Trying to distinguish these AI videos from non-AI footage feels more like trying to become lucid in a dream, noticing small imperfections that don’t quite make sense but the overall image looks good enough.
I wonder if people will start to experience lucid dreaming more readily once AI video starts to become more common and inspecting video to see if it's real or not becomes habit.
These AI videos feel eerily like dreams. It's as if our reality is a simulation and AI is giving us a hint at how our own dreams are created, maybe dreams are an earlier version of our waking reality. What if the architect introduced AI to 'plant the seed' in our mind so we could realise what our reality is on our own terms, then upon this realisation begin manipulating it like Neo does once he sees the matrix for what it is.
I have been on the internet for far too long. I should *know* that one of the first uses out of this would be porn. But, somehow, for some strange reason, it hadn't even crossed my mind, not even once.
I really do think these use games as training data. A lot of the materials, lighting, reflections and camera movements are so game-like there's no way they don't.
@@X4Alpha4X im still unsure whether this is cool, scary or both because of the implications and use cases of this like others have said court evidence and this might even rise to the level where experts are unsure of if a video is ai or real and this could mean innocent people being locked up or guilty people having charges dropped
@@X4Alpha4X Why do you think it will move exponentially? A lot of our tech we done before has hit a plateau at some point in time and im not sure this will be any different (Unless we somehow manage to actually make a real AGI before hitting that plateau)
This technology will do great things to reduce the work needed for video production. Surely all the money saved from the decreased labor costs will go to the people who need it and not the employers who will use it to replace jobs.
@@doofmoney3954 So the C-suite? They create the most value for the shareholders, that's the only "value created for others" that matters in our world nowadays.
@@Val-bx6gn I ask you, by what means does does the people’s money get transfered into the corporations bank accounts that then gets distributed to the shareholders. Don’t be afraid of economic thought it is not complicated
i dont particularly enjoy the thought of ai generated things, like, ai court "evidence" being presented, or ai "proof" screenshots sent online, etc. like that fake cctv footage of the dipshits with big hats or shoes or whatever.
What worries me the most is the huge number of people who are not aware of all this technology and won't think twice about sharing some fake news, as harmless as it may end up being (hopefully). I just know that there will be lots of commotion around some AI-generated video, and people will have to clarify that it's AI over and over again. That stresses me out so much for some reason.
Yeah the amount of images and posts I've seen older people and relatives share on social media like Facebook, without realising it's AI generated, is worrying
Exactly, this is an apocalyptic level misinformation generator, just think an AI generated security camera video of this quality of someone stuffing a ballot box being released after a contentious election where a fascist losses narrowly, what destruction could that cause. A concerning number of people believe the 2020 election was stolen wish literally no evidence, imagine how much worse the problem will be in 2024 with this hanging around
A few years back a vfx hobbiest from Mexico put out a video of a ring of fire circling Jerusalem during the blowing of ram horns on Rosh Hashona and had christians on youtube in a tizzy. These people actually thought it was real. Its not just viral news clips, if you can grab people by their core beliefs you could set off some kind of jihad.
Oliver Stone produced a miniseries in the 90s titled "Wild Palms" about a future govt using virtual reality to create a psuedo state religion. It was pretty much dismissed at the time but with what we have now its pretty scary.
Forget individuals, how about corporations, I can already remember the BBC and ITV using arma footage presenting it as authentic 1988 IRA footage, or live footage from the war in libya. If it was happening over a decade ago, the fidelity of AI will make it impossible to trust anything digital ever again
We need to train the masses extensively to ignore any and all information unless it's from a trusted, verifiable source. Like the days of old where you didn't know what was real until a newspaper/TV news channel/radio verified it. There's already MILLIONS of people making batshit choices in their lives based off internet knowledge that has zero backing in truth.
Imagine AI generated user dat mimicry our account, & close-enough personality in conveying opinions & typing words. Wat's sinister bout this is dat our virtual-doppelganger could use our personal security data to do some sinister shit. At this exponential rate of improvement, privacy could only be done when we're offline & offgrid. Hopefully cybersecurity will be exponentially foolproof on the same rate too.
there is something solipsistic about all of this. like, if this is AI generating within my limited lifetime, then what else within my life is not real? maybe all of my life is just an ai generated morph which has an ai generated fractal morph within it.
These videos, while a lot more convincing than before, still feels so uneasy. Like you can watch it and know it's AI, but you can't articulate why. It's like watching a dream, things constantly shifting or changing in minor ways, but you don't begin to notice until you're actually aware of what's happening.
I think dream-like is what you are thinking of. I'd definitely describe these early/modern ai videos as dream-like content. It *almost* looks real, but there is enough oddities to where you can kind of make out its ai. For example in the driving video, you can see some of the hills appearing almost flat like they were far away textures seen up close. Or when you see walkways or colors to not 100% line up. On one hand, this kind of stuff can certainly be scary given it can potentially be used to incriminate innocent people or fabricate crimes altogether, but on the other hand I do find these videos to be endlessly fascinating because they almost blur the line between animation and real life in a way I have never seen before.
Yeah, the chair on the beach really gives me the feeling of transitions in dreams. Like, one moment you're running from a wave on the beach, but the beach is also somehow your living room.
I can usually tell AI generated content from non ai image generated content, but these ones are honestly really hard to tell for me. The only weird thing that has stayed though that makes it so obvious to me, is an extremely uncomfortable feeling, like I genuinely felt like grossed out watching this. Sort of like the reaction you have to pictures of spiders or what not if you have arachnophobia. I think it may be related to my really strong trypophobia, the fear of many small holes.
@@GregorianMG More than that, like when I see the artifacts it creates in the videos, of random limbs and what not, it makes me feel grossed out. I'm fine with seeing videos of contortionists and horror movies, but there's something about the ai generated videos I just cant stand.
The video with the chairs morphing into existence gives me dread and i do not know why, its like in my head this scene *LOOKS* correct, but things that arent correct are happening and it weirds me the fuck out
*OBJECTION! THIS DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPH HAS NULL META-DATA FROM THE CANON CAMERA THE WITNESS HANDED TO ME NOT 1 MINUTE AGO* *....And the subject in the photo has like, 7 thumbs*
I just want more free money, AI will cut costs so much that it would be a CRIME against humanity if the Government did not tax these companies and redistribute back to employers within industries at highest risk of AI replacement
I'd say this is just a tool to start. AI won't replace all these jobs in the next few years. And indie developers, well - there's a development process required, so it won't be replaced.
@hckr_ There’s no question it is entirely possible to have short films done by the end of this year or by the end of 2025. Full on Hollywood level is not far away either and so are games
@@hckr_ Sure makes these jobs depressing. I want to be an artist, not a glorified proofreader who just corrects little mistakes in some ai-gen content. It's sad that traditional art, where a person with one coherent vision takes it into realization, wont be economically viable in the future.
@@letsexplodetogether5667 the AI can write it's own prompt. You won't be proof reading it. They will just bring back the 5 star rating so all you will have to do would be rating the "film" you just watched so the ai can better know how to entertain humans.
I'm slowly developing AI-phobia. Not the fear of AI taking over but it's this unsettling feeling I get from AI content. It's strange. The dogs appearing out of no where but it seems just almost right enough for it to fall deep into the uncanney valley.
If it's any consolation, we're constantly one sufficiently powerful solar flare away from the complete destruction of modern technology and anything relying on electricity.
This completes the utter flood of useless or even harmful information AI Generation has brought. Googling stuff has already become much worse and now everything I see on the internet could be generated. Information will be much harder to manage, find and be trustworthy. I think I'm probably still under shock, but it really feels like the benefits do not in the slightest outweigh the negatives with this tech. It needs to be heavily regulated imo. Also there is just the general horror of nothing being human anymore and that they just do as they please with no regard to copyright and even get away with it. Good video on your side, existential horror is just way to big on this one
Yup . People should be alarmed about dead internet Im already wary of articles and comments I like terence mckenna lectures a lot and recently there have been some AI voice videos of him released on youtube, so now I can’t listen to terence mckenna without the possibility of it being an AI voice
Well there is allways Reallife to return to, if internet gets overrun by AI. We still got some time left where we at least can trust our fellow humans to not be robots. Lets cherish that.
