@@pitecusH H's only look modern, they're largely older teched motors than real Humvees, even if they claim electronic ignitions and fuel injection, Hummers are ADM shit wrapped up nicer, initially for swinging votes towards Schwarzenegger back in the day, and their almost twice the weight of a basic Humvee too.
reggearekka the number 1 needs 27l/ 100 km which is about as much as a Porsche Cayenne Turbo S when you drive it as quick as it's supposed to be (though the porsche can need up to 45). Makes you wonder where all the progress went.
Fun fact, the Viper V10 is the same as the Chrysler Magnum V10 used in the Dodge Ram, albeit heavily modified, which is based off the 5.9 V8 Magnum with two added cylinders as stated in the video. The Magnum engines came out in the '90s but were just an updated and improved version of the Chrysler LA engines that originally came out in the 1960's. This makes the Viper V10 one of the longest running engine families/designs in history. Lasting over half a century.
i mean, it would literally be illegal everywhere if they would sell a bugatti w/o catalytic converters and mufflers everywhere basically, i saw a guy who completely changed his exh and it sounded as loud as those 3000hp supras in a drag strip
It is quite epic to see that we have been producing smaller, stronger and more efficient engines over the years! Unfortunately now these days the great fuel engine has to make room for the electric engine in the car world 😢. Ironically it is comparable to the steam engines that had to go for the combustion technique... So thumbs up for VisioRacer, Classic Cars and Polska of course!
@@bruceparr1678 l'll bite, but I am making a large meal of a small comment.. I fear you're purposefully confused about the similarities and differences between motor, engine and transmission, either to troll, to attempt to be pedantic, or to seem knowlegable and you hopefully thought to intend to say.. "..a really inefficient form of energy transfer." ..otherwise what's written bellow is desciptively overdoing it for the sake of clarification, more for others as it is for youself. *Engine* usually describes a more mechanical mechanism that transmits the power/force/energy it generates (or has stored within it) from one direction/vector to a differecnt one, i.e; changing the linear Reciprocating pistons force into a Rotating force. Or like a Manganol Siege Engine, a Jet Engine or a Steam Engine. Also the origin of word *Motor* is Moteur, which means engine in French. Both motors and engines can use chemical, thermal or electrical means to create the output force they produce. Typically an electric motor in the modern understanding, does not involve such a mechanical style like that of an engine, but that does not mean electrical engines do not exist, as they do, and have done for a long time, since at least the 1930s, ..if not from before the coil wound armenture electric motor was invented during the mid-to-late 1800s (I'm guesstimating) - I wouldn't be suprised if the 1st/earliest electric motor/engine attempts was/were based on electrifing aspects of a steam engines pistoning system sometime during the end of trhe 1700s or early 1800s. Yes, indeed the *Electric Engine* or *Solonoid Engine* is somewhat less efficient than the usual 'normal' electric armenture motor. But it does have the prospective greater rotational torque force closer to that of an internal combustion engine with the additional dynamic, gyroscopic & centrafugal weight of the conrods, crankshaft etc, but certainly without the near instantly accelerative torque force of the ammenture motor. *Transmission* when in reference to motors or engines typically are a form of gearbox and power/drive train system, transmitting power to a flywheel or the wheels/tyres upon roads/grounds surface. Electrically speaking, transmission generally means conveying power between places, usually by power lines from the power-station(s) to the transformer sub-stations through to homes and businesses, and NOT in how the power is generated or used. Apologies for me reading like a pedanticly assumptive ass who's worked in & studied engineering, typically I am also of an acerbic character; I've far too many years of watching Ben Elton, Monty Python, Blackadder, Red Dwarf, Archer, David Fletcher MBE, Mjr. Nicolas Moran, Karl Kasarda, Ian McCollum & Lindybeige etc...
Yeah, the builder took the engine of a Spitfire WW2 fighter (or what was the plane that used that V12) and put it on some old fire truck structure. Awful driving and actually terribly slow (since heavy as heck and small tires + bad old suspension) but was super cool hearing it run - sounds exactly as a WW2 fighter
Think it was a BMW engine, so probably a FW or Me, I'm guessing...but could also be found in Do, Ju and He aircraft. Definitely German, and yep, from an airplane. Same thing has also been done with an old Rolls Royce and a Spitfire engine. Far from production cars...but a blast to see nevertheless. :-)
The Meteor that appeared during the same episode has the chassis from a 1930s Rolls-Royce Phantom and a World War II-vintage, 27-liter (1,648 cu in) Rolls-Royce Meteor engine. However there have been other Bentley-derived cars with aero engines, such as the 1929 Napier-Bentley. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero-engined_car
In the 80's Toyota was caught using an Iron Duke in their Baja 500 race trucks. I remember a lot of 300+ hp Fiero's eating Vette's and Porsche's for lunch.
