The U.K. must come out of the ECHR, change our U.K. laws to clearly state that if you land on ANY of our beaches, the U.K. will NOT process you, Zero access to ANY support, Zero access to lawyers and our courts and finally ZERO chance on getting leave to remain in the U.K. Zero documents to PROVE to the U.K. where you have come from should also mean ZERO processing of your claim.
The U.K. must come out of the ECHR, change our U.K. laws to clearly state that if you land on ANY of our beaches, the U.K. will NOT process you, Zero access to ANY support, Zero access to lawyers and our courts and finally ZERO chance on getting leave to remain in the U.K. Zero documents to PROVE to the U.K. where you have come from should also mean ZERO processing of your claim.
@@thereforeayamI think the OP is referring to the fact that 95% of the boat people deliberately dispose of any ID whilst crossing the Channel. If they were true and legitimate asylum seekers, they’d be better served by keeping their ID to enable their building a legitimate case for claiming asylum, but they don’t, so they aren’t (really asylum seekers).
@@alanhat5252 Ahh, here we go with the word games again. Whilst these migrants might not be in receipt of what we would officially call "benefits" being given free accommodation, food, clothing, mobile phones, heating, water and healthcare is no different to "being on benefits." It's a distinction without a difference.
@@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g4 95% of boaters are granted asylum, 5% are sent back. That 5% are white people, so getting a dingy and pretending to be from Russia or Poland may be an easy way to escape.
I can’t imagine an invasion looking any different to this ; boatloads of unidentified military age men arriving unannounced on our shores. The only difference is we would meet them with an armed attack and not greet them with large tourist buses, hot chocolate, a new cell phone, and free luxury accommodation. What form of dementia are we suffering from?
You are suffering from misinformation and disinformation, selective data and manipulation of the narrative. There is nothing illegal about entering a country to seek asylum; methods of doing so might be irregular , and profiteering from people's desperation to the extent of charging extortionate amounts is not new, but entering any country to seek asylum, with or without authorisation, is not illegal and is internationally recognised as a human right. Using force (e.g. naval or border forcevessels) to turn asylum seekers back is internationally recognised as a breach of human rights, and is usually associated with fascism,isolationism and extreme nationalism by administrations that insist on these rights for themselves whilst denying these rights to others.
@@quantisedspace7047it might just be because I’m dyslexic but I think the statement made above doesn’t grammatically make sense? Also, the Labour government is the UK government & not just England (which they are suggesting it is). So tend to agree with you for more than one reason.
@@jamesavery2 It's not a majority, two thirds of voters chose parties other than the Tory/Reform uniparty. Or four out of five voters chose parties other than Reform.
@@jimmckean7344And neither are the majority of those coming over. They just want the milk and honey and they get it. If your life was in such despair, you'd have nothing so how are they selling out €10,000 for a slot on a dinghy. I could understand one or two having thousands in their back pocket but come on, 450 people a day all have this sort of money? Wake up.
I wonder how many people here have actually had contact with these illegal immigrants? I worked for a company delivering supply's to the hotels, where they are given mobile phone, money, cloths and food all for free. To give you people in support of the invasion a taste of their attitude, we were delivering new mattresses to the hotel, and they refused them and demanded memory foam ones instead. One phone call, and it was instantly accepted by the higher-ups. Yet if I were to lose my job, I would be out on the streets.
After being in the forces for 12 years, I’m telling you now, the Navy have the equipment to stop if they wish, they can stop the small boats of Somalia, they can stop the small boats in the English Channel
The navy could use water cannons near the French off shores border line to turn back these dinghies. We could also place cabled booms along our shore line with entry points which are manned by customs.and have the RNLA accompany them back to France. We could place mines on the shore to .............. We could get a government that actually wanted to stop this invasion.
You're not seriously suggesting there's a connection between those two events are you....careful now, you might end up in clink for speaking the truth !
One boat carrying thousands would be considered an invasion, that is true. However, I would suggest a large number of small boats, collectively carrying thousands, is also an invasion.
It's been deliberate for decades. Started with Blair, continued by the Tories, & now it comes full circle with Labour to deliver the coup de grace. Deliberate is an understatement.
The various governments have known the facts about the economic costs of immigration for decades. Their failure to reduce the burden and, in fact, increase the rate of immigration points to the inevitable conclusion that this is economic and cultural suicide by design.
Only partially true. You have to dig much further into various govt offices, advisors, special envoys etc. The ppl putting this into motion were already working from inside these various offices several decades prior to his election.
Whether it's legal or not? I'm confused. I always thought that the Royal Navy was part of the Ministry of Defence, whose job it is to 'defend' this country
@@raycundy4265what they were asked to do is illegal & all captains who participated would have had their licenses taken away instantly leaving our Navy with no captains!
I don’t get how a truck driver who is found to have a few migrants who snuck into the trailer gets fined, points and possibly looses their hgv licence, an airline finding a passenger not having a ticket or passport gets a massive fine yet the rnli get praised for taxiing them here from the French coast
If France are willing to escort them half-way, then the UK should be willing to do the same. Once an illegal boat realises it won't get anywhere once it sets sail from France, they'll soon stop. Why are the UK under more of an obligation than France?
I agree 100%, and would add that France should accept them back, given we are paying them to stop the boats. Imaging all those leaving the camps return back to the camps, it would kill the crossing within six months.
Yes, it's deliberate, well said - how can it not be? If it happened once, it could be a mistake - maybe even twice. But ELEVEN times a day!? For YEARS!? Just like all the other anti-British policies that this traitorous government enacts, it's vey VERY deliberate!
Yes, we know. There seem to be some people here who are under the impression that our govt is paying the French to STOP them coming here ! This harks back to a previous comments where some people apparently didn't understand the meaning of "concessions do not apply", thus reversing the meaniing of the sentence.
@ The French are escorting hundreds of migrants each day across the channel. In what way is that stopping them? That is not stopping them. Escorting them is facilitating them
If the UK has an international legal obligation to pick up these migrants when they get into UK waters why has France not the same obligation to pick them up before they get to UK waters?
France is paid by the UK to police, at the ports in the past and even more money now since the flood of rubber boats. France's obligation it seems is to ensure safety and no one dies in their waters and will escort to the mid-channel, where the UK then picks them up. IT IS REDICULOUS. Isn't there something about international law about putting to sea in unworthy boats. STOP THE RNLI being a ferry service. TURN THE BOATS BACK.
