Not by eating from the tree of life, though. Actually, they never had the chance. Genesis 3:22 And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”
Myths not history. Cross polliniztion of religious myths. Interpretations of archeological evidence and scripts. Hypotheses, speculation. Humans are social, curious, story telling, pattern seekers. 😎😇🦉
This is just apologetics. That's the reason he started with "the Bible doesn't need proof because it's not a history book. But here's all the proof we found!" By starting it that way, when we tell him his evidence is insufficient, he can fall back on "well that's fine because it's not history so it doesn't need evidence"
Did you notice like others, he doesn’t include the animals that perished in the flood ? Just mentions all the women and children. Children . Happy are those that bash your babies against the rocks . Man conservative Republicans love that part
It's about the HISTORY of the he Bible. The patron god of Israel was just one god among a pantheon. Much like Athena is the patron goddess of Athens. Judaism came from other religions, it wasn't created in a vacuum.
Excellent presentation! Enjoyed the interpretation and stories.
Thank you for sharing your academic worx with the world... Obrigado
Great lecture ❤️🇺🇲👍🕊️
Not by eating from the tree of life, though. Actually, they never had the chance.
Genesis 3:22 And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”
Hi wassup
Elohim is actually plural El is singular
Scientific constellations stars empirical reality dictionary history
Myths not history. Cross polliniztion of religious myths. Interpretations of archeological evidence and scripts. Hypotheses, speculation. Humans are social, curious, story telling, pattern seekers. 😎😇🦉
This is a load of total bollocks
It's literally a historical narrative. Ya lost me already
He said it's book of ideas LMAO
He's a snake and probably a freemason
This is just apologetics. That's the reason he started with "the Bible doesn't need proof because it's not a history book. But here's all the proof we found!"
By starting it that way, when we tell him his evidence is insufficient, he can fall back on "well that's fine because it's not history so it doesn't need evidence"
Did you notice like others, he doesn’t include the animals that perished in the flood ? Just mentions all the women and children. Children .
Happy are those that bash your babies against the rocks . Man conservative Republicans love that part
This talks about other religions more than the Bible... stick to the main thang!
It's about the HISTORY of the he Bible. The patron god of Israel was just one god among a pantheon. Much like Athena is the patron goddess of Athens. Judaism came from other religions, it wasn't created in a vacuum.
National Geographic sucks.