Maybe his sources only quoted hp and it was too much work to dig up the torque figures. In those days HP was the big selling point and determined top speed which is what drove a lot of buyers to purchase. In his other videos he quotes detailed specs if they are available. I'm confident he doesn't have any of these cars to take to his local dyno operator to produce your torque figures. Any motoring enthusiast would guess these big engines would produce substantial torque at low rpm. Perhaps you could look up the torque figures and report back to us all.
The Royal and the Pierce-Arrow were what "gentleman motoring" was all about. You knew you'd "arrived" when your radiator was in one zip code and the passenger cabin in another. A time when "quality" still meant something.
Life could be a dream (sh-boom) If I could take you up in paradise up above (sh-boom) If you would tell me I'm the only one that you love Life could be a dream, sweetheart Hello, hello again, sh-boom and hopin' we'll meet again
AHH YES! My father had a '75 sky blue Cadillac Sedan DeVille with the 500 c.i. engine, and we used to call it 'The Queen Elizabeth 2"! We sailed it across the U.S. from New Jersey to California and back! With 6 people in it no less! Those were the days!
It's incredible to see how drastically engine technology has improved over time. 100 years ago, there were engines that needed 9.2L to make a measly 110HP. Today, you can make the same power (n.a.) with 6x less displacement.
The Viper engine was not based on the truck engine. They share a displacement, nothing more. Furthermore, even if it were, the truck V10 was from the Magnum engine series, not LA. In the strictest sense, the Magnums were simply modified and more advanced LA engines, but that's different enough for most enthusiasts to consider them separate families (as does most of the aftermarket because the top-ends are complete departures from each other).
My grandmother's '71 Cadillac Eldorado coupe had one of the 500 cid V8's, and because it was built after 1966 it was also front wheel drive! I remember riding in it as a kid and while the front wheels didn't slip often with that heavy lump trying to press them down to China, when they did she'd fight the wheel until the car did her bidding. It sounded glorious when she got on it, as she did from time to time to mess with Mustang and Camaro drivers (that heavy beast was surprisingly quick), but in a refined sort of way. The car was large inside and out, with a hood that could just about land a Cessna and a red interior with so much leather and velour that it could put a Parisian brothel to shame. I miss them both.
He missed the biggest production engine ever built. Yes it is European, but not mentioned here, yet this engine had only 4 cylinders with a cubic capacity of 21.5 litres.
Bros. Duesenberg purchased most of their engines from Miller, with their "flagship" being the 1934 SJ Boat-Tail Roadster which Clark Gable and his wife Carol Lombard each had a copy of. 400 HP/480 ft/lbs of torque from a Bendix supercharger equipped 340 cu. in. in-line 8 cylinder engine. This was the most powerful Duesenberg ever. In the late '20's, I believe they offered a V-12 of about 6.7L (400 CID). As a low compression ration engine (needed for the fuels of that era), I doubt it reached 200 BHP.
No footage of the Pierce-Arrow driving and a week later Leno puts a video out on one. I don't know if that was bad timing for Visio or great timing for us in general
@@stancars9359 Mostly due to Californication refusing to license any vehicle for street use that will exceed 160 MPH."V" rated DOT legal tires, don't ya' know?
He's NOT talking about HD and special duty engines here. There are 8 wheel drive farm tractors built with Otto cycle (spark ignition, "gasoline") engines with displacements beyond 12L today and even 4 stages of super/turbocharging. They are "only" 400 HP, but can exceed 4800 ft/lbs of torque.
Heya visio, i am a slav from lithuania, thanks to you and boostlust i have been inspired to make car videos, if u have some time, can you check out one of my vids and pleeeeeeeease leave feedback, as that is what i need the most! thanks in regards!
@chris younts A 70cc Suzuki or Yamaha Formula 4 GP bike is a two-stroke single turning upwards of 30,000 RPM, producing about 40HP but no torque to speak of. If you read Sir Harry Ricardo's book "High Speed Internal Combustion Engines" he gives the "power triangle". HP vs: Torque vs: weight. Pick two. HP+torque=heavy engine. HP+weight=torquey engine(all things being equal, which they really aren't), but the principle is valid.
