ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ค. 2024
- Any critiques, suggestions, or notes I'd love to read your comments.
Find Chase's podcast at prettyfort.com, or / @prettyfort
0:00 Introduction
2:53 Clean Test Start
3:39 SH-101
4:33 Bass Station Clean
5:33 Sub 37 Clean
6:31 Mother 32 Clean
7:44 Arp Odyssey Clean
9:07 Realistic MG-1 Clean
10:06 Clean Results
13:27 Drive Test Start
14:15 Bass Station Drive
15:33 MG-1 Drive
16:27 Arp Odyssey Drive
18:09 Mother 32 Drive
18:56 Sub 37 Drive
19:55 SH-101 Drive
20:38 Let's Make a Deal
22:43 The Final swap
22:55 Drive Results
25:40 Last Thoughts
27:29 Closure
Hope this is more interesting than just, "Jorb knows his own gear", I'm a bit worried that's the only point I've actually made.
Look forward to trying more like this, blindfolded tests.
I notice, only now after my final watch through, there is a bit of vibrato on the SH-101, minor mistake! I didn't notice during filming. - เพลง
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 69 | คู่เอก "กุหลาบดำ vs นาบิล"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PNM6U8e_HMo/mqdefault.jpg)
![กินอาหาร ถูก vs แพง!! จานละ 500,000 vs จานละ 50!! [Ver. 2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FF_HppKg4vs/mqdefault.jpg)
Dang, I seriously wanted to say "no, the Moog sound don't exist". But I hear it, I really hear it
My thoughts too!
It's amazing how you can hear in direct comparison, how the Sub 37's filter does not fully open (compared to the other filters), how amazing the Bass Station II sounds, how close the ARP filter is to the Moog filter, and how not-Moog the MG-1 filter sounds. Very eye-opening!
The tell on the Moogs is the volume dropping when resonance is added. Apart from that they all pretty much sounded the same to my ears.
I do think there's a "Moog" sound, but it isn't limited to Moog synths. I think it comes down to having fairly drifty VCO's (or DCO's with a good "slop" algorithm) and a transistor ladder filter, plus the ability to overdrive the filter. So other various clones like the SE-1X/3X, SE-02, Boog, some MFB synths etc. can achieve very similar sounds.
To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of the ladder filter. I think the bass drops off too much at high resonance, and the resonance sounds too much like a "detached" whistle/sine wave rather than being a part of the sound, unless you overdrive the filter to where it nearly breaks up.
From what I heard, in all cases here the Moog synths had the standard "moog filter" behavior in that when you increase the resonance, the low end drops out of the sound. None of the non-Moog synths in this video have this behavior to the degree that the Moogs do. Very fun video and I like that you had fun making it. Carry on! :)
Yes, it's all about the low end.
@ghost mall that transition between low and high frequencies is definitely the defining feature, i feel like you wouldn’t be able to tell most synths apart in a finished mix but i don’t think the moog filter sweep is very replicable barring just straight up cloning the circuit
Same for me. The Moog filters reduce the low end the more resonance kicks in. While it's nearly impossible to guess the moog without resonance, it becomes very easy the way you performed this test with rising resonance levels.
On a side note, I am a little disappointed about the Arp. The filter lacks resonance. Maybe it's the way you set it up, but I barely could hear any resonance.
I looked away before the Matrix came on the screen, and I got the same results... and I also guessed no. 1 was SH-101.
The Filter sweep gives it away every time.
I like a lot of different synths also. However let’s just be honest Moog has a definite sound and quality that many synths don’t have. And there are some synths like the ARP 2600 that are just as impressive
Impressive Jorb. Entertaining & informative. Loved the surprise on your face after the first round of blind testing.
Glad you enjoyed it! This was me really trying to thing of ideas that were good videos, and im still not sure if it turned out great.
Moog sound (to me, wearing DT 990s): 1. BIG fundamental when there is no resonance. If you played a note maybe 1 fifth lower, I think it would be easier to tell. 2. Softer harmonics at the top. That honestly was the clearest difference for me between the Arp and the Moog - Arp was beefy like Moog but crispier up top. 3. BIG but pure resonant peak on the filter resonance, giving it a very animated, distinct "quack." Loved this video and love blind tests in general!
i agree, for me the most distinctive feature for the moogs was that they just seemed to have higher resonance throughout.
Great stuff you channel deserves far more attention!
Cheers, thank you! Always growing, quite fast sometimes too!
