Several of the original signatories had their homes burnt to the ground. Over a dozen lost their entire fortunes. Many had wives and children jailed, and several were killed in the war. NONE BAILED.
5 of them were killed during the war, serving in as much a military manner as feasibly possible, 7 others bore wounds post-Conflict as a reminder of the oath they swore. Yet not one yielded or forsook the cause. They never tell many of that, so they wrongfully assume that it was a bunch of rich politicians making political gain for themselves at the expense of the common folk... When the history tells that they suffered immensely.
It is interesting how everyone has a mixture of shock, terror, and despair in their face, and yet Benjamin Franklin just nods like "yup, I knew that is how it was going to go down"
@@Imjustasimpleman5310 not only did he live there but he received such a reception as a "colonial" that he ceased being an Englishman - and was "the First American" --- great book (2002) by H. W. Brands: " The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin"
Before Franklin left Britain he had appeared before a consul just after news of the Boston tea party where he was verbally abused for the actions of the sons of Liberty. He knew exactly how the British would react to Olive branch petition in light of the actions at Lexington and Concord.
"All 13 clocks must strike at the same second." Man, I couldn't imagine trying to unify and get 13 different governments to agree to risk their necks for independence. Especially back then when it took days or weeks to send a message across the country.
They risk their lives, the future of their country, with an uncertain victory in the war, whereas today's politicians play the game of gambling soldiers lives or not, depending on which will get them elected next term.
Up to that point they were British. They may have been across the Atlantic, but they saw themselves as Englishmen. When the response from the King arrived that was over.
Well, they didn’t want separation, it was the very last resort to achieve their liberty and freedom. They didn’t want war or separation, yet when they were not being heard or listened to, they had no choice.
It's actually really startling when you start reading more primary sources of the era how much loyalty and faith was placed in the King personally, even by people who would later become revolutionaries. That seems strange to us today, but at the time the real venom of American anger was targeted towards parliament and the ministers. Many believed that once the King got involved he would redress their grievances. The cult of Monarchy was still strong throughout American society. If George had used the least bit of political tact, he could have easily kept the revolutionaries under control.
The King Betrayed us. We asked but to simply be represented in parliament so that taxation may be argued from our position as well. So that we may have a voice and be given the rights due to us as citizens under his kingship. His Majesty's Response? A spit in our face and an increase in violence. The Crown Betrayed Americans and made us so.
I love Dickenson's face the first time "traitors" is read from the King's proclamation. He really believed in the King being merciful up until that moment. That really rocked his world. Amazing acting from all the cast in this segment, loved it.
@Kyle Alexander Wilson No. He told them to cease treasonous activities tha directly threaten the British Empire as a whole. The King made it clear that if they were to stop then they would be handled with "tenderness and mercy". They did not stop and instead took the approach of insurrection and treason, so the British Government responded to the threat. The American Government did similar to the Southern states.
@Kyle Alexander Wilson Bearing arms was not the treasonous activity. It was aiming those arms at the King's soldiers. The press were going about their usual thing. The writing's of Paine is a fine example of that. The assembled plenty. They only had to disperse from their assembly when they were causing serious issues to safety or property; like in the modern U.S. Or in the cass of tragic accidents like The Boston Massacre. John Adams defended those soldiers in court. They also assembled in the Continental Congress with representatives from all 13 colonies own governing bodies. Elections where anyone can vote is rather modern though. You can't judge the British Government on that and not the American. Yes the soldiers living in peoples home isn't great. In fact I hate it. I also hate the fact that the American government can justify taking my land through eminent domain. I don't understand how this makes me a traitor. I love my home, being the United States, and specifically the Keystone State Pennsylvania. I'm just pointing out that King George III was not Emperor Palpatine.
The King was misled -- by his own "designing men" at court, as well as by his royal narcissism and stern, paternalistic German temperament -- into believing that only a small cadre of the conniving disaffected had initiated and conducted the Revolution to date, against the best interests AND WISHES of the mass of the colonists. He failed to see the thing for what it was -- a popular resistance movement enjoying wide support in most of the colonies, albeit one necessarily LED and REPRESENTED by members of the colonies' intellectual and economic elite. His response to the Olive Branch Petition was thus predictably off-base and harmed Britain's own cause. When war came, Britain's strategy was similarly misguided -- the King's armies kept moving from region to region hoping to unlock the "masses of popular support for the Crown" they had been told to expect; but the local Tories were easily intimidated and their military contribution fairly small.
When I was a student in Phila., things were very different and I could sit in Washington's chair. Brought a small plastic hammer with me one day to "ring" the Liberty Bell (it was in the foyer then and the clapper was immobilized). On the second floor there are 2 beautiful portraits of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, gifts to the American people. She wore the diamond ear rings you can now see at the Smithsonian. They were gifts from her husband on the occasion of the birth of one of their children. I got into the attic one day but don't remember any details.
I never watched this show but damn this is powerful. The Man who was so sure of sending a petition of peaceful negotiation to the King received a "Submit to me or die." reply. The sheer horror on his face was unfiltered.
It really shows just how much the British government misread the colonies and underestimated them. At every step, from the proclemation of 1763 to the Coercive acts, to the attacks on Lexington and Concord, to the rejection of the Olive Branch Petition, he missed every opportunity to negotiate. He could have just said he was open to negotiation, even if he would make only symbolic gestures, if only to keep the rebels divided. But he didn't think he had to, because he thought he could destroy the rebels anyway.
I highly, highly recommend watching the series. Its absolutely brilliant. Paul Giamatti does his best work as John Adams. It should be required viewing for every Representative and Senator in Congress today.
One of my two favorite "mini series" John Adams and Band Of Brothers, both just masterpieces from beginning to end. Both make you feel as close to knowing what it must have been like to have lived and died in those times.
@@jeffcooper9363 If you mean they fall into obscurity, I think Band Of Brothers has been recognized for the work it was the the actual soldiers are famous now for their service. John Adams seems to be one of the overlooked founding fathers, and that's crazy cause he loomed large. I hadn't realized he'd defended the British soldiers from the Boston Massacre and won. He was totally against slavery and never had engaged in slave ownership. He also invented the internet and cellphone; just some little known facts. The More You Know! LOL
@@umbraemilitos Our congress gave Afghanistan $160 million dollars in aircraft, but not the training to pilot or maintain them. After sitting on the tarmac for a few years, the Afghanistan government scrapped them for junk at pennies on the ton.
@@SM-4359 Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist here but it could be that it was some sort of plot to earn money for the weapons manufacturing friends of some politicians with the use of tax dollars, say an appeasement to fund their agendas and future re-elections while minimizing the probable threat that it could pose for the US. I don't know man but US politics is shady as hell sometimes.
Cry Havoc - That is a great line, but there’s no indication that Franklin ever actually said it. It was first published decades later and is probably apocryphal...
I find a bit of humor in Tom Wilkinson portraying Benjamin Franklin when he also portrayed General Lord Charles Cornwallis in "The Patriot". I do enjoy his performances.
It's moments like this where you gotta admire the 56 men that signed the Declaration of Independence (John and Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Hancock, etc.) because they all knowingly signed what was essentially their own death warrant if America lost the war or if they were somehow captured before the war's end in 1783. John Adams almost got captured on his diplomatic mission to France in crossing the Atlantic and Philadelphia was captured by the British in 1777. I mean hell, in 1776, the Continental Army was not doing all that well and the French had not yet agreed to lend their support, and yet in spite of all that they still signed knowing the risks.
The continental army never did good. Never prevailed. Never winning a unanimous victory. Just an endless string of fighting retreats until they were cornered in New York. Even the victory at Trenton was only so because so sure of victory was cornwallis and the elite that they ordered most of the army back to England expecting full surrender. There were ships which could have possibly caught the armada, but finding them would have been difficult. It would have then taken months on end to turn south to catch the Westerlies and ride them back to the Caribbean and then back up the coast to Boston and New York. Had they only waited a few weeks more, the end of hostilities would have been markedly different.
I love how people try to downplay the military achievements of the continental forces. You're saying that the only reason that the British lost was their hubris? If that is the case, Britain may have been run by the most incompetent group of men in quite some time. You fail to realize that the British Empire had no stomach for a drawn out war in which began because the empire raised taxes to pay for another recent costly war. The empire had nothing to gain, really. If they lost, it only hurt their pride. The revolutionary war to the citizens of England was more akin to the Vietnam War to Americans during the 1960's-70's.
John Adams - a 7 part series based on the book of the same name by David McCullough. It is very well done, but some reviewers didn’t get it, thinking that the casting for Adams wasn’t “heroic” enough - utterly laughable. This wasn’t Washington or Hamilton. Adams was a man of little physical prowess, but a giant of a brain and an ego to match (the later got him in trouble as a president as he couldn’t work with his own party). His best strength was his wife Abigail who had a brain to match his own and the strength to run a farm (without slaves - she hired free black) and raise and educated their children (one another future president) while he met destiny in the founding of our nation. Some don’t find it “lush” enough compared with British period dramas, but this was colonial America…a backwater of the world at this time, and the sets and locations reflect that.