I remember the "Cadzilla" 500. We had a 72 which was rated well north of 500hp. I remember my mom doing the Tucson to Phoenix run with the needle bouncing off the speedometer at 125mph in a little less than an hour. Pretty good accomplishment for such a heavy car. Good times.
Pekne . Zaujímavé video. Myslel som si, že naša škoda favorit, ktorý vie zožrať aj okolo 10 litrov je ozaj veľa. A to je len 1.3 tuším. Ale zásobovať tieto motory benzínom... Koľko tam bolo písané ? 20-30 litrov ? Nielen cena auta samotného, ale aj jeho kŕmenie je dosť finančne náročné. Takéto autá, aké boli v tomto videu nie sú pre každého.
What mad is how power has shot up. Look at the V-16 at 2:29 , it made 200 horsepower, meanwhile now the inline 3 of the koeningsegg gamer a produces 600 horsepower. That means the amount of pistons needed to produce 200 horsepower has decreased from 16 to just 1. That's absolutely mental.
8:04 hispano is owned by Tata motors the same company owns Jaguar and land rover! , Tata motors is an Indian company from 18th century and most of the modern day job rules are made by them! 8hr of work time and life insurance was only given by Tata in 19th century! and they are still very good! , the company dontes 50% of there total income in charity and that is why Ratan Tata is not the richest man in India! , they made the Tata Nano , the baseline model cost 2000$ for a car that is ok for Daly city use and has better ac than your 20k $ Honda it is a very good car! , top of the line has automatic transmission , 23km/lt , abs , air conditioning system , and reliable!
are you sure its still 2000 dollars for a tata nano now? i heard they couldnt keep it that cheap anymore.... Hispano was bought over by Tata only in 2005...
fidel catsro that is what the base model cost 2000$ little tax and a bit of insurance from the dealer will put you 500$ more! , there was a guy who said to Ratan Tata that this car will put the company on loss and it will be a big problem form the company to make the production smothe that guy got fired from Tata Nano and when this car was launched Ratan Tata was very happy that he was able to make a car that was safer than a bike with 4or 5people (this is India , in southern part of India 4 to 5 people sit on bikes! ) yes it is not as safe as 10k $ car or normal 20k$ car but it's is cheap and it never run fast enough to make a big crash , top speed is 60miles /hr or 100km / hr ,....,... yes it has no air bag, steering wheel will come and go through you if it crash
I guess making two doesn't constitute 'production' but my favourite is the 1911 Fiat S76 that I saw go up the hill at Goodwood this year. 28 litres in only 4 cylinders and the exhaust simply exits from short rectangular stubs that finish flush with the bonnet. Nice noise!
Imagine the fuel consumption on the Magnum, i reckon at least 25l per 100km and that's a conservative estimate. Not a fan of American cars but the Viper motor is beautiful.
No, more like 16L per Km. I've driven one and watched the built-in fuel mileage computer. It got nearly the same as my 5.2L Magnum engine in a 2700 lb. Dodge Dakota pick-up, just totally in-town driving hurt it more, but it was in a 6000 truck too.
27.7L / 100km isnt THAT bad considering it is an 13,5L engine in the 20s!
Yeah, a Hummer H2 will do that or worse, and it's a relatively modern car.
you can see many 300ci 4 cyls at the time pulling the same cunsomption ...so yeah it was actually excellent
Probably that on a mixed cycle..... If is purely city route i won be surprise if it got 5mpg
@@pitecusH H's only look modern, they're largely older teched motors than real Humvees, even if they claim electronic ignitions and fuel injection, Hummers are ADM shit wrapped up nicer, initially for swinging votes towards Schwarzenegger back in the day, and their almost twice the weight of a basic Humvee too.
Viper will be missed. That was a true MURICA super car
Bboy 1hunnid it's coming back don't worry
Simon Dobrev hopefully. They need to redesign it so it meets safety regulations
Agree,the Corvette isn't the best American sportscar.
Sports car*
Lazar Kaganovič nah super car. Respect it lil boy
Imagine these cars with 11:1 compression
rockets on suicide mission potential..
