@@luke250829 First, he allows questions from even foreign journalists . Second, he goes on for hours I think over three. You think all those questions are vetted?
So Putin wants Ukraine to give up territories (four complete oblasts) which are not even occupied by russian army today! Option three: Putin flees in summer 2025, when the oligarchs are fed up with him and take the power.
Apart from a threat of the use of nuclear weapons, what negotiating position does Putin have? How does he deal with a firm no: leave Ukraine, which includes Crimea?
That he’ll keep going - he’s relying on the west esp to wish the war would go away, and lots of his actions are to try and engender the fear “he could do anything” but obv as time has gone on - the range of horrible things he can do has become finite and no more than what he is doing. There are no tricks left … I’m sure the reason why he’s been bombing civilian cities in Ukraine is not because there’s any benefit from it whatsoever - but to underscore a belief he does terrible things so he could really do terrible things … making himself be perceived as scarily as he can as that suits him as setting opponents in the best frame of mind from his perspective. The snag is we’ve all grown tired of those games, and the west realises other than size, the Russian army is fairly “meh”. They can’t obviously increase the level of what they’re doing. They’re doing all they can. They’ve similarly for decades tried to engender a belief in other counties that they are very competent and very scary. All those psychology games aren’t being backed up by what they’ve managed however. The only other thing he can do is hope he can get trump to see that if Ukraine are forced to capitulate, Putin will allow trump to claim he stopped the war, so trump is popular domestically … snag is for Putin ,trump’s ego is large so doesn’t obviously need Putin….
Well, unfortunately the economy and equipment reserve still hold some longer, he has all these NK soldiers. On the other hand Ukrainian do not want to fight anymore, escape the draft and cannot manage to train enough soldiers. With the lack of Western support Ukrainian line might break, and then game over.
a) None whatsoever. b) By visibly raising the nuclear readiness level, i.e. starting a nuclear 'chicken game', while counting on the average Westerner to be degenerate enough to not come out and play.
He deals with it by saying "make me", knowing well the lack of appetite for that in the west. After all Ukraine doesn't have the manpower and equipment to win those territories back by force without unaffordable casualty numbers, while NATO doesn't want to get involved much more than the current level either. So Ukraine's only viable strategy for total victory is to keep striking Russia's economy until it can no longer even afford the military to hold onto the occupied territory, but that will take a few more years.
@@tobiasrietveld3819BRICS look it up, 45% of the world gdp 3% more than the g7 46 % of the world’s population in BRICS countries USA 4% Russia gdp will be up 4% over last year,India up 7%, USA gdp up by 2.8%
@@joewoodchuck3824 I suppose you voted for him. You won't see the life getting any better in the long run for his many voters that are hoping that he would make their lives just that. If the medias can secure a GOP re-election at a free election four years from now, they will do so. If they can't, the election will be rigged.
@@Marvin-dg8vj Putin's army advances a few miles every month at huge cost, he doesn't even control the 4 oblasts he declared as Russian. Are you not a little bit embarrassed?
