Due to Copyrights, A part of chicken run 1 had to be removed. Mrs Tweedy basically does some animal cruelty for trying to end gingers life. ☕I now have a Buy Me A Coffee page on which you can support me :D www.buymeacoffee.com/animatedcourtroom
You forgot about Shaun the sheep the movie there they have an animal control guy even though he's doing his job but he does do things that are considered criminal the sheep do some small minor criminal activity and the pigs at the very beginning do some minor criminal activity as well and Arthur Christmas there's no villains in the film but they do some small minor criminal Acts they're good people and yes these are both aardman movies
The irony is that Mrs. Tweedy runs a pretty ethical chicken farm. Her chickens are well-fed, not injected with hormones, have plenty of room to run around, and even have recreational activities.
Technically, the only thing you could get Mrs Tweedy on would be Domestic Abuse and Food Standards Agency violations (Those pies and nuggets would have been contaminated beyond belief).
Spencer has a point. A Macerator [the machine in the first film] are used to dispose of unwanted male chick's & unfit for consumption females; they aren't used re' chicken for consumption 😂 . (though the company that sold the Tweedy's the machine are also liable for fraud, as the company clearly altered & marketed Macerators for a purpose likely to endanger Public Health.
The nuggets, especially. Not only is it false advertising (being made from battery hens that are brainwashed, & being the whole chicken blended, containing feathers, eyeballs, brain, blood, etc.), those nuggets would contain fragments of glass, wires & plastic from those collars, which is a serious health violation. Food containing bits of inedible content will immediately get recalled, & if they find it in every single product, investigations & a potential company shutdown could happen. The factory is also an OSHA violation, as someone could easily fall off into the meat grinder, as seen with Melissa Tweedy. That is a guaranteed factory shutdown.
i would agree with you but a lot of factory made pies, tend to follow a set recipe passed down that was originally homemade, like say KFC chicken was at one point homemade but got commercialized and mass-production. Plus in a technical sense this was in her home i.e in the barn and not a factory complex. So in a way it still counts as homemade.
@@GeckoTech_Engineer a lot of companies lie anyway some of them say for example say there vegetables are non-GMO. But most of them are obviously full of crap. Hence way its often better to buy the real organic grown stuff at local smaller family owned stores or farmers market where you can get the real organic ones.
Minor thing: Victor's charges would need to be altered, as locking up Grommit without the permission of Wallace, his legal owner, that's petnapping and animal cruelty. Unless that is the case, then any actions taken by *his* dog can't be attributed to him. Either the dog is it's own person, letting him get in trouble for False Imprisonment, but removing the charges based on the dog's actions, or it's not, removing the false imprisonment, but letting him be charged for different crimes and for the actions of his own dog.
Not to mention potentially Vandalism & Malicious Destruction of Property 🤔 . (the Tree belongs to either a nearby estate or to the government/monarch; time was that [for instance] poaching on royal lands in England carried the death penalty)
Perhaps base it on UK law, not US law. Aardman is a British company, after all, and most of the movies are based in the UK for a large part of it. The reason I say this is because you included the death sentence in one, but there is no death penalty in the UK. It was abolished decades ago.
We have to consider the time period; Chicken Run for example was set in 1962. We can determine this from the fact Dion DiMucci's track "The Wanderer" is still receiving radio airplay on the Light Programme - the track was released in November 1961, suggesting the film is set in the spring and summer of 1962.
Mrs. Tweedy is aware that chickens are sentient near the end of the first movie, so any crime committed against them in the second film would have to be counted as a similar crime against humanity. Attempted murder, kidnapping, false imprisonment, etc. Those flashbacks of her fight against the protagonist of the first film are proof.
EDIT: I think you did say in which countries these sentences are applied later in the video but the sentencing is all over the place as we don't have 2nd degree in the UK, its called Manslaughter. Just want a bit of clarity :) Which countries laws are you basing it? You sound like you have a British accent and if I was being technical here most of these "crimes" have been committed in the UK.
I think it’s an AI voice because if he was British he wouldn’t be using American laws or dollars but I could be wrong and maybe he’s just making it easier for American viewers😂
The reckless endangerment charge for Victor in the Church could be dropped with a good lawyer as the bolt of his rifle was in the rear position rendering it "safe"
Having said that, he is also breaking the firearms act (uk), as he is carrying a firearm in a public place, and has ammunition on his person, and had just negligently discharged the weapon
8:14 actually, throughout the film, ginger wears one of these collars. And the number reads “983”. And the chicken in the back before Frizzle and Molly went down the tunnel, their number read “920”. So, it should be animal cruelty X983.