Despite the missing capital 'L', it is obvious to the majority of readers that the writer refers to our Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, not fake ones.The two ending emoji's are a clue. I note that you have no YT history. Troll, by chance?
Record numbers are coming from France to the UK, so should we not get our money back from the French? Also, since their performance has been underwhelming, to be polite, I trust we will not give them another penny!
It's ALL PLANNED MACRON, And may, Johnson, Sunak & The toolmakers tool (son) ALL serve the same MASTERS Just like that reptile war crim B-LIAR still does
Should be a condition for that money that's given to them. If they don't do as contracted to with the money then they shall receive x amount of people back from the uk to france.
"Get our money back" ?! What on Earth for ? Our Government is paying the French to deliver a certain number of persons and they /are/ doing that. What is your justification for wanting a refund ?
@@alanhat5252 Article 31 of the 1951 refugee convention explicitly states that refugees should not be penalized for illegal entry if they are coming directly from a place where they are fleeing persecution, as long as they present themselves to authorities without delay, but they are not doing so, and very often are not fleeing persecution, so what would the UK be fined for?
Objective. We are the number one ropes and netting country in the world and there should be a fence in the channel. We put concrete blocks at the entrance of The Solent to prevent U-Boats entering Gosport and Pompey so why not build a barrier. The time has come.
our once mighty navy that travelled all over the world, killing raping and stealing on behalf of the king who shared none of the booty with the plebs. by the way, they didnt present the american or the australian or the indian owners of the land with any paperwork .The only difference now is that you need more migrants
@@alanhat5252 Then what do you suggest instead? Harsher punishments for illegal entrance when combined with invalid refugee status and/or not declaring to the authorities immedietly?
If I were to paddle from Dover to Calais without documents would I be put up in a nice hotel and allowed to claim benefits and stay ? Of course not ... I would be sent straight back !
We will get arrested because their is a higher power in charge of all this, our government isn't in charge anymore, they are just stringed puppets being controlled by the next order, United Nations will govern the world to control all of humanities wrong doings, they want to end all war, poverty and slow the effects of "global warming", in 2030 they will put net zero into place, say goodbye to petrol cars and holidays abroad using planes and ferries
Agreed I told my kids to study hard and leave the uk - other nations are having the same problem but other nations are not as wet and giving as ours . This is why people are leaving France , Italy , Germany and Spain because they dont get anywhere near the same level of handouts ,
To EVERONE who is advising their Children and Grandchildren to leave GB, I have though this many times when I have felt desperate about the illegals arriving on Our Shores, and then realise that is exactly what they want , take Our lives,take our young women,homes,jobs,freedoms, OUR COUNTRY BASICALLY and this useless so called Government is along with the French in my Opinion giving it to them on a 4 star Plate, we are supposed to accept the FACT that they have more rights than the Tax paying UK CITIZENS,IF WE OBJECT we are called racist, we stand up for ourselves we are thrown into prison overnight, and yet they being given legal aid willy nilly when they commit crimes against the LEGAL POPULATION OF GB, how can this be a level playing field for the INDIGENOUS population. We no longer have free speech to say how we feel about them coming here illegally,and then I realise we have been being played for at least 4 decades in our schools OUR Children have been being brainwashed into thinking it's all OK, and I now realise that they have been doing it to Our Grandchildren TOO, in my opinion. When my Grandson was 7or 8 my daughter sent me a video of him in school where they were having Indian dancing lesson, there were no Indian Children in that school at the time and smiled and thought it cute , he's thirteen now and over the years I came to the realisation that he wasn't being taught Irish dancing ,Scottish dancing, Welsh,or English traditional dancing just , Indian , Pakistani. We have been so blind and nieve to not see what was going on right in front of our eye's. What a gullible Nation we have become , they have taken over wearing carpet slippers and Our government have helped them and are still helping them to do it, IN MY OPINION. My parents and Grandparents would be ashamed to see all they Fought for go down the PAN. 💯🙏😵😤😱😨😰💒🌹
No, technically they didnt. There were ppl already working in various parts of the govt for decades long before any of what is going on currently was even the slightest bit noticable to the public. Which applies to the majority if not all "western" govts. Even if a miracle happened & they all left there is still the problem of those working in these offices, departments etc that will continue to aid/abed the mar*ists, co*munists & other is*amist elements that are causing 99% of the problems within western countries today. It isnt just bottom up causing all these same issues, it is interior of the top down also. Im 45 & this has been going on & being put in motion prior to even my conception. Started by the so*iets & picked up by is*amists "allies" along the way
The class action you call for is called voting. HOWEVER! The majority voted Conservative or Labour who are in support of the invasion'. Clearly therefor, the majority of voters are content with the status quo.
I have a quick question. I read an article not so long ago that mentioned immigrants were all going over to Ireland because of the deal we had with Rwanda. The Irish then claimed to have been sending the immigrants back to the UK within hours of arriving. So my question is, why is it that the Irish are allowed to send them back to the UK, but we can't send these boats back to France?
Ireland proposed emergency legislation that would enable them to return migrants back to the UK if they had travelled there via N.I. The UK though has refused to accept any attempt at returning migrants, none have been returned since 2020. There's also the issue of the Dublin Regulation. One of the things we lost when Brexit happened was being a party to the Dublin Regulation. We have no mechanism now to return migrants to France. This is the main reason things have accelerated so much since Brexit.
Wow, I hadn't realised that Lee Anderson was a renowned expert in maritime law, but then he's such an erudite modest man with so much to be modest about.
@@melvinplant8637 Proof that Anderson doesn't know what he's talking about. Read maritime law and find out for yourself instead of just believing things because you'd like them to be true. It's a very unclear and widely disputed (by legal experts in the field) topic and cannot be taken in isolation.
@@Englishman999It's funny how this channel hasb been clearly pushes Farage's narrative (I am not saying he's affiliated with him btw) and almost the entire community basically a fan of Farage who's one of the main drive behind Brexit which caused this. The next surprise for these people will be the American style health insurance system if he ever gets in power.