Russia is not losing-not now, not in the foreseeable future, and definitely not in the next few months. While Ukraine has mounted significant resistance, and the war has had a heavy toll on Russia, Russia still has the capability to win this conflict, and it hasn't even been forced to go all-in yet. The difference here is that Russia can mobilize far more resources and manpower if it feels truly threatened, which is something that Ukraine simply cannot match. Russia has held back from full-scale mobilization because they don’t feel sufficiently threatened to warrant it. Why would they sacrifice their civilian economy and push the country into a total war state when they believe they can still achieve their goals without it? In a limited conflict, Russia has the edge. They are not in the same position as Ukraine, which is already operating under severe limitations, having already mobilized nearly everything it can. Now, let’s talk about mobilization. Russia has demonstrated time and time again that, when necessary, they can scale up their forces dramatically. Russia can mobilize up to 1-2 million men, and they can keep this up for years if needed. And unlike Ukraine, which has reached its limits on mobilization, Russia can continue ramping up its forces year after year, whether it's 500,000 men per year or up to a million. This would drastically increase Russia’s forces, further tipping the scales in their favor. To put this in perspective, if Russia were to fully mobilize, they could push their forces into the millions-a scale we haven’t seen in modern conflicts. Realistically, we’re talking about mobilizing 5, 6, or even 7 million men. This could happen within the next few years, making the war resemble World War II in scale. This isn’t just about numbers, though. The resources Russia can tap into are practically unlimited compared to Ukraine. Russia has vast reserves of artillery, ammunition, equipment, and most importantly, manpower. And while a total war would undoubtedly strain Russia’s economy, it would be less humiliating than losing. In fact, the consequences of Russia’s full mobilization would be severe, but the consequences of losing the war and letting Ukraine expel them from Crimea or the Donbas would be far worse-for both Russia’s prestige and for Putin personally. Ukraine is already operating under a total war economy, but it’s already stretched beyond its limits. It has been mobilizing older men and people who are less fit to fight. The war effort is putting massive strain on its economy. If Ukraine had to keep increasing mobilization, they’d soon be facing even older, less capable soldiers, making their efforts unsustainable. On the other hand, Russia still has the ability to field fresh recruits and draw from a far larger pool of reserves-an advantage Ukraine can’t match. Now, in a total war economy, GDP doesn’t matter as much as people think. In total war, the focus shifts from sustaining civilian life to producing war material at any cost. We saw this in World War II, where the Soviet Union operated for months with almost zero GDP, yet still managed to recover and out-produce its enemies. The key is how much physical material your economy can make to fuel the war effort. For example, if people are starving to death but the country can produce two more tanks instead of food, that’s what matters in total war. The war economy focuses on raw output rather than civilian well-being. Russia can go into a full mobilization mode and sacrifice its civilian economy for military production, and still sustain the war effort over an extended period. In summary, Russia is not losing, and it won’t lose anytime soon. If they decide to escalate, the scales will tip massively in their favor. Ukraine’s ability to continue this war is already limited, and once Russia starts fully mobilizing, there’s simply no way Ukraine can compete. The potential consequences for Ukraine are catastrophic, and no peace deal would be kind to them. Russia can wait. And if necessary, they can make the war go on much longer. The only question is whether the West will continue to support Ukraine and for how long. Without that support, the reality of total war in Ukraine becomes inevitable, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.
@@Ubesoft-vc5teThe Russian IS in full scale war mode, they don't even have enough men to fill factory jobs, inflation over 9%and been growing for over 2 years, interest rates up to 23%, Ruble crashing heavily... ohhhh they totally have it under control hahahaha Don't forget about all the Russian of fighting age leaving to live in Bali and Thailand. Why you think they need North Korean help... Hmmmm
I respect this former Russian PM. But I did not hear him answer the question of what happens to the Kursk Oblast and any other Russian land that Ukraine now occupies? After Ukraine invade Kursk on Aug 6th, 2024 (BTW, the 79th Anniversary of Hiroshima), Putin gave "orders" to expel the Ukrainians "immediately". Then, he said "by October 1st". Now, around early December, he says "I can't give a date!".
A sit down discussion about all the subjects that properly run a nation, with the thousands of intricate details between President Putin/ Sergey Lavrov and Brandon/ Boris Johnson. Say no more.
The audio in this video is absolutely horrid. As if the Russian accent isn't bad enough, the room that this person, being interviewed, is in obviously has hardwood floors which creates a lot of echo. And they seem to jump back & forth a bit, trading English words for Russian ones; or maybe that's just the horridity of the audio.
Morpheus, his Russian accent is so strong even a child could tell he is Russian. What is your excuse? Are you deaf, or just in denial that he is actually who he says he is?
Quantity over quality. Puketin surely likes the sound of his own voice. One man. One odd twisted man pulls all the political, social and financial strings, whilst the citizenry tremble.
I watched his speech and didn’t get the impression he was hiding nerves with empty threats but I’m just and impartial observer and not a propaganda channel like Times Radio.