The mustached frog: second sexual assault is actually assault and battery, since he was fighting Rita, not sexually forcing himself on her. The Toad: how's that sexual assault? He grabbed Rita, but not with sexual intent. Victor: assault and battery; animal abuse for caging Grommit; deliberately causing mass hysteria might be counted as hooliganism, or intimidation\ terrorism or something; assault (both verbal and physical in the scene where he insults the giant rabbit and uses a rake on the woman); attempted marriage fraud with future embezzlement (he was going to marry a woman for her money); since Victor's dog and Grommit are both dogs, does it count as animal cruelty? We can argue that it is, given that Victor ordered his dog to attack Grommit, but we can argue that it's not, since the dog is shown to be sentient, and thus made its own decisions. Mrs. Tweedy: animal cruelty only works with the last couple of scenes and maybe the brainwashing. Otherwise, she's running an meat factory, so it's to be expected that she'd be butchering the chickens, which aren't regarded as sentient beings (until the very end).
Victor Quartermaine can not be charged with reckless endangerment as the rifle he was holding was not loaded, the "bolt" was pulled back meaning the chamber was empty.
I believe this video is based on UK laws, so OSHA would probably not apply (but I may be wrong) If there is a UK variant of OSHA, then maybe then she can face charges under those laws.
I know for sure that Mrs. Tweedy would get done for the health violation of throwing chickens straight into a meat grinder with the collars on them. Those nuggets would contain bits of glass, plastics & wires, as well as inedible parts from chickens. All her products would get recalled. Also, considering her farm appears to be set in a more modern setting, she would be charged for animal cruelty for keeping the chickens in what is basically a PG battery farm.
@amandamakin1542 Some very good points, though technically this isn't Battery Hens by any definition (they aren't in cages for instance), rather the original film would technically meet Free Range (ironically) if the Chickens were provided grass in their farm & generally treated better. The 2nd film though... not sure what that's classifiable as, as it's insane 😆
@@jimtaylor294 I did mean the 2nd film's chicken farm when I said it was a battery farm. The first one does ironically meet most of the standards of a free range farm like you said. While they are not in cages, their treatment in "Happy" Hen Farms is questionable.
Oh! For Mrs. Tweedy! Don’t forget all the lives that were endangered when the factory was destroyed! She had a lot of workers and employees that you see throughout the movie. Some of which were attacked and rendered vulnerable, probably causing them to die when the factory was destroyed by Ginger and her friends/family.
Its funny that mrs tweedys “base” went from a prison camp inspired by the great escape and was replaced by one insoired by every supervillain base inspired by on her majestys secret service
@@jimtaylor294 thinking about it more it s seeming like that would only be an assault charge, since he could lock her in the greenhouse since Wallace broke one of the walls
And inaccurate. First two weren't even his, but his minion's. Also, his minion's second, and his own weren't even _sexual_ assaults, just regular ones.
You could put Illegal discharge of a Firearm up for Victor, as he opened fire over multiple other properties and it’s set in the uk which you can’t openly discharge firearms. Of which he does multiple times.
During the church scene when Viktor shot his rifle to get the townspeople's attention, he knocked a gargoyle of and it almost crushed his dog. So on top of the now doubled reckless endangerment, he also committed property damage.
I would like to point out the assault on the guard was an accident so leaving the scene of an accident charge would be more accurate. And all the charges for the mine and the le frog Shou be on them as they were technically doing there attacks on there own. And sense there tongue are basically weapons you could get them on unlawful use of weapons charges. Also Tweety should probably get an abuse charge for abusing her husbands and maybe a cohersion charge for forsing them to do what she wants without considering them or there safety.
I didn't think about this but even though the tsunami at 3:18 was frozen, if that melts there will be massive damage, a dam or a careful melting process would have to be done to absolve this, I don't know how the Law works but He should also have a hefty fine too for the insane cost that a dam would take to build, then again he's already comitted a federal crime..
Hi Animated Courtroom! Watching this video made me want to re-watch the Aardman Movies, they look really good! And it's so fun seeing the villains get karma. I hope one day you'll do a "If Will Vinton Claymation Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes" with Leonard Llmabean [California Raisins Sold Out and The California Raisins Show], Willshire Pig [Claymation Easter], and the villains from The California Raisins Show. They are some very underrated villains IMO.