Their research "paper" is now published... While not disclosing the interesting bits - they make some hints. Like treating time as happening in parallel ... so you can semantically keep it. we perceive video in timed order - this model does not. GPT models also don't, they see all text at once, all the time... maybe keeping that in mind helps you get it? Their training data seems to be stock footage and game engine clips (they also cited some of the crazy style transfer papers, like the GTA one a while ago). So yes... likely did that. Framerate in general seems really odd - it's off real time, so your brain doesn't pick up on the awkward motion. give it 3 weeks for an open source model?
A lot of stock footage is in slow motion, and it may have been trained on a mix of realtime and slow motion footage, creating that mix of speeds in the same shot.
@@MFKittenseems likely. But if they didn't discrete this as patches all the way, you might be able to sample the model at any "timestep". will be interesting if they ever share more. Like the specific architecture.
That is actually terrifying. I remember looking at the early Dall-E images and thinking that it would take at least another 4 or 5 years for the PICTURES to become this realistic. The fact that it took just 2 years for videos to become this good is making me a lot more anxious about the future of this technology.
Once the Will Smith spaghetti thing came out, it was only a matter of months before some big company scrapes enough video to train a good diffusion model.
AI is scary. It feels like every month we're getting past points of no return. AI images keep getting better and better and now entire videos. And what's stopping this from bots, fake videos and images drowning out the internet, taking up bandwith and space? We've already seen Google and twitter deleting old accounts. I fear if in a decade or two I'll no longer have access to things I held dear or have very fond memories of and that's a bit depressing.
Bro if you think this is scary, try asking it to generate something scary too. Try asking it to make a video of "a mutant-monster cross of a man and a wild hog, with sparkly skin, kicking in the front door to my dimly lit wooden home, before it devours my children, tearing them apart bit by bit; high realism; realistic gore and disembodiment; power is out." Imagine when they instead of that driving game, make a horror game rendered by AI.
No this is scary in the sense that technology has advanced beyond our comprehension, and now more jobs are at risk than ever before cuz a bunch of fat cats want to get rich in Silicon Valley@@TheMrTape
@@beardalaxy This is unironically just what dreams are. A bunch of generated visuals (and plot lines) morphing into each other at worst and an incredible illusion at best. I remember having a very clear lucid dream where I though to myself: If I am going really close to this wall there isn't going to be a grain and I will see that this is not real. I did it and the most sharp grain appeared infront of me as if I was wide awake looking at a real wall. It was incredible. The complete opposite of being disillusioned.
Ive gotta say as someone who has recently been getting into 3d modeling and animation this is really terrifying and disheartening. working with ai doesn't feel like Ive made anything and it really sucks that in two years time someone can just type two sentences into a prompt and it'll look better than anything i made. not to mention i can say goodbye to making a living off making art i enjoy
If you enjoy making art, you should be able to still enjoy making it even if you can't make money off of it. If you can't, then what you actually enjoy is making money.
@@ForOne814 I feel like that is dishonest, I believe it is an individuals right to make a living of off what they provide. That is like saying to a chef, "bro if you like cooking so much do it for free if you truly love it"
I feel like if AI is ever applied to 3D modelling it'll be extremely inefficient, like 10000 faces just for one flat surface. That could probably be solved somewhat with the decimate modifier in Blender but I still think for video games at least the end result will never be as good as a human's work. The dataset for 3D models would be a lot smaller as well, leading to even worse results. There is plenty of video and images on the internet
Pretty much all these videos share one consistent problem: The speed at which the motion happens doesn't make sense. One person is consistent with themselves, but the moment you start comparing them it's clear they aren't matching each other. It gives this a very uncanny vibe that I suspect most people would feel but not be able to pinpoint.
5:15 "in a few short years we'll probably be ready to replace all the people working on CGI in movies as well" Perfectly encapsulates the conversation going around right now for those of us in the VFX industry. Our jobs are safe for now but this is all incredibly scary with how fast things are progressing. We're all hoping that art created by actual humans will remain higher quality and higher value, but only time will tell. If audiences will pay for shows and movies using raw AI generated content it might be the end of art, creativity and entertainment as we know it. And you know the same thing will happen to so many other industries too. We have some very existential questions to tackle as a society.
It wont be the end of creativity because people will be able to use AI to be creative. Actually they will be able to be more creative because they will focus on the concept rather than on trying to achieve their vision. It's a disaster for people whose job is to do the VFX but for creativity it will be a boon.. Though content mills will rake in even more money I think good content will keep standing out from the mass.
this is a bit off topic of video and images but, i would pay for voice dub, for example AI already dubbed skyrim in brazilian portugues, the people in brazil that do dub did not do it, nor the official company hired then to do it the game officialy don't have voice in brazilian portuguese. so for me DUB could be replaced already, as they only do stuff when they get paid for, and the ai could do it for any game i want. sure the skyrim voice DUB is a bit bad, but belive it or not some official dub with real humans are worse. dead risign 4 brazilian dub and the mortal kombat x brazilian dub are worse than the AI generated one for skyrim, so humans already did WORSE job than the ai did, so comparing the ai to the WORSE human for voice dub its already better. again if the company don't want pay and the people that work making voice don't want make it for free/fan service the ai will and i rather pay the ai that can do all the games i want than wait the humans take forever and sometimes be worse. if the crap humans don't want dub the games i like the ai will. so for dub in games and movie i would pay for it for sure i rather pay the ai then the humans because im pretty sure the humans would take forever to dub all the games i want, and the ai could do it very quick.
@@GoldenBoy.17 The problem with this as of now is that AI still has a mind of it's own, perfectly demonstrated with the failed examples in this video even. You can generate something close to what you're describing in most cases (but not all cases), and if you at that point want to change specific things or details in the generated results you're pretty much screwed. This has been the case with every AI generation tool thus far and it's exactly the reason why we still need to go in and fix or entirely recreate the results in CGI to have full control. You can also very easily argue that current AI systems aren't actually creative, because it can never generate anything beyond the material it's been trained on. So in that sense, new ideas will die unless actual humans take the time to create them. It's either that or AI systems has to change on a fundamental level. In either case, my point still stands - it will at the very least be the end of creativity as we know it. Anything that comes after will be something else.
@@gabrielandy9272 I totally see your point and I guess this example would be a lesser evil - you're taking something that already exists (an English voice actor for example) and adding accessibility to it for missing languages. More accessibility in general is of course a good thing, and I'm sure the AI can get pretty damn good at translations. That said, my opinion is we'll still be missing something by excluding the Brazilian voice actors from the equation. They (the good ones anyway) would bring their own unique voice and emotion to the performance that an AI can never truly replace. This is especially true if we start talking about generating voice acting from scratch, so not just translating existing material but generating it from nothing. Which would naturally be the next step if this becomes the norm. The bigger problem here is every person we're talking about replacing, is another person struggling to put food on the table. This is the existential issue we need to solve as a society.
It truly does suck to see this technology advance so fast without regulation. Unfortunately, the people in charge aren't passionate creatives. Rather, they're greedy businessmen who only think in money, and ai generated content is one hell of a money saver.
As cool as it is that an ai was able to generate this sort of stuff, it's kinda really bad for humanity. We already struggle with misinformation online and this will only make things 10 times worse. Feels like we are approaching a point where everything we see could possibly be fake, with no way of knowing if that's the case.
nah it's just a moral panic like any other tech advance. people thought that radio, TV, jazz music, rock music, and many other new and scary things were going to ruin the fabric of society
because that’s just a toxic mentality people have created. if I were to show you one of these examples and say it was human made it would be fine. As soon as I say it’s AI generated it’s “bland, uncanny, unease, etc.” People have developed pure toxicity mindsets to AI
I wonder if it will be possible to intentionally generate videos styled after the "AI failures". They're absurd, mind-bending, and hilarious. Especially the video at 3:29
Yes, the artifacts are caused by insufficient compute capabilities. The more powerful the computer driving Sora AI is the more stable and realistic the output video is.