The cylinder heads would blow through the hood!
at that compression you dont even have to turn ignition on to blow it up...just dry compression would wreck the rods
Look up modern BBC, BBF, and BBM engines. Can hit 1000 hp without forced induction
My friend has a 502ci v8 in his 72 c10. It's got 12:1 compression and makes 435 horsepower and 500 ft lb of torque.
these cars must have good mpg
reggearekka the number 1 needs 27l/ 100 km which is about as much as a Porsche Cayenne Turbo S when you drive it as quick as it's supposed to be (though the porsche can need up to 45).
Makes you wonder where all the progress went.
reggearekka If your expectations are low enough, yes they do have good mpg
Progress went into the Cayenne Turbo S being uncomparably faster than the Pierce Arrow, much quiter and more economical if the driver isn't a moron.
+ that MPG is probably general (average) because you were probably lucky to saw a car in 1910 and they dont care too much about traffic jams :D
reggearekka for their size... actually yeah. The more modern engines anyways!
sadly, gone are the days of 2L+ per cylinder. Imagine an 8L+ four banger today lol.
With modern rev levels... Car shaken to pieces in no time. A 12 litre inline 6 though, now that's and interesting idea ;)
we will have no oil anymore? please dont tell me you buy that "fossil" fuel crap? oil is not made from dinosaurs lmao.
6The6Devil6 oil is oil and has many different sources
when has there ever been an 8 l four banger?
@@8HshanHow about one further, a 12 cylinder inline motor.
They were huge back in the day because compression ratio used to be pretty shit
Fuel was completely different as well.
Petrol was pretty shit back then!
@@carpediemarts705 thats why the compression was so low
Fun fact, the Viper V10 is the same as the Chrysler Magnum V10 used in the Dodge Ram, albeit heavily modified, which is based off the 5.9 V8 Magnum with two added cylinders as stated in the video. The Magnum engines came out in the '90s but were just an updated and improved version of the Chrysler LA engines that originally came out in the 1960's. This makes the Viper V10 one of the longest running engine families/designs in history. Lasting over half a century.
The Bugatti engine is surprisingly quiet
Ian Wilson
Turbos tend to do that to engines.
blyndrotor plus france's strict emissions also helped with that
A N/A V12 sounds like a freaking demon out of hell but when after twin turbo'd it up the sound suddenly changes into very quiet and calm
i mean, it would literally be illegal everywhere if they would sell a bugatti w/o catalytic converters and mufflers everywhere basically, i saw a guy who completely changed his exh and it sounded as loud as those 3000hp supras in a drag strip
Straight pipe a veyron and you will have the exhaust of a dragster
It is quite epic to see that we have been producing smaller, stronger and more efficient engines over the years! Unfortunately now these days the great fuel engine has to make room for the electric engine in the car world 😢. Ironically it is comparable to the steam engines that had to go for the combustion technique...
So thumbs up for VisioRacer, Classic Cars and Polska of course!
No such thing as an electric engine. The electric motor is a transmission not an engine. The power has to be imported from an engine or solar cell.
@@bruceparr1678 ...O'really
th-cam.com/video/x4im3M9IFcI/w-d-xo.html
@@razor1uk610 That looks like a really inefficient transmission.
@@bruceparr1678 l'll bite, but I am making a large meal of a small comment..
I fear you're purposefully confused about the similarities and differences between motor, engine and transmission, either to troll, to attempt to be pedantic, or to seem knowlegable and you hopefully thought to intend to say..
"..a really inefficient form of energy transfer."
..otherwise what's written bellow is desciptively overdoing it for the sake of clarification, more for others as it is for youself.
*Engine* usually describes a more mechanical mechanism that transmits the power/force/energy it generates (or has stored within it) from one direction/vector to a differecnt one, i.e; changing the linear Reciprocating pistons force into a Rotating force. Or like a Manganol Siege Engine, a Jet Engine or a Steam Engine.
Also the origin of word *Motor* is Moteur, which means engine in French. Both motors and engines can use chemical, thermal or electrical means to create the output force they produce.
Typically an electric motor in the modern understanding, does not involve such a mechanical style like that of an engine, but that does not mean electrical engines do not exist, as they do, and have done for a long time, since at least the 1930s,
..if not from before the coil wound armenture electric motor was invented during the mid-to-late 1800s (I'm guesstimating) - I wouldn't be suprised if the 1st/earliest electric motor/engine attempts was/were based on electrifing aspects of a steam engines pistoning system sometime during the end of trhe 1700s or early 1800s.