Given the size and location within a forest of the tree Victor cuts down, I imagine there's probably some additional sanctions beyond the initial fine for the assessed age of the tree and whether that forest is protected. Cutting down trees that have been around longer than your grandparents is a huge shame, especially when done for petty reasons.
1) I didn't know there was a sequel to Chicken Run! 2) HOW IS MRS. TWEEDY NOT DEAD!? She got crushed by the barn door in the first movie and then she got ground up in the nugget maker! Hopefully, that explosion did her in.
Can you please do if Animated Disney Channel Villains were sentenced for their crimes? Bill Cipher (Gravity Falls), The Core (Amphibia), Emperor Bellos (The Owl House).
on my list, problem is, i will probably have to do only movies, otherwise it will take 40+ hours of work per villain. Due to having to download and edit all episodes
If Open Season Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes Case 1: Shaw (Open Season 1 + Open Season Scared Silly) Case 2: Fifi (Open Season 2) Case 3: Doug (Open Season 3)
A big problem is that Shaw did most of his things legally. The only thing I can think of that was suspect was Elliot, but the claim that Elliot, who couldn't tell anyone who could charge Shaw the truth thanks to them not understanding him, ran in front of his truck would give him a bit of leeway. Every other action was either in his own home (when he stalked Boog in his house), or during the titular Open Season, where he was perfectly allowed to hunt in the area he was hunting in. It's not illegal to believe crazy theories, after all. Edit: Did a bit of reading on TV Tropes, he performed several counts of reckless driving when he tried to run down Elliot in town, including almost hitting a small child and hopping the curb onto the sidewalk. With Fifi, well... Fifi was a dog. A domestic dog. While he *did* try to kill wild animals, dogs aren't usually charged for things like that. And Doug is a bear, even a trained circus bear, who was a bit of a dick to other animals. The problem is that Humans are the deciding factor in these things, but humans wouldn't charge animals for fighting animals. Most that would happen is that the forest would be locked down because of the odd behavior of the fauna, but even the one human villain was still in the clear because the animals can't communicate that they are as smart as they are.
I think you're missing one of Wallace and Grommit's villains, I can't remember her name, but her whole gimmick was of a "black widow" she would charm men and make them fall in love of them, then she would get them to put her on their will and finally she would murder them, she tired that with Wallace which is 1st degree attempted murder and it's implied she did the same with several others, which essentially turns her into a serial killer, if you already covered her, please tell me, I would be interested on seeing the video, if you haven't done so yet, I hope you do in the future
1) Being married doesn't overrule assault laws (in fact, it rather adds to the perceived severity, at least from the POV of the justice system, as your closeness to the victim is being negated in favour of the act) 2) He clearly cares, he just doesn't feel able do anything about it. He's scared of his wife, and just does as she says. That's, like, one of the main gimmicks of his character
Victor didn’t commit reckless endangerment when he flagged the church goers becoming the chamber on his rifle was obviously empty and opened, did when he shot a round into the air though
For that reckless endangerment charge for victor when he had his “by a hunter line” would it actually count he is using a bolt action rifle and has pulled back the bolt so it can’t fire. Sure still stuipd following the rules of gun useage but not 100% it would count
4:01 I think the sentence should be lower because, he is pointing a clearly empty gun at them. He pulled back the bolt, the empty cartage came out, but he never put the bolt forward.
Regardless, considering he is openly violating one of the many rules of gun safety, it'd still be grounds for a sanction, if not an inspection on whether or not he's adept to carry a firearm
Not sure how the tongue scenes count as "sexual assault", I mean what Le Frog did when complimenting Rita's beauty would be considered as such, but still.
3:193:20 If The Toad was successful in this part then Everyone in that city would had actually died due to how big that tsunami is so I would give him 1 more life and death sentence as an extra!.
Not exactly sure how killing the chicken that didn't lay eggs is "perfectly fine", other than "one mouth less to feed" kind of thing. Surely that, in the chicken's POV, it might be considered 1st(?) degree murder, right?
@@theowilds3778 maybe but my brother worked in egg farm before for 2 years. An this is kinda common a chicken that does not produce eggs anymore or produces less eggs. They get shipped-off to a slaughter house and some of them become dinner. While others can be used for breeding if they can to produce a next generation of chickens.
