesn't change what it looks like) or that gadget went down the inter species route and rule 34 is full of it.
@@En_Joshi-Godrez Gadget and Dale were always ship bait from the beginning, and Dale wasn't some pet in universe, like how Pluto is compared to Goofy. Yes they retconned Zipper into being more like the Rescue Rangers, but it also makes less sense that his actor apparently decided to not talk and act animal like in the original series.
@@redninja3056 bitch wtf are you trying to say? the only thing OP's comment boils down to is "that pairing is gross for this reason" you sure you're not overthinking here, bud?
Since Peter Pan has a lot of emotional connection to me since it's a movie that me and my cousin watched when we were kids, I am utterly disgusted by how he was treated in this. Thanks for the review, Dumbs and JS. Keep on gaming. Also 8:37 unironically goes hard.
I watched the movie with my grandma and she liked the movie but hated Peter Pan’s portrayal in it, though I don’t think she knows about the whole Bobby Driscoll thing
I feel like this movie was "entertaining" to say the most. Like it didn't have any lasting impact on me, or a story that warranted any discussion or even strove to be anything. It was just kind of an hour long experience that made me smile a little bit more than it made me frown. I'd definitely watch it over any "bad" movie but I don't think I'll ever take the time to watch it more than once.
Sometimes that's all a movie needs to be. Frankly, I'm happy that those movies like that exist because it makes the masterpieces that do leave a lasting impact shine all the more.
Disney: We don't want to be associated with furries -that we unintentionally created- Also Disney: We made a retconed, black-coded fly have 50 babies with Gadget.
Out of all the members of the Rescue Rangers Gadget would wind up with it still boggles the mind how she would have ended up with Zipper. Also I could have lived without seeing any their freak mutant babies. Seriously, what the hell were they thinking with that?
Fun fact: If you buy the special edition of Chip and Dale: Rescue Rangers, and explore the audio settings, you'll be able to hear Richard Williams thrashing around in his grave.
Ironically Ugly Sonic isn’t the worst thing about this film, that would definitely be the situation with the villain…and maybe the Gadget/Zipper pairing.
11:04 the thing is, it was Pluto that was intended to be the antagonist of the film, which makes sense given how he was the antagonist in many of the Chip and Dale shorts
i'll be honest, i only got to watching the 2022 movie because of my mom. my mom was an awespiring fanatic into stuff like looney tunes, tigra, chip 'n dale, all the oldie cartoon stuff back when she was in her youth. and for her to see the movie and see all these references to cartoons she knew, it was wholesome in a way to see your parent just bond over these old memories of stuff they've grown a love for cherished over the decades. brings even me, as an adult, a tear to my eye.
I like how in the movie, they try to make people think Chip 'n Dale was bigger than it really was, like I think most people would remember DuckTales than Chip 'n Dale
The sad part is that some of the concepts really had potential but ended up falling on it's face, like if they were going to use Pete as the villain of the movie, they could of at least redeemed him, like what if as he's getting arrested, Mickey shows up and admits how both him and Disney ruined his life and how he wants to make things right, it would of showed how Disney isn't afraid of admitting to the misdeeds and taking responsibility for them
Who Framed Rodger rabbit is still the best Crossover movie ever...Which is kind of sad when you think about it especially how much thing's have evolved with technology and story telling😔
Atleast Who Framed Roger Rabbit" had tasteful comedy and warmth to it. Despite the jokes on cartoon being a dangerous force of nature for humans. Since the whole joke on cartoons surviving stuff that would normally kill humans was funny. Whereas Rescue Rangers 2022 was just lame adult humour put unto childrens cartoon characters all the time.
A good fammade sequel: Roger and a new detective now own Valiant detective agency, the film not only properly animates its characters, but is shot alike the Office (adding new innovation), the plot is about a corporate Giant (alike Zazlav) doing evil stuff to their workers- animated AND live action (maybe throw in the Dip or an evolution of it for digital ink).
Honestly, I think that the high pitched voices would just get grating. I think that saying that the squeaky voices being voice acting was a good way to explain why they didn’t have them.
“…mete…self-referential, and cool.” Translate into “We didn’t have an original idea so were hoping that Bait and switching the fans is going to cause outrage so people more will watch the movie.”
Best thing about this movie was 4chan furries freaking out and cursing Jews because a fly did it with a mouse. That was... a thing. Edit: I'm glad you also talked about how much John Mulaney sucks, most overrated "comedian" of all time only liked by Tumblr weirdos.
There’s like, two skits of his that I actually like. And that would be the “The One Thing You Can’t Replace”, and “The Salt and Pepper Diner.” Which aren’t funny because of how he delivers them, but just because the situations are decently funny. If anything the delivery detracts from it.
The thing about John Mulaney is that yeah, he's got some funny material, but then it gets reposted to hell and back and whatever semblance of "funny" that happened to be in whatever joke he was telling is now run completely dry, because all Tumblr users know how to do is milk anything and everything of every last drop. Like, I can't tell you how many times I've seen the Salt and Pepper Diner skit, except it's with fucking Hamilton characters or whatever they're obsessing over that week.
I will remind everyone that The Rise of Skywalker’s audience score was stuck at an 84% for months in end (in fact, it might still be stuck at that), proving that Disney can just make Rotten Tomatoes give them an 80-ish percentage score, even when no one f*cking likes the movie. I have not seen one person compliment this movie, so it must be the mouse twisting the tomato’s arm, again.
Checked it, and only the verified ones are at 86, all audience puts it at 76. Verified: 50k+ reviews All: 100k+ reviews. In conclusion, yeah lots of fake 5 star reviews for a shit movie.
What really pisses me off is that they couldn't even be bothered to animate most of the 2D characters in ACTUAL 2D. Disney proved they could still do it with Mary Poppins Returns, they just didn't WANT to for this movie because the focus was so clearly on harvesting as many IPs as possible.
This movie would have fit Bonkers, another Disney Afternoon show, WAY better because his cartoon was already SET in a world where humans and cartoons coexisted and was already LOADED with Disney cameos. It's obvious Chip and Dale were used instead because of nostalgia but...The movie wasn't BUILT for them. Ignoring the faults and controversies, the movie feels like it was meant for Bonkers but Chip and Dale were plastered on the front because they'd sell more.