Would prefer to see those in govt & other various positions that arent in elected positions that put all of what is going on nowdays into motion there first. As they as they're in those positions it doesnt matter who the PM is, things will continue as they have been & even more visably the past 2 decades
This debate was over in 2010 when Cameron won the vote. Currently, all peaceful solutions have been exhausted. What comes next couldn’t come sooner. I will not leave this mess for my children to clean up, I will join the English working class when the S hits the fan
I don't think it's been down to the government for a long time, their is a global repositioning of hierarchy in place due to effects of poverty and global warming etc, the reset they have been on about is because we have messed up the planet so much leeched the planet of most of its resources and over populated past our means, the United nations are likely to take control really soon once our fake government has made things as impossible for us to live in effectively, then they will probably take full control of everything and unite the whole world to work together but for them to take over I think they have to make things that bad for everyone that when they do step in we will then accept it but it takes a certain level of brain washing first, the borders will not close, taxes will rise astronomically and lots of us will end up losing our homes and possibly our lives aswel before it's all happens, this is just my understanding of it, I don't believe this is down to the labour parry, I believe this has been discussed with all the countries political leaders
If they were again allowed to claim asylum in embassies they wouldn't be forced to come here to claim asylum, but then nobody would be raking in cash from all the "hotels".
"New homes" doesn't mean "new houses" though. Perhaps Rayner is planning to accommodate them all in a Hilbert Hotel. It is the only thing that makes sense. How else do you fill up an infinitely-sized hotel with an infinite number of immigrants, and then be able to accommodate an infinite number of dingies arriving, each of which carries an infinite number of people ? Get every extant guest to move to room 2 N and move the immigrants into the odd numbered rooms. Rinse and repeat.
My Cherokee Indian girlfriend when I was a tender age 15 said. Branches are easier to break than the trunk. Take a bite of the enemy every day and the trunk will fall believe me. This is the philosophy of Islam sadly!
Sorry Dan, there were Easter a lot of small boats that went across the channel in 1944 and that was very much an invasion. Some of the boats only carried 36 people so yes this is an invasion from France and should be stopped. Clearly in the case of the Gbh assault, this guy was an economic migrant. We are under no obligation to keep him here or his child.
The argument that migrants might bring weapons with them if turned back is a very weak one. If anything, it would make more of an argument to turn the boats back with force.
I went to new Zealand on a working visa in 2001, had to pass a fluent vocal English test despite being English, to enter 😂. Plus have over £1500 in savings and a trade. Rigorous. Here you just need to get your foot on land.
This is beyond acceptable! I don't think these idiots in government realise how badly this is going to end! for everybody... Starmer needs to be removed ASAP ..
It's beyond "un"acceptable as well. The Govt realise perfectly well how bad this is, because they designed it that way. Yes, Starmer needs to go. We know that. Just posting that imperative here isn't going to make it so. We need a proper plan of action.
Why doesn't France have the same responsibility to stop them in French waters for safety purposes as you have described that we have once they enter British waters?
@@yessanknow302 The vast majority are not in 4-star hotels. In the few cases they are, it's hotels that might once have been 4-stars, but are in need of refurbishment, and so can be block-booked cheap by the government. Also, asylum seekers don't get the use of the additional facilities that merit the stars.
Controlled by the UN so that when they come to rule the whole world they will look like heroes when they make all their changes against poverty, war and global warming
I do feel like that at times, but enter into and out of positivity and negativity. I do have BAD dreams about the current invasion. This is because I feel for the northern towns afflicted by it. But also say Farnborough.
if we must have the obligation to make sure the boat people are safe in a small boat when arriving - then why are the French not under the same obligation by NOT letting then get in the boats in the first place.
I have heard that the French say they can’t stop boats when they are in the water; even though they are clearly overloaded? We must not remain impotent as a nation.
I see them in my town Altrincham everyday walking around all smoking not caring the world then they go back to their warm Hotel with a nice 3 meals a day
And it will, because that's the reason there's is a shit hole, it's not the country, its the people, so when they come here the same will happen, turn the uk into a shit hole.
@@Felinewisperer_lyranAnuhazi Yes, and the wealthy British people are brought up with different attitudes to those in the past ie; they don't have any 'loyalty' or 'affinity' with this country and it's people. They could live anywhere in the world and feel at home.
What happens when the French refuse to take them back, does the Royal Navy attempt to force its way through a blockade. If you think things are bad now, how much worse would they get if we did?
Because the situation is not symmetrical. Britain is paying France to deliver so many rubber boat people, not the other way round. We are approaching a world situation where a country's "wealth" is measured according to how many slaves it has. France would keep them if it could, but we are paying them good money to deliver them here, so that's what they are doing. You can't blame the French, really, for wanting short term monetary gain over having a large(r) sl*ve population.
Billions squandered on illegal migration whilst our elderly contemplate freezing this winter ! 😡😡
The U.K. must come out of the ECHR, change our U.K. laws to clearly state that if you land on ANY of our beaches, the U.K. will NOT process you, Zero access to ANY support, Zero access to lawyers and our courts and finally ZERO chance on getting leave to remain in the U.K. Zero documents to PROVE to the U.K. where you have come from should also mean ZERO processing of your claim.
Doctors and dentists are available on call immediately for ‘irregular’ boat people, and impossible for indigenous Brits.
They're filtering off Tax cash for their mates in the 'Welcome' brigade and the businesses that support them.
They will fill this nation with angry brown men intent on damage rather than admit melanin drenched persons can be evil killing monsters too.
@@drstrangelove4998same can be said with getting a Dr appointment.
None of this is added up to make a sense
Poland is setting the standard, putting citizen safety above all else.
As is Hungary!
Yes, they have sense
They got it right . Just slammed the door SHUT !
With Sholtz in charge that will change
Do nas fryce przewożą nielegalnych 😢 a rudy nic z tym nie robi
The first responsibility of a government, is the safety and security of its citizens and the country’s borders.
Welcome the UK.
The U.K. must come out of the ECHR, change our U.K. laws to clearly state that if you land on ANY of our beaches, the U.K. will NOT process you, Zero access to ANY support, Zero access to lawyers and our courts and finally ZERO chance on getting leave to remain in the U.K. Zero documents to PROVE to the U.K. where you have come from should also mean ZERO processing of your claim.
Exactly
Normal countries
Yes, agreed. Borders not "Barbers".
No papers no entry , get them out !