@@VariantAEC The thing is, lowering the compute power not only makes the video more surreal but also makes it notably less detailed. Two Minute Papers very recently published a video on Sora AI that demonstrated this effect. The chair video is very weird and bizarre, yes, but it's still very detailed and cohesive.
yeah its interesting how the chair floats around and actually gouges lines in the sand as it floats about, its like looking at a physics bug in real life@@mr.awesomesauce8412
With the power of AI we could do away with menial labor and allow humanity to pursue science and arts. But instead we're going to try and replace artists because cyberpunk dystopia is the hottest new trend apparently. AI revolution has a long way to go, but it's going to get there.
Seems like a decade ago I talked with a friend how I thought we would eventually be able to give a computer a concept for a movie and it would generate it. Never did I imagine that it would be this realistic this soon, not quite there but scarily close.
I really liked AI images before the internet was flooded with them like a septic tank overflow, but this shit... this is scary as fuck. I mean, on one hand, it's kind of cool, but... It's so accessible and it's gonna be a miasma of horrors for awhile. I think.
I suspect they have had this technology for a long long time and have been refining it and are now rolling it out as though its all new, the pace of advancement is far too quick to be natural progression, never seen anything like this in the technology field.
@@maccagrabme We went from no planes, to jets in 30 years, and then to the moon in another 20. PS1 to PS3 was barely 15 years, if that. If anything it's proof that tech evolution time keeps getting smaller.
Given the generally low quality and bad resolution of security camera footage, it might be easier than ever to fake it and use it as false proof in fraudulent insurance claims and criminal cases
The times that the AI gets things wrong like the chair floating is much more interesting to me than when it gets things right. We can create some next level trippy videos with this technology
Spot the difference on the water reflection on the ground, not at the same frame rate, rendering is off. Especially the blue reflection near the yellow one. 1:05
I think one of the main ways to figure out if a video is AI generated or not is to look for inconsistencies once something goes out of frame. If you check the "Tokyo walk" video in the original Sora article, you'll notice that once the lady passes in front of the blue sign, there's a tiny, subtle difference of the placement once it shows up again
At the clip around 1:20, I'm not seeing her cheekbones doing anything strange. The chin might appear to grow due to the camera position as she looks right and shows more of a profile. Yeah, it's an odd appearance for a woman never mind a woman of Asian descent, but it doesn't appear that her chin changed much if at all and if it did it changed back as she looks back at the camera.
Also her legs aren’t walking right. Also it’s obvious that this thing isn’t intelligent, it’s just trained off of datasets of existing work. People are acting like it authored everything from scratch , yet all it does it sample pixels and information and approximate it. It just got better at approximation techniques IMO.
This stuff makes me want to (redacted) Sam Altman and everyone who helped make it. Stuff like this isn’t just a negative for society, it’s literally an apocalyptic misinformation generator, some real MGS2 shit
The point he makes at the end is why I have been saying for years now that AI will be the downfall of humanity, no matter how many videos I see, and how "cool" it is, and the actual good uses of AI like nvidia is doing with games. I just can't get over the fact that this technology has infintie ways of ruining the world, and everything its doing we already had jobs for. The downsides outweight the upsides a million to one and developers dont seem to care
This was fascinating, especially on a ultratall display, it was so shocking that I farted, thankfully it aired out as I have a mesh chair, which I found funny, as an American.
I farted too. That was so loud cause my chair is metal so it served as amplifier. I almost went deaf for a moment but it smells of filet mignon with onions so it was worth it.
So weird that we're all just okay with kids watching crap quality videos. Surely kids should get to see the prettiest animations, most touching stories, things that teach them the most in a fun way. It's building their visual and mental library so why feed them the worst content?
Wow! Sora was announced in the evening! You're super reactive :-) To be honest, the simple idea that I'll no longer be able to say if what I'm watching is real or not, really happened or not, makes me kind of sad, even if the content is harmless. I feel that some of the magic behind the internet is about to break, but I'm not really sure what it is. It will definitely change the way I perceive and watch content, that's for sure.
I'm equally terrified, but laws won't help much. Take the current state of ransom software for instance: It's illegal to extort others, but countries like Russia won't prosecute you, as long as you're harming the west - not to mention the intentional amount of disinformation state sponsored AI from Russia could have. We're about to enter a whole new era of the (dis-) information age
This stuff is open source, its not like some tech behind locked doors And say EU bans it, what's stopping some scammers from India or China to abuse the tech
But how will the laws even control this? You dont need expensive special equipment. Just a decent PC and a software that has been written and to a certain extend distributed. Even with laws, the police cannot even be sure its AI if they know they dont know who did it and if they knew not always arrest/fine the person.
for now i have a very good and consistent way of differenciating the ai vids from the real ones: my head. my head actually starts to hurt when looking at sora generated videos
there is a lack of a soul behind the faces in these videos which creeps me out and the morphing of before has gotten very very very subtle it does make me fearful for the future
I'm just thinking of all the jobs that are going to be replaced by this technology. What is everyone going to do? Pretty soon, we won't need 90% of the jobs in anything related to videography, graphic design, photography... Even the engineering jobs aren't safe from AI dominance; there is a lot happening in the background that people don't know about. I wish AI was not possible, but it is, and it seems like it's going to mess up the general feeling of "purpose" in life. What the hell is everyone going to do?
Exactly. But you have to remember that this is different from previous automation. This time, an engineer didn't invent a new clever machine to do some process, they designed a machine to IMITATE things. And to imitate, they need to use an unimaginably huge amount of work people have made and released. They do not actually have a machine capable of drawing, writing or making videos if we make the laws so that anybody can't just hoover up all information we as a collective have released just to make profit and replace us.
Only things left will be manual labor and when thats gone nothing rly elites and robots wont have a need for most people anymore so will probably be left for dead
I really do think these use games as training data. A lot of the materials, lighting, reflections and camera movements are so game-like there's no way they don't. The Tokyo scene is jittery like a video game, and its lighting seems to have the exact shortcomings of traditional rendering techniques.
too early to be cruising in space, too late to be financially stable in the economy, but just in time for the Ai generated slop surge what a time to be alive
this horrorshow of AI development will soon be resolved, but unfortunately I will never forget the nightmare fuel that is will smith gobbling down endless forkfulls of spaghetti
If you want to cut costs these “tools” cut people and it will inevitably do so sooner than later. I can already see advertising agencies opting for one AI guy and another general clean up guy rather than a team of animators. AI in the creative space will always take jobs even if it just generated an aspect of a production like 3D models rather than the whole thing. 3D modellers would therefore be in less demand. AI art generation has been used in animation. Specifically backgrounds. In these cases, so far they’ve been used as a tool because it will generate an image that won’t conform with the characters, layout and that show’s style perfectly with current curation tools. But that will change. It will get to a point where the only reason against AI is the thought that personality can shine through human creativity and can’t be faithfully replicated. But with future curation tools for these AI, I anticipate that idea will proven void. There is no moral argument for justifying how these “tools” were created off the work of those they will harm. A layman doesn’t care. But as an artist and animator, I do.
My moral argument is that whatever is running this stuff will eventually be able to cure all diseases so it’s a necessary evil in a sense to get to that point
I thought that the footage of the cat and the woman in bed was real. But when it was shown again at the end of the video, I realised that wasn’t Philips cat, and I just found it scary that I thought it was real
@3:07 the stairs on the lower left hand corner just ate those people! maybe my efforts in trying to find errors with each video are just my thinly veiled attempts at trying to delegitimize this scary new tool to comfort myself
@@matheussanthiago9685 in 10 months, top gun maverick level A.I videos will come, you don’t need real jets to shoot! which is sad, we are all gonna be replaced, becoming 1st in Harvard means nothing, any A.I can do your work, being the best hacker means nothing, A.I will do better…. only athletes and performers will survive, people still love human vs human chess.
Faces are basically the #1 thing that AI researchers have the most complete datasets to train on. Convincing looking face generators already existed before the early text-to-image tools caught on.
This is terrifying. People WILL probably go to prison because of these used as evidence. If not because of openAI, then because anotehr company. Reputations can be ruined because of one fake video. Too much media and internet illiteracy causes people to take things at face value (myself included at times). Truly some nightmare fuel. It seems OpenAI is advancing tech and ignoring the consequences and human factor in all of this.