@@DavBlc7 The war had already been going on for a year. Franklin wanted to use George's proclamation to promote the colonies declaring independence from Britain, not to start an already ongoing war.
Franklin had tried hard to keep the peace between the colonies and England. They publicly humiliated him while in England and that was it. He instantly became a revolutionary. He knew there was no turning back.
You don’t like our members of Congress? Look who elected them. The Americans of today are nothing like the Americans of 1775. They turn out in droves to elect loudmouth perverts like Matt Gaetz and whacked out conspiracy mongers like Marjorie Taylor-Greene. Don’t pretend like none of that isn’t our fault.
@@zatchbell622 they also turn out in droves to elect pathetic idiots like Biden, incompetent snots like Harris, anti-semitic garbage like Omar, vile little tyrants like Pelosi, scheming hypocrites like Schumer, avowed anti-American marxists like Warnock, AOC, Sanders ... shall I go on? With few exceptions, all of these reprehensible Democrat insects do the bidding of their corporate, media and New World Order masters to turn America into a one-party totalitarian state and destroy the republic that these founding patriots risked their lives to create... and that the Greatest Generation fought so valiantly to preserve.
The best thing to do is keep tract of those you elect in you own community, they you can keep honest and an eye on, those in DC are there for themselves only and no one else save one or two exceptions.
All of that is true, yet without the intervention of God Almighty in that war, they would have been a footnote amongst history's great losers. No way they should have won that war but for circumstance after circumstance of the hand of Providence seeing them through.
@John Isaac Felipe I think there's a pretty big difference between continuing to be ruled by a monarch thousands of miles away without any representation and staying within the EU which is made up of the member nations themselves. Not even close to comparable.
@James Gray It was. And if those loyalists had been willing to fight with the same passion and perseverance as the Continentals, the War of Independence could have turned out very differently. They mostly chose to stay home and hide indoors.
@@josephmariani9945 I can think of some "successful" attempts at treason, wherein the committing party was purely out for themselves/profit, not for an overthrow of the government. They may not overthrow the government they ostensibly serve, but they do betray it. You are right though, that the failures are often much more loudly pronounced "TREASON!!!" than the successes.
Yeah that’s right the southern states were fighting for the same principles this nation was founded on and it’s only called treason or being a rebel if you lose!!!!!!
Reminds me of a line from 1776. "A rebellion is always legal in the 1st person, such as 'our rebellion'. It's the 3rd person, 'their rebellion' that's illegal "
This is the point where we see these men as more than "just men" These are people putting not just themselves at risk, but thousands of their own people in peril for a cause. A cause that they in their hearts believed to be just and righteous. God bless America
"We will now all hang together. Or must assuredly we will all hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin Gangsta line. One of the two great lines he drops in this series. So gangsta.
"All thirteen clocks must strike at the same second." The actual quote to to Benjamin Kent, June 22, 1776, in a letter was, " But remember you can't make thirteen Clocks, Strike precisely alike, at the Same Second." It is beginning to sink in with me how much we owe to these insurrectionists....literally EVERYTHING.
@@falconeshield I had no intention to try and make Jan 6th people look good. re·bel·lion: noun an act of violent or open resistance to an established government or ruler. "the authorities put down a rebellion by landless colonials" Similar: uprising revolt insurrection mutiny revolution insurgence
I'm surprised Benjamin Franklin handled the news so well. Out of the founding fathers he was arguably the most loyal one. So much so that he installed that loyalty to the crown so strongly in his son that the two never reconciled after the rebellion. Franklin's son thought this betrayed everything he was ever taught to believe.
Franklin's opinion of the British Government had soured years prior to the Declaration, after he was ridiculed on the floor of Parliament for injudiciously exposing the contents of certain confidential letters while acting as Postmaster General for the Colonies and as PA's agent in Britain. He lost his posts, was nearly arrested, and brooded over the matter for the several weeks it took him to return to PA by ship. When he stepped off that boat he was a changed man, unalterably opposed to the Crown and its Government and determined that America should be done with both of them. Franklin was not only incredibly intelligent, but articulate, fairly wealthy, well-connected, self-disciplined, and stubborn about achieving any goal he set for himself. He had a talent for discourse, and for putting complex facts in simple terms that helped others -- even if they were of a different background than his own -- to readily see the plain truth and desirability of any proposition he favored. Arguably he became, with Washington, the most dangerous American the Brits had to face.
@@roberthaworth8991 That's fascinating. I wasn't aware of this background event. For an overly intelligent threat to the crown, he was nonetheless undermined by one of the most successful spies in British history while in France.
@@roberthaworth8991 I was just about to mention how he was ridiculed on the floor of Parliament. He was English when he went into Parliament, and American when he came out.
They realized (quite wisely) that in order for the revolution to succeed, it had to happen all over the colonies at the same time to keep the British stretched thin. Had simply one state declared independence on its own it would have been utterly crushed by the sheer concentrated might of the British military machine, but altogether, it vastly weakened its ability to concentrate forces in any particular area. That was what wound up being our redeeming strategy.
The founding fathers embodied the proverb - "A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit" Those statesmen who were on the fence before, now had no other choice but to pick a side. We are lucky that the majority of them chose to persist.
@@jebbroham1776 Also outlasting public support from the UK for them to fight the war, and it had lasted for like 8 years and actually worked. The south in the Civil War tried the same thing but failed, including their attempt for foreign assistance
@@murphyandotherstuff6884 The joke is that the actor for Benjamin Franklin in this mini-series also played as the actor for General Cornwallis in the movie The Patriot. Which has the hilarious implication of Ben Franklin/Cornwallis rapidly jumping back and forth in different outfits and living the ultimate double-life to play both sides against each other like some sort of one-man Illuminati.
Tom Wilkinson was born and spent his early years in Yorkshire, and his normal speaking voice has traces of that accent. But apparently his family then moved to Canada for a few years and finally came back to the UK and settled in Cornwall. The accent that he uses in this rôle is largely a Westcountry accent, and more authentic to my ears (I am a Devonian, from the next county to Cornwall) than the usual 'Mummerset' accent affected by actors when required to do a Westcountry accent. Since many of the sailors who manned ships sailing to the New World were likely to have been from the West Country, and perhaps many settlers too, their accent would have contributed strongly to the American accent. However, I don't think that Franklin's forebears had any connection with South West England.
"We will now all hang together, or most assuredly we will all hang separately." Franklin, as usual. hit the nail on the head. This was the moment when the impetus for independence happened.
I finally got around to watching the whole John Adams show this past summer over the course of a few days. Absolutely one of the most powerful shows I have ever watched. I appreciate shows that try hard to bring the moment to moment of life into history. All to often it is easy to read a few paragraphs from a book in school and walk away with knowledge of events but with no understanding of their impact. Stuff like this helps to show you those events, and bring humanity to the black and white text from the pages.
This was read on October 26, 1775 (nearly 245 years ago to the very day) during the first session of the Second Continental Congress. John Adams would continue to persist in trying to get unanimity among the colonies for another 8 months before the Declaration of Independence was ratified and signed by the 56 members present.
I remember arriving to this amazing country as a kid and learning about the founding fathers, their courage, their sacrifice, their achievements, I've had no other heroes to admire. w
@@souperstar7050A lot of American liberals hate the founders simply due to slavery which was a common practice around the world in those days and most of the founders did think that slavery was incompaitable with the ideals of the American Revolution and should end but couldn’t end it in their lifetime. Liberals like to act morally superior and think that if they lived back then they would have been the good guy when most would not have been.
A great collective acting performance. From Justin Theroux to Paul Giamatti to Tom Wilkinson, and everyone in between, it really showed the collective weight on their shoulders, and that a peaceful resolution was no longer on the table. Most importantly, it showed that this was an all or nothing proposition, cause if they lost, they were dead. At least that is my take on it.
@@johnnotrealname8168 what about treason would mean the signers of the Declaration of Independence would not have been executed? It’s a thing that used to happen all the time. If any signer had been captured he would have been executed for treason 100% likelihood.
I can say as an American, England was right in imposing alot of the taxes…. They had just spent an enormous amount of money protecting the colonies. Dont get me wrong i am a true Patriot but they had every right to tax us lol. Ahh well were all pals now lol
Already did. Half my life. I tried to make a difference. I really did. Spent last several years at the funny shaped building in DC. Hardly made a few scratches for good. I tried. I wasn't a yes man. Spent 24 years in the Army. Retired 90 percent disability. Thought about politics. Doubt I would do any better. Do I need to say more?
He knew what a war with England would bring, death and destruction to his people. We needed people like Dickinson to explore all peaceful options before war was on. Now though there's no choice, and his hopes of a kind response from the King are dashed. As much as Dickinson detested war, when war came, he put on a uniform and fought in it.
Imagine how much pressure they went through receiving that letter, being threatened by the most powerful empire on earth. AND STILL they fought on!! 💙🙏🙏💙🙏💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Britain was not the most powerful empire "on earth" at the time, or even in Western Europe. That title went to the French, the ones who actually won the American Revolution.