Yes, indeed the *Electric Engine* or *Solonoid Engine* is somewhat less efficient than the usual 'normal' electric armenture motor. But it does have the prospective greater rotational torque force closer to that of an internal combustion engine with the additional dynamic, gyroscopic & centrafugal weight of the conrods, crankshaft etc, but certainly without the near instantly accelerative torque force of the ammenture motor.
*Transmission* when in reference to motors or engines typically are a form of gearbox and power/drive train system, transmitting power to a flywheel or the wheels/tyres upon roads/grounds surface.
Electrically speaking, transmission generally means conveying power between places, usually by power lines from the power-station(s) to the transformer sub-stations through to homes and businesses,
and NOT in how the power is generated or used.
Apologies for me reading like a pedanticly assumptive ass who's worked in & studied engineering, typically I am also of an acerbic character; I've far too many years of watching Ben Elton, Monty Python, Blackadder, Red Dwarf, Archer, David Fletcher MBE, Mjr. Nicolas Moran, Karl Kasarda, Ian McCollum & Lindybeige etc...
@@razor1uk610 Very nice insult, but an insult is not an argument.
"No replacement for displacement"
Rodrigo Gomes turbos
Raptor 450 or stupid high compression
put a turbo on the big displacement. argument invalid.
Frigglebiscuit put a turbo on a rotary. Argument invalid
Put two turbos and two roots supercharger in a Big Engine.
Voi La
Crap, my 1.0 liter just pooped everywhere by seeing that
Benjamin K i have a 0.7 lmao
I have a 4.2L I6 lol
Its okay i only have 66cc's
lol i have 50cc in my moped and 1800cc in my bmw :D
Benjamin K your 1.0 l is probably faster than any car from this list
Check out the "BMW Brutus" it has a 47 liter 12 zyl engine, but it was not a production car
Yeah, the builder took the engine of a Spitfire WW2 fighter (or what was the plane that used that V12) and put it on some old fire truck structure.
Awful driving and actually terribly slow (since heavy as heck and small tires + bad old suspension) but was super cool hearing it run - sounds exactly as a WW2 fighter
Think it was a BMW engine, so probably a FW or Me, I'm guessing...but could also be found in Do, Ju and He aircraft. Definitely German, and yep, from an airplane. Same thing has also been done with an old Rolls Royce and a Spitfire engine. Far from production cars...but a blast to see nevertheless. :-)
Correction, old Bentley. And both were compared in Top Gear :)
The Meteor that appeared during the same episode has the chassis from a 1930s Rolls-Royce Phantom and a World War II-vintage, 27-liter (1,648 cu in) Rolls-Royce Meteor engine. However there have been other Bentley-derived cars with aero engines, such as the 1929 Napier-Bentley.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero-engined_car
Kalvinjj it was from a Heinkel HE-111
No German company would make a engine for the enemy ;)
Viper u will 4ever be missed, pls come back... 😪😪😪... But great video man!
KRISTIJAN 5112003, they made a new Dodge Viper.
The Bugatti Veyron Sounds like a Jet engine making that pass Just Beautiful Would definitely love to get a ride on One of those at high speed
3:12 Minor correction on the year, it was used up to 2014 in GM's Medium Duty lineup including the Kodiak and the Topkick
Justin Noker start year of 1908
You can still order 3/4 tons and up with the 8 series big block to this day
what’s the most constipated engine to ever exist?... The iron duke! :D
??
2.5L 4 cylinder, made 80 horsepower, and was also extremely heavy. has since proven to be more useful as a boat anchor.
Justin Noker Ya that’s the joke. it’s extremely slow and heavy
I made 300hp out of my 1985 Pontiac Fiero's iron Duke before someone hit and totaled my baby.
In the 80's Toyota was caught using an Iron Duke in their Baja 500 race trucks. I remember a lot of 300+ hp Fiero's eating Vette's and Porsche's for lunch.
That Cadillac 😍
Can you make for the next video of the best engines in fuel consumption with an acceptable performance?
NICOLAS Glez. Ecoboost and the GM x16ler series imho
13.6 Straight 6,any engine swap idea?
The usual ,maybe an rx7
Yes, stay out of the Swamp not a great place to swap a motor.
don't go the the engine swamp. too many ogres there
Honda?