For me, the “errors” or “mistakes”, like the sand chair and the puppy producer, is where Ai introduces a new kind of digital creativity. I like seeing the dreamlike, uncanny, counter intuitive distortions of reality that AI can produce
Rip advertising videos, journalism copyright videos, music videos. Soon, Rip painters, sculptors, music composers, singers, chefs, instrumentalists, coders.....traders. After that Rip everyone Only AI.
I cannot watch this video. I watched the first 10 seconds and I got an intense chill down my spine. This is extremely uncanny for me and I just cannot watch these AI videos without getting extreme chills. I don't know why but these videos terrify me like nothing I've seen before.
2:59 this also happens with reflections (in the lady walking in Japan clip). My guess is, the training data included clips of videogames, where the reflections are often rendered with a lower framerate to reduce the performance impact; could that be it?
These videos are the closest I've seen to accurately visualize what's it like to be in a dream. Stuff not making sense, breaking laws of physics, only seeming to be real for a moment until you think about it, even something about the way the "camera" moves and is set up that's very dream-like.
I like how the company making this technology has a "safety policy." That's hilarious. It reminds me of people who actually believe robots could never hurt humans because Isaac Asimov wrote in his 1942 short story "Runaround" that "the first law [of Robotics is that] a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm." Like, that's great and all, but it was just a short story, not the laws of physics. Their lack of imagination astounds me. "Robots can't hurt us because I said so" has such similar vibes to "our AI won't be a problem because we wrote some safety guidelines." Sure, bud, good work lol.
![ลองสั่งของจากแอพ temu ถูกจริงหรอ?? [โกงไหมครับ ep.88 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RTcZSQTiDZw/mqdefault.jpg)
Trying to distinguish these AI videos from non-AI footage feels more like trying to become lucid in a dream, noticing small imperfections that don’t quite make sense but the overall image looks good enough.
I wonder if people will start to experience lucid dreaming more readily once AI video starts to become more common and inspecting video to see if it's real or not becomes habit.
It seems to be based on enhancing 3d renders. So pretty much the same rules apply.
These AI videos feel eerily like dreams. It's as if our reality is a simulation and AI is giving us a hint at how our own dreams are created, maybe dreams are an earlier version of our waking reality. What if the architect introduced AI to 'plant the seed' in our mind so we could realise what our reality is on our own terms, then upon this realisation begin manipulating it like Neo does once he sees the matrix for what it is.
Great analogy- it gave me chills!
@@ZeroRelevanceDon't inspect reality too closely though. You don't want to wake up yet.
we're so f*cking cooked man
ai made me quit 3d this video only reinforces that was the right call
@@joelt7869 I quit 3d when the first version of dall.e was released, yeah our calls were right sadly, my mate.
@@joelt7869 that's a shame
@@mcbaws21In two years i get to make video games without modeling or coding anything *evil laugh*
with this technology i swear in 5 years degenerates will make porn of their crush using only a few pictures of their face
In around 20 seconds AI porn will take over the world
It took 30, but you were basically right.
I have been on the internet for far too long. I should *know* that one of the first uses out of this would be porn. But, somehow, for some strange reason, it hadn't even crossed my mind, not even once.
If Taylor swift got pissed over nude photos she's gonna flip over what degens will produce.
Tyler swift round 2
There's already a bunch of celebrity deepfake porn going around
Dirt 2 uses real tracks. The video could just be using footage from the same track as part of the training data.
Irl third person driving footage?
uh yeah, you can stick an action camera on a mount and composite it out in post
I really do think these use games as training data. A lot of the materials, lighting, reflections and camera movements are so game-like there's no way they don't.
@@kasperkata read the comment again.
@@kasperkata they did use it, they advertise game footage generation as a feature lol
i remember the dalle ai image gen and i thought it would be at least another 20+ years to get to this level, this is absolutely bonkers
nah this kind of stuff moves exponentially. i fully expect we have 100% ai generated movies, with full voice and semi coherent plots in about 2-3yrs
@@X4Alpha4X im still unsure whether this is cool, scary or both because of the implications and use cases of this like others have said court evidence and this might even rise to the level where experts are unsure of if a video is ai or real and this could mean innocent people being locked up or guilty people having charges dropped
@@X4Alpha4X We're pretty much there
AI beating hollywood level movies or being at Hollywood level is like 2025-2026. Short films are entirely possible by end of this year or end of 2025
@@X4Alpha4X Why do you think it will move exponentially? A lot of our tech we done before has hit a plateau at some point in time and im not sure this will be any different (Unless we somehow manage to actually make a real AGI before hitting that plateau)
This technology will do great things to reduce the work needed for video production. Surely all the money saved from the decreased labor costs will go to the people who need it and not the employers who will use it to replace jobs.
I was about to chew you out lmao
It will go to those who create value for others mostly
@@doofmoney3954 So the C-suite? They create the most value for the shareholders, that's the only "value created for others" that matters in our world nowadays.
@@Val-bx6gn I ask you, by what means does does the people’s money get transfered into the corporations bank accounts that then gets distributed to the shareholders.
Don’t be afraid of economic thought it is not complicated
@@doofmoney3954 brother they're gonna use this to replace the people doing the actual labour
i dont particularly enjoy the thought of ai generated things, like, ai court "evidence" being presented, or ai "proof" screenshots sent online, etc. like that fake cctv footage of the dipshits with big hats or shoes or whatever.
I feel like it should be easy enough to fake a screenshot with no AI involvement
@@hypsin0but with ai. People with no skill with Photoshop and that sort of stuff can now create anything. So more people can fake stuff.
AI imagery is already being used to downplay evidence.
@@gamergrids Oh well. The world will have to adjust. Proof would mean idempotent, unchangeable evidence, rather than just pictures of things.
so? dont trust anything unless you trust the source. we are just going back to before the times of the camera.
What worries me the most is the huge number of people who are not aware of all this technology and won't think twice about sharing some fake news, as harmless as it may end up being (hopefully). I just know that there will be lots of commotion around some AI-generated video, and people will have to clarify that it's AI over and over again. That stresses me out so much for some reason.
Yeah the amount of images and posts I've seen older people and relatives share on social media like Facebook, without realising it's AI generated, is worrying
Exactly, this is an apocalyptic level misinformation generator, just think an AI generated security camera video of this quality of someone stuffing a ballot box being released after a contentious election where a fascist losses narrowly, what destruction could that cause.
A concerning number of people believe the 2020 election was stolen wish literally no evidence, imagine how much worse the problem will be in 2024 with this hanging around
A few years back a vfx hobbiest from Mexico put out a video of a ring of fire circling Jerusalem during the blowing of ram horns on Rosh Hashona and had christians on youtube in a tizzy.
These people actually thought it was real. Its not just viral news clips, if you can grab people by their core beliefs you could set off some kind of jihad.
Oliver Stone produced a miniseries in the 90s titled "Wild Palms" about a future govt using virtual reality to create a psuedo state religion. It was pretty much dismissed at the time but with what we have now its pretty scary.
Forget individuals, how about corporations, I can already remember the BBC and ITV using arma footage presenting it as authentic 1988 IRA footage, or live footage from the war in libya. If it was happening over a decade ago, the fidelity of AI will make it impossible to trust anything digital ever again
3:16 Do they call a treadmill a conveyor belt over the pond because if they do that's insanity
no we call it a treadmill too i was suprised by conveyor belt too lmao
clearly too much gaming and not enough gym
over the pond is just as good as island apes hhahaha
Philip at it again using AI scripts. Probably.
Obviously evidence that philip is just AI generated
The dead internet theory is gonna prove more and more true every day when botnets start making AI generated videos of events that never happened.
We need to train the masses extensively to ignore any and all information unless it's from a trusted, verifiable source. Like the days of old where you didn't know what was real until a newspaper/TV news channel/radio verified it. There's already MILLIONS of people making batshit choices in their lives based off internet knowledge that has zero backing in truth.
@@ishaan863 there are no trusted, verifiable sources. That's just the government propaganda.