Benjamin Franklin was one of the last of the Founding Fathers to consent to American independence. He was one of the two postmasters of the colonies. He was a member of the Royal Society. His son was Governor of New Jersey. He had achieved more distinction than any American ever had, and a good part of that was by royal acclaim. During the troubles with the Mother Country, Benjamin Franklin had been one of the chief conciliatory voices, seeking accord between loyalty to the Crown and defense of colonial liberty. For his trouble, he was berated by the King's solicitor, Alexander Wedderburn, before a full Privy Council. Upon the signing of a treaty with the French, recognizing his new country America, Benjamin Franklin wore the same suit he had worn when he was made to be humiliated by the King's agent.
I viewed this series about a year ago. The film helped me anchor my belief that we have a great country despite our current difficulties. The film also illustrated to me that many current leaders have actively shunned their sacred oath to defend our constitutiion. I really ought to view it again soon.
@@nunyabiznez6381 What is "that" which you refer to? By the way, the social studies curriculum is under, and has been under great pressure to cover just about everything. If the social studies staffs followed every request, the kids would be in social studies class all day.
@@daveenyart When I attended school 44-58 years ago, high schools, jr. high schools and middle schools taught civics, history and geography and were only just introducing general courses in "social studies." The that which I am referring to is what you lamented, the shunning of their oath. This is due to their not grasping the meaning of their oath. They get away with it because the electorate, at least the younger members of the electorate, are ignorant of history of and the workings of our governmental system and what was intended by the founding fathers, my ancestors among them. Here is one difference. In middle school I did a report on a founding father who also happened to be my great, great, great, great, great grandfather and if you are educated you would recognize his name. The only hint I will give you is he signed something important in 1776 on behalf of his state. I got an A for my report. I chose him not simply as a way to brag about a historic connection but because I had been taught from early childhood about our family's participation in the formation of this country so I didn't need to so much research on him. At 12 I wrote a 2000 word essay about him off the top of my head then handed it to my Dad to edit and he could find no errors. Hence my A. More recently, my brother's grandson did the same. Except it was for a "social studies" class. We educate our children in my family, in our country's history filling in gaps the school leaves empty. As the family historian I was asked to edit my grand nephew's paper. He did well. This was not a research paper so he was not expected to cite sources but he did mention a few just the same. I only found one trivial error of dates and handed it back to him expecting he would get an A. He did not. He got an F and the teacher handed the paper back with multiple notes and red highlights indicating errors. At the bottom of the page one note says: "ALL FOUNDING FATHERS OWNED SLAVES AND THEREFORE WERE EVIL MONSTERS! 50% OFF FOR FAILING TO MENTION HIS SLAVE OWNERSHIP!" This particular ancestor/founding father never owned slaves and in fact made a concerted attempt at convincing his fellow founding fathers to free their slaves. He spoke out against slavery many times and wrote against the concept. I checked again and there were NO errors in my nephews paper. The teacher, however was mistaken in every thing she put on his paper especially the last part. I wrote a letter to the principal about this unfair grading and I then cited 47 established and irrefutably proven sources to prove my nephew's paper was 100% accurate. I demanded they change his grade to an A for being correct and apologize to him. The principal wrote back informing me that every source I cited was incorrect because they all contradicted their text book. I read the text book. I won't dignify it by naming it. In a nut shell it was nothing but wholly invented bunk claiming that the entire "white race is evil" and goes on rambling on and on about how we are collectively guilty of the sins of our distant ancestors and about a grand conspiracy to suppress all manner of "truth." In that textbook it even claims that the first president of the United States was actually African. I looked the guy up and he was born after our constitution was written. He was also not involved in national government in any way. THIS is what is being taught in our schools to indoctrinate children in the extreme left fringe of lunacy. I'm a centrist. And in fact, I actually blame the Republicans for this since they were the ones who cut school funding in the first place which left no room in school budgets for courses, real courses in civics. when I was in high school we were required to pass four years of civics, four years of history (two US and two world) and one year of geography. Social Studies was an elective take it or leave it. I took it and it included sections on anthropology, psychology, sociology and some other related topics and was interesting. What passes for social studies today is nothing but politically correct paranoid propaganda and enforced guilt trips.
"A Proclamation by the King: You say the price of my love is not a price you’re willing to pay. You cry in your tea which you hurl in the sea when you see me go by..."
I love when Hancock reads "For those who persist in their treason..." twice as if to clear his throat after his eyes see the words that followed. Like "Oh sheeeeeeeeit I don't even want to say this next part out loud." Phenomenal casting, acting directing, etc. Minus some historical inaccuracies (very few), the whole damn series is perfect. I watch it once a year.
2:07 - Franklin's facial expression is perfect. You can clearly tell that he is mentally processing various ways to deal with the situation upon hearing this gut-punching news
Of all the men in that room, he was the one least surprised. He'd known from his experiences in Britain that the Olive Branch Petition would fail and thus had months to steel his resolve for what he knew would be inevitable. What's more, that same experience dealing with Parliament personally and being torn down by them had long embittered him to the motherland and had already molded him into a man perfectly willing to be done with them already. He just bided his time in the Congress until the King's response would force the other men to get on board for what was coming.
The brilliant portrayal of Franklin by Tom Wilkinson added a new layer to the story for me. Franklin seems somewhat cavalier over the prospect of rebellion, but at his advanced age he had much less to risk than some of the men in their 30's and 40's. An yet his stubborn nature was crucial in moving things forward.
You know, after watching this series the other day (binge watching this is a July 4 ritual for me), the thought occurred to me that maybe this olive branch petition and others that Adams decried as too soft were necessary, so they could at least say "Hey, we tried it your way." This scene should have been the wake-up call that war was the only way out.
There are a lot of great portrayals in this series, but an underrated one is Sam Adams. Prior to this mini-series, it had never occurred to me that Sam and John Adams were related. The brotherhood they show is fascinating--both of them so stubborn, but John more level-headed and pompous than his rasher brother, who nonetheless backs John up at every juncture. And here, Samuel's very concise reaction to the King's Proclamation, a statement of defiance which everyone else is too shocked to echo but which nonetheless everyone realizes is completely right.
They were second cousins actually, not brothers. Though since they both grew up in Boston and were of a similar age, it's unsurprising that they formed a close bond.
Fun fact: Sam Adams, as were many generations of his ancestors, was an actual maltster and produced the malt necessary for brewing beer. This is part of the origin of the Samuel Adams beer, introduced in 1984.
Right! I love how they captured that. The shot cuts to Jefferson and he's just staring into space like "Sheeeeeeeeit he's right" and then cuts to John and he quick turns to Sam like "Wow... Indeed".
None should have ever been frightened by this eventuality. All those young lads who stared death in the face in the field were fighting in their name. It's only fair that these men sit in that same boat. Fighting for their independence and facing death if they fail.
I don’t expect to get a reply as it’s been more than year and this video is many years old, but what was going on with his fingers on his right hand? Did he have frost bite or something?
It endures that the most amazing aspect of this history is the number of super egos that accepted compromise among themselves, without losing focus. What the flag should represent.
Did you know that Gen. Cornwallis disliked and was against the treatment of the colonists and the colonies. While he did his duty to the crown, he did not want the war.
If people only knew this story of these men who were ordered to be hung by the king but never gave up in fighting for the love of this country! Everyone needs to see this series.
One of my favorite scenes of this mini series is after being one of the main rabble rousers and knowing he was on King George's list of those to be hanged if ever caught, John Adams had to present himself to and bow before the king as the US's first ambassador to England. Talk about uncomfortable. I've read that, being an official proceeding, notes were taken at the time, and the dialogue in that scene is word for word what was actually said.
Happened to come across this clip on the 26th day of October in the year two thousand twenty-one.....246 years to the day of KGIII's speech to parliament.
Okay, just for perspective: the founders were going up against THE greatest power on the planet at that time. The British were known for conquest and military power. Best Navy, etc. It’s like reading a death note from Darth Vader, you don’t know if you’ll win but there will be a lot of death before and if you do. The fear at this moment in time must have been unimaginable - which makes me appreciate the Founding Fathers including Washington even more for their passion, standing up for what they believe in, and having a pair to say “No, we reject your offer. We’re no longer British but American,” despite almost every element being against them. Mad respect, thank God for this country.
Best navy, perhaps, with Spain and France being close contenders. But certainly not best army. The Prussian and French armies held that distinction. The British army was far smaller than either the Spanish, Prussian, French, Austrian or Russian armies. Redcoats are always portrayed as exceptionally disciplined and professional in movies, but they only seemed that way when compared to the American rebels. Compared to other European soldiers, the British didn't particularly stand out. Like everyone else, they had their elite units (which never set foot on the American continent), and their run-of-the-mill regulars, who were neither better nor worse than their European counterparts. According to contemporary sources. British soldiers had a reputation of being quarrelsome, insubordinate, and prone to excessive drinking. The so-called "Hessians", on the other hand, not all of whom were actually from Hessia, usually displayed a higher degree of discipline and professionalism. Incidentally, the Hessians were not merenaries, even though Americans to this day choose to unfairly denigrate them as such. They were regular soldiers, in the service of their respective princes. It was not the soldiers or even the officers, who sold their service to the British, but rather their own princes, who sold them away.