No papers would be in assumption they had to flee in an instantaneous sense. Many of them look packed & not disturbed.
@@thereforeayamI think the OP is referring to the fact that 95% of the boat people deliberately dispose of any ID whilst crossing the Channel. If they were true and legitimate asylum seekers, they’d be better served by keeping their ID to enable their building a legitimate case for claiming asylum, but they don’t, so they aren’t (really asylum seekers).
AND TRIPLE OUT !
No papers, no where to send them. Should be law that first safe country is where those fleeing war have to stay
When we want to go abroad, we have to present passports, and in some cases, a visa is required. Why? Because we are by and large law-abiding citizens.
Can we the people sue the government for lying and not doing what we voted for them to do? Where is the accountability!!?
Yes. National security is the primary reason for taxes to be raised. Corruption Fraud & Treason.
LABOUR AND CONSERVATIVE DON'T WANT TO STOP THEM ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
The boat people are only 3% of immigration.
Neither WILL reform Do anything to stop this, reform = fake tories,
That is not the issue.
They do not want to upset their donors and the EU/WTO/WEF.
Exactly , all part of the globalist elites plan to destroy nation states.
True!
Starmer is despised by the british public
And yet it's the fault of the united nations
Only despised by those with a brain.
@@tomhughes4922 Starmer is simply a UN-WEF stooge.
@@tomhughes4922how?
@@tomhughes4922 Because it is They assist this crap, for their ZIONIST state of Israel MASTERS, (Zionists btw, ARE NOT ALWAYS JEWISH)
Stop the benefits . They ll soon stop
There will still be organised crime
To late they already here
@@alanhat5252 asking that question in 2024 you been hiding under a rock
@@alanhat5252They mean the money the government is allowing them to claim?
@@alanhat5252 Ahh, here we go with the word games again. Whilst these migrants might not be in receipt of what we would officially call "benefits" being given free accommodation, food, clothing, mobile phones, heating, water and healthcare is no different to "being on benefits."
It's a distinction without a difference.
I dont get why I, a uk citizen have to show my passport at airports but illegal immigrants are accepted immediately without any checks..
Just come in on a dingy from France and you'll get free housing, food, clothing, etc. No questions asked
@@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g4 95% of boaters are granted asylum, 5% are sent back. That 5% are white people, so getting a dingy and pretending to be from Russia or Poland may be an easy way to escape.
I can’t imagine an invasion looking any different to this ; boatloads of unidentified military age men arriving unannounced on our shores. The only difference is we would meet them with an armed attack and not greet them with large tourist buses, hot chocolate, a new cell phone, and free luxury accommodation. What form of dementia are we suffering from?
it's the woke mind virus.
You are suffering from misinformation and disinformation, selective data and manipulation of the narrative. There is nothing illegal about entering a country to seek asylum; methods of doing so might be irregular , and profiteering from people's desperation to the extent of charging extortionate amounts is not new, but entering any country to seek asylum, with or without authorisation, is not illegal and is internationally recognised as a human right.
Using force (e.g. naval or border forcevessels) to turn asylum seekers back is internationally recognised as a breach of human rights, and is usually associated with fascism,isolationism and extreme nationalism by administrations that insist on these rights for themselves whilst denying these rights to others.
NOT WE, STARMER!!!
@@melvinplant8637 No, all the Uniparty leaderships for the past several decades.
woke mind virus. they keep deleting it. i'll keep repeating it. fuck you youtube.
To many none English having to much say in our country England.
Get labour OUT.
To whom are you addressing that command ? Why do you imagine we here are in a position to get Labour out than you yourself are.
@@quantisedspace7047he speaks for the sensible majority I'm afraid 🏴
@@quantisedspace7047it might just be because I’m dyslexic but I think the statement made above doesn’t grammatically make sense? Also, the Labour government is the UK government & not just England (which they are suggesting it is). So tend to agree with you for more than one reason.
@@jamesavery2 It's not a majority, two thirds of voters chose parties other than the Tory/Reform uniparty. Or four out of five voters chose parties other than Reform.
@@shugieshugied2269and most of them regret it
11 boats on one day. Does that not also imply an invasion?
Or as we used to say "Armada".
YES YES YES ,??? WHAT ELSE COULD IT POSSIBLY BE
An invasion is what you did to Australia, India, North America etc.!
Hardly. Have an idea how many boats arrive every day bringing in cocaine? The cost to our economy many billions more than immigrants.
11 boats that they ADMIT to.
No country would allow me in without my passport
as a tourist that's true but if you're claiming refuge you don't need documents.
And without the means to support yourself!!!
You aren't fleeing oppression, torture, rape or execution, are you?
@@jimmckean7344And neither are the majority of those coming over. They just want the milk and honey and they get it. If your life was in such despair, you'd have nothing so how are they selling out €10,000 for a slot on a dinghy. I could understand one or two having thousands in their back pocket but come on, 450 people a day all have this sort of money? Wake up.
@@jimmckean7344 What in France ?
I wonder how many people here have actually had contact with these illegal immigrants? I worked for a company delivering supply's to the hotels, where they are given mobile phone, money, cloths and food all for free. To give you people in support of the invasion a taste of their attitude, we were delivering new mattresses to the hotel, and they refused them and demanded memory foam ones instead. One phone call, and it was instantly accepted by the higher-ups. Yet if I were to lose my job, I would be out on the streets.
If they wanted to stop it they could no problem thing is they don’t 🤬
After being in the forces for 12 years, I’m telling you now, the Navy have the equipment to stop if they wish, they can stop the small boats of Somalia, they can stop the small boats in the English Channel
Why do you think the Royal Navy isn't stopping the illegals?
The navy could use water cannons near the French off shores border line to turn back these dinghies.
We could also place cabled booms along our shore line with entry points which are manned by customs.and have the RNLA accompany them back to France.
We could place mines on the shore to ..............
We could get a government that actually wanted to stop this invasion.
Teresa may signed an agreement with the United nations to facilitate the crossings
The RN stopped some small boats (2008) alongside the Russians and USN. Guess what ?The small boats are still pirating vessels in the same area.
Yup, it's totally intended
I despise everything about this government there needs to be criminal penalties for this behaviour 🤬
It's not our government it's the United nations
Yeah politicians .
They are bringing weapons , their brains .
Did you despise the last 14 years of government, as well? Especially as it was their watch all of this started...........