Imagine AI generated user dat mimicry our account, & close-enough personality in conveying opinions & typing words. Wat's sinister bout this is dat our virtual-doppelganger could use our personal security data to do some sinister shit. At this exponential rate of improvement, privacy could only be done when we're offline & offgrid.
Hopefully cybersecurity will be exponentially foolproof on the same rate too.
Takes a lot more processing power to generate high resolution video files than plain text or even images. Would be incomparably harder.
there is something solipsistic about all of this. like, if this is AI generating within my limited lifetime, then what else within my life is not real? maybe all of my life is just an ai generated morph which has an ai generated fractal morph within it.
These videos, while a lot more convincing than before, still feels so uneasy. Like you can watch it and know it's AI, but you can't articulate why. It's like watching a dream, things constantly shifting or changing in minor ways, but you don't begin to notice until you're actually aware of what's happening.
It kinda looks like it sorta morphs from image to image.
I think dream-like is what you are thinking of.
I'd definitely describe these early/modern ai videos as dream-like content. It *almost* looks real, but there is enough oddities to where you can kind of make out its ai. For example in the driving video, you can see some of the hills appearing almost flat like they were far away textures seen up close. Or when you see walkways or colors to not 100% line up.
On one hand, this kind of stuff can certainly be scary given it can potentially be used to incriminate innocent people or fabricate crimes altogether, but on the other hand I do find these videos to be endlessly fascinating because they almost blur the line between animation and real life in a way I have never seen before.
It's honestly terrifying to watch, I feel like I'm watching an actual cognitohazard
I don't know, the girl in the train or the Japanese couple really don't feel like AI to me, I couldn't have noticed
Yeah, the chair on the beach really gives me the feeling of transitions in dreams. Like, one moment you're running from a wave on the beach, but the beach is also somehow your living room.
I can usually tell AI generated content from non ai image generated content, but these ones are honestly really hard to tell for me. The only weird thing that has stayed though that makes it so obvious to me, is an extremely uncomfortable feeling, like I genuinely felt like grossed out watching this. Sort of like the reaction you have to pictures of spiders or what not if you have arachnophobia. I think it may be related to my really strong trypophobia, the fear of many small holes.
So it kind of triggering an uncanny valley effect on you, I suppose?
@@GregorianMGyes, me too
@@GregorianMG More than that, like when I see the artifacts it creates in the videos, of random limbs and what not, it makes me feel grossed out. I'm fine with seeing videos of contortionists and horror movies, but there's something about the ai generated videos I just cant stand.
The video with the chairs morphing into existence gives me dread and i do not know why, its like in my head this scene *LOOKS* correct, but things that arent correct are happening and it weirds me the fuck out
I think it's because of the music 2kliks put up on this
"In the future, entertainment will be randomly generated"
"What happend to 'it's funny because it's true'?"
@@alfonshedstrom9859 "It's funny because the randomly generated thing is true!"
Today is the furure
W E E D E A T E R
cant wait for the ace attorney game where you have to look at ai generated camera footage and have to point out the inconsistencies
*OBJECTION! THIS DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPH HAS NULL META-DATA FROM THE CANON CAMERA THE WITNESS HANDED TO ME NOT 1 MINUTE AGO*
*....And the subject in the photo has like, 7 thumbs*
With the rise of AI, I expect more bloat videos with no effort to be uploaded on TH-cam and ruin my experience
You will watch the content You will enjoy the slop
"dream-like state" is a great way to describe it. These feel just real enough but weird enough to be memories of past dreams.
I've been lucid dreaming for years and yeah, it feels exactly like that.
this is straight up terrifying
I just want more free money, AI will cut costs so much that it would be a CRIME against humanity if the Government did not tax these companies and redistribute back to employers within industries at highest risk of AI replacement
@@IrishIwasJewishreplacement of geneating images and videos?
@@siinxx7656 Animations, movies, shows, etc. Use your head
@@IrishIwasJewish hahhahahahaha
I found it terrifying too, until I realized, Just lets have fun, if we think negatively we will be consumed by these AI's
This is scary for people starting out in creative endeavours. Be it content creators , illustrators , vfx artists, indie game dev and so on.
I'd say this is just a tool to start. AI won't replace all these jobs in the next few years. And indie developers, well - there's a development process required, so it won't be replaced.
@hckr_ There’s no question it is entirely possible to have short films done by the end of this year or by the end of 2025. Full on Hollywood level is not far away either and so are games
The tool that does the work for you lmaoo@@hckr_
@@hckr_
Sure makes these jobs depressing.
I want to be an artist, not a glorified proofreader who just corrects little mistakes in some ai-gen content.
It's sad that traditional art, where a person with one coherent vision takes it into realization, wont be economically viable in the future.
@@letsexplodetogether5667 the AI can write it's own prompt. You won't be proof reading it. They will just bring back the 5 star rating so all you will have to do would be rating the "film" you just watched so the ai can better know how to entertain humans.
I'm slowly developing AI-phobia. Not the fear of AI taking over but it's this unsettling feeling I get from AI content. It's strange. The dogs appearing out of no where but it seems just almost right enough for it to fall deep into the uncanney valley.
keep reminding yourself that its not real
Same. Ever since I saw those deep dream images back in 2012 I was horrified of what ai could do
If it's any consolation, we're constantly one sufficiently powerful solar flare away from the complete destruction of modern technology and anything relying on electricity.
This completes the utter flood of useless or even harmful information AI Generation has brought. Googling stuff has already become much worse and now everything I see on the internet could be generated. Information will be much harder to manage, find and be trustworthy. I think I'm probably still under shock, but it really feels like the benefits do not in the slightest outweigh the negatives with this tech. It needs to be heavily regulated imo.
Also there is just the general horror of nothing being human anymore and that they just do as they please with no regard to copyright and even get away with it.
Good video on your side, existential horror is just way to big on this one
Yup . People should be alarmed about dead internet
Im already wary of articles and comments
I like terence mckenna lectures a lot and recently there have been some AI voice videos of him released on youtube, so now I can’t listen to terence mckenna without the possibility of it being an AI voice
Well there is allways Reallife to return to, if internet gets overrun by AI. We still got some time left where we at least can trust our fellow humans to not be robots. Lets cherish that.
Their research "paper" is now published...
While not disclosing the interesting bits - they make some hints. Like treating time as happening in parallel ... so you can semantically keep it. we perceive video in timed order - this model does not. GPT models also don't, they see all text at once, all the time... maybe keeping that in mind helps you get it?
Their training data seems to be stock footage and game engine clips (they also cited some of the crazy style transfer papers, like the GTA one a while ago). So yes... likely did that.
Framerate in general seems really odd - it's off real time, so your brain doesn't pick up on the awkward motion.
give it 3 weeks for an open source model?
A lot of stock footage is in slow motion, and it may have been trained on a mix of realtime and slow motion footage, creating that mix of speeds in the same shot.
@@MFKittenseems likely. But if they didn't discrete this as patches all the way, you might be able to sample the model at any "timestep". will be interesting if they ever share more. Like the specific architecture.
Kinda sounds like they made a 4th dimensional being.
the open source model is likely gonna suck and be very hardware intensive. we are lucky we got stable diffusion as early as we did
Stable Video Diffusion is also quite good and in my opinion a lot better than Runway Gen 2.
That is actually terrifying. I remember looking at the early Dall-E images and thinking that it would take at least another 4 or 5 years for the PICTURES to become this realistic. The fact that it took just 2 years for videos to become this good is making me a lot more anxious about the future of this technology.
Once the Will Smith spaghetti thing came out, it was only a matter of months before some big company scrapes enough video to train a good diffusion model.
Why did it had to be during my lifetime
Goddammit
I should've been born in the 60's and died in 2012
@matheussanthiago9685 Same
Search Perchance AI and play with it. its free
3:40 I absolutely love this new use case of your dad's song as a sting for something wild happening.
for me, the song and source engine are so related that i thought he was gonna start a segment about the ai being trained on videogames
The chair randomly levitating and then morphing killed me.
Fav part of any of his videos to be honest! I love how it seems to get louder every time.