I think that what separates this from Freiberg and Seltzer is that their "jokes" were far more raunchy and inappropriate, and the movies were aimed at teens and adults (Which may indicate that critics and audiences are going easy on the movie because "it's for kids").
Disney has so much money and influence that they can pay for anything that was ever copyrighted in history out of chump change. This is just them flexing the control they have over media and culture (and if anyone budges against them, they have enough lawyers and lawmakers in their pockets to make their lives miserable)
4:05 Fun fact about this scene, that simpsons parody character was originally going to be graggle simpson but Matt Groening veto'd the idea when disney approached him about it because, in his words "According to all official sources, Graggle never went to school, this scene would not make sense."
I get what the film was trying to do it was try to capture that Deadpool/Roger rabbit levels of success with Easter eggs,meta humor, and crossovers but they forgot what made those movies so successful.and I feel that's what hurt the film
I am still confused af on how this movie, which is basically just Epic Movie done a bit better got an 82% on Rotten Tomatoes but Murder on the Orient Express, an actual competent and good film, got only a 61%. We live in a society 💀
Take review sites with a grain of salt, since some actual good movies can get review bombed to drop the rating, or people have poor judgment and taste. Same with a bad movie somehow having high reviews when you look at actual fans opinions that tell the truth.
The most upsetting part is that we’ve seen with films like Encanto that Modern Disney has the capacity to put heart into their films but they just don’t give a shit because it’ll make big bucks anyways Edit: changed "make good films" to "put heart into their films" because apparently Encanto being good or not was the big kicker of my comment lmao
@@reddodeado Bruh Encanto was the best Disney movie since Zootopia, which at that point had been like 5 years old. So whatever you’re smoking, I want some too.
Now this review hits the nail on the head, but it sucks that this is now a showcase for John Mulaney and Andy Samberg’s voice acting talents. They really CAN act well when the directing and script is good, look at Into the Spider-Verse and Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs for example of how well they CAN do. But….this sure as hell doesn’t have a good director or script.
I'm just so goddamn sick of movies being "ironic' and "self-aware". Judging by this film's scores though, the rest of the world can't get enough of it.
At 12:00 funnily enough there is a movie starring a guy who shot a guy irl and because he hated him, the film is obvs the assassin's perspective. I'm talking about Prince Yusupov making a movie titled "I killed Rasputin" and he himself is in it.
Good Grief! The animation in this film makes "Out of Jimmy's Head" look like "Who Framed Roger Rabbit"! :/ 19:27 Very valid point. This felt less like a Chip 'n' Dale movie and more like a bootleg sequel to "Who Framed Roger Rabbit". Honestly the plot of this film would have probably been better if instead of just Chip 'n' Dale they included the rest of the old Disney Afternoon line-up.
Last time I remember, Russia doesn't have Disney+ and it looks like they're not releasing this movie in theaters in countries that don't have Disney+. They apparently only do that for movies that were originally slated for theaters in the US and internationally and were completed before they changed that decision.
So I just watched Despicable Me 3 for the first time which also features a former child star who got let go because he got older and became a villain because of it which also made me remember the movie "Cats don't Dance" which also features a child star who's the villain. Between those movies and Chip n' Dale-- and call me crazy-- I legitimately believe that Hollywood is well aware that they treat child stars like sh💩t and love making fun of them for it. By the way, the villain from Cats don't Dance is supposedly inspired by Shirley Temple and while she was one of the few child stars that didn't end up crazy, she still endured a lot of messed up stuff.
Darla Dimple was based on Shirley Temple. Granted, she had a tough life after puberty, but Darla's characterization was based on an old joke about Shirley really being a surly dwarf pretending to be a sweet kid. They made that joke because they found her persona _too_ cute and therefore annoying. Also, the character was still a kid while the real person had long grown out of that persona, which she also hated, so I doubt she was very offended by it.
Gotta admire how easily entertained the internet is to be collectively together on the bad design of Sonic, then to act like it’s all good because they made him acknowledge he’s ugly. And they act like just cause they use him at the end as a “undercover fbi” twist makes it any better. Like good job writers, you know how to please people who don’t know better.
Every person who ever compared this movie to Roger Rabbit in a positive way needs to be strapped to a chair with their eyelids pried open, Clockwork Orange style, and forced to watch these two movies back to back for a *week,* just to get the point across. Then, they should be made to watch this one for a *month,* just to really set in how horrible it truly is.
Chip N Dale is one of the weirdest movies I have ever seen and I really don’t understand all the high praise surrounding this movie aside from Disney bias (because let’s be honest if this was from another studio critics would’ve have hated it)
I noticed during my high-school years that a lot of criticisms directed toward non-Disney movies apply just as well to Disney movies, and it’s sad to see that that bias remains today even as people have generally become more aware of how shit the company is.
18:13 While the 1st Winnie the Pooh is in the Public Domain, the work that introduces Tigger called _The House at Pooh Corner_ is still copyrighted, as it was released in 1928. Also, Disney’s design of Pooh Bear is still Trademarked.
I genuinely just don’t care about this movie because of how bad it is but I’m really kinda upset Disney has got to a point to make the main villain the old Peter Pan knowing probably full well what they were doing it and oh don’t get me started on sonic and gadget- it’s just bazaar to me
To be fair, there's alot of movies that called off tragic events/deaths, like the 9/11 movie that was based of a horrible event that killed thousands of people(obviously). But I'm probably wrong lmao. Just my opinion.
The legends say I'm still falling to this day
Don't You mean falling with style JS?
Then Just Stop falling, duhhhh
@@eskimopython2807 Ha. It's meta because Just Stop is in on the joke!
He fell in reverse until he reached the heavens
What is this some kind of cross over event?
The actual villain of the movie was a freaking mockery of the suffering Disney put Bobby Driscoll through .They basically killed him and now they laugh at him .
@@anonymouslucario285 There is no fucking way it was a coincidence, please don't defend this horrible thing they did.
@@anonymouslucario285 Oh no, they knew, but it's disney
@@anonymouslucario285 at first I'd agree with this but if you look at all the movies they made, all of the characters they own, and Disney decides to specifically pick Peter pan with that specific back story of being washed up....
No it wasn’t
@@murasakiusagi5124 ... Or maybe because of the whole "never grow up" thing, he makes a good stand in for child actors that grow up bitter from their experience?
