That’s what make Harrison great. His contemporaries like Keith Richards never really evolved as a guitarist other that his discovery of the Open G tuning which eventually made all of his songs sound the same. When the Beatles came on the scene, Harrison could play rock and roll, rockabilly, and Chet Atkins’s style. Harrison eventually evolved into a very unique slide guitar player that when you heard it you knew it was Harrison.
@@ronroskowske6047seriously. 100%!!!! George's slide guitar is his signature sound!! It's awesome and iconic!!! NOTHING is bubblegum about it! Nothing!
George's slide playing was beautiful, lyrical, distinctive. In NO way 'bubblegum'. And, other bigtime guitarists adore that aspect of his playing (just read the guitar mags.)
I'm glad this album exists and George got it out of his system. I'm also fine with it being named the best solo Beatles album, the triumphant story that comes with it does add to the legacy. George must have thought being a solo star was going to be easy after such a great start. But, I do think it leads to more evidence that all 4 Beatles really needed eachother to be at their best. This album is basically all the scraps from a guy who was being pushed to his creative peak. But as the 70's progress he does seem to tire of pumping out songs/albums and touring, I don't think being an ex-Beatle was quite as rosy as he thought it would be. He said he wouldn't ever be in a band with Paul again so I don't think he craved The Beatles especially, but I think he is more suited to being in a band (or doing occasional projects inbetween gardening), as the mundane superficiality of the music business must be very tedious for him.
At the end of the day George’s music touches me the most. But my all time favorite solo album is Ram. I never get tired of it, enjoy the heck out of it. Next is Plastic Ono Band, then ATMP. But I love them all !
Ram is quite genius. I consider it Abbey Road or two. Imagine if they made another Beatles album with the best of ATMP and RAM. Bit familiar with Lennon's music as I think he needed Paul to complete a composition
My exact sentiments. No.1 Ram, No.2 Plastic Ono Band, No.3 All Things Must Pass. ATMP is great, but it contains too much bloat, filler and is too samey to sustain itself satisfactorily. The White Album captivates as a double album because of its huge variety as well as quality, and its lack of slide guitar cropping up all over the place. The third disc on ATMP is self aggrandisement from Harrison.
I bought the album straight away. 💜George's songs were beautifully designed and written.....It was a pleasure listening to all the songs and knowing they were all George's. 💜
In 1970, both McCartney (in writing) and Lennon (in song) announced that the Beatles were over, and proceeded to fashon lo-fi, DIY debuts that seemed primarily designed to placate their bruised egos. Lennon was decidedly non-commercial, and McCartney eschewed a sure hit by not releasing "Maybe I'm Amazed" as a single. Ringo made albums simply to keep busy. George made no such pronouncements, and optimistically declared, "All Things Must Pass". His debut was everything those albums weren't: lush, sprawling, hopeful, and made with the audience in mind. If the production and scope are seen as faults in hindsight, it was exactly what heartbroken Beatle fans needed at the time. John screamed and Paul wimpered. George performed, and helped the audience adjust to the "new normal" that was the fabs' dissolution. That is what makes the set so enduring.
All Things Must Pass is a near perfect album. Side One and Side Three are amazing with a range of styles and emotions. The Apple Jams are super fun and Out of the Blue is a sublime song.
I got the CD in 1990. I read so many glowing reviews of this album growing up that I had to listen for myself. It did not disappoint. Like you, Matt, I got the 2001 remaster and the 2020 remix. Personally, I love the 2020 remix and that the vocals are much clearer and the production stripped down a bit albeit nowhere close to being “naked”. It’s easy to root for George which I think is why most critics heaped a lot of the praise upon it. I like almost all of the tracks and my favorite is “Run Of The Mill”. I always thought “I Live For You” would have been a nice addition. Perhaps it might have been better for Ringo. Last but not least, I have heard George’s slide guitar being emulated. On Linda Ronstadt’s “You’re No Good “, Andrew Gold plays lead guitar on it and the slide is very Harrison-esque. Also, “You’re So Vain” by Carly Simon has a very Harrison-like solo played by Jimmy Ryan. There’s also a Beach Boys song called “Marcella” where there is a slide guitar solo played in a similar style to Harrison. I think Phil Spector was a PIANO (Producer In A Name Only) on this album. The only thing that guy was producing was evidence. 😉 Ok, I’ll stop for now. Excellent review as always, Matt!
Hey Jeff! I will somewhat concede to the solos in You're So Vain / No Good but I would add that those are blues-based which gives them the edge George's work on All Things Must Pass lacks. George's solo on Day After Day is excellent but the tone is wonderful unlike the less serious approach he takes on his first album.
Not sure why this is even the "acid test". I love it and I would never want to reproduce it -- I do feel it's George's thing, or at least that he does it best and so I could ever do a pale imitation.
Matt, I always appreciate your analysis because you take the emotional response out of it and are t a fanboy. Yet you can still show appreciation and respect for George and this album. I think it’s interesting how of all the four Beatles it was George who sounded the most Beatle-y during their solo careers. This is a classic album, but I think a case could be made that “Cloud Nine” or “33 1/3” are better.
@@Sweetish_Jeff_ I really do love much of the music on this album but some viewers call me "biased against George," a "George basher" and "too harsh." Though I get those responses they are getting fewer as I weed out the fanboys and reel in the more academic and non emotional fan. Of which you are one!
This underscores what I have long thought: one of the biggest tragedies of the breakup of the Beatles was the breakup with George Martin. Aside from Let It Be/Get Back (which of course wasn't fully produced by George) all of the Beatles tracks are well produced and don't sound dated (except one could argue the early music which isn't the production's fault). Yet you have so many solo works that people say "Well that could have been produced better" to the point where it makes the music less enjoyable.
All things must pass is something special and very unique, so much so I will list here the various releases I have in my music collection. 1: 1988 cd fat box Uk release. 2: Japanese HMCD cd box. 3: 2001 remaster fat box and digipak. 4: 2014 cd reissue. 5: 2021 target limited edition with sticker pack. 6: 50th anniversary 5 CD super deluxe boxset. 7: 50th anniversary splatter vinyl. 8: super deluxe 8 LP vinyl deluxe boxset. 9: Uber crate box. 10: 1970 UK first pressing vinyl. 11: 1970 Canadian first pressing. 12: 1970 EMI Australia triple gatefold sleeve. 13: 2010 40th anniversary reissue x 2. 14: 2017 vinyl boxset reissue. 15: 2001 vinyl remaster. Plus various bootleg and session outtake CDs. A bit obsessive perhaps😊
In the run-up to release, the album was heralded (here in the UK) as a forthcoming double album. The 3rd LP, the Apple jam disc, was recorded when the musicians were 'mucking about' during the recording sessions. When the double album was eventually released, the Apple Jam disk was included as a bonus disk for fans (in the same way as reissues sometimes have bonus tracks on them), which is why it bears a different label (not the orange apples).
I disagree with the initial comments as I believe it’s very hard to overate this record. There’s so many really great songs in this one. Even the tracks that were growers meaning they don’t have an initial attraction or hook, really sink in over the years. It’s elegant tasteful melodic well sung and well played.
I really do like that you don't hold back on what you think. I never feel you pander to your audience and this is why I keep coming back. Thanks for keeping it honest. Here is why I think it's a great album. 1) The sound is so big and unique. I don't think there is another album that sounds like this one. I really can't think of one. It's that unique. The full Spector treatment on Wah Wah, What is Life, Awaiting you All, Art of Dying and Let it Down are just enormous. A pity for Let it down, because it's a much better song when dialed down, but all of the others benefit from this explosion of Harrison/Spector/Delanney and Bonnie noise. The you have the impact of the big sound on the slower numbers which adds a grandeur that they wouldn't have had if done in another style. Wagnerian was an apt description by one reviewer. 2) It has three obvious hit singles in My Sweet Lord, What is Life and Apple Scruffs. All three are poppy and none of them are insipid. 3) The songs with more of an acoustic feel are just wonderful- Apple Scruffs, I'd Have You Anytime, If Not for You, Behind that Locked Door, If Not for You, Sir Frankie Crisp, etc. Just great. 4) Harrison isn't stuck in one style; you've got songs with a Dylan feel, pop songs, Delaney and Bonnie Songs, Spector girl group songs, Harrisons more hymn like songs- the variety on this album keeps it fresh for a two album listen. Hard to do with a single voice. 5) The lyrics, the lyrics , the lyrics. Harrison walks the lines between personal to universal without being preachy, upset without self pity. (He won't do this agin until the George Harrison album in 1979.) The lyrics are wise and thoughtful and humane. I don't feel dirty like after an Eagles song or full of indifference like a stones song or self pity like a who song or better than like after a Dylan song. 6) The singing. Harrison was the weakest of the three vocalist with the Beatles- easily the weakest, but on this album he's in better voice than on any other album. Even ignoring all of that, I just love his voice on this album. His voice sounds warm and inviting and his falsettos are wonderful . And his backing vocals are just a tour de force. He painstakingly overdubbed most ,if not all, of them and the sound is really good. 7) The slide guitar. It became the sound of many pop songs in the 70's for a reason, his slide playing is just great. You hadn't really heard this type of sound in a pop songs before this, but you heard tons of it after. 8) It's influence. Harrison put out the first of three big albums that were influenced by Delaney and Bonnie (ATMP, Layla and Exile) . The White Gospel feel was popularized by Harrison (after learning it from D and B) and soon copied by many. Combining it with a Spector sound and lyrics that had actual meaning to them was unique and a good listen. 9) I could add some more, but I'll stop there. CRITICISMS: The Apple Jam is not needed. But the Apple Jam was always presented as an extra- like the poster. So I have never considered it the album proper. I Dig Love is awful. The version of Let it Down doesn't really work, although a great acoustic version is included in the Anniversary set. He probably could have been fine with one Isn't it a Pity. He should have dumped version 2 for I live for You. Ah Pete Drakes steel guitar was another great feature of this album. Anyhow, so 3 bum songs out of 18, the rest were all keepers.
Hey Christian. You make a very good point about the uniqueness of this album's sound and the lyrics are strong, perhaps stronger than even Lennon early solo work. There are many great things about this album and many great songs. I am less charitable on the number of great songs than perhaps you are, but some of it comes down to personal taste. I also think your white gospel point is a good one and one I hadn't thought of. I will certainly continue to offer my honest critiques on the Beatles and their solo work with out the regular pandering I see so much of in the TH-cam community. When I do critiques like this I get the typical butt-hurt fanboy response who attack my character, which essentially removes them from the conversation. I appreciate the feedback!
Hear hear, excellent, love this, expresses my thoughts better than I could possibly do...except I really dig "I Dig Love". Now here's me showing how it was done ha! th-cam.com/video/ZQ3o9I7zyhE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=eVuqZ4y9NXAQGQRc
I agree, Apple Jam was a throw in just so that it is a 3 disc set. Plus the extra length of tunes and the extra "Isn't It A Pity" is filler for sure. Beware of Darkness is my favourite on the album. It has to be a double album because it would be hard to reduce it to a single disc. There are few songs I would drop but "I Dig Love" could be dropped but I don't think the album can be reduced to a single album. It is interesting to think of stripping back the production and making it feel like a more personal statement.
I think it would have been a great single album.. John’s Plastic ono band album with “ working class hero “ & “ Mother “ etc .. was way better & so was Ram !
Great breakdown of the album and I agree with most everything you said other than I may like Let It Down a little more than you. As far as the lawsuits, I wanted to mention a couple of things. George maintained that he based My Sweet Lord's melody on Oh Happy Day which is an old hymn that had been a hit for the Edwin Hawkins Singers in 1969. In listening to them it sounds a lot like My Sweet Lord. I tend to believe George as it was recently a hit and it is a religious song that George would probably be very interested in at the time. Possibly He's So Fine took its melody from Oh Happy Day. In any case, being that it was in the public domain I don't see why Harrison lost the case. For me, too many similarities and as far as I'm concerned both He's So Fine and My Sweet Lord are ultimately derived from a much older public domain source. And the song Stewball is also an old traditional song so Lennon couldn't be guilty of copyright infringement being that it was in the public domain.
Some songs can have renewed copyrights and they don't necessarily have to be on the melody but on the arrangement as well. It still seems to have many gray areas. Just as any performer who was ripped off by Led Zeppelin. Thanks for the comments, stickman!
I think the album is virtually perfect. Exempting the Apple Jam disc. There are a few lesser cuts on the double LP, but I think overall the level of consistency is astonishing.
I could tell anyone who complains about All Things Must Pass to go to the clinic and have their hearing checked, but that would just be my opinion, bro. However, Matt's objectively mistaken when he pooh-poohs the size of George's backlog. The super deluxe box set debunks that. The 1970 release had 16 original George compositions. That's not counting "If Not for You" or the alternate "Isn't It a Pity" or the feared Apple Jam. Discs 3 and 4 (on CD) have 10 songs that were not in the original release in any form. Plus "Woman Don't You Cry for Me," which is on Disc 5. Add 'em up and that's 27 songs. Seems pretty big to me. BTW even that's not counting "Everybody Nobody" ( a proto version of "Sir Frankie Crisp") or the revisited "Sour Milk Sea" or the gorgeous demo of Dylan's "I Don't Want To Do It" or "Almost 12 Bar Honky Tonk," which was going to be part of the dreaded Apple Jam. Let's give Matt bonus points for originality, if nothing else. You can't accuse him of just relying on the ritual ZOMG WALL OF SOUND!!1!! or ZOMG APPLE JAM!!1!! tropes.
I absolutely agree. There is no reason to have 2 versions of Isn't It A Pity - just choose the best take and tighten it up - no need to make it like a Hey Jude refrain going on and on. The whole thing should've been stripped down with no mush, and no Apple Jam disc! And you're right, there is a glow over his career work where they elevate George almost above all the other Beatles - I think Living in the Material World is a boring album but many fans seem to think it's almost right up there with ATMP. His '70s records after ATMP I think were terrible.