Does it count as specifically animal cruelty if it's dog on dog? Isn't that just assault? That would be like human on human assault being considered human cruelty
Actually, the frog wouldn’t get the death sentence, as since it is sort of set in Britain, we abolished the death penalty. So in reality, the frog would serve a whole life tariff
Whoa, Whoa Woah! You Got The Currency Wrong In This Sentencing Video. That’s British Pounds, Not American Dollars. Tulip Bell Showed Me Why And I Suggest You’ll Do The Same. I mean, Honestly. WickedBinge Did That Before Tulip Bell, Others & You. I’ll Betcha You Can Do That Cinema Sentencing Style & Such.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 80 | คู่เอก "รักษ์ vs ยอดนำชัย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ckLMRorsMeY/mqdefault.jpg)
Due to Copyrights, A part of chicken run 1 had to be removed.
Mrs Tweedy basically does some animal cruelty for trying to end gingers life.
☕I now have a Buy Me A Coffee page on which you can support me :D
www.buymeacoffee.com/animatedcourtroom
Ok its fine
If PBS villains were charged for their crimes?
You forgot about Shaun the sheep the movie there they have an animal control guy even though he's doing his job but he does do things that are considered criminal the sheep do some small minor criminal activity and the pigs at the very beginning do some minor criminal activity as well and Arthur Christmas there's no villains in the film but they do some small minor criminal Acts they're good people and yes these are both aardman movies
You mean Anthony trumper and agent red that's thier name
Could you do Muppet Villains?
The irony is that Mrs. Tweedy runs a pretty ethical chicken farm. Her chickens are well-fed, not injected with hormones, have plenty of room to run around, and even have recreational activities.
The 2nd film, not so much.
Yea, you can say that for the first movie, but definitely not the second
Technically, the only thing you could get Mrs Tweedy on would be Domestic Abuse and Food Standards Agency violations (Those pies and nuggets would have been contaminated beyond belief).
Sadly that is true. And that is insane
either way, Mrs Tweedy would be fully out of business, likely for good and possibly not allowed anywhere near any food-related business
But yet those nuggets look delicious
Spencer has a point. A Macerator [the machine in the first film] are used to dispose of unwanted male chick's & unfit for consumption females; they aren't used re' chicken for consumption 😂 .
(though the company that sold the Tweedy's the machine are also liable for fraud, as the company clearly altered & marketed Macerators for a purpose likely to endanger Public Health.
The nuggets, especially. Not only is it false advertising (being made from battery hens that are brainwashed, & being the whole chicken blended, containing feathers, eyeballs, brain, blood, etc.), those nuggets would contain fragments of glass, wires & plastic from those collars, which is a serious health violation.
Food containing bits of inedible content will immediately get recalled, & if they find it in every single product, investigations & a potential company shutdown could happen.
The factory is also an OSHA violation, as someone could easily fall off into the meat grinder, as seen with Melissa Tweedy. That is a guaranteed factory shutdown.
With the frog you could charge him with attempted genocide as he was operating under the presumption that they were the only rats in the world
Technically mrs tweedy made the chicken pies with a machine and marketed them off as homemade, which I think should be under false advertisement
i would agree with you but a lot of factory made pies, tend to follow a set recipe passed down that was originally homemade, like say KFC chicken was at one point homemade but got commercialized and mass-production. Plus in a technical sense this was in her home i.e in the barn and not a factory complex. So in a way it still counts as homemade.
@@silentecho92able I feel lied to by every company that makes food ever since I read that
@@GeckoTech_Engineer a lot of companies lie anyway some of them say for example say there vegetables are non-GMO. But most of them are obviously full of crap. Hence way its often better to buy the real organic grown stuff at local smaller family owned stores or farmers market where you can get the real organic ones.
That is also a technicality as her pies were made In a factory on her farm hence home made literally
@@mtgmead4480 I feel like we should change the meaning of homemade
Minor thing: Victor's charges would need to be altered, as locking up Grommit without the permission of Wallace, his legal owner, that's petnapping and animal cruelty. Unless that is the case, then any actions taken by *his* dog can't be attributed to him.
Either the dog is it's own person, letting him get in trouble for False Imprisonment, but removing the charges based on the dog's actions, or it's not, removing the false imprisonment, but letting him be charged for different crimes and for the actions of his own dog.
i think with victor putting the tree in the road also counts as disrupting the flow of traffic
Not to mention potentially Vandalism & Malicious Destruction of Property 🤔 .