Peter Pan being a villain in the movie reminds me when they made Scrappy-Doo the antagonist in the first live-action Scooby-Doo movie. At least with Scrappy-Doo, I could understand the joke behind that since people used to despise that character. Making old, washed-up Peter Pan the villain is such a bizarre choice, and when you take into account the original voice actor’s life story, it’s borderline criminal that they pulled this shit.
Yeah, there is a difference between making fun of a fake character and a real person who went through actual suffering.
It's not just a Disney issue, but it's a hollywood issue in general when it comes to former child actors
It also helps that Scrappy-Doo is not a real person who died of a drug overdose, and just a divisive cartoon character.
@@dumbsville The original villain for the Rescue Rangers film was gonna be Pluto funnily enough
@Joshua Munn They could’ve gotten a grown up Caillou to be the main villain, because Charlie Brown’s VA offed himself, that also would have been seen as disrespectful
It’s sad that The Amazing World of Gumball blends different animation styles better then a Disney movie
The Amazing World Of Gumball does most things better than a Disney movie
It because that CN show was amazing!
*than a Disney movie
God damn I miss the amazing world of gumball.
CN has always been better than Disney :/
The fact that Disney mocked someone they tossed aside so haphazardly to the point it resulted in his death is definitely par for the course for them.
It's not like its their fault they had no use for him so they didn't need him anymore I always say no joke should be censored
@@redninja3056 this is literally mocking him and it’s not even a funny joke no one is laughing at this
@@redninja3056 so pushing someone to death is excusable now?
@@civiltrack3583 I am it's fucking funny get over it
@@redninja3056 You know if you had said "Well the horrible people that made the decision to kick him out are probably long dead or really old and senile at this point ,so the new ceo didnt know of this incident so that why they let the writers to have older peter pen exist in the movie "that would make sense but instead you decide to say oh its fine to throw him into the dirt and mock him beyond the grave ,you absolute idout
The most surprising thing about movie that isn't Ugly Sonic was the fact that Zipper and Gadget did it, and had mutant hybrid babies.
excuse me….FUKIN WHAT?!
Unironically this.
I think I'm gonna vomit
Mfw race mixing in my disney movies
THANK YOU! SOMEONE SASID IT.
In regards to the "real Muppet being cheaper point": the thing is that in Disney's eyes, it wouldn't be. It's much easier for them to employ dozens of overworked and underpaid, non-unionized 3D animators than to pay a few unionized performers a living wage
This movie reflects nothing more than Disney’s purest evils
Non-unionized you say? You know, in the era of cinema where everything is CG, it would be crazy if there was an animator strike akin to the writers strike from 2008.
@@rootfelixfake6716 I wonder if that would encourage film studios to return to using practical effects
@@randocommando7945 Yes. Or at least using less CGI. The CG industry is so bloated, I don't know why anyone wants to be a 3D animator nowadays. They get paid less than the average tradesman lol
@@rootfelixfake6716 lol, you can't get Animator Strike if you outsource those stuff
They should’ve had the villain be Darth Jar Jar instead of a grown up Peter Pan
Yeah, i agree
If that is the case, then it should be possible mostly cuz of how he was overhated to the point on, well you can guess what happens next.
Yeah, They did Peter Pan dirty
Or Pinocchio. That would've been funny
Indeed
…the gadget thing was a screenwriter’s fetish. Without doubt. They just *had* to specify that she had a ton of kids with the fly.
**womb maggots**
@@deptusmechanikus7362 you know there is a woman like maggots on their private part. The More You Know
@@deptusmechanikus7362 🤮
I’d doubt that if not for the fact I’ve been on the most depraved part of the internet and have *SEEN* the infestation fetish tag.
Maybe they slipped it under the radar by feigning innocence about what could be considered fetish fuel to the executives since they probably don’t know certain types of depravity outside of a certain island.
I’d doubt that if not for the fact I’ve been on the most depraved part of the internet and have *SEEN* the infestation fetish tag.
Maybe they slipped it under the radar by feigning innocence about what could be considered fetish fuel to the executives since they probably don’t know certain types of depravity outside of a certain island.
Disney really went "Yeah! we're trying to empower women!" and then made the only girl from the original show into a baby machine, really classy Disney
Its kinda like if Velma was secretly fucking Goofy the entire time......or worse i dunno
@@MILDMONSTER1234 No it’s like Velma was fucking scooby, that’s how weird it is
@@jimmyjohn1684 I'd really suggest you don't search for that on certain sites just a friendly warning
@@redhood7650 NOW you tell me
@@jimmyjohn1684 I was trying to save your innocence
Since the early trailers didn't show Gadget, I just assumed she was gonna be the villain because she was sick of her fandom's creepy obsessions with her.
@Joshua Munn The reactions on the Korean basket weaving forums cartoon board were nothing but pure gold. If anything, Gadget fans deserved this.
Some people said they would have been PEEVED if gadget turned out to be the villain.
Or maybe you could go the opposite direction, what if during the movie, Peter kept referring to this boss that he had that demanded Chip ‘N Dale be kidnapped by him, and at the end of the movie that boss is revealed to be Gadget who wanted Chip ‘N Dale kidnapped so they could make more seasons illegally, and she could be adored again, she could even have henchmen who are just a bunch of furries
That would've been a much better, funnier idea!
@@IcyDiamond that's also a hilarious idea, damn
The fact that the muppet character is CG is a massive sin
That least he was funny.
fr
Frankly, I found this odd since Disney now owns the actual Muppets, and the CG "puppet" reminded me of a Muppet.
@@bluecollie55_movies25 Maybe they didn’t want to use an actual Muppet so to not ruin the brand, idk
the fact I had no idea he was CG means they must have used some pretty good CG.
“Are you though?” Has to be about the most concrete counter claim to their self awareness that gets funnier every time Dumbsville used it. Especially because they’re the ones who put it in the movie to begin with
I'm so sorry for liking this movie but i still think ugly sonic was the best part of the movie next to the puppet guy.
@@Tediez_the_honored_one You mean puppet guy?
@@IcyDiamond yes i mean puppet guy.