Lennon also got lucky on “Starting Over” as the melody on the lyrics “But when I see you darling, It's like we both are falling in love again” is a direct (perhaps subconscious) lift from The Beach Boys “Don’t Worry Baby” in the part where the lyrics are “But she looks in my eyes And makes me realize And she says "don't worry, baby"
I guess you had to be there in 1970. We were hungry for anything “Beatle” at this point. That said something about this album stuck a chord with a 14 year old me. So much so, I have collected several variations of cd, Cassette, 8 track and the reel to reel. Not to mention multiple variations of the Lp as released over the years. I agree there’s a few songs that aren’t that great but none that you listed and none I would ever skip over. I Love Wah wah, Art of dying and I dig love. All that said your review was a sobering and honest look at a record I’ve loved for 53 years and counting. Never saw that connection with Peter Paul and Mary or Humble Pie.
Great video as always. I actually rank "I'd Have You Anytime" higher - it's an absolute classic for me. The "2nd batch of 6" that you said were OK I think are actually really good The ones you called "filler" are decent though admittedly not great, but still better than the bottom half of Lennon and McCartney's solo work. "Behind that locked Door" is really good. "I Dig Love" could be great if it had more (and less repetitive) lyrics. "The Art of Dying" is fantastic and gives me chills. I think it's the wah wah pedal that sounds dated to most people today. To be honest I've listened to the jams songs exactly once just like you said and feel no need to go back to it, although I agree "Out of the Blue" could have been something. Good point about the backlog myth. I also agree the sound is muddied, as are most post-Beatles albums. I only bought this album as the 30th anniversary version and the new version of My Sweet Lord is arguably better than the original although his voice was almost destroyed by cancer at that point. Disappointed you didn't mention the outtake "I Live For You" which is fantastic and absolutely baffling that it was left off (clarification - left off the album originally). I go back and forth between this and Living In The Material World as my favorite GH album. Nobody gives it any respect but I love introspective spiritual George. His songs went downhill fast after that, although Cloud 9 has some really good tunes mixed of course with filler, and Brainwashed almost doesn't exist to most Beatles purists which is a real shame because I think it's maybe his 3rd best album. I'd love to hear your thoughts on it.
Hey gigglehertz. Thank you for the substantive comments. I left off I Live For You sor the sake of video length... I was running the risk of overdoing it like George did with the album!
@@erniericardo8140 After watching this I went back over George's catalog on TH-cam music (the ones I don't own) and his S/T album is better than I remember. I think I sampled it a while back and wasn't impressed so never picked it up. It might be my #5 now.
There is no backlog myth. Paul had some material sure, but a lot of that in on the McCartney album. Not bad stuff but there's no way those songs are as substantial as any of the tracks on All Things Must Pass. John had some material but in very early stages and I don't think any of those are on Plastic Ono Band. If he had better material during Let it Be he would have focused on that instead of including Dig It.
I agree about Beware of Darkness being one of his if not THE best songs. Oddly enough I enjoy listening to the rough demo over the final produced track. The song is unfinished and includes the non sequitur "Beware of ABKCO" line , but I like the "pushing you in puddles" line, which I wish he left in the final track. The vocal on the demo has more emotional intensity, but both are still great.
Harrison played slide guitar using standard tuning. He did not use open chords like Duane Allman or Ry Cooder. That may be the reason no one copies his style. Listen to Badfinger's Day After Day. That is a great slide guitar playing..
I agree the Day After Day solo is excellent but that is a beautiful tone he uses that I wish he had kept for himself. The standard tuning also dumbs down his slide as it strays too far from the blues for my tastes. Also, the standard tuning necessitates single string playing which is also a bit weak. Thanks Richard!
Great review! Refreshing take on some of the motives behind the albums length. None of The Beatles could claim the high ground w/r to plagarism- I was shocked hearing the similarities between John's 'God' and Ketty Lester's 'Love Letters'🫣
I’ve always found Beware of Darkness to be his finest composition (although Something is a better track, due to the Beatles’ work). Not just the lyrics but also the music, with this colorful, slightly dissonant set of chord changes that work thanks to the way the melody seamlessly weaves in and out of them. I entirely agree about the overblown production and excessive runtime somewhat tarnishing some of the compositions and perhaps not getting their full potential. One way to look at it is that Old Brown Shoe, a very similar song to anything on ATMP, could have been an overblown upbeat track in the mold of Art of Dying or Wah Wah. But the Beatles elevated it from a decent George song to a great track because of their arranging skills, musicianship (esp. the drum groove and George’s 8-bar lead) and production values. This is the reason I put something like “Isn’t It A Pity” in my wish list of Beatles songs. Not because it’s George’s best song, but because I’m trying to think of the potential it had to be a timeless classic track if the Beatles had put their magic touch on it. But I don’t put “Beware of Darkness” in that wish list because I love it so much for what it already is (even though the Beatles probably would have made it a masterpiece too).
The day All Things Must Pass was released, I went with several friends to a girlfriends basement to listen to it. We all really liked it but I found that over time I've listened to it less than most other albums, Beatles or otherwise. One thing to consider Matt, the long outro to songs such as, Isn't A Pity, She's So Heavy from Abby Road and many other songs wasn't just a Phil Spector thing, it was popular back then as a way to enhance the experience of being stoned. As I've mentioned at other times, during that period, the music was made by freaks for freaks. The Beatles may have had a wider audience than most other groups but the production of George's songs shows that he was less concerned with appealing to mainstream culture, AM radio listeners, than he was in making music for those who were into the same things in which he was.
I've always had the impression that George's slide guitar style has been influential. Before "All Things Must Pass," slide guitar in general had been more bluesy, less melodic. Two examples off the top of the head of tracks where I hear his influence are America's "Sister Golden Hair" and Bruce Springsteen's "Man's Job."
I have a closer personal connection to Living in the Material World. Its clearer and cleaner than ATMP. The song, LITMW, combines rock with Indian-flavoured inerludes, John, Paul and Ritchie.. It's the ultimate Harrisong.
George is my favorite Beatle, and I like more of his solo work than any of the others. The genres he focused on just gelled with me the best i think. But even if the album has problems, I still believe it is the best Beatles solo album. I just can’t compare it to anything the other three did. It really was George spreading his wings even if maybe the whole thing wasn’t stockpiled songs, and it’s beautiful. ❤
I've been a huge Beatles fan since I was a little kid, but it was not until I was an adult that I first listened to "All Things Must Pass" beyond the big singles, "My Sweet Lord" and "What is Life." Knew there was a lot of hype surrounding the album. It was a mixed experience listening to it at such a remove from when it came out. There are several very good tracks that I was not familiar with. But, as you point out, there is more than a little filler on the album. So your effort to recalibrate the scales of criticism for this album is well taken. The story of "My Sweet Lord" is very interesting. Its resemblance to The Chiffons "He's So Fine" is unmistakeable. But there is a reason why Harrison might not have realized the connection, an area you didn't delve into. Harrison would later say that "Oh Happy Day" by the Edwin Hawkins Singers was his main inspiration. Listening today to "Oh Happy Day," which was a huge international hit in the late 60s, you can see why. The feel is very similar, though the melody is a little different. Harrison, of course, was repurposing gospel music from its Christian roots for more Hindu/ecumenical messaging. You can really hear the gospel roots of "My Sweet Lord" come through in the well done Billy Preston version that came out earlier in 1970 and on which Harrison played. (Preston's 1970 "Encouraging Words" album holds up very well and shows what the possibilities of Beatles compositions in the hands of someone who was a native soul musician). The Chiffons' 1975 cover of "My Sweet Lord" is pretty good too. Finally, you were a bit rough on Harrison's slide guitar playing. You says that no guitar players emulate Harrison's style. I don't know that to be true, but even if true I am not sure you are drawing the right conclusions from that fact. Some people have a distinctive style that other musicians leave alone. They do so for a variety of reasons: it's hard to replicate well, or out of respect, or to do it themselves would seem derivative since it's so identified with a particular player. I'm thinking of B.B. King's distinctive lead guitar playing. I'm sure there are folks who try to closely mimic King's guitar playing, but I don't see it as widely copied, except perhaps in odd precincts of the guitar world. For a critical appreciation of Harrison's slide playing, I would want to hear from some authoritative sources. To my ears, his playing can be a bit too syruppy, but sometimes it is just what the doctor ordered. (For instance, I really like his slide playing on "Handle With Care," his great Traveling Wilbury's song). My understanding is that Harrison's slide playing stands out because he was so immersed in the sitar and Indian musical composition. I do agree that it would have been nice for Harrison to keep working on his lead guitar chops post-Beatles. Instead, he generally left such stuff to Clapton and other gunslingers. That said, Harrison had to work hard to justify being The Beatles' lead guitarist, especially with the able Paul McCartney so close and so eager to set down his Hofner and give the guitar a try. Harrison's best lead work tended to be carefully worked out and undoubtedly was the product of prodigious effort on his part.
George's slide playing certainly improved over time, culminating with some great playing on Brainwashed. I hate his tone on All Things Must Pass and wish he would have used the tone and smoothness from his Day After Day solo.
This album stands up today just as when it was released. Is it perfect? No but I still play it to this day. Can’t say that about any other solo project from the fabs. I accept the dogma of praise!
What serendipity. I just got an OG US box Set last week and I thought it sounds good. I'm already familiar with this album having listened to it via streaming. Owning this box set now, I can say this is one of those albums that one have to experience on vinyl. I agree with the 3rd disc but it's hard for me to cherry pick and whittle the album down to single disc ( a la White Album debates). Listening to the entire album all the way through, I had this impression that after 2 discs of serious, heavy themed songs, the 3rd disc is where the musicians let their hair down and have a party. Still not essential, though. The recent anniversary box set had more outtakes though, and I wondered if George spent a few more months working on a 3rd disc of proper songs how it will sound. If you're gonna go big, go big, right?
Great take overall. Handful of places I differ: - I like the bubblegum sound of his slide playing because it’s juxtaposed with non-bubblegum music. The effect is to add charm. - Flyte is a current Harrison-influenced band that sometimes emulates that slide sound - try “I’ve Got a Girl” (the slide part starts around 1:40). - I think “Wah wah” is underrated. I dance around to it, and it’s on my exercise mix. The sound may be excessively cacophonous, but it makes the track feel like a party, so I would have wanted it pulled back only like 15%. - I don’t understand the bit about the wall of sound not working well when there’s a band. A group of musicians was playing in both instances. Maybe a better way to put it is the sound of each instrument was much thinner in the early Spector days, so when the differentiation was reduced, there was a better effect than when each instrument already sounded thick on its own? - I never fully understood the appeal of “Beware of Darkness.” I went back to it after this video and appreciated it a little more, but to me, the melody is meandering, and the arrangement (and George’s voice) are not dynamic enough to make up for it. (Plus, what’s a falling swinger?)
I have no problem calling it the best Beatles solo album just based on the songs alone. I hate the wall of sound too but All things must pass also doesn’t sound like it was recorded in his basement like John and Paul’s first albums and Beware of darkness is easily the best song of all 3. As far as My Sweet lord(which isn’t a favorite of mine because of the chanting) plagiarism goes I’ll go to my grave saying you can’t copyright a chord progression (if so Chuck berry should have been wealthier than Bezos) George by his own admission wasn’t a top tier lead guitarist (“What you guys need is an Eric Clapton”) But he was coming off of Abbey Road where his Lead guitar helped make that album(something is as great a solo as you’ll ever hear) And he did have Clapton and Frampton( kinda old and young guns there)He did kinda shoot his load with All Things but it was a heluva load lol. Another great video Matt 👍
Thanks for the comments, DB. It was good that he had Frampton and Clapton on the record. It really elevated the playing. By the way, Lennon's response to “What you guys need is an Eric Clapton” was "What we need is a George Harrison."
A bold and timely take on this overrated "classic." Actually, I think it is generally good, and it would be my top solo Beatles release as a two sided album. My Sweet Lord, Isn't It a Pity, Apple Scruffs, What Is Life, All Things Must Pass, and a couple others, are classics, and I strongly disagree with you about Harrison's very melodic, standard tuning slide guitar playing. Having said that, "bloated" is exactly the word that always comes to mind when I think of this album. The backing musicians are excellent, but Phil Spector, in my opinion, does not do any favors to Harrison with his production. It is dated by the standards of the time, and most importantly, today, it sounds muddy and overall, like crap. Perhaps I am biased, because I strongly dislike Spector's overblown production of several otherwise first rate Beatles songs (e.g., The Long and Winding Road, Across the Universe, etc.) as well.
I'm glad you mentioned "Hear Me Lord" because it's a gem not frequently discussed! I was hooked on it so much at a time that I was hearing it in my head being played even in my sleep!!! Too bad that its live "Bangladesh" version is still in the can! It would also fit the 74 tour perfectly, even sung with his raspy voice! But he did not include it, unfortunately. As for "All Things Must Pass", I cannot really count the different copies I have of it, definitely more than 10, including 5 different versions of the 50th anniversary releases! Thanks for the review...
Hi Matt - I didn't really take notice of "ATMP" until its re-issue in 2001 and was very pleasantly surprised at how good it was; I think I resisted it because it was a triple album and so beyond my pocket for many years, and the original LP looked very dour to me ! For me, this would have been an amazing double album. I never understood the reason behind including the Apple Jam tracks back in 1970 yet their inclusion on the double CD in 2001 seemed to be the perfect outtakes. The track that really stood out for me was "The Art Of Dying" although the best song on the album is "Beware Of Darkness" in my humble opinion. Cheers Tim
I wonder how much our childhood and early-life memories color our impressions of music we heard in those times. All Things Must Pass played a lot in our house through the 70s. I associate every song with something happy from childhood, so I can't hear the "overproduction" as anything but joyous. And that goes especially for Wah Wah, which would be in my top 3 song on the album. Is that the "happy memory" effect? Well, Red Rose Speedway and Venus & Mars were also on our turntable a lot, and I barely recall a note from those discs, while Band on the Run brings back the same feelings as All Things Must Pass. So, there must be something great about the music in the first place. I think you underrate this album quite a bit Matt. I'd be curious to know what was happening in your life when you first heard the album, and if that could have colored your opinion.