This video is why I subscribed, well done! ❤👊🏾
🙏🙏🙏
I'm loving the channel and your content!
Thank you! Always more on the way
fun idea! definitely would like to see a non synthesist try it.
Cheers thank you! I most certainly planning doing that as a follow up, only downside is I have to wait before selling some of these moogs now. Lol!
@@JorbLovesGear Which of these did you sell and did you sell BS2?
@@LukezyM bs2 was borrowed, so it's gone. Mother 32, mg-1, mopho are gone now too, I rent the sub 37 out at backline sometimes so I keep it around
@@JorbLovesGear Sub 37 is really all that one would need for a mono synth. Too expensive for me though. I’m looking for a mono in realms of 300-400 bucks, with patch storage, so most of Behringer’s modules don’t cut it. Typhon is one option, it’s good because of fx and modulation, but scarce in osc engine. BS2 has all one would need and it’s cheap. I don’t really need an onboard fx too, so..
Oh it’s finally here!! Well done man! I would love to see “real” moog filter vs virtual analog. Seeing the sub37 vs say the Nord lead, a Korg Kross, a vst, and one of the new behringer clones would be super interesting. Now just to convince you to drop a lot of cash to make video exclusively to tickle my fancy haha. It is interesting to see that the ARP was the one that stumped you the most, which opens up a whole other synth can of worms! Great job like always brother!
There is definately a difference between virtual analog and the real thing. I have the Moog IOS app, which is good, but my Behringer Model D sound fatter, warmer, rounder.
@@lundsweden Yeah, my little B-Model-D steps up to the challenge every time. It sounds better than the Moog Rogue I've had. It's better in every single way except size. *moog gets a ding for using that shitty foam insert that melted into tar directly onto the mainboard.
Really digging your channel - good energy
Thank you!
In all honestly, I'm proud of putting that out
I would have liked to have seen a Boog Model D in there to see whether that would have shaken things up a bit.
I was actually surprised it wasn't in the lineup
it surely shook up things for me, for the price of a minimoog repair job minus work hours xD
I've got a Model D and it sounds great. I also have a K2
I was thinking the same thing.
Having had both, they are the same sound wildly. One is obviously much cooler to have and show your friends though
I think it's everything rapped in one product the sound, build quality, the signal path.. if you take one out of the equation.. you lose that sound .. I just purchased a matriarch and I'm really blown away at just everything .. I know I paid alot but I also feel it won't break in a year or even 20
This was really fun. I've been looking for a video like this. I'm surprised there aren't many! I love that the Moogs not only sound different from the others, they also sound different from each other. These really aren't mere machines; they are musical instruments. ♥️🙂👍
I have no idea why, but I was on the edge of my seat for this video like the way regular people are for major sporting events. There was definitely physical and emotional tension in my soul the whole time. This definitely says more about me than the video. lol
😅🙏🙏
Aaand I think my ears graduated😂
This was fun to watch. I don't even own any of those synths. But it's nice to listen to them. Plus the interaction between you too is great.
Much appreciated! I'll let Chase know he's got another fan, he'll really appreciate that lmao
Damn, nearly perfect suggestions. I am impressed and I could hear a difference. I'd like a Boog in there like someone mentioned before. This would be crazy. Nice Channel Jorb, love it!!!
Cheers thank you.
And welcome! I've got lots to say 😂
Great Experimentation! 🙂I'm quickly becoming a fan of your channel. I came for test but was completely entertained by watching you squirm. Lol, lots of fun.
Welcome aboard!
I have a Moog Sirin and it's very close to a Moog The Source, it's the only one I have heard in decades that has that 'vintage' sound. Nice upload, a lot of fun and an excellent score.
I've taken up synths as a hobby a little over a year ago and I couldn't tell you which was which. Lol.
Good job dude. This is the first video I've watched of yours (Gabe Miller told me to come check you out and I do everything I'm told, so...) and I am pretty impressed. Definitely subscribing.
Ahh cheers to gabe, welcome aboard.
The giveaway was the bottom end dropping out of the Moogs.
Yeah, the lack of bass was really noticeable on the Moog synths when the resonance was turned up. Without resonance though, it'd be very difficult to tell which was which.
Been following you for some years, I can’t believe I missed this until now , new favorite… co-pilot is great too.
Everyone opines that the Moog sound is mostly the filter but rarely do people mention the mixer gain. That’s where a lot of the smooshy overdriven suppressed mids magic happens. All of that distortion that then makes the filter sound so powerful.