@@Tediez_the_honored_one the movie shouldve just been about ugly sonic. everything with chip and dale occurs offscreen while ugly sonic goes about his life then randomly shows up to the others at the finale. this genuinely sounds better than the actual movie
Did Disney just make an entire movie just so they can make fun of one of their victims? Worst part is that they'll get away with it too.
Don't you think "victim" is a bit of an exaggeration?
@@anonymouslucario285 the actor got into drugs BC they didn't even pay him and it's disqusting
@@rhy45bianchi31 what do they mean by "one of" their victims?
@@anonymouslucario285 like Disney did a lot of shitty things
@@anonymouslucario285 Bobby Driscoll the original actor for Peter Pan got fired for getting old and cus of the unfortunate state of child stars
In case anyone was confused about the Russian Cult quip:
Yes, Gadget has a genuine cult following in Russia. It’s called Rangerphile, and she’s essentially a god.
No I am not joking.
THE CULT HAS A NAME?!
That thumbnail was REAL
O
M
G
So, it's about as sane as Christianity. A cult based around a completely fictional character.
@@etinarcadiaego7424 ok dude
@@etinarcadiaego7424 but... Jesus is an actual person who existed??????
I think this is why I like Better Call Saul. It doesn't rely on Breaking Bad cameos to the point where the show is just an ad for BrBa. Hell, some say you can watch Better Call Saul before Breaking Bad and it'd work really well.
Edit: Sad how some people are focusing on my last, albeit stupid, point and not the main one.
because it’s a prequel?
It’s almost like prequels are suppose to come before something.
@DOGE BOI, THE DOOMSLAYER said no one
@Freesmart I think it’s Schaff’s worst opinion he‘s had in a while
@Freesmart Fuck that opinion
“You can’t hurt my feelings if I’m in on the joke!”
This entire movie in a nutshell
Are you though?
Maybe?
The only good thing about this movie is honestly how the legal team was able to get so many non-Disney IPs into the movie. Those lawyers need one hell of a vacation.
Everything else is far more forgivable compared to the massive, steaming shit they took on Bobby's legacy. It's all too much to be a coincidence, and unbelievably scummy to play a genuine tragedy for laughs.
Honestly makes me really sad to hear, not that I enjoyed watching the movie in the first place when I was forced to watch it, but hearing this pisses me off way more than any Shitty Cameo/Animation
im lost
edit: ohhhh thats what you were talking about. yeah no its pretty fucked
Not just a genuine tragedy - one the very same company they were working for caused.
And the worst part was I didn't know about tht till now Jesus Christ tf is wrong with Disney...
@@lordfarquaad1319 considering they filmed that garbage-ass Mulan reboot at a concentration camp still in active service in China, it's not hard to put it past them.
Amazing World of Gumball, a cartoon show mind you, combined a types of animation seen in this movie and pulled it off flawlessly.
Gumball slapped though. It was just a damn good show.
That show was goat they literallly ripped off Oc's and shipping and those 90's sitcoms
Hard to like it when it mostly uses the cal arts style for the main characters
@@darkzeroprojects4245 I respectfully disagree.
@@darkzeroprojects4245 The show used multiple art styles and had ambitious animation throughout its run.
11:06 this is not just a Disney-only issue, but it is a Hollywood issue in general with how they treated former child actors
But it's the fact that they are aware of it and still let it happen is then main problem
They could have condoned this thing instead of being "ah ah, we treat child actors like shit, we don't care and we keep getting away from that!"
@@omnipotentmage I think there should atleast be encouragement that education and skills lasts longer. TV or movie isnt gonna last forever.
I find it incredible that there are people who defend this movie saying things like "I think people doing the film didn't knew about the Peter Pan voice actor." Disney...Disney, anyone in Disney knew about Bobby Driscoll, the child actor their studio exploded for years in multiple movies... The one that had a close relationship with Walt Disney himself, the one they wouldn't accept in the studio specifically after his last role as Peter Pan...and coincidentally Peter Pan's problem is the same as the actor's, they used him and discarded him like garbage for the same thing, they been doing this film since 2014 and no one ever discussed it in the process...poor Disney, they didn't know, it's clearly an accident, of course, the multi-billion dollar studio that owns everything with the ability to hire so many writers, directors, and experts in the animation and film medium in general is the real victim of this controversy. But keep defending a garbage movie in denial because you think you can't get anything better from Disney of all things. And yes, Dale looks like shit.
The gadget and the fly dude having mutant fly rat babies is what distracted me more than whatever plot there was.
I'm not familiar with the show, and yet I was still grossed out by that. I genuinely have no clue what they were trying to ho for.
@@JackedThor-so probably no one you're the one that lets it live rent free in his head
@@redninja3056 arent you also?
If this movie was made by anyone besides Disney, it would've been panned by critics.
This.
you dropped this 🫴👑
It's why I get so frustrated with some..because it's Disney they buy it up.
I SAID THE SAME THING
Let's be real here. This is only funny to people because it's coming from something that was originally made for kids.
@@Ihatenamehandles Also from the company who owned it....And to desperately show how "Meta" they can get of themselves.
Except Disney does it with...idk ...the subtlety of a kujal on a baby hedgehog.
This movie didn’t need to NTR the entire cult of Gadget in Russia, with the fly character, but they did it anyway.
disney's act of Slava Ukraini?
@@blackroberts6290 no they mean about the actual russian cult for gadget
@@redhood7650 the what?
@@redhood7650 Hey, I'm pretty curious about this whole cult thing; could you please explain it for me? It sounds pretty wild, but I don't want the FBI/MI6 looking at that in my search history...
@@blackroberts6290 are you trying to be funny?
The fact that Who Framed Roger Rabbit had a lower budget than Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers yet still has better animation is laughable
Plus, Chip 'n Dale: Failed Attempt at Metafiction proves that Disney is just as morally bankrupt as they are creatively
@Joshua Munn considering modern Disney and it's hatred of Jessica rabbits two round friends,why do you think they didn't get a sequel? Plus it's a film that doesn't need a sequel Tbh
Remember that inflation exists, so that may not actually be true
Disney the conglomerate corp-heads may be creatively (and morally) bankrupt. But at least not the animation departments like WDAS and DTVA. With that said, this movie is indeed a trainwreck.