I noticed the same thing recently. I got into an online argument about a top 20 albums of all time and after I posted mine I went back and listened to a few from the 80s and 90s with an open mind and some just weren't as good as I remember, or as good as other albums by the same artist. We fall for the hype and praise at the time. Of course our musical tastes also drift over time.
Well Michael, I called this album the best or in the top 3 best solo albums, so I don't know why you wouldn't accept my praise. I also called out the strongest songs - of which I opined that Beware of Darkness is one of his great works. My has been idyllic and this album was never one I could listen to all the way through although it has some of the best work of his solo career.
@@popgoesthe60s52 Sorry, I really did enjoy hearing the praise you gave. I was probably overreacting to the second half of the video. Sometimes I just can't understand why anyone would dislike Wah Wah! :) I think it was in the 2000 reissue liner notes where Harrison said he wanted to remove Spector's reverb on the song before releasing it, and Clapton urged him not to. When it comes to the wall of sound on All Things, people's perceptions vary wildly. I think it's interesting why this might be.
What it really comes down to IMHO is the Songwriting. That is the forte of The Beatles legacy. The Songwriting on this is stunning. No clunkers for me. As an Atheist I should actually not like a fair amount of the lyrics. Although I do enjoy the occasional digs at Catholicism. Even so, this is a Songwriting bonanza. I also rate Harrison as one of the best and most creative Slide Players. Certainly the most melodic. His gift for Harmony on Slide and especially Vocals is second to very few. Art Of Dying is one of my favorites on the Album. The lyrics are so poignant.
For me thats the magic of (say) My Sweet Lord for example, even if youre not a religious or a spirtual person, that song has a strange effect or power that everytime I listen to it, no matter how many times I hear that song it always gets me (without wanting) singing along with the chorus and has me feeling good and kind of "sanctified" and uplifted (Same with Edwin Hawkins song Oh Happy Day)
In a way, Dylan and Harrison did team up for an album -- two, in fact. There are other people on it as well, but it's definitely the two of them very much working together.
A testimony to the greatness of the songs on ATMP is that each song overcame the excesses of Spector’s wall of sound. Regarding the overall product, as a lead guitarist, I used to play Apple Jam as background to whatever I was doing. I loved it. My only disagreement with your take is Art of Dying. Bobby Whitlock said that it could’ve been Derek and the Dominoes…it was that good. Even more than the driving nature of this song are the words. I am not a reincarnation kind of guy, but if I were, this song could be an anthem for that belief system. The poetry and underlying meaning is simply amazing. If you’re not into Claptonesque stylings with reincarnation themes, I get your dismissive reaction. For me, the song is a masterpiece.
Yeah the brass arrangement is wicked too. I did the album live and Art Of Dying was a highlight, it rocks! Lots of words to try and remember but.th-cam.com/video/ormCakgOpRs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=w0VT_3_Sk16ccIsB
All Things Must Pass is a great and moving record. But RAM will always be my favourite Beatles solo record for its sheer inventiveness and unrestrained creativity - just like with McCartney, Paul seems to try anything and just have fun, and since he's a musical genius, it works out amazingly. Also, I find ATMP too preachy for my taste at some points.
At the time the album was so good. I think because we always got a track or two from George on Beatles albums. Sometimes those tracks were better or as good as any if the Lennon/McCartney songs on the particular record. So in general we always wondered what a solo record of George could be. When it came out is was very welcoming to the public. The songs were very strong, over produced yes but well written and thoughtful. Like you said 12 of the songs were really good. A single album less produced would have been epic. He was never going to be Page or Clapton or any of the other top guitarist of the day but his guitar was sweet, tasteful, minimum. His guitar was the Beatles sound so he never needs to apologize for that. To be one of 4 of the most famous and loved musicians on earth is pretty heady stuff. How they stayed as grounded and decent as human beings (though not perfect) still is amazing.
11:54 It was the 2000 remaster and the augmented demo of "Let It Down" that convinced me it was a beautiful song. As George said around that time "it's quite good, but it's very big. If I could, I would reduce the studio sound down a bit." The 2020 remix definitely helps the sound of the album version, of course.
@@prettyshinyspaghetti8332 At the time, it was nice to actually hear the lyrics. "Let It Down" wasn't the only song on the album that had this problem.
All Things Must Pass is one of those records that I've just about worn out, over decades of listening to it - so interesting and thought provoking to hear your review and perspectives! It makes me feel like I'm listening to a beloved album for the first time again, which is something magical
We were in the Army in Germany when this was released. Played it once; put it on a shelf, then put Led Zeppelin III(released the month before) on the turntable and cranked it up...All my buddies agreed: Much, much better. It didn't hurt that we were smoking the 'Best of the Becaa Valley' at the time...Frankly, it was a complete and utter slog through the album. The production and mix were horrible, even for the best stereo systems of the time and we had the high powered Sansui systems with huge bookshelf speakers bought from the base PX. Should have been a single LP.
Two things: 1. All Things Must Pass is as good as any Beatles solo album. 2. Harrison and Dylan DID do an album together. It was called Traveling Willburys (ok, I realize there were others involved as well…)
I'm so pleased to find someone who shares most of my views about this album; I wasn't previously aware that anything less than uncritical adoration was allowed. Whilst I fully respect the opinions of its devotees, I don't understand the extreme levels of reverence it attracts. To be clear, there is some excellent music here but it is way over-produced and there is too much filler. My personal opinion is that it benefitted hugely from being first out of the traps post the Beatles' break-up. There, I said it.
This is a very fair review. I wonder if many of the original reviewers had bothered to listen to the whole album, because it runs out of steam by side 3 and was never a worth a triple disc. I love the songs, but it should've been a 10 track single disc, with some tracks held back for a new release in 71/72. The production makes some tracks feel dated (Art Of Dying) and others overblown (Wah Wah), while Isn't It A Pity should be shorter and just have one version. But there are so many gems, so it feels wrong to complain- the joy of Apple Scruffs, the hypnotic feel of Frankie Crisp, the spirituality of Beware of Darkness and the simplicity of Behind The Locked Door. The album reflects the mood of 1970, with uncertainty and some hopeful optimism for a new decade.
I couldn't agree more, Matt, that the album could have/would have been well served by a spare, Plastic Ono Band type approach. It would have let the songs, melodies, and above all, emotions, speak for themselves. Agree 100% about your valuing of the lyrics. Yes. Let the songs breathe, let us hear the lyrics. And the spaces between the lyrics. I mean, truly, I'd have loved for this album to be adapted as a Beatles production, in the "Get Back" style. Room of course for George to shine and do what he wanted, yet with timely, apt, and tasteful contributions from the others. And short of that, I'd have preferred a quieter, more intimate production. Something akin to the sound of "Long, Long, Long" (which is one of my favorite George songs, and one I think is tragically unsung). Anyway, thanks as always your hard work and the conversation!
I think in the My Sweet Lord plagiarism case, people miss the Oh Happy Day component. George said he thought he was ripping off Oh Happy Day. It was in public domain. Only problem, Bright Songs had already ripped it off with He's So Fine, which they had the copyright for.
@@benmeltzer I don't get your comment at all. Did you mean to reply to me? My comment is about both songs sounding like Oh Happy Day. The lyrics were never in question.
@@benmeltzer Even so, I never said George got a raw deal or My Sweet Lord didn't sound like He's So Fine. Oh Happy Day is certainly closer in theme to My Sweet Lord. I'm thinking when George was playing Oh Happy Day, he probably said at some point, "this sounds like He's So Fine". Phil Spector should had steered him away from sounding too much like it.
The original box set also came with a roughly two by three foot poster of George. I remember when I first opened the box set when it first came out and saw the folded poster. The catch is, the roughly square foot section that I first saw was solid dark brown and I said oh, oh. I was hoping for some neato poster of George and so far, it was just solid dark brown. In the end, it was an ok poster but I was hoping for something better.
I think the over the top production was exactly what that album needed. I also think it was the right decision to have those "filler" tracks and apple jams on there, because it adds to the larger than life vibe; this makes it unique in harrisons catalogue, which sometimes can be very dry, sparse and in its worst moments joyless; a stripped back ATMP would be a lot like "Living In The Material World", which is a great album as well (at least for me), but why should he have done the same thing twice in a row? A single-album ATMP would have been a stellar masterpiece of course, but the crazyness of that triple release is what makes it that mythical juggernaut amonst the beatle-solo albums, and is why many consider it the #1 solo-album, so also in hindsight right decision by Harrison (and Spector) Anyway: great review as always!
I think it's over produced. A lot of tracks are too busy, with too many layers and too many musicians on it. It's also the most un'-Beatle sounding of the solo albums.
The album is flawed. It does not need the third disc but every song on the album is worthy of note. My favorites are Let It Role, Behind That Locked Door, Run Of The Mill and What Is Life. The songs padded? Maybe but no song outstays its welcome. Wah Wah was written in January 1969 when he left the Get Back sessions for a few days. The Art Of Dying I believe is about Brian Epstein. I totally agree with you about Phil Spector's cluttered production. That is why this latest attempt to remix the album has caused some bad feeling in certain quarters. My Sweet Lord / He's So Fine. I can listen to both songs and enjoy them without thinking one is a rip off of the other. The end of the court case gave George the royalties for both songs in some territories and the owner of He's So Fine "Allen Klein?" in others. George's guitar playing. He let Eric Clapton do the lion's share of the lead guitar but George is no shirker and what hardly ever gets touched on is the wonderful work he was doing with artists like Doris Troy, Billy Preston and Jackie Lomax around this time. He had to handle the main guitar work in Living In The Material World because Eric Clapton was not around. Poor George supplied Apple Jam with the best of intentions. It was supposed to be a free disc for the fans but he did not think of the extra weight for freight and manufacture which ended up reflected in the price. The album is flawed but that I think is part of its charm. It is still George's masterpiece. Great review.
I have to say, you boldly go where even fools fear to tread. Even the most sincere reappraisal of a Beatles-related album can draw a lot of ire from the religious. Hiding within this bloated album is an excellent debut, but as a double album, it really drags. The wall-of-sound production begins to grow exhausting before the first disc is done. The two versions of "Isn't it a Pity" is one version too many. The second disc really bogs down in its own dreariness. Had Harrison taken the best songs and pared this down to a single disc, not only would it stand tall against many contemporaries, he also would have had some more material to pad out the very thin "Living in the Material World", which definitely needed *something* to pad it. As for "Apple Jam", jamming is one thing Harrison (and all the Beatles except maybe Ringo) just couldn't do. I will say that there's something about the epic size of this album that makes it feel greater than the sum of its parts, but in the end, it isn't enough to keep me awake to the end.
You state it better than I did! Yes, the second disc drags and the production is so stifling that I never listen to this all the way through. These negative type of reviews do 'offend' the most strident followers and I often lose subscriptions after reviews like this but the adulation has always been about supporting poor George after being kept down by Lennon-McCartney. Edit: see the comment by victorarena23, whose I read right after yours.
I one thing that you can’t deny is that all things must pass, is probably a better rounded album van in the of the other solo Beatles releases. That and the production may be be a bit over blown because of Phil Spector‘s production, but George does draw in a range of talent of talented musicians, including Clapton, which may have met an extra bit of oomph . Remembering that George Harrison then went on to form the travelling Wilburys that does point to his ability to bring out the best in musicians
Beatles freak here - born 1957: Quality was just about never the same once Lennon and McCartney were broke up (and no more George Martin). Exceptions are Imagine and Maybe I'm Amazed. Believe George H. has some masterpieces and other really good songs, but his "well" far below many besides John and Paul (EJ, Joel, Bruce, Zep, Sabbath, Richards / Jagger, even Alice Cooper Band and soo many more). None of post Beatles albums rivaled Beatle albums and best to me are: Band On Run/Venus and Mars. George masterpieces are: Gently Weeps and Here Comes The Sun, period. I actually think What Is Life is underrated. Lastly, seems perhaps his song writing should have improved, but was suppressed by two of the best ever. Always thought early, early promise and a much underrated song is Don't Bother Me - never hear any mention of it - never, but I love it - as John once said about All My Loving (another winner of many): "Its a darn good piece!"
Just for fun, here’s a single LP version Side 1 - My Sweet Lord, Wah Wah, What Is Life, Behind That Locked Door, Let It Down, Run Of The Mill Side 2 - Beware Of Darkness, Apple Scruffs, Ballad Of Sir Frankie Crisp, All Things Must Pass, Art Of Dying, Isn’t It A Pity
I love the wall of sound production on this album, especially on songs like Awaiting on you all. I'm an American, and I've always loved Spector's wall of sound
I think there was an unwritten rule in the music business that you didn't sue over similar chords or lyrics, because everybody did that. Led Zeppelin's first album being an infamous example of musical plagiarism. The "My Sweet Lord" lawsuit could have set a precedent but didn't.
George and the lads worked over 60 hours in Abbey Road on single All Things Must Pass. P & J were helpful and encouraging. Clapton and his Dominos were fab on the triple album, then primed they did Derrick's masterpiece album the next year. Matt, George wasn't depressing... he was real. God I just adore Every song on this jewel.
I’d say if you condensed all things must past into a single album it would clearly be the best Beatles solo album but I still rank it as the best debatably. I like how it’s hard to choose the best Beatles solo album. The fact that there isn’t a clear winner really shows how much each member was bringing to the band as a whole.