Vladolf Putin had every question given in advance. Nothing was open. Leaders in democracies (Europe/Japan/Canada/Australia) are able to answer without choosing questions.
The British certainly have choices. If you don't like them you are free to start a new party. But you've chosen an election system that doesn't give a precise representation of the voters in parliament. May I suggest you take a look at the Scandinavian countries.
@@jensstergard9380just accept that your system failed to deliver and you are no better than any other corrupt regime in your neighborhood..stop falling for propaganda.
@@jensstergard9380 I was borh there and served in the Royal Marines in the Falklands War and Northern Ireland.Then there were stark choices between Mrs Thatcher and Mr Foot.What I was referring to is that now both major parties are almost indistinguishable in their policies.
@ we shall see. My eyes have been wide open. It would be best for you to think for yourself and not let your puppet masters control your thinking. I know that sounds difficult but only you can save yourself from mental slavery.
Nonsense! Your right to express your opinion freely here is under threat. If D. Trump wants to defend the democratic world, he can do so. If he doesn't the US won't loose just because democracy moves towards an end.
@@MorpheusOnethe conflict in Ukraine is a proxy war of the USA one of the goals was to weaken Russia to the point of collapse Despite the western media misinforming their viewers, the proxy war is a failure It has strengthened the BRICS trading within the participating nations and continues to weaken trade deals between BRICS countries and G7 countries BRICS has surpassed G7 in GDP and the gap will continue to grow as more countries join This failed proxy war is another sign of the crumbling US empire
Ukraine 🇺🇦 No surrender. 😊
It is time for Swan Lake to be played on Russian National TV.
No talks with the Russians. Never.
Why? You do realize what the end product looks like don’t you?
Study the actual history of US presidents, you will see what actual villainy looks like
Russians have never seen a journalist ask Putin a difficult question.
the BBC puppet did last week...duhhh
Flat out lie.
@@DavidSibley040461 No its true, Russians are brainwashed sheep filled with Putin's propaganda.
@@DavidSibley040461 If you think that the questions asked are not vetted then you no nothing about Russia
@@luke250829 First, he allows questions from even foreign journalists . Second, he goes on for hours I think over three. You think all those questions are vetted?
So Putin wants Ukraine to give up territories (four complete oblasts) which are not even occupied by russian army today!
Option three: Putin flees in summer 2025, when the oligarchs are fed up with him and take the power.
Let Putin have Alaska back!
In your wet dreams.
@Hoophey Russia sold it to the US. They can offer a suitable price and ask Trump if he wants to sell it back.
@@Hoophey Woah! Check out this kid. He's saying something 'edgy' to get attention from two people on the internet.
Apart from a threat of the use of nuclear weapons, what negotiating position does Putin have? How does he deal with a firm no: leave Ukraine, which includes Crimea?
That he’ll keep going - he’s relying on the west esp to wish the war would go away, and lots of his actions are to try and engender the fear “he could do anything” but obv as time has gone on - the range of horrible things he can do has become finite and no more than what he is doing. There are no tricks left …
I’m sure the reason why he’s been bombing civilian cities in Ukraine is not because there’s any benefit from it whatsoever - but to underscore a belief he does terrible things so he could really do terrible things … making himself be perceived as scarily as he can as that suits him as setting opponents in the best frame of mind from his perspective. The snag is we’ve all grown tired of those games, and the west realises other than size, the Russian army is fairly “meh”. They can’t obviously increase the level of what they’re doing. They’re doing all they can. They’ve similarly for decades tried to engender a belief in other counties that they are very competent and very scary. All those psychology games aren’t being backed up by what they’ve managed however.
The only other thing he can do is hope he can get trump to see that if Ukraine are forced to capitulate, Putin will allow trump to claim he stopped the war, so trump is popular domestically … snag is for Putin ,trump’s ego is large so doesn’t obviously need Putin….
Well, unfortunately the economy and equipment reserve still hold some longer, he has all these NK soldiers.