@@Timrath - There was an old saying in the British Navy: A messmate before a shipmate, A shipmate before a stranger, A stranger before a dog, and a dog before a soldier.
Things weren't quite so clear at the time. As with all history, particularly when national pride is involved, a lot of conclusions are retrospective, and don't reflect the perceptions at the time. While the British Empire was certainly in ascendency during the American Revolution, its super-power status wasn't realized quite yet. At the time, France, Prussia, and Austria were believed to be the big guys; and Britain was still a pretentious upstart. Britain's supremacy wouldn't be fully recognized until the defeat of Napoleon, which ironically came 32 years after the Revolution. I'd say the founders certainly had a lot on the line, and a lot to fear, but they also held a card that really paid off in the end. They had France in their back pocket, and that proved to be the deciding factor.
"All 13 clocks must strike at the same second." Back when most communication was sent on paper via ship, horse or on foot. Each town set it's own time, wrist watches didn't exist & pocket watches were for the rich. Amazing they got it done.
It would be almost a century before the first cannonade from units too far separated to hear each other's shots would be synchronized by timepieces, during the American Civil War. Adams is beyond cutting edge here.
It was said that up until that point some of them viewed the conflict as "a kind of lawsuit". Now it was apparent that the king was just going to use force to crush them instead of finding a way to work things out.
@@jayteegamble Yes, as it says on the label: This was the response to the much vaunted "Olive Branch Petition". Many shown here honestly believed King George would see that they did not consider themselves traitors, and wanted to remain British subjects. Here they learn better.
Has he not examined his own state seal? Does he truly believe he is Virtue, and not the Tyrant lying under her foot? I fear, greatly, that in his arrogance, he cares not a moth-eaten patch, not for Virtue, not for King George, and certainly not for the Founders, or for the people of the state he believes BELONGS to him and his kind.
@@johnroscoe2406 Either Putin Trump or Beijing Biden. Both parties compromised. You're just too focused on one to see the other for who he really is as well.
It's sort of funny seeing that Ben Franklin is played by the same actor that played General Lord Cornwallis in The Patriot.
...and that Alexander Hamilton went on to play Lord Melbourne in Victoria.
Tom Wilkinson is a damned fine actor.
Our man Tom is versatile.
General The Lord Cornwallis
I know right!!
Several of the original signatories had their homes burnt to the ground. Over a dozen lost their entire fortunes. Many had wives and children jailed, and several were killed in the war. NONE BAILED.
5 of them were killed during the war, serving in as much a military manner as feasibly possible, 7 others bore wounds post-Conflict as a reminder of the oath they swore.
Yet not one yielded or forsook the cause. They never tell many of that, so they wrongfully assume that it was a bunch of rich politicians making political gain for themselves at the expense of the common folk... When the history tells that they suffered immensely.
Imagine if they were around today? The buffoons in the Congress would never get away with the crap they're pulling
The traitors knew they could hide in France if their plot failed. So terrible to see what happened to the USA since then, but what do you expect?
@@moosefactorymullet You misspelled Patriots.
They broke their oath to the King in order to avoid paying tax, then accepted French, Spanish, Dutch protection… not patriotic at all. Read a book.
It is interesting how everyone has a mixture of shock, terror, and despair in their face, and yet Benjamin Franklin just nods like "yup, I knew that is how it was going to go down"
He just came back from Britain after living there for years. This gave him a good understanding of the British government's mindset.
@@Imjustasimpleman5310 not only did he live there but he received such a reception as a "colonial" that he ceased being an Englishman - and was "the First American" --- great book (2002) by H. W. Brands: " The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin"
Before Franklin left Britain he had appeared before a consul just after news of the Boston tea party where he was verbally abused for the actions of the sons of Liberty. He knew exactly how the British would react to Olive branch petition in light of the actions at Lexington and Concord.
That's why Benny gets his face on the $100 Bill
If you anything about the crown it was kinda obvious what would happen.
"All 13 clocks must strike at the same second."
Man, I couldn't imagine trying to unify and get 13 different governments to agree to risk their necks for independence. Especially back then when it took days or weeks to send a message across the country.
Miracle at Philadelphia
You should see the problems they had raising money to supply the army. Extra Credits did a good series on this.
They risk their lives, the future of their country, with an uncertain victory in the war, whereas today's politicians play the game of gambling soldiers lives or not, depending on which will get them elected next term.
Kevin Zhang depends on the country. If Ghana declared war on Ivory Coast, both leaders would be in danger.
@@armorsmith43 But in this case, it's more like Ghana declaring war on China.
Up to that point they were British. They may have been across the Atlantic, but they saw themselves as Englishmen. When the response from the King arrived that was over.
Well, they didn’t want separation, it was the very last resort to achieve their liberty and freedom. They didn’t want war or separation, yet when they were not being heard or listened to, they had no choice.
It's actually really startling when you start reading more primary sources of the era how much loyalty and faith was placed in the King personally, even by people who would later become revolutionaries. That seems strange to us today, but at the time the real venom of American anger was targeted towards parliament and the ministers. Many believed that once the King got involved he would redress their grievances. The cult of Monarchy was still strong throughout American society. If George had used the least bit of political tact, he could have easily kept the revolutionaries under control.
The King Betrayed us. We asked but to simply be represented in parliament so that taxation may be argued from our position as well. So that we may have a voice and be given the rights due to us as citizens under his kingship. His Majesty's Response? A spit in our face and an increase in violence. The Crown Betrayed Americans and made us so.
@@Sphere723 George never wanted power. To him it was an annoyance. He simply wanted a peaceful life with his family.
@@tsipher They already had it. Maintaining slavery was the desire.
"John Adams" is one of the best miniseries ever.
Only one I can think of that’s definitely better is band of brothers. The Spy with Sacha Cohen is right up there too.
Horatio Hornblower and Band of Brothers is up there as well
@@BalrogUdun hornblower is cool and I enjoyed it, but unfortunately not really believeable
@@mitchellyoung5564 I'll have to look that up
The Winds Of War is my favorite. Robert Mitchum was magnificent as Victor "Pug" Henry.
I love Dickenson's face the first time "traitors" is read from the King's proclamation. He really believed in the King being merciful up until that moment. That really rocked his world. Amazing acting from all the cast in this segment, loved it.
He totally stole this scene, Ivanek nailed the wave of emotions of horror as he realized the mother country was not what he thought.
@Kyle Alexander Wilson No. He told them to cease treasonous activities tha directly threaten the British Empire as a whole. The King made it clear that if they were to stop then they would be handled with "tenderness and mercy". They did not stop and instead took the approach of insurrection and treason, so the British Government responded to the threat. The American Government did similar to the Southern states.
@Kyle Alexander Wilson Bearing arms was not the treasonous activity. It was aiming those arms at the King's soldiers. The press were going about their usual thing. The writing's of Paine is a fine example of that. The assembled plenty. They only had to disperse from their assembly when they were causing serious issues to safety or property; like in the modern U.S. Or in the cass of tragic accidents like The Boston Massacre. John Adams defended those soldiers in court. They also assembled in the Continental Congress with representatives from all 13 colonies own governing bodies. Elections where anyone can vote is rather modern though. You can't judge the British Government on that and not the American. Yes the soldiers living in peoples home isn't great. In fact I hate it. I also hate the fact that the American government can justify taking my land through eminent domain. I don't understand how this makes me a traitor. I love my home, being the United States, and specifically the Keystone State Pennsylvania. I'm just pointing out that King George III was not Emperor Palpatine.
exactly, any in that room still clinging to the crown, got a big dose of reality that day
The King was misled -- by his own "designing men" at court, as well as by his royal narcissism and stern, paternalistic German temperament -- into believing that only a small cadre of the conniving disaffected had initiated and conducted the Revolution to date, against the best interests AND WISHES of the mass of the colonists. He failed to see the thing for what it was -- a popular resistance movement enjoying wide support in most of the colonies, albeit one necessarily LED and REPRESENTED by members of the colonies' intellectual and economic elite. His response to the Olive Branch Petition was thus predictably off-base and harmed Britain's own cause. When war came, Britain's strategy was similarly misguided -- the King's armies kept moving from region to region hoping to unlock the "masses of popular support for the Crown" they had been told to expect; but the local Tories were easily intimidated and their military contribution fairly small.
Imagine modern politicians putting a fraction of that much skin in the game!
Politicians today are more like king george than the Founding Fathers
@@TB-im1ci King George had more guts than the whole of the world's governments combined
Hard times create strong men.
@LegoGuy87 weak men create hard times
@LegoGuy87 Victory is the enemy of constant strength
I've been in that room in Philadelphia and it is very inspiring.
When I was a student in Phila., things were very different and I could sit in Washington's chair. Brought a small plastic hammer with me one day to "ring" the Liberty Bell (it was in the foyer then and the clapper was immobilized). On the second floor there are 2 beautiful portraits of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, gifts to the American people. She wore the diamond ear rings you can now see at the Smithsonian. They were gifts from her husband on the occasion of the birth of one of their children. I got into the attic one day but don't remember any details.