Will smith went from the guy in Men in Black to ai spaghetti man in the span of a decade
What a fall from grace 😞
Yeah, it's a real slap in the face for an actor who was a big part of my childhood in Fresh Prince and MiB.
He also had a n moment at the oscars because someone made a joke about his cucking wife.
@@Viking_Cookie Not as real as the slap in the face at the Oscars
@@Viking_Cookie I feel so *cheated* from the things that happened to him
I do still love will smith though.I think he is a good actor.
AI is scary. It feels like every month we're getting past points of no return. AI images keep getting better and better and now entire videos. And what's stopping this from bots, fake videos and images drowning out the internet, taking up bandwith and space? We've already seen Google and twitter deleting old accounts.
I fear if in a decade or two I'll no longer have access to things I held dear or have very fond memories of and that's a bit depressing.
Start saving stuff. Downloading stuff and with storage getting cheaper, you can get a lot of it, just beware of scams.
Yup. Buy some hard drive and start backing things up.
Damn.
I dont care. I love it
@@gabrielv.4358 enjoy the constant stream of ai generated tutorials and Spiderman x Elsa porn collapsing TH-cam servers
Well, this is the new height in terrifying for AI.
Bro if you think this is scary, try asking it to generate something scary too. Try asking it to make a video of "a mutant-monster cross of a man and a wild hog, with sparkly skin, kicking in the front door to my dimly lit wooden home, before it devours my children, tearing them apart bit by bit; high realism; realistic gore and disembodiment; power is out."
Imagine when they instead of that driving game, make a horror game rendered by AI.
No this is scary in the sense that technology has advanced beyond our comprehension, and now more jobs are at risk than ever before cuz a bunch of fat cats want to get rich in Silicon Valley@@TheMrTape
Honestly I fail to see ANY positives coming out of this...
Have you considered consolidation of wealth. Every day a CEO suffers from need of one more yacht.
@@YuriMomoiro Well when you put it that way it suddenly sounds really cool, can't believe I didn't think of that earlier lmao
But have you considered that line goes up = more money = more gooder?
6:22 I think for certain videos they’ve shown they are mimicking the way people film with their phones, that’s why it feels extra real imo
The societal implications are terrifying but I do like the weird uncanny valley stuff like the morphing chair. That's not harmful and just looks cool
I hope that starts s whole genre of just weird snd strange videos. I want way more of that.
the non-euclidean, dreamlike, mc escher kind of stuff is awesome.
Those puppies casually travelling through a different dimension.
@@beardalaxy This is unironically just what dreams are. A bunch of generated visuals (and plot lines) morphing into each other at worst and an incredible illusion at best.
I remember having a very clear lucid dream where I though to myself: If I am going really close to this wall there isn't going to be a grain and I will see that this is not real. I did it and the most sharp grain appeared infront of me as if I was wide awake looking at a real wall. It was incredible. The complete opposite of being disillusioned.
Then you are wery short sighted
Ive gotta say as someone who has recently been getting into 3d modeling and animation this is really terrifying and disheartening. working with ai doesn't feel like Ive made anything and it really sucks that in two years time someone can just type two sentences into a prompt and it'll look better than anything i made. not to mention i can say goodbye to making a living off making art i enjoy
If you enjoy making art, you should be able to still enjoy making it even if you can't make money off of it. If you can't, then what you actually enjoy is making money.
@@ForOne814 You can enjoy whatever you want, but artists need money to keep the fucking lights on, and pay the bills. Eat a dick.
@@ForOne814unfortunately most people live in capitalist countries where they need money to fucking survive
@@ForOne814 I feel like that is dishonest, I believe it is an individuals right to make a living of off what they provide. That is like saying to a chef, "bro if you like cooking so much do it for free if you truly love it"
I feel like if AI is ever applied to 3D modelling it'll be extremely inefficient, like 10000 faces just for one flat surface. That could probably be solved somewhat with the decimate modifier in Blender but I still think for video games at least the end result will never be as good as a human's work. The dataset for 3D models would be a lot smaller as well, leading to even worse results. There is plenty of video and images on the internet
Pretty much all these videos share one consistent problem: The speed at which the motion happens doesn't make sense. One person is consistent with themselves, but the moment you start comparing them it's clear they aren't matching each other. It gives this a very uncanny vibe that I suspect most people would feel but not be able to pinpoint.
floaty & sliding background people
Yeah, but video generation is pretty new. Only a matter of time before those problems are sorted out.
only if it become video editing with generative AI app @@JonnyCrackers
So that's the problem. I could tell there was something wrong but I couldn't quite put my finger on what the problem is.
Man I’m already getting tons of AI generated pictures from my mom and now you’re telling me she is gonna start sending me videos too
Based
Pretty soon you won't even be able to tell if you're actually communicating with her or an AI.
@@sanseverything900lmao, is this hug real or ai generated
Ai generated funny cats
My mom sent me an image of a baby girl who was clearly Ai Generated and she didn’t even notice.
Did bro just call a treadmill a conveyer belt
factorio brain
why do people call it a mill, are you grinding wheat into flour?
we are going to find out this video is completely A.I generated
@@JackPorterbecause it's uselessly going round and round
@beenguy5887 because the board is checkered?
ALREADY?! jeez louise, i thought this level of fidelity is years away! wow... just freakin' wow...
These feel like watching someone elses memories its uncanny
Like rewatching someone else's feverdreams.
Me lying in a hospital bed:
The submitted for evidence cop with 3 arms bodycam footage definitely not shooting me:
Just have someone generate footage showing that he actually shot you with his fourth arm that couldn't be seen in his footage?
@@Viking_Cookieare you telling someone how to fake a shooting
Nevermind I misread that
I hope they make a AI tool that can identify AI videos from real ones
I hope someone makes an browser extention that FILTERS out AI content
it's way overdue at this point
Cold War: AI edition
Impossible. I need a bot that bypasses cloudfare
5:15 "in a few short years we'll probably be ready to replace all the people working on CGI in movies as well"
Perfectly encapsulates the conversation going around right now for those of us in the VFX industry. Our jobs are safe for now but this is all incredibly scary with how fast things are progressing. We're all hoping that art created by actual humans will remain higher quality and higher value, but only time will tell.
If audiences will pay for shows and movies using raw AI generated content it might be the end of art, creativity and entertainment as we know it. And you know the same thing will happen to so many other industries too. We have some very existential questions to tackle as a society.
It wont be the end of creativity because people will be able to use AI to be creative. Actually they will be able to be more creative because they will focus on the concept rather than on trying to achieve their vision. It's a disaster for people whose job is to do the VFX but for creativity it will be a boon.. Though content mills will rake in even more money I think good content will keep standing out from the mass.
this is a bit off topic of video and images but, i would pay for voice dub, for example AI already dubbed skyrim in brazilian portugues, the people in brazil that do dub did not do it, nor the official company hired then to do it the game officialy don't have voice in brazilian portuguese.
so for me DUB could be replaced already, as they only do stuff when they get paid for, and the ai could do it for any game i want.
sure the skyrim voice DUB is a bit bad, but belive it or not some official dub with real humans are worse. dead risign 4 brazilian dub and the mortal kombat x brazilian dub are worse than the AI generated one for skyrim, so humans already did WORSE job than the ai did, so comparing the ai to the WORSE human for voice dub its already better.
again if the company don't want pay and the people that work making voice don't want make it for free/fan service the ai will and i rather pay the ai that can do all the games i want than wait the humans take forever and sometimes be worse. if the crap humans don't want dub the games i like the ai will. so for dub in games and movie i would pay for it for sure i rather pay the ai then the humans because im pretty sure the humans would take forever to dub all the games i want, and the ai could do it very quick.
@@GoldenBoy.17 The problem with this as of now is that AI still has a mind of it's own, perfectly demonstrated with the failed examples in this video even. You can generate something close to what you're describing in most cases (but not all cases), and if you at that point want to change specific things or details in the generated results you're pretty much screwed. This has been the case with every AI generation tool thus far and it's exactly the reason why we still need to go in and fix or entirely recreate the results in CGI to have full control.