They spent all the budget on copyright licenses lmfao
Films were lower budget back in the 80s. Roger Rabbit was the most expensive movie at the time and would probably be a lot more expensive than Chip N Dale Rescue Rangers if it was made today. Also, Rescue Rangers has a lower budget than most of Disney's theatrical movies made in recent years.
Say what you want about the movie but there’s one thing we can all agree on
Ugly Sonic made the comeback of the century
Agreed. He carried the film
ugly sonic should’ve been the main villain
THIS IS THE F B I
WE'VE GOT YOU SURROUNDED
True
The dude is unironically the best character in the movie.
I'll be real with you. Never wanted to do that to Gadget when watching reruns of Chip and Dale while living with my grandma but I will say this: Gadget and Chip were an item in the show so for them to not only disrespect that continuity but also disrespect their own Peter Pan actor in this movie shows how far down the Dark Side Disney has gone
I haven't even watch the show but isn't Zipper is supposed to be more of the pet of the group? Like they've could've chosen anybody, ANYBODY, but they had to go with the pet of the group? 🙄
@@Player-jh4ko … pet?
@@whaleping I don't know how to describe it. All I know is that he's not as sentient as the others...
@@whaleping As one person put it Zipper is more of a 'Pulto' type character rather than a 'Goofy' type character. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong since I myself haven't watch the show.
@@Player-jh4ko So more or less the group mascot?
They should've had the police assistant be the "twist villain". When they're in the garage Chip literally tells her that Rescue Rangers never aired in Albany (the town she's from) to which she replies with something like "oh my grandma recorded them for me and sent them to me" which is so nonsensical that it's embarrassing. She could've even been Fat Cat in disguise due to a mutation from the bootleg machine or something. It just pisses me of that they literally forgot about a plot point they set up.
They didn't forget. They purposely set her up to seem like the twist villain when in reality she never was. They even comment on it and how the police chief can't be the villain because it's too obvious. It's dumb but the assistant not being the twist villian was deliberate.
I'm even more confused as to why couldn't she contact the FBI, over ugly Sonic right when they discovered she wasn't really on the villain side. This character has a lot of holes.
@@edman813 that's because nobody trusts her after the accident that she made (which turns out wasn't actually her at the end of the movie)
this movie is like that one kid who thinks he's in on the joke but doesn't understand it at all
The animation both hand drawn and CGI In a live action setting looks uncanny.
There isn’t any hand drawn animation in the movie. The ‘2D’ characters are just cel-shaded 3D models.
Still looks like shit either way.
@@mrviking2mcall212 thanks for clearing that up this felt like they were trying to bank on the nostalgia of the characters didn't want to put in the effort.
Ikr?!
@@maninanikittycat4238 lol.
Yeah! It's why I didn't want to see it in the first place. The decision of both styles side by side is a bad idea! Only pick one or the other, NEVER BOTH! Either do it detective pikachu style, or roger rabbit style, not a mix!
This whole movie is just "I CLAPPED! I CLAPPED WHEN I SAW IT!"
Unlike this movie atleast Henry Stickmin got the references right, not only the jokes are executed well but their relevant to the players' choices. Even some of the reference are aren't familiar or you just don't know in general it's still funny.
Well it’s because the references aren’t really shoved in your face and aren’t the main thing it’s the choices and the comedy
@@thatoneroyalguard7060
yeah
They had a fucking stargate reference
Disney was like "remember those cheap spoof movies from the 2000s that did nothing but reference things non-stop? Let's do that but with cartoons!" when making the film.
Honestly the whole peter pan thing is confusing, it just seems like such a weird thing to bring up, specially with disney and how extremely careful they are of doing awful stuff then hiding it really well from the public eye, why would you do really careful manovers to hide your bad deeds from the public eye, just to reveal it for a really ass joke in a nostalgia-bait movie? I honestly wouldn't be suprised if this was just one of the writers being sick of disney's shit (judging by the pretty awful CGI, i wouldn't be suprised), so they just sneakingly flipped disney off by bringing up a horrible thing they've done
Not a bad theory
That theory doesn't hold up lmao. Pete was a major character in the story to be sunck in like like that by ONE writer. Disney would've caught that if your theory was true. I really do believe that Disney went with it.
@@Player-jh4ko it's just really strange for a company to be so extremely careful of hiding their actions only to ruin it completely just for a bad joke in a pretty boring movie, it's like if you're making an incredible drawing that's taken you months only for you at the end to just destroy it completely for a meme. It just doesn't make any sense with how much they've protected their public image to just make a dark jab at themselves being awful
maybe the producers just had no self awareness and thought that Peter Pan being the villain would be le cool epic reference the smart kids would like
@@T1MAGEDDON they literally filmed the remake version of mulan in a concentration camp in china
I can say that this is one of the movies to be released.
one of the worst movies to be released
@@DeltaBlazin clubs never beat the blockbuster Morbius
Imagine coping a TH-camrs opinion because you think yours wouldn’t matter (it’s ok I don’t understand)
it's on par with Morbius with being one of the movies released.
I reeeeaaally think the whole Peter Pan thing is creepy as hell, there were so many other options they could've chosen that didn't crap on someone's actual pain
The voice acting is what killed it for me. It sounds like they're sarcastic in every scene
They could've had a plot addressing that they're celshaded characters in reality and they could've spent the journey trying to go back to their own 2D dimension, the references and meta stuff wouldve made more sense that way
8-o Wow, okay, I would have liked *that* movie with that plot.
That's pretty stupid this plot is alot better don't make movies
@@redninja3056 okay
Animated characters trying to get back to their animated universe has been done before...
@@maximusprime3459 it has?
Gadget banging Zipper was so disgusting, like he was a pet to them, they would feed him and he act like a smart child they would teach.... Even my kid was asking why did the girl mouse marry and get pregnant with the pet fly?
At this point I don't know what's worse, Gadget willingly screwing the childlike pet making it seem sorta pedophilic(and no giving zipper a deep voice doesn't change what it looks like) or that gadget went down the inter species route and rule 34 is full of it.
Would do you mean "inter species". Are you saying it would be unethical if she hooked up with Dale? Are you ok?
@@En_Joshi-Godrez Gadget and Dale were always ship bait from the beginning, and Dale wasn't some pet in universe, like how Pluto is compared to Goofy. Yes they retconned Zipper into being more like the Rescue Rangers, but it also makes less sense that his actor apparently decided to not talk and act animal like in the original series.