@@tomhughes4922It’s Davos.
What about our Governments responsibility for protecting UK Citizens !!
The UN is to blame for this
I wish they would protect us from people like Boris .
They are protecting the UK citizens ( OUR NEW REPLACEMENT ONES )
They don’t give a Fuck.
@@garyh1572idiot
Weakening our own Army whilst strengthening the Illegal Immigrant Army. 🤷🏻🤬🤬🤬🤬Vote Reform🇬🇧🏴🇬🇧🏴🇬🇧🏴.
There are more illegals of military age in hotels now than there are in the armed services .
I did and will every time from now on!
You're not seriously suggesting there's a connection between those two events are you....careful now, you might end up in clink for speaking the truth !
TBH the "rulers" would do everything they can to keep the current situation going
One boat carrying thousands would be considered an invasion, that is true. However, I would suggest a large number of small boats, collectively carrying thousands, is also an invasion.
More enemies arriving daily
in plain sight invasion.
All fighting age we're not going to stand a chance soon
It's been deliberate for decades.
Started with Blair, continued by the Tories, & now it comes full circle with Labour to deliver the coup de grace.
Deliberate is an understatement.
Mass Immigration started in 1948.
LABOUR ARE TO BLAME FOR IMMIGRATION.
GET LABOUR OUT.
🎉🇬🇧REFORM 🇬🇧🎉
The various governments have known the facts about the economic costs of immigration for decades. Their failure to reduce the burden and, in fact, increase the rate of immigration points to the inevitable conclusion that this is economic and cultural suicide by design.
Only partially true. You have to dig much further into various govt offices, advisors, special envoys etc. The ppl putting this into motion were already working from inside these various offices several decades prior to his election.
I can't believe that, only now, far too late, people are beginning to wake up to this
Whether it's legal or not? I'm confused. I always thought that the Royal Navy was part of the Ministry of Defence, whose job it is to 'defend' this country
Exactly, so what is the Navy's reason for saying they can't do it?
What is there to defend against?
@@raycundy4265what they were asked to do is illegal & all captains who participated would have had their licenses taken away instantly leaving our Navy with no captains!
I think their job is to protect the United Nations agenda ultimately ??
@@alanhat5252 Do you know the meaning of the word illegal?
I don’t get how a truck driver who is found to have a few migrants who snuck into the trailer gets fined, points and possibly looses their hgv licence, an airline finding a passenger not having a ticket or passport gets a massive fine yet the rnli get praised for taxiing them here from the French coast
Is the RNLI working for the crims, Mafia, collusion ?
If France are willing to escort them half-way, then the UK should be willing to do the same. Once an illegal boat realises it won't get anywhere once it sets sail from France, they'll soon stop. Why are the UK under more of an obligation than France?
I agree 100%, and would add that France should accept them back, given we are paying them to stop the boats.
Imaging all those leaving the camps return back to the camps, it would kill the crossing within six months.
If the gov didnt want them here they would stop this
Yes
And the government's bosses
Exactly. Just like all the other anti-British policies that this traitorous government enacts, it's vey VERY deliberate!
Yes, it's deliberate, well said - how can it not be? If it happened once, it could be a mistake - maybe even twice. But ELEVEN times a day!? For YEARS!? Just like all the other anti-British policies that this traitorous government enacts, it's vey VERY deliberate!
They are all legally pimped
The £500mil a year is NOT to help stop the boats. It IS to help fund getting the migrants here. We are being fed 🐂💩
Exactly, the same boats are going back to France to be reused and round and round it goes.
Yes, we know. There seem to be some people here who are under the impression that our govt is paying the French to STOP them coming here !
This harks back to a previous comments where some people apparently didn't understand the meaning of "concessions do not apply", thus reversing the meaniing of the sentence.
France stops tens of thousands of crossings each year.
@ The French are escorting hundreds of migrants each day across the channel. In what way is that stopping them? That is not stopping them. Escorting them is facilitating them
@@Nickcooper625 oh really, once stopped Johnny invader just goes home does he?
If the UK has an international legal obligation to pick up these migrants when they get into UK waters why has France not the same obligation to pick them up before they get to UK waters?
because france wants rid of them and our government wants to water down patriotism so we are not united
France is paid by the UK to police, at the ports in the past and even more money now since the flood of rubber boats. France's obligation it seems is to ensure safety and no one dies in their waters and will escort to the mid-channel, where the UK then picks them up. IT IS REDICULOUS. Isn't there something about international law about putting to sea in unworthy boats. STOP THE RNLI being a ferry service. TURN THE BOATS BACK.
very interesting question.....and what about those 500 mio.pounds or more already paid...will there be a "refund"....!!??
They don't want to be captured in French waters as their benefit system is nowhere near as cussy as ours
I guess because when in French water they're not illegal.?
Please dear lord help the people of the UK and their country. 🙏✝️
Which Lord, you have a 'house' full of them ? So how many and which one or ones ?
No one i helping us. Not even allies we have helped in past.
Despite the missing capital 'L', it is obvious to the majority of readers that the writer refers to our Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, not fake ones.The two ending emoji's are a clue. I note that you have no YT history. Troll, by chance?
I think you'll find that it is actually the Devil helping the invaders .
There's more landed here than we picked up from Dunkirk after the retreat 😮
When you flee from war, you take your family.
When you go to war, you go alone.
Wow! That is true and very relevant to this situation.
Best comment on here and so true.
The RNLI is losing loads of funding also because people rightly assume the money is going straight to help them cross.
🎯🎯🎯
Spot on 🇬🇧🫡
Stop the boats save our children
Record numbers are coming from France to the UK, so should we not get our money back from the French? Also, since their performance has been underwhelming, to be polite, I trust we will not give them another penny!
It's ALL PLANNED MACRON, And may, Johnson, Sunak & The toolmakers tool (son) ALL serve the same MASTERS Just like that reptile war crim B-LIAR still does
Should be a condition for that money that's given to them. If they don't do as contracted to with the money then they shall receive x amount of people back from the uk to france.
Nice thought but we all know those idiots Labour love giving our money away.
Haha
"Get our money back" ?! What on Earth for ? Our Government is paying the French to deliver a certain number of persons and they /are/ doing that. What is your justification for wanting a refund ?
You're not being invaded. You're being colonized.