Just found your channel randomly in my feed. YT algorithm comes through in good way. I’m a drummer but really love synths,sequencers ,drum machines . I have multiple Edrum kits , and enjoy being able to link up lots of different gear via midi and see what creations can be made.
ahh cheers, welcome!
I've been meaning to cover drum machines in some way, but dont find myself using them much, im big into sampled drums
@@JorbLovesGear understandable, sampled drums are great as well. I like the Roland TR-8s b/c you can use sample drums with it along with classic 808/909 with multiple individual tigger outs, audio in for using internal EFX and good sequencer, not beatstep pro sequencer lvl but good. Looking to add keystep pro and moog minituar to my setup in next few months. Got a chance to play that Moog model a few weeks ago and I was absolutely blown away how good it was. The bass tones were so fat!!!! When a piece of hardware gives to the” bass face”(the look of smelling dookie) immediately you know that’s an item you need in your tool belt. Keystep Pro you already know.
Compromise in the lows with increased resonance on a Moog ladder filter is a noticeable thing, IMO.
Great job! To me the Moog filter has more worble when sweeping at higher resonance than the other filters that you can hear even over crappy phone speakers.
Cheers! That's the true test, if it sounds good through the phone, it must be good 😂
Okay, so Marc Doty/Automatic Gainsay did a similar thing in attempt to demonstrate that there is a “Moog sound”, except it was the viewers that had to guess blind which synths were the Moog… BUT it totally blew up in his face, because the overwhelming results in the poll were completely wrong, even from experienced viewers. 😂
Great video!
Thanks!
That was so cool! I heard the difference!
The Peavey DPM4 was the first soft-synth in a hardware keyboard workstation and had the Modular or Mini Moog waveforms especially the saw and the filter as well, to create polyphonic textures, and that unleashed the vintage and analog retro-wave, when Alice Cooper hired Derek Sherinian in 1990 who showcased the DPM3
That's a thing to start with! Really rad.
I think I would be able to do this if it was all an octave down. That's pretty much where I play Moogs.
MG1 was my second monosynth and my first 'real' one (Had the CS01 before but that's not in the same league). I've used Moog's most of my life and had never done an AB comparison. I could clearly hear the Moog's versus the others (I listened to the vid not watched). I have a Behringer Model D and it does actually sound like a moog, though I've never played a real minimoog. I've occasionally tweaked the wrong filter when running the Model D and Slim Phatty side by side
Impressive! Nice video. To me the "tell" on the overdriven set is there are strange resonant peaks during the filter sweeps in the non-moogs that shouldn't be there.
You should have played the same synth twice in a row. To see if Jorb could tell the difference, trick question😂
😂Honestly would've been a good little trick.
Dude, thats some hard shit. As if you nailed it in only the second iteration!!!! Good job. The juno thing, i reckon is too obvious, because of that chorus, but, is it? You are a good presenter, good content, relaxing approach. Very, dare i say, human. Thanks bro.
Cheers, thank you!
I agree, the juno might be too unique for a test like this. I'd love to think of a good way to include it though!
Jorb A loose idea but compare a few chorus pedals on different synths against the juno???
The SH-101 had a very noticeable vibrato and also the operator moved the ones with faders faster than the ones with knobs. But still, excellent job! 👍
That's seriously impressive
Also, there's something really good about that bass station 2 filter
Cheers thank you! Bass station 2 really does kick ass.
The "moog sound" isn't unique anymore. I think a lot of it is the filters, but it's associated with Moog because they sounded like that early on.
It's like that gibson thickness and fender brightness. None of those are unique to anything at all, but they are historically the source of it.
Hey Jorb - Another interesting vid! My take-away is that IF there is a Moog sound, it's very subtle. Put one in a mix and I wonder if you'd still be able to tell. But boy, you got good ears 😀
lol, thank you! Yeah, i cant believe i did how i did.
Also, that was adorable
Faster sweep on non moogs. Pot vs fader/user vs user. I love your content.
when doing filter sweeps, moog characteristically has a low end drop.. so if you know what to listen to, its doable..however i've never done it myself , and really im quite sure that i would miserably fail if i did, props to you, you've probably spent quite a bit a time behind those symths and in the end i think thats whats important..beyomd brands and such.. anyway cheers to you and your buddy who's mildly effing with you.. making this entertaining...
i was at guitar center with a buddy of mine, he had about $800 to burn and wanted a synth. We messed with all the roland botique's and they all sounded great, then he played 1 note on the mother 32 and it like rattled the walls. It was plugged into the same system all the botiques were plugged into, but it just made this magic sound that instantly had him hooked and he walked right out with the moog!