I never watched this show but damn this is powerful. The Man who was so sure of sending a petition of peaceful negotiation to the King received a "Submit to me or die." reply. The sheer horror on his face was unfiltered.
It really shows just how much the British government misread the colonies and underestimated them. At every step, from the proclemation of 1763 to the Coercive acts, to the attacks on Lexington and Concord, to the rejection of the Olive Branch Petition, he missed every opportunity to negotiate. He could have just said he was open to negotiation, even if he would make only symbolic gestures, if only to keep the rebels divided. But he didn't think he had to, because he thought he could destroy the rebels anyway.
I highly, highly recommend watching the series. Its absolutely brilliant. Paul Giamatti does his best work as John Adams. It should be required viewing for every Representative and Senator in Congress today.
@@JohnWilliams-zu8wg They’d be ashamed of how far they’ve fallen from our Founders.
@@JohnWilliams-zu8wg The series has some creative liberties but overall it is a brilliant production, worth watching every single episode.
Something too do with war crimes.
At least surrender was on the table.
Aye war crimes,
U.S. history.
"The army recently took shipment of fifty crates of rifles...all without the flints required to shoot them."
Some things never change.
Eh, it's in the on-ship DLC.
He almost laughed saying that.
been like that since the earliest days of civilization. Money to be made wars to be had Armies to scam.
@@Desmaad Yeah. It's absurd how very short-supplied Washington's army was. He needed supplies very desperately.
We have flint and lots of flint knappers.
One of my two favorite "mini series" John Adams and Band Of Brothers, both just masterpieces from beginning to end. Both make you feel as close to knowing what it must have been like to have lived and died in those times.
Unfortunately, most view those and go quietly back to sleep
@@jeffcooper9363 If you mean they fall into obscurity, I think Band Of Brothers has been recognized for the work it was the the actual soldiers are famous now for their service. John Adams seems to be one of the overlooked founding fathers, and that's crazy cause he loomed large. I hadn't realized he'd defended the British soldiers from the Boston Massacre and won. He was totally against slavery and never had engaged in slave ownership. He also invented the internet and cellphone; just some little known facts. The More You Know! LOL
@@robertkees6048 “be careful what you read on the internet, that’s how ww1 was started” - Abe Lincoln
@@kremesauce Sounds more like Abe Vigoda.
“Got a shipment of 50 crates of rifles without the flints to shoot them”
Good to see congress hasn’t changed a bit
You think our Congress gives our army muskets without flint?
@@umbraemilitos Our congress gave Afghanistan $160 million dollars in aircraft, but not the training to pilot or maintain them. After sitting on the tarmac for a few years, the Afghanistan government scrapped them for junk at pennies on the ton.
@@marktester5799 that's Obama
@@SM-4359 Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist here but it could be that it was some sort of plot to earn money for the weapons manufacturing friends of some politicians with the use of tax dollars, say an appeasement to fund their agendas and future re-elections while minimizing the probable threat that it could pose for the US. I don't know man but US politics is shady as hell sometimes.
@@ttly1384 that's cool but so is the rest of the world, research fast and furious gun sales to Mexican drug cartel
That's why Ben Franklin said, " We must all hang together, or surely we will hang separately."
Cry Havoc - That is a great line, but there’s no indication that Franklin ever actually said it. It was first published decades later and is probably apocryphal...
HailAnts keyes song wasnt published till later on when he wrote it. Not to farfetched to think he said it.
even if he didn't say it he should have and that's good enough for me.
Leave it to Ben Franklin to come up with...Gallows Humor...at a time like this.
I've seen it said "we will either be great men at the end of this or we will all hang together."
Men of strength. Such as we need NOW.
I find a bit of humor in Tom Wilkinson portraying Benjamin Franklin when he also portrayed General Lord Charles Cornwallis in "The Patriot". I do enjoy his performances.
jw870206 I though that was funny as well.
"These rustics are so inept, nearly takes the honour out of victory...nearly"
to bad he could not play them both in the same movie.
jw870206 for God sake, he's a bloody actor, I'm i supposed to be amused he played 2 different parts????
Octavian Caesar Hibernicus Yes. Be amused.
It's moments like this where you gotta admire the 56 men that signed the Declaration of Independence (John and Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Hancock, etc.) because they all knowingly signed what was essentially their own death warrant if America lost the war or if they were somehow captured before the war's end in 1783. John Adams almost got captured on his diplomatic mission to France in crossing the Atlantic and Philadelphia was captured by the British in 1777. I mean hell, in 1776, the Continental Army was not doing all that well and the French had not yet agreed to lend their support, and yet in spite of all that they still signed knowing the risks.
The continental army never did good. Never prevailed. Never winning a unanimous victory. Just an endless string of fighting retreats until they were cornered in New York. Even the victory at Trenton was only so because so sure of victory was cornwallis and the elite that they ordered most of the army back to England expecting full surrender. There were ships which could have possibly caught the armada, but finding them would have been difficult. It would have then taken months on end to turn south to catch the Westerlies and ride them back to the Caribbean and then back up the coast to Boston and New York. Had they only waited a few weeks more, the end of hostilities would have been markedly different.
I love how people try to downplay the military achievements of the continental forces. You're saying that the only reason that the British lost was their hubris? If that is the case, Britain may have been run by the most incompetent group of men in quite some time. You fail to realize that the British Empire had no stomach for a drawn out war in which began because the empire raised taxes to pay for another recent costly war. The empire had nothing to gain, really. If they lost, it only hurt their pride. The revolutionary war to the citizens of England was more akin to the Vietnam War to Americans during the 1960's-70's.
Ummm, Saratoga??
maxdecphoenix: um what about Saratoga?
The British Army wasn't sent back. It wintered in New York, among other places around the colonies.
This series never gets old.
Adams, April Morning, The Madness of King George III and the Patriot with Mel Gibson
What’s the name of this movie or show?
@@ilovemusic6794en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams_(miniseries)
@@ilovemusic6794 John Adams (2008). 7 episode miniseries. There is nothing else quite like it.
John Adams - a 7 part series based on the book of the same name by David McCullough. It is very well done, but some reviewers didn’t get it, thinking that the casting for Adams wasn’t “heroic” enough - utterly laughable. This wasn’t Washington or Hamilton. Adams was a man of little physical prowess, but a giant of a brain and an ego to match (the later got him in trouble as a president as he couldn’t work with his own party). His best strength was his wife Abigail who had a brain to match his own and the strength to run a farm (without slaves - she hired free black) and raise and educated their children (one another future president) while he met destiny in the founding of our nation. Some don’t find it “lush” enough compared with British period dramas, but this was colonial America…a backwater of the world at this time, and the sets and locations reflect that.
Love Franklin's nod at the end of the proclamation. Like he's saying, "Ok, it's on!"
The nod is "yeah, that's about what i expected"
I guess "it's on!" would have meant the start of the war, Perhaps?
@@DavBlc7 The war had already been going on for a year. Franklin wanted to use George's proclamation to promote the colonies declaring independence from Britain, not to start an already ongoing war.
Franklin had tried hard to keep the peace between the colonies and England. They publicly humiliated him while in England and that was it. He instantly became a revolutionary. He knew there was no turning back.
He was saying: It’s about to get real in the colonies, yo!”
The King just threatened to unfriend the Colonies....
+Roger inKC (Roger In Kansas City) LOL!
The 18th Century version of unfriending on Facebook
And the 13 Colonies poke the King in response.
More like he threatened to release their nude pix.
This was waaaay before ALL CAPS FLAME WARS began. We're talking distant past unfriending.
When you examine the courage, valor, and humility of our founding fathers it only shames those we call "Members of Congress" today.
You don’t like our members of Congress? Look who elected them. The Americans of today are nothing like the Americans of 1775. They turn out in droves to elect loudmouth perverts like Matt Gaetz and whacked out conspiracy mongers like Marjorie Taylor-Greene. Don’t pretend like none of that isn’t our fault.
@@zatchbell622 they also turn out in droves to elect pathetic idiots like Biden, incompetent snots like Harris, anti-semitic garbage like Omar, vile little tyrants like Pelosi, scheming hypocrites like Schumer, avowed anti-American marxists like Warnock, AOC, Sanders ... shall I go on? With few exceptions, all of these reprehensible Democrat insects do the bidding of their corporate, media and New World Order masters to turn America into a one-party totalitarian state and destroy the republic that these founding patriots risked their lives to create... and that the Greatest Generation fought so valiantly to preserve.
The best thing to do is keep tract of those you elect in you own community, they you can keep honest and an eye on, those in DC are there for themselves only and no one else save one or two exceptions.
Yup, both parties are pieces of s***. Gotta love our two party system.
All of that is true, yet without the intervention of God Almighty in that war, they would have been a footnote amongst history's great losers. No way they should have won that war but for circumstance after circumstance of the hand of Providence seeing them through.
Love their faces as it dawns on all of them there's no turning back from this, they have to do this or they're screwed either way.
that is right and guess what they did it. Would we do it today if put in their shoes. I am not so sure.
No, considering how the general populous reacted towards brexit.
