UL Tests Storage Rack Fire in Facility

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @stevendinkins2613
    @stevendinkins2613 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great test.. The sprinklers saved the building and the surrounding products... But around this area were there higher temp sprinklers... there is no need for in rack sprinklers.

  • @BenjaminEsposti
    @BenjaminEsposti 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is the point of the fan? Wouldn't that interfere with the test, or is it a test to see the effects of the fire with an added draft in the building?

    • @hedgeearthridge6807
      @hedgeearthridge6807 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because some warehouses have fans, idiot

    • @francotarsitano7361
      @francotarsitano7361 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fire Sprinkler Automatic Extinguisher dry chemical ABC each unit covering 40 sqft installed on ceiling would suppress that fire with No pipes plumbing electrical or water. For the most effective affordable less damaging suppression Fire Sprinkler System using the Fire Sprinkler Automatic Extinguishers visit www.thefiresprinklerco.com

  • @elliepupper
    @elliepupper 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    The boxes were actually filled with Group A plastic cups, and not Class III paper cups.

  • @JB91710
    @JB91710 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, cardboard boxes and paper cups will burn. Now, what was the suppression system?

  • @ncc1701chris
    @ncc1701chris 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    somone open a window for this guy at 3:35.

  • @davedoherty9399
    @davedoherty9399 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    surely rack protection would have had the fire contained in the early stages,rather than the esfr heads????

  • @lipox2011
    @lipox2011 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Y, nunca se activaron las alarmas o que paso...??? o la prueba era quemar por quemar...!!!

  • @clipelectronicaetp8381
    @clipelectronicaetp8381 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    La prueba no resulta, sin haber tenido en perfecto estado los dispositivos y sensores contra-incendios

  • @JackSinger
    @JackSinger 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because of the smoke