They do kinda do that lol, shake the room
@@JorbLovesGear well...I just ordered my Subsequent 25 and I expect it to shake more than the walls....I have this rotten tooth I need knocked loose and the synth was cheaper used than the surgery.
of course it is. but the Crave may be the best moog-related (or unrelated) synth ive ever heard. love the sub 37 sound too, but never played one, only the subsequent 25.
id be interested in if the "roland sound" is real
You made it a _lot_ harder on yourself with the Odyssey set to Filter I, not II or III!
2300* subscribers, congrats man!
Thank you! Always accelerating.
In my first band, the guy who would eventually be best man at my wedding played keys, and his first synth was a Moog Source. To this day, the sound is very familiar to me. It's just a Moog thing.
Sounds like a winner. Would love to try a moog source!
The only one I would have guessed up front was the SH-101. Not necessarily because of the sound, but because the short throw of those sliders made him sweep the filter much faster than with the knobs on most of the others. Watching the video and knowing which one was the arp, it was apparent that the filter curve on it was different than the other three. I think that Jorb was listening for some other aspect of the sound, but when knowing beforehand the difference was quite apparent.
The arp is easy to identify at full resonance - it does not go as high as the others
I'd really like to hear a Behringer and a VST in here as well if possible. Now that we've confirmed the filter has mojo, is that mojo transferable?
Me too! It sort of becomes a different question, when that many differences are in play, but I do agree that it's worth a check.
The Moog filter sweep always sounds creamier. Period
It's that latter filter man
What a good little experiment. I won!
That resonance.
The primary variable(s) is the listener's ability to identify specific sound related parameters (hearing resolution). Some people cant tell the difference between much at all, but dont actually know they have limited hearing ability.
Well, ARP did put in R&D time to ape the Moog ladder after they were bonked in a lawsuit for copying it.
I have terrible hearing, wearing hearing aids but do own 1 moog synth. The first test was difficult but overdriven I could guess each one. So i think there is definately a moog sound, it’s subtle but it does exist
"And to think, all we had to do was stage it" I GUFFAWED
lmao that was a good one
It'd be fun to have viewers send WAVs of different but similarly moogy sounding synths to make it even more challenging.
I wouldn’t say that Moog synths sound necessarily superior to other brands sound wise but we can’t deny that they have a distinctive sound and it’s apparent in the lower range of the high resonance sweeps.
I agree, they sound good, but not superior
My main takeaway: they all sound great in their own right.
It's also easier to tell on short attacks and short to medium decay times. The moog filter has a ton of punch.
I should say also onthe filter envelope
All the moogs sound like there is a filter always on for everything over 15-16khz. The others sound brighter/ harsher on all tests to my ears
I kinda wanted to be like "nah that's probably not even a thing" but I agree yep, it sure is lol
I'd love to see you do the model d to see how close they got!
😂 Same honestly. I would have loved for it to be inconclusive, but here we are. Lol
"Synth Daddy" lol love the channel
Also *HUGE HIGH FIVE 6/6 FOR BIG SYNTH DADDY JORB* ... Dude of course you're gonna hear a difference. Sometimes in life you actually get what you pay for. This is why we buy Moog. It's butter, Baby!
Something about the way the low end shifts when you work the filter on the Moogs.
That seems to be the consensus! I should do it with a visible EQ, would be interesting to see.
@@JorbLovesGear Oh yeah that'd be cool! Curious to see how it'd show up visually!
Funny enough, what kind of helped me know what to look for was the various filter options on the Korg Electribe 2. It has a toggle for MG, OB, Prophet, and MS20 type filters and I almost always reach for the Moog-style one for basslines.
Wound up referencing that with some of the Arturia stuff, and while much higher quality, still kind of brings those differences to the fore. Maybe you could check the Electribe 2 out at some point if you haven't yet!
@@terminalglimmer I would ~love~ to try an electribe. I'm haven't had a ton of groove boxes, and I'm really into bang for your buck, and stuff that has been sort of glossed over.
It's a perfect candidate!
My fave filter has got to be the doepfer wasp! 😆🐝
Obviously it' s important to follow along without watching, but I will definitely admit that the Moog synths have a particular quality. It seems like the waves themselves and the filter sweeps are smoother; more rounded if you will.
However, whether that' s your cup of tea is a different matter entirely.
One could also say that the extra smoothness is lack of aggressiveness. It just depends on the style of music that you make.
If I were aiming for a flute, brass or clarinet, I would definitely consider one of the Moog, even if its just an "entry level" model.
For strings and more aggressive patches, I would probably go for the Arp. It has some of the smoothness of the Moogs, but retains more of an edge.
For electro and industrial music, I would probably go with the SH101, because for me it has a more robotic and hard edge feeling.
However, a memorable hook and original unexpected breaks are still more important than the brand of the synthesizer that you use.
Some of the VST synths and replicas come so close that somebody who is not a synth freak is not going to notice the difference, simply because they don' t care.
Cool video! There are two design features that might be part of "the Moog sound.":
1) They don't make a pure square wave. I think that's true of every Moog ever made. If you take an Arturia synth and dial up a pure square you get one. It's that thin, hollow sound. You can't make that on a Moog. If you take the Arturia and add in a bit of saw then you'll get the same wave as the Moog square.
2) Starting with Voyager, the filter knob doesn't open the filter all the way. I'm not sure if every modern Moog is that way, but I know the Sub 37 is and I think the GM and Matriarch are too, based on other's comments. I haven't tested the small semi-modulars. Unfortunately I can't hear past about 12k anymore so I can only figure it out through testing ;-) This probably matters most when you're driving the filter into distortion.
Is the imprecise square wave not just when the mixers are driven?
Or are you suggesting there's always some drive in the signal path, or that the squares are derived in some particular way?
@@JorbLovesGear I'm sure it's a design choice. My assumption is that Moog just doesn't want their synths to have the ability to make that thin, reedy sound you get from a pure square. All phat all the time ;-) The Model D, the Voyager, and every Moog made since is that way (well--I'm not sure about the Moog One).
On a scope, the Sub 37 square has vertical sides, but slanted top and bottom (slanted opposite the saw). Driving the filter rounds off the front corner (giving it a smoother sound). Adding multi-drive sharpens it again. You would think that somewhere between saw and this square/ramp hybrid wave that it would become an actual square, but it doesn't. There's a point where the top is flat, but the bottom is sharply angled at that point. At the square setting the top and bottom are angled the same amount. Going past there into pulse narrows the gap, but it doesn't change the slope until you get to the extreme setting where the bottom becomes flat but the top becomes a sort of fin shape.
Voyager has pretty much the same shape square, but a steeper slope (it's buzzier). While Sub 37 has a nicely formed triangle, Voyager has a humped shape. The path from triangle to square is very different on Voyager. In my opinion, the 37 is more interesting (sonically) in that regard. Mother 32 has a square that is identical to Voyager. Interestingly, if you turn the filter all the way down on the Voyager square you get a close approximation of a sine.
Great video. I wish you had a Sequential Pro 3 or Roland Jupiter X or Fantom which all have ladder filters. I really can’t pull the trigger on a Moog because I have both.
Thank you!
Yeah I've been really really tempted by the Pro 3 lately, what a monster. Maybe once I sell all these moogs!
@@JorbLovesGear the Pro 3 has two different settings on the ladder filter, one that acts like a Moog and the resonance drops the low end, and one where the low end doesn’t drop. It’s a beast of a mono synth (technically a tri-paraphonic? Synth🤣)
Jorb you're a beast!
😂🙏
Synth Daddy!
People trying to attribute the sound to this or that component. It's the entire package, just like any other instrument.
Really fun showcase, but if you ever plan on doing something like that again, have one more synth than there are 'guess slots', so you can't just go by process of elimination.
6 guesses? have seven synths.
So you could end up with 3 moogs vs 3 others, or 2 moogs vs 4 others, etc.
Interesting vid. I could hear on the Moogs how the bass dropped out when resonance was added. Which filter version did you use on the Karp?
Circuit 1! Which I believe is 12db, not the moog clone.
Which, in hindsight, should've really double checked. Lol.
They all sound good, but the Moogs sound otherworldly--a gentle alien mothership, if you will. That is the Moog sound. Just realized.
All the ladies be like, "Spank me, synth daddy." Good job, There's a definite difference. Arp was hard because they tried to come close as they could after copying Moog on the early 2600s and getting sued. I really liked the SH-101.
Now do a follow up looking at the waveforms on an oscilloscope for the data behind the Moog Sound
Would love to do it looking at a proper eq, see if i could really identify it
the moog app sounds pretty moogy if you ever wanna revisit this test, could be funne
I have a Moog and I know exactly where the money was spent. spend time with them and nothing sounds like a Moog. some close contenders though. good vid
🙏Cheers thanks!
Its true, they do make it clear that they're premium
I think they’re easy to pick at the highest reso settings. 🤷🏻♂️
the bottom end drops out on the moogs when you crank the resonance. They get really quiet. It's a dead giveaway.
Have one sample unit for Chase with a bunch of farm animals or at least a cow and do filter sweeps for him to guess. 👍
Yes.
yes
I was listening along without watching and guessed exactly as you did. So if you were wrong, that would’ve been really interesting. There’s just a certain way a Moog sounds. Even when the Moogs don’t sound exactly alike, you can hear the personality. Automaticgainsay did a similar blind comparison I got wrong. What synth fooled me? It was an Arturia… Matrix Brute I think. But these other synths you’re comparing to all have their own sound. Funny. I was sure the sh-101 in this comparison was the ARP. What do I know?
It would be interesting if there was a Behringer Poly D or Model D among the 6.
I think that would muddy the waters a bit, becomes a separate conversation I think, if they can match the sounds, and that wasnt my goal.
@@JorbLovesGear Perfectly understood. Thanks for your reply.
I have done this with my Moog's, could even tell what Moog it is.
On all moogs the bottom drops out when you add resonance
Doesn't the KArp Odyssey have multiple filters? Which were you using? Loved the video regardless!
It does! I totally forgot to change it to the moog clone filter, which i think is 2? But mine was on circuit 1, which I think is 12db/octave.
@@JorbLovesGear Not sure which setting is which... I do have an Odyssey 2810 with the #4035 Moog filter clone and the bottom drops out with resonance just like an actual Moog. In your video though, I don't blame you for getting tripped up on the Korg Odyssey, it definitely sounded closest to the actual Moogs.
I also have a 2810 odyssey with the 4075 filter and can confirm that increasing resonance causes massive drops in bass frequencies, but I also have a Micromoog and the filter on that sounds absolutely nothing like the one in the Odyssey. Interesting, eh?
@@kgbinfo Indeed. Bass drop out with resonance is not unique to only Moog, but it's definitely a characteristic of a Moog filter. I have a Multimoog, so same filter as your micro and there's a known fault with those. They lack bass even without resonance. There's a mod available. Regardless, I agree... synths & their sounds + user perspectives is always an interesting topic ;)
@@SacSynths_Jack_Z interesting that you brought up the "lacking bass issue" in the Micromoog. I've always wondered what people were on about. My Micro has plenty of low end; at least as much as my Odyssey. I wonder if it had the mod done on it by a previous owner. Either that or the whole thing is a myth!
Envelope curve has a lot to do with the Moog sound as well
Shame about the vibrato on the SH101, dead giveaway! Not a criticism, these things happen.
FWIW I somehow correctly identified each synth by name in the overdrive test. First doesn't count because I saw the list briefly. There are a handful of particular tells on each synth. Knobs vs sliders, brightness, amount of passband gain loss with resonance, etc.
I was also surprised just how much I liked the sound of the Sub37 in comparison to the others, when I'm not a Moog fan. Dammit. I can't afford that!
It is a shame, I sincerely didn't notice until editing, but, what can you do.
And I agree, the sub 37 really does sound excellent.
Regardless, I still plan to sell it, hard for me to justify the 1000$+ price
I did the blind test, and I guessed all of them, just had doubt in synth nr. 3 in the cleans. The overdriven odyssey was the most obvious to me, how did you get that wrong? :P
Guess I have bad ears!
@@JorbLovesGear definitely not, you did a great job, sorry if I forgot to mention that
Interesting to see you missed the ARP, as in my mind the Moog Grandmother is sort of like if the ARP2600 and Minimoog had a child.
best moog sound is not because it is something nonreplicable, but as friend of mine said, "its all sweetspot". It is difficult to put these machines in bad setup. So it's not about sound but interface imho.
edit after whole video: I wonder were you wrong if you'd hear bonus round with full resonance up. All the correct answers looked like you realised the answered with blown up resonance.
Wow.
🙏
Err... that's just listening for the moog filter type. What would be interesting would be to try it with moog vs moog clones (analog and virtual analog/VST)