Shrek's swamp
I love Visioracer but he seems to ignore torque. He's focusing too much on hp when torque is a better measure of usable power.
time to buy him a torque wrench.. hahah
Maybe his sources only quoted hp and it was too much work to dig up the torque figures. In those days HP was the big selling point and determined top speed which is what drove a lot of buyers to purchase. In his other videos he quotes detailed specs if they are available. I'm confident he doesn't have any of these cars to take to his local dyno operator to produce your torque figures. Any motoring enthusiast would guess these big engines would produce substantial torque at low rpm. Perhaps you could look up the torque figures and report back to us all.
torque is not a good figure of usable power. torque is a figure of torque.
hp is torque aseki. please read up on it before you try to sound smart.
I like the videos, but his monotone voice and computer syntax make me want to turn off audio and just read.
Got here before TH-cam notified me
The Royal and the Pierce-Arrow were what "gentleman motoring" was all about. You knew you'd "arrived" when your radiator was in one zip code and the passenger cabin in another. A time when "quality" still meant something.
Life could be a dream (sh-boom)
If I could take you up in paradise up above (sh-boom)
If you would tell me I'm the only one that you love
Life could be a dream, sweetheart
Hello, hello again, sh-boom and hopin' we'll meet again
Oldtimer
Mafia 2 acutally :D
A lovely song
Cars. Beautiful.
American engine=8L, 190hp..
European engine=1.4L=220hp
A Frog that was in the past and most European uses mostly supercharged or turbocharged engines. In the USA it’s mostly NA engines its normal
Le Chat Botté boy, motorcycles dont have any turbos n shit
Lmao Mustang GT500 2020 one tho
6.2L Supercharged V8 and 760HP...
A 5.0L Twin Turbocharged V8 Koenigsegg produces like 1600HP...
I've been following you for 2 years. Your English has gotten ALOT better. Thanks for the awesome content!
AHH YES! My father had a '75 sky blue Cadillac Sedan DeVille with the 500 c.i. engine, and we used to call it 'The Queen Elizabeth 2"! We sailed it across the U.S. from New Jersey to California and back! With 6 people in it no less! Those were the days!
You don't measure these in MPG you measure them in GPM
The Cadillac 500 doesn't do to hateful inused to get 18 out of mine on the highway but touch the gas to pass and you could watch the gauge drop...
they are some big ass engines great to see most of them still going
#VisioSquad
It's incredible to see how drastically engine technology has improved over time. 100 years ago, there were engines that needed 9.2L to make a measly 110HP. Today, you can make the same power (n.a.) with 6x less displacement.
So the viper v10 had some italian help to exist, i found it pretty rare that an usa car brand have added 2 cylinders to a v8.
all the engines from the early car days are insane
Fiat S76 had a 28.4L 4 cylinder engine, I am surprised you missed that one
It's an airplane engine stuffed into a car.
Why old cars are right-hand drive ??
Back then you had to be on the left side of the road as horses were still extremely common as knights back then had swords
Inefficient cars, but fan cars ;)
Didn't the Ettore Bugatti chop an aircraft engine in half and stick it in a car?
Yes he did in the late 30's. But it wasn't a production car, even for a Bugatti.
That Pierce Arrow looks absolutely stunning. And huge.
And here I was getting impressed by seeing busses rolling on 12L engines.
france is crazy
Viper ❤️❤️❤️😁
It's pretty funny that the Veyron's 8.0 W16 weighs about 150 kg more than the Viper's 8.4L V10.
Turbos are heavy. DOHC is heavy compared to pushrod engines.
Strictly speaking, ten liters is more of a minimum than a maximum.
Rolls royce the beast ? V12 merlin
@chris younts 1734 CID. The Much larger Griffon aero engine is 23L. Damiler made similar sized engines for the Bf-109's.
That Bugatti Royale with the white/blue two-tone paint is so pretty.
Ouch 8.5 to the gallon the '20s'.
I would have thought that might present logistical problems.
The Viper engine was not based on the truck engine. They share a displacement, nothing more. Furthermore, even if it were, the truck V10 was from the Magnum engine series, not LA. In the strictest sense, the Magnums were simply modified and more advanced LA engines, but that's different enough for most enthusiasts to consider them separate families (as does most of the aftermarket because the top-ends are complete departures from each other).
My fav one is the 8.1
Amaricul Fuck yeah
later on bugatti royale engine was used in locomotives!
Cadillac Eldorado from the 1970's had a 8.2 litre engine (500 cubic inch)!
8.1 Chevy is a beast.
Maibach zepellin V12 ?