It's hard to imagine disagreeing with you more about this album. The songs you thought were mediocre or "filler" were almost entirely great IMO. And I listen to Apple Jam all the time. "Out of the Blue" is one of my favorite tracks on the album. The only songs I kind of agree with you about are "Wah-Wah" and "It's Johnny's Birthday". It's a fantastic album IMO. Also, George has most definitely been praised by other guitarists for his slide work.
@MichaelPhillips, I couldn't agree with you more in disagreeing with Matt about this album! I also love George's slide playing and have heard plenty of praise for it among my musician friends. To dismiss it because it didn't spawn a slew of copycats is a mindless view, IMO. Sometimes something is so unique and personal it's too obvious to copy. The one piece I would have done without is "It's Johnny's Birthday".
I dismissed it because I don't like it and I find his slide mediocre compared to the slide playing of Walsh, Taylor, Page, Frampton, etc. Copying and emulating a guitar technique is a show of liking it. To suggest my opinion is mindless is rather patronizing.
Wow Matt, heresy! I agree for the most part...However I love "most" of the album. I also consider his guitar work became weaker, including towards the end of the Beatles endeavors. As for ripping off music, ALL song composers are guilty to some degree, I admit it. We all have tunes, jingles, orchestral pieces that flit about the brain and influence "original" songs. Was it Zappa who said: 7 notes, 12 with accidentals nothing is completely original. Harrison got hosed on the "She's So Fine" decision. Thanks you're appreciated.
The Apple Jam disc is similar to the Rascals' "Music Music" disc from their 1969 album "Freedom Suite." It's basically a bunch of musicians jamming and going nowhere. If you want good jams, you have to start with great songs. Songs like "Whipping Post" or "Eyes Of The World." That said, I don't think there is much filler at all on the first two discs, and "Wah Wah" is among my favorite George songs ever. I like the overproduction.
As far as the production, they did a remix of the album in 2020 with the original reverb and production techniques stripped/minimized on many songs. I thought it was much better.
Great review, thanks, i really like all the songs on this album, I always felt Harrison should have released a single disc album with half of the songs, and gone back a year or so later and released a number of the others along with some other newer material, and would have gotten two really good albums.
There’s a great video in you ranking all of the Beatles solo work and then maybe a fan ranking after. I completely respect your critique of all things must pass and would love to see what you put over it. I have all things must pass at number one but I also think I’m in the minority of people who really enjoys what the wall of sound does on this album. Another good idea for these type of videos is to make a “give your own review” post on your community page here and then go over some comments at the end of your review videos. Not trying to be too picky though, really love you vids and I could discuss Beatles all day.
A lot of George Harrison's solo work hasn't aged well, but All Things Must Pass, will always be one of the top solo works from former Beatles. It is a little bloated, but is a satisfying listening experience.
So, the album is a flawed masterpiece. When it came out in 1970 it captured the times. The Beatles had passed. The 60s had passed. Optimism for a quick end to the Viet Nam war had passed. In that context George's spirituality was refreshing. But, your critical comments are accurate and well supported. A shorter, more focused album could have been even better. In reference to your comment on Harrison's slide playing style, perhaps it is not emulated more often because the lines are almost always closely wedded to the melody of the song. e.g. the unforgettable riff on Badfinger's "Day After Day". George is not usually given to spontaneous improvisation. When it is done it sounds like Harrison. Think "Sister Golden Hair" by America. Thanks getting me back into the album!
Huge Beatles fan, and I would say George was my favorite. That being said, I thought when it came out that it should have been one disk and maybe save a song or two for the next album. Same thought I had with the White Album.
13:56 Apple Jam... yeah, I only really came to appreciate it when I got into superfluous 21st century post-rock space rock psychedelia (where 10 minute songs are the norm)... That is, I like a long jam for its nothing-burger tone it out and work on things quality. This really doesn't say much for the disc. I'll put it on if I'm on a road trip. Considering all the lil gems he had that could've been developed into songs ("I Live For You," "Woman Don't You Cry For Me," "Rocking Chair In Hawaii," etc.), he could've lost a few on the main album and slid in a few there and kept it "George Harrison's New White Album" instead... I think there was just a bit of the bravado of "hey, I'm an ex-Beatle and Imma do a TRIPLE ALBUM nobody's done that before!!!" or, as you say, belief that everything he put to tape was good.
I only recently discovered Pop Goes The 60's. I have been enjoying it very much. I thought this assessment of All Things Must Pass was quite refreshing.
26:37 Another thing to note, of course, is that outtakes from the ATMP period (and earlier Beatle-era tunes good and bad) kept appearing on his later albums. "Beautiful Girl" and "Woman Don't You Cry For Me" (the latter I didn't know until... you guessed it, the 2020 box set. I am impressed in George's ability to turn a bluegrass song into a mild disco number) to name a few... from the same album. "Not Guilty," "Circles," and "Rocking Chair In Hawaii" are a few more I remember off the top of my head. He had a few more in demo form during that period too that he never put properly to record.
You've had some hot takes before, but putting "Art of Dying" "if Not For You and "Behind That Locked Door" in the filler section is reaching levels of hotness that scientists never thought possible.
Yeah those 3 songs are my favorites, especially Behind That Locked Door and If Not For You Love that Nashville Skyline type of sound, and Art of Dying interestingly has a pre-disco kind of sound.
No doubt the best solo effort from any of the fab four. Yes there were a couple of fillers and the production was a bit muddy in a couple of the numbers. But the best songs (you mentioned them all) are just sublime. Once again a great video. Thanks.
Remember that "naked" Let It Be version of that album? Maybe there could be a naked All Things Must Pass. I'd stick to the original though. @@docsavage8640
First off for me personally ... I rate Lennon's ... 'Plastic Ono Band Band' as 'The' best post Beatles solo album ... simply harrowing, brutal, primal and simple ... Lennon at his finest and certainly could not have been made (I feel) within the constraints of the Beatles ... Moving on ... Matt ... this is another brutal analysis ... but I feel many people (me included) have thought it but have been unwilling to 'cut against the grain' regarding the overall critical consensus of 'All things must Pass' ... I agree with your thoughts regarding the strong six, possibly seven songs on the album ... My Sweet Lord, What is Life?, All things Must Pass, Isn't it a Pity, Beware of Darkness are my pics ... Your point about when some of those songs were written i.e. during the Beatles period is an excellent observation that I've overlooked. I drank the 'cool aid' regarding The Beatles holding George's creativity back. Your comment about George feeling 'All things Must Pass' may have not received the 'production' it needed under The Beatles umbrella is a mind opener for me. I'd argue that with input from George Martin, Paul, John and Ringo this would have been a fitting end to Abbey Road and The Beatles as a band. Where you would list it on Abbey Road is another question. George stated years ago that he gave one of his "best slide guitar solos" on Belinda Carlisle's 'Runaway Horses' solo album track 'Leave a light on' ... he never actually named the track but he only played 12 string & bass on 'Deep Deep Ocean.' so I'm going to make that assumption or George may have been 'taking the p*ss' ... 🤔 I was suffering PTSD following The Beatles break-up and overlooked some of the 'softer' tracks on the album and the questionable third disc 'jam' ... and to paraphrase you we (me included) just cheered George on ... maybe to get through our post Beatles fame ... I must say that I listen to 'Plastic Ono Band', 'Ram' very frequently ... compared to 'All things must Pass' ... I still however get a great buzz when I hear 'My Sweet Lord', 'What is life?' and especially 'All things Must Pass' on classic radio ... George at his best despite Spector's sledge hammer production ... As always ... love your work Matt 💕
I agree with everything you say, Matt, except your view that despite all its flaws it remains one of the Beatles' best solo albums. It would have been that if it had been released as a single album and had been produced in the way you suggest. Despite the production, there are enough gems to have made a superb single LP. 'My Sweet Lord' is simply wonderful, despite the plagiarism. I bought it when it came out and played it a lot at the time, but then hardly gave it a spin for fifty years.
Lennon (almost) got away with ripping off Berry's "You Can't Catch Me" As MaC said to him: "You know this (Get Back) sounds a lot like YCCM slowed down". Lennon was obliged to settle with Berry by recording and releasing YCCM, hence the R&R Album. I am and have been a huge Beatles fan for 50+ years now but they did acknowledge that they'd appropriate or "borrow" good ideas left right and center. Personal taste is just that; personal. ATMP would certainly be a wonderful album with a more stripped back production, I agree. ATMP is a wonderful album as is, it is the one we got. I fondly remember that summer when the album was recently released and My Sweet Lord was playing on the radio constantly. I was enthralled and thrilled. This was just about the biggest, best song I had ever heard! The sound was so big. Huge! Even the Jam sessions on the album are good fun, I have no qualms reassessing Beatles and solo albums. Personally, and everyone is free to disagree - I think Sgt. P is overrated, and the medley on Abbey Road is a bit of a patchwork, although I love it to bits. Best solo George for me is the self titled album. So laid back and pleasant. Cloud 9 not so much; the production to my ears too much ELO. Just my personal opinions.
The thing with You Can't Catch Me is that is sounds nothing like Come Together. All Lennon needed to do was to change a word or two, but he was too brazen and paid for it. I also love the 1979 lp, possibly my fave album of his.
Fully agree. When I bought this on release, I couldn’t get into it like the mainstream. Every time I tried , I liked it at the beginning but started to get bored because the songs were completely drowned out by noise. Some songs which may have been good were overwhelmed by the cacophony. I believe a more bare production would have helped me to enjoy it.
Another interesting, enjoyable review, Matt! I rank this album pretty high as well (even with that 3rd disc). It does feel though, with this album, that George was possibly trying to set himself apart from his former band (with production, length, playing style and number of musicians), in a grandiose way. The roster of talent assembled here is often wasted or lost in production, but the songs are still some of his best. I have to admit, I’m now curious of what you’ll be saying about “Dark Hoarse”😄
Hey Tom, thanks for weighing in. Some people think I'm a "George-basher". Wait til they hear what I have to say about Lennon and McCartney's solo stuff... not to mention Starkey's!
Very accurate and good review, Matt. Over time, having known the album since it's release date, the "preachy" aspect of some of George's songs has worn thin on me, also a product of the time. Interestingly, in the past, like so many others, I would skip the "Apple Jam" disc, but in recent years having developed more of an interest in solo instrumental guitar artists, I've been giving it more of a serious listen. You didn't mention the 2020 remix which, in my opinion was a bad attempt to "modernize" and "de-Spector" the album. It merely pushed all the instrumentation to the background and pushed George's vocals out front.
It is so impressive to see someone from the next generation get The Beatles as well as you do. I would swear you are really about 67! We agree completely on this album. It is why I still put Ram as my favorite and this second. I can tell you that when this came out after the breakup, most of us were talking about how John and Paul had wasted his talent. But, after just a few listens it takes it's well-earned spot I think. Again...kudos to the production and mostly...your status as a true Beatle Phile!
Another thing that occurs to me as I listen to this album again: "Isn't It A Pity Version 1" has another dig at McCartney. Toward the end of the very long fade out you hear definitely a choir going ♪Na na-na na-na-na-na na-na-na-na Innit a pity?♪ Which, of course, is a poke at "Hey Jude." Not to mention the guitar solos all throughout which are great but just lost in the mix because of how huge it is...
His slide guitar is wonderful
That’s what make Harrison great. His contemporaries like Keith Richards never really evolved as a guitarist other that his discovery of the Open G tuning which eventually made all of his songs sound the same. When the Beatles came on the scene, Harrison could play rock and roll, rockabilly, and Chet Atkins’s style. Harrison eventually evolved into a very unique slide guitar player that when you heard it you knew it was Harrison.
@@tunafish2521 Well said. And his standard tuning approach to slide guitar was most definitely not the norm among his contemporaries.
@@tunafish2521 , I agree- the comment made in the video that his slide playing was "bubblegum" was totally false and out of line.
George's slide playing is instantly recognizable. He had a trademark sound and tone. That was when he developed his own style really.
@@ronroskowske6047seriously. 100%!!!! George's slide guitar is his signature sound!! It's awesome and iconic!!! NOTHING is bubblegum about it! Nothing!
George's slide playing was beautiful, lyrical, distinctive. In NO way 'bubblegum'. And, other bigtime guitarists adore that aspect of his playing (just read the guitar mags.)
I'm glad this album exists and George got it out of his system. I'm also fine with it being named the best solo Beatles album, the triumphant story that comes with it does add to the legacy. George must have thought being a solo star was going to be easy after such a great start.
But, I do think it leads to more evidence that all 4 Beatles really needed eachother to be at their best. This album is basically all the scraps from a guy who was being pushed to his creative peak. But as the 70's progress he does seem to tire of pumping out songs/albums and touring, I don't think being an ex-Beatle was quite as rosy as he thought it would be. He said he wouldn't ever be in a band with Paul again so I don't think he craved The Beatles especially, but I think he is more suited to being in a band (or doing occasional projects inbetween gardening), as the mundane superficiality of the music business must be very tedious for him.
At the end of the day George’s music touches me the most. But my all time favorite solo album is Ram. I never get tired of it, enjoy the heck out of it. Next is Plastic Ono Band, then ATMP. But I love them all !
Ram is quite genius. I consider it Abbey Road or two. Imagine if they made another Beatles album with the best of ATMP and RAM. Bit familiar with Lennon's music as I think he needed Paul to complete a composition
My exact sentiments. No.1 Ram, No.2 Plastic Ono Band, No.3 All Things Must Pass. ATMP is great, but it contains too much bloat, filler and is too samey to sustain itself satisfactorily. The White Album captivates as a double album because of its huge variety as well as quality, and its lack of slide guitar cropping up all over the place. The third disc on ATMP is self aggrandisement from Harrison.
I bought the album straight away.
💜George's songs were beautifully designed and written.....It was a pleasure listening to all the songs and knowing they were all George's. 💜
In 1970, both McCartney (in writing) and Lennon (in song) announced that the Beatles were over, and proceeded to fashon lo-fi, DIY debuts that seemed primarily designed to placate their bruised egos. Lennon was decidedly non-commercial, and McCartney eschewed a sure hit by not releasing "Maybe I'm Amazed" as a single. Ringo made albums simply to keep busy.
