the center colour is fixed already, so the cube is already pre-solved a little bit. Still Mitsubishi delivers a pretty good quality, I'm working with some of their old products and they were ahead of time back then I would say the only limiting factor back then was the electronic and that they tried to solve with FPGAs.
@@ivantrofimenko4562 I thought about it again certainly I'm wrong with my nonsense assumption. I solved those cubes a few times but mostly forgot about them again.
Whoever survives the Ecological Overshoot Unraveling will not believe that so little was done to prevent the climate disaster and resultant global famine but that we had the interest to run this toy puzzle faster; this says a lot about a technical society that that only knows "faster and faster."
We call it the God Number (cause with 43 quintillion of possible scrambles, only God would find the optimal solution each time) and it's 20, not 27 ^^ If you would like to know more about this, the TH-camr Jperm made a video about how we discovered it and how long was the journey until, after twenty-thirty years, we "manually" reduce a maximum the possibilities until Google said "HI ! We can share some of our supercalculators to help you !" And it tooks weeks to have the final result XD
@@ivantheterrible4317 I your question is not relevant (the question, not you ^^) for two reason : - A y rotation is two moves : u D' (sorry if you're not familiar with the cube notation, on this point you have to trust me :/), same with x (r L') and z (f B') - And even with that, no one of the optimal solution need a rotation to be solved above 20 moves. If so, it's not optimal. Because God Number, plage /o/ (Me ? A nerd ? Yes :) )
@@ivantheterrible4317 Around 25 but let's continue the visit of the rabbit hole ! Fastest solves don't use the optimal solution to be fast, because of the weird layer you have to turn. The main speeldsolve method has a move count around 60 for a normal solve, 30-35 with a lot of luck, cause we solve it using steps (white cross, two layer in a row, last layer yellow, finish it) and with a good turn per second (TPS) you can solve it with indecent time. I know that it exists methods for machines, I don't know how it works but maybe there is the same problem about "fewest move is not fastest solve"
@@psychiatry-is-eugenics Japanese is a highly context-dependent language, in which sentence content that can be inferred is often omitted. They are congratulating Mitsubishi on their new Guinness record.
Scramble is: U' F2 R L F2 D R2 U2 R' F2 U' D' B2 R' D2 R2 with yellow on U and blue on F face. It's very obviously a very symmetric and not at all random scramble .. but they are not even applying the optimal solution which would only be 16 moves and half of those can be done in parallel by the robot (left and right, up and down or front and back at the same time), which they only do 2 or 3 times in their unoptimal solution.
@@TonyFisherPuzzles Because the chance for ANY scramble is 1 in 43 QUINTILLION. But out of those, the VAST majority are asymmetrical. Think of scrambling half the cube and then arranging the other half to be symmetrical. There is only ONE solution for every half scramble, where as for every other solution, there is almost endless ways. So for them to luckily stumble upon a perfectly symmetrical scramble like that seems to be too much of a coincidence for a situation like that.
@@valentinfriedrich8375 it also isn't an indent that can be gripped like this robot does. therefore as a speed record for a Rubik's cube, you can understand if someone considers it to not count right? else if you're going to allow modifications why not give it more rounded edges and super precise ball bearings? it's either the unmodified cube or it's not. this is not the unmodified cube.
@@daarkdocumenteryou have no idea what ur talking about. The center pieces do not rotate. Along with that, ever world record set for cubing is done using a cube that is not from Rubiks. They have magnets, ball bearings, core magnets and center magnets. You don’t know anything lmao
Since unequal scrambles were used, the only reasonable way to measure such a record is the number of turns per second. The old record would then be faster, even if possible rounding errors are taken into account. Against this background, a highly questionable record. The people at Guinness WR are probably not that stupid. I suspect there is not enough information available on how the record was actually judged. Perhaps there were actually 100 attempts, which were averaged, and we only see the fastest one. (?)
is it a real rubix cube? some of the squares have rounded edges...or is that rounding from abrasion? The timing has to be perfect for them not to rub, or get jammed.
It's called a speed cube... the same thing just with more optimised components.... such as rounded edges to let us corner cut easier(which means we don't have to be as accurate with our turns, and doesn't lock up like with the original cube.
@@Blake-o7 cool, I had no idea there were competition cubes...generally speaking how much faster is it to solve a speed cube compared to a standard rubik's?
