Why Places of worship has cut off date 15 aug 1947 ? All his questions fall flat , the legislative has power to make policy unless arbitrary courts cant do anything.
@@iamchinmayapadhi True, some "entitled elites" consider India to be merely a 75 year old country. Anyway this video is 4 years old. No point of digging it.
@@SM-sb9fgbe scared of jumlebaz Fekendra Gautamdas Modani chowkidar of chor Adani who is selling the country to his gujju baniya friends and in process of making us bhikari.
Yeah!!!....if they feel they are being persecuted well then they should catch the train they missed in 1947....they divided Bharat into 3 pieces and didn't leave even after majority voting for separate country those scumbags!!!
😂 why u guys needs others to defend..you need bjp to tackle muslims..u need people to clean ur room u need cook to cook food u need many more 😂😂😂 Bro fight ur self u won't allowed to battle with many in all areas 😂 u know
@@sreekumarpillai9957 If you feel lot of loop holes in the Law why even after independence still useing those out dated Laws IN INDIA.THESE TYPE OF VOICES WILL COME ONLY FROM THE NEGETIVE MIND SET OF PEOPLE. if some body wants to do something good & opt for a change immediatley most of the people will stand against it. Better to rewrite the constitution & CRPC + I.P.C. NEED OF THE HOUR. PEOPLE SHOULD READ THE CAA PROPERLY..IT'S NOT GOING TO.HARM ANY ONE LIVING IN INDIA. KERALA. TAMILNADU. DELHI. W.BENGAL ARE AGAINST IT BECAUSE OF VOTE BANK POLITICES. NOTHING ELSE. LAW OF THE LAND. EVERY BODY HAS TO FOLLOW. OTHERWISE BEST MEDICINE IS 2 ND.EMERGENCY. Mr. Pilli you want to be the mouth piece for 2 G FAME BARKHA DUTT..GUD LUCK TO YOU.
@@sreekumarpillai9957 If you feel lot of loop holes in this then why we are useing the same out dated british laws. If some one wants to change it people like you will come stand to stop it. Read the CAA PROPERLY. NOTHING AGAINST ANY MUSLIM IN INDIA+ IT'S NOT GOING TO HARM ANY ONE IN INDIA..ABHINAV IS A ANOTHER PAPPU OF INDIA. BY THE WAY ARE YOU A MOUTH PIECE OF 2G FAME BARKHA DUTT..HAVE GUTS TO ANSWER. LAW OF THE LAND.WILL PREVAIL. NO BODY CAN SAY NO..OTHERWISE BEST MEDICINE FOR ALL IS THE 2ND EMERGENCY..NEED OF THE HOUR.ONLY NEGATIVE MIND SET PEOPLE ARE AGAINST IT & POLITICAL PARTIES FOR THE SAKE OF VOTE BANK..MR. PILLAI ANSWER..
Article 14 is for Indian not applicable on who is not yet citizens of India. Common sense…. Also if Article 14 is implemented then 50% of the Indian rules will be voided. Requesting CJI to implement Article 14 and remove waqft act; tax/no tax on all religion identity not just temples, caste based quota ans many more
@@purujitparashar4642yes first collegium system should be abolished. why preferential treatment in recruiting judges. Article 14 should be followed and all india judicial service should be implemented rather than nepotism
Please read more. There are some articles that are available for non citizens as well. Learning never ends. His points are good and hope there will be some great arguments in courts cause at the end we all need to better our understandings
Thanks to Mojo. Please put more videos of the sons and daughters of the judges of supreme court. It helps people to know the mindset of their parents and about their upbringing.
If this young lawyer's argument is taken to be factual, then India should open it's borders to become a FREE MARKET place for illegal migrants and anyone being procecuted or deprived of any rights anywhere in the world.
The guy is saying it is implemented In a unconstitutional way. He didn't say that india does not need a refugee policy. Think before commenting ,might help next time
@RiyanPt actually you need to hear it carefully those who are don't see the future in the pakistan what they had promised want to came bake to india but that time GOI doesn't gave them citizenship to all , is the dark part of india Constitution what kind of rubbish this statement is this if this Mr. "Chief justice " boy knows some basic history that on the basis of what india divided. Those who want a country on the basis of religion ( Islam religion) they done all the possible violent way to achieve it like great kalkata killing , riots in punjab etc.. so they got what they want . Now after their dreams shattered they want to come to that same country which is divided by them ... wtf only a total woke garbage 🗑 can tell this kind of things and only bigger woke garbage 🗑 can support this
@@dhrubajyotidebnath6192 I don't understand what you are trying to saying fully.pls try to improve your vocabulary. The guy in the video explained the flaws that caa have . A secular country that is india, giving citizenship on the basis of religion and excluding a single religion. And even if that is the case there still minorities left in these countries (Pakistan,Bangla,and afgan) , for whom the government is literally opening the gate , a population that is in crores. Don't you think that when they come to India after this, the government will have to give them shelter ,jobs,food etc.That the government cannot provide to the people of india right now. Think about it before saying 'modi ne Kiya toh soch Kiya hoga'. And I think a guy who went to law school at Stanford might have the better idea rather than you.
This is how educated individuals speak, unlike our PM, Mr. Modi, who wouldn't even stand a chance for a single minute in front of him. This is what India needs: educated, young leaders, not uneducated 10th-grade-pass old uncles.
@@theniravpanchal Being arrogant is not bad as such if person is learned. Being ignorant and then lecturing others is. I criticize even Mo D on ignorance ground. Moreover, Abhinav has opted legal profession and not politics but he talks more like a politician than as a lawyer.
@@anonymous-zt9xw If you are really concerned about the population of Bharat, kindly promote family planning among Muslims. Also CAA is expediting the citizenship process of those non-Muslims who are already in Bharat. Outsiders can apply for citizenship of Bharat only if they fulfill the requirement of old citizenship act i.e. not CAA requirements.
@@prohind who I am to promote it?? How china adopted one child norm ?? By government I guess. So why can't indian government do that?? Not only muslims also hindus of Bihar jharkhand are reproducing exponentially. I just wanna say we don't want any outsider in india by any special law. If someone want follow the old procedures. Don't invite all minorities from surrounding. We already f**ked up man .
Making laws that are discriminatory on religious ground is allowed by Indian constitution provided the reasoning for such discriminations is clearly spell out and abide certain criteria. There are numerous religion specific laws in India. CAA is perfectly constitutional. Opposition to CAA is mostly political.