George made no such pronouncements, and optimistically declared, "All Things Must Pass". His debut was everything those albums weren't: lush, sprawling, hopeful, and made with the audience in mind. If the production and scope are seen as faults in hindsight, it was exactly what heartbroken Beatle fans needed at the time. John screamed and Paul wimpered. George performed, and helped the audience adjust to the "new normal" that was the fabs' dissolution. That is what makes the set so enduring.
Good point on what fans needed at the time.
All Things Must Pass is a near perfect album. Side One and Side Three are amazing with a range of styles and emotions. The Apple Jams are super fun and Out of the Blue is a sublime song.
😆 🤣 😂 it's not even close to perfect when 1/3 of it is a throwaway disc and he had to include the same song twice to pad it out.
@@docsavage8640I love having both versions of Isn’t It A Pity. I don’t consider the jams a throwaway
I quite agree! @@seldonsinq
The jams are a waste of space.
My God you’re brave Matt kind of dishing this album…hilarious if flawed commentary :- )
I got the CD in 1990. I read so many glowing reviews of this album growing up that I had to listen for myself. It did not disappoint.
Like you, Matt, I got the 2001 remaster and the 2020 remix. Personally, I love the 2020 remix and that the vocals are much clearer and the production stripped down a bit albeit nowhere close to being “naked”.
It’s easy to root for George which I think is why most critics heaped a lot of the praise upon it. I like almost all of the tracks and my favorite is “Run Of The Mill”. I always thought “I Live For You” would have been a nice addition. Perhaps it might have been better for Ringo.
Last but not least, I have heard George’s slide guitar being emulated. On Linda Ronstadt’s “You’re No Good “, Andrew Gold plays lead guitar on it and the slide is very Harrison-esque. Also, “You’re So Vain” by Carly Simon has a very Harrison-like solo played by Jimmy Ryan. There’s also a Beach Boys song called “Marcella” where there is a slide guitar solo played in a similar style to Harrison.
I think Phil Spector was a PIANO (Producer In A Name Only) on this album. The only thing that guy was producing was evidence. 😉 Ok, I’ll stop for now. Excellent review as always, Matt!
Also I would add George's guitar style to America's Sister Golden Hair, Eric Clapton' Let it Rain and Climax Blues Band song I Love You.
Hey Jeff! I will somewhat concede to the solos in You're So Vain / No Good but I would add that those are blues-based which gives them the edge George's work on All Things Must Pass lacks. George's solo on Day After Day is excellent but the tone is wonderful unlike the less serious approach he takes on his first album.
Not sure why this is even the "acid test". I love it and I would never want to reproduce it -- I do feel it's George's thing, or at least that he does it best and so I could ever do a pale imitation.
Matt, I always appreciate your analysis because you take the emotional response out of it and are t a fanboy. Yet you can still show appreciation and respect for George and this album.
I think it’s interesting how of all the four Beatles it was George who sounded the most Beatle-y during their solo careers. This is a classic album, but I think a case could be made that “Cloud Nine” or “33 1/3” are better.
@@Sweetish_Jeff_ I really do love much of the music on this album but some viewers call me "biased against George," a "George basher" and "too harsh." Though I get those responses they are getting fewer as I weed out the fanboys and reel in the more academic and non emotional fan. Of which you are one!
This underscores what I have long thought: one of the biggest tragedies of the breakup of the Beatles was the breakup with George Martin. Aside from Let It Be/Get Back (which of course wasn't fully produced by George) all of the Beatles tracks are well produced and don't sound dated (except one could argue the early music which isn't the production's fault). Yet you have so many solo works that people say "Well that could have been produced better" to the point where it makes the music less enjoyable.
Concur! GM the 5th Beatle - case closed :-)
All things must pass is something special and very unique, so much so I will list here the various releases I have in my music collection.
1: 1988 cd fat box Uk release.
2: Japanese HMCD cd box.
3: 2001 remaster fat box and digipak.
4: 2014 cd reissue.
5: 2021 target limited edition with sticker pack.
6: 50th anniversary 5 CD super deluxe boxset.
7: 50th anniversary splatter vinyl.
8: super deluxe 8 LP vinyl deluxe boxset.
9: Uber crate box.
10: 1970 UK first pressing vinyl.
11: 1970 Canadian first pressing.
12: 1970 EMI Australia triple gatefold sleeve.
13: 2010 40th anniversary reissue x 2.
14: 2017 vinyl boxset reissue.
15: 2001 vinyl remaster.
Plus various bootleg and session outtake CDs.
A bit obsessive perhaps😊
I love when Matt does these Beatle/solo album reviews. With others too, but by himself is always more concise and to the point. Great job!
Thank you, Jeffrey!
In the run-up to release, the album was heralded (here in the UK) as a forthcoming double album. The 3rd LP, the Apple jam disc, was recorded when the musicians were 'mucking about' during the recording sessions. When the double album was eventually released, the Apple Jam disk was included as a bonus disk for fans (in the same way as reissues sometimes have bonus tracks on them), which is why it bears a different label (not the orange apples).
I disagree with the initial comments as I believe it’s very hard to overate this record. There’s so many really great songs in this one. Even the tracks that were growers meaning they don’t have an initial attraction or hook, really sink in over the years. It’s elegant tasteful melodic well sung and well played.
I really do like that you don't hold back on what you think. I never feel you pander to your audience and this is why I keep coming back. Thanks for keeping it honest. Here is why I think it's a great album. 1) The sound is so big and unique. I don't think there is another album that sounds like this one. I really can't think of one. It's that unique. The full Spector treatment on Wah Wah, What is Life, Awaiting you All, Art of Dying and Let it Down are just enormous. A pity for Let it down, because it's a much better song when dialed down, but all of the others benefit from this explosion of Harrison/Spector/Delanney and Bonnie noise. The you have the impact of the big sound on the slower numbers which adds a grandeur that they wouldn't have had if done in another style. Wagnerian was an apt description by one reviewer. 2) It has three obvious hit singles in My Sweet Lord, What is Life and Apple Scruffs. All three are poppy and none of them are insipid. 3) The songs with more of an acoustic feel are just wonderful- Apple Scruffs, I'd Have You Anytime, If Not for You, Behind that Locked Door, If Not for You, Sir Frankie Crisp, etc. Just great. 4) Harrison isn't stuck in one style; you've got songs with a Dylan feel, pop songs, Delaney and Bonnie Songs, Spector girl group songs, Harrisons more hymn like songs- the variety on this album keeps it fresh for a two album listen. Hard to do with a single voice. 5) The lyrics, the lyrics , the lyrics. Harrison walks the lines between personal to universal without being preachy, upset without self pity. (He won't do this agin until the George Harrison album in 1979.) The lyrics are wise and thoughtful and humane. I don't feel dirty like after an Eagles song or full of indifference like a stones song or self pity like a who song or better than like after a Dylan song. 6) The singing. Harrison was the weakest of the three vocalist with the Beatles- easily the weakest, but on this album he's in better voice than on any other album. Even ignoring all of that, I just love his voice on this album. His voice sounds warm and inviting and his falsettos are wonderful . And his backing vocals are just a tour de force. He painstakingly overdubbed most ,if not all, of them and the sound is really good. 7) The slide guitar. It became the sound of many pop songs in the 70's for a reason, his slide playing is just great. You hadn't really heard this type of sound in a pop songs before this, but you heard tons of it after. 8) It's influence. Harrison put out the first of three big albums that were influenced by Delaney and Bonnie (ATMP, Layla and Exile) . The White Gospel feel was popularized by Harrison (after learning it from D and B) and soon copied by many. Combining it with a Spector sound and lyrics that had actual meaning to them was unique and a good listen. 9) I could add some more, but I'll stop there. CRITICISMS: The Apple Jam is not needed. But the Apple Jam was always presented as an extra- like the poster. So I have never considered it the album proper. I Dig Love is awful. The version of Let it Down doesn't really work, although a great acoustic version is included in the Anniversary set. He probably could have been fine with one Isn't it a Pity. He should have dumped version 2 for I live for You. Ah Pete Drakes steel guitar was another great feature of this album. Anyhow, so 3 bum songs out of 18, the rest were all keepers.
Hey Christian. You make a very good point about the uniqueness of this album's sound and the lyrics are strong, perhaps stronger than even Lennon early solo work. There are many great things about this album and many great songs. I am less charitable on the number of great songs than perhaps you are, but some of it comes down to personal taste. I also think your white gospel point is a good one and one I hadn't thought of.
I will certainly continue to offer my honest critiques on the Beatles and their solo work with out the regular pandering I see so much of in the TH-cam community. When I do critiques like this I get the typical butt-hurt fanboy response who attack my character, which essentially removes them from the conversation. I appreciate the feedback!
Hymn-like. Wagnerian. And unique, absolutely. I like some of your adjectives here. And I absolutely agree.
Hear hear, excellent, love this, expresses my thoughts better than I could possibly do...except I really dig "I Dig Love". Now here's me showing how it was done ha! th-cam.com/video/ZQ3o9I7zyhE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=eVuqZ4y9NXAQGQRc
The album is almost perfect. The only songs that could be dropped are "I dig love" and "Isn't It a pity (version 2)"
The album is simply boring. Unlike "John Lennon and POB", Ringo Starr "Beaucoups of Blues" which are just amazing ones.
@@marguskiis7711It has some great moments, but is overrated.
I agree, Apple Jam was a throw in just so that it is a 3 disc set. Plus the extra length of tunes and the extra "Isn't It A Pity" is filler for sure. Beware of Darkness is my favourite on the album. It has to be a double album because it would be hard to reduce it to a single disc. There are few songs I would drop but "I Dig Love" could be dropped but I don't think the album can be reduced to a single album. It is interesting to think of stripping back the production and making it feel like a more personal statement.
I think this album shows the core of George as musician, composer and mystic. Its definite Harrison.
So, he was essentially a MOR pop man.
I think it would have been a great single album.. John’s Plastic ono band album with “ working class hero “ & “ Mother “ etc .. was way better & so was Ram !
'definite' Harrison? - definitive
Yes.
Great breakdown of the album and I agree with most everything you said other than I may like Let It Down a little more than you. As far as the lawsuits, I wanted to mention a couple of things. George maintained that he based My Sweet Lord's melody on Oh Happy Day which is an old hymn that had been a hit for the Edwin Hawkins Singers in 1969. In listening to them it sounds a lot like My Sweet Lord. I tend to believe George as it was recently a hit and it is a religious song that George would probably be very interested in at the time. Possibly He's So Fine took its melody from Oh Happy Day. In any case, being that it was in the public domain I don't see why Harrison lost the case. For me, too many similarities and as far as I'm concerned both He's So Fine and My Sweet Lord are ultimately derived from a much older public domain source. And the song Stewball is also an old traditional song so Lennon couldn't be guilty of copyright infringement being that it was in the public domain.
Some songs can have renewed copyrights and they don't necessarily have to be on the melody but on the arrangement as well. It still seems to have many gray areas. Just as any performer who was ripped off by Led Zeppelin. Thanks for the comments, stickman!
I think the album is virtually perfect. Exempting the Apple Jam disc. There are a few lesser cuts on the double LP, but I think overall the level of consistency is astonishing.
Nah. The Apple Jams stuff is perfection. Badly badly underrated.
I could tell anyone who complains about All Things Must Pass to go to the clinic and have their hearing checked, but that would just be my opinion, bro. However, Matt's objectively mistaken when he pooh-poohs the size of George's backlog. The super deluxe box set debunks that. The 1970 release had 16 original George compositions. That's not counting "If Not for You" or the alternate "Isn't It a Pity" or the feared Apple Jam. Discs 3 and 4 (on CD) have 10 songs that were not in the original release in any form. Plus "Woman Don't You Cry for Me," which is on Disc 5. Add 'em up and that's 27 songs. Seems pretty big to me.
BTW even that's not counting "Everybody Nobody" ( a proto version of "Sir Frankie Crisp") or the revisited "Sour Milk Sea" or the gorgeous demo of Dylan's "I Don't Want To Do It" or "Almost 12 Bar Honky Tonk," which was going to be part of the dreaded Apple Jam.
Let's give Matt bonus points for originality, if nothing else. You can't accuse him of just relying on the ritual ZOMG WALL OF SOUND!!1!! or ZOMG APPLE JAM!!1!! tropes.
I absolutely agree. There is no reason to have 2 versions of Isn't It A Pity - just choose the best take and tighten it up - no need to make it like a Hey Jude refrain going on and on. The whole thing should've been stripped down with no mush, and no Apple Jam disc! And you're right, there is a glow over his career work where they elevate George almost above all the other Beatles - I think Living in the Material World is a boring album but many fans seem to think it's almost right up there with ATMP. His '70s records after ATMP I think were terrible.
Lennon also got lucky on “Starting Over” as the melody on the lyrics “But when I see you darling,
It's like we both are falling in love again” is a direct (perhaps subconscious) lift from The Beach Boys “Don’t Worry Baby” in the part where the lyrics are “But she looks in my eyes
And makes me realize
And she says "don't worry, baby"
I guess you had to be there in 1970. We were hungry for anything “Beatle” at this point. That said something about this album stuck a chord with a 14 year old me. So much so, I have collected several variations of cd, Cassette, 8 track and the reel to reel. Not to mention multiple variations of the Lp as released over the years. I agree there’s a few songs that aren’t that great but none that you listed and none I would ever skip over. I Love Wah wah, Art of dying and I dig love. All that said your review was a sobering and honest look at a record I’ve loved for 53 years and counting. Never saw that connection with Peter Paul and Mary or Humble Pie.