(the Tree belongs to either a nearby estate or to the government/monarch; time was that [for instance] poaching on royal lands in England carried the death penalty)
Perhaps base it on UK law, not US law. Aardman is a British company, after all, and most of the movies are based in the UK for a large part of it. The reason I say this is because you included the death sentence in one, but there is no death penalty in the UK. It was abolished decades ago.
We have to consider the time period; Chicken Run for example was set in 1962. We can determine this from the fact Dion DiMucci's track "The Wanderer" is still receiving radio airplay on the Light Programme - the track was released in November 1961, suggesting the film is set in the spring and summer of 1962.
Mrs. Tweedy not dead surprises me. Having a door fall on her, bring turned into a giant nugget, and zapped by lasers. She must be immortal
Mrs. Tweedy is aware that chickens are sentient near the end of the first movie, so any crime committed against them in the second film would have to be counted as a similar crime against humanity. Attempted murder, kidnapping, false imprisonment, etc.
Those flashbacks of her fight against the protagonist of the first film are proof.
I do love Quartermaine's character. I especially love the line "I can't have your money but I can still bag your bunny" I love watching him.
EDIT: I think you did say in which countries these sentences are applied later in the video but the sentencing is all over the place as we don't have 2nd degree in the UK, its called Manslaughter. Just want a bit of clarity :)
Which countries laws are you basing it? You sound like you have a British accent and if I was being technical here most of these "crimes" have been committed in the UK.
I think it’s an AI voice because if he was British he wouldn’t be using American laws or dollars but I could be wrong and maybe he’s just making it easier for American viewers😂
Fun fact: I have chicken run and flushed away both on DVD
I just have Flushed Away on DVD
@@SonicMorningstar_YT nice but chicken run isn’t that expensive on Amazon
@@Holyflicks*thank you for precious information that has not been accounted for before in my knowledge*
The reckless endangerment charge for Victor in the Church could be dropped with a good lawyer as the bolt of his rifle was in the rear position rendering it "safe"
Having said that, he is also breaking the firearms act (uk), as he is carrying a firearm in a public place, and has ammunition on his person, and had just negligently discharged the weapon
Amazing how the FROG of the trio has the worst sentencing among even the other two humans combined. What a wacky world we live in.
8:14 actually, throughout the film, ginger wears one of these collars. And the number reads “983”. And the chicken in the back before Frizzle and Molly went down the tunnel, their number read “920”. So, it should be animal cruelty X983.
The mustached frog: second sexual assault is actually assault and battery, since he was fighting Rita, not sexually forcing himself on her.
The Toad: how's that sexual assault? He grabbed Rita, but not with sexual intent.
Victor: assault and battery; animal abuse for caging Grommit; deliberately causing mass hysteria might be counted as hooliganism, or intimidation\ terrorism or something; assault (both verbal and physical in the scene where he insults the giant rabbit and uses a rake on the woman); attempted marriage fraud with future embezzlement (he was going to marry a woman for her money); since Victor's dog and Grommit are both dogs, does it count as animal cruelty? We can argue that it is, given that Victor ordered his dog to attack Grommit, but we can argue that it's not, since the dog is shown to be sentient, and thus made its own decisions.
Mrs. Tweedy: animal cruelty only works with the last couple of scenes and maybe the brainwashing. Otherwise, she's running an meat factory, so it's to be expected that she'd be butchering the chickens, which aren't regarded as sentient beings (until the very end).
2:53
Sacré bleu! The mime spoke!
I guess it was painful, the mime frog broke his vow of silence. Also you do know mimes off work speak, otherwise phones and such are useless.🤨
@@theowilds3778 I’m aware.
Wait, the translation of _sacrè bleu_ is "damn it"? At least according to Google. Damn, here I was thinking it was equivalent to my gosh 😅
The insert coins scene is such a hilarious scene
If Animated Courtroom Is UNDERATTED...
👇
Your talking about adult movies and shows
Indeed, there aren't enough rats there.
Victor Quartermaine can not be charged with reckless endangerment as the rifle he was holding was not loaded, the "bolt" was pulled back meaning the chamber was empty.
Still he is causing fear and alarm in the public which is a crime in the UK, he is also guilty of armed trespass.
There's no chargin' VICTOR QUARTERMAINE!!!!
Now hold on, the two goons in flushed away survive being iced so its only attempted murder
Technically the toads grand larceny charge doesn’t count. The rubys proven to be fake after roddy smashed it with ease, it give that a theft charge
What about OSHA violations by Mrs Tweedy?