He forgot there are many religion specific laws in India like Waqf board act, Minority Act where ONLY 'peacefuls' get some EXTRA privileges. Hindus living in a Hindu majority country and other religious groups like Parsi, Christians, Jews do not get any extra privileges. Why is this? Why he is not talking about this? If these rules are constitutional then why cannot Modi govt make some laws that are saving some minorities in the neighboring countries. I can conclude that this person is the epitome of what they call as "Liberandu".
He is obv refering to ART 14 which is a fundamental right. The "already existing laws" based on religion provide exclusive rights to people belonging to the particular religion without creating any disadvantage/discrimination b/w people belonging to diff religions or in some cases same religion (as the cases of Parsis cited by him) :)
I ask his father to teach law to his son 😅 Article 14 only applied on indian citizens (otherwise every foreinger allowed exam UPSC and join indian army base on right to equality )
Case - Olga Rosnina vs the Foreigners Regional Registration Office]. Goa bench of BOMBAY HIGH COURT held that not just citizens but non-citizens also have equal protection of laws. What you say is applicable as per article 15 and 16 which is not available to non-citizens. Govt. can set terms and conditions for appointing to government service.
@@OwaisAli-co9wo If you can post the detail response for all the question he raised. Could you please if you have. Interested to know your thoughts as well.
There is no confusion. CAA goes against the fundamentals of this country but it doesn't affect Indian citizens or Muslims. Both things are equally true.
@@rijzone If you talk about the fundamentals of Bharat as a nation, most Muslims should be out of Citizenship of Bharat. Remember the fundamentals of Bharat are several thousands years old and not certainly from the Mughal and British rule period. Secularism, an imported concept has become a political tool to destroy Bharat's Fundamentals as enshrined in Vedas, Upnishads, Gita, Mahabharat, Ramayana and similar writings. Quran and Bible are not part of Bharat. So talk about the Politics on CAA and not the fundamentals of Bharat.
@@prohindit's not about relegion. It is useless and harmful for all citizens of india . Aren't we reproducing sufficiently?? People in Bihar are doing 10 kids , we are one and half billion why you need more people??
This is what happens to elites. they live in an ivory tower and come up with such grand standing lecture. All his life he would have lived in the luxurious judges quarter with 40 domestic helps. Why do they care of ordinary citizens. Every country has to be selective about who they chose to let within their land. Giving gyan to people because he is sure he will become a CJI soon
Why do these guys simply anti-national? By same logic partition happened based on Religion. That way they need to be at the place where they belong to.
CAA is for outsiders... Not for indian citizens... It doesn't violate article 14... And there are more exceptions for article 14 also... Separate laws and acts for specific groups... He is not getting the point...
Your father is a great man, Now you Capture people's attention Abhinav Great statement very appreciatable. very proud to have a people like you in our country. Very grateful.
One more sentence I would like to add. In sanathana Dharma we don't consider anybody athiest,muslim,Christians etc. We say eshwara sarva bhuthanam including birds, animals,tree, mountains,rivers etc etc. CAA HAS IT'S PURPOSE
@@paragraysarkar404Logic is Those who got between beasts and escaped beasts to save their daughters and sisters and came to India before 2014 deserve our sympathy and blessings of Bharat mata.
@@theniravpanchal yah definitely . What's about those who have fled Iran for the same reason and came INDIA? How refugee from Afghanistan is different from Iran if the reason is ethenic or religious oppression.
This advocate should become a activist he will win street debates but not court cases that's for sure. Kid doesn't know what and how articles and precedent works looks like, he needs to study constitutional law again lol
Why will I invite someone into my house? Because I want to. Nobody can tell why are you inviting him but not the other one….. it is my policy. My house my rules…. Same with India. Indian Parliament makes the rules…. As simple as that!!!
Unfortunately the house has other members too, and you've to take their thoughts into consideration as well before letting anyone come into that house.
@@peacefulpomegranate9846 BJP is the party that was chosen by majority of India’s population.. They bring out a law and that is objected by a certain population and not a majority population.. This law will exist coz that’s the wish of majority of India’s population I don’t see every Muslim protesting in the streets.. They mind their own business
Its every country's right to give citizenship based on what they think is in their benefit APART FROM THE STANDARD PROCEDURE. Some countries give citizenship on the basis of how much dollars you have in your bank account, some others give citizenship on the basis of how much political points you can score for them.... and so on. So what's wrong if India makes special provisions with regard to citizenship without changing the standard procedure of citizenship. That's the whole argument.
Liberandus about taking Rohingya Muslims - So cute. Take more. This is not anti-Hindu Liberandus about taking Hindus back to India - Oh, this is Islamophobia, Hindutva. I dont give an F about all this propaganda. CAA is a must and Hindus and Sikhs protection is most important because India is the Holyland of these religions. Simple.
Article 14,20,21A,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 are fundamental rights and applicable to all indians and foreigners. Atleast check the data before speaking bull shit about a practising high court advocate
He is one of the finest example of h'in'd'us dh'immies. Guys remember Beacuse if thie type of people in just 1000 years we lost biggest land whivh now are being called Afghanistan, pakistan, Bangladesh. In logo ka ground realities se koi dur sur se nata nahi hai. Bas apne delusion aur caccon me reahate hai. Kashmir pandit se puche aise soch se ynka kya hua.
@@anonymous-zt9xw my names tells truth and it tells what will happen to h'in'dus and others in in india if Beacuse of people like him and you giving free hand to ez'lamists.
Dimag se Paidal, Where i said about his education. The title of video is self explanatory . Barkha herself wrote son of CJI, otherwise this speech is just another speech. @@yomamasohot6411
Sir the most fundamental flaw in Chandrachud's argument is his flawed understanding of A-14 which is such an important article of Indian constitution. A-14 allows for reasonable classification, without this we would not have had different laws for Juvenile crime, many laws catering to SC&ST, etc. I am seriously concered if this man goes on to become a SC judge (maybe CJI) with such flawed understanding of Indian Constitution. A-14 provides for unequal treatment of unequals (under Equal Protection of Law), state is empowered to reasonably clasify people and thereby apply law differential among these group. And here the classification is on basis of "Religious" persecution.
I will honestly end his whole agenda , I just liked his one and only point about the timing for different countries other than that the people who are clapping are just dumb.
