Amen. A good, simple & easy-to-understand explanation, if we simply believe what the Scriptures plainly state. There's only one reason why someone would not understand what you've said in this video: "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned."
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Galatians 3:8) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) 10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
The simple answer to the question of who owns the land is found in Gen 28:13,14. God appears to Jacob (later, Israel) and says, “ I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee well I give it, and to thy seed.” And lest one think “seed” refers only to Jesus Christ, verse 14 clearly says “And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” The land belongs to Israel through promises made separately to Abraham, and to Isaac, and to Jacob/Israel.
Has Christ not been spread abroad in every direction and blessed all the families of the earth? I believe He has. Even when physical land Israel was not in existence, Christ was still blessing. I don’t hate Jews. I hope God changes the statistic of physical Israel today. Only 2% professing Christ. We (many)are the descendants under Christ, the seed (one) and we are worldwide.
Jacob and his sons, Moses, David, Solomon, and many others were blessed before Christ. Christ adopts Christians into his family, the seed of Isaac. Christians are heirs to the promise after Christ's death through accepting Him. However, I don't think that Jesus intended for it to be a casus belli for taking back the holy land.
Yes, God will keep His promises and everlasting covenant with His chosen remnant of Israel. If He did not keep His promises and everlasting covenant with them, HE would have to deny us HIS promises. He never denies himself
What did Christ say in Matthew chapter 21 about the "son" that is the "heir" to the land? Who was He talking about? What did He say would happen to those who reject Him as the "chief cornerstone"?
Israel is called the church Acts 7:37 This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear. Acts 7:38 This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:
My Brother, These are the passages you are missing in the equation. Christ in the equation equals understanding. Concerning the promises of God, and the failures of the fathers: Romans 15:8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers: 9 And that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thy name. Mic 7:18 Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy. 19 He will turn again, he will have compassion upon us; he will subdue our iniquities; and thou wilt cast all their sins into the depths of the sea. 20 Thou wilt perform the truth to Jacob, and the mercy to Abraham, which thou hast sworn unto our fathers from the days of old.
10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. 11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. 11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Zionism is a secular movement which has as much place in Christianity as Islam would. I have little doubt that the current State of Israel is not the planned state of God. I do believe that Scripture teaches of a time when the physical seed will awake to the reality of Christ. John Hagee, and other Zionist Theologians have corrupted this prophetic teaching. However, I see no just cause to take up arms against the truth of God concerning the salvation of Jews. They will have to trust in the true Christ. The prophetic State of Israel/ Zion will be the eternal Home of the Saved(Neither Jew, nor Gentile). Thanks for the thoughtful videos on this matter!
@@bibletruthfortodayfrompbc6167Sir, Israel is in total darkness NOW. It is God's plan in the future to keep His promises and everlasting covenant with His chosen remnant of Israel. Just read the OT and all God's future joy in bringing them back
@@Over-for-now , If they’re in total darkness then why did Paul pray, “Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.” (Rom 10:1-4)
The young brother is correct until about 5:10, when he suddenly swaps the meaning of “children of the flesh” from those born of, or descended of, a bondmaid - Agar/Hagar (Gal 4:22, 23, “but he who was of the bondwoman was born AFTER THE FLESH,” speaking of Ishmael) to somehow mean the physical descendants of Abraham. But Gal 4:21-31 is pretty clear that Hagar, Agar, bondwoman, bondage, flesh, Ishmael, Mount Sinai, Arabia and the first covenant are all on one side of the equation ... with Sara, Sarah, freewoman, free, spirit (29), Isaac, promise (23), Jerusalem and the second covenant all on the other side. Which correlates nicely back to Romans 9:8 - “That is, they which are the children of the flesh (Ishmael!) these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise (Isaac!) are counted for the seed.” Gal 4:29 says “But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.“ This is a clear and direct reference to Gen 21:9 and 10, when Ishmael (flesh) was mocking Isaac (spirit). The result is spelled out exactly the same in Gal 4:30 and Gen 21:10, which ties it all together with a nice little bow. 🎀 And if that’s too confusing for the young brother or others, we don’t even need to go back that far. Gen 28:13,14 tells us exactly who the land belongs to. God appears to Jacob (later, Israel) and says, “ I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee well I give it, and to thy seed.” And lest one think “seed” refers only to Jesus Christ, verse 14 says “And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” The land belongs to Israel through promises made separately to Abraham, and to Isaac, and to Jacob/Israel.