You make some good points about this album. However, I love “The Art of Dying”. :)
Yes indeed
Great lyrics
Great video as always. I actually rank "I'd Have You Anytime" higher - it's an absolute classic for me. The "2nd batch of 6" that you said were OK I think are actually really good The ones you called "filler" are decent though admittedly not great, but still better than the bottom half of Lennon and McCartney's solo work. "Behind that locked Door" is really good. "I Dig Love" could be great if it had more (and less repetitive) lyrics. "The Art of Dying" is fantastic and gives me chills. I think it's the wah wah pedal that sounds dated to most people today. To be honest I've listened to the jams songs exactly once just like you said and feel no need to go back to it, although I agree "Out of the Blue" could have been something. Good point about the backlog myth. I also agree the sound is muddied, as are most post-Beatles albums. I only bought this album as the 30th anniversary version and the new version of My Sweet Lord is arguably better than the original although his voice was almost destroyed by cancer at that point. Disappointed you didn't mention the outtake "I Live For You" which is fantastic and absolutely baffling that it was left off (clarification - left off the album originally). I go back and forth between this and Living In The Material World as my favorite GH album. Nobody gives it any respect but I love introspective spiritual George. His songs went downhill fast after that, although Cloud 9 has some really good tunes mixed of course with filler, and Brainwashed almost doesn't exist to most Beatles purists which is a real shame because I think it's maybe his 3rd best album. I'd love to hear your thoughts on it.
Brainwashed is a fantastic album and one my favorites from George along with his self titled 1979 album👍
Hey gigglehertz. Thank you for the substantive comments. I left off I Live For You sor the sake of video length... I was running the risk of overdoing it like George did with the album!
@@popgoesthe60s52 Sorry meant baffling why it wasn't on the album originally.
@@erniericardo8140 After watching this I went back over George's catalog on TH-cam music (the ones I don't own) and his S/T album is better than I remember. I think I sampled it a while back and wasn't impressed so never picked it up. It might be my #5 now.
There is no backlog myth. Paul had some material sure, but a lot of that in on the McCartney album. Not bad stuff but there's no way those songs are as substantial as any of the tracks on All Things Must Pass. John had some material but in very early stages and I don't think any of those are on Plastic Ono Band. If he had better material during Let it Be he would have focused on that instead of including Dig It.
I agree about Beware of Darkness being one of his if not THE best songs. Oddly enough I enjoy listening to the rough demo over the final produced track. The song is unfinished and includes the non sequitur "Beware of ABKCO" line , but I like the "pushing you in puddles" line, which I wish he left in the final track. The vocal on the demo has more emotional intensity, but both are still great.
I love both as well.
Harrison played slide guitar using standard tuning. He did not use open chords like Duane Allman or Ry Cooder. That may be the reason no one copies his style. Listen to Badfinger's Day After Day. That is a great slide guitar playing..
Yup...as a slide player myself...I still marvel at what he did in standard tuning. I've tried to figure it out and seldom cme close.
I agree the Day After Day solo is excellent but that is a beautiful tone he uses that I wish he had kept for himself. The standard tuning also dumbs down his slide as it strays too far from the blues for my tastes. Also, the standard tuning necessitates single string playing which is also a bit weak. Thanks Richard!
Great review! Refreshing take on some of the motives behind the albums length. None of The Beatles could claim the high ground w/r to plagarism- I was shocked hearing the similarities between John's 'God' and Ketty Lester's 'Love Letters'🫣
George is my favorite slide player and I’m a huge Johnny Winter fan😂😂😂😂❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊
I’ve always found Beware of Darkness to be his finest composition (although Something is a better track, due to the Beatles’ work). Not just the lyrics but also the music, with this colorful, slightly dissonant set of chord changes that work thanks to the way the melody seamlessly weaves in and out of them.
I entirely agree about the overblown production and excessive runtime somewhat tarnishing some of the compositions and perhaps not getting their full potential. One way to look at it is that Old Brown Shoe, a very similar song to anything on ATMP, could have been an overblown upbeat track in the mold of Art of Dying or Wah Wah. But the Beatles elevated it from a decent George song to a great track because of their arranging skills, musicianship (esp. the drum groove and George’s 8-bar lead) and production values.
This is the reason I put something like “Isn’t It A Pity” in my wish list of Beatles songs. Not because it’s George’s best song, but because I’m trying to think of the potential it had to be a timeless classic track if the Beatles had put their magic touch on it. But I don’t put “Beware of Darkness” in that wish list because I love it so much for what it already is (even though the Beatles probably would have made it a masterpiece too).
I'm with you on Isn't It A Pity. What the band could have done boggles the mind.
The day All Things Must Pass was released, I went with several friends to a girlfriends basement to listen to it. We all really liked it but I found that over time I've listened to it less than most other albums, Beatles or otherwise. One thing to consider Matt, the long outro to songs such as, Isn't A Pity, She's So Heavy from Abby Road and many other songs wasn't just a Phil Spector thing, it was popular back then as a way to enhance the experience of being stoned. As I've mentioned at other times, during that period, the music was made by freaks for freaks. The Beatles may have had a wider audience than most other groups but the production of George's songs shows that he was less concerned with appealing to mainstream culture, AM radio listeners, than he was in making music for those who were into the same things in which he was.
I've always had the impression that George's slide guitar style has been influential. Before "All Things Must Pass," slide guitar in general had been more bluesy, less melodic. Two examples off the top of the head of tracks where I hear his influence are America's "Sister Golden Hair" and Bruce Springsteen's "Man's Job."
I have a closer personal connection to Living in the Material World.
Its clearer and cleaner than ATMP. The song, LITMW, combines rock with Indian-flavoured inerludes, John, Paul and Ritchie..
It's the ultimate Harrisong.
And the slide work is sensational. I did a video on this song: th-cam.com/video/TTZQFubsuH0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=SB0Vl5mmM6q70q9l
George is my favorite Beatle, and I like more of his solo work than any of the others. The genres he focused on just gelled with me the best i think. But even if the album has problems, I still believe it is the best Beatles solo album. I just can’t compare it to anything the other three did. It really was George spreading his wings even if maybe the whole thing wasn’t stockpiled songs, and it’s beautiful. ❤
I've been a huge Beatles fan since I was a little kid, but it was not until I was an adult that I first listened to "All Things Must Pass" beyond the big singles, "My Sweet Lord" and "What is Life." Knew there was a lot of hype surrounding the album. It was a mixed experience listening to it at such a remove from when it came out. There are several very good tracks that I was not familiar with. But, as you point out, there is more than a little filler on the album. So your effort to recalibrate the scales of criticism for this album is well taken.
The story of "My Sweet Lord" is very interesting. Its resemblance to The Chiffons "He's So Fine" is unmistakeable. But there is a reason why Harrison might not have realized the connection, an area you didn't delve into. Harrison would later say that "Oh Happy Day" by the Edwin Hawkins Singers was his main inspiration. Listening today to "Oh Happy Day," which was a huge international hit in the late 60s, you can see why. The feel is very similar, though the melody is a little different. Harrison, of course, was repurposing gospel music from its Christian roots for more Hindu/ecumenical messaging. You can really hear the gospel roots of "My Sweet Lord" come through in the well done Billy Preston version that came out earlier in 1970 and on which Harrison played. (Preston's 1970 "Encouraging Words" album holds up very well and shows what the possibilities of Beatles compositions in the hands of someone who was a native soul musician). The Chiffons' 1975 cover of "My Sweet Lord" is pretty good too.
Finally, you were a bit rough on Harrison's slide guitar playing. You says that no guitar players emulate Harrison's style. I don't know that to be true, but even if true I am not sure you are drawing the right conclusions from that fact. Some people have a distinctive style that other musicians leave alone. They do so for a variety of reasons: it's hard to replicate well, or out of respect, or to do it themselves would seem derivative since it's so identified with a particular player. I'm thinking of B.B. King's distinctive lead guitar playing. I'm sure there are folks who try to closely mimic King's guitar playing, but I don't see it as widely copied, except perhaps in odd precincts of the guitar world.
For a critical appreciation of Harrison's slide playing, I would want to hear from some authoritative sources. To my ears, his playing can be a bit too syruppy, but sometimes it is just what the doctor ordered. (For instance, I really like his slide playing on "Handle With Care," his great Traveling Wilbury's song). My understanding is that Harrison's slide playing stands out because he was so immersed in the sitar and Indian musical composition. I do agree that it would have been nice for Harrison to keep working on his lead guitar chops post-Beatles. Instead, he generally left such stuff to Clapton and other gunslingers. That said, Harrison had to work hard to justify being The Beatles' lead guitarist, especially with the able Paul McCartney so close and so eager to set down his Hofner and give the guitar a try. Harrison's best lead work tended to be carefully worked out and undoubtedly was the product of prodigious effort on his part.
George's slide playing certainly improved over time, culminating with some great playing on Brainwashed. I hate his tone on All Things Must Pass and wish he would have used the tone and smoothness from his Day After Day solo.
Contrary to Matt, I much prefer his early slide playing because it was MORE bluesy e.g. th-cam.com/video/ZQ3o9I7zyhE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=OeSwsxC8Df0VzTRG
This album stands up today just as when it was released. Is it perfect? No but I still play it to this day. Can’t say that about any other solo project from the fabs. I accept the dogma of praise!
What serendipity. I just got an OG US box Set last week and I thought it sounds good. I'm already familiar with this album having listened to it via streaming. Owning this box set now, I can say this is one of those albums that one have to experience on vinyl. I agree with the 3rd disc but it's hard for me to cherry pick and whittle the album down to single disc ( a la White Album debates). Listening to the entire album all the way through, I had this impression that after 2 discs of serious, heavy themed songs, the 3rd disc is where the musicians let their hair down and have a party. Still not essential, though. The recent anniversary box set had more outtakes though, and I wondered if George spent a few more months working on a 3rd disc of proper songs how it will sound. If you're gonna go big, go big, right?
He certainly "went big!" Thanks for the comments, caavoom.
Great take overall. Handful of places I differ:
- I like the bubblegum sound of his slide playing because it’s juxtaposed with non-bubblegum music. The effect is to add charm.
- Flyte is a current Harrison-influenced band that sometimes emulates that slide sound - try “I’ve Got a Girl” (the slide part starts around 1:40).
- I think “Wah wah” is underrated. I dance around to it, and it’s on my exercise mix. The sound may be excessively cacophonous, but it makes the track feel like a party, so I would have wanted it pulled back only like 15%.
- I don’t understand the bit about the wall of sound not working well when there’s a band. A group of musicians was playing in both instances. Maybe a better way to put it is the sound of each instrument was much thinner in the early Spector days, so when the differentiation was reduced, there was a better effect than when each instrument already sounded thick on its own?
- I never fully understood the appeal of “Beware of Darkness.” I went back to it after this video and appreciated it a little more, but to me, the melody is meandering, and the arrangement (and George’s voice) are not dynamic enough to make up for it. (Plus, what’s a falling swinger?)
I have no problem calling it the best Beatles solo album just based on the songs alone. I hate the wall of sound too but All things must pass also doesn’t sound like it was recorded in his basement like John and Paul’s first albums and Beware of darkness is easily the best song of all 3. As far as My Sweet lord(which isn’t a favorite of mine because of the chanting) plagiarism goes I’ll go to my grave saying you can’t copyright a chord progression (if so Chuck berry should have been wealthier than Bezos) George by his own admission wasn’t a top tier lead guitarist (“What you guys need is an Eric Clapton”) But he was coming off of Abbey Road where his Lead guitar helped make that album(something is as great a solo as you’ll ever hear) And he did have Clapton and Frampton( kinda old and young guns there)He did kinda shoot his load with All Things but it was a heluva load lol.
Another great video Matt 👍
Thanks for the comments, DB. It was good that he had Frampton and Clapton on the record. It really elevated the playing. By the way, Lennon's response to “What you guys need is an Eric Clapton” was "What we need is a George Harrison."
@@popgoesthe60s52 Yes and John was right
A bold and timely take on this overrated "classic." Actually, I think it is generally good, and it would be my top solo Beatles release
as a two sided album. My Sweet Lord, Isn't It a Pity, Apple Scruffs, What Is Life, All Things Must Pass, and a couple others, are classics, and I strongly disagree with you about Harrison's very melodic, standard tuning slide guitar playing. Having said that, "bloated" is exactly the word that always comes to mind when I think of this album. The backing musicians are excellent, but Phil Spector, in my opinion, does not do any favors to Harrison with his production. It is dated by the standards of the time, and most importantly, today, it sounds muddy and overall, like crap. Perhaps I am biased, because I strongly dislike Spector's overblown production of several otherwise first rate Beatles songs (e.g., The Long and Winding Road, Across the Universe, etc.) as well.
Thank you Christopher!
I'm glad you mentioned "Hear Me Lord" because it's a gem not frequently discussed! I was hooked on it so much at a time that I was hearing it in my head being played even in my sleep!!! Too bad that its live "Bangladesh" version is still in the can! It would also fit the 74 tour perfectly, even sung with his raspy voice! But he did not include it, unfortunately. As for "All Things Must Pass", I cannot really count the different copies I have of it, definitely more than 10, including 5 different versions of the 50th anniversary releases! Thanks for the review...
Hi Matt - I didn't really take notice of "ATMP" until its re-issue in 2001 and was very pleasantly surprised at how good it was; I think I resisted it because it was a triple album and so beyond my pocket for many years, and the original LP looked very dour to me ! For me, this would have been an amazing double album. I never understood the reason behind including the Apple Jam tracks back in 1970 yet their inclusion on the double CD in 2001 seemed to be the perfect outtakes. The track that really stood out for me was "The Art Of Dying" although the best song on the album is "Beware Of Darkness" in my humble opinion. Cheers Tim
I wonder how much our childhood and early-life memories color our impressions of music we heard in those times. All Things Must Pass played a lot in our house through the 70s. I associate every song with something happy from childhood, so I can't hear the "overproduction" as anything but joyous. And that goes especially for Wah Wah, which would be in my top 3 song on the album. Is that the "happy memory" effect? Well, Red Rose Speedway and Venus & Mars were also on our turntable a lot, and I barely recall a note from those discs, while Band on the Run brings back the same feelings as All Things Must Pass. So, there must be something great about the music in the first place. I think you underrate this album quite a bit Matt. I'd be curious to know what was happening in your life when you first heard the album, and if that could have colored your opinion.