💯💯 and that too be countered cuz Parliament can make any law if it passes the constitution validity they can make any law. it won't matter if the law is good or bad..
Article 29 and article 30 has been rebranded to accommodate foreigners....it is as simple as that....if CAA is unconstitutional, then how is article 29 and 30 constitutional....
😂😂😂 Athiests can be counted as Hindus, Buddhists or Jains since these Dharms don't require you to believe in god. I myself am a Hindu athiest. There are so many like me.
I am not only a supporter of Partition but a champion and I consider it very essential. I find Savarkar's demand for an undivided nation (Akhand Bharat) with both Hindus and Muslims together a very novice thinking. My only pre-condition is that every single Muslim must be moved to Pakistan and every single Hindu must be moved to India otherwise new nation will never be a stable nation which is an essential condition for progress and development. (BR Ambedkar in the book on Pakistan and Partition of India, written 7 years before actual partition. He remained supportive of this statement till the actual partition)
This is the "Populat Exchange" suggestd by Dr Ambedkar. After suggesting this, He was mocked, humiliated and forced to resign by Nehru who started harassing him and not letting him work.
There could be 100 others who could be saved, India saved some, according to deemed capacity, what is problem, this is so stupid. This is like if you could help one in need, you will not because you are not able to save other who is from another religion and not in your city. This is bullshit argument.
All these useless discussions are happening because our justice system is slow. If we can appeal and get law ratified in a court of law, why is everyone so worried. Just go to court and ask if this is constitutional.
He forgot there are many religion specific laws in India like Waqf board act, Minority Act where ONLY 'peacefuls' get some EXTRA privileges. Hindus living in a Hindu majority country and other religious groups like Parsi, Christians, Jews do not get any extra privileges. Why is this? Why he is not talking about this? If these rules are constitutional then why cannot Modi govt make some laws that are saving some minorities in the neighboring countries. I can conclude that this person is the epitome of what they call as "Liberandu".
Mr Abhinav Chandrachud overlooked the historical background completely. In 1950-51 the Indian and Pakistani governments signed the so-called Nehru-Liaquat pact under which each country solemnly assured that minorities would be safe and their interests would be protected. Syama Prasad Mookerji opposed the pact saying that Pakistan cannot be trusted to keep its word but Nehru ignored him. Mookerji then resigned from the central cabinet. But history was to prove him right. Pakistan declared itself to be an Islamic state where minorities were oppressed and the situation has only worsened over the years. Bangladesh is also an Islamic country and minorities fare badly. On the other hand, the condition of minorities is much better in India and in some respects they have rights not given to majority Hindus. As for Afghanistan the minorities like Hindus, Sikhs etc had gone there from undivided India during the British rule and CAA 2019 seeks to grant citizenship rights. Article 14 applies to equals and not to unequals. There is a great difference between the status of Muslims and non-Muslims in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan and therefore article 14 cannot be blindly applied. Mr Chandrachud spoke of atheists and agnostics. Now Jainism is strictly speaking an atheistic religion and Buddhism is fundamentally agnostic. Furthermore, atheism is not unknown among Hindus. V.D. Savarkar was an atheist. As for cutoff dates, even our constitution has cutoff dates for vesting citizenship on certain categories of people. As for 1987 and 2004 amendments of the Citizenship Act, they do not deal with minorities or minorities and have cut off dates.
Wonderful ! No wonder why people like him are entitled to become judges, he has the audacity to speak against the general masses of india /majority having moronic idiosyncracies which is also ostensible in the comment section!
Bakwaas baat samajna jaroori bhi nahi hain😂😂😂 Aur wahi chawale ko Puri duniya "Boss" bolti hain...vahi chaiwala duniya ka sabse famous P.M hain...World leaders are also andhbhakt according to you pseudo-secular left librandus😂😂😂😂
This is how educated individuals speak, unlike our PM, Mr. Modi, who wouldn't even stand a chance for a single minute in front of him. This is what India needs: educated, young leaders, not uneducated 10th-grade-pass old uncles.
So you are saying that we should have included 100s of religions that are present in every corner of the world … but how many of them are present in these 3 countries… just asking..
But the question is why only these three county, why not Myanmar who have been persecuting rohingyas for so long as they made them the most persecuted minority in the world, it really shows discrimination tbh, I mean if we want to help minorities who are persecuted then why not start with them, is it because the current regime only wants people who share their faith , then muslims can also apeal to this logic to any other muslim refugees, but on a humanitarian objective stand point the most deserving candidates should be rohingya for a bill to help persecuted Minorities
Pl read through caa law...when india was divided... Go to that history... Start ftom there.. Those who were minorities in those affected states due to partition of india.... That is the topic.. Not partition of insrael or germany... Or any. Other country. Stop talking nonsense...
Please study and come. You are confused and don’t confuse the ignorants. Laws of our is for the people of our country. It won’t be written according to individual perception or world’s ideas. If you stay here better abide by it or else get out.
that's how the mature country people look like where there are question asking guys stand and speak on behalf of other people ,on the other side banana republic of pakistan and its representatives never crossed the religious line of their islam and never raised question against religious persecution of its minorities. bharat is still secular(not by enforcement of its origin in preamble) but by its cultural values
mein kuch nhi hu kuch khass nhi hai but mere baap dada congress se ghooska kar unke liye kaam kiye unke liye decision diye unconstitutional toh emergency bi tah pr congress humme haddi dal rhi thi nhi isiliye hum kuch bole nhi. aaj mere baap ka mere jo bi hain unke liye kaam krke toh hain toh mein unhi ke liye kaam krunga ye 3 desho mein hindus se bahut nafrat krte hain sabse zyda hindus se lekin fir bi unke liye caa nhi aane dunga madarsa gya nhi but waha ko hu ye sabit krne ke liye hinduo ko fayda na ho isliye anti caa bi bolunga by some spoiled rich brat
@@me_gaurav_rana andhbhakt ab CJI ko bhi congressi bolne Lage hai waah. Jo chiz unconstitutional hai wo band hogi. Modi kitne hi law na banade. Ye desh sanvidhan se chalta h or humesha rahega. Tujhe sanvidhan se taklif hai to Nepal chale ja
@@PelamPaal unpad hain kya jaake pad supreme court ke judges pr corruption charges lage hain and ye saare western culture wale elite judge leftist hain
So according to him, tomorrow if whole Pakistani decide to get into India we must give them all citizenship just because they are inside India.. irrespective of why there here right ??? .... if he is saying about equality will he support law where both civil & criminals laws are equal for everyone ???? do these people have basic understanding of what's mean by securing border of a country and how many soldiers live are wasted since the lack of a correct system and a common law ???