You can also very easily argue that current AI systems aren't actually creative, because it can never generate anything beyond the material it's been trained on. So in that sense, new ideas will die unless actual humans take the time to create them. It's either that or AI systems has to change on a fundamental level. In either case, my point still stands - it will at the very least be the end of creativity as we know it. Anything that comes after will be something else.
@@gabrielandy9272 I totally see your point and I guess this example would be a lesser evil - you're taking something that already exists (an English voice actor for example) and adding accessibility to it for missing languages. More accessibility in general is of course a good thing, and I'm sure the AI can get pretty damn good at translations.
That said, my opinion is we'll still be missing something by excluding the Brazilian voice actors from the equation. They (the good ones anyway) would bring their own unique voice and emotion to the performance that an AI can never truly replace. This is especially true if we start talking about generating voice acting from scratch, so not just translating existing material but generating it from nothing. Which would naturally be the next step if this becomes the norm.
The bigger problem here is every person we're talking about replacing, is another person struggling to put food on the table. This is the existential issue we need to solve as a society.
It truly does suck to see this technology advance so fast without regulation. Unfortunately, the people in charge aren't passionate creatives. Rather, they're greedy businessmen who only think in money, and ai generated content is one hell of a money saver.
Loved 3:10 when the two people in black get dramatically absorbed into the railings in the bottom left
As cool as it is that an ai was able to generate this sort of stuff, it's kinda really bad for humanity. We already struggle with misinformation online and this will only make things 10 times worse.
Feels like we are approaching a point where everything we see could possibly be fake, with no way of knowing if that's the case.
nah it's just a moral panic like any other tech advance. people thought that radio, TV, jazz music, rock music, and many other new and scary things were going to ruin the fabric of society
@@r99716 to be fair, if anything was going to ruin the fabric of society, it would be AI
@@r99716Jazz couldn't generate convincing footage of you commiting a crime.
@@Cyliandre441 Photoshop can
@@milandavid7223 in days, as opposed to minutes
You should start a channel called "0kliksphilip" that only has AI generated content.
AI-generated imagery is one of those things where no matter how right or wrong it looks, it still gives me a sense of unease.
because that’s just a toxic mentality people have created. if I were to show you one of these examples and say it was human made it would be fine. As soon as I say it’s AI generated it’s “bland, uncanny, unease, etc.”
People have developed pure toxicity mindsets to AI
@@ashdang23is this AI generated comment
@@snowiblind ahhh, why?
Obviously bs. We've gotten such great HQ image generators at this point u wouldn't even be able to tell its not a real photo
@@TheManinBlack9054 other guy lol
I wonder if it will be possible to intentionally generate videos styled after the "AI failures". They're absurd, mind-bending, and hilarious. Especially the video at 3:29
Yes, the artifacts are caused by insufficient compute capabilities. The more powerful the computer driving Sora AI is the more stable and realistic the output video is.
@@VariantAEC The thing is, lowering the compute power not only makes the video more surreal but also makes it notably less detailed. Two Minute Papers very recently published a video on Sora AI that demonstrated this effect. The chair video is very weird and bizarre, yes, but it's still very detailed and cohesive.
yeah its interesting how the chair floats around and actually gouges lines in the sand as it floats about, its like looking at a physics bug in real life@@mr.awesomesauce8412
At 6:53 when I saw that clip in latest MKBHD video about this topic I thought “Oh, that’s Philip, it’s so freaking weird”😅
I thought it is him. I mean AI generated based on him. Is it not?
With the power of AI we could do away with menial labor and allow humanity to pursue science and arts. But instead we're going to try and replace artists because cyberpunk dystopia is the hottest new trend apparently. AI revolution has a long way to go, but it's going to get there.
Seems like a decade ago I talked with a friend how I thought we would eventually be able to give a computer a concept for a movie and it would generate it. Never did I imagine that it would be this realistic this soon, not quite there but scarily close.
i watched like 4 videos about it that night and i need more.
and i love that you put link to will smith in description
I really liked AI images before the internet was flooded with them like a septic tank overflow, but this shit... this is scary as fuck. I mean, on one hand, it's kind of cool, but... It's so accessible and it's gonna be a miasma of horrors for awhile. I think.
3:41 Again, caboosing perfectly fits here
not loud enough.
@@kaitek666 LOUDER!!!!
extreme panic
The state of AI doesn't scare me. The accelerating rate of accomplishments does.
It's gonna be the ultimate disinformation machine.
I suspect they have had this technology for a long long time and have been refining it and are now rolling it out as though its all new, the pace of advancement is far too quick to be natural progression, never seen anything like this in the technology field.
@@maccagrabme it can be used to improve itself so its all very exponential.
@@maccagrabme
We went from no planes, to jets in 30 years, and then to the moon in another 20.
PS1 to PS3 was barely 15 years, if that.
If anything it's proof that tech evolution time keeps getting smaller.
Given the generally low quality and bad resolution of security camera footage, it might be easier than ever to fake it and use it as false proof in fraudulent insurance claims and criminal cases
the wild part isnt that its possible. The wild thing about it is that we just began...
As others have said, what we're seeing now is the worst it will ever be. It will only improve from here on in.
@@sanseverything900 unless model collapse is a thing you know, nothing can go on exponential forever
3:42 This is the best drop of that song in the entire history of your channel and I loved it hahah
The times that the AI gets things wrong like the chair floating is much more interesting to me than when it gets things right. We can create some next level trippy videos with this technology
This is why AI will never replace real art. The only reasons we find it interesting it when it screws up.
Trust gamer philip to call a treadmill a conveyor.
Too much ar_baggage
3:18 is something cyriak would make
kitty city
god the child content on youtube is going to become horrendous
Spot the difference on the water reflection on the ground, not at the same frame rate, rendering is off. Especially the blue reflection near the yellow one. 1:05
I think one of the main ways to figure out if a video is AI generated or not is to look for inconsistencies once something goes out of frame.
If you check the "Tokyo walk" video in the original Sora article, you'll notice that once the lady passes in front of the blue sign, there's a tiny, subtle difference of the placement once it shows up again
Nobody seems to mention how the close-up of the Asian woman's face has her growing a chin and cheekbones appearing in a span of like 5 seconds.
At the clip around 1:20, I'm not seeing her cheekbones doing anything strange. The chin might appear to grow due to the camera position as she looks right and shows more of a profile. Yeah, it's an odd appearance for a woman never mind a woman of Asian descent, but it doesn't appear that her chin changed much if at all and if it did it changed back as she looks back at the camera.
Also her legs aren’t walking right. Also it’s obvious that this thing isn’t intelligent, it’s just trained off of datasets of existing work. People are acting like it authored everything from scratch , yet all it does it sample pixels and information and approximate it. It just got better at approximation techniques IMO.
how are people blind... her walk is so unnatural to the point where her left foot swaps to being her right foot.........
Governments. Ban this shit. Save humanity. Do your job.
This stuff makes me want to (redacted) Sam Altman and everyone who helped make it. Stuff like this isn’t just a negative for society, it’s literally an apocalyptic misinformation generator, some real MGS2 shit
Absolutely insane how quickly this is all coming together
The point he makes at the end is why I have been saying for years now that AI will be the downfall of humanity, no matter how many videos I see, and how "cool" it is, and the actual good uses of AI like nvidia is doing with games. I just can't get over the fact that this technology has infintie ways of ruining the world, and everything its doing we already had jobs for. The downsides outweight the upsides a million to one and developers dont seem to care
This was fascinating, especially on a ultratall display, it was so shocking that I farted, thankfully it aired out as I have a mesh chair, which I found funny, as an American.
I farted too. That was so loud cause my chair is metal so it served as amplifier. I almost went deaf for a moment but it smells of filet mignon with onions so it was worth it.
So weird that we're all just okay with kids watching crap quality videos. Surely kids should get to see the prettiest animations, most touching stories, things that teach them the most in a fun way. It's building their visual and mental library so why feed them the worst content?
The temporal coherency is just amazing.
I feel safe with this because Taylor Swift will quickly ban any AI generated content.
hahahahah
Oh, you were quick with this!
I knew you'd make a video, cause it shocked me when I saw it, but not this fast
That's because he was replaced by AI.