Yep, sure are. Islamic Republic of Britain ! Goodbye Charlie 3, but I guess you will move to Suisse with all the lolly !
All part of the Blaire and Davos plan.
I remember being called a racist for saying years ago this was an invasion
Amazing how all this started when the queen passed little fishy if you ask me
Then we are all racist
Do you think they’ll apologise to you when their daughter is murdered or raped…
@Felinewisperer_lyranAnuhazi It all started in 1948.
You're not a racist. You're a realist.
Sunak brought in a law that anyone coming illegally would not be allowed to stay. It's never been implemented!
It was opposed by the labor party and House of Lords.
@@GetStuffed1. Objection. My lord .
that law itself is illegal, UK would have to pay £trillions in fines while being sanctioned if it was implemented!
@@alanhat5252But Australia did it for ages.
@@alanhat5252 Article 31 of the 1951 refugee convention explicitly states that refugees should not be penalized for illegal entry if they are coming directly from a place where they are fleeing persecution, as long as they present themselves to authorities without delay, but they are not doing so, and very often are not fleeing persecution, so what would the UK be fined for?
Of course it’s deliberate or they’d stop it instantly.
God bless Poland. God bless Hungary. God bless any country that stop this cancer 🙏
The french have got no intentions of stopping the boats. If they can't or won't stop the boats the UK should stop sending the money.
Surely that’s the most basic requirement of our once mighty Navy?!
Objective. We are the number one ropes and netting country in the world and there should be a fence in the channel. We put concrete blocks at the entrance of The Solent to prevent U-Boats entering Gosport and Pompey so why not build a barrier. The time has come.
our once mighty navy that travelled all over the world, killing raping and stealing on behalf of the king who shared none of the booty with the plebs. by the way, they didnt present the american or the australian or the indian owners of the land with any paperwork .The only difference now is that you need more migrants
@@The670533it's the busiest sea lane in the world, it wouldn't be safe or legal
@@alanhat5252 Then what do you suggest instead? Harsher punishments for illegal entrance when combined with invalid refugee status and/or not declaring to the authorities immedietly?
@@alanhat5252 And which traffic sector is making it the busiest sea lane ?
If I were to paddle from Dover to Calais without documents would I be put up in a nice hotel and allowed to claim benefits and stay ? Of course not ... I would be sent straight back !
if you were claiming asylum you would
EXACTLY.
@@alanhat5252 Who'd claim asylum in France of all places ?
@@quantisedspace7047British farmers.
France has an obligation to hear your asylum claim.
Why not just withdraw from any organisation that says we can’t do as we please with these people?
Corruption.
We will get arrested because their is a higher power in charge of all this, our government isn't in charge anymore, they are just stringed puppets being controlled by the next order, United Nations will govern the world to control all of humanities wrong doings, they want to end all war, poverty and slow the effects of "global warming", in 2030 they will put net zero into place, say goodbye to petrol cars and holidays abroad using planes and ferries
Because the government doesn't want to.
That would mean we also lose the protection of international law, we would be invaded within months.
WELL THIS GOVERMENT SHOULD RESIGN,
Government agency's getting very rich from the invasion.
What about the safety of the British people
I have told my children to leave and not buy property here, it's going to be Syria with colder weather soon.
Agreed I told my kids to study hard and leave the uk - other nations are having the same problem but other nations are not as wet and giving as ours . This is why people are leaving France , Italy , Germany and Spain because they dont get anywhere near the same level of handouts ,
I have said the same to my grandson
They will follow wherever your children go .
To EVERONE who is advising their Children and Grandchildren to leave GB, I have though this many times when I have felt desperate about the illegals arriving on Our Shores, and then realise that is exactly what they want , take Our lives,take our young women,homes,jobs,freedoms, OUR COUNTRY BASICALLY and this useless so called Government is along with the French in my Opinion giving it to them on a 4 star Plate, we are supposed to accept the FACT that they have more rights than the Tax paying UK CITIZENS,IF WE OBJECT we are called racist, we stand up for ourselves we are thrown into prison overnight, and yet they being given legal aid willy nilly when they commit crimes against the LEGAL POPULATION OF GB, how can this be a level playing field for the INDIGENOUS population. We no longer have free speech to say how we feel about them coming here illegally,and then I realise we have been being played for at least 4 decades in our schools OUR Children have been being brainwashed into thinking it's all OK, and I now realise that they have been doing it to Our Grandchildren TOO, in my opinion. When my Grandson was 7or 8 my daughter sent me a video of him in school where they were having Indian dancing lesson, there were no Indian Children in that school at the time and smiled and thought it cute , he's thirteen now and over the years I came to the realisation that he wasn't being taught Irish dancing ,Scottish dancing, Welsh,or English traditional dancing just , Indian , Pakistani. We have been so blind and nieve to not see what was going on right in front of our eye's. What a gullible Nation we have become , they have taken over wearing carpet slippers and Our government have helped them and are still helping them to do it, IN MY OPINION. My parents and Grandparents would be ashamed to see all they Fought for go down the PAN. 💯🙏😵😤😱😨😰💒🌹
The mass invasion without ever going to war.
YET!
@@JoannaLamont333 There literally waiting on orders for them to kick off
The shocking thing is we are actually welcoming them with open arms.
Just like samaritans in the bible. Not a new strategy
It used to be called colonisation.
RIP UK, you submitted without a fight.
Sadly, so true!
No, technically they didnt. There were ppl already working in various parts of the govt for decades long before any of what is going on currently was even the slightest bit noticable to the public. Which applies to the majority if not all "western" govts. Even if a miracle happened & they all left there is still the problem of those working in these offices, departments etc that will continue to aid/abed the mar*ists, co*munists & other is*amist elements that are causing 99% of the problems within western countries today. It isnt just bottom up causing all these same issues, it is interior of the top down also. Im 45 & this has been going on & being put in motion prior to even my conception. Started by the so*iets & picked up by is*amists "allies" along the way
What's the reason behind it though.
@@kristiskinner8542
Could say more than three boats be classed as an armada and therefore classed as a threat or invasion?
We wouldn't of Given the
German army Hotel accommodation 84 years ago.
Spot on
Their care isnt our responsibility
We should stop interfering in other countries.