I noticed the same thing recently. I got into an online argument about a top 20 albums of all time and after I posted mine I went back and listened to a few from the 80s and 90s with an open mind and some just weren't as good as I remember, or as good as other albums by the same artist. We fall for the hype and praise at the time. Of course our musical tastes also drift over time.
Well Michael, I called this album the best or in the top 3 best solo albums, so I don't know why you wouldn't accept my praise. I also called out the strongest songs - of which I opined that Beware of Darkness is one of his great works. My has been idyllic and this album was never one I could listen to all the way through although it has some of the best work of his solo career.
@@popgoesthe60s52 Sorry, I really did enjoy hearing the praise you gave. I was probably overreacting to the second half of the video. Sometimes I just can't understand why anyone would dislike Wah Wah! :) I think it was in the 2000 reissue liner notes where Harrison said he wanted to remove Spector's reverb on the song before releasing it, and Clapton urged him not to. When it comes to the wall of sound on All Things, people's perceptions vary wildly. I think it's interesting why this might be.
What it really comes down to IMHO is the Songwriting. That is the forte of The Beatles legacy. The Songwriting on this is stunning. No clunkers for me. As an Atheist I should actually not like a fair amount of the lyrics. Although I do enjoy the occasional digs at Catholicism. Even so, this is a Songwriting bonanza. I also rate Harrison as one of the best and most creative Slide Players. Certainly the most melodic. His gift for Harmony on Slide and especially Vocals is second to very few. Art Of Dying is one of my favorites on the Album. The lyrics are so poignant.
Atheism is a religion.
For me thats the magic of (say) My Sweet Lord for example, even if youre not a religious or a spirtual person, that song has a strange effect or power that everytime I listen to it, no matter how many times I hear that song it always gets me (without wanting) singing along with the chorus and has me feeling good and kind of "sanctified" and uplifted (Same with Edwin Hawkins song Oh Happy Day)
18:32 That still with Spector and the blackberry brandy is hilarious
In a way, Dylan and Harrison did team up for an album -- two, in fact. There are other people on it as well, but it's definitely the two of them very much working together.
I still have my original copy-it has been my favorite solo Beatle album-thank you for your comments.
A testimony to the greatness of the songs on ATMP is that each song overcame the excesses of Spector’s wall of sound. Regarding the overall product, as a lead guitarist, I used to play Apple Jam as background to whatever I was doing. I loved it. My only disagreement with your take is Art of Dying. Bobby Whitlock said that it could’ve been Derek and the Dominoes…it was that good. Even more than the driving nature of this song are the words. I am not a reincarnation kind of guy, but if I were, this song could be an anthem for that belief system. The poetry and underlying meaning is simply amazing. If you’re not into Claptonesque stylings with reincarnation themes, I get your dismissive reaction. For me, the song is a masterpiece.
Yeah the brass arrangement is wicked too. I did the album live and Art Of Dying was a highlight, it rocks! Lots of words to try and remember but.th-cam.com/video/ormCakgOpRs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=w0VT_3_Sk16ccIsB
All Things Must Pass is a great and moving record. But RAM will always be my favourite Beatles solo record for its sheer inventiveness and unrestrained creativity - just like with McCartney, Paul seems to try anything and just have fun, and since he's a musical genius, it works out amazingly. Also, I find ATMP too preachy for my taste at some points.
At the time the album was so good. I think because we always got a track or two from George on Beatles albums. Sometimes those tracks were better or as good as any if the Lennon/McCartney songs on the particular record. So in general we always wondered what a solo record of George could be. When it came out is was very welcoming to the public. The songs were very strong, over produced yes but well written and thoughtful. Like you said 12 of the songs were really good. A single album less produced would have been epic. He was never going to be Page or Clapton or any of the other top guitarist of the day but his guitar was sweet, tasteful, minimum. His guitar was the Beatles sound so he never needs to apologize for that. To be one of 4 of the most famous and loved musicians on earth is pretty heady stuff. How they stayed as grounded and decent as human beings (though not perfect) still is amazing.
11:54 It was the 2000 remaster and the augmented demo of "Let It Down" that convinced me it was a beautiful song. As George said around that time "it's quite good, but it's very big. If I could, I would reduce the studio sound down a bit." The 2020 remix definitely helps the sound of the album version, of course.
The Beatles version is nice if incomplete.
That rendition of Let it Down with the bluesy added guitar and synthesizer is hand down my favorite version
@@prettyshinyspaghetti8332 At the time, it was nice to actually hear the lyrics. "Let It Down" wasn't the only song on the album that had this problem.
All Things Must Pass is one of those records that I've just about worn out, over decades of listening to it - so interesting and thought provoking to hear your review and perspectives! It makes me feel like I'm listening to a beloved album for the first time again, which is something magical
Thank you for the warm comment,
Jennie.
We were in the Army in Germany when this was released. Played it once; put it on a shelf, then put Led Zeppelin III(released the month before) on the turntable and cranked it up...All my buddies agreed: Much, much better. It didn't hurt that we were smoking the 'Best of the Becaa Valley' at the time...Frankly, it was a complete and utter slog through the album. The production and mix were horrible, even for the best stereo systems of the time and we had the high powered Sansui systems with huge bookshelf speakers bought from the base PX. Should have been a single LP.
I would put Ballad of Sir Frankie Crisp and I Dig Love in the top tier. I love Wah Wah but maybe in the second tier
Two things:
1. All Things Must Pass is as good as any Beatles solo album.
2. Harrison and Dylan DID do an album together. It was called Traveling Willburys (ok, I realize there were others involved as well…)
I had forgotten about the Wilburys!
I'm so pleased to find someone who shares most of my views about this album; I wasn't previously aware that anything less than uncritical adoration was allowed. Whilst I fully respect the opinions of its devotees, I don't understand the extreme levels of reverence it attracts. To be clear, there is some excellent music here but it is way over-produced and there is too much filler. My personal opinion is that it benefitted hugely from being first out of the traps post the Beatles' break-up. There, I said it.
This is a very fair review. I wonder if many of the original reviewers had bothered to listen to the whole album, because it runs out of steam by side 3 and was never a worth a triple disc. I love the songs, but it should've been a 10 track single disc, with some tracks held back for a new release in 71/72. The production makes some tracks feel dated (Art Of Dying) and others overblown (Wah Wah), while Isn't It A Pity should be shorter and just have one version. But there are so many gems, so it feels wrong to complain- the joy of Apple Scruffs, the hypnotic feel of Frankie Crisp, the spirituality of Beware of Darkness and the simplicity of Behind The Locked Door. The album reflects the mood of 1970, with uncertainty and some hopeful optimism for a new decade.
I couldn't agree more, Matt, that the album could have/would have been well served by a spare, Plastic Ono Band type approach. It would have let the songs, melodies, and above all, emotions, speak for themselves. Agree 100% about your valuing of the lyrics. Yes. Let the songs breathe, let us hear the lyrics. And the spaces between the lyrics.
I mean, truly, I'd have loved for this album to be adapted as a Beatles production, in the "Get Back" style. Room of course for George to shine and do what he wanted, yet with timely, apt, and tasteful contributions from the others.
And short of that, I'd have preferred a quieter, more intimate production. Something akin to the sound of "Long, Long, Long" (which is one of my favorite George songs, and one I think is tragically unsung).
Anyway, thanks as always your hard work and the conversation!
I appreciate the warm comment.
I think in the My Sweet Lord plagiarism case, people miss the Oh Happy Day component. George said he thought he was ripping off Oh Happy Day. It was in public domain. Only problem, Bright Songs had already ripped it off with He's So Fine, which they had the copyright for.
Wow. George really got a raw deal. It's one line. It's not as though after "he's so fine" they continued on with "mmm so fine."
@@benmeltzer I don't get your comment at all. Did you mean to reply to me? My comment is about both songs sounding like Oh Happy Day. The lyrics were never in question.
@@debjorgo I meant one musical line (not lyrics).
@@benmeltzer Even so, I never said George got a raw deal or My Sweet Lord didn't sound like He's So Fine. Oh Happy Day is certainly closer in theme to My Sweet Lord. I'm thinking when George was playing Oh Happy Day, he probably said at some point, "this sounds like He's So Fine". Phil Spector should had steered him away from sounding too much like it.
@@debjorgo I was agreeing with you and expanding further from what you said; not disagreeing with you.
The original box set also came with a roughly two by three foot poster of George. I remember when I first opened the box set when it first came out and saw the folded poster. The catch is, the roughly square foot section that I first saw was solid dark brown and I said oh, oh. I was hoping for some neato poster of George and so far, it was just solid dark brown. In the end, it was an ok poster but I was hoping for something better.
Yes I should have pulled out my poster. It has to be the most dreary give away poster ever!
He definitely looks a bit scary in that poster.
I have that too. You can tell by the folds that the bottom 1/3 is completely black. (Beware of Darkness)
I think the over the top production was exactly what that album needed. I also think it was the right decision to have those "filler" tracks and apple jams on there, because it adds to the larger than life vibe; this makes it unique in harrisons catalogue, which sometimes can be very dry, sparse and in its worst moments joyless; a stripped back ATMP would be a lot like "Living In The Material World", which is a great album as well (at least for me), but why should he have done the same thing twice in a row? A single-album ATMP would have been a stellar masterpiece of course, but the crazyness of that triple release is what makes it that mythical juggernaut amonst the beatle-solo albums, and is why many consider it the #1 solo-album, so also in hindsight right decision by Harrison (and Spector)
Anyway: great review as always!
Well put!
I think it's over produced. A lot of tracks are too busy, with too many layers and too many musicians on it. It's also the most un'-Beatle sounding of the solo albums.
The album is flawed. It does not need the third disc but every song on the album is worthy of note. My favorites are Let It Role, Behind That Locked Door, Run Of The Mill and What Is Life. The songs padded? Maybe but no song outstays its welcome. Wah Wah was written in January 1969 when he left the Get Back sessions for a few days. The Art Of Dying I believe is about Brian Epstein. I totally agree with you about Phil Spector's cluttered production. That is why this latest attempt to remix the album has caused some bad feeling in certain quarters. My Sweet Lord / He's So Fine. I can listen to both songs and enjoy them without thinking one is a rip off of the other. The end of the court case gave George the royalties for both songs in some territories and the owner of He's So Fine "Allen Klein?" in others. George's guitar playing. He let Eric Clapton do the lion's share of the lead guitar but George is no shirker and what hardly ever gets touched on is the wonderful work he was doing with artists like Doris Troy, Billy Preston and Jackie Lomax around this time. He had to handle the main guitar work in Living In The Material World because Eric Clapton was not around. Poor George supplied Apple Jam with the best of intentions. It was supposed to be a free disc for the fans but he did not think of the extra weight for freight and manufacture which ended up reflected in the price. The album is flawed but that I think is part of its charm. It is still George's masterpiece. Great review.
Thank you for the comments - much appreciated. What would have been great for the fans is do a double album and offer the second disc for free! 🙂
I have to say, you boldly go where even fools fear to tread. Even the most sincere reappraisal of a Beatles-related album can draw a lot of ire from the religious. Hiding within this bloated album is an excellent debut, but as a double album, it really drags. The wall-of-sound production begins to grow exhausting before the first disc is done. The two versions of "Isn't it a Pity" is one version too many. The second disc really bogs down in its own dreariness. Had Harrison taken the best songs and pared this down to a single disc, not only would it stand tall against many contemporaries, he also would have had some more material to pad out the very thin "Living in the Material World", which definitely needed *something* to pad it. As for "Apple Jam", jamming is one thing Harrison (and all the Beatles except maybe Ringo) just couldn't do. I will say that there's something about the epic size of this album that makes it feel greater than the sum of its parts, but in the end, it isn't enough to keep me awake to the end.
You state it better than I did! Yes, the second disc drags and the production is so stifling that I never listen to this all the way through. These negative type of reviews do 'offend' the most strident followers and I often lose subscriptions after reviews like this but the adulation has always been about supporting poor George after being kept down by Lennon-McCartney.
Edit: see the comment by victorarena23, whose I read right after yours.
"George already had a wall of sound. It's called 'musicians.'"
I one thing that you can’t deny is that all things must pass, is probably a better rounded album van in the of the other solo Beatles releases. That and the production may be be a bit over blown because of Phil Spector‘s production, but George does draw in a range of talent of talented musicians, including Clapton, which may have met an extra bit of oomph . Remembering that George Harrison then went on to form the travelling Wilburys that does point to his ability to bring out the best in musicians
Beatles freak here - born 1957: Quality was just about never the same once Lennon and McCartney were broke up (and no more George Martin). Exceptions are Imagine and Maybe I'm Amazed. Believe George H. has some masterpieces and other really good songs, but his "well" far below many besides John and Paul (EJ, Joel, Bruce, Zep, Sabbath, Richards / Jagger, even Alice Cooper Band and soo many more). None of post Beatles albums rivaled Beatle albums and best to me are: Band On Run/Venus and Mars. George masterpieces are: Gently Weeps and Here Comes The Sun, period. I actually think What Is Life is underrated. Lastly, seems perhaps his song writing should have improved, but was suppressed by two of the best ever. Always thought early, early promise and a much underrated song is Don't Bother Me - never hear any mention of it - never, but I love it - as John once said about All My Loving (another winner of many): "Its a darn good piece!"