We just peeked into the Pandora's box. We as humans have a chance to close this cursed knowledge forever. Do not let our hubris cloud our judgement.
The alternative being the world people no longer believe in? Nah I’ll take my chances with the weird future
Wow! Sora was announced in the evening! You're super reactive :-)
To be honest, the simple idea that I'll no longer be able to say if what I'm watching is real or not, really happened or not, makes me kind of sad, even if the content is harmless. I feel that some of the magic behind the internet is about to break, but I'm not really sure what it is. It will definitely change the way I perceive and watch content, that's for sure.
Okay i am terrified of this. There NEEDS to be laws set in place to make sure this technology is used properly and with care.
I'm equally terrified, but laws won't help much.
Take the current state of ransom software for instance: It's illegal to extort others, but countries like Russia won't prosecute you, as long as you're harming the west - not to mention the intentional amount of disinformation state sponsored AI from Russia could have. We're about to enter a whole new era of the (dis-) information age
This stuff is open source, its not like some tech behind locked doors
And say EU bans it, what's stopping some scammers from India or China to abuse the tech
Wtf gayyyy
But how will the laws even control this? You dont need expensive special equipment. Just a decent PC and a software that has been written and to a certain extend distributed. Even with laws, the police cannot even be sure its AI if they know they dont know who did it and if they knew not always arrest/fine the person.
if at all
for now i have a very good and consistent way of differenciating the ai vids from the real ones:
my head.
my head actually starts to hurt when looking at sora generated videos
We'll strap you to a chair from now on as Chief AI Supervisor of Earth
there is a lack of a soul behind the faces in these videos which creeps me out
and the morphing of before has gotten very very very subtle
it does make me fearful for the future
I'm just thinking of all the jobs that are going to be replaced by this technology. What is everyone going to do? Pretty soon, we won't need 90% of the jobs in anything related to videography, graphic design, photography... Even the engineering jobs aren't safe from AI dominance; there is a lot happening in the background that people don't know about.
I wish AI was not possible, but it is, and it seems like it's going to mess up the general feeling of "purpose" in life. What the hell is everyone going to do?
Exactly. But you have to remember that this is different from previous automation. This time, an engineer didn't invent a new clever machine to do some process, they designed a machine to IMITATE things. And to imitate, they need to use an unimaginably huge amount of work people have made and released. They do not actually have a machine capable of drawing, writing or making videos if we make the laws so that anybody can't just hoover up all information we as a collective have released just to make profit and replace us.
Only things left will be manual labor and when thats gone nothing rly elites and robots wont have a need for most people anymore so will probably be left for dead
Baby wake up, new ways to generate misinformation and false content are coming to our lifes
I have no mouth and I must scream
its actually over, this is the best time to run away and live in woods
ok Karen, will do
you first.
@@KingLich451 bet.
How long before organizations begin to create ai videos for the purpose of falsely incriminating people?
I really do think these use games as training data. A lot of the materials, lighting, reflections and camera movements are so game-like there's no way they don't. The Tokyo scene is jittery like a video game, and its lighting seems to have the exact shortcomings of traditional rendering techniques.
too early to be cruising in space, too late to be financially stable in the economy, but just in time for the Ai generated slop surge
what a time to be alive
can't wait to see me doing something in court that i haven't done before
this horrorshow of AI development will soon be resolved, but unfortunately I will never forget the nightmare fuel that is will smith gobbling down endless forkfulls of spaghetti
If you want to cut costs these “tools” cut people and it will inevitably do so sooner than later. I can already see advertising agencies opting for one AI guy and another general clean up guy rather than a team of animators.
AI in the creative space will always take jobs even if it just generated an aspect of a production like 3D models rather than the whole thing. 3D modellers would therefore be in less demand.
AI art generation has been used in animation. Specifically backgrounds. In these cases, so far they’ve been used as a tool because it will generate an image that won’t conform with the characters, layout and that show’s style perfectly with current curation tools. But that will change.
It will get to a point where the only reason against AI is the thought that personality can shine through human creativity and can’t be faithfully replicated. But with future curation tools for these AI, I anticipate that idea will proven void.
There is no moral argument for justifying how these “tools” were created off the work of those they will harm. A layman doesn’t care. But as an artist and animator, I do.
My moral argument is that whatever is running this stuff will eventually be able to cure all diseases so it’s a necessary evil in a sense to get to that point
I thought that the footage of the cat and the woman in bed was real. But when it was shown again at the end of the video, I realised that wasn’t Philips cat, and I just found it scary that I thought it was real
AI videos are now more realistic than our dreams tbh
I am SO very glad that you're into AI generated things. I don't want anyone else to show, explain and poke at AI for me.
@3:07 the stairs on the lower left hand corner just ate those people!
maybe my efforts in trying to find errors with each video are just my thinly veiled attempts at trying to delegitimize
this scary new tool to comfort myself
R.I.P movie VFX artists
Corridor crew uses AI to replace animation
Ai: replaces corridor crew
@@matheussanthiago9685 in 10 months, top gun maverick level A.I videos will come, you don’t need real jets to shoot! which is sad, we are all gonna be replaced, becoming 1st in Harvard means nothing, any A.I can do your work, being the best hacker means nothing, A.I will do better…. only athletes and performers will survive, people still love human vs human chess.
From dalle to this? In a blink of an eye?! What awaits in next decade ?? This is terrifying 😅
What terrifies me is that it gets human faces really really right, which I remember used to be AI's achilles heel
You mean limbs and hands? It has always done faces well
@@Omega-mr1jg indeed, the website "this person does not exist" has been around for quite some time.
ai has been very good at faces for a LONG time, before the big ai image hype of the 2020s
Faces are basically the #1 thing that AI researchers have the most complete datasets to train on. Convincing looking face generators already existed before the early text-to-image tools caught on.
I assume you mean limbs, which was the big "oh it's ai" thing for a while. Then ai got really good and now we're not so sure what ai can't do
This is terrifying. People WILL probably go to prison because of these used as evidence.
If not because of openAI, then because anotehr company.
Reputations can be ruined because of one fake video. Too much media and internet illiteracy causes people to take things at face value (myself included at times).
Truly some nightmare fuel. It seems OpenAI is advancing tech and ignoring the consequences and human factor in all of this.
For me, the “errors” or “mistakes”, like the sand chair and the puppy producer, is where Ai introduces a new kind of digital creativity. I like seeing the dreamlike, uncanny, counter intuitive distortions of reality that AI can produce
What if this trailer is as fake as the division videogame graphics ?
It's joever 😢
Rip advertising videos, journalism copyright videos, music videos.
Soon, Rip painters, sculptors, music composers, singers, chefs, instrumentalists, coders.....traders.
After that Rip everyone
Only AI.
I cannot watch this video. I watched the first 10 seconds and I got an intense chill down my spine. This is extremely uncanny for me and I just cannot watch these AI videos without getting extreme chills. I don't know why but these videos terrify me like nothing I've seen before.
Grow up
@@UnimportantAcc quit being a dick
Forget accurate, high quality AI video. Cursed, deformed Will Smith eating endless amounts of spaghetti will always live in my head rent free.
2:59 this also happens with reflections (in the lady walking in Japan clip). My guess is, the training data included clips of videogames, where the reflections are often rendered with a lower framerate to reduce the performance impact; could that be it?
These videos are the closest I've seen to accurately visualize what's it like to be in a dream. Stuff not making sense, breaking laws of physics, only seeming to be real for a moment until you think about it, even something about the way the "camera" moves and is set up that's very dream-like.
Horror movies are going to be insane with some of this tech
I like how the company making this technology has a "safety policy." That's hilarious. It reminds me of people who actually believe robots could never hurt humans because Isaac Asimov wrote in his 1942 short story "Runaround" that "the first law [of Robotics is that] a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."
Like, that's great and all, but it was just a short story, not the laws of physics. Their lack of imagination astounds me. "Robots can't hurt us because I said so" has such similar vibes to "our AI won't be a problem because we wrote some safety guidelines." Sure, bud, good work lol.
3:16 Did you just call a treadmill a conveyor belt?
Clear sign the narration is AI generated