I believe this video is based on UK laws, so OSHA would probably not apply (but I may be wrong)
If there is a UK variant of OSHA, then maybe then she can face charges under those laws.
I know for sure that Mrs. Tweedy would get done for the health violation of throwing chickens straight into a meat grinder with the collars on them.
Those nuggets would contain bits of glass, plastics & wires, as well as inedible parts from chickens. All her products would get recalled.
Also, considering her farm appears to be set in a more modern setting, she would be charged for animal cruelty for keeping the chickens in what is basically a PG battery farm.
@@amandamakin1542 Yes I've wondered about that myself.
@amandamakin1542 Some very good points, though technically this isn't Battery Hens by any definition (they aren't in cages for instance), rather the original film would technically meet Free Range (ironically) if the Chickens were provided grass in their farm & generally treated better.
The 2nd film though... not sure what that's classifiable as, as it's insane 😆
@@jimtaylor294 I did mean the 2nd film's chicken farm when I said it was a battery farm. The first one does ironically meet most of the standards of a free range farm like you said.
While they are not in cages, their treatment in "Happy" Hen Farms is questionable.
10:10
Mr tweedy 2.0:opens the door on coworker
Animated courtroom: “FINED FOR ASSULT!”
Oh! For Mrs. Tweedy! Don’t forget all the lives that were endangered when the factory was destroyed! She had a lot of workers and employees that you see throughout the movie. Some of which were attacked and rendered vulnerable, probably causing them to die when the factory was destroyed by Ginger and her friends/family.
You forgot Victor's property damage because he shot the gargoyle off the church.
He also forgot other crimes like stalking, trespassing, home invasion , coercion, fraud, conspiracy and theft.
Its funny that mrs tweedys “base” went from a prison camp inspired by the great escape and was replaced by one insoired by every supervillain base inspired by on her majestys secret service
5:47 I wouldn’t say it is false imprisonment but more likely as assault with a deadly weapon.
What about both?
Not to mention, this is Great Britain; it's Unlawful Imprisonment / Detainment, or just Common Assault.
@@jimtaylor294 thinking about it more it s seeming like that would only be an assault charge, since he could lock her in the greenhouse since Wallace broke one of the walls
Ms tweedy: nah I'd turn you into food💀
Mrs. Tweedy will never come back to another sequel after Dawn of the Nugget, there's no why she could've survived that!!!
Dawn of the nugget
Dawn of the nugget.
*cough cough* Dawn of the Nugget *cough*
They said another sequal. Not refering to Dawn of the Nugget.
@@ZardMasterRay64 I meant after Chicken Run II
The fact that Toad keeps getting charged with sexual assault is creepy AF
And inaccurate. First two weren't even his, but his minion's. Also, his minion's second, and his own weren't even _sexual_ assaults, just regular ones.
Hey you can't count as animal abuse, because that's how chicken nuggets are made 9:21
Very Accurate,Sentences For These Villains.
No one would get the death penalty because we don't have it.
1950's/'60's Britain: *ahem, we do actually*
You could put Illegal discharge of a Firearm up for Victor, as he opened fire over multiple other properties and it’s set in the uk which you can’t openly discharge firearms. Of which he does multiple times.
During the church scene when Viktor shot his rifle to get the townspeople's attention, he knocked a gargoyle of and it almost crushed his dog. So on top of the now doubled reckless endangerment, he also committed property damage.
I would like to point out the assault on the guard was an accident so leaving the scene of an accident charge would be more accurate.
And all the charges for the mine and the le frog Shou be on them as they were technically doing there attacks on there own. And sense there tongue are basically weapons you could get them on unlawful use of weapons charges.
Also Tweety should probably get an abuse charge for abusing her husbands and maybe a cohersion charge for forsing them to do what she wants without considering them or there safety.
All of these films were bangers ngl
I didn't think about this but even though the tsunami at 3:18 was frozen, if that melts there will be massive damage, a dam or a careful melting process would have to be done to absolve this, I don't know how the Law works but He should also have a hefty fine too for the insane cost that a dam would take to build, then again he's already comitted a federal crime..
Hi Animated Courtroom! Watching this video made me want to re-watch the Aardman Movies, they look really good! And it's so fun seeing the villains get karma. I hope one day you'll do a "If Will Vinton Claymation Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes" with Leonard Llmabean [California Raisins Sold Out and The California Raisins Show], Willshire Pig [Claymation Easter], and the villains from The California Raisins Show. They are some very underrated villains IMO.