On the other hand Ukrainian do not want to fight anymore, escape the draft and cannot manage to train enough soldiers. With the lack of Western support Ukrainian line might break, and then game over.
a) None whatsoever.
b) By visibly raising the nuclear readiness level, i.e. starting a nuclear 'chicken game', while counting on the average Westerner to be degenerate enough to not come out and play.
He deals with it by saying "make me", knowing well the lack of appetite for that in the west. After all Ukraine doesn't have the manpower and equipment to win those territories back by force without unaffordable casualty numbers, while NATO doesn't want to get involved much more than the current level either. So Ukraine's only viable strategy for total victory is to keep striking Russia's economy until it can no longer even afford the military to hold onto the occupied territory, but that will take a few more years.
@@tobiasrietveld3819BRICS look it up, 45% of the world gdp 3% more than the g7
46 % of the world’s population in BRICS countries USA 4%
Russia gdp will be up 4% over last year,India up 7%, USA gdp up by 2.8%
kaputin has nowhere to go! Except the Hague.
Edward , I hope so.
Kapitin, gold🤣😂🤣
@@edwardsianski725 Maybe Iran or north Korea. But for Iran it is not clear when the dictatorship will end. And who wants to live in North Korea?
What happened to Gaddafi was real justice not a room in a soft European prison.
@@edwardsianski725 along with ALL American presidents since WW2
Putler lost long ago.
Nothing he can gain at this point will make up for his losses.
Delusional
@@s0ycapitan Putin is beyond delusional. He is weak, feeble, paranoid, and beaten.
@@s0ycapitan..WHAT ?
@@s0ycapitan The way V. Putin appears tell me he does see it.
Lost what ?
Vlad expects his orange asset to provide Appeasement
Ridiculous theory built on the work of "Our man in Salisbury" Chris Steele
Trump is what Stalin would characterize as a "useful stooge". He is a lightweight that is easily manipulated by anyone that strokes his massive ego.
Starmer is the useful stooge of Daddy Schwab and Daddy Soros.
Other stooges Rutte, Kallas, Trudeau, Verhofstadt, Obama etc.
Trump is strong and independent.
@@joewoodchuck3824you are delusional. He’s absolutely a tool.
@@joewoodchuck3824 I suppose you voted for him. You won't see the life getting any better in the long run for his many voters that are hoping that he would make their lives just that. If the medias can secure a GOP re-election at a free election four years from now, they will do so. If they can't, the election will be rigged.
@@joewoodchuck3824let’s see if you think that in 4 years time
Things don't look good for Pudding.
Strange though that Ukraine keeps advancing in the wrong direction.
Do they have compasses over there?
things don't look good for Shultz,Macron,Trudea.Zelensky and Stramer you mean...in case you did't notice the west is falling to bits
@@Marvin-dg8vj Putin's army advances a few miles every month at huge cost, he doesn't even control the 4 oblasts he declared as Russian. Are you not a little bit embarrassed?
Putin has abject fear of scooters.
I feel Moscow needs more "Boris Bikes"
❤Ukraine ❤
The former pm understands too well
How Russia is not ruled by capable leadership is baffling to me.
Russia has 3 months left. Putin has no GDP
Russia is not losing-not now, not in the foreseeable future, and definitely not in the next few months. While Ukraine has mounted significant resistance, and the war has had a heavy toll on Russia, Russia still has the capability to win this conflict, and it hasn't even been forced to go all-in yet. The difference here is that Russia can mobilize far more resources and manpower if it feels truly threatened, which is something that Ukraine simply cannot match.
Russia has held back from full-scale mobilization because they don’t feel sufficiently threatened to warrant it. Why would they sacrifice their civilian economy and push the country into a total war state when they believe they can still achieve their goals without it? In a limited conflict, Russia has the edge. They are not in the same position as Ukraine, which is already operating under severe limitations, having already mobilized nearly everything it can.
Now, let’s talk about mobilization. Russia has demonstrated time and time again that, when necessary, they can scale up their forces dramatically. Russia can mobilize up to 1-2 million men, and they can keep this up for years if needed. And unlike Ukraine, which has reached its limits on mobilization, Russia can continue ramping up its forces year after year, whether it's 500,000 men per year or up to a million. This would drastically increase Russia’s forces, further tipping the scales in their favor.