Article 14 talks about providing "the state shall not deny equality before law or equal protection of law...." CAA is not denying any citizen/resident of India any equality...rather it is providing accelerated means of citizenship after making intelligent classification for the (limited )objective of the law... that's how it needs to be interpreted...not the other way round, that somebody is being deprived of equality from India, because the law itself is directed towards the persecuted minorities of other nations and not those who are already in India! Though, I agree with most of his points, but he talking about the scope of the law...just because the law in question is in the scope of it's rationale or cases of application limited doesn't mean that the law is unconstitutional! The law will still would remain constitutional, because all the questions this young man is raising are mostly policy prerogative of the executive, they are not arbitrary, just limited to the extent the legislature or executive wants it to be! Obviously the law could be expanded or contracted and yet it shall remain loyal to its humanitarian objectives...a law wouldn't become unconstitutional just because it is limited in it's humanitarian import and just because it ought to be most expanded in the same according to some people!...if that's the argument, we would end up opening all our borders and return to the mediveal times, when any pathan from Afghanistan could make a dash inside india! SC must not poke its nose in policy matters explicitly placed within the constitutional domain. Yes, we do conform to due process of law, but we are fundamentally based on the doctrine of procedure established by law. SC needs to be very careful and recluse itself from adolescent judicial activism!
Article 14 applies to Indian citizen not to refugees.
Bewkoof constitution padh le pahle, Modi ki bakt
Correct . Maybe he should go and fight the case and we will see whether his arguments hold true.
Why Places of worship has cut off date 15 aug 1947 ? All his questions fall flat , the legislative has power to make policy unless arbitrary courts cant do anything.
My piss is better than hinduism.
@@iamchinmayapadhi True, some "entitled elites" consider India to be merely a 75 year old country. Anyway this video is 4 years old. No point of digging it.
Barkha started her new agenda . This time with the son of CJI
Only eligibility for this guy is that He is son and grandson of current CJI and grandson of ex-CJI. But who is he other than that!?
He is intelligent and well read unlike you.
Next cji? I am scared 😢
Puppet
an INDIAN citizen.
@@SM-sb9fgbe scared of jumlebaz Fekendra Gautamdas Modani chowkidar of chor Adani who is selling the country to his gujju baniya friends and in process of making us bhikari.
This is what happens when silver spoon entitlement becomes lawyer as a freebie 🙈🙈🙈
Well said .
ANDHBHAKT 😂
And when wife deserter and serial jumlebaz with fake printed MA certificate becomes PM of the country.😂😂😂
Do you even know the words or the act laws he's mentioning🤣🤣 family burden modi dont need you , your family does🤣🤣
shhhhh.. he may be out next CJI..
Let him debate with Sai Deepak.
Dig Jinnah's graver n those who wanted partition n who cause of India's headache
Yeah!!!....if they feel they are being persecuted well then they should catch the train they missed in 1947....they divided Bharat into 3 pieces and didn't leave even after majority voting for separate country those scumbags!!!
JSD will piss his pants bro😂
@@saptarshibanik4656 Lol we all know whoever comes to debate JSD will need to come wearing nappies to avoid getting shamed.
😂 why u guys needs others to defend..you need bjp to tackle muslims..u need people to clean ur room u need cook to cook food u need many more 😂😂😂 Bro fight ur self u won't allowed to battle with many in all areas 😂 u know
Why would he debate Deeepak. That guy is completely brainwashed . There is nothing that this guy has said is wrong. H3 actually is stating facts
Mr. Abhinav Chandrachud is the future and bright CJI, Superem Court of India. God's blessing to him.
Barkha Dutt. You telecasting this because you need CJI help in your 2 G case. Radia tape. We are all waching . No body can escape.
Which 2 G case in Supreme court at this time ?
@@AbhinavSharma16 CBI already appealed against the accuital of all the people. Its pending . In the near future it will be reopened.
Why the reluctance to accept the holes in this law? Blind belief?????
@@sreekumarpillai9957 If you feel lot of loop holes in the Law why even after independence still useing those out dated Laws IN INDIA.THESE TYPE OF VOICES WILL COME ONLY FROM THE NEGETIVE MIND SET OF PEOPLE. if some body wants to do something good & opt for a change immediatley most of the people will stand against it. Better to rewrite the constitution & CRPC + I.P.C. NEED OF THE HOUR. PEOPLE SHOULD READ THE CAA PROPERLY..IT'S NOT GOING TO.HARM ANY ONE LIVING IN INDIA. KERALA. TAMILNADU. DELHI. W.BENGAL ARE AGAINST IT BECAUSE OF VOTE BANK POLITICES. NOTHING ELSE. LAW OF THE LAND. EVERY BODY HAS TO FOLLOW. OTHERWISE BEST MEDICINE IS 2 ND.EMERGENCY. Mr. Pilli you want to be the mouth piece for 2 G FAME BARKHA DUTT..GUD LUCK TO YOU.
@@sreekumarpillai9957 If you feel lot of loop holes in this then why we are useing the same out dated british laws. If some one wants to change it people like you will come stand to stop it. Read the CAA PROPERLY. NOTHING AGAINST ANY MUSLIM IN INDIA+ IT'S NOT GOING TO HARM ANY ONE IN INDIA..ABHINAV IS A ANOTHER PAPPU OF INDIA. BY THE WAY ARE YOU A MOUTH PIECE OF 2G FAME BARKHA DUTT..HAVE GUTS TO ANSWER. LAW OF THE LAND.WILL PREVAIL. NO BODY CAN SAY NO..OTHERWISE BEST MEDICINE FOR ALL IS THE 2ND EMERGENCY..NEED OF THE HOUR.ONLY NEGATIVE MIND SET PEOPLE ARE AGAINST IT & POLITICAL PARTIES FOR THE SAKE OF VOTE BANK..MR. PILLAI ANSWER..
Article 14 is for Indian not applicable on who is not yet citizens of India. Common sense…. Also if Article 14 is implemented then 50% of the Indian rules will be voided. Requesting CJI to implement Article 14 and remove waqft act; tax/no tax on all religion identity not just temples, caste based quota ans many more
no bro, article 14 says that it is for every person ,not every citizen ,know the difference .it is for both citizen and foreigner
@@rajudodamani8402 then first remove waqf board and muslim personal law board.