Given the size and location within a forest of the tree Victor cuts down, I imagine there's probably some additional sanctions beyond the initial fine for the assessed age of the tree and whether that forest is protected. Cutting down trees that have been around longer than your grandparents is a huge shame, especially when done for petty reasons.
So the toad gets executed and victor will suffer the rest of his life in prison. Mrs tweedy will be out of jail in 15.75 years.
True true I’ve committed 57 war crimes. The reason I didn’t get the death sentence yet I’m actively running from the FBI.
6:15 The funniest bit of the video
1) I didn't know there was a sequel to Chicken Run!
2) HOW IS MRS. TWEEDY NOT DEAD!? She got crushed by the barn door in the first movie and then she got ground up in the nugget maker! Hopefully, that explosion did her in.
With Victor, does the UK not have any specific laws for the unlawful discharge of a firearm?
Mr doctor fry s Voice its exactly like marge Simpson.
R.I.P. Peter Sallis
Question how is it sexual assault when the frog holds up reta to throw her off it would just be attempted murder
I think some of those false imprisonment charges should be swapped out with straight up abduction/kidnapping.
"Ice them. Ice them both."
Where have I heard this before.
What about Le frog? Sure he's not a main antagonist but he still did evil things.
I'm surprise that only one person got the death penalty and longest prison time as a toad😂😂😂
In the next one cane you do Shaun the sheep?
I agree because Shaun the sheep is my favourite cartoon when I was a kid
3:53 Also property damage because that first shot destroys a statue on the church.
Can you please do if Animated Disney Channel Villains were sentenced for their crimes?
Bill Cipher (Gravity Falls), The Core (Amphibia), Emperor Bellos (The Owl House).
on my list, problem is, i will probably have to do only movies, otherwise it will take 40+ hours of work per villain. Due to having to download and edit all episodes
@@AnimatedCourtroomWouldn’t have to be all of them. The villains don’t really appear in every episode.
He seriously said the nuggets look tasty😂
If Open Season Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes
Case 1: Shaw (Open Season 1 + Open Season Scared Silly)
Case 2: Fifi (Open Season 2)
Case 3: Doug (Open Season 3)
A big problem is that Shaw did most of his things legally. The only thing I can think of that was suspect was Elliot, but the claim that Elliot, who couldn't tell anyone who could charge Shaw the truth thanks to them not understanding him, ran in front of his truck would give him a bit of leeway. Every other action was either in his own home (when he stalked Boog in his house), or during the titular Open Season, where he was perfectly allowed to hunt in the area he was hunting in. It's not illegal to believe crazy theories, after all.
Edit: Did a bit of reading on TV Tropes, he performed several counts of reckless driving when he tried to run down Elliot in town, including almost hitting a small child and hopping the curb onto the sidewalk.
With Fifi, well... Fifi was a dog. A domestic dog. While he *did* try to kill wild animals, dogs aren't usually charged for things like that.
And Doug is a bear, even a trained circus bear, who was a bit of a dick to other animals.
The problem is that Humans are the deciding factor in these things, but humans wouldn't charge animals for fighting animals. Most that would happen is that the forest would be locked down because of the odd behavior of the fauna, but even the one human villain was still in the clear because the animals can't communicate that they are as smart as they are.
what if Jonah Jameson was charged for his crimes and bender from futurama charged for his crimes and Toon patrol from who famed roger rabbit
6:00
the red baron has died
3:21 also I count that as 1st degree attempted genocide, since he attempted to kill a large population of rats with that colossal wave of drainage.
2:24 the face the frog made was perfect timing 😂
I think you're missing one of Wallace and Grommit's villains, I can't remember her name, but her whole gimmick was of a "black widow" she would charm men and make them fall in love of them, then she would get them to put her on their will and finally she would murder them, she tired that with Wallace which is 1st degree attempted murder and it's implied she did the same with several others, which essentially turns her into a serial killer, if you already covered her, please tell me, I would be interested on seeing the video, if you haven't done so yet, I hope you do in the future
The bake-o-light gal
7:21 they are married and he doesn't care
Is it that he doesn't care, though? Or is he just too far under her thumb to stand up about it?