My grandmother's '71 Cadillac Eldorado coupe had one of the 500 cid V8's, and because it was built after 1966 it was also front wheel drive! I remember riding in it as a kid and while the front wheels didn't slip often with that heavy lump trying to press them down to China, when they did she'd fight the wheel until the car did her bidding. It sounded glorious when she got on it, as she did from time to time to mess with Mustang and Camaro drivers (that heavy beast was surprisingly quick), but in a refined sort of way. The car was large inside and out, with a hood that could just about land a Cessna and a red interior with so much leather and velour that it could put a Parisian brothel to shame. I miss them both.
The chevrolet 8100 is a 496 cubic inch big block V8.
Is this the French guy that raced Rickey Bobby
“...... those build in the beginning of the Last century“ shows a Viper to make fun of Americans being stuck in the 1960 in engine Tec.
The dodge v10 magnum sounds nothing like a cummins at idle
You've always had good topics, but the narration in these later videos takes away from what we want to hear, which is the sound of the engines.
Why do you feel you need to subtitle? I can understand you.
Some still do not. Or perhaps they just don't want to understand
I thought the 6.2l engine in one of my cars was huge.
He missed the biggest production engine ever built. Yes it is European, but not mentioned here, yet this engine had only 4 cylinders with a cubic capacity of 21.5 litres.
It was made for air planes, not cars.
Average is 5.5 🙄
Where Duesenberg???
Bros. Duesenberg purchased most of their engines from Miller, with their "flagship" being the 1934 SJ Boat-Tail Roadster which Clark Gable and his wife Carol Lombard each had a copy of. 400 HP/480 ft/lbs of torque from a Bendix supercharger equipped 340 cu. in. in-line 8 cylinder engine. This was the most powerful Duesenberg ever. In the late '20's, I believe they offered a V-12 of about 6.7L (400 CID). As a low compression ration engine (needed for the fuels of that era), I doubt it reached 200 BHP.
The Bug Royale never really became a full production car though. There was not enough interest for it.
No footage of the Pierce-Arrow driving and a week later Leno puts a video out on one. I don't know if that was bad timing for Visio or great timing for us in general
Why has Dodge stopped producing the Viper?
Due to regulations
@@stancars9359 Mostly due to Californication refusing to license any vehicle for street use that will exceed 160 MPH."V" rated DOT legal tires, don't ya' know?
Great video, very informative but if i had to make a change, didn’t GMC have a 702 truck engine?
Evan Salyer yes but for medium and heavy duty applications and some military I think missle carriers
He's NOT talking about HD and special duty engines here. There are 8 wheel drive farm tractors built with Otto cycle (spark ignition, "gasoline") engines with displacements beyond 12L today and even 4 stages of super/turbocharging. They are "only" 400 HP, but can exceed 4800 ft/lbs of torque.
The vortec 8100 should've never been discontinued.
You're joking, right?
What about the 27-liter Bentley?
Huh. So the winner of this roundup gets 8.5mpg... pretty bad, but not the end of the world like I expected lol.
Heya visio, i am a slav from lithuania, thanks to you and boostlust i have been inspired to make car videos, if u have some time, can you check out one of my vids and pleeeeeeeease leave feedback, as that is what i need the most! thanks in regards!
Hey im a newbie here. By logic and mind, how low cc can beat huge cc. its like comparing 125cc bike vs 250cc and we already know whos the winner
@chris younts A 70cc Suzuki or Yamaha Formula 4 GP bike is a two-stroke single turning upwards of 30,000 RPM, producing about 40HP but no torque to speak of. If you read Sir Harry Ricardo's book "High Speed Internal Combustion Engines" he gives the "power triangle". HP vs: Torque vs: weight. Pick two. HP+torque=heavy engine. HP+weight=torquey engine(all things being equal, which they really aren't), but the principle is valid.
Sounds make me goosebumps
Finally some good Engines i can choose from for my Honda Civic project
13.5 is big, but a 13.5 INLINE SIX?! Thar must've been some terrible fuel economy
You should do a video on the fuel odometer to see how much fuel it takes.
i like my MTU MB 873 engines more!
W-16 engines are overrated.
Where is the Devel Sixteen ?
That car is a scam
Hey.. how about Fiat S76.. The Beast Of Turin.. ? With 28.5litres straight 4 engine.. U must have missed that
Air plane engine, not a car engine.