@@purujitparashar4642yes first collegium system should be abolished. why preferential treatment in recruiting judges. Article 14 should be followed and all india judicial service should be implemented rather than nepotism
@@purujitparashar4642 I support uniform civil code bro
Please read more. There are some articles that are available for non citizens as well. Learning never ends. His points are good and hope there will be some great arguments in courts cause at the end we all need to better our understandings
Thanks to Mojo. Please put more videos of the sons and daughters of the judges of supreme court. It helps people to know the mindset of their parents and about their upbringing.
Like father he is brilliant too
If this young lawyer's argument is taken to be factual, then India should open it's borders to become a FREE MARKET place for illegal migrants and anyone being procecuted or deprived of any rights anywhere in the world.
The guy is saying it is implemented In a unconstitutional way. He didn't say that india does not need a refugee policy. Think before commenting ,might help next time
Nobody will him seriously unless he sits as a judge. 😅
@RiyanPt actually you need to hear it carefully those who are don't see the future in the pakistan what they had promised want to came bake to india but that time GOI doesn't gave them citizenship to all , is the dark part of india Constitution what kind of rubbish this statement is this if this Mr. "Chief justice " boy knows some basic history that on the basis of what india divided. Those who want a country on the basis of religion ( Islam religion) they done all the possible violent way to achieve it like great kalkata killing , riots in punjab etc.. so they got what they want . Now after their dreams shattered they want to come to that same country which is divided by them ... wtf only a total woke garbage 🗑 can tell this kind of things and only bigger woke garbage 🗑 can support this
@@dhrubajyotidebnath6192 True bro!! These pseudo-secular left librandus I say!! Pathetic!!😑
@@dhrubajyotidebnath6192 I don't understand what you are trying to saying fully.pls try to improve your vocabulary. The guy in the video explained the flaws that caa have . A secular country that is india, giving citizenship on the basis of religion and excluding a single religion. And even if that is the case there still minorities left in these countries (Pakistan,Bangla,and afgan) , for whom the government is literally opening the gate , a population that is in crores. Don't you think that when they come to India after this, the government will have to give them shelter ,jobs,food etc.That the government cannot provide to the people of india right now. Think about it before saying 'modi ne Kiya toh soch Kiya hoga'. And I think a guy who went to law school at Stanford might have the better idea rather than you.
This boy is a great advertisement for how rich and powerful genes don't necessarily result in smart
Rightly said
He's smart but he's hypocrite
Perfect case study for judicial nepotism...
This is how educated individuals speak, unlike our PM, Mr. Modi, who wouldn't even stand a chance for a single minute in front of him. This is what India needs: educated, young leaders, not uneducated 10th-grade-pass old uncles.
Can't believe the ignorance of Abhinav about the background of CAA.
Is Abhinav another PAPPOO?
Ofcourse.. His father is also arrogant like this.
@@theniravpanchal Being arrogant is not bad as such if person is learned. Being ignorant and then lecturing others is. I criticize even Mo D on ignorance ground. Moreover, Abhinav has opted legal profession and not politics but he talks more like a politician than as a lawyer.
@@prohindhuge popularity will gonna f##k us all plz don't call many outsiders we are already in huge burden of one and half billion
@@anonymous-zt9xw If you are really concerned about the population of Bharat, kindly promote family planning among Muslims. Also CAA is expediting the citizenship process of those non-Muslims who are already in Bharat. Outsiders can apply for citizenship of Bharat only if they fulfill the requirement of old citizenship act i.e. not CAA requirements.
@@prohind who I am to promote it?? How china adopted one child norm ?? By government I guess. So why can't indian government do that?? Not only muslims also hindus of Bihar jharkhand are reproducing exponentially. I just wanna say we don't want any outsider in india by any special law. If someone want follow the old procedures. Don't invite all minorities from surrounding. We already f**ked up man .
Making laws that are discriminatory on religious ground is allowed by Indian constitution provided the reasoning for such discriminations is clearly spell out and abide certain criteria. There are numerous religion specific laws in India. CAA is perfectly constitutional. Opposition to CAA is mostly political.
He forgot there are many religion specific laws in India like Waqf board act, Minority Act where ONLY 'peacefuls' get some EXTRA privileges. Hindus living in a Hindu majority country and other religious groups like Parsi, Christians, Jews do not get any extra privileges. Why is this? Why he is not talking about this?
If these rules are constitutional then why cannot Modi govt make some laws that are saving some minorities in the neighboring countries.
I can conclude that this person is the epitome of what they call as "Liberandu".
He is obv refering to ART 14 which is a fundamental right. The "already existing laws" based on religion provide exclusive rights to people belonging to the particular religion without creating any disadvantage/discrimination b/w people belonging to diff religions or in some cases same religion (as the cases of Parsis cited by him) :)
DH CAA is for persecuted minorities in 3 countries,rest all can claim citizenship by different routes .
Now I realise brainless & senseless can become professionals😂
Tu bas comment kr 😂
Now bhakt spotted 😂
@@VikashRaj-ms2wg Kambhakt located.
i agree man. How come this fools goes to such high positon ? that's why india judiciary is fucked up
I ask his father to teach law to his son 😅
Article 14 only applied on indian citizens (otherwise every foreinger allowed exam UPSC and join indian army base on right to equality )
Case - Olga Rosnina vs the Foreigners Regional Registration Office].
Goa bench of BOMBAY HIGH COURT held that not just citizens but non-citizens also have equal protection of laws.
What you say is applicable as per article 15 and 16 which is not available to non-citizens.
Govt. can set terms and conditions for appointing to government service.
He Got it wrong from 1st paragraph
Who are u?
Idiotic... Spreading confusion about CAA... Nothing else 😂
@@OwaisAli-co9wo If you can post the detail response for all the question he raised. Could you please if you have. Interested to know your thoughts as well.
There is no confusion. CAA goes against the fundamentals of this country but it doesn't affect Indian citizens or Muslims. Both things are equally true.
Only you are confused
@@rijzone If you talk about the fundamentals of Bharat as a nation, most Muslims should be out of Citizenship of Bharat. Remember the fundamentals of Bharat are several thousands years old and not certainly from the Mughal and British rule period. Secularism, an imported concept has become a political tool to destroy Bharat's Fundamentals as enshrined in Vedas, Upnishads, Gita, Mahabharat, Ramayana and similar writings. Quran and Bible are not part of Bharat. So talk about the Politics on CAA and not the fundamentals of Bharat.