Disney: Interspecies relationships with a child or petlike fly is totally a-ok
Also Disney: NO WE CAN'T SHOW THE GAYS, NOOO-
Tbh if you're thinking that hard about it you might be the problem
@@redninja3056 bitch wtf are you trying to say? the only thing OP's comment boils down to is "that pairing is gross for this reason"
you sure you're not overthinking here, bud?
Wow, who’d knew Disney would stoop as low as to make fun of someone who died by their own hand.
This movie was nothing more than an advertisement that they will continue to make shit like this and not care about what makes it bad.
And they can do it completely legally with no repercussion, I love the justice system...
Since Peter Pan has a lot of emotional connection to me since it's a movie that me and my cousin watched when we were kids, I am utterly disgusted by how he was treated in this. Thanks for the review, Dumbs and JS. Keep on gaming.
Also 8:37 unironically goes hard.
Are you okay?
I watched the movie with my grandma and she liked the movie but hated Peter Pan’s portrayal in it, though I don’t think she knows about the whole Bobby Driscoll thing
I feel like this movie was "entertaining" to say the most. Like it didn't have any lasting impact on me, or a story that warranted any discussion or even strove to be anything. It was just kind of an hour long experience that made me smile a little bit more than it made me frown. I'd definitely watch it over any "bad" movie but I don't think I'll ever take the time to watch it more than once.
like space jam 2
@@bickboi9633 Eh I prefer this over Space Jam 2
@@drumo2273 if anything I hate them both
Too bad for you. I’ve already seen it on Disney+ a whole 20 times.
Sometimes that's all a movie needs to be. Frankly, I'm happy that those movies like that exist because it makes the masterpieces that do leave a lasting impact shine all the more.
Never thought I'd watch Lego Obi-Wan Kenobi and Danny Phantom review a Disney movie, but here I am.
Disney: We don't want to be associated with furries -that we unintentionally created-
Also Disney: We made a retconed, black-coded fly have 50 babies with Gadget.
Out of all the members of the Rescue Rangers Gadget would wind up with it still boggles the mind how she would have ended up with Zipper. Also I could have lived without seeing any their freak mutant babies. Seriously, what the hell were they thinking with that?
FETISH
Also wants zipper like a dog / mascot ? That’s like Velma fucking Scooby
I would love you two to collab again to make a documentary on Bobby Driscoll. It seems like something that definitely should be elaborated on.
Watch Dumbsville add 50 memes to it
@@SonicXtreme99akaCreeperMario 50 thousand
This fever dream of a movie literally felt like a bad TH-cam Poop video
99% of their budget was spent on copyright licenses
This honestly felt like one big fanfiction
@@beadsontotes767 deviantart: the movie
John Mulaney can be good at voice acting when getting the right role. He was good as Spider-Ham.
Edit: He was also great in Puss in Boots 2.
All I hear in this movie is Andrew lol but you're make a decent point
Fun fact: If you buy the special edition of Chip and Dale: Rescue Rangers, and explore the audio settings, you'll be able to hear Richard Williams thrashing around in his grave.
Ironically Ugly Sonic isn’t the worst thing about this film, that would definitely be the situation with the villain…and maybe the Gadget/Zipper pairing.
Ugly Sonic is ironically its best aspect
11:04 the thing is, it was Pluto that was intended to be the antagonist of the film, which makes sense given how he was the antagonist in many of the Chip and Dale shorts
i'll be honest, i only got to watching the 2022 movie because of my mom.
my mom was an awespiring fanatic into stuff like looney tunes, tigra, chip 'n dale, all the oldie cartoon stuff back when she was in her youth.
and for her to see the movie and see all these references to cartoons she knew, it was wholesome in a way to see your parent just bond over these old memories of stuff they've grown a love for cherished over the decades.
brings even me, as an adult, a tear to my eye.
The movie itself turns nostalgia into melancholy at least for me
Should watch Roger Rabbit instead for a more respectful nostalgia movie
@@islandboy9381 oh no, i've seen roger rabbit. all due respect, its much better.
Isn't nostalgia baiting amazing? That means people will like your movie even if all it has going for it is the references!
So the movie is using people childhood memories to get money that's sick!
I like how in the movie, they try to make people think Chip 'n Dale was bigger than it really was, like I think most people would remember DuckTales than Chip 'n Dale
The sad part is that some of the concepts really had potential but ended up falling on it's face, like if they were going to use Pete as the villain of the movie, they could of at least redeemed him, like what if as he's getting arrested, Mickey shows up and admits how both him and Disney ruined his life and how he wants to make things right, it would of showed how Disney isn't afraid of admitting to the misdeeds and taking responsibility for them
Imagine if they used Drake and Josh instead of Chip and Dale.
Fun Fact: In the first Drake Bell Fairly Oddparents movie, Drake Bell plays a grown up Timmy Turner who’s only friends are 5th graders
@@IcyDiamond lmao that didn’t age well
@@jesterfromthecave6691 it does, just backwards
Who Framed Rodger rabbit is still the best Crossover movie ever...Which is kind of sad when you think about it especially how much thing's have evolved with technology and story telling😔
To be fair, this movie had a small budget. It might've had a bigger one if it was going to theaters.
Technology: yes.
Storytelling: no.
@@silverscorpio24 Yesh what happend 😔
Atleast Who Framed Roger Rabbit" had tasteful comedy and warmth to it. Despite the jokes on cartoon being a dangerous force of nature for humans. Since the whole joke on cartoons surviving stuff that would normally kill humans was funny. Whereas Rescue Rangers 2022 was just lame adult humour put unto childrens cartoon characters all the time.
A good fammade sequel: Roger and a new detective now own Valiant detective agency, the film not only properly animates its characters, but is shot alike the Office (adding new innovation), the plot is about a corporate Giant (alike Zazlav) doing evil stuff to their workers- animated AND live action (maybe throw in the Dip or an evolution of it for digital ink).
Chip N' Dale is probably one of the movies of all time.
One of the worst movies of all time
@Joshua Munn Exactly.
Truly one of the movies ever released
truly a film that was released
A film that really does exist
Honestly, I think that the high pitched voices would just get grating. I think that saying that the squeaky voices being voice acting was a good way to explain why they didn’t have them.