Just for fun, here’s a single LP version
Side 1 - My Sweet Lord, Wah Wah, What Is Life, Behind That Locked Door, Let It Down, Run Of The Mill
Side 2 - Beware Of Darkness, Apple Scruffs, Ballad Of Sir Frankie Crisp, All Things Must Pass, Art Of Dying, Isn’t It A Pity
I love the wall of sound production on this album, especially on songs like Awaiting on you all. I'm an American, and I've always loved Spector's wall of sound
For me my favorite GH album is Dark Horse even though many said it was his nemesis. Love him for experimenting with jazz with Tom Scott.
I think there was an unwritten rule in the music business that you didn't sue over similar chords or lyrics, because everybody did that. Led Zeppelin's first album being an infamous example of musical plagiarism. The "My Sweet Lord" lawsuit could have set a precedent but didn't.
George and the lads worked over 60 hours in Abbey Road on single All Things Must Pass. P & J were helpful and encouraging. Clapton and his Dominos were fab on the triple album, then primed they did Derrick's masterpiece album the next year. Matt, George wasn't depressing... he was real. God I just adore Every song on this jewel.
Yeah, maybe there is some filler. But I completely love Wah Wah
I’d say if you condensed all things must past into a single album it would clearly be the best Beatles solo album but I still rank it as the best debatably. I like how it’s hard to choose the best Beatles solo album. The fact that there isn’t a clear winner really shows how much each member was bringing to the band as a whole.
It's hard to imagine disagreeing with you more about this album. The songs you thought were mediocre or "filler" were almost entirely great IMO. And I listen to Apple Jam all the time. "Out of the Blue" is one of my favorite tracks on the album. The only songs I kind of agree with you about are "Wah-Wah" and "It's Johnny's Birthday". It's a fantastic album IMO.
Also, George has most definitely been praised by other guitarists for his slide work.
Out of the Blue is one of my favorites as well. It develops so well.
@MichaelPhillips, I couldn't agree with you more in disagreeing with Matt about this album! I also love George's slide playing and have heard plenty of praise for it among my musician friends. To dismiss it because it didn't spawn a slew of copycats is a mindless view, IMO. Sometimes something is so unique and personal it's too obvious to copy. The one piece I would have done without is "It's Johnny's Birthday".
PS - why the heck did TH-cam add "Medicine" to my name??? That is new, I didn't do it!!
I dismissed it because I don't like it and I find his slide mediocre compared to the slide playing of Walsh, Taylor, Page, Frampton, etc. Copying and emulating a guitar technique is a show of liking it. To suggest my opinion is mindless is rather patronizing.
Wow Matt, heresy! I agree for the most part...However I love "most" of the album. I also consider his guitar work became weaker, including towards the end of the Beatles endeavors. As for ripping off music, ALL song composers are guilty to some degree, I admit it. We all have tunes, jingles, orchestral pieces that flit about the brain and influence "original" songs. Was it Zappa who said: 7 notes, 12 with accidentals nothing is completely original. Harrison got hosed on the "She's So Fine" decision. Thanks you're appreciated.
The Apple Jam disc is similar to the Rascals' "Music Music" disc from their 1969 album "Freedom Suite." It's basically a bunch of musicians jamming and going nowhere. If you want good jams, you have to start with great songs. Songs like "Whipping Post" or "Eyes Of The World." That said, I don't think there is much filler at all on the first two discs, and "Wah Wah" is among my favorite George songs ever. I like the overproduction.
Agreed. And that Rascals side I think also sucks. Self indulgent meandering.
As far as the production, they did a remix of the album in 2020 with the original reverb and production techniques stripped/minimized on many songs. I thought it was much better.
Great review, thanks, i really like all the songs on this album, I always felt Harrison should have released a single disc album with half of the songs, and gone back a year or so later and released a number of the others along with some other newer material, and would have gotten two really good albums.
My favourite solo Beatles album. A bit of filler here and there but the great songs out weigh the weaker ones. Great review here
Finally an accurate response not tainted by fanboyism.
There’s a great video in you ranking all of the Beatles solo work and then maybe a fan ranking after. I completely respect your critique of all things must pass and would love to see what you put over it. I have all things must pass at number one but I also think I’m in the minority of people who really enjoys what the wall of sound does on this album.
Another good idea for these type of videos is to make a “give your own review” post on your community page here and then go over some comments at the end of your review videos. Not trying to be too picky though, really love you vids and I could discuss Beatles all day.
A lot of George Harrison's solo work hasn't aged well, but All Things Must Pass, will always be one of the top solo works from former Beatles. It is a little bloated, but is a satisfying listening experience.
So, the album is a flawed masterpiece. When it came out in 1970 it captured the times. The Beatles had passed. The 60s had passed. Optimism for a quick end to the Viet Nam war had passed. In that context George's spirituality was refreshing.
But, your critical comments are accurate and well supported. A shorter, more focused album could have been even better.
In reference to your comment on Harrison's slide playing style, perhaps it is not emulated more often because the lines are almost always closely wedded to the melody of the song. e.g. the unforgettable riff on Badfinger's "Day After Day". George is not usually given to spontaneous improvisation. When it is done it sounds like Harrison. Think "Sister Golden Hair" by America.
Thanks getting me back into the album!
Good call on Sister Golden Hair. Thank you, Ken!
Huge Beatles fan, and I would say George was my favorite. That being said, I thought when it came out that it should have been one disk and maybe save a song or two for the next album. Same thought I had with the White Album.
I dunno,9/10 of white record was killer...
13:56 Apple Jam... yeah, I only really came to appreciate it when I got into superfluous 21st century post-rock space rock psychedelia (where 10 minute songs are the norm)... That is, I like a long jam for its nothing-burger tone it out and work on things quality. This really doesn't say much for the disc. I'll put it on if I'm on a road trip.
Considering all the lil gems he had that could've been developed into songs ("I Live For You," "Woman Don't You Cry For Me," "Rocking Chair In Hawaii," etc.), he could've lost a few on the main album and slid in a few there and kept it "George Harrison's New White Album" instead... I think there was just a bit of the bravado of "hey, I'm an ex-Beatle and Imma do a TRIPLE ALBUM nobody's done that before!!!" or, as you say, belief that everything he put to tape was good.
I only recently discovered Pop Goes The 60's. I have been enjoying it very much.
I thought this assessment of All Things Must Pass was quite refreshing.
I appreciate the feedback, and welcome to the channel! Plenty more to come.
26:37 Another thing to note, of course, is that outtakes from the ATMP period (and earlier Beatle-era tunes good and bad) kept appearing on his later albums. "Beautiful Girl" and "Woman Don't You Cry For Me" (the latter I didn't know until... you guessed it, the 2020 box set. I am impressed in George's ability to turn a bluegrass song into a mild disco number) to name a few... from the same album.
"Not Guilty," "Circles," and "Rocking Chair In Hawaii" are a few more I remember off the top of my head. He had a few more in demo form during that period too that he never put properly to record.
You've had some hot takes before, but putting "Art of Dying" "if Not For You and "Behind That Locked Door" in the filler section is reaching levels of hotness that scientists never thought possible.
Yeah those 3 songs are my favorites, especially Behind That Locked Door and If Not For You Love that Nashville Skyline type of sound, and Art of Dying interestingly has a pre-disco kind of sound.
No doubt the best solo effort from any of the fab four. Yes there were a couple of fillers and the production was a bit muddy in a couple of the numbers. But the best songs (you mentioned them all) are just sublime. Once again a great video. Thanks.
Excellent piece Matt. Isn’t it a pity version 2 is much better. It’s only 1/2 as long. Phil must have been sleeping one off that day!
If only we could get Phil off the rest.
Remember that "naked" Let It Be version of that album? Maybe there could be a naked All Things Must Pass. I'd stick to the original though. @@docsavage8640
First off for me personally ... I rate Lennon's ... 'Plastic Ono Band Band' as 'The' best post Beatles solo album ... simply harrowing, brutal, primal and simple ... Lennon at his finest and certainly could not have been made (I feel) within the constraints of the Beatles ...
Moving on ...
Matt ... this is another brutal analysis ... but I feel many people (me included) have thought it but have been unwilling to 'cut against the grain' regarding the overall critical consensus of 'All things must Pass' ...
I agree with your thoughts regarding the strong six, possibly seven songs on the album ... My Sweet Lord, What is Life?, All things Must Pass, Isn't it a Pity, Beware of Darkness are my pics ...
Your point about when some of those songs were written i.e. during the Beatles period is an excellent observation that I've overlooked.
I drank the 'cool aid' regarding The Beatles holding George's creativity back. Your comment about George feeling 'All things Must Pass' may have not received the 'production' it needed under The Beatles umbrella is a mind opener for me.
I'd argue that with input from George Martin, Paul, John and Ringo this would have been a fitting end to Abbey Road and The Beatles as a band.
Where you would list it on Abbey Road is another question.
George stated years ago that he gave one of his "best slide guitar solos" on Belinda Carlisle's 'Runaway Horses' solo album track 'Leave a light on' ... he never actually named the track but he only played 12 string & bass on 'Deep Deep Ocean.' so I'm going to make that assumption or George may have been 'taking the p*ss' ... 🤔
I was suffering PTSD following The Beatles break-up and overlooked some of the 'softer' tracks on the album and the questionable third disc 'jam' ... and to paraphrase you we (me included) just cheered George on ... maybe to get through our post Beatles fame ...
I must say that I listen to 'Plastic Ono Band', 'Ram' very frequently ... compared to 'All things must Pass' ... I still however get a great buzz when I hear 'My Sweet Lord', 'What is life?' and especially 'All things Must Pass' on classic radio ... George at his best despite Spector's sledge hammer production ...
As always ... love your work Matt 💕
I agree with everything you say, Matt, except your view that despite all its flaws it remains one of the Beatles' best solo albums. It would have been that if it had been released as a single album and had been produced in the way you suggest. Despite the production, there are enough gems to have made a superb single LP. 'My Sweet Lord' is simply wonderful, despite the plagiarism. I bought it when it came out and played it a lot at the time, but then hardly gave it a spin for fifty years.
The art of dying my favorite
Lennon (almost) got away with ripping off Berry's "You Can't Catch Me" As MaC said to him: "You know this (Get Back) sounds a lot like YCCM slowed down". Lennon was obliged to settle with Berry by recording and releasing YCCM, hence the R&R Album.
I am and have been a huge Beatles fan for 50+ years now but they did acknowledge that they'd appropriate or "borrow" good ideas left right and center.
Personal taste is just that; personal. ATMP would certainly be a wonderful album with a more stripped back production, I agree. ATMP is a wonderful album as is, it is the one we got. I fondly remember that summer when the album was recently released and My Sweet Lord was playing on the radio constantly. I was enthralled and thrilled. This was just about the biggest, best song I had ever heard! The sound was so big. Huge! Even the Jam sessions on the album are good fun,
I have no qualms reassessing Beatles and solo albums. Personally, and everyone is free to disagree - I think Sgt. P is overrated, and the medley on Abbey Road is a bit of a patchwork, although I love it to bits. Best solo George for me is the self titled album. So laid back and pleasant. Cloud 9 not so much; the production to my ears too much ELO. Just my personal opinions.
The thing with You Can't Catch Me is that is sounds nothing like Come Together. All Lennon needed to do was to change a word or two, but he was too brazen and paid for it. I also love the 1979 lp, possibly my fave album of his.
Fully agree. When I bought this on release, I couldn’t get into it like the mainstream. Every time I tried , I liked it at the beginning but started to get bored because the songs were completely drowned out by noise. Some songs which may have been good were overwhelmed by the cacophony. I believe a more bare production would have helped me to enjoy it.
I agree a naked version would have trumped Plastic Ono Band.
I just heard this album for the first time recently, and was blown away
Good, 'cause sometimes I wonder if the reason I love it so much is that I loved it so much back in the day.
Another interesting, enjoyable review, Matt! I rank this album pretty high as well (even with that 3rd disc).
It does feel though, with this album, that George was possibly trying to set himself apart from his former band (with production, length, playing style and number of musicians), in a grandiose way. The roster of talent assembled here is often wasted or lost in production, but the songs are still some of his best. I have to admit, I’m now curious of what you’ll be saying about “Dark Hoarse”😄
Hey Tom, thanks for weighing in. Some people think I'm a "George-basher". Wait til they hear what I have to say about Lennon and McCartney's solo stuff... not to mention Starkey's!
Looking forward to it! For me your fairness is one of the things I appreciate about your approach to your topics.@@popgoesthe60s52
Very accurate and good review, Matt. Over time, having known the album since it's release date, the "preachy" aspect of some of George's songs has worn thin on me, also a product of the time. Interestingly, in the past, like so many others, I would skip the "Apple Jam" disc, but in recent years having developed more of an interest in solo instrumental guitar artists, I've been giving it more of a serious listen. You didn't mention the 2020 remix which, in my opinion was a bad attempt to "modernize" and "de-Spector" the album. It merely pushed all the instrumentation to the background and pushed George's vocals out front.
No one was more "preachy" than John Lennon and lunatic "Oh No."
@@stephen8623 Really! Harrison was much more sedate in expressing his values.
It is so impressive to see someone from the next generation get The Beatles as well as you do. I would swear you are really about 67! We agree completely on this album. It is why I still put Ram as my favorite and this second. I can tell you that when this came out after the breakup, most of us were talking about how John and Paul had wasted his talent. But, after just a few listens it takes it's well-earned spot I think. Again...kudos to the production and mostly...your status as a true Beatle Phile!
I totally agree with you! We'll said
Hey Bill - thanks for the kind comment. 🙂
Another thing that occurs to me as I listen to this album again: "Isn't It A Pity Version 1" has another dig at McCartney. Toward the end of the very long fade out you hear definitely a choir going ♪Na na-na na-na-na-na na-na-na-na Innit a pity?♪ Which, of course, is a poke at "Hey Jude." Not to mention the guitar solos all throughout which are great but just lost in the mix because of how huge it is...