@@prohindit's not about relegion. It is useless and harmful for all citizens of india . Aren't we reproducing sufficiently?? People in Bihar are doing 10 kids , we are one and half billion why you need more people??
Absolute irrelevant logic.... If this is the standard of our judiciary (being an advocate) then, we are heading for a doomsday.
He is saying literally bullshit things 😂😂😂....athiest ,Jews and all. Brace yourself he will be the next CJI through our collegium system😂😂😂😂
CJI and His Son are in the Payroll of KHANGRESS
Completely agree with your comment.
Don't just say he is illogical rather put your argument against his
@@RohanRrthow is atheism any "more bullshit" than religion.
Those who are talking about equality, have they forgotten about Jizyah tax?
This is what happens to elites. they live in an ivory tower and come up with such grand standing lecture. All his life he would have lived in the luxurious judges quarter with 40 domestic helps. Why do they care of ordinary citizens. Every country has to be selective about who they chose to let within their land. Giving gyan to people because he is sure he will become a CJI soon
Nobody cares what he thinks..
There is logic in his argument
@@paragraysarkar404 L k logic
@@RR-wp8jt konsa logic less laga ??
@@paragraysarkar404 argument for the sake of argument
No pragmatic outlook...
@@paragraysarkar404Ofcourse just like terrorists find logic in Qur'an.
Some people think they are very intelligent by pretending to be intelligent 😅😅😅
It works though in cases where people don't know any better..
So he thinks Pakistan and Bangladesh is not theocratic state by giving example of UK
@GyanKhan-ib1nu😂😂😂😂😂
His I.Q is more than all of bhakts those who are chanting Modibhakti.😂😂
Likes on this video shows,
💪 Democracy is still alive in India 🇮🇳🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤
Why do these guys simply anti-national? By same logic partition happened based on Religion. That way they need to be at the place where they belong to.
Just simple as that
Fair points. Anyone wants to argue should debate with valid points instead of just trolling.
CAA is for outsiders... Not for indian citizens... It doesn't violate article 14... And there are more exceptions for article 14 also... Separate laws and acts for specific groups... He is not getting the point...
Article 14 includes both citizens and foreigners
What are you smoking 🚬 😮
Well America would not be what it is today if not for outsiders and North Korea would not be what we know if it had outsiders.
Anti-whatever,
But Pro-India, thats all we care.
Your father is a great man, Now you Capture people's attention Abhinav Great statement very appreciatable. very proud to have a people like you in our country. Very grateful.
One more sentence I would like to add.
In sanathana Dharma we don't consider anybody athiest,muslim,Christians etc.
We say eshwara sarva bhuthanam including birds, animals,tree, mountains,rivers etc etc.
CAA HAS IT'S PURPOSE
I dont have a religion. You cant speak for every induvidual in India. Religion is a farce, like Hinduism is.
Bap ka chabi chipkane se harkoi unka bat sunega kya😂😂
Argument me dam hai .
Tu hasta hi rahega koi logic nehi de payega .
@@paragraysarkar404Logic diya gaya par samajhne ke liye dimaag chahiye
@@paragraysarkar404Logic is Those who got between beasts and escaped beasts to save their daughters and sisters and came to India before 2014 deserve our sympathy and blessings of Bharat mata.
@@theniravpanchal yah definitely .
What's about those who have fled Iran for the same reason and came INDIA?
How refugee from Afghanistan is different from Iran if the reason is ethenic or religious oppression.
Collegium personified
God save those who goes to this man for legal advice. 😁
This advocate should become a activist he will win street debates but not court cases that's for sure. Kid doesn't know what and how articles and precedent works looks like, he needs to study constitutional law again lol
Wish this kid meets J sai deepak one day and be his Disciple....
So be it! Tadasthu!!😂
So be it!! Tadasthu!❤...Then he'll know how stupid he was😂😂😂
J Sai Deepak destroyed Barkha dutta point to point,she needs schooling from Sai Deepak.
*What about our Ex-Muslims Community ?*
Why will I invite someone into my house? Because I want to. Nobody can tell why are you inviting him but not the other one….. it is my policy. My house my rules…. Same with India. Indian Parliament makes the rules…. As simple as that!!!
Unfortunately the house has other members too, and you've to take their thoughts into consideration as well before letting anyone come into that house.
@@peacefulpomegranate9846 BJP is the party that was chosen by majority of India’s population..
They bring out a law and that is objected by a certain population and not a majority population..
This law will exist coz that’s the wish of majority of India’s population
I don’t see every Muslim protesting in the streets.. They mind their own business
so law of dynasty? 😂😂😂
He chose not to mention Muslims
Collegium system is also unconstitutional. 😂😂😂
like father, like son ❤
Its every country's right to give citizenship based on what they think is in their benefit APART FROM THE STANDARD PROCEDURE. Some countries give citizenship on the basis of how much dollars you have in your bank account, some others give citizenship on the basis of how much political points you can score for them.... and so on. So what's wrong if India makes special provisions with regard to citizenship without changing the standard procedure of citizenship. That's the whole argument.
He will go and call them unconstitutional 😂
Liberandus about taking Rohingya Muslims - So cute. Take more. This is not anti-Hindu
Liberandus about taking Hindus back to India - Oh, this is Islamophobia, Hindutva.
I dont give an F about all this propaganda. CAA is a must and Hindus and Sikhs protection is most important because India is the Holyland of these religions. Simple.
Well explained sir,very thought provoking points,great job,hope the intellectual lot will open their eyes to see the facts 🎉❤
Why nobody talks about the people who stay illegally in our country
Some of the most foolish, easily rebuttable and refutable argument. He is a lawyer who is talking morality, religion and everything but law.
Article 14,20,21A,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 are fundamental rights and applicable to all indians and foreigners. Atleast check the data before speaking bull shit about a practising high court advocate
He is one of the finest example of h'in'd'us dh'immies. Guys remember Beacuse if thie type of people in just 1000 years we lost biggest land whivh now are being called Afghanistan, pakistan, Bangladesh. In logo ka ground realities se koi dur sur se nata nahi hai. Bas apne delusion aur caccon me reahate hai. Kashmir pandit se puche aise soch se ynka kya hua.