@bbuzz1687 irrelevant
@bbuzz1687 you're part of the problem
@@bbuzz1687 Like if we left Libya and Afghanistan alone for example, we wouldn't have this problem to begin with
@@nekotranslates good majority are coming from Albania, Pakistan, india, Iran, Somalia etc etc countries we haven't been too
Can we take a class action against the government for not keeping us safe?
Good point
Of course, yes. Time to stop asking for permission, because that soft, weak attitude is the problem!
The class action you call for is called voting.
HOWEVER!
The majority voted Conservative or Labour who are in support of the invasion'.
Clearly therefor, the majority of voters are content with the status quo.
Who pays tho if the government were to lose such a lawsuit? we'd essentially be suing ourselves.
I have a quick question. I read an article not so long ago that mentioned immigrants were all going over to Ireland because of the deal we had with Rwanda. The Irish then claimed to have been sending the immigrants back to the UK within hours of arriving. So my question is, why is it that the Irish are allowed to send them back to the UK, but we can't send these boats back to France?
Ireland proposed emergency legislation that would enable them to return migrants back to the UK if they had travelled there via N.I.
The UK though has refused to accept any attempt at returning migrants, none have been returned since 2020.
There's also the issue of the Dublin Regulation. One of the things we lost when Brexit happened was being a party to the Dublin Regulation. We have no mechanism now to return migrants to France. This is the main reason things have accelerated so much since Brexit.
According to Lee Anderson,they could be sent back,. Under maritime law.
Wow, I hadn't realised that Lee Anderson was a renowned expert in maritime law, but then he's such an erudite modest man with so much to be modest about.
@@melvinplant8637 Proof that Anderson doesn't know what he's talking about. Read maritime law and find out for yourself instead of just believing things because you'd like them to be true.
It's a very unclear and widely disputed (by legal experts in the field) topic and cannot be taken in isolation.
@@Englishman999It's funny how this channel hasb been clearly pushes Farage's narrative (I am not saying he's affiliated with him btw) and almost the entire community basically a fan of Farage who's one of the main drive behind Brexit which caused this. The next surprise for these people will be the American style health insurance system if he ever gets in power.
It’s not about race or religion. It’s about whether a nation is in control of its borders.
Obviously deliberate. They will start organizing them next. Watch.
Exactly. 2025 may be it.
I would like politicians that allow these migrants into britain illegally to be put in JAIL😤
NO! Then that have citizenship and leave to stay when they are released. We need to stop making Britain the 'land of milk and honey' for these people.
@@donnamcdonald-g8n The original poster was meaning the POLITICIANS should be jailed, and I agree!
Would prefer to see those in govt & other various positions that arent in elected positions that put all of what is going on nowdays into motion there first. As they as they're in those positions it doesnt matter who the PM is, things will continue as they have been & even more visably the past 2 decades
This debate was over in 2010 when Cameron won the vote. Currently, all peaceful solutions have been exhausted.
What comes next couldn’t come sooner. I will not leave this mess for my children to clean up, I will join the English working class when the S hits the fan
I don't think it's been down to the government for a long time, their is a global repositioning of hierarchy in place due to effects of poverty and global warming etc, the reset they have been on about is because we have messed up the planet so much leeched the planet of most of its resources and over populated past our means, the United nations are likely to take control really soon once our fake government has made things as impossible for us to live in effectively, then they will probably take full control of everything and unite the whole world to work together but for them to take over I think they have to make things that bad for everyone that when they do step in we will then accept it but it takes a certain level of brain washing first, the borders will not close, taxes will rise astronomically and lots of us will end up losing our homes and possibly our lives aswel before it's all happens, this is just my understanding of it, I don't believe this is down to the labour parry, I believe this has been discussed with all the countries political leaders
If they were again allowed to claim asylum in embassies they wouldn't be forced to come here to claim asylum, but then nobody would be raking in cash from all the "hotels".
Every 500 that arrive = 500 new homes once they bring all their families once approved.
government fiat financed grift scheme.
No, it means that 500 homes will be taken from the indigenous population.
@@Malpriorvidsthat would be illegal
"New homes" doesn't mean "new houses" though. Perhaps Rayner is planning to accommodate them all in a Hilbert Hotel. It is the only thing that makes sense.
How else do you fill up an infinitely-sized hotel with an infinite number of immigrants, and then be able to accommodate an infinite number of dingies arriving, each of which carries an infinite number of people ?
Get every extant guest to move to room 2 N and move the immigrants into the odd numbered rooms. Rinse and repeat.
@@Malpriorvids tHEY TOOK GRANNIES MOBILITY SCOOTER I MEAN THE HOUSING ASSOCIATION CONFESCATED IT .
Give me 1mill a year for staff n boats... not a single boat would cross.
Sack the commander...
The Navy does as its told not as it wants...
We are being stitched up every which way.
Yep and we can't do a thing about it
@@Felinewisperer_lyranAnuhazi a national strike maybe
@@Felinewisperer_lyranAnuhaziWrong!
My Cherokee Indian girlfriend when I was a tender age 15 said. Branches are easier to break than the trunk. Take a bite of the enemy every day and the trunk will fall believe me. This is the philosophy of Islam sadly!
Absolutely spot on mate 👍, still to many people far to ignorant to see what's going on.
There Tactics haven't changed for centuries
These small boats are unsafe because of illegal behaviour not because of an accident at sea
The rules have been weaponised against us, & not just the rules of the sea.
Sorry Dan, there were Easter a lot of small boats that went across the channel in 1944 and that was very much an invasion. Some of the boats only carried 36 people so yes this is an invasion from France and should be stopped. Clearly in the case of the Gbh assault, this guy was an economic migrant. We are under no obligation to keep him here or his child.
Thank you for an honest breakdown of events..Clarity is rare these days. 👏
i watched a video yesterday about how Poland is defending it's borders. Why can't we do that?
because Herr Kalergi wouldn't like it.
@@georgeallen8781 because we have weak WEF puppet leaders. It’s as simple as that
Given that we are an Island Nation, it should be easier to Police our borders.
The argument that migrants might bring weapons with them if turned back is a very weak one.
If anything, it would make more of an argument to turn the boats back with force.
How many times have we paid France now?
Too.
France stops tens of thousands of crossings every year. If they didn't, the total of arrivals would be significantly higher.
@@Nickcooper625if the EU Closed its borders it would stop.