Viper v10 first v10 by dodge... so let's just forget about the dodge magnum v10
Now turbo 4 bangers can do 1000hp
Sexy, not sexi
Good video dood, original topic, good information, 10/10
Pedro Rocha dude. Not dood
Cracked Emerald dude not dood
@Playlister Got Them Not Got 'Em Lol
@@SolaricSage116 Got them, not got 'em lol
I remember the "Cadzilla" 500. We had a 72 which was rated well north of 500hp. I remember my mom doing the Tucson to Phoenix run with the needle bouncing off the speedometer at 125mph in a little less than an hour. Pretty good accomplishment for such a heavy car. Good times.
sexy is spelled with a Y visio
Oh, yes, it is. It is not in my language, though, that's why I guess lol.
it I spelled sexi in yours? lol funny how language? it is funny how different cultures use similar words
@@joshuakozee5719 In Slovak (Czech too, maybe other slavic lanugages also) is I and Y pronounced in the same way. Its only different in written word.
9:40 The little Veyron looks so cute.
You are right! That magnum V10 sounds just like a Cummins diesel at idle! Crazy.
Pekne . Zaujímavé video. Myslel som si, že naša škoda favorit, ktorý vie zožrať aj okolo 10 litrov je ozaj veľa. A to je len 1.3 tuším. Ale zásobovať tieto motory benzínom... Koľko tam bolo písané ? 20-30 litrov ? Nielen cena auta samotného, ale aj jeho kŕmenie je dosť finančne náročné. Takéto autá, aké boli v tomto videu nie sú pre každého.
What mad is how power has shot up. Look at the V-16 at 2:29 , it made 200 horsepower, meanwhile now the inline 3 of the koeningsegg gamer a produces 600 horsepower. That means the amount of pistons needed to produce 200 horsepower has decreased from 16 to just 1. That's absolutely mental.
This video made me think of a future topic: Worst fuel economy engines in the world!
Seriously I'd love to see a video on that subject
This is the best video of your channel,tks visio racer !
8:04 hispano is owned by Tata motors the same company owns Jaguar and land rover! , Tata motors is an Indian company from 18th century and most of the modern day job rules are made by them! 8hr of work time and life insurance was only given by Tata in 19th century! and they are still very good! , the company dontes 50% of there total income in charity and that is why Ratan Tata is not the richest man in India! , they made the Tata Nano , the baseline model cost 2000$ for a car that is ok for Daly city use and has better ac than your 20k $ Honda it is a very good car! , top of the line has automatic transmission , 23km/lt , abs , air conditioning system , and reliable!
Kuntal, didn't expect you here buddy :D
Alex Kirchgessner hey! , you are German Alex right? from retro machine?
are you sure its still 2000 dollars for a tata nano now? i heard they couldnt keep it that cheap anymore.... Hispano was bought over by Tata only in 2005...
fidel catsro that is what the base model cost 2000$ little tax and a bit of insurance from the dealer will put you 500$ more! , there was a guy who said to Ratan Tata that this car will put the company on loss and it will be a big problem form the company to make the production smothe that guy got fired from Tata Nano and when this car was launched Ratan Tata was very happy that he was able to make a car that was safer than a bike with 4or 5people (this is India , in southern part of India 4 to 5 people sit on bikes! ) yes it is not as safe as 10k $ car or normal 20k$ car but it's is cheap and it never run fast enough to make a big crash , top speed is 60miles /hr or 100km / hr ,....,... yes it has no air bag, steering wheel will come and go through you if it crash
I guess making two doesn't constitute 'production' but my favourite is the 1911 Fiat S76 that I saw go up the hill at Goodwood this year. 28 litres in only 4 cylinders and the exhaust simply exits from short rectangular stubs that finish flush with the bonnet. Nice noise!
I just love your channel
Imagine the fuel consumption on the Magnum, i reckon at least 25l per 100km and that's a conservative estimate. Not a fan of American cars but the Viper motor is beautiful.
No, more like 16L per Km. I've driven one and watched the built-in fuel mileage computer. It got nearly the same as my 5.2L Magnum engine in a 2700 lb. Dodge Dakota pick-up, just totally in-town driving hurt it more, but it was in a 6000 truck too.
The engine of the Baxter Model 5 is basically an watercooled descendant of that WW1 aircooled aero engine used in Fokker/Albatros D. series aircraft.
Engine at min 2:29 is it a V10 or a V16 ??? Can clearly see 5 exhaust tubes to a collector on each side .So where are the other cylinders ???
My my, I love those big Cadillacs.
Impressive engines and displacements, but i still prefer the sound of a V8 engine
That Locomobile engine sounded nice.
Its cool to see my 8.1L suburban pop up on this list.