Your name tell all about you .
@@anonymous-zt9xw my names tells truth and it tells what will happen to h'in'dus and others in in india if Beacuse of people like him and you giving free hand to ez'lamists.
Omg 100 % Ditoo..❤❤❤like our CJI
Eligibility:- son Of CJI 😂😂
Traces of collegium system
Khud tu office boy hoga aur ek vakil ko bolega ki voh unpad
Dimag se Paidal, Where i said about his education. The title of video is self explanatory . Barkha herself wrote son of CJI, otherwise this speech is just another speech. @@yomamasohot6411
Sir the most fundamental flaw in Chandrachud's argument is his flawed understanding of A-14 which is such an important article of Indian constitution.
A-14 allows for reasonable classification, without this we would not have had different laws for Juvenile crime, many laws catering to SC&ST, etc.
I am seriously concered if this man goes on to become a SC judge (maybe CJI) with such flawed understanding of Indian Constitution.
A-14 provides for unequal treatment of unequals (under Equal Protection of Law), state is empowered to reasonably clasify people and thereby apply law differential among these group. And here the classification is on basis of "Religious" persecution.
How it matters to us?he is not CJI of India or his views are important. to us....that's all
I will honestly end his whole agenda , I just liked his one and only point about the timing for different countries other than that the people who are clapping are just dumb.
💯💯
and that too be countered cuz Parliament can make any law if it passes the constitution validity they can make any law.
it won't matter if the law is good or bad..
Seems absolute mad person.
Just like his Bika hua Father.
@@theniravpanchalbika Hua Bjp hai tu
Not Mad but evil person.
CAA IS THE NEED OF THE HOUR. MR.AMIT SHAH CONGRATULATIONS FOR THE BOLD STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
We want caa
Kya krte ho bhai
We want no CAA
Article 29 and article 30 has been rebranded to accommodate foreigners....it is as simple as that....if CAA is unconstitutional, then how is article 29 and 30 constitutional....
If this dude ends up becoming a SC judge in future. I have seriously lost faith in our judiciary.
Ask Congress for the reason......religion based partition.
He has so much bias...rattan mar ke Aya Hai 😂😂😂
Tera aukat hai Bolne ki etni english 😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂 Athiests can be counted as Hindus, Buddhists or Jains since these Dharms don't require you to believe in god. I myself am a Hindu athiest. There are so many like me.
Well there is thing called common sense to understand CAA which people like him dont have.
I am not only a supporter of Partition but a champion and I consider it very essential. I find Savarkar's demand for an undivided nation (Akhand Bharat) with both Hindus and Muslims together a very novice thinking. My only pre-condition is that every single Muslim must be moved to Pakistan and every single Hindu must be moved to India otherwise new nation will never be a stable nation which is an essential condition for progress and development. (BR Ambedkar in the book on Pakistan and Partition of India, written 7 years before actual partition. He remained supportive of this statement till the actual partition)
This is the "Populat Exchange" suggestd by Dr Ambedkar. After suggesting this, He was mocked, humiliated and forced to resign by Nehru who started harassing him and not letting him work.
There could be 100 others who could be saved, India saved some, according to deemed capacity, what is problem, this is so stupid. This is like if you could help one in need, you will not because you are not able to save other who is from another religion and not in your city. This is bullshit argument.
Wow Article 14😂😂😂
Muslims get minority status, minority ministry but It doesn't violate article 14...
How selective these leftists and wokes are...
Kabhi kabhi excess knowledge bahat harmful hota hai
Toh padai mat kar murkh banke rahna hi sahi aur koi kuch v bolega toh uspe bharosa kar lena!
🎉 le chana khaa
You clearly described current judges of Supreme court. They are running parallel govt under the nose of Democratically Choosen govt.
Iske paas access knowledge nahi, wrong knowledge hai.
Access knowledge is never harmful
@@learnenglishwithash5383what Nonsense
I think future of india is in danger
#stop collegium
Atheists can be Hindus
Best . Eg savarkar who is atheist non believer of God
Atheist are atheist. Who the help are you to call them Hindus?
Exaactly
Also, ath;eism an;d agnoticism are n;ot eve;n denominations.
We don't want to know what's right and what's wrong, CAA must be come into force.
All these useless discussions are happening because our justice system is slow. If we can appeal and get law ratified in a court of law, why is everyone so worried. Just go to court and ask if this is constitutional.
He forgot there are many religion specific laws in India like Waqf board act, Minority Act where ONLY 'peacefuls' get some EXTRA privileges. Hindus living in a Hindu majority country and other religious groups like Parsi, Christians, Jews do not get any extra privileges. Why is this? Why he is not talking about this?
If these rules are constitutional then why cannot Modi govt make some laws that are saving some minorities in the neighboring countries.
I can conclude that this person is the epitome of what they call as "Liberandu".
Mr Abhinav Chandrachud overlooked the historical background completely. In 1950-51 the Indian and Pakistani governments signed the so-called Nehru-Liaquat pact under which each country solemnly assured that minorities would be safe and their interests would be protected. Syama Prasad Mookerji opposed the pact saying that Pakistan cannot be trusted to keep its word but Nehru ignored him. Mookerji then resigned from the central cabinet. But history was to prove him right. Pakistan declared itself to be an Islamic state where minorities were oppressed and the situation has only worsened over the years. Bangladesh is also an Islamic country and minorities fare badly. On the other hand, the condition of minorities is much better in India and in some respects they have rights not given to majority Hindus. As for Afghanistan the minorities like Hindus, Sikhs etc had gone there from undivided India during the British rule and CAA 2019 seeks to grant citizenship rights.
Article 14 applies to equals and not to unequals. There is a great difference between the status of Muslims and non-Muslims in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan and therefore article 14 cannot be blindly applied. Mr Chandrachud spoke of atheists and agnostics. Now Jainism is strictly speaking an atheistic religion and Buddhism is fundamentally agnostic. Furthermore, atheism is not unknown among Hindus. V.D. Savarkar was an atheist.
As for cutoff dates, even our constitution has cutoff dates for vesting citizenship on certain categories of people.
As for 1987 and 2004 amendments of the Citizenship Act, they do not deal with minorities or minorities and have cut off dates.
True bruh!! He's just giving gyan cuz he's CJI'Ss son😂😂😂😂
Appreciate you countering him 👏 ...Varna left librandus think that we all are andhbhakts
Who are clapping for this guy!?