Bence mantıklı değil sebebi şu siz bu işlemi geri alıp karıştırdıgınızda küp otamatik olarak dagılacaktır bunu çözmüş gibi göstermek için ileri tuşuna basmanız yeterli ben isterdimki o küpü bir insan karıştırsın sonra makineye koysun 😂😂😂😂😂
Just a few moves and it's solved. Seems like the cube was set to a position just a few moves short of solving. Like that, I did it in 0.5 seconds. One move to the right.
@@codetech5598может подскажешь друг, на что, на какие части куба надо ориентироваться, для того чтобы ходы были оптимальны? Может контрольные сектора нужно как-то выставить, или углы, или ряды
Check out Wikipedia for source on this. The maximal number of face turns needed to solve any instance of the Rubik's Cube is 20,[2] and the maximal number of quarter turns is 26.
@@TheRoadstr See, the joke is: In the past, we thought we'd live in a future with flying cars, where everyone had a personal jet pack to fly around with. We didn't get that world. Instead, we got a future where a machine can solve a Rubik's cube in .305 seconds.
That robot is cheater: 1) it has 6 hands instead of 2. 2) the team change construction of cube (each manipulator has four claws integrated into slots between little squares, human can not, and they change some original squares to robot-compatible). This record should be registered as a record among technical devices.
what variant/brand/model of cube as been used here? There are so many models that I honestly have never understood shit which one has the best quality/price ratio.
I guess the biggest challenge is rotating the layers at this speed without the cube shattering.
the center colour is fixed already, so the cube is already pre-solved a little bit. Still Mitsubishi delivers a pretty good quality, I'm working with some of their old products and they were ahead of time back then I would say the only limiting factor back then was the electronic and that they tried to solve with FPGAs.
@@mrechbreger, central cubes are always "fixed". They never change position
@@ivantrofimenko4562 I thought about it again certainly I'm wrong with my nonsense assumption. I solved those cubes a few times but mostly forgot about them again.
oh good look.. all center cross it's already completed... Mitsubishi cheating mf... lol
@@annamariavivaldiread above, center cubes are always fixed.
When aliens invade earth, show them this, this will save mankind.
Nope. They will dispatch sophont to disrupt servos preventing future record breaking and we're screwed.
Whoever survives the Ecological Overshoot Unraveling will not believe that so little was done to prevent the climate disaster and resultant global famine but that we had the interest to run this toy puzzle faster; this says a lot about a technical society that that only knows "faster and faster."
I'm more impressed the cube is able to withstand this.
Fr
I heard that the computer solves the Rubik's cube in 27 moves in every case. But the solution speed has increased a lot.
We call it the God Number (cause with 43 quintillion of possible scrambles, only God would find the optimal solution each time) and it's 20, not 27 ^^
If you would like to know more about this, the TH-camr Jperm made a video about how we discovered it and how long was the journey until, after twenty-thirty years, we "manually" reduce a maximum the possibilities until Google said "HI ! We can share some of our supercalculators to help you !"
And it tooks weeks to have the final result XD
@@EltristeDJ If the 1/4 of full rotation is one move, how many moves did it make? 24? I don't see someone saying it. Do you know?
@@ivantheterrible4317 I your question is not relevant (the question, not you ^^) for two reason :
- A y rotation is two moves : u D' (sorry if you're not familiar with the cube notation, on this point you have to trust me :/), same with x (r L') and z (f B')
- And even with that, no one of the optimal solution need a rotation to be solved above 20 moves. If so, it's not optimal. Because God Number, plage /o/
(Me ? A nerd ? Yes :) )
@@EltristeDJ ok. How many are the moves of this specific solution?
@@ivantheterrible4317 Around 25 but let's continue the visit of the rabbit hole !
Fastest solves don't use the optimal solution to be fast, because of the weird layer you have to turn.
The main speeldsolve method has a move count around 60 for a normal solve, 30-35 with a lot of luck, cause we solve it using steps (white cross, two layer in a row, last layer yellow, finish it) and with a good turn per second (TPS) you can solve it with indecent time.
I know that it exists methods for machines, I don't know how it works but maybe there is the same problem about "fewest move is not fastest solve"
That thing solved the cube faster than my squeezing out a little fart.
The timer shows 0.204 seconds so i am confused.