@John Isaac Felipe I think there's a pretty big difference between continuing to be ruled by a monarch thousands of miles away without any representation and staying within the EU which is made up of the member nations themselves. Not even close to comparable.
M Weyer Franklin said we must all hang together or we'll all hang separately.
@James Gray It was. And if those loyalists had been willing to fight with the same passion and perseverance as the Continentals, the War of Independence could have turned out very differently. They mostly chose to stay home and hide indoors.
"Treason doth never prosper, what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it Treason." - John Harington
It's only Treason if you Lose....
Reminds me of something I heard in a podcast. “There has never been a successful treason attempt, it’s simply a just revolution when it succeeds”
@@josephmariani9945 I can think of some "successful" attempts at treason, wherein the committing party was purely out for themselves/profit, not for an overthrow of the government. They may not overthrow the government they ostensibly serve, but they do betray it. You are right though, that the failures are often much more loudly pronounced "TREASON!!!" than the successes.
Yeah that’s right the southern states were fighting for the same principles this nation was founded on and it’s only called treason or being a rebel if you lose!!!!!!
Reminds me of a line from 1776. "A rebellion is always legal in the 1st person, such as 'our rebellion'. It's the 3rd person, 'their rebellion' that's illegal "
I had a stroke trying to read that. Had to go over it like 5 times to get it 🤣🤣
This is the point where we see these men as more than "just men"
These are people putting not just themselves at risk, but thousands of their own people in peril for a cause. A cause that they in their hearts believed to be just and righteous.
God bless America
"If a man is good at lying at one thing, he is seldom good at anything else." ~Patrick Henry.
Lying is far too powerful a tool for those with ambition to ignore.
"We will now all hang together. Or must assuredly we will all hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin
Gangsta line. One of the two great lines he drops in this series. So gangsta.
Water town treaty.
Asked Mi,kma,ki for support, some of the first ally of the Americans was the Mi,kma.
Hello from Mi,kma,ki
The thing that makes that line especially "Gangsta" is that history shows he really said it.
Franklin really said that, just in a general meeting of congress, rather than a private conversation.
They kinda miss the obvious third option, stop being a traitor.
@@miyelir aka.... be a grade A Puss-AAA
"All thirteen clocks must strike at the same second." The actual quote to to Benjamin Kent, June 22, 1776, in a letter was, " But remember you can't make thirteen Clocks, Strike precisely alike, at the Same Second." It is beginning to sink in with me how much we owe to these insurrectionists....literally EVERYTHING.
They were not insurrectionists they were rebels. Nice try to make Jan 6th people look good though
@@falconeshield I had no intention to try and make Jan 6th people look good.
re·bel·lion: noun an act of violent or open resistance to an established government or ruler.
"the authorities put down a rebellion by landless colonials"
Similar: uprising revolt insurrection mutiny revolution insurgence
@@falconeshield they are the exact same thing.
Yep - and we're just pissing it away. So very sad, but inevitable I reckon.
@@falconeshieldSame thing
I imagine it was a very heady moment for all concerned. There was no going back at that point, sink or swim.
+Daniel Ryan And we are reaching that point AGAIN!!! with this lawless oppressive regime in D.C.
I'm sure some of them saw no choice, either live free, or die a subject of a ruler an ocean away.
thank you captain obvious
@Big Bill O'Reilly God DAMN! Trump
I'm surprised Benjamin Franklin handled the news so well. Out of the founding fathers he was arguably the most loyal one. So much so that he installed that loyalty to the crown so strongly in his son that the two never reconciled after the rebellion. Franklin's son thought
this betrayed everything he was ever taught to believe.
Franklin's opinion of the British Government had soured years prior to the Declaration, after he was ridiculed on the floor of Parliament for injudiciously exposing the contents of certain confidential letters while acting as Postmaster General for the Colonies and as PA's agent in Britain. He lost his posts, was nearly arrested, and brooded over the matter for the several weeks it took him to return to PA by ship. When he stepped off that boat he was a changed man, unalterably opposed to the Crown and its Government and determined that America should be done with both of them. Franklin was not only incredibly intelligent, but articulate, fairly wealthy, well-connected, self-disciplined, and stubborn about achieving any goal he set for himself. He had a talent for discourse, and for putting complex facts in simple terms that helped others -- even if they were of a different background than his own -- to readily see the plain truth and desirability of any proposition he favored. Arguably he became, with Washington, the most dangerous American the Brits had to face.
@@roberthaworth8991 That's fascinating. I wasn't aware of this background event.
For an overly intelligent threat to the crown, he was nonetheless undermined by one of the most successful spies in British history while in France.
@@roberthaworth8991 I was just about to mention how he was ridiculed on the floor of Parliament. He was English when he went into Parliament, and American when he came out.
Maybe it's just a legend, but as he left Parliament that day, he's supposed to have said "I shall make your King a little man!".
@@roberthaworth8991 Is there any truth to old Benny being a total ladies man and constantly fooling around with any girl that has two legs?
It just amazes me the amount of guts, intelligence and fortitude these men had.
They realized (quite wisely) that in order for the revolution to succeed, it had to happen all over the colonies at the same time to keep the British stretched thin. Had simply one state declared independence on its own it would have been utterly crushed by the sheer concentrated might of the British military machine, but altogether, it vastly weakened its ability to concentrate forces in any particular area. That was what wound up being our redeeming strategy.
If they had failed and lost the war, they all would have been tried for treason, likely found guilty and executed.
Agreed, it takes something incredible to go against the most powerful person in the world with your lives on the line.
The founding fathers embodied the proverb - "A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit"
Those statesmen who were on the fence before, now had no other choice but to pick a side. We are lucky that the majority of them chose to persist.
@@jebbroham1776 Also outlasting public support from the UK for them to fight the war, and it had lasted for like 8 years and actually worked. The south in the Civil War tried the same thing but failed, including their attempt for foreign assistance
Cornwallis thinks hes slick dressing up as Ben Franklin like that
Lmao
He's playing both sides so he can always come out on top
Howe do you figure?
@@murphyandotherstuff6884 The joke is that the actor for Benjamin Franklin in this mini-series also played as the actor for General Cornwallis in the movie The Patriot.
Which has the hilarious implication of Ben Franklin/Cornwallis rapidly jumping back and forth in different outfits and living the ultimate double-life to play both sides against each other like some sort of one-man Illuminati.
Tom Wilkinson must have studied the evolution of the American dialect for hours and hours to achieve this. He does a fantastic job!
Tom Wilkinson was born and spent his early years in Yorkshire, and his normal speaking voice has traces of that accent. But apparently his family then moved to Canada for a few years and finally came back to the UK and settled in Cornwall. The accent that he uses in this rôle is largely a Westcountry accent, and more authentic to my ears (I am a Devonian, from the next county to Cornwall) than the usual 'Mummerset' accent affected by actors when required to do a Westcountry accent. Since many of the sailors who manned ships sailing to the New World were likely to have been from the West Country, and perhaps many settlers too, their accent would have contributed strongly to the American accent. However, I don't think that Franklin's forebears had any connection with South West England.
This is from the HBO miniseries "John Adams" in case anyone was wondering.
"We will now all hang together, or most assuredly we will all hang separately."
Franklin, as usual. hit the nail on the head. This was the moment when the impetus for independence happened.
“We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”― Benjamin Franklin
Love that he keeps a positive mood even in the face of an impending deadly threat
I finally got around to watching the whole John Adams show this past summer over the course of a few days.
Absolutely one of the most powerful shows I have ever watched.
I appreciate shows that try hard to bring the moment to moment of life into history. All to often it is easy to read a few paragraphs from a book in school and walk away with knowledge of events but with no understanding of their impact. Stuff like this helps to show you those events, and bring humanity to the black and white text from the pages.
Thank you, John Adams. You had guts.
Continental Congress: You gonna fight a war?
Continental Army: You gonna pay us?
Continental Congress: ......
Continental Congress: ✔ Seen at 11:55 PM
Still have the same problems today.
@Chandler Burse This was BEFORE any of that.
Have some 🍞
@@jbloun911 The only bread they're looking for is: 💲💲💲💲💲💲
What an absolutely EPIC show. Laura Linney was marvelous as Abigail Adams. Everything she touches turns to gold.
This was read on October 26, 1775 (nearly 245 years ago to the very day) during the first session of the Second Continental Congress. John Adams would continue to persist in trying to get unanimity among the colonies for another 8 months before the Declaration of Independence was ratified and signed by the 56 members present.
Was read about two months later - thats how long transatlantic travel took back then. October 26th was the King's date on the proclamation.
What a fascinating time period to have been alive, amazing.
Justin Theroux’s reading of the King’s proclamation was quite emotional. Like he’s wondering how his own country could accuse him of treason.
"King George presents himself as this harmless old codger, but inside..."
When he read the "tenderness and mercy" line, you can just HEAR his internal screaming
I had no clue that was him. Very well done.
I remember arriving to this amazing country as a kid and learning about the founding fathers, their courage, their sacrifice, their achievements, I've had no other heroes to admire. w
U must be an immigrant
@@ShivamSharma-or6lz No shit
Last bit of freedom left for the common man on earth... and they're trying to destroy that
That's awesome. A lot of people who were born into this country takes the Founding Fathers for granted.