Iss desh mein pseudo-secular left librandus ki kami kaha hain 😂😂
Wonderful ! No wonder why people like him are entitled to become judges, he has the audacity to speak against the general masses of india /majority having moronic idiosyncracies which is also ostensible in the comment section!
He believes he is OSHO or a Gospel deliverer
Bhai Chai wale ko teri koi baat samaj nhi ayegi.
Uneducated pm 🎉
Bakwaas baat samajna jaroori bhi nahi hain😂😂😂 Aur wahi chawale ko Puri duniya "Boss" bolti hain...vahi chaiwala duniya ka sabse famous P.M hain...World leaders are also andhbhakt according to you pseudo-secular left librandus😂😂😂😂
This is how educated individuals speak, unlike our PM, Mr. Modi, who wouldn't even stand a chance for a single minute in front of him. This is what India needs: educated, young leaders, not uneducated 10th-grade-pass old uncles.
So you are saying that we should have included 100s of religions that are present in every corner of the world … but how many of them are present in these 3 countries… just asking..
But the question is why only these three county, why not Myanmar who have been persecuting rohingyas for so long as they made them the most persecuted minority in the world, it really shows discrimination tbh, I mean if we want to help minorities who are persecuted then why not start with them, is it because the current regime only wants people who share their faith , then muslims can also apeal to this logic to any other muslim refugees, but on a humanitarian objective stand point the most deserving candidates should be rohingya for a bill to help persecuted Minorities
Such an erudite scholar !! It's best for him as well as for us common Indians, that he leave India and go to Europe or US with his profound knowledge.
Pl read through caa law...when india was divided... Go to that history... Start ftom there.. Those who were minorities in those affected states due to partition of india.... That is the topic.. Not partition of insrael or germany... Or any. Other country. Stop talking nonsense...
He said "a theocratic state can also be secular". This arguement can and will be used by hindurashtra advocates.
Superb!
Every word of his throws light on the incapability , incompetence, and malicious intentions of the govt !
Thank you 🙏
Is Giving shelter to those childrens who escaped beasts a Malicious Intentions?
This rogue rascal is saying that bcz of someone whom he wants is left out other people who deserve also must not get the benefit.
Fantastic argument by young Abhinav C....👍 remove CAA & EVM
Please study and come. You are confused and don’t confuse the ignorants. Laws of our is for the people of our country. It won’t be written according to individual perception or world’s ideas. If you stay here better abide by it or else get out.
Why he is applying all American notions here , he is showing what his father believes
Bcz he studied in USA PHD
that's how the mature country people look like
where there are question asking guys stand and speak on behalf of other people ,on the other side banana republic of pakistan and its representatives never crossed the religious line of their islam and never raised question against religious persecution of its minorities.
bharat is still secular(not by enforcement of its origin in preamble) but by its cultural values
You have missed to mention animals like cow etc
Go and tell to your father
Who is he😅
A citizen of india who has right to put himself on priority rather than outsiders
Son of cji
Nepotism 😊
@@goldendragon7197 you can't stand in front of him in term of facts
@anonymous-ztabso❤9xw
@@anonymous-zt9xw🎉
🙏 Abhinav's Amazing speach
mein kuch nhi hu kuch khass nhi hai but mere baap dada congress se ghooska kar unke liye kaam kiye unke liye decision diye unconstitutional toh emergency bi tah pr congress humme haddi dal rhi thi nhi isiliye hum kuch bole nhi. aaj mere baap ka mere jo bi hain unke liye kaam krke toh hain toh mein unhi ke liye kaam krunga ye 3 desho mein hindus se bahut nafrat krte hain sabse zyda hindus se lekin fir bi unke liye caa nhi aane dunga madarsa gya nhi but waha ko hu ye sabit krne ke liye hinduo ko fayda na ho isliye anti caa bi bolunga by some spoiled rich brat
Jali na 😂
@@PelamPaal apni kamai ka khate kisike baap ki nhi isiliye hamari kisise jlti nhi hain teri jali na tabhi reply de rha hain
@@me_gaurav_rana andhbhakt ab CJI ko bhi congressi bolne Lage hai waah. Jo chiz unconstitutional hai wo band hogi. Modi kitne hi law na banade. Ye desh sanvidhan se chalta h or humesha rahega. Tujhe sanvidhan se taklif hai to Nepal chale ja
@@PelamPaal unpad hain kya jaake pad supreme court ke judges pr corruption charges lage hain and ye saare western culture wale elite judge leftist hain
India should start giving citizenship to people of Sindh and people of azad Kashmir,
In the future, India easily can claim of these territories 😂❤😂😂
So according to him, tomorrow if whole Pakistani decide to get into India we must give them all citizenship just because they are inside India.. irrespective of why there here right ??? .... if he is saying about equality will he support law where both civil & criminals laws are equal for everyone ???? do these people have basic understanding of what's mean by securing border of a country and how many soldiers live are wasted since the lack of a correct system and a common law ???
Many and many of his points are top to the apex. I must agree that he is lenient.
Isn't it a backdated video?
Yes.. of 2020.
Article 14 talks about providing "the state shall not deny equality before law or equal protection of law...."
CAA is not denying any citizen/resident of India any equality...rather it is providing accelerated means of citizenship after making intelligent classification for the (limited )objective of the law... that's how it needs to be interpreted...not the other way round, that somebody is being deprived of equality from India, because the law itself is directed towards the persecuted minorities of other nations and not those who are already in India!
Though, I agree with most of his points, but he talking about the scope of the law...just because the law in question is in the scope of it's rationale or cases of application limited doesn't mean that the law is unconstitutional! The law will still would remain constitutional, because all the questions this young man is raising are mostly policy prerogative of the executive, they are not arbitrary, just limited to the extent the legislature or executive wants it to be! Obviously the law could be expanded or contracted and yet it shall remain loyal to its humanitarian objectives...a law wouldn't become unconstitutional just because it is limited in it's humanitarian import and just because it ought to be most expanded in the same according to some people!...if that's the argument, we would end up opening all our borders and return to the mediveal times, when any pathan from Afghanistan could make a dash inside india!
SC must not poke its nose in policy matters explicitly placed within the constitutional domain. Yes, we do conform to due process of law, but we are fundamentally based on the doctrine of procedure established by law. SC needs to be very careful and recluse itself from adolescent judicial activism!
kaha se atte hain yaise log 😂😂😂