I love how these videos are #triggering Ruckmanites. Also, they keep saying all you are doing is following a man, when you use tons of Scripture and never mention a man's teachings. (Except to pick it apart with Scripture- like Clarence Larkin's heretical beliefs) I do believe they are projecting.
Amen preacher, I'm so thankful for this posting. Awesome point about the dispensing of the gospel. Abel also knew about sacrifice though the law was not written yet, which is also more importantly a picture of Christ. I'm very grateful for the unwavering stance you have taken. I need to be more like that in my life. God bless.
@@willywonkalucretia I'm saying how did Abel trust Christ when Christ wasn't revealed and did not shed his blood in the OT? Remember, it is a *sin* to add to God's word (Prov 30:5-6 KJV)
J RAN 85 I believe Abel was saved by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus. His may not have been revealed, however there was a seed spoken of to his mother, I cannot see a reason why she would not tell her sons. I can't strive long about this issue, but there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. The entire word of God is about Jesus. Jesus is the Word and he was the word before he became flesh.
I wonder why Peter didn't know that initially. Why did God have to reveal something to Peter in Acts 10 that was supposedly "already know" in the OT 🤷♂️
They gave witness to it but had no idea what they were prophesying about. “Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow. Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.” 1 Peter 1:10-12 KJV
Smh... I’m glad I switched to accept the literal dispensations of the Bible. I no longer have to Christianize prophecy. There are multiple Gospels to different ages, “Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand” is not the same Gospel of Grace, and that is a different Gospel than the Everlasting Gospel at the end-time. When Jesus came to the earth, he came to save Israel... after they rejected him God put a temporary blindness on them and turned to make the Church thru the disciples especially Peter and Paul. How is this not obvious?
Matthew Martin You are 100% right. The *_Everlasting Gospel_* will go to all nations... This Gospel is a commandment to worship Jehovah, Have faith in Jesus and to NOT worship the beast or his image. It’s also a message to come out of Babylon. (Revelation 14:7-9 commonly referred to ass the Three Angels Messages) This is another reason why they obey the commandments of God AND have faith in Jesus. A mix of Faith + Law that is currently not in effect in the Gospel of Grace. This is why 7th Day Adventists screw up the current Gospel of Faith because they do not divide correctly. -Have a blessed day
Like how He hardened the Pharaoh's heart? The scripture clearly states that he called Israel to be a light to the Gentiles. Remember, before any Jew existed, He called Abraham out of the world to be set apart for Him and to be a witness to the surrounding nations. In the Old Testament, if a Gentile wanted to serve the God of Israel, he was grafted in by being circumcised and his circumcision was a sign of the righteousness he obtained while still uncircumcised. The blindness of Israel is no different than the general blindness of the world to the gospel. All of the Gentile nations are not saved nor do they believe. Are they not also so blinded? I know many individual Jews who are not blinded and so accept the Gospel of salvation in the same way as any gentile does. The Lydian women from Thyatira is said to have become open to the gospel, which means she was closed at some point prior to that awakening. Was she not open when she had sight or was she closed while she could still not see? If she was blind, what opened her eyes so that she could see, the Gospel or the Lord directly? The occasion that allowed her eyes to be opened is the same opportunity available to all who call upon the name of the LORD. You are trying to understand the Bible too much with your mind rather than with the guidance of the Holy Spirit. You can know the scriptures and still, miss the message of its pages. The Devil works by focusing on the mind, whereby God speaks directly to a man's spirit. Also, how is the gospel of grace not the same as the message to "Repent for the kingdom of God is at hand"? How can a man's repentance be accepted any other way than by grace? It's by grace that we are saved by faith and if not the kingdom of God is not at hand for such men. When Jesus came to earth, HE CAME to save Israel? This is a ridiculous simplification of Jesus' intended purpose. It's like saying that the meaning of the verse, " I did not COME to abolish the law..." means to primarily emphasize that the Lord's purpose for COMING was to preserve the law when clearly the meaning of "purpose" was satisfied by His coming and is meant to convey that he came to fulfill it and by fulfilling the law he did not abolish it but rather He Established it, which was His primary reason for COMING. In a similar sense, Jesus came to save Israel and not to reject the gentiles. The saving of the gentiles was occasioned by his coming to save the Jews and as the scriptures teach "To the Jew first and EQUALLY (yes, that's the actual Greek word used -- equally, not exclusively) to the Greek, Jesus' plan was always to save WORLD, not only the Jews but also the non-Jews. To posit that, except by some contingent circumstances of their rejection of His Messiahship, Jesus never intended to save the gentiles, that his COMING was ONLY for the JEWS is unscriptural. If you agree that his COMING was anticipated to save JEW and GENTILE alike, then what is your point in emphasizing the word COME as though it is being used in the sense of exclusiveness, pending some contingency of rejection by the JEWS?