@@souperstar7050A lot of American liberals hate the founders simply due to slavery which was a common practice around the world in those days and most of the founders did think that slavery was incompaitable with the ideals of the American Revolution and should end but couldn’t end it in their lifetime. Liberals like to act morally superior and think that if they lived back then they would have been the good guy when most would not have been.
A great collective acting performance. From Justin Theroux to Paul Giamatti to Tom Wilkinson, and everyone in between, it really showed the collective weight on their shoulders, and that a peaceful resolution was no longer on the table. Most importantly, it showed that this was an all or nothing proposition, cause if they lost, they were dead. At least that is my take on it.
That's exactly how it was. The U.S. is in DESPERATE NEED of teaching U.S. History once again to its youth.
Your take is correct.
@tommyl3207 I would dispute the death part. Some probably would be sentenced as such but I doubt they would be executed.
@@johnnotrealname8168 what about treason would mean the signers of the Declaration of Independence would not have been executed? It’s a thing that used to happen all the time. If any signer had been captured he would have been executed for treason 100% likelihood.
can I say, as a British person, the Americans were right.. they were given no choice.. after this, they had to fight
I can say as an American, England was right in imposing alot of the taxes…. They had just spent an enormous amount of money protecting the colonies.
Dont get me wrong i am a true Patriot but they had every right to tax us lol.
Ahh well were all pals now lol
We need men like this now....
you need lol then do something be the man lol step up if you think have balls
Already did. Half my life. I tried to make a difference. I really did. Spent last several years at the funny shaped building in DC. Hardly made a few scratches for good. I tried. I wasn't a yes man. Spent 24 years in the Army. Retired 90 percent disability. Thought about politics. Doubt I would do any better. Do I need to say more?
modernknightone joining the redcoats to try to make a difference, doesn't work. Gotta face the redcoats head on, like the founders did.
The redcoats run the system. To be an outlaw risks exposure
Rand Paul. Thomas Massie. Austin Petersen.
Great production. Remember seeing this years ago. Truly outstanding. Dialogue was exceptional and stellar in ever regard.
I never realized how impressive the cast was
Ain't no sun going to shine on me and say fucke me
I’ve seen a few clips; I’m English and this does look like a good movie to watch.
2:30-even Dickenson is like-well hell, we got no choice now, thats for sure.
He looks misty-eyed as if he's thinking, "Dear God, what have we done?"
@@DarthKieduss Or he's thinking: "we're fucked"....
@@antonbruce1241 in the wise words of bender from Futurama: "Well we're boned!"
He knew what a war with England would bring, death and destruction to his people. We needed people like Dickinson to explore all peaceful options before war was on. Now though there's no choice, and his hopes of a kind response from the King are dashed. As much as Dickinson detested war, when war came, he put on a uniform and fought in it.
Imagine how much pressure they went through receiving that letter, being threatened by the most powerful empire on earth. AND STILL they fought on!! 💙🙏🙏💙🙏💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Britain was not the most powerful empire "on earth" at the time, or even in Western Europe. That title went to the French, the ones who actually won the American Revolution.
Benjamin Franklin was one of the last of the Founding Fathers to consent to American independence. He was one of the two postmasters of the colonies. He was a member of the Royal Society. His son was Governor of New Jersey. He had achieved more distinction than any American ever had, and a good part of that was by royal acclaim. During the troubles with the Mother Country, Benjamin Franklin had been one of the chief conciliatory voices, seeking accord between loyalty to the Crown and defense of colonial liberty. For his trouble, he was berated by the King's solicitor, Alexander Wedderburn, before a full Privy Council. Upon the signing of a treaty with the French, recognizing his new country America, Benjamin Franklin wore the same suit he had worn when he was made to be humiliated by the King's agent.
I viewed this series about a year ago. The film helped me anchor my belief that we have a great country despite our current difficulties. The film also illustrated to me that many current leaders have actively shunned their sacred oath to defend our constitutiion. I really ought to view it again soon.
That is hat happens when civics is no longer taught in public schools
@@nunyabiznez6381 What is "that" which you refer to? By the way, the social studies curriculum is under, and has been under great pressure to cover just about everything. If the social studies staffs followed every request, the kids would be in social studies class all day.
@@daveenyart When I attended school 44-58 years ago, high schools, jr. high schools and middle schools taught civics, history and geography and were only just introducing general courses in "social studies." The that which I am referring to is what you lamented, the shunning of their oath. This is due to their not grasping the meaning of their oath. They get away with it because the electorate, at least the younger members of the electorate, are ignorant of history of and the workings of our governmental system and what was intended by the founding fathers, my ancestors among them. Here is one difference. In middle school I did a report on a founding father who also happened to be my great, great, great, great, great grandfather and if you are educated you would recognize his name. The only hint I will give you is he signed something important in 1776 on behalf of his state. I got an A for my report. I chose him not simply as a way to brag about a historic connection but because I had been taught from early childhood about our family's participation in the formation of this country so I didn't need to so much research on him. At 12 I wrote a 2000 word essay about him off the top of my head then handed it to my Dad to edit and he could find no errors. Hence my A. More recently, my brother's grandson did the same. Except it was for a "social studies" class. We educate our children in my family, in our country's history filling in gaps the school leaves empty. As the family historian I was asked to edit my grand nephew's paper. He did well. This was not a research paper so he was not expected to cite sources but he did mention a few just the same. I only found one trivial error of dates and handed it back to him expecting he would get an A. He did not. He got an F and the teacher handed the paper back with multiple notes and red highlights indicating errors. At the bottom of the page one note says: "ALL FOUNDING FATHERS OWNED SLAVES AND THEREFORE WERE EVIL MONSTERS! 50% OFF FOR FAILING TO MENTION HIS SLAVE OWNERSHIP!" This particular ancestor/founding father never owned slaves and in fact made a concerted attempt at convincing his fellow founding fathers to free their slaves. He spoke out against slavery many times and wrote against the concept. I checked again and there were NO errors in my nephews paper. The teacher, however was mistaken in every thing she put on his paper especially the last part. I wrote a letter to the principal about this unfair grading and I then cited 47 established and irrefutably proven sources to prove my nephew's paper was 100% accurate. I demanded they change his grade to an A for being correct and apologize to him. The principal wrote back informing me that every source I cited was incorrect because they all contradicted their text book. I read the text book. I won't dignify it by naming it. In a nut shell it was nothing but wholly invented bunk claiming that the entire "white race is evil" and goes on rambling on and on about how we are collectively guilty of the sins of our distant ancestors and about a grand conspiracy to suppress all manner of "truth." In that textbook it even claims that the first president of the United States was actually African. I looked the guy up and he was born after our constitution was written. He was also not involved in national government in any way. THIS is what is being taught in our schools to indoctrinate children in the extreme left fringe of lunacy. I'm a centrist. And in fact, I actually blame the Republicans for this since they were the ones who cut school funding in the first place which left no room in school budgets for courses, real courses in civics. when I was in high school we were required to pass four years of civics, four years of history (two US and two world) and one year of geography. Social Studies was an elective take it or leave it. I took it and it included sections on anthropology, psychology, sociology and some other related topics and was interesting. What passes for social studies today is nothing but politically correct paranoid propaganda and enforced guilt trips.
The best mini series ever. Should be played in every school every year
>powers that be try to dismiss the concerns of their people as conspiracy theories.
some things never change.
"A Proclamation by the King: You say the price of my love is not a price you’re willing to pay. You cry in your tea which you hurl in the sea when you see me go by..."
Can you tell me where from this scene is?
@@shahrukhanwar9065 Hamilton, "You'll be back."
@@shahrukhanwar9065 th-cam.com/video/hYr_BdXdpaI/w-d-xo.html
But the proclamation sounds a lot like farmer refuted 🤭
Such a good miniseries, I wish they would do another
I love when Hancock reads "For those who persist in their treason..." twice as if to clear his throat after his eyes see the words that followed. Like "Oh sheeeeeeeeit I don't even want to say this next part out loud."
Phenomenal casting, acting directing, etc. Minus some historical inaccuracies (very few), the whole damn series is perfect. I watch it once a year.
2:07 - Franklin's facial expression is perfect. You can clearly tell that he is mentally processing various ways to deal with the situation upon hearing this gut-punching news
Of all the men in that room, he was the one least surprised. He'd known from his experiences in Britain that the Olive Branch Petition would fail and thus had months to steel his resolve for what he knew would be inevitable. What's more, that same experience dealing with Parliament personally and being torn down by them had long embittered him to the motherland and had already molded him into a man perfectly willing to be done with them already. He just bided his time in the Congress until the King's response would force the other men to get on board for what was coming.
2:24: "Let's see your Quaker sensibilities solve this one, Mr. Dickinson", tbf I actually really felt for Dickinson in this scene
0:42 I can't believe Bryce prefers the King's letter to mine.