To put this in perspective, if Russia were to fully mobilize, they could push their forces into the millions-a scale we haven’t seen in modern conflicts. Realistically, we’re talking about mobilizing 5, 6, or even 7 million men. This could happen within the next few years, making the war resemble World War II in scale.
This isn’t just about numbers, though. The resources Russia can tap into are practically unlimited compared to Ukraine. Russia has vast reserves of artillery, ammunition, equipment, and most importantly, manpower. And while a total war would undoubtedly strain Russia’s economy, it would be less humiliating than losing. In fact, the consequences of Russia’s full mobilization would be severe, but the consequences of losing the war and letting Ukraine expel them from Crimea or the Donbas would be far worse-for both Russia’s prestige and for Putin personally.
Ukraine is already operating under a total war economy, but it’s already stretched beyond its limits. It has been mobilizing older men and people who are less fit to fight. The war effort is putting massive strain on its economy. If Ukraine had to keep increasing mobilization, they’d soon be facing even older, less capable soldiers, making their efforts unsustainable. On the other hand, Russia still has the ability to field fresh recruits and draw from a far larger pool of reserves-an advantage Ukraine can’t match.
Now, in a total war economy, GDP doesn’t matter as much as people think. In total war, the focus shifts from sustaining civilian life to producing war material at any cost. We saw this in World War II, where the Soviet Union operated for months with almost zero GDP, yet still managed to recover and out-produce its enemies. The key is how much physical material your economy can make to fuel the war effort. For example, if people are starving to death but the country can produce two more tanks instead of food, that’s what matters in total war. The war economy focuses on raw output rather than civilian well-being. Russia can go into a full mobilization mode and sacrifice its civilian economy for military production, and still sustain the war effort over an extended period.
In summary, Russia is not losing, and it won’t lose anytime soon. If they decide to escalate, the scales will tip massively in their favor. Ukraine’s ability to continue this war is already limited, and once Russia starts fully mobilizing, there’s simply no way Ukraine can compete. The potential consequences for Ukraine are catastrophic, and no peace deal would be kind to them. Russia can wait. And if necessary, they can make the war go on much longer. The only question is whether the West will continue to support Ukraine and for how long. Without that support, the reality of total war in Ukraine becomes inevitable, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.
@@Ubesoft-vc5te👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@@Ubesoft-vc5teThe Russian IS in full scale war mode, they don't even have enough men to fill factory jobs, inflation over 9%and been growing for over 2 years, interest rates up to 23%, Ruble crashing heavily... ohhhh they totally have it under control hahahaha
Don't forget about all the Russian of fighting age leaving to live in Bali and Thailand.
Why you think they need North Korean help... Hmmmm
@@Ubesoft-vc5te 🤣🤣🤣
Give Putin nothing,
Perhaps his mate Our Dear Leader President un-elect Elon Musk will save him?
Unelect?
🎉Our dear Supreme leader😂Musk, 😂and his acolyte Donny - the Orange - Trump. 🥲🤣🤣
Or PRESIDENT AT LARGE....POLYGAMIST ELON MASK
Russia is another word for bluff.
For the truth must read the book Exposing Putins Lies
While Vlad was talking about mars attack, the President of Ukraine was received in the EU.
he is mot the president of Ukraine..his term of office has expired
Ack, Ack!!!
@@briancarno8837Ok, Prime Minister of Ukraine then.
Or, he can just do a fake election like Adolf Putin did. Simple.
Hahahaha
Tic toc vlad tic toc
Vladimir clearly stated that Kyiv must be renamed Putingrad...
Putingrad🤣🤣🤣
Putridvlad perhaps.
@@stephenhill545 No, the Great rulers of Russia = Lenin - Leningrad. Stalin - Stalingrad. Putin - Putingrad...
Oh wow. Really? This is news. FASCINATING. Tell us more, Igor.
@@rickywright1264 200 statues of Vladimir is under production - will be delivered 2025-2026...