Its a complete joke this ,i so fed up with it ,as a ex British soldier,shame on them this government and the pass
I went to new Zealand on a working visa in 2001, had to pass a fluent vocal English test despite being English, to enter 😂. Plus have over £1500 in savings and a trade. Rigorous. Here you just need to get your foot on land.
its a invasion
Wonderful BBB we won’t forget your contribution to getting our country back on its feet , we will get our country back again in the future
We wish, we are being invaded by islamists who outbreed us 5x
only if you stop voting for A-holes
This is beyond acceptable! I don't think these idiots in government realise how badly this is going to end! for everybody... Starmer needs to be removed ASAP ..
It's beyond "un"acceptable as well. The Govt realise perfectly well how bad this is, because they designed it that way.
Yes, Starmer needs to go. We know that. Just posting that imperative here isn't going to make it so. We need a proper plan of action.
@@quantisedspace7047 Yes we do. Vote reform uk in may elections and start to take our country back.
@anthonypace5676 it will be two late buy then
What. About. Duty. Of care to our children .and UK citizens
what about it? it's the government forcing austerity on us, nobody else
This lax approach is going to bite native British people on the butt big time.
It is not lax. It is a deliberate act.
And it is already biting
@@footonearthchris8028 Deliberately lax.
Why doesn't France have the same responsibility to stop them in French waters for safety purposes as you have described that we have once they enter British waters?
Stop giving them free stuff and it will stop 99% of the boats overnight. Why is that so hard?
because it's illegal under international law. They aren't given anything beyond minimal bed & board.
@@alanhat5252it might be a idea, to give British homeless the same benefits, it's two standers 🤦🏻♂️
@@alanhat5252 4 star hotels aren't 'minimal'....a sleeping bag and a few biscuits is minimal.
@@alanhat5252 Right, so that's why they're being put up in 5* Hotels, rather than just being dumped in tents in the Outer hebrides.
@@yessanknow302 The vast majority are not in 4-star hotels. In the few cases they are, it's hotels that might once have been 4-stars, but are in need of refurbishment, and so can be block-booked cheap by the government. Also, asylum seekers don't get the use of the additional facilities that merit the stars.
So, MS Copper answer this, French police rescued illegals near Dunkirk but some were allowed to continue on their way to the UK, WHY?
.. because that's what our govt paid the French to do.
Fine france a million pounds for each migrant that sets foot in the UK.
Yep and as 451 came on Christmas day alone, we'll soon get our money back!
...or with every migrant that arrives we cancel a EU fishing quota.
VOTE REFORM UK. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I did and will continue to, only DECENT PARTY that will do what it say's on the tin, so to speak!!
Why can’t we just stop offering these immigrants all the benefits it might not be such an appealing place to come to
At this point - whats the point in caring?
The country is a pit of greed and corruption.
And it's only getting worse.
Controlled by the UN so that when they come to rule the whole world they will look like heroes when they make all their changes against poverty, war and global warming
Always care, please, its our Country, not theirs.
I do feel like that at times, but enter into and out of positivity and negativity. I do have BAD dreams about the current invasion. This is because I feel for the northern towns afflicted by it. But also say Farnborough.
As a Brit, I am very upset about what was our country!
"tears of the white person" - the favourite drink of some of our MPs.
if we must have the obligation to make sure the boat people are safe in a small boat when arriving - then why are the French not under the same obligation by NOT letting then get in the boats in the first place.
If this is left unchecked. There will be no more places In British prisons. Absolute Madness
Unacceptable that millions of unknown men enter UK illegally then MPs give away £ millions of taxpayer hard earned pounds to pay their hotel bills!
take away the french fishing licences.
Look up what happened in the Cod Wars which we lost to Iceland.
Not the same.
@@markrainford1219 You have to be able to enforce it, what do you think will happen if we try that with France
@@Stormborn-f7l These are mostly french though, they aren't exactly known for anything other than surrender.
I have heard that the French say they can’t stop boats when they are in the water; even though they are clearly overloaded? We must not remain impotent as a nation.
STOP THE BOATS!!!
And planes !!
only way that will happen is to replace the quislings enabling the invasion
Stop the private jets!
How exactly.
Well thank you for that shouting. Do you seriously think that posting that here, to people who are all of the same mind, is going to change anything ?
I see them in my town Altrincham everyday walking around all smoking not caring the world then they go back to their warm Hotel with a nice 3 meals a day
The French Government are taking the piss.
I've just watched America's Tom Homan giving a speech on boarder's we need a Tom Homan
Are you having a problem with boarders or borders? They’re two different things.
Pensioners Paying French slush funds with their winter fuel allowances
They could pay me a million a year to stand on a beach shouting "Go back" thus saving money whilst getting the same results.
Why does the obligation to keep these fighting age men safe - not extend to citizens in the country such as our little girls?
More in one day, maybe a magnitude more than the Germans landed in the UK between 1939-1945.
If they are coming here because here is better than there, what happens when here becomes as bad as there ?
Give it 10 years and you will find out most likely
Why you think the rich have already left
I shall give it less than 10😢@@Stormborn-f7l
And it will, because that's the reason there's is a shit hole, it's not the country, its the people, so when they come here the same will happen, turn the uk into a shit hole.
@@Felinewisperer_lyranAnuhazi Yes, and the wealthy British people are brought up with different attitudes to those in the past ie; they don't have any 'loyalty' or 'affinity' with this country and it's people. They could live anywhere in the world and feel at home.
When are you going to stand as an MP? We need people like you!
Fine the country where the boatsa are coming from for each one that leaves their shores
Divide and rule.
Well if its OK for France to escort them across the 12 mile line escorted by French border security/navy then why can't Britain do the same.
What happens when the French refuse to take them back, does the Royal Navy attempt to force its way through a blockade. If you think things are bad now, how much worse would they get if we did?
Because the situation is not symmetrical. Britain is paying France to deliver so many rubber boat people, not the other way round. We are approaching a world situation where a country's "wealth" is measured according to how many slaves it has. France would keep them if it could, but we are paying them good money to deliver them here, so that's what they are doing. You can't blame the French, really, for wanting short term monetary gain over having a large(r) sl*ve population.
Trafalgar!
@@Stormborn-f7lhow about we refuse to take them, instead of giving France all this power