Such an awesome series
The brilliant portrayal of Franklin by Tom Wilkinson added a new layer to the story for me. Franklin seems somewhat cavalier over the prospect of rebellion, but at his advanced age he had much less to risk than some of the men in their 30's and 40's. An yet his stubborn nature was crucial in moving things forward.
You know, after watching this series the other day (binge watching this is a July 4 ritual for me), the thought occurred to me that maybe this olive branch petition and others that Adams decried as too soft were necessary, so they could at least say "Hey, we tried it your way." This scene should have been the wake-up call that war was the only way out.
That's how I was always taught to be the case
There are a lot of great portrayals in this series, but an underrated one is Sam Adams. Prior to this mini-series, it had never occurred to me that Sam and John Adams were related. The brotherhood they show is fascinating--both of them so stubborn, but John more level-headed and pompous than his rasher brother, who nonetheless backs John up at every juncture. And here, Samuel's very concise reaction to the King's Proclamation, a statement of defiance which everyone else is too shocked to echo but which nonetheless everyone realizes is completely right.
They were second cousins actually, not brothers. Though since they both grew up in Boston and were of a similar age, it's unsurprising that they formed a close bond.
Fun fact: Sam Adams, as were many generations of his ancestors, was an actual maltster and produced the malt necessary for brewing beer. This is part of the origin of the Samuel Adams beer, introduced in 1984.
Right! I love how they captured that. The shot cuts to Jefferson and he's just staring into space like "Sheeeeeeeeit he's right" and then cuts to John and he quick turns to Sam like "Wow... Indeed".
Ben Franklin was just like " ya wtf did you think was gonna happen " lol
None should have ever been frightened by this eventuality. All those young lads who stared death in the face in the field were fighting in their name. It's only fair that these men sit in that same boat.
Fighting for their independence and facing death if they fail.
"God damn the king"! A true patriot talking.
That's Samuel Adams for ya 😁
Piss on the king 👑
Man of a Word.
He said exactly the thing he Should have said.
@@JustinDaniel1234 A fine brewer of beer!
*Samuel Adams: "Correction, Mr Hancock. F**K the King!" LOL*
Benjamin Franklin reaction when he learns he could be hanged: it is what it is
Well if there's anyone who shouldn't be afraid of death, it's an old man.
The king’s proclamation: “you’ll be back soon you’ll see you’ll remember you belong to me”
No one really belonged to the king at that time. The monarchy has become powerless since the Glorious Revolution
I believe the actor who plays Ben Franklin played Lord Cornwallis in The Patriot.
The actor who played John Hancock was phenomenal as he read the proclamation.
I don’t expect to get a reply as it’s been more than year and this video is many years old, but what was going on with his fingers on his right hand? Did he have frost bite or something?
One of the BEST scenes in the movie...not so much the words, but their expressions!!!
0:30 John Adams’s face here made me cry😂
It endures that the most amazing aspect of this history is the number of super egos that accepted compromise among themselves, without losing focus. What the flag should represent.
I love how Cornwallis is Ben Franklin.
Did you know that Gen. Cornwallis disliked and was against the treatment of the colonists and the colonies. While he did his duty to the crown, he did not want the war.
Also, General Gage's wife was a Bostonian, who may or may not have been one of Washington's spies.
2:19 Sam Adams had the appropriate response
John Adams.
If people only knew this story of these men who were ordered to be hung by the king but never gave up in fighting for the love of this country! Everyone needs to see this series.
hanged
Pro Patria! something today's demented youth have yet to learn..😢
God this was a great show
One of my favorite scenes of this mini series is after being one of the main rabble rousers and knowing he was on King George's list of those to be hanged if ever caught, John Adams had to present himself to and bow before the king as the US's first ambassador to England. Talk about uncomfortable. I've read that, being an official proceeding, notes were taken at the time, and the dialogue in that scene is word for word what was actually said.
I love that quote from Adams: “All 13 clocks must strike at the same second.” Historically accurate? No idea. But I love it!
King George!
Dame him, Dame that Man!!!!!
The captions say 'Don't Save the King-' and that is suprisingly fitting
Happened to come across this clip on the 26th day of October in the year two thousand twenty-one.....246 years to the day of KGIII's speech to parliament.
neat
I love Franklin's reaction, "eh, not bad."
"...I will send a fully-armed battalion to remind you of my love! Da da da da daaaaaa..."
Okay, just for perspective: the founders were going up against THE greatest power on the planet at that time. The British were known for conquest and military power. Best Navy, etc. It’s like reading a death note from Darth Vader, you don’t know if you’ll win but there will be a lot of death before and if you do. The fear at this moment in time must have been unimaginable - which makes me appreciate the Founding Fathers including Washington even more for their passion, standing up for what they believe in, and having a pair to say “No, we reject your offer. We’re no longer British but American,” despite almost every element being against them. Mad respect, thank God for this country.
They were british themselves. New england man. New, exactly. Brits were old with them ideas, colonist the New.
Best navy, perhaps, with Spain and France being close contenders.
But certainly not best army. The Prussian and French armies held that distinction. The British army was far smaller than either the Spanish, Prussian, French, Austrian or Russian armies. Redcoats are always portrayed as exceptionally disciplined and professional in movies, but they only seemed that way when compared to the American rebels. Compared to other European soldiers, the British didn't particularly stand out. Like everyone else, they had their elite units (which never set foot on the American continent), and their run-of-the-mill regulars, who were neither better nor worse than their European counterparts.
According to contemporary sources. British soldiers had a reputation of being quarrelsome, insubordinate, and prone to excessive drinking.
The so-called "Hessians", on the other hand, not all of whom were actually from Hessia, usually displayed a higher degree of discipline and professionalism.
Incidentally, the Hessians were not merenaries, even though Americans to this day choose to unfairly denigrate them as such. They were regular soldiers, in the service of their respective princes. It was not the soldiers or even the officers, who sold their service to the British, but rather their own princes, who sold them away.
@@Timrath - There was an old saying in the British Navy:
A messmate before a shipmate,
A shipmate before a stranger,
A stranger before a dog,
and a dog before a soldier.
Things weren't quite so clear at the time. As with all history, particularly when national pride is involved, a lot of conclusions are retrospective, and don't reflect the perceptions at the time. While the British Empire was certainly in ascendency during the American Revolution, its super-power status wasn't realized quite yet. At the time, France, Prussia, and Austria were believed to be the big guys; and Britain was still a pretentious upstart. Britain's supremacy wouldn't be fully recognized until the defeat of Napoleon, which ironically came 32 years after the Revolution. I'd say the founders certainly had a lot on the line, and a lot to fear, but they also held a card that really paid off in the end. They had France in their back pocket, and that proved to be the deciding factor.
"It's like getting a letter from Darth Vader"
Holy Reddit.
The response from the Colonies was, "Bring it!"
"Come at me bro" George Washington probably.
2:14
"Yea we're fucked"
This makes me want to know about the Olive Branch Petition.
Time to watch John Adams again......great series.
That’s been my annual tradition for the past nearly 8 years, to binge the series just before Independence Day
"All 13 clocks must strike at the same second." Back when most communication was sent on paper via ship, horse or on foot. Each town set it's own time, wrist watches didn't exist & pocket watches were for the rich. Amazing they got it done.
It would be almost a century before the first cannonade from units too far separated to hear each other's shots would be synchronized by timepieces, during the American Civil War. Adams is beyond cutting edge here.
It was a figure of speech, obviously.
its
Thank you Tom for all your brilliant performances...may you rest in peace sir.😊😊
omg I had no idea he had passed. Wow. Such a huge loss. He was a brilliant man and even better actor.
Seriously how did they pull this off.
“All 13 clocks must strike at the same second”- John Adams
Good old George! He never ceases to amaze me...
They couldn't have been shocked that the punishment would be hanging.
Kyle899 One thing to know it, another to hear it.
Well, one could always spit into their faces at the Palace and kicked their butts at the Tower...
There’s a big difference between having knowledge of the consequence of a decision and actually having the proverbial axe aimed at your neck.
It was said that up until that point some of them viewed the conflict as "a kind of lawsuit". Now it was apparent that the king was just going to use force to crush them instead of finding a way to work things out.
@@jayteegamble Yes, as it says on the label: This was the response to the much vaunted "Olive Branch Petition". Many shown here honestly believed King George would see that they did not consider themselves traitors, and wanted to remain British subjects.
Here they learn better.
The governor of Virginia must admire King George.
Has he not examined his own state seal? Does he truly believe he is Virtue, and not the Tyrant lying under her foot? I fear, greatly, that in his arrogance, he cares not a moth-eaten patch, not for Virtue, not for King George, and certainly not for the Founders, or for the people of the state he believes BELONGS to him and his kind.
I didn’t know they had video cameras back then, this is mind blowing
"Independence without unanimity means nothing." -Benjamin Franklin
*THIS APPLIES TODAY*
I don't think that statement makes any sense at all in a vacuum. The context is important.
Yeah, "This applies today," tell that to the fucking Trumpers who have chosen Putin's Puppet over their country.
Trump lives in your brain rent free. How cute. 😂
@@johnroscoe2406 Either Putin Trump or Beijing Biden. Both parties compromised. You're just too focused on one to see the other for who he really is as well.