0.83 indian rupee = 1 ruble
indian rupee is getting stronger, ruble is getting weaker
Why does the host cut off the guest when the guest is speaking?
I'll wait to see what President Musk says.
I respect this former Russian PM.
But I did not hear him answer the question of what happens to the Kursk Oblast and any other Russian land that Ukraine now occupies?
After Ukraine invade Kursk on Aug 6th, 2024 (BTW, the 79th Anniversary of Hiroshima), Putin gave "orders" to expel the Ukrainians "immediately".
Then, he said "by October 1st".
Now, around early December, he says "I can't give a date!".
Hahahaha sooo true.
He is literally saying " I have totally fukd up here, and now don't know what to do. Help please"
Basically wants his cake and eat it lol.
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦❤
Putin plays checkers while Zelensky plays chess.
Haha Zelenskyy is playing with Star Wars figures 😂
@ - Putin is playing with Barbie Dolls.
A sit down discussion about all the subjects that properly run a nation, with the thousands of intricate details between President Putin/ Sergey Lavrov and Brandon/ Boris Johnson.
Say no more.
tRUMP should offer Putin Alabama Mississippi and Florida so Ukraine can keep the land Russia holds in Ukraine to get the Peace he promised! 😊
Thats really generous - I mean Putin only occupies an area the size of Mississippi...
He should offer the dump that is California
This is NOT Putin. Why do you show his double?
Seriously...🥴
Because the real Putin is looking terrible now just look at his eyes they are nearly closed When interviewed
The audio in this video is absolutely horrid. As if the Russian accent isn't bad enough, the room that this person, being interviewed, is in obviously has hardwood floors which creates a lot of echo. And they seem to jump back & forth a bit, trading English words for Russian ones; or maybe that's just the horridity of the audio.
I think it is your device, the audio is perfevtly clear on my iPad.
@struck2soon: No Russian accent, no echo, no trading Russian words for English words?
Really?!
@ “no Russian accent”. You can’t hear his Russian accent? Really? (Time for a hearing check.)
@struck2soon: Are you trolling or are you really this _`глупый`?!_ 🤔
Morpheus, his Russian accent is so strong even a child could tell he is Russian. What is your excuse? Are you deaf, or just in denial that he is actually who he says he is?
Fascinating!
times radio is visibly nervous
Nyet Botnik. Level one deflection troll. Donbas for you, for the motherland!
@@rickywright1264 don't know what a deflection troll is
Some good ideas from the Russian 😊
Not sure that I like that guy… former prime minister.
a poo-tin mouthpiece.
Putin nervous because, battlefield all frontline Russia backward😂😂
Why not your country uk try it to test president Putin if he means it ? Ranting nonsense everyday.
What a joke
Why are you talking about propaganda 🥵
I pray putin meets Jesus today
Would make no difference. Just like the pharaoh in the book of Exodus, Putin’s heart is hardened. 😢
I bet he would meet anybody but Jesus
Journalism 😂😂
I wonder how many went to sleep in the conference room, of course no ruzzians outside the room would listen to him 4 hours. 😂
Quantity over quality. Puketin surely likes the sound of his own voice. One man. One odd twisted man pulls all the political, social and financial strings, whilst the citizenry tremble.
Give it up Buddy. Your goose is cooked!
tHE tiMEs & it’s sterling track record 😂🤦🏽♂️🫠
FVP
Flowers 🌺
Planet
Uranus
Seen you wrong plant
Seen you not seed
Planet
Flower
Amber
Senator
Mess
Why are you incessantly and ad nauseum posting word-salad?
Know one live on mars
Planet
Flower thorn
Where do you Times Radio get these idiots out of?
So funny
He is the ex-PM of Russia, so he is no “idiot”. (Or did you not know that? You look ignorant.)
Imagine Starmer trying to give this kind of press conference. He wouldn't last 10 minutes. The British politicial class are pygmies in comparison.
BS
This is the dumbest channel ever
I watched his speech and didn’t get the impression he was hiding nerves with empty threats but I’m just and impartial observer and not a propaganda channel like Times Radio.