Yeah I actually agree with that. That’s like… the one good direction choice
"God, these two cannot voice act!"
Yet later that year, John Mulaney killed it as Big Jack Horner.
“…mete…self-referential, and cool.” Translate into “We didn’t have an original idea so were hoping that Bait and switching the fans is going to cause outrage so people more will watch the movie.”
Painfully accurate
Best thing about this movie was 4chan furries freaking out and cursing Jews because a fly did it with a mouse. That was... a thing.
Edit: I'm glad you also talked about how much John Mulaney sucks, most overrated "comedian" of all time only liked by Tumblr weirdos.
4chan furries and Russians
@@IcyDiamond yeah idk why Russians in particular reacted so strongly
There’s like, two skits of his that I actually like. And that would be the “The One Thing You Can’t Replace”, and “The Salt and Pepper Diner.” Which aren’t funny because of how he delivers them, but just because the situations are decently funny. If anything the delivery detracts from it.
@@dopey473 Because in Russia, there’s a whole Gadget cult
The thing about John Mulaney is that yeah, he's got some funny material, but then it gets reposted to hell and back and whatever semblance of "funny" that happened to be in whatever joke he was telling is now run completely dry, because all Tumblr users know how to do is milk anything and everything of every last drop.
Like, I can't tell you how many times I've seen the Salt and Pepper Diner skit, except it's with fucking Hamilton characters or whatever they're obsessing over that week.
I will remind everyone that The Rise of Skywalker’s audience score was stuck at an 84% for months in end (in fact, it might still be stuck at that), proving that Disney can just make Rotten Tomatoes give them an 80-ish percentage score, even when no one f*cking likes the movie.
I have not seen one person compliment this movie, so it must be the mouse twisting the tomato’s arm, again.
Checked it, and only the verified ones are at 86, all audience puts it at 76.
Verified: 50k+ reviews
All: 100k+ reviews.
In conclusion, yeah lots of fake 5 star reviews for a shit movie.
I've seen lots of praise towards this movie for the humor and meta commentary. There's a TH-cam video that says the reception is divided.
@@matthewweatherford6566 Yeah it is, and it's noticeable.
5:21 The “Fat Cat Attack” segment is actually new animation, made specifically for the movie.
Seeing Just Stop not acting serious and deadpan the whole time is so funny to me.
why did disney think it was ok to mock bobby driscoll but then act surprised when everyone is mad at them
Very likely they forgot he existed and just used Peter Pan because it’s ironic since he’s supposed to be young forever and stuff.
What really pisses me off is that they couldn't even be bothered to animate most of the 2D characters in ACTUAL 2D. Disney proved they could still do it with Mary Poppins Returns, they just didn't WANT to for this movie because the focus was so clearly on harvesting as many IPs as possible.
Doesn't it take like, forever to hand draw an animation?
This movie would have fit Bonkers, another Disney Afternoon show, WAY better because his cartoon was already SET in a world where humans and cartoons coexisted and was already LOADED with Disney cameos. It's obvious Chip and Dale were used instead because of nostalgia but...The movie wasn't BUILT for them. Ignoring the faults and controversies, the movie feels like it was meant for Bonkers but Chip and Dale were plastered on the front because they'd sell more.
Also cus no one liked bonkers,even Warner Bros mocked it
@@redhood7650 When did WB mock it?
@@IcyDiamond it was a tiny toons joke I think
@@redhood7650 Oh ok thanks
@@redhood7650 Bonkers actually does have a fanbase & WB has always been mocking Disney, good or bad.
If there is a silver lining, it's that they didn't brand this as a Roger Rabbit movie.
I think that what separates this from Freiberg and Seltzer is that their "jokes" were far more raunchy and inappropriate, and the movies were aimed at teens and adults (Which may indicate that critics and audiences are going easy on the movie because "it's for kids").
Imagine coping a TH-camrs opinion because you think yours wouldn’t matter (it’s ok I don’t understand)
Still can’t believe they got away with including Sonic
Disney has so much money and influence that they can pay for anything that was ever copyrighted in history out of chump change. This is just them flexing the control they have over media and culture (and if anyone budges against them, they have enough lawyers and lawmakers in their pockets to make their lives miserable)
Notice how they called him "ugly sonic" and not "sonic"?? that's how they got away with it
Disney was able use him in Wreck-It-Ralph 1 and 2. Pretty sure they got the Blue Blur in their pocket at this point.
The movie just being "LOOK, A REFERENCE TO THAT ONE THING" is the laziest theme to make profit out of I've ever seen for a movie
4:05
Fun fact about this scene, that simpsons parody character was originally going to be graggle simpson but Matt Groening veto'd the idea when disney approached him about it because, in his words "According to all official sources, Graggle never went to school, this scene would not make sense."
Nothing makes sense about this movie
Neither will 75% of this movie.
(I think it’s more tbh)
I get what the film was trying to do it was try to capture that Deadpool/Roger rabbit levels of success with Easter eggs,meta humor, and crossovers but they forgot what made those movies so successful.and I feel that's what hurt the film
8:44 THANKS VIRGIL! You saved us from fly cringe
I am still confused af on how this movie, which is basically just Epic Movie done a bit better got an 82% on Rotten Tomatoes but Murder on the Orient Express, an actual competent and good film, got only a 61%. We live in a society 💀
Take review sites with a grain of salt, since some actual good movies can get review bombed to drop the rating, or people have poor judgment and taste. Same with a bad movie somehow having high reviews when you look at actual fans opinions that tell the truth.
Also rotten tomatoes is owned by Disney
Good point, Carl💀😆
I take Epic Movie over Rescue Rangers 2022.
The most upsetting part is that we’ve seen with films like Encanto that Modern Disney has the capacity to put heart into their films but they just don’t give a shit because it’ll make big bucks anyways
Edit: changed "make good films" to "put heart into their films" because apparently Encanto being good or not was the big kicker of my comment lmao
"Encanto"
"Good film"
Pick one
@@reddodeado what?
@@reddodeado you’re absolutely right, encanto was a shit film
@@reddodeado Bruh Encanto was the best Disney movie since Zootopia, which at that point had been like 5 years old. So whatever you’re smoking, I want some too.