Leaving room for you to beat it😂
Read the text at the bottom of the video.
今日テレビで観ました、凄いです！ギネスおめでとうございます㊗
Why congratulate Guinness ?
Guinness did not have anything to do with it
@@psychiatry-is-eugenics Japanese is a highly context-dependent language, in which sentence content that can be inferred is often omitted. They are congratulating Mitsubishi on their new Guinness record.
How long it takes to setup scrambled cube?
27 moves in reverse
Now that's impressive !
I blinked and it was over.
honestly, this makes it even more impressive that 3 young students in my local area made one that can do it in 0.385s
想像以上に「一瞬」だった。
キューブって、こんなスピードでもちゃんと回るんだなぁ
it s not a normal cube. i tested many ones before finding a good one for my project.
Inacreditável um Robô 🤖 bater Recorde Mundial é pra Poucos. !!! 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
how many cubes did they explode attempting this?
All but one.
Scramble is: U' F2 R L F2 D R2 U2 R' F2 U' D' B2 R' D2 R2 with yellow on U and blue on F face.
It's very obviously a very symmetric and not at all random scramble .. but they are not even applying the optimal solution which would only be 16 moves and half of those can be done in parallel by the robot (left and right, up and down or front and back at the same time), which they only do 2 or 3 times in their unoptimal solution.
How can you state it's not a random scramble when the probability of any set of moves is identical?
@@TonyFisherPuzzles Because the chance for ANY scramble is 1 in 43 QUINTILLION. But out of those, the VAST majority are asymmetrical. Think of scrambling half the cube and then arranging the other half to be symmetrical. There is only ONE solution for every half scramble, where as for every other solution, there is almost endless ways. So for them to luckily stumble upon a perfectly symmetrical scramble like that seems to be too much of a coincidence for a situation like that.
I, for one, welcome our new cube manipulating overlords
Yes but can the machine remove the stickers and replace them to loom like the cube was solved just as fast
Why does the timer say 0:00'00"204 if the record is 0:00'00'305?
They added .101" for a tip.
世界最高の技術をおバカなテーマで無駄遣いするのは大好き❤
All center cubes are not a color. How did nobody notice lol
We noticed that it bothers you, why is that?
Yeah I don't think this counts as a record because the cube is altered.
The center cube is not relevant to solve the cube. It doesn't move.
@@valentinfriedrich8375 it also isn't an indent that can be gripped like this robot does. therefore as a speed record for a Rubik's cube, you can understand if someone considers it to not count right? else if you're going to allow modifications why not give it more rounded edges and super precise ball bearings? it's either the unmodified cube or it's not. this is not the unmodified cube.
@@daarkdocumenteryou have no idea what ur talking about. The center pieces do not rotate. Along with that, ever world record set for cubing is done using a cube that is not from Rubiks. They have magnets, ball bearings, core magnets and center magnets. You don’t know anything lmao
Guinness is not a real adjudicator, they're just an advertising firm, but this accomplishment is super awesome regardless
Yes but they make great beer
@@socialtraffichq5067 Not my style, but it's definitely reliably decent, they should do more of that
I am wondering whats that cube and how it didn't pop
見ました 凄いです👏
But it needs a special cube that supports this speed without being broken
This is the correct use of the motor.
Please work on Kumo cloud WiFi interface
This is actually a model of the universe
Is it my impression or maybe the centers are in the wrong place
Speedster 🤩
Mitsubishi must have beefed up the cube, added bearings or something. It should have exploded.
That's the new Mazda rotary engine
すんごい！さすが三菱さん！
Reconstruction and scramble?
What will happen if you modify a cube so that it is unsolvable 😂
Since unequal scrambles were used, the only reasonable way to measure such a record is the number of turns per second.
The old record would then be faster, even if possible rounding errors are taken into account.
Against this background, a highly questionable record.
The people at Guinness WR are probably not that stupid.
I suspect there is not enough information available on how the record was actually judged.
Perhaps there were actually 100 attempts, which were averaged, and we only see the fastest one. (?)
time to go for sub 0.3 seconds
What's a puzzle cube?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubik%27s_Cube
How many moves? I thought 20 was the minimum? 🤔
27
is it a real rubix cube? some of the squares have rounded edges...or is that rounding from abrasion? The timing has to be perfect for them not to rub, or get jammed.