Your TH-cam account suggests otherwise Igor.
Putin NATIVS non e nervous DIFERENTS Putin MANGE nervous
What are you trying to say?
@@reginarider - might be Latin
Wee wee!
dude, not even the translate button knows what you're blabbering about. just write in your native language, it's easier for everyone
Terrible interview.
How the UK?.... falling off a cliff.... Lol...
What dumpster of a country are you from?
How many Western politicians would be prepared to give such press conferences and take questions openly from Russian or Chinese journalists?
Most leading politicians in EU I guess. But with us power is less focussed in one person, they may be sided by relevant ministers.
Vladolf Putin had every question given in advance. Nothing was open. Leaders in democracies (Europe/Japan/Canada/Australia) are able to answer without choosing questions.
@UserDefaultEurope keep dreaming. You are just a fancy parrot.
@@jensstergard9380 I can't see Von Der Leyen doing it!Orban and Fico perhaps but none of the other US lapdogs.
@@UserDefaultEurope Which is codswallop.Of course on both sides some questions are selected by not all.
Host about the Russian people “they don’t have a choice” unlike the glorious different options available to the free British people!
The British certainly have choices. If you don't like them you are free to start a new party. But you've chosen an election system that doesn't give a precise representation of the voters in parliament. May I suggest you take a look at the Scandinavian countries.
@@jensstergard9380just accept that your system failed to deliver and you are no better than any other corrupt regime in your neighborhood..stop falling for propaganda.
@@jensstergard9380 I was borh there and served in the Royal Marines in the Falklands War and Northern Ireland.Then there were stark choices between Mrs Thatcher and Mr Foot.What I was referring to is that now both major parties are almost indistinguishable in their policies.
@@mlikely72 Whats wrong with voting reform , Libs or Green
That would be very encouraging.What makes me disillusioned is that most people don’t seem to be able to depart from the two party system.
When I see and hear people like this. I know Russia is winning.
“Winning”…have you been living in a cave? He is LOSING over 1000 troops PER DAY! (You need to open your eyes.)
@ we shall see. My eyes have been wide open. It would be best for you to think for yourself and not let your puppet masters control your thinking. I know that sounds difficult but only you can save yourself from mental slavery.
Strange kind of winning, they've been doing it for nearly 3 years
Cool story.
@ not everything happens as planned. Duh!! Still winning though. As you shall see for good in the near future.
War would have been avoided Right from the beginning of war. Give piece of land to Russia .
War created by CIA not Ukraine
Why are you lying?
Already taken Crimea
Halfwit
😂😂😂
😂You are spouting propaganda😂
This conflict is over and the USA lost
One hundred percent.The level of western denial and magical thinking is breathtaking!
What ? Usa snd the rest of the western world have not even put on there boots yet ...FOOL !
Nonsense! Your right to express your opinion freely here is under threat. If D. Trump wants to defend the democratic world, he can do so. If he doesn't the US won't loose just because democracy moves towards an end.
@Mr97: What did they lose? How are they relevant to, necessarily, anything discussed in this video?
And, please...do, go into detail!
@@MorpheusOnethe conflict in Ukraine is a proxy war of the USA one of the goals was to weaken Russia to the point of collapse
Despite the western media misinforming their viewers, the proxy war is a failure
It has strengthened the BRICS trading within the participating nations and continues to weaken trade deals between BRICS countries and G7 countries
BRICS has surpassed G7 in GDP and the gap will continue to grow as more countries join
This failed proxy war is another sign of the crumbling US empire
😂😂😂😂😂😂
What did russian bot accounts do before youtube allowed emoji's?
@Scowatch rutube 😅😅😅😅😅😅ttishAtheist
@@ScottishAtheist - God bless Scotland
Is that all?!?
Putler should ask for Alaska, Hawaii, medireranian part of France, and maybe, just maybe, will be happy.
Nah.
Waiting for good news and russia to be free.from.evil
You mean free from NATO threats.
Planet
Flower