@@amirgarcia547
It's called "not falling for some bare bones minority pandering/not having a minority fetish like Twitter does"
This video was so good it made me forget about how Dumbsville’s Twitter account got suspended again! 😁👍
george orwells 1984
This reply is random
I understand the Lego man’s logic
@@Dripflix2000 is it tho?
I am random
Now this review hits the nail on the head, but it sucks that this is now a showcase for John Mulaney and Andy Samberg’s voice acting talents. They really CAN act well when the directing and script is good, look at Into the Spider-Verse and Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs for example of how well they CAN do. But….this sure as hell doesn’t have a good director or script.
I have seen cloudy, that is a great film. So I do agree there! Need to see the Spiderverse film.
I don't really like cloudy but Andy samberd was great as the heretic skeksis in the dark crystal series.
Finally, one other animation reviewer with integrity. Thank you for tearing into this.
I'm just so goddamn sick of movies being "ironic' and "self-aware". Judging by this film's scores though, the rest of the world can't get enough of it.
I forgot which movie did this last time
But unfortunately, It will get more and more common
_Ironically,_ (lol) the whole "self awareness amirite" thing stems from a very childish mentality of being too embarrassed to just...enjoy things.
At 12:00 funnily enough there is a movie starring a guy who shot a guy irl and because he hated him, the film is obvs the assassin's perspective. I'm talking about Prince Yusupov making a movie titled "I killed Rasputin" and he himself is in it.
I'm genuinely thrilled that you included the "Third Act Misunderstanding" song!
Good Grief! The animation in this film makes "Out of Jimmy's Head" look like "Who Framed Roger Rabbit"! :/
19:27 Very valid point. This felt less like a Chip 'n' Dale movie and more like a bootleg sequel to "Who Framed Roger Rabbit". Honestly the plot of this film would have probably been better if instead of just Chip 'n' Dale they included the rest of the old Disney Afternoon line-up.
The only interesting thing in this movie was the mental breakdown of all the Gadget fanboys on 4chan
The fact that this decent but flawed adaption of a beloved TV show didn't mention the Russian Gadget Cult is a crime.
I feel sorry for them, look what Disney did to their prophet
Context?
@@skyjack1 Gadget has a weird cult in Russia that praises her like a God
*the what*
Last time I remember, Russia doesn't have Disney+ and it looks like they're not releasing this movie in theaters in countries that don't have Disney+. They apparently only do that for movies that were originally slated for theaters in the US and internationally and were completed before they changed that decision.
The peterpan thing is fucked up. Like they might as well have put a picture of his real life corpse and spat on it.
So I just watched Despicable Me 3 for the first time which also features a former child star who got let go because he got older and became a villain because of it which also made me remember the movie "Cats don't Dance" which also features a child star who's the villain.
Between those movies and Chip n' Dale-- and call me crazy-- I legitimately believe that Hollywood is well aware that they treat child stars like sh💩t and love making fun of them for it.
By the way, the villain from Cats don't Dance is supposedly inspired by Shirley Temple and while she was one of the few child stars that didn't end up crazy, she still endured a lot of messed up stuff.
Darla Dimple was based on Shirley Temple. Granted, she had a tough life after puberty, but Darla's characterization was based on an old joke about Shirley really being a surly dwarf pretending to be a sweet kid. They made that joke because they found her persona _too_ cute and therefore annoying. Also, the character was still a kid while the real person had long grown out of that persona, which she also hated, so I doubt she was very offended by it.
Gotta admire how easily entertained the internet is to be collectively together on the bad design of Sonic, then to act like it’s all good because they made him acknowledge he’s ugly.
And they act like just cause they use him at the end as a “undercover fbi” twist makes it any better. Like good job writers, you know how to please people who don’t know better.
For anyone interested, the metal song that Chip was listening to is Laid to Rest by Lamb of God.
Thank you!
I’m a huge metalhead!🤟
The only good part about this film!
@@calebpribyl5152 your welcome
12:05 this is a certified "I've got Murder on my Mind" moment
*This film Traumatized so much, it made go back to drinking alcohol.*
Welcome to the club. 🥃🥃🥃🥃🥃
🍺
7:49 I agree. You can't be hurt if you're in on the joe 😔👊
Who's Joe?
JOE MAMA
Every person who ever compared this movie to Roger Rabbit in a positive way needs to be strapped to a chair with their eyelids pried open, Clockwork Orange style, and forced to watch these two movies back to back for a *week,* just to get the point across. Then, they should be made to watch this one for a *month,* just to really set in how horrible it truly is.
Lol yeah even Space Jam 2 is better than Rescue Rangers.
Chip N Dale is one of the weirdest movies I have ever seen and I really don’t understand all the high praise surrounding this movie aside from Disney bias (because let’s be honest if this was from another studio critics would’ve have hated it)
Apparently, the praise is mainly towards the self referential/meta humor about animation and today's film industry.
I noticed during my high-school years that a lot of criticisms directed toward non-Disney movies apply just as well to Disney movies, and it’s sad to see that that bias remains today even as people have generally become more aware of how shit the company is.
I cannot get over the rant about Gadget and Zipper's kids transitioning into a Vergil Status.
my humor is so broken that when i heard "You can't hurt my feelings if I'm in on the joke!" made me burst out laughing (i think i have a problem)
18:13 While the 1st Winnie the Pooh is in the Public Domain, the work that introduces Tigger called _The House at Pooh Corner_ is still copyrighted, as it was released in 1928. Also, Disney’s design of Pooh Bear is still Trademarked.
I genuinely just don’t care about this movie because of how bad it is but I’m really kinda upset Disney has got to a point to make the main villain the old Peter Pan knowing probably full well what they were doing it and oh don’t get me started on sonic and gadget- it’s just bazaar to me
Imagine coping a TH-camrs opinion because you think yours wouldn’t matter (it’s ok I don’t understand)
@@laddenx What the hell are you talking about?
@@JayRedGear link on the pfp fron the legend of Zelda goofy DC super hero girl 💀💀💀💀💀💀super man is dodo enough at least put batgirl
To be fair, there's alot of movies that called off tragic events/deaths, like the 9/11 movie that was based of a horrible event that killed thousands of people(obviously). But I'm probably wrong lmao. Just my opinion.
13:23
The worst character on South Park when they made him the main character the show died. OMG they killed South Park you bastards