The Gospel Command is to repent and believe. “Repent” meaning to “turn from unbelief to belief”. The Gospel of the Kingdom & the Gospel of Grace are the SAME gospel. Just two sides of the SAME coin.
@@Benn61 Dan 9:24 "Seventy weeks are determined For your people and for your holy city, To finish the transgression, To make an end of sins, To make reconciliation for iniquity, To bring in everlasting righteousness, To seal up vision and prophecy, And to anoint the Most Holy. Heb 10:16 "THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THEM AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS INTO THEIR HEARTS, AND IN THEIR MINDS I WILL WRITE THEM," Heb 10:17 then He adds, "THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE." (from the promise of the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31:31-34) Heb 10:18 Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin. Act 10:38 how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him. .
Thank you so much for exposing this false and dangerous doctrine. I'm not sure ppl can be saved if they are following or believe in multiple gospels or a doctrine of men.
Progressively it dropped water baptism and other things because it was progressively revealed to Paul the dispensation of the grace of god in its fullness in eph3:1-21 ! Grace was progressively being dispensed in its different times with each gospel ! Noah found favor grace in the eyes of god before he built the boat !! That was good news !
Amen Pastor! But can you explain when disciples was saved? Because dispensationalist use passages where apostles can not understand death,burial, resurrection. Thank you!
I just think the GOSPEL is so simple! It is the unfaithful people that make it hard! And they want to argue a point that doesn't need to be argued! FAITH ALONE PEOPLE---THAT'S IT!!!
Sorry, J RAN 85, but those animal sacrifices DID NOT take away their sin, those sacrifices simply were a shadow (or picture) of the ultimate sacrifice Who was yet to come (Jesus). The animal sacrifices were done in REMEMBRANCE of sin, and were simply an illustration to point folks to the Messiah's sacrifice. Just like the LAW, it was not given to make men perfect, but rather to show them they COULD NOT KEEP THE LAW and were in need of a perfect Saviour. "Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith." "For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect. For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins. But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins."
It is the ultimate fulfillment of Israel found in Matthew 1:1. It is the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24. It is found in John 1:1, and John 1:14. The Bible is a book about Jesus Christ. He is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15. He is the seed of Abraham promised in Genesis 12:3, as confirmed by Paul in Galatians 3:16. He revealed that the whole Old Testament is about Him in Luke 24:25-27. Watch the TH-cam videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay, and "The Prophecy of Daniel 9" by Dr. Kelly Varner. .
In Matthew 4:17, you get the content of Jesus’ preaching (“Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”) and we’re told in Matthew 4:23 that Jesus went about preaching the gospel of the kingdom. There is NO mention of the death, burial, and resurrection in Matthew 4. The content of the Lord’s message concerned His coming kingdom of heaven (which is his earthly, literal, physical kingdom - only mentioned in Matthew). Additionally, explain to me WHY the disciples responded the way they did at the mention (by the Lord Himself) of His death, burial, and resurrection in Mark 8:31-33 and 9:31-32. According to your “doctrine” they should’ve been awaiting and joyful at the mention of this. The old preacher was right when he said, “If a man is not a dispensationalist, he is mentally handicapped and dangerous."
Warrior Mindset Except there are multiple scriptures in the Old Testament proving it. They didn't understand it fully but it doesn't mean they didn't believe in it. It's dispensationalists that are mentally handicapped and dangerous.
Warrior Mindset No he doesn't!! The verse just simply says God revealed more of the gospel to Paul. Did you not see how Pastor McMurtry proved that in this video. There are scores of scriptures to debunk this nonsense of multiple gospels yet you guys completely ignore them.
David Robinson Please read the verses because they don’t say what you want them to say. Also take a hard look at Romans 16:25-26. Galatians 1:11-12 [11] But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. [12] For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it , but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
Warrior Mindset I believe Romans 16:25-26 as a matter of fact I have those two verses memorized. Non-dispensationalists don't deny at all that God revealed more of his plans over time. No one denies that. But that doesn't change the fact that they had the death, burial, and resurrection. Pastor McMurtry and Anderson both acknowledge that we as New Testament saints know more than the Old Testament. Can you please give an answer to Isaiah 53:8-10 and where it's quoted in Acts 8:30-35.
Brother, I'm sure you've already thought of this one. In Galatians 2:14, when Paul rebuked Peter because he was not walking according to the truth of the gospel, Peter did not tell him: mind your own business, you have a gospel for the Gentiles, I have the one for the Jews. It was according to the Gospel, not the GospelS ... So the same Gospel was good for both men. No wonder, since there is only one gospel. Thank you and God Bless.
Medical indications comcerning pregnancy are NOT DISPENSATIONS. Here you are doing a similar shell game as you performed with the word "divide" in 2Tim.2:15. You changed it to "give".