Who is Israel ?!? Acts 7:38 - who was the church in the wilderness ? The church is the called out assembly of believers , the called out assembly (church) in the wilderness was Israel . Anymore questions ?
I am not dispensational I do believe there is only one way to be saved from Judgment, However, Jesus himself pointed to the abomination that causes desolation So, therefore, there have to be Jewish people in the land that much I am sure of, What I also believe is in the scripture though I am not as dogmatic about, as I can't remember exactly where the exact scripture but at the time os the abomination does not the antichrist then turn to the jew then the remnant get protected by GOD I believe that is in rev where it talks of the woman and the child then after he turns to the Christians, and also I am pretty sure that remnant gets saved BY turning to him who they pierced and mourning, in other words, believed on the Christ
The door of faith for gentiles concerning being partakers of the body n promises in Christ is found in eph3:1-21 which today is the fellowship of the mystery and the full progressive revelation of the dispensation of grace given to us by the ressurected Jesus to Paul .this door of faith was in addition to to what was already prophetic in nature written down by prophets and spoken of since the world began! Acts 3:21 vs rom16:25 shows your not established in Paul’s gospel.whom bdw rom 11:32 yep you said it yourself! God judged isreal and sent paul to preach the gospel of uncircumcision to us which is only part of the new creation mystery which your not a faith full steward of !! Isreal is not the church! You make that the case ! This connection with Abraham was because he believe the promise before circumcision.so that it might be of faith !!!!you disagree with dispensationlism but the word applies when taught correctly which you don’t speak for them you use straw man arguments.todays Isreal is not
![[안방1열 풀캠4K] 베이비몬스터 'DRIP' (BABYMONSTER FullCam)│@SBS Inkigayo 241110](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AQ4RIghEvUs/mqdefault.jpg)
This series is so good. It needs to be viewed by millions.
Amen. A good, simple & easy-to-understand explanation, if we simply believe what the Scriptures plainly state. There's only one reason why someone would not understand what you've said in this video: "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned."
This is EXCELLENT. Thank you. I’m in a debate with a dispensationalist friend. This issue is so cut and dry.
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Galatians 3:8)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9)
10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
The simple answer to the question of who owns the land is found in Gen 28:13,14. God appears to Jacob (later, Israel) and says, “ I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee well I give it, and to thy seed.” And lest one think “seed” refers only to Jesus Christ, verse 14 clearly says “And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.”
The land belongs to Israel through promises made separately to Abraham, and to Isaac, and to Jacob/Israel.
Has Christ not been spread abroad in every direction and blessed all the families of the earth? I believe He has. Even when physical land Israel was not in existence, Christ was still blessing. I don’t hate Jews. I hope God changes the statistic of physical Israel today. Only 2% professing Christ. We (many)are the descendants under Christ, the seed (one) and we are worldwide.
Jacob and his sons, Moses, David, Solomon, and many others were blessed before Christ. Christ adopts Christians into his family, the seed of Isaac. Christians are heirs to the promise after Christ's death through accepting Him. However, I don't think that Jesus intended for it to be a casus belli for taking back the holy land.
Yes, God will keep His promises and everlasting covenant with His chosen remnant of Israel.
If He did not keep His promises and everlasting covenant with them, HE would have to deny us HIS promises.
He never denies himself
What did Christ say in Matthew chapter 21 about the "son" that is the "heir" to the land? Who was He talking about?
What did He say would happen to those who reject Him as the "chief cornerstone"?
Israel is called the church
Acts 7:37 This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear.
Acts 7:38 This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:
how is this refuting dispensationalism?
Because dispensationalist think that the Jews are still Gods chosen people and still rightfully inherit the land
My Brother,
These are the passages you are missing in the equation. Christ in the equation equals understanding. Concerning the promises of God, and the failures of the fathers: Romans 15:8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers: 9 And that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thy name.
Mic 7:18 Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy.
19 He will turn again, he will have compassion upon us; he will subdue our iniquities; and thou wilt cast all their sins into the depths of the sea. 20 Thou wilt perform the truth to Jacob, and the mercy to Abraham, which thou hast sworn unto our fathers from the days of old.