It's called a speed cube... the same thing just with more optimised components.... such as rounded edges to let us corner cut easier(which means we don't have to be as accurate with our turns, and doesn't lock up like with the original cube.
Also it's Rubik's not rubix
@@Blake-o7 cool, I had no idea there were competition cubes...generally speaking how much faster is it to solve a speed cube compared to a standard rubik's?
How many were the moves?
27
Chuck Norris built this robot during his lunch break!
And he told the robot which motor to start and stop at the right time.
Chuck Norris eats lunch while the robot solves the puzzle.
Including desert.
Chuck Norris, with just kicks, shuffled a rubik cube in an unsolvable way
Chuck Norris placed his hand on the table, and a robot was born.
Chuck Norris built the Robot faster than the Robot solved the Puzzle
速い速度に対応できる、凄いルービックキューブだ🤣
時代はここまでになっていたのか！！昔何時間もかけて、説明書を見ながらやったのに、あの苦労は0.35秒以下なのか…
Good promo for Mitsubishi cars as well
Why is that? Mitsubishi automobile division is only a small part of what it produces.
今年のJIMTOFで展示されそう・・・
It's not "a puzzle cube" but "Rubics cube" for the name of the inventor.
It's probably one of the many clones, so they can't use Rubik's name.
Разобран и собран по одному алгоритму
Это изобретение спасёт человечество от вымирания 👏 кто ставит инженерам такие задачи… оно большое, оно дорогое, оно моно задачное, оно мусор!🚮
Bence mantıklı değil sebebi şu siz bu işlemi geri alıp karıştırdıgınızda küp otamatik olarak dagılacaktır bunu çözmüş gibi göstermek için ileri tuşuna basmanız yeterli ben isterdimki o küpü bir insan karıştırsın sonra makineye koysun 😂😂😂😂😂
Just a few moves and it's solved. Seems like the cube was set to a position just a few moves short of solving. Like that, I did it in 0.5 seconds. One move to the right.
It always just takes a few moves to solve if you use the optimum moves. There are slower ways to solve using common moves.
@@codetech5598может подскажешь друг, на что, на какие части куба надо ориентироваться, для того чтобы ходы были оптимальны? Может контрольные сектора нужно как-то выставить, или углы, или ряды
@@АндрейАн-в8в There are many videos about this. In English it is called "speedcubing".
Check out Wikipedia for source on this. The maximal number of face turns needed to solve any instance of the Rubik's Cube is 20,[2] and the maximal number of quarter turns is 26.
@@АндрейАн-в8в😮
No jet pack, though. But that's cool. Whatever.
Jet pack? What jet pack?
@@TheRoadstr See, the joke is: In the past, we thought we'd live in a future with flying cars, where everyone had a personal jet pack to fly around with. We didn't get that world. Instead, we got a future where a machine can solve a Rubik's cube in .305 seconds.
Ну и что, это робот,компьютер и он запрограммирован, этих кубиков он может собрать миллион в секунду, вопрос только в технике🤷
That robot is cheater:
1) it has 6 hands instead of 2.
2) the team change construction of cube (each manipulator has four claws integrated into slots between little squares, human can not, and they change some original squares to robot-compatible).
This record should be registered as a record among technical devices.
And that's how it is. The record is "fastest robot to solve a rotating puzzle cube".
It literally says "for robots" in the title. BTW WCA rules do not specify the number of hands you can use.
Восстание машин: начало 😅
パズルキューブ痛そう・・・ 何個壊したんだろうか無茶しないで
Обман! Комбинация была заготовлена и откатана на 12 шагов назад.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
この速度に耐へ得るキューブが有るとしたら普通のプラ製品ではなく金属製品なのではなからふか??
Выглядит зловеще 😬
Чем только люди не занимаются.
i see 0.204s
And all this stuff to move the cube?
No, the robot existed before, normally it produces windings for electric motors. They just adjusted it because why not...
早すぎる(^^;
Damm
Why are Mitsubishi vehicles so unreliable ?
ee
…
Fraud, all center squares are not a color
They can out colors next time just for you.
No no. Is cheats. Custom cube.
Я быстрее могу
what variant/brand/model of cube as been used here? There are so many models that I honestly have never understood shit which one has the best quality/price ratio.
Looks like this one is just a Rubik's brand
Ma basta con queste macchine, avete stancato