1) Being married doesn't overrule assault laws (in fact, it rather adds to the perceived severity, at least from the POV of the justice system, as your closeness to the victim is being negated in favour of the act)
2) He clearly cares, he just doesn't feel able do anything about it. He's scared of his wife, and just does as she says. That's, like, one of the main gimmicks of his character
Victor didn’t commit reckless endangerment when he flagged the church goers becoming the chamber on his rifle was obviously empty and opened, did when he shot a round into the air though
For that reckless endangerment charge for victor when he had his “by a hunter line” would it actually count he is using a bolt action rifle and has pulled back the bolt so it can’t fire. Sure still stuipd following the rules of gun useage but not 100% it would count
The frogs are definetly not 6'10
Mrs Tweedy is seven feet tall 💀
4:01 I think the sentence should be lower because, he is pointing a clearly empty gun at them. He pulled back the bolt, the empty cartage came out, but he never put the bolt forward.
Regardless, considering he is openly violating one of the many rules of gun safety, it'd still be grounds for a sanction, if not an inspection on whether or not he's adept to carry a firearm
We mustn’t panic! WE MUSTN’T PANIC!
Not sure how the tongue scenes count as "sexual assault", I mean what Le Frog did when complimenting Rita's beauty would be considered as such, but still.
1:16-1:39 Also I think 20 is the minimum of the Toad's 2nd degree murders.
2:18-2:22 kidding hand = sexual assault.✔
2:38-2:43 gross tongue slapping = sexual assault.❌
2:56-3:00 gross tongue lasso grap = sexual assault.❌
What about dinner boss
So I'm assuming that trying to murder chickens while they flew away in a chicken made airplane in the first movie isn't a crime?
Would there be a crime for the iron cross on the dog's plane?
983 chickens actually
Anyone else not know there was a chicken run 2 out 😅?
3:19 3:20 If The Toad was successful in this part then Everyone in that city would had actually died due to how big that tsunami is so I would give him 1 more life and death sentence as an extra!.
Chicken number 314 is pi(π) which you got chicken pies logo said "pies" from chicken run
Out of curiosity, what was the "1 year" sentence for at the beginning of Mrs. Tweety's crimes, the chicken's enclosure or...?
Not exactly sure how killing the chicken that didn't lay eggs is "perfectly fine", other than "one mouth less to feed" kind of thing.
Surely that, in the chicken's POV, it might be considered 1st(?) degree murder, right?
@@theowilds3778 maybe but my brother worked in egg farm before for 2 years. An this is kinda common a chicken that does not produce eggs anymore or produces less eggs. They get shipped-off to a slaughter house and some of them become dinner. While others can be used for breeding if they can to produce a next generation of chickens.
Does it count as specifically animal cruelty if it's dog on dog? Isn't that just assault? That would be like human on human assault being considered human cruelty
i also charged mrs teedy murder for chopping chickens head of
I didn't even know, that there was another Chicken Run movie out there, when did that one come out?
Last year😂
Its on netflix , went a little under the radar i think
But is it animal curelty if the one strangling Gromit is another dog?
He should have counted that😂
You're right they should have counted that😂
They should have counted that😂
If the Toad wanted all rodents gone I consider this attempted Genocide which would give Toad the death penalty.
Bourjoy
In the UK we have pounds not dollars
Wil be corrected in newer videos!🫡
Didn’t you already do Victor Quartermaine?
True, bit it fit in both videos and made some mistakes
How does a toad or frog get 23 LIFE SENTENCES LIKE HUH
WAS THERE A SECOND CHICKEN RUN MOVIE?!?!?!
Yup haha just released
10:10 The collar said 983, therefore it's more than 505 that was said at 8:14
What about… the Penguin
We leave right now
Why?
We leave in 5 hours
Actually, the frog wouldn’t get the death sentence, as since it is sort of set in Britain, we abolished the death penalty. So in reality, the frog would serve a whole life tariff
I've already done Aardman villains, letting you know you missed a lot of charges.
Whoa, Whoa Woah! You Got The Currency Wrong In This Sentencing Video.
That’s British Pounds, Not American Dollars.
Tulip Bell Showed Me Why And I Suggest You’ll Do The Same.
I mean, Honestly. WickedBinge Did That Before Tulip Bell, Others & You.
I’ll Betcha You Can Do That Cinema Sentencing Style & Such.
What about the nuggets they taste good
Ok
We get it
I hope the toad gets made into frog legs
Shouldn't have been normal assault 6:58
4:00 I don't think it's reckless endangerment even if he is waving his gun at people because there is no round chamered
3361 klasky csupos for toad
224 for maine
16 for tweedy