10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.
11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.
12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.
11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.
12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Zionism is a secular movement which has as much place in Christianity as Islam would. I have little doubt that the current State of Israel is not the planned state of God. I do believe that Scripture teaches of a time when the physical seed will awake to the reality of Christ. John Hagee, and other Zionist Theologians have corrupted this prophetic teaching. However, I see no just cause to take up arms against the truth of God concerning the salvation of Jews. They will have to trust in the true Christ. The prophetic State of Israel/ Zion will be the eternal Home of the Saved(Neither Jew, nor Gentile). Thanks for the thoughtful videos on this matter!
@@bibletruthfortodayfrompbc6167Sir, Israel is in total darkness NOW. It is God's plan in the future to keep His promises and everlasting covenant with His chosen remnant of Israel.
Just read the OT and all God's future joy in bringing them back
@@Over-for-now , If they’re in total darkness then why did Paul pray, “Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.” (Rom 10:1-4)
Promised with conditions.
The young brother is correct until about 5:10, when he suddenly swaps the meaning of “children of the flesh” from those born of, or descended of, a bondmaid - Agar/Hagar (Gal 4:22, 23, “but he who was of the bondwoman was born AFTER THE FLESH,” speaking of Ishmael) to somehow mean the physical descendants of Abraham.
But Gal 4:21-31 is pretty clear that Hagar, Agar, bondwoman, bondage, flesh, Ishmael, Mount Sinai, Arabia and the first covenant are all on one side of the equation ... with Sara, Sarah, freewoman, free, spirit (29), Isaac, promise (23), Jerusalem and the second covenant all on the other side. Which correlates nicely back to Romans 9:8 - “That is, they which are the children of the flesh (Ishmael!) these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise (Isaac!) are counted for the seed.”
Gal 4:29 says “But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.“ This is a clear and direct reference to Gen 21:9 and 10, when Ishmael (flesh) was mocking Isaac (spirit). The result is spelled out exactly the same in Gal 4:30 and Gen 21:10, which ties it all together with a nice little bow. 🎀
And if that’s too confusing for the young brother or others, we don’t even need to go back that far. Gen 28:13,14 tells us exactly who the land belongs to. God appears to Jacob (later, Israel) and says, “ I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee well I give it, and to thy seed.” And lest one think “seed” refers only to Jesus Christ, verse 14 says “And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.”
The land belongs to Israel through promises made separately to Abraham, and to Isaac, and to Jacob/Israel.
But Israel doesn't have all the land that was given to it by God. This is just a small patch basically not all that was promised to Abraham or Issac.
Great video pastor
Who is Israel ?!?
Acts 7:38 - who was the church in the wilderness ?
The church is the called out assembly of believers , the called out assembly (church) in the wilderness was Israel .
Anymore questions ?
I am not dispensational I do believe there is only one way to be saved from Judgment, However, Jesus himself pointed to the abomination that causes desolation So, therefore, there have to be Jewish people in the land that much I am sure of, What I also believe is in the scripture though I am not as dogmatic about, as I can't remember exactly where the exact scripture but at the time os the abomination does not the antichrist then turn to the jew then the remnant get protected by GOD I believe that is in rev where it talks of the woman and the child then after he turns to the Christians, and also I am pretty sure that remnant gets saved BY turning to him who they pierced and mourning, in other words, believed on the Christ
The door of faith for gentiles concerning being partakers of the body n promises in Christ is found in eph3:1-21 which today is the fellowship of the mystery and the full progressive revelation of the dispensation of grace given to us by the ressurected Jesus to Paul .this door of faith was in addition to to what was already prophetic in nature written down by prophets and spoken of since the world began! Acts 3:21 vs rom16:25 shows your not established in Paul’s gospel.whom bdw rom 11:32 yep you said it yourself! God judged isreal and sent paul to preach the gospel of uncircumcision to us which is only part of the new creation mystery which your not a faith full steward of !! Isreal is not the church! You make that the case ! This connection with Abraham was because he believe the promise before circumcision.so that it might be of faith !!!!you disagree with dispensationlism but the word applies when taught correctly which you don’t speak for them you use straw man arguments.todays Isreal is not
Ismael = Israel