The gospel is the gospel of the kingdom! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah died for his people! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Matt 24 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
Where does paul preach born again ? He don’t but he draws out the new creation! Awe so progressive revelation is of upmost importance because they get clear with time! How about the gospel of grace with Paul was not always the same
@@briannazq7596 It's the teaching that there are more than one Gospel which actually Paul condemned in Galatians. There is only one Gospel and there are many perversions of the Gospel. Those who teach dispensational salvation teach they were saved by faith and works in the Old Testament and that they will be saved by faith and works in the Tribulation. They believe we are only saved by grace without works in this dispensation. Not all dispensationalists believe this, but many of it's main teachers including Clarence Larkin (who all dispensationalists follow) believed this heresy.
@@GiveMeLibertyBaptist 𝐏𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑 & 𝐏𝐀𝐔𝐋 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐖𝐎 𝐃𝐈𝐅𝐅𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐆𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐋𝐒 📖 ⚔️ The 12 apostles of Israel did not preach the same message that was preached by Christ’s chosen vessel for the Gentiles (Paul). Two contradictory salvation messages cannot both be written to the same group of people. God is not the author of confusion. 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Chosen by Christ in the flesh to be apostles for Israel Paul - Chosen by the risen, ascended Christ from heaven to be the apostle for the Gentiles (Acts 9:15-16). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Wrote to the 12 tribes of Israel (James 1:1, 1 Peter 1:1). Paul - Wrote to the body of Christ (Romans 12:5, 1 Corinthians 12:12-13,27). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Given the gospel of the circumcision (Galatians 2:7-9). Paul - Given the gospel of the uncircumcision (Galatians 2:7-9). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Did not go on a mission to the Gentile nations Paul - Journeyed through the Gentile nations with the gospel of God’s grace, which is for salvation unto the ends of the earth (Acts 13:46-48). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Wrote to a holy nation and kingdom of priests (1 Peter 2:9, Revelation 1:6). Paul - Never mentioned a holy nation / kingdom of priests. 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Preached future forgiveness of sins, and a future promise of salvation for Israel (Acts 3:19). Paul - Preached salvation and forgiveness of sins as a present possession for the body of Christ (Colossians 2:13, 2 Timothy 1:8-9, Titus 3:4-5). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Will sit upon 12 thrones judging 12 tribes of Israel in future earthly kingdom (Matthew 19:28). Paul - Will not sit upon a throne judging 12 tribes of Israel in future earthly kingdom - has eternal inheritance in God’s heavenly kingdom (2 Timothy 4:18). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Will have their 12 names written on the 12 foundations of the wall of the new Jerusalem (Revelation 21:14). Paul - Will not have his name written on the foundation of the wall in new Jerusalem. 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Preached Christ according to fulfillment of prophecy (Acts 3:19-25). Paul - Preached Christ according to the revelation of the mystery (Romans 16:25). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Preached works of righteousness as part of salvation (Acts 10:34-35, James 2:24, 1 John 3:7). Paul - Preached that salvation is not of works, but by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9, Titus 3:4-5). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Operated according to the doctrine of Christ from his earthly ministry (Hebrews 6:1, 2 John 1:9). Paul - Operated according to the doctrine he was given via the revelation of the mystery from risen and ascended Christ (1 Timothy 1:3, 2 Timothy 3:10). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 - Continued to keep the law of Moses after the cross (Acts 21:17-21). Paul - Preached that those who believe the gospel of God’s grace are not under the law, but under grace (Romans 6:14, Galatians 5:18). 🔥📖🔥📖🔥 The 12 apostles were sent with a salvation message according to the law and prophecy, according to Israel’s earthly kingdom plan of salvation. Paul was separated unto a different mission (Acts 13:2) according to the revelation of the mystery and the dispensation of grace for God’s heavenly plan of salvation for the body of Christ. We must rightly divide and separate the scriptures for these two unique and different plans of salvation otherwise we end up with a mixed up message of contradictions and confusion. 📖 ⚔️
@@GiveMeLibertyBaptist I can say that there is ONE GOSPEL that saves today, but which one is it? Is it the Gospel of the Kingdom to Israel.🌎 (Matthew 3:2, 4:7, 10:7 Acts 3:19-21)? Or the Gospel of the Grace of God revealed later to Paul the Apostle in Acts 20:24, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)? 🕊
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) 10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
Every non-dispensationalist habitually sins by *adding* to God's word (Prov 30:5-6 KJV). They can't help it. It's mandatory to promote such idiotic false doctrine
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it. Watch the TH-cam videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay, and "The Prophecy of Daniel 9" by Dr. Kelly Varner. .
