KOTOR vs D&D, the Untold Story | Roll For Combat Ryan Dancey Clip
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Ryan Dancey, the co-creator of the original Open Gaming License (OGL 1.0a) answers the question if Hasbro could actually get the rights to Star Wars if their OGL 1.1 goes through, and the answer might surprise you!
Check out the original video this was clipped from, One of the Architects of the Original OGL, Ryan Dancey, Discusses Its Creation | Roll For Combat ► • One of the Architects ...
Download the OGL 1.1 here ► ogl.battlezoo.com/
Original release of the OGL 1.1
@TenkarsTavern ►► • I Have the OGL 1.1 in ...
@Indestructoboy ►► • I have D&D's OGL 1.1
Check out our other videos relating to OGL 1.1:
►► The New OGL 1.1 Is Pretty Horrible, But It Will Be Very Hard to Enforce: • The New OGL 1.1 Is Pre...
►► Expert Contract Lawyer Explains WotC's New OGL 1.1 and What It Means: • Expert Contract Lawyer...
►► We Received the Original and FIRST Leak of the Open Gaming License 1.1 (OGL) Live On Air!: • We Received the Origin...
Please support our 5e and Pathfinder products at battlezoo.com/
🐉 Play a Dragon PC, explore the Indigo Isles, create gear from monster parts, and more at: battlezoo.com/ 🐉
✨ Never before have players been able to play such legendary monsters in their PF2 and 5e games such as mimics, slimes, and intelligent weapons... until now! Check out the Year of Monsters at: battlezoo.com/... ✨
Follow the Roll For Combat and their many podcasts:
►► / rollforcombat
►► discord.rollfor...
►► / rollforcombat
►► / rollforcombat
►► / rollforcombat
Subscribe to the podcast:
►► itunes.rollforc...
►► www.subscribeon...
Thumbnail by Rich Merry at: / richmerry0
#dnd #dungeonsanddragons #OpenDnD #ogl
I am glad to hear the details on this from THE source, I have been telling everyone that KOTOR would have its own license. I am going to have to share this to help people understand.
West End went bankrupt, I was actually in contact with one of the developers and one of the owners of west end, I was a game demostrator for west end. :) I miss that company so much. They were good people. I wish I still had the email I got explaining it all.
As strange as it sounds, as a gamer since 1978, I find this drama and discussions fascinating but no real surprise (T$R days). WotC really put their foot in it.
You said on the live stream I just watched that paizo gave a free pdf when you purchase the physical book. That is only for a subscription. But people can buy either the physical book or pdf (which is cheaper).
I'd like to see more of these clips. Thank you!
The last argument would mean that any content that is not self published where the publisher does not own the complete rights are safe from being stolen by WOTC.
I played KotOR and I played D&D 3.0/3.5. KotOR's system is very 3.0 inspired.
Well it could just as easily be a D100 game
@@sky0kast0
D20 = Roundup(D100/5,0)
It's pretty much Star Wars D20 or maybe Star Wars D20 Revised based.
So I think Ryan Dancey is incorrect in his current analysis of the OGL 1.0a, and it would be very interesting if you could get him to clarify.
According to some knowledgable people on reddit, it is absolutely not a settled legal fact that WotC cannot 'deauthorise' the OGL 1.0a. It could become legal fact if somebody sued over it, but at present 'deauthorising' is something they legally WotC can do.
Now it is highly likely that if this did happen and it went to court WotC would lose in law, HOWEVER given the case would be long and expensive and Hasbro would try and avoid a summary judgement, it's not clear whether anybody would have the stomach / funds for the fight.
Dancey is obviously correct in saying “we didn’t intend for it to be revokable”, but it is not clear he successfully implemented his intent.
It IS revocable in law, but Hasbro would almost certainly lose if it went to court if their opponents could last the legal fight.
Would be very interesting for you to put this to Ryan, as it changes how 3pp should approach the situation.
[posted this on heath's geekverse as well]