The fact that the spartan pikemen beat the thorax pikemen and the hellenic royal guard ( which is considered to be the best pike unit in the game), is just ridiculous.
In Rome 2 if two pike units are charging, the first one to make contact will win the fight, of course the quality of a unit will have an effect on the battle, but the spartan pikes are on the same level of quality of the thorax pikes.
@@mattiaproserpio1453 they came into the Spartan Army with the reforms of King Cleomenes III which in what I remember is to keep up with its neighbors especially Macedonia
this video made me realize how flaccid a charge into a pike wall looks. they should've animated in a way that some people get through into the middle of the wall and die in a unique animation that occurs when you charge pikes
@@borbarad2.0 It's not strange at all. You won't find many horses out there that will willingly impale themselves. Them stopping short is something that actually happened. Whether or not the devs intention was to simulate this is a different topic though, and I don't think they did. The collision physics of this game are wonky to this day which is why even the ones in the back stopped.
I love elephants and its a nightmare to image humans dragging them into our fights... but if I have ever seen anything more badass that a war elephant I forgot about it lol
@Red Eye Orb not really... He won a decisive battle at the Hydaspes river against an opponent who fielded many war elephants, those were definitely not what stopped Alexander’s expansion. Given time, he would surely have cooked up a counter strategy to deal with these new, unfamiliar beasts in a more effective manner. No, it was the morale of his men that checked his expansion; so far away from home, for so long, they refused to go any further. Perhaps diseases played a part as well. Point is, it definitely wasn’t the elephants.
Not only that I remember in rome 1 that even when the chariots kill themselves against the phallanx they still break the phallanx so you can throw more bodies to the breach before they form again... Rome 2 is very beautiful and all of that but it's really ridiculous.
Even levy pikes can beat most other non pike units when faced head on. In campaign, I beat the campaign as Epirus on legendary difficulty using levy pike as my mainline infantry. They are great even against the higer tier non pike infantries. And if you lose them, you don't really care because they are so freaking cheap to replace.
Honestly you aren’t that far off, a lot of pike fights happened at this distance, but what isn’t represented are the brave lads who would crawl BENEATH the engaged pikes to slash at each other with swords, or even move up and scythe the ankles of the opponent. This fighting was done on their knees or crouched.
Just finished a Macedonian campaign. Took me a while to realise while defending a city against a full stack, if i fight the battle manually and use the garrison pikemen to block the walk exit at the bottom, i can inflict huge casualties and even take the W sometimes (if they don't have enough infantry and the AI funnels them all to the same place). Cheesy but satisfying 😌
in troy u send in your hero to blob up the enemy for 5 mins while your archers shoot the blob and the enemy runs. there wont be any pikes or chariots cuz they arent needed with this 1 hero unkillable for 5 mins
15:14 - Imagine being the first poor bastards to charge headlong into pikes, lmao. I also love how they just flop, barely with any animation and even crash into a few of the pikemen.
Actually there's a chance for a rider to survive even when a mount died. I remember playing Rome where one guy in my elepant unit walk since his mount died. I also seen this in Shogun 2 one of my katana cav unit has that one guy that walk.. Don't know if this is a bug tho.
Chariots, cavalry, light infantry, spear-throwing infantry and elephants have their chances of giving more damage, taking less damage for a certain amount of time, and in some cases even win with a better tactic than just suicidal frontal attack. Flanking, outmaneuvering, throwing spears, shooting, hit-and-run (combined with flanking). All of this can make the pike phalanx wish to be somewhere else. That's the whole point of the Total War series: to actually use units in the best possible way and not just leaving them kill themselves over the enemy's blade.
The elephants really surprised me, in Rome 1 they would all die instantly charging a phalanx so I never even tried in Rome 2, it's interesting to know that's actually a viable option if flanking isn't possible.
Possibly the scythed chariots only true weakness. But only a moron would direct charge into a wall of pikes with it. But bravo elephants for being the true pike destroyer!!!
The physics of the war engine still bothers me 😪 the ranks look like a a block of gel bouncing against the pikes. Which was less so the case in 2004 I just can't unsee it
@@squidward9826 I'm talking about the engine specifically. While the graphics and animations are much more refined, unit collision and how they engage eachother is just painful to watch. In Rome 1, as the unit is about to charge, the first rank speeds up, and the ranks behind slow down when the first line is engaged already. They don't all simultaneously run at the exact same speed, and then collide into eachother. I don't know if you've played much Rome 1 back in the day, but the way units behave in Rome 2 really feels off, despite Rome 1 being far from perfection, although it was a masterpiece for its time ofcourse.
Why wouldn’t they have? There are several lines of pikes at varying distances. Even if you got past one line, which is difficult enough in its own regard, you’d still have a second line, and a third line, and potentially a forth line of sharp pikes that you’d have to bypass before ever even being close enough to effectively engage. Also, I don’t think Alexander the Great would’ve used pikemen as his frontline if they couldn’t stop an infantry charge, especially at battles like Guagamela.
@@steliosfras7313 it’s interesting that you use these examples. For starters, at the battle of Thermopylae, there were also 6,000 Greek allies, in addition to the 300 Spartans that guarded the pass, against a force of 80,000 Persians, not 20,000. In addition, the Greeks didn’t use pikes, but rather their (comparatively) shorter spears and swords in the hoplite phalanx formation. Granted, that is a nitpick, but still important to mention. In regards to the Battle of Marathon, the Greeks took positions in marshy and mountainous terrain, which, had they been using a pike phalanx style would have been just about the worst position they could have been in, and soundly defeated the mostly ranged Persians through flanking actions. The Athenians’ strategy was to consolidate the best of the landed Persian warriors in the center, in that bad terrain, and proceed to surround and slaughter them. Information on both of these topics was just a quick google search, if you’d like to try and disprove me
As someone who has played the original Rome total war game countless times I can say with confidence that the Spartan hoplites are by far the best phalanx unit if not the best infantry unit in the game... Excellent moral incredibly good armour and skill defence...not even attacking them from behind with a heavy cavarly charge affects their moral all that much only way to beat them is to either overwhelm them with powerful hand to hand fighting units until their phalanx formation is broken or kill the most of them with deadly ranged units...
Elephants are not suicidal and would not charge into a wall of pointy spears. Like chariots, the phalanx would purposely open up slightly setting a trap on 3 sides and the elephant would be speared until disabled. Likely before many elephants would even be fatally wounded they would be so pissed off getting poked they’d be bolting out of there. They were very rarely used for charging. Historically their main use was as elevated mobile missile platforms with 1-3 which archers. Elephants are smart creatures, not stupid like horses that will blindly charge a wall of spears. Phalanx would overcome these units armed with too few actual men as soon as they got too close
also we are getting more and more info about the usefullness of it, for example there are text that describe that f.ex one roman centuri would form a testudo and make a ramp to cross ditches or climb embankments, its blooody genius
its not fair you must let the unites which have missiles use their missile capabilities ... move back and shoot everything before they charge. its like you are micro managing the Spartans but just leading the Egyptian to their death
It's all bull shit. Yesterday I created battle much better than this foolish attacks. Selevkids versus egiptians. Pikes versus pikes, cataphracts versus camel archers, archers versus archers. Moreover, there was a sea battle. 6 large ships versus 6 large ships. Only two of Egyptians ships won the battle, but the were on fire and didn't make it to the land. About 770 Egyptians versus 720 seleukids. About 100 Egyptians left, but I won. That was the battle... sorry for mistakes, I am foreigner.
Great video. The physics of the units charging looks terrible though in comparison to RTW units. Still playing Roma Surrectum and I cannot see the improvement?
TW AI is pretty limited and well, stupid. You can pit praetorian guard vs shield bearer and SB will win all the time. While in real history, the Romans wrecked the Greeks so hard.
в реальности же ни кто не будет прыгать на пики а просто обойдет их и будет рубить саблей с боку и с тыла и проскочит про скользит под пиками или схватит руками эти пики и отберёт!
A well ordered phalanx, from the front, can only be defeated by a better phalanx. Even heavy infantry can at best hold the line. But if attacked from behind or flanked, disrupted by terrain or chariot/elephant or heavy cav charge? They fall very quickly.
EVERY EGYPTIAN UNIT CHARGING a PHALANX WAL timestamp
00:00 Egyptian Infantry
00:48 Egyptian Slingers
01:21 Egyptian Archers
01:45 Egyptian Javelinmen
02:11 Skirmisher Cavalry
02:43 Nubian Spearmen
03:23 Levy Thureos Spears
04:00 Karian Axemen
04:33 Camel Spearmen
04:57 Egyptian Pikemen
05:19 Light Cavalry
05:56 Camel Archers
06:22 Galatian Swordsmen
06:54 Citizen Cavalary
07:29 Tarantine Cavalry
07:55 Thureos Spears
09:09 Egyptian Cavalry
09:46 Pikemen
10:34 Thorax Swordsmen
11:27 Thorax Pikemen
12:32 Hellenic Royal Guard
13:51 Royal Thorax Swordsmen
15:08 Ptolemaic Cavalry
16:07 Galatian Royal Guard
17:40 Scythed Chariots
18:04 African Elephants
20:48 African War Elephants
Thanks for making this it made it way easier to find the battles I wanted to see
Don't ruin the god hood of the likes please on the plus side nice
1988 ROME JULES REMI GOFFLO CÉSAR MARC ANTOINE ROMAN
When pikemen and pikemen collide
"Lay down your arms!!"
"No, you lay yours down first!'
The fact that the spartan pikemen beat the thorax pikemen and the hellenic royal guard ( which is considered to be the best pike unit in the game), is just ridiculous.
I think spartan pike can beat thorax pike with not much trouble
@@nqm4995 spartan pike never existed
In Rome 2 if two pike units are charging, the first one to make contact will win the fight, of course the quality of a unit will have an effect on the battle, but the spartan pikes are on the same level of quality of the thorax pikes.
@@mattiaproserpio1453 they came into the Spartan Army with the reforms of King Cleomenes III which in what I remember is to keep up with its neighbors especially Macedonia
@@JohnDoe-zy6tm heresy we dont speak of cleo the third
this video made me realize how flaccid a charge into a pike wall looks. they should've animated in a way that some people get through into the middle of the wall and die in a unique animation that occurs when you charge pikes
u mean being impaled?
It is just strange how a wedge Formation halts in the moment of contact.
Unsurprisingly people do not like literally throwing themselves into pikes.
@@borbarad2.0 It's not strange at all. You won't find many horses out there that will willingly impale themselves. Them stopping short is something that actually happened. Whether or not the devs intention was to simulate this is a different topic though, and I don't think they did. The collision physics of this game are wonky to this day which is why even the ones in the back stopped.
@@blooperman1997 yes, looks more like an emergency brake with no leeway. (Not native english, so could probably need another word)
I must admit, the elephant victory felt so satisfying...
I love elephants and its a nightmare to image humans dragging them into our fights... but if I have ever seen anything more badass that a war elephant I forgot about it lol
@Red Eye Orb what about the far away to be from his mainland and his army mutiny because so many years of campaign?
@@mariano98ify Just let him be, blessed be simple men.
But he did beat Indian king Porus.He just didnt continue because a bad dream about elephants and various reasons
@Red Eye Orb not really... He won a decisive battle at the Hydaspes river against an opponent who fielded many war elephants, those were definitely not what stopped Alexander’s expansion. Given time, he would surely have cooked up a counter strategy to deal with these new, unfamiliar beasts in a more effective manner. No, it was the morale of his men that checked his expansion; so far away from home, for so long, they refused to go any further. Perhaps diseases played a part as well.
Point is, it definitely wasn’t the elephants.
so moral of the story: to counter anything from Egypt just use pikemen
But be aware of their archers 🤪
@@niels2002 no need peroikoi pikemen have 65 armor so it counters most projectiles
Except for egypt also has pikemen. Some of the best ones in the game actually...
Take care of the slingers, though - pikeman suck at missile defence.
You need the Roman Legion to break a Phalanx
I do miss the way soldiers would push against one another and move around while fighting in Rome 1.
Yeah this looks silly.
Agreed.
Apparently, the new Warscape engine simply doesn't simulate things like physics and individual soldiers' agency anymore...
Not only that I remember in rome 1 that even when the chariots kill themselves against the phallanx they still break the phallanx so you can throw more bodies to the breach before they form again... Rome 2 is very beautiful and all of that but it's really ridiculous.
@Tyvadia yeah they're wearing nostalgia gogles. Rome 1 was great, but the actual battles in Rome 2 are better.
@Tyvadia Sometimes people suck nostalgia way too much
Now
EVERY EGYPTIAM UNIT CHARGING A PHALANX WALL FROM BEHIND
Imagine watching your favourite faction being clapped by some hoplite Spartan bois
imagine Egypt being your favorite faction. imagine
@@kenrudd6362 l don’t have to imagine that lmao
@@alexomastoras thank you for being a good sport about it got no hate for the gypos
@@kenrudd6362 Egypt is fun to play with. Versatile unit roster.
@@ajmalsafi13 Sparta sucks because CA made hoplite fights boring
Moral of the story: Charging anything other than levy pikemen head on is a pit brain move.
Charging pikes head on is a dummy move in the first place
@@pergys6991 unless it’s artillery rounds then that will work all day
how to neat said pike wall. turn around then proceed to pull your pants down bend over and run backwards while screaming. confusing your enemy
Even levy pikes can beat most other non pike units when faced head on.
In campaign, I beat the campaign as Epirus on legendary difficulty using levy pike as my mainline infantry. They are great even against the higer tier non pike infantries. And if you lose them, you don't really care because they are so freaking cheap to replace.
Unless you got elephants😎
12:48 is how I imagine actual phalanx warfare to look.
"Attack us!" "No u first"
Honestly you aren’t that far off, a lot of pike fights happened at this distance, but what isn’t represented are the brave lads who would crawl BENEATH the engaged pikes to slash at each other with swords, or even move up and scythe the ankles of the opponent. This fighting was done on their knees or crouched.
''oh hey look they have a bunch of pikes, better keep going forwards''
Man, i can't remember how many ridiculus sieges i've won because the enemy couldn't be bothered to actualy flank my Pikemen
Just finished a Macedonian campaign. Took me a while to realise while defending a city against a full stack, if i fight the battle manually and use the garrison pikemen to block the walk exit at the bottom, i can inflict huge casualties and even take the W sometimes (if they don't have enough infantry and the AI funnels them all to the same place).
Cheesy but satisfying 😌
17:40 thats DEFINITELY not how it goes in Total War Troy xD
Lmao imagine if that was the case
Troy is the worst game
@@biblicalbasher7908 ok
in troy u send in your hero to blob up the enemy for 5 mins while your archers shoot the blob and the enemy runs. there wont be any pikes or chariots cuz they arent needed with this 1 hero unkillable for 5 mins
Chariout crash was so funy)))
15:14 - Imagine being the first poor bastards to charge headlong into pikes, lmao. I also love how they just flop, barely with any animation and even crash into a few of the pikemen.
I feel like if the elephant dies the rider should stay alive and fend off the enemy.
That would be tight.
Actually there's a chance for a rider to survive even when a mount died. I remember playing Rome where one guy in my elepant unit walk since his mount died.
I also seen this in Shogun 2 one of my katana cav unit has that one guy that walk..
Don't know if this is a bug tho.
Chariots, cavalry, light infantry, spear-throwing infantry and elephants have their chances of giving more damage, taking less damage for a certain amount of time, and in some cases even win with a better tactic than just suicidal frontal attack. Flanking, outmaneuvering, throwing spears, shooting, hit-and-run (combined with flanking). All of this can make the pike phalanx wish to be somewhere else. That's the whole point of the Total War series: to actually use units in the best possible way and not just leaving them kill themselves over the enemy's blade.
Ik but this is ai and a 1v1 fight what else do you expect
The video is called every Egyptian unit charging into a Phalanx, and that's what it shows
The video is titled "Every egyptian unit charging a phalanx", what were you expecting?
The Archers and Slingman looked like Infantry
I particularly enjoyed watching 16 galloping horses crashing through at 17:51 without any of their half tonne bodies even making a pikeman stumble....
The elephants really surprised me, in Rome 1 they would all die instantly charging a phalanx so I never even tried in Rome 2, it's interesting to know that's actually a viable option if flanking isn't possible.
in real history romans legionary got rid of them(and chariots) by using caltrops
Moral of the story : If you are an archer , shoot your arrows
Possibly the scythed chariots only true weakness. But only a moron would direct charge into a wall of pikes with it. But bravo elephants for being the true pike destroyer!!!
Javies are their weakness too
@@nathanhull8302 basically any ranged unit will tear apart chariots easily
Did the Thorax Pikemen forget their pikes that day or something?
The men are wavering
I am proud to announce that I am the first to comment on this video
I am proud to announce that no one cares
im sorry i had to
I am proud to announce that no one asked
I am proud to announce that no one asked
I'm sorry I had to
4:04 “BAD BOYS! BAD BOYS! BAD BOYS!”
This is a PIKE phalanx. And not A phalanx.
The physics of the war engine still bothers me 😪 the ranks look like a a block of gel bouncing against the pikes. Which was less so the case in 2004
I just can't unsee it
Most of the units just stand and do nothing, very immersion breaking, just looks unrealistic...
You can’t seriously be saying that rome 1 looks better than this
@@squidward9826 the point is that rome 1 was Rome 1. Time has passed and this shit is still the same.
I think that's what he means
@@xalbathetallguy eh not really. There’s very clearly noticeable improvement, this videos just a poor example as units don’t know how to engage pikes
@@squidward9826 I'm talking about the engine specifically.
While the graphics and animations are much more refined, unit collision and how they engage eachother is just painful to watch.
In Rome 1, as the unit is about to charge, the first rank speeds up, and the ranks behind slow down when the first line is engaged already. They don't all simultaneously run at the exact same speed, and then collide into eachother.
I don't know if you've played much Rome 1 back in the day, but the way units behave in Rome 2 really feels off, despite Rome 1 being far from perfection, although it was a masterpiece for its time ofcourse.
Please make Every Iceni unit vs phalanx wall
Phalanx can never win war elephants for these war elephants Alexander was defeated for the 1st time in india
1:35 I can't believe they didn't win with those levitating swords :o
The egyptian infantry the know best infantry on the game😂
2:30 you miserable sus
You need a Roman Legion to break a Phalanx
17:27 looks at the top of the screen and you can see a soldier magically appear
17:25 - 17:29
What Romans would say when they see such a battle:
- Futuite, beluae istae porro nil tenent!
You are not doing it right, phalanx line is not enough wide and can be flanked by side.
Enough wide -》wide enough
Charges are exceptionally boring in this game. Go back to the first title to see what an action-packed charge looks and sounds like.
Can we just take a moment to realize that in real life those pike wouldn't have stopped that entire infantry charge?
Why wouldn’t they have? There are several lines of pikes at varying distances. Even if you got past one line, which is difficult enough in its own regard, you’d still have a second line, and a third line, and potentially a forth line of sharp pikes that you’d have to bypass before ever even being close enough to effectively engage. Also, I don’t think Alexander the Great would’ve used pikemen as his frontline if they couldn’t stop an infantry charge, especially at battles like Guagamela.
In real life the horses will be too scared to frontal charge and get impaled, that was one of the major problems in real life battles
you can also study history and see how 300 spartan hoplites under the command of king leonidas fucked over 20.000 persians...
you can also study the battle of marathon...if you study them please delete your comment....
@@steliosfras7313 it’s interesting that you use these examples. For starters, at the battle of Thermopylae, there were also 6,000 Greek allies, in addition to the 300 Spartans that guarded the pass, against a force of 80,000 Persians, not 20,000. In addition, the Greeks didn’t use pikes, but rather their (comparatively) shorter spears and swords in the hoplite phalanx formation. Granted, that is a nitpick, but still important to mention.
In regards to the Battle of Marathon, the Greeks took positions in marshy and mountainous terrain, which, had they been using a pike phalanx style would have been just about the worst position they could have been in, and soundly defeated the mostly ranged Persians through flanking actions. The Athenians’ strategy was to consolidate the best of the landed Persian warriors in the center, in that bad terrain, and proceed to surround and slaughter them. Information on both of these topics was just a quick google search, if you’d like to try and disprove me
As someone who has played the original Rome total war game countless times I can say with confidence that the Spartan hoplites are by far the best phalanx unit if not the best infantry unit in the game... Excellent moral incredibly good armour and skill defence...not even attacking them from behind with a heavy cavarly charge affects their moral all that much only way to beat them is to either overwhelm them with powerful hand to hand fighting units until their phalanx formation is broken or kill the most of them with deadly ranged units...
What about punic phalanx?
Elephants are not suicidal and would not charge into a wall of pointy spears. Like chariots, the phalanx would purposely open up slightly setting a trap on 3 sides and the elephant would be speared until disabled. Likely before many elephants would even be fatally wounded they would be so pissed off getting poked they’d be bolting out of there. They were very rarely used for charging. Historically their main use was as elevated mobile missile platforms with 1-3 which archers. Elephants are smart creatures, not stupid like horses that will blindly charge a wall of spears. Phalanx would overcome these units armed with too few actual men as soon as they got too close
did you know roman Testudo was so effective, units would stay rained on by archers for hours and only lose about a handful of men. crazy.
also we are getting more and more info about the usefullness of it, for example there are text that describe that f.ex one roman centuri would form a testudo and make a ramp to cross ditches or climb embankments, its blooody genius
Phalanx wall
My brain: YARI WALL
Ashigaru are yarimazing!
its not fair you must let the unites which have missiles use their missile capabilities ... move back and shoot everything before they charge. its like you are micro managing the Spartans but just leading the Egyptian to their death
Chariot charge and cavalry got me 🤣🤣🤣
They were gangsta until the elephants came.
Actually the phalanx will be finished since the slinger ..
Keep steady lads not much longer" wtf ,honestly hate how they all speak British English
Muh' murican "english"
Tbh whats the point of raising your spears? Its not like random tabs berserkers are gonna jump into your lines
They fixed the unit collision, lovely!
chad egyptian units vs virgin macedonian phalanx
It's all bull shit. Yesterday I created battle much better than this foolish attacks. Selevkids versus egiptians. Pikes versus pikes, cataphracts versus camel archers, archers versus archers. Moreover, there was a sea battle. 6 large ships versus 6 large ships. Only two of Egyptians ships won the battle, but the were on fire and didn't make it to the land. About 770 Egyptians versus 720 seleukids. About 100 Egyptians left, but I won. That was the battle... sorry for mistakes, I am foreigner.
Great video.
The physics of the units charging looks terrible though in comparison to RTW units. Still playing Roma Surrectum and I cannot see the improvement?
Without flanking, pikes are king
Artillery rounds would like a word with you on that
@@TheManofthecross companion cavalry would like a word with ur artillery
@@providedyeti1518 heh so you say. touche with that counter though this is a one on one in the vid or so.
units charge into things they would never charge into....units fight to the last 10% which wouldn't happen
it's just modeled so bad
TW AI is pretty limited and well, stupid. You can pit praetorian guard vs shield bearer and SB will win all the time. While in real history, the Romans wrecked the Greeks so hard.
i can just imagine them saying “I WILL SACRIFICE MY LIFE FOR EGYPTTTTTT!” then get absolutely gutted.
Elephants are a bitch to beat!!
The worst simulator i ever seen or remember.
How did I get here
why were the thureos spearmen allowed to fire multiple rounds of javelins and not the karian axemen, javalinmen and others?
Chơi cánh đi add
Chơi trung ko đanh đc mà hao binh
i was wondering why everything looks so much the same and bland, then i realized ive been playing divide et impera for 2 years xd
Morality of this video " Don't ever fuck with elephants "
Flank attack with archers, protests and finally cavalry will defeat a phalanx with Larissa.
Bruh those chariots should have gone right through even if the horses died. That’s a fucked up phalanx if they even survive
I am surprised to see a phalanx pike did this much to elephants considering these fuckingg tanks do not die to a single onager shot
Assalamualaikum
Wtf
This makes me sad. Egypt is my favourite faction.
"One word I give you - elephants." - Yoda (maybe)
0:13
Phalanx men:was that supposed to hurt?
So, it's basically invincible if there's a circle formation?
Wonder how the Phalanx would hold up to a 30 or 50 degree charge instead of Head on.
There's no fucking way you can hold a shield and 16 foot long sarissa.
Is it just me or elephants in m2tw is much bigger than elephants here
Well, that was bloody...
I didn't knew Egyptians had elephants 😂
Conclusion: do not fuck with elephant.
Charge in Rome 1 was so much better. Shame.
в реальности же ни кто не будет прыгать на пики а просто обойдет их и будет рубить саблей с боку и с тыла и проскочит про скользит под пиками или схватит руками эти пики и отберёт!
I don't think Sparta even had a sarissa phalanx
1988 ROME JULES REMI GOFFLO CÉSAR MARC ANTOINE ROMAN
EGYPTE REINE CLÉOPÂTRE ROME JULES REMI GOFFLO CÉSAR MARC ANTOINE ROMAN
Ok now it's the Tomb Kings turn
How tf do u counter elephants? Im new to the game
Ultimately War Elephant 🐘
FUKKEN GO AROUND
Emporia Kansas 66801
2:17 cuando t bajan la pluma del estacionamiento y vas en moto
Do they not know how to flank...
Wtf archer charging them
Best unit vs cavalry
Use some mods or not in this video?
War elephant ftw!!!!
The holdup quite a fight with those elephants
Freaking snipers
Macedon be like
A well ordered phalanx, from the front, can only be defeated by a better phalanx. Even heavy infantry can at best hold the line.
But if attacked from behind or flanked, disrupted by terrain or chariot/elephant or heavy cav charge? They fall very quickly.
4:00 Bad boy 😂
Are thoose normal spartan pikemen?
Full gold
Soldier: Charging into pikes
Soldier: dies
Soldier: *Surprised pikachu face*
Spartan pikemen leve 9 vs units anything level, i love you versus
FAKE