It’s crazy to me how the dispy’s come up with this. It’s simple, Adam saw Abel’s body corrupt and not too mention was ashamed in the garden through transgression and needed a redeemer. Gen 4 we see those things result in calling upon the name of the Lord through faith and the whole Bible fits together line upon line. Man has always called on God in faith in order to escape the wrath and to be given a new glorified body to see God in their new flesh as Job described in 19:25-27.. I hope people who are deceived by the dispy’s are starting to catch onto their motives of trying to make merchandise of them. Let’s be honest can anyone understand dispy’s doctrine without the charts and books and books upon books filled with scofield Larkin and Darby’s feigned speech and fair words? I hope if you are wat hung this video you will diligently seek God and listen to Pastor McMurtry because he is using Bible not Darby
🤔Hmmm...can you understand there's is no gospel of Jesus Christ death, burial, and ressurection *before* Jesus Christ actually died, was buried, and resurrected?
WRONG, J RAN 85. Acts 2:24-32---- "Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption." David knew all about the death, burial & resurrection of Christ and SPOKE about it. Read the above verse. And the sacrifice of Jesus Christ was finished in God's eyes from the foundation of the world. "For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world." You keep trying to put God in a bottle of time, putting limitations on God. God lives outside of time, in eternity. "Yea, they turned back and tempted God, and limited the Holy One of Israel."
@@JackHyles WRONG JACKIE. It's AMAZING that non-dispensationalist cannot discern prophecies from revelations 🤦♂️ The death, burial, and ressurection was PROPHESIED in the OT but it was not REVEALED. Jesus says this SEVERAL TIMES!! PAY ATTENTION: Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the *prophets* concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on: And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again. *And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.* Luke 18:31-34 KJV IT WASN'T REVEALED. DAVID prophesied, not revealed. David was still *literally* sacrificing animals for sins before he died for crying out loud 😂 Non-dispensationalist love ignorance almost as much a Atheist
Non-dispensationalist are mentally ill: And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, *what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?* And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: *but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.* He saith unto him, Which? *Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.* Matt 19:16-19 KJV 😱 O NO NON-DISPENSATIONALIST! WHAT GOSPEL WAS JESUS PREACHING??! IT CERTAINLY WASN'T HIS DEATH, BURIAL, AND RESSURECTION!!
Duh. This whole chapter was to show the rich young ruler that HE HAD NOT KEPT THE COMMANDMENTS. None of us have. The rich young ruler thought he had, and he had not. He didn't love the Lord with his whole heart and soul, he loved riches more. Do you really think Jesus was telling him to keep the law to obtain salvation? He was showing him how HE HADN'T...BECAUSE NONE OF HAVE. It's never been about keeping the law. It's always been one gospel- by grace through faith. If you really think this passage was about keeping the law for salvation, you have no idea what salvation is.
@@CassieRaeMcMurtry Great! So show me in the chapter where Jesus says "ETERNAL LIFE IS GAINED BY BELIEVING MY DEATH BURIAL AND RESSURECTION" I'll wait...
@@youngnixx88788 Are you seriously saying you believe Jesus was telling him salvation is obtained by keeping the law??!!! It doesn't need to be in that chapter. It's in the whole New Testament. In fact, John is all about how to obtain salvation- and that is by BELIEVING ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. If you think you can be saved by keeping the law, you need to go read John, get saved, come back, and we can continue our discussion. Unbelievable.
@@CassieRaeMcMurtry Im simply quoting the scripture. I didn't say anything regarding what I believe. But YOU non-dispensationalist are *sinning* by *adding* to Gods words (Prov 30:5-6 KJV) If the gospel was "ALWAYS AND ONLY THE DEATH, BURIAL, AND RESSURECTION OF JESUS CHRIST", THEN BIBLICALLY EXPLAIN WHY JESUS TOLD THE YOUNG MAN IF HE WANTS ETERNAL LIFE, KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS
![fellow fellow - พรุ่งนี้ไม่มีใครรู้ feat. INK WARUNTORN [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QP6JyjYx_W0/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how these videos are #triggering Ruckmanites. Also, they keep saying all you are doing is following a man, when you use tons of Scripture and never mention a man's teachings. (Except to pick it apart with Scripture- like Clarence Larkin's heretical beliefs) I do believe they are projecting.
Amen preacher, I'm so thankful for this posting. Awesome point about the dispensing of the gospel. Abel also knew about sacrifice though the law was not written yet, which is also more importantly a picture of Christ. I'm very grateful for the unwavering stance you have taken. I need to be more like that in my life. God bless.
Are you claiming Abel was trusting Christ?
J RAN 85 are you saying Jesus isn't his savior? By the way Jesus called Abel a prophet.
@@willywonkalucretia
I'm saying how did Abel trust Christ when Christ wasn't revealed and did not shed his blood in the OT?
Remember, it is a *sin* to add to God's word (Prov 30:5-6 KJV)
J RAN 85 I believe Abel was saved by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus. His may not have been revealed, however there was a seed spoken of to his mother, I cannot see a reason why she would not tell her sons. I can't strive long about this issue, but there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. The entire word of God is about Jesus. Jesus is the Word and he was the word before he became flesh.
Great point, at the time of the road to Emmaus the Epistles of Paul didn't exist, yet Jesus explained to them the death burial and resurrection.
To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. ACTS 10:43 KJV
I wonder why Peter didn't know that initially. Why did God have to reveal something to Peter in Acts 10 that was supposedly "already know" in the OT 🤷♂️
They gave witness to it but had no idea what they were prophesying about.
“Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow. Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.”
1 Peter 1:10-12 KJV
Smh... I’m glad I switched to accept the literal dispensations of the Bible. I no longer have to Christianize prophecy.
There are multiple Gospels to different ages, “Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand” is not the same Gospel of Grace, and that is a different Gospel than the Everlasting Gospel at the end-time.
When Jesus came to the earth, he came to save Israel... after they rejected him God put a temporary blindness on them and turned to make the Church thru the disciples especially Peter and Paul. How is this not obvious?
Matthew Martin You are 100% right. The *_Everlasting Gospel_* will go to all nations...
This Gospel is a commandment to worship Jehovah, Have faith in Jesus and to NOT worship the beast or his image. It’s also a message to come out of Babylon. (Revelation 14:7-9 commonly referred to ass the Three Angels Messages)
This is another reason why they obey the commandments of God AND have faith in Jesus. A mix of Faith + Law that is currently not in effect in the Gospel of Grace. This is why 7th Day Adventists screw up the current Gospel of Faith because they do not divide correctly.
-Have a blessed day
@Matthew Martin
It does go to ALL NATIONS in the book of Revelation
Matthew Martin you’re right it’s the same gospel as John the Baptist with a few more warnings added.
Like how He hardened the Pharaoh's heart? The scripture clearly states that he called Israel to be a light to the Gentiles. Remember, before any Jew existed, He called Abraham out of the world to be set apart for Him and to be a witness to the surrounding nations. In the Old Testament, if a Gentile wanted to serve the God of Israel, he was grafted in by being circumcised and his circumcision was a sign of the righteousness he obtained while still uncircumcised. The blindness of Israel is no different than the general blindness of the world to the gospel. All of the Gentile nations are not saved nor do they believe. Are they not also so blinded? I know many individual Jews who are not blinded and so accept the Gospel of salvation in the same way as any gentile does. The Lydian women from Thyatira is said to have become open to the gospel, which means she was closed at some point prior to that awakening. Was she not open when she had sight or was she closed while she could still not see? If she was blind, what opened her eyes so that she could see, the Gospel or the Lord directly? The occasion that allowed her eyes to be opened is the same opportunity available to all who call upon the name of the LORD. You are trying to understand the Bible too much with your mind rather than with the guidance of the Holy Spirit. You can know the scriptures and still, miss the message of its pages. The Devil works by focusing on the mind, whereby God speaks directly to a man's spirit.
Also, how is the gospel of grace not the same as the message to "Repent for the kingdom of God is at hand"? How can a man's repentance be accepted any other way than by grace? It's by grace that we are saved by faith and if not the kingdom of God is not at hand for such men.
When Jesus came to earth, HE CAME to save Israel? This is a ridiculous simplification of Jesus' intended purpose. It's like saying that the meaning of the verse, " I did not COME to abolish the law..." means to primarily emphasize that the Lord's purpose for COMING was to preserve the law when clearly the meaning of "purpose" was satisfied by His coming and is meant to convey that he came to fulfill it and by fulfilling the law he did not abolish it but rather He Established it, which was His primary reason for COMING. In a similar sense, Jesus came to save Israel and not to reject the gentiles. The saving of the gentiles was occasioned by his coming to save the Jews and as the scriptures teach "To the Jew first and EQUALLY (yes, that's the actual Greek word used -- equally, not exclusively) to the Greek, Jesus' plan was always to save WORLD, not only the Jews but also the non-Jews. To posit that, except by some contingent circumstances of their rejection of His Messiahship, Jesus never intended to save the gentiles, that his COMING was ONLY for the JEWS is unscriptural. If you agree that his COMING was anticipated to save JEW and GENTILE alike, then what is your point in emphasizing the word COME as though it is being used in the sense of exclusiveness, pending some contingency of rejection by the JEWS?
The Gospel Command is to repent and believe. “Repent” meaning to “turn from unbelief to belief”.
The Gospel of the Kingdom & the Gospel of Grace are the SAME gospel. Just two sides of the SAME coin.
Great job exposing these heretics!
Pastor, how do you interpret OT Prophecy, is it meant to be taken literally or figuratively?
Which prophecy?
@@GiveMeLibertyBaptist Try Zechariah 14
or Daniel 9:24 ->
@@Benn61
Dan 9:24 "Seventy weeks are determined For your people and for your holy city, To finish the transgression, To make an end of sins, To make reconciliation for iniquity, To bring in everlasting righteousness, To seal up vision and prophecy, And to anoint the Most Holy.
Heb 10:16 "THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THEM AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS INTO THEIR HEARTS, AND IN THEIR MINDS I WILL WRITE THEM,"
Heb 10:17 then He adds, "THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE." (from the promise of the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31:31-34)
Heb 10:18 Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin.
Act 10:38 how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him.
.
Thank you so much for exposing this false and dangerous doctrine. I'm not sure ppl can be saved if they are following or believe in multiple gospels or a doctrine of men.
I love this series!
Progressively it dropped water baptism and other things because it was progressively revealed to Paul the dispensation of the grace of god in its fullness in eph3:1-21 ! Grace was progressively being dispensed in its different times with each gospel ! Noah found favor grace in the eyes of god before he built the boat !! That was good news !
Water baptism never had a part in salvation endofhistory.info
Amen Pastor!
But can you explain when disciples was saved? Because dispensationalist use passages where apostles can not understand death,burial, resurrection. Thank you!
I just think the GOSPEL is so simple! It is the unfaithful people that make it hard! And they want to argue a point that doesn't need to be argued! FAITH ALONE PEOPLE---THAT'S IT!!!
Why where they *literally* sacrificing animals if it was always "FAITH ALONE" ??
Sorry, J RAN 85, but those animal sacrifices DID NOT take away their sin, those sacrifices simply were a shadow (or picture) of the ultimate sacrifice Who was yet to come (Jesus). The animal sacrifices were done in REMEMBRANCE of sin, and were simply an illustration to point folks to the Messiah's sacrifice. Just like the LAW, it was not given to make men perfect, but rather to show them they COULD NOT KEEP THE LAW and were in need of a perfect Saviour.
"Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith." "For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect. For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins. But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins."
I’d like to pose a question to all of the non-dispensationalists on this thread: What is the main theme of the Bible?
It is the ultimate fulfillment of Israel found in Matthew 1:1.
It is the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24.
It is found in John 1:1, and John 1:14.
The Bible is a book about Jesus Christ.
He is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15.
He is the seed of Abraham promised in Genesis 12:3, as confirmed by Paul in Galatians 3:16.
He revealed that the whole Old Testament is about Him in Luke 24:25-27.
Watch the TH-cam videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay, and "The Prophecy of Daniel 9" by Dr. Kelly Varner.
.
Jesus
In Matthew 4:17, you get the content of Jesus’ preaching (“Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”) and we’re told in Matthew 4:23 that Jesus went about preaching the gospel of the kingdom. There is NO mention of the death, burial, and resurrection in Matthew 4. The content of the Lord’s message concerned His coming kingdom of heaven (which is his earthly, literal, physical kingdom - only mentioned in Matthew).
Additionally, explain to me WHY the disciples responded the way they did at the mention (by the Lord Himself) of His death, burial, and resurrection in Mark 8:31-33 and 9:31-32. According to your “doctrine” they should’ve been awaiting and joyful at the mention of this. The old preacher was right when he said, “If a man is not a dispensationalist, he is mentally handicapped and dangerous."
Warrior Mindset Except there are multiple scriptures in the Old Testament proving it. They didn't understand it fully but it doesn't mean they didn't believe in it. It's dispensationalists that are mentally handicapped and dangerous.
David Robinson Paul contradicts you in Galatians 1:11-12
Warrior Mindset No he doesn't!! The verse just simply says God revealed more of the gospel to Paul. Did you not see how Pastor McMurtry proved that in this video. There are scores of scriptures to debunk this nonsense of multiple gospels yet you guys completely ignore them.
David Robinson Please read the verses because they don’t say what you want them to say. Also take a hard look at Romans 16:25-26.
Galatians 1:11-12
[11] But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. [12] For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it , but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
Warrior Mindset I believe Romans 16:25-26 as a matter of fact I have those two verses memorized. Non-dispensationalists don't deny at all that God revealed more of his plans over time. No one denies that. But that doesn't change the fact that they had the death, burial, and resurrection. Pastor McMurtry and Anderson both acknowledge that we as New Testament saints know more than the Old Testament. Can you please give an answer to Isaiah 53:8-10 and where it's quoted in Acts 8:30-35.
Brother, I'm sure you've already thought of this one. In Galatians 2:14, when Paul rebuked Peter because he was not walking according to the truth of the gospel, Peter did not tell him: mind your own business, you have a gospel for the Gentiles, I have the one for the Jews.
It was according to the Gospel, not the GospelS ... So the same Gospel was good for both men. No wonder, since there is only one gospel. Thank you and God Bless.
Medical indications comcerning pregnancy are NOT DISPENSATIONS. Here you are doing a similar shell game as you performed with the word "divide" in 2Tim.2:15. You changed it to "give".
1800-1900 gnostic heresy
The gospel is the gospel of the kingdom!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah died for his people! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Matt 24
14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
Where does paul preach born again ? He don’t but he draws out the new creation! Awe so progressive revelation is of upmost importance because they get clear with time! How about the gospel of grace with Paul was not always the same
You can't spell. You can't punctuate. Your grammar is terrible but are going to teach us about the Bible?
Thank you for these videos, I was in a church that taught that there were multiple gospels for a long time.
Isreal the little flock is the nation that produced fruit
This is the worst dispensationalist teaching of them all.
When you make a judgement that people are going to hell if they believe in dispensationalism, you've lost all credibility in my opinion.
I agree. A lot of saved people believe in dispensationalism and reject dispensational salvation. Those people are definitely saved.
@@GiveMeLibertyBaptist Please define dispensationalist salvation.
@@briannazq7596 It's the teaching that there are more than one Gospel which actually Paul condemned in Galatians. There is only one Gospel and there are many perversions of the Gospel. Those who teach dispensational salvation teach they were saved by faith and works in the Old Testament and that they will be saved by faith and works in the Tribulation. They believe we are only saved by grace without works in this dispensation. Not all dispensationalists believe this, but many of it's main teachers including Clarence Larkin (who all dispensationalists follow) believed this heresy.
@@GiveMeLibertyBaptist
𝐏𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑 & 𝐏𝐀𝐔𝐋 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐖𝐎 𝐃𝐈𝐅𝐅𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐆𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐋𝐒 📖 ⚔️
The 12 apostles of Israel did not preach the same message that was preached by Christ’s chosen vessel for the Gentiles (Paul).
Two contradictory salvation messages cannot both be written to the same group of people. God is not the author of confusion.
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Chosen by Christ in the flesh to be apostles for Israel
Paul - Chosen by the risen, ascended Christ from heaven to be the apostle for the Gentiles (Acts 9:15-16).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Wrote to the 12 tribes of Israel (James 1:1, 1 Peter 1:1).
Paul - Wrote to the body of Christ (Romans 12:5, 1 Corinthians 12:12-13,27).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Given the gospel of the circumcision (Galatians 2:7-9).
Paul - Given the gospel of the uncircumcision (Galatians 2:7-9).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Did not go on a mission to the Gentile nations
Paul - Journeyed through the Gentile nations with the gospel of God’s grace, which is for salvation unto the ends of the earth (Acts 13:46-48).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Wrote to a holy nation and kingdom of priests (1 Peter 2:9, Revelation 1:6).
Paul - Never mentioned a holy nation / kingdom of priests.
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Preached future forgiveness of sins, and a future promise of salvation for Israel (Acts 3:19).
Paul - Preached salvation and forgiveness of sins as a present possession for the body of Christ (Colossians 2:13, 2 Timothy 1:8-9, Titus 3:4-5).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Will sit upon 12 thrones judging 12 tribes of Israel in future earthly kingdom (Matthew 19:28).
Paul - Will not sit upon a throne judging 12 tribes of Israel in future earthly kingdom - has eternal inheritance in God’s heavenly kingdom (2 Timothy 4:18).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Will have their 12 names written on the 12 foundations of the wall of the new Jerusalem (Revelation 21:14).
Paul - Will not have his name written on the foundation of the wall in new Jerusalem.
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Preached Christ according to fulfillment of prophecy (Acts 3:19-25).
Paul - Preached Christ according to the revelation of the mystery (Romans 16:25).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Preached works of righteousness as part of salvation (Acts 10:34-35, James 2:24, 1 John 3:7).
Paul - Preached that salvation is not of works, but by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9, Titus 3:4-5).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Operated according to the doctrine of Christ from his earthly ministry (Hebrews 6:1, 2 John 1:9).
Paul - Operated according to the doctrine he was given via the revelation of the mystery from risen and ascended Christ (1 Timothy 1:3, 2 Timothy 3:10).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 - Continued to keep the law of Moses after the cross (Acts 21:17-21).
Paul - Preached that those who believe the gospel of God’s grace are not under the law, but under grace (Romans 6:14, Galatians 5:18).
🔥📖🔥📖🔥
The 12 apostles were sent with a salvation message according to the law and prophecy, according to Israel’s earthly kingdom plan of salvation.
Paul was separated unto a different mission (Acts 13:2) according to the revelation of the mystery and the dispensation of grace for God’s heavenly plan of salvation for the body of Christ.
We must rightly divide and separate the scriptures for these two unique and different plans of salvation otherwise we end up with a mixed up message of contradictions and confusion. 📖 ⚔️
@@GiveMeLibertyBaptist I can say that there is ONE GOSPEL that saves today, but which one is it?
Is it the Gospel of the Kingdom to Israel.🌎 (Matthew 3:2, 4:7, 10:7 Acts 3:19-21)?
Or the Gospel of the Grace of God revealed later to Paul the Apostle in Acts 20:24, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)? 🕊
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants?
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9)
10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
Every non-dispensationalist habitually sins by *adding* to God's word (Prov 30:5-6 KJV). They can't help it. It's mandatory to promote such idiotic false doctrine
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
Watch the TH-cam videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay, and "The Prophecy of Daniel 9" by Dr. Kelly Varner.
.
You follow an occultists called John Darby, you have the ''new'' chicken on a stick ''non gospel'' remember--if it's new it's more than likely untrue!
It’s crazy to me how the dispy’s come up with this. It’s simple, Adam saw Abel’s body corrupt and not too mention was ashamed in the garden through transgression and needed a redeemer. Gen 4 we see those things result in calling upon the name of the Lord through faith and the whole Bible fits together line upon line. Man has always called on God in faith in order to escape the wrath and to be given a new glorified body to see God in their new flesh as Job described in 19:25-27.. I hope people who are deceived by the dispy’s are starting to catch onto their motives of trying to make merchandise of them. Let’s be honest can anyone understand dispy’s doctrine without the charts and books and books upon books filled with scofield Larkin and Darby’s feigned speech and fair words? I hope if you are wat hung this video you will diligently seek God and listen to Pastor McMurtry because he is using Bible not Darby
🤔Hmmm...can you understand there's is no gospel of Jesus Christ death, burial, and ressurection *before* Jesus Christ actually died, was buried, and resurrected?
WRONG, J RAN 85. Acts 2:24-32---- "Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption."
David knew all about the death, burial & resurrection of Christ and SPOKE about it. Read the above verse.
And the sacrifice of Jesus Christ was finished in God's eyes from the foundation of the world. "For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world." You keep trying to put God in a bottle of time, putting limitations on God. God lives outside of time, in eternity. "Yea, they turned back and tempted God, and limited the Holy One of Israel."
@@JackHyles
WRONG JACKIE. It's AMAZING that non-dispensationalist cannot discern prophecies from revelations 🤦♂️
The death, burial, and ressurection was PROPHESIED in the OT but it was not REVEALED.
Jesus says this SEVERAL TIMES!! PAY ATTENTION:
Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the *prophets* concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on: And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again. *And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.* Luke 18:31-34 KJV
IT WASN'T REVEALED. DAVID prophesied, not revealed. David was still *literally* sacrificing animals for sins before he died for crying out loud 😂
Non-dispensationalist love ignorance almost as much a Atheist
Non-dispensationalist are mentally ill:
And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, *what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?* And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: *but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.* He saith unto him, Which? *Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.* Matt 19:16-19 KJV
😱 O NO NON-DISPENSATIONALIST! WHAT GOSPEL WAS JESUS PREACHING??! IT CERTAINLY WASN'T HIS DEATH, BURIAL, AND RESSURECTION!!
Duh. This whole chapter was to show the rich young ruler that HE HAD NOT KEPT THE COMMANDMENTS. None of us have. The rich young ruler thought he had, and he had not. He didn't love the Lord with his whole heart and soul, he loved riches more. Do you really think Jesus was telling him to keep the law to obtain salvation? He was showing him how HE HADN'T...BECAUSE NONE OF HAVE. It's never been about keeping the law. It's always been one gospel- by grace through faith. If you really think this passage was about keeping the law for salvation, you have no idea what salvation is.
@Matthew Martin
I read the whole chapter...sorry
NO GOSPEL OF DEATH BURIAL RESSURECTION 🤦♂️
@@CassieRaeMcMurtry
Great! So show me in the chapter where Jesus says "ETERNAL LIFE IS GAINED BY BELIEVING MY DEATH BURIAL AND RESSURECTION"
I'll wait...
@@youngnixx88788 Are you seriously saying you believe Jesus was telling him salvation is obtained by keeping the law??!!! It doesn't need to be in that chapter. It's in the whole New Testament. In fact, John is all about how to obtain salvation- and that is by BELIEVING ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. If you think you can be saved by keeping the law, you need to go read John, get saved, come back, and we can continue our discussion. Unbelievable.
@@CassieRaeMcMurtry
Im simply quoting the scripture. I didn't say anything regarding what I believe.
But YOU non-dispensationalist are *sinning* by *adding* to Gods words (Prov 30:5-6 KJV)
If the gospel was "ALWAYS AND ONLY THE DEATH, BURIAL, AND RESSURECTION OF JESUS CHRIST", THEN BIBLICALLY EXPLAIN WHY JESUS TOLD THE YOUNG MAN IF HE WANTS